minutes of the meeting public health, welfare … · physical therapists believe that the medical...
TRANSCRIPT
MINUTES OF THE MEETING PUBLIC HEALTH, WELFARE & SAFETY COMMITTEE
MONTANA STATE SENATE
January 16, 1987
The meeting of the Senate Public Health, Welfare and Safety Committee was called to order by Chairman Dorothy Eck on January 16, 1987, at 1 P.M. in Room 410 of the State Capitol.
ROLL CALL: All members of the committee were present.
CONSIDERATION OF SENATE BILL NO. 31; SEN. JUDY JACOBSON, sponsor of the bill, District #36, stated that the purpose of the bill is to allow patients to have direct medical access to physical therapists without having to have a medical doctor's referral. Consumers now have direct access to practitioners in other health-related professions, such as occupational therapists, chiropractors, nutritionists, spor"ts trainers, etc. Physical therapists believe that the medical referral system is outdated and that consumers should have direct access to them, as well. Patients would still need a doctor's referral to get Medicare-Medicaid payments. Physical therapists have concur:r"ed in amendments to the bill.
PROPONENTS: MARY MISTAL, physical therapist from Billings, gave a historical perspective on the development of the physical therapy profession. It had its modern beginnings in WW I, when doctors referred \vounded soldiers for rehabilitation through physical therapy. Physical therapists first trained in hospitals, in the 1940's established certificate programs, expanded the care offered during vm II and the Korean War, and then developed degree programs. Technological advances and research have allowed for a tremendous expansio~ of services; and Physical Therapy education has four to six-year programs with degrees to the Ph. D. level, with specific training to meet the needs of various age groups. P.T.'s operate in hospitals, clinics, and nursing homes; eleven states have direct patient access to phys. thera-pists. Exhibit #1.
RICHARD GAJDOSIK, Associate Professor of Physical Therapy at the Univ. of MT, testified on several key aspects of a physical therapy student's education: students are taught procedures to evaluate needs, to recognize signs of normal and abnormal symptoms and to understand the limitations of physical therapy, and to work in cooperation with other members of the health field. The program seeks to have well-qualified students; and they produce conpetent, independent-thinking therapists. Exhibit #2.
CLAY EDI'lARDS, physical therapist, testified that the practice of physical therapy will not change dramatically; 90% will still be seen by a physician. But people in several categories will benefit: handicapped school children who get slowed in the school system through the referral to physician system, people with chronic pain, who must always get a doctor's referral, business
Public Health, Welfare and Safety Committee January 16, 1987 Page 2
people who attend seminars on avoiding injury at work and ask informational questions ( are physical therapists breaking the law now by conducting these seminars), and the public in general. Society is generally trying to become more physically fit. Anyone can open up shop and advise on physical fitness, nutrition, etc., except for P.T.'s, who must have a doctor's referral. The referral system has outlived its usefulness. Exhibit # 3.
GARY LUSIN, President, Montana Chapter of Physical Therapists, emphasized that physical therapists have continued to meet the needs of people through the years. People often don't need to see a physician and treatment is provided by a physical therapist. The public is recognizing the benefits of physical therapy in providing long-term solutions to health problems and learning to manage their problems themselves. Physical therapists offer cost-effective care and will continue to use the team approach. They know the limits of their profession, plus the scope of treatment will not change in Montana. They request direct patient access to their profession. Exhibit #4.
P. SCHLESINGER, M.D., Great Falls, stated that patients need more direct access to physical therapists and that should not hurt the relationship with doctors. They have direct access to other practitioners with less extensive training. Physical therapists are the most qualified to educate the pub- ~ lic on preventive care and direct access would increase their opportunities to educate. Liability costs should not be affect-ed because of the excellent record of care in the past. Exhibit #5.
AIMEE V. HACHIGRAA, M.D., orthopedic surgeon, testified that she has had only two weeks of training in rehabilitation in her formal education and the rest by osmosis while a physical therapist has had over four years of education in that specific field. A person in need of rehabilitation has time with a therapist every day and only one session with a doctor. The initial cost of seeing a doctor could run $150 plus x-rays and paperwork, while the initial cost of seeing a physical therapist would be $40 plus x-rays. Physical therapists can be covered by major medical insurance companies. Montanans often cannot afford to see doctors because of a lack of insurance coverage, while they can more easily afford to see a P.T. This may be a turf question.
W.C. SMITH, Helena podiatrist, stated that he had worked for several years with physical therapists and found that they are competent and correct in their diagnoses.
CHADENE BURKHARTSMEYER, consumer of P.T.'s, has found them to be competent in assessment of her condition and have provided her with an excellent prevention program. Public should have direct access.
DEBBIE OLSON, patient, has had to have a doctor's referral twice when she could have gone directly to the therapist.
Public Health, Welfare and Safety Committee January 16, 1987 Page 3
JERRY LINDORF, physician, stated that he wants to see a qualified monitoring group for physical therapists and would like to see the addition a physician and a member of the public to the licensing board. of A physician would recognize any problems arising between doctors and physical therapists, and any actions that are grounds for discipline or malpractive would be reported to the board.
MABEL GASKILL, patient, would like to have direct access to a P.T.
STANLEY ROSENBERG, President of Rosenberg Assoc. working with Rehabilitation hospitals, has a chronic problem requiring physical therapy. He has found that qualified physical therapists have correctly treated him and he has found a doctor's referral unnecessary and expensive. He feels that the physical therapist would refer him to a doctor, if necessary. Exhibit # 6.
JUDY BIRCH, OPI, stated that sometimes needs to see a therapist while doing extensive auto traveling (she) for work. Her doctor in Great Falls is too far away to have call for referral.
CRIS VALINKETZ, Developmentally Disabled of Montana, stated that she has had to have unnecessary prescriptions from doctors for children needing physical therapy.
MONA JAMISON, LOBBYIST, :'Montana Association of Physical Therapists, stated that: Physical therapists have a strong educational background, including academic and clinical training with emphasis~on diagnostic skills. They are practicing now within the scope of their profession. Benefits: People know quite well which health care practitioner they need. The bill should have no impact on insurance rates. The bill will not change the freedom of choice statutes, which require~ that health coverage go directly to P.T's. The association supports the amendments, which will help E:"'T~_' s :..continue their ties with the medical profession, but feels that the referral process is outdated. Exhibit # 7.
OPPONENTS: LEE HUDSON, Chiropractor, Great Falls, Board of Directors, Montana Chiropractic Association, stated that the Chiroprac-' tic Association does not feel that physical therapists have sufficient education to become portal of entry/primary health care providers, especially when their education is compared with that of chiropractors. See comparisons of training in Exhibit # 8.
GARY BLOM, President, Montana Chiropractic Association, stated that physical therapists are lacking in diagnostic and evaluation skills, particularly the use of X-ray. Many patients might be suffering from fractures or cancer that a p.t. would not detect. Therefore, it would be in the best interests of the public to approve this legislation. Exhibit # 9.
Public Health, Welfare and Safety Committee January 16, 1987 Page 4
BONNIE TIPPY', Montana Chiropractic physical therapists' training will level. She questioned whether the
diagnosis. Exhibit # 10.
Association, stated that the be upgraded to the Master's public should be into self-
KEN HASSLER, MT. Health Underwriters Association, stated that medical care is defined as that prescribed by a physician; if medical care is not prescribed by a doctor, physical therapy claims could be denied. Exhibit #11.
BOB ROBINSON, Workers compensation, stated that this bill does not address the MCA section, 33-22-11, on compensation.
DISCUSSION ON SB 31: Sen. Willia~s: Would passage allow a physical therapist to write a person off? Sen. Jacobson: No.
Sen. Himsl: Testimony has not addressed the amendments, which substantially change the bill. Sen. Jacobson: The amendments do not change the bill, but merely add to it.
Sen. Himsl: This strikes 37 and places it under Section 2. Karen Renne: This puts the new section 2 in front of Section 1, which will become Section 3 if the amendments are added.
Sen. Meyer: What costs are involved? Mona Jamison: The board is already set up under Title 2, and there is sufficient funding to cover the costs of two additional members.
Sen Jacobson: To close, the Montana Medical Association is comfortable with the situation. The bill is fair and reasonable and the public is protected by having direct access. I urge a do pass.
Chairman Dorothy Eck then opened the hearing on Senate Bill #6 by calling on the bill's sponsor, Sen. Lybeck, District # 4. Sen. Lybeck stated that only 19% of Americans have completed organ donor cards, although many more people would probably like to donate organs. This bill would allow survivors to donate a deceased's· 'organs, if the family was confortable with that choice. Hospitals will draw up porper protocol procedures. to deal with these sensitive situations.
The meeting adjourned at 3:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Public Health, Welfare and Safety COMMITTEE
50th LEGISLJ\'rrVE SESSION ._- 1987 Da te /-4(- J'.P - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ABSENT EXCUSED
Dorothy Eck
Bill Norman x Bob Williams 'v ------------------------------------~------~--------+--------------~------------~
Darryl Meyer
Eleanor Vaughn
Tom Rasmussen
Judy Jacobson
Harry H. "Doc" McLane
Matt Himsl -~
Tom Hager
_________________ . ____________ . __ L-______________ ~ ________ . ____ L_ ______ ~
Each day attach to minutes.
v DA'l'E.L~_.~_=-J.4!t .. COMMIT'rEB ON~~ tt/+ ,/~
( ~ VISITORS' R~GISTER ··-·-------------r---· -._ .... _._ .. _-_.---.. -- '---
NAME . HEPRESEN'l'ING BILL # ~--...",..~
;/ 4---_ ... _. -_ .. -+--
_~W~4-<~~~~~~ __ +----L..L¥~LC!.·J z1?Lt'>J~'~~:~'5~2..!....L-!LL-t-_V_----:;-/-+-_
P. \'. _; ___ --+-_-+--V--r--l--
~ il-<Lhnd! /
't} ~~~~,4?-_~--=;.L.J--V--~-'f ( If V
~
. S/)b
)/1 / J
'\-, VISI'l'ORS' HEGISTER --- -------------{---
NAME HEPRESENTING L __ -_ -----------it-------
----------ose BILL #
_~~ PS}:s __________ 5!}3L ,/
~-~IbJL~-~,O~ I U_1~' - -~c;t~cxjJ/X'r,"'5-.-- -/ -+--
._~ ,. , . . liAJ~. tiLl ~_,,----tl( -t-'--'--'-"---'-""-I--I---l-'~-I---J.Jl1/+ - M-AJ.-~----__t_£-=-,,.L...f-_4_--~-~-.
IT, SB 31
!..-------------------+----------
--------------+--~---
--_ .. _-----------
--------------+-
------ --------- ----4-
,------------ --- -----------1-- ---
----------------t------------------ ------t------+--
----------------------+---
------------+----
-------------ir------l-------Jf----
------f-----4---
----------
(Plcclsc leilvP pro[JarC'd slatcmcnt with Sccrctarv)
SENATE HeAL! Ii Ix VV.:.Lrllt(i:. ~
FV.!.l::~lT CO __ -'-1----- I
MONTANA CH)A:PTER-L-(~ .Y/ ~ e~LL. 5i2-J~...,! OF THE
AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION
AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF PHYSICAL THERAPY
Physcial therapy emerged as a medical discipline following World War I. A formal program for physical rehabilitation was needed but none existed. As a result of a study of European programs for physical rehabilitation, the Division of Special Hospitals and Physical Reconstruction was established in August, 1917. Physicians developed Reconstruction Aides from physical educators and nurses to assist in rehabilitating the surviving patients with war-related injuries and disabilities from World War I.
In the early 1920's, the Reconstruction Aides organized to become the American Physiotherapy Association. These early physiotherapists, as they were known, were trained in hospitals for short periods of time to meet the needs of our country.
By the 1930's, the American Medical Association with the American Physiotherapy Association developed educational programs for physiotherapy in medical schools. As the success and reputation of physiotherapy grew, so too did its body of knowledge culminating by 1940 in certificate programs fOD individuals holding bachelor degrees in physical education or nursing.
I I I
During the 1940's and 50's, an Americanized designation to physical therapy from physiotherapy was made. Three significant forces (World War II, the Korean Conflict, and the polio epidemic) during this time spurred the ~ growth of the profession. Many victims of these travesties were kept alive with physical rehabilitation becoming an integral part of their existence.
In the late 50's and early 60's, physical therapy education evolved into baccalaureate degree programs, with an increasing number of states believing it appropriate to license the practitioners of physical therapy.
By the mid-60's, public policy recognized the physical therapy profession through inclusion in the Medicare and Medicaid legislation. The physical problems of the senior citizens increased with the aging of the general population, necessitating an expansion of expertise in physical therapy.
From the mid-60's to the present, the expansion of skill, professionalism and knowledge through specialized research in physical therapy has continued. Greater amounts of work have been produced for physical therapists as the technology in medicine improves and extends lives. This has been evident in the polio epidemic survivors, in military conflict as in Vietnam, and most recently in total joint replacements and other innovative reconstruction",,procedures in the senior population. ~
By 1969, all fifty states licensed physical therapists. One year certificate programs have been phased out and replaced with four and six year degree granting university programs accredited by the American Physical Therapy Association. Advanced degrees at the Master's and Doctoral levels are held by many therapists. Specialization in the areas of orthopedics, pediatrics, cardiopulmonary, sports physical therapy, and clinical electrophysiology is currently taking place with board certifies specialists being named I annually as the strict criteria is met.
Presently, physical therapists in Montana practice in tation centers, schOOl systems, private offices, industry, Our knowledge and expertise includes rehabilitative skills methods promoting health and wellness.
hospi tals, rehabili - ""'/'1 and nursing homes. and preventive
I
Page Two AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF PHYSICAL THERAPY
SEN,Jc iii..I\UH 01 ,,_ ... r .. lt~
EXHIJli i:). _LI---DATE ,1- /C- - J ,7 BILL NO. .$' {3 3 I -
Direct patient access to physical therapy is the logical step in allowing consumer choice in today's health care market. Eleven states and the u.S. Army have recognized this and have made physical therapy services directly accessible to the public.
We look for your support for direct patient access (SB 31) to continue the advancing growth of the physical therapy profession in Montana.
Respectfully submitted
YlKVVj llJt ,jf.J1, >1 Mafy Mistal, P.T. Vice-President of the Montana Chapter of the American Physical Therapy Association
Richard L. Gajdosik, Associate Professor Physical Therapy Program University of Montana
St.i'L.iE HcALfH 61 ~~":"Lr.'J{c
['" :": L
L:, / - /C- - J,'? 5B . .7~ '"
As a representative of the Professional Physical Therapy Program at the University of Montana, I would like to speak in support of Senate Bill 31. I have been on the faculty at the University of Montana for 10 years. I helped plan and implement the Program at the University. The Program was first accredited by the American Physical Therapy Association in 1981, and is currently fully accredited.
Because we seek to prepare physical therapists to deliver services primarily in a rural setting, we select mature, highly qualified students. Their average age is 27 years, their average GPA is 3.5, and they score in the top 10% on the national professional licensing examination.
Our goal is to produce independent thinking, competent practitioners. In order to achieve this goal we prepare students to evaluate neurological, musculoskeletal, and related cardiovascular and respiratory functions of patients, and to determine the appropriate physical therapy procedures to maintain or restore strength, range of motion, and improve functional levels. The students complete coursework in . anatomy, physiology, neuroanatomy, pathology, physical therapy sciences, and medical sciences. They learn the signs and symptoms of both normal and abnormal functions of the body, and they learn to identify and quantify measurable data on patients. We teach the students to perform physical therapy evaluations by first collecting subjective and objective information. After assessing this information they develop a plan of treatment. They are instructed to recognize the limits of our scope of practice, and they learn to consult with other members of the health team when questions arise or when signs and symptoms are not consistent with those of expected movement dysfunctions. Through this education physical therapists are capable of autonomous practice in close cooperation with all members in the medical field.
The increasing number of scientific research publications documented in our professional journals demonstrates that we have accepted responsibility for generating our own body of knowledge. The newest physical therapy procedures would be implemented more effectively by allowing the patient direct access to physical therapists.
The quality of the student entering our program, as well as other programs, and the direction they receive in our curriculum produce competen~, independent thinking practitioners who work well in the medical community. I urge you to allow the public direct access to the expertise of physical therapists by supporting Senate Bill 31.
~ January 10, 1987
R~: Senate Bill # 31 Clay Edwards, Fhysical Therapist
MONTANA CHAPTER OFTHE
AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION
SENATE HEALTH & WELFARE EXHlBlT NO, _--'-' 7~ __ _
DATE / -=-_/L - f L • BILL't> . . _.S&J.-'-
TC: :,~ada:::l ChairIT.an and members of the Ser;.ate :Fublic Health CO!!lrr:i ttee
... I Y:2.nt to briefly explain to you what I believe the p2.sSage of this Jill ~ill do to the practice of physical therapy and what portion of t~e ~ublic ~ill Bost benefit froE the pa2sage of this legislation.
ill During the t'l'JO and one-half years that our state association has been drafting this legislation it has been, and still is, my personal
. belief tl::.at the prEctice of physical therapy will not change d:~2...-::2.t-lilt icall:T .... ii th the passage of this bill. Vie viill continue to see cC-SC';.b
of our p2.tients by rr:.eEns of physicicm referral. Vie will continue to ; !l2.Ve the very close working relatio~.ship we have 2.lvI2.;:,TS had with Ii. :physicians.
The ne::1cers of the public that will be dranatically and po si ti vel: r
...... c~ffected fall into several g:.:oups. There v!ill be a major imrrove:::-:ent ~ treatment for handicapped s~hool children. Fhysical ther2.~ists are the only mambers of that tr2atment team that need a physici~s
i referral. I personally have now waited 3~ ~onths for a surgic2.l .. re-y;ort and doctors referral from a childrens hospital so I car.:.
legally and safely cow~ence treatment for a student.
~ Another group that v!ill benefit by cost and time savings by going cirectly to a physical therapist are those patients with chronic physical problems. Patients with arthritis, nonoperable neck a.."'ld back L. rain, nonacute strokes and many other chronic disabilities will ce able to gGt immediate treatment. In reality, many of these patie::ts non go directly to the physical therapist 2.nd the referral is only a
~ telephone call to the doctor from the therapist.
Injury prevention is rapidly becoE2ing a major focus of business a.."'lc. L industry. Physical thera~ists are ideally educated to present low back - injury prevention seminars and are indeed doin8: so. These SeLlin3..rs
have the potential of reducing Vlorlanens compens2tion clai!:'~s and. paJ,,:::ents ; considerably. Am I cur;:'entl~~ breaking the 12.'[/ v!llen I present these II. prot;ra:ls? Possibly. I certainly 8..111 \-vhen the inevitable employee
remains to ask what they can tio for their chronic low back proble~. :,:y statements to him are now treatrr,ent and are illegal. I believe
~;: SC~Qtc 3ill ~ I]l::::v~/ ~C~ri2 .. I'Q2 --~,~'3 2
'~t:i~i,ll fL:.AUH & WELFARE
EXrL. i "J. .3 DATE /-/& - £ /' BILL NO. • 3> .8 ::1 I
r-h:'sical therapists are the most qualified persons in a community to :;;resent this information but "1,3 are about the only ones that car...r..ot lawfully do it.
The last group that I TIant to sinE,le out is the public in general. ~hero is now a major er:rph8,sis on wellness and health promotion in our society. Any physical education teac~1.er, aerobics instructor, YI'I~CA e~l~loyee, or anyone else C2.n open sho"9 and instrLl.ct and counsel ~eo}Jle on diet and exercise vii th almost no training. In most rural I;:o~ltana ci tie s and towns p the rl:/sical therapist or physician 8.re the nost qualified persons to yresent t~is infoTI~ation. The physici2n ~oes not have the ti~e and this anti~uated referral reQuire~ent prevents 2e from doin~ it.
I ur:Ie you to give this eill a e.o r:a.ss recor:L':lendation fron this CCill
::;.i ttee. The refe1"1"2.1 recl~~ rement for pnysical ther2.py has outli vea "i t .... need an"::! is 110"1 ""'·re"'ro-·"'+in~ 1:000. r:1e rli ci"'e T'at"er t"''"'n T'.T'o"11ot i nc- it - ..:) ..... L~.L __... ~' " ___ v ---0 C -:.. .1... \....-- _ .... - - J.~ .l.!.e.. J.- - 1.... ..1.J. b ..... •
,
MONTANA CHAPTER OF THE
AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION _ •. _ •• j~ "_,,L.111 01 V~ ... Lr/"ii\t
EXH,SlT [';0. --o/.,L-----DATE ___ -?:=/? - R L
To: Senate Public Health Committee ~ILb ~:0. 5I3-~ .. I. Re: Senate Bill 31, An Act Allowing Direct Patient Access to Physical
Therapy
Understanding the benefits to the public that Senate Bill 31 can provide by allowing the public direct access to physical therapy, to a large part requires the understanding of the profession of physical therapy. What is physical therapy and what do physical therapists do?
First of all physical therapy is an integral part of the medical system. This is certainly demonstrated by our history and development over the last 68 years. Through this, the philosophy which guides physical therapy care has arisen out of medical and physical therapy research.
Physical therapy is not a new profession but rather one that is 68 years old. Through those years and as the profession has expanded physical therapists have provided a safe quality care to millions of patients. Our history indicates clearly that we have effectively treated patients and this bill will not change that particular aspect of physical therapy care. In actual practice, physical therapy care, as provided by licensed physical therapists, is done totally under the careful hands and decision making of the treating physical therapist.
Physical therapy is a profession that is rapidly expanding. Utilization is also rapidly increasing. The public, as well as other health care providers are realizing that for many patients, with a variety of problems and conditions, physical therapy provides a long term solution to their problem.
Physical therapists have considerable expertise in recogn1z1ng and treating limited bodily function resulting from musculoskeletal or neurological conditions. Physical therapy, and physical therapists, hold the philosophy of evaluating, treating, and educating patients to achieve optimum function as soon as possible. Perhaps most importantly physical therapists are able to expertly advise, and educate, individuals to understand their condition as well as how activities they do throughout the day working or recreating can effect the continued stress on the body that could result in prolonged injury. Physical therapy has an important preventive emphasis that in the long run can be very cost effective to consumers and third party payors.
- 2 -
SEN,,1t lb,LlH.lj ".Lt,,~ [XHi..;" "J - I _ ~ Z-DATE / - if BILL N~. :=> t3 3 '-
Physical therapy is a team oriented profession. We are very cognizant of the skills of other professionals and will continue to work closely with those professionals with the primary goal of quality, effective patient care. Certainly core to that team approach is continued and ongoing consultation with the patient's physician.
Physical therapy is a profession made up of individuals that share the same internal and external problems and concerns as other professions. We have a vast majority of individuals that work hard to advance the profession for better patient care and certainly in the present health care environment for cost effective care.
...
Senate Bill 31 allowing direct patient access to physical therapy will not change the scope of physical therapy practice in Montana. Physical therapists will continue to practice physical therapy only, a field that only physical therapists are best educated in. We know our profession well and we also know the boundaries that limit our profession. The long history of our referral and communication relationship will continue with physicians and other health care providers for quality patient care. For those individuals who choose to seek the services of a physical therapist initially to address their problems, Senate Bill 31 certainly provides ~ them that right which could result in early intervention and safe and effective outcomes.
Physical therapy is a profession that can be trusted. It is a profession that has provided considerable benefit to the public for years and it is a profession that the public should have direct access to. I urge you to support Senate Bill 31 that will allow direct patient access to physical therapy.
Respectfully,
~'o/~:J~ Gary Lusin
(
ASSOCIATES
,. ~ o "II
"' 1/1 1/1
o % • r-
% 1/1
DONALD F. LANG i PI<ESSfN'ATE HEALTH & WELFARE ~
n
EXHIBIT NO.~ ; - 0
October 29, 198~ATE ____ 1--=I-~ -e..tf > ~ PIlL ".' S~.J/ ___ ~
Mr. Kenneth Davis Director of the
Department of Practice American Physical
Therapy Association 1111 North Fairfax Street Alexandria, Virginia 22314
Dear Ken:
Re: Practice Without Referral
Our firm as a major administrator of Professional Liability insurance for physical therapists has been monitoring claims in those jurisdictions where practice without referral is allowed. Specifically, Arizona, California, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Utah and West Virginia. It is my understanding that California and Nebraska are jurisdictions in which the therapist has been able to practice without referral for a considerable period of time. As of this writing, we have no firm evidence that practice without a referral has had a negative impact on Professional Liability claims.
It would be normal, from an underwriter's approach, to expect that when the therapist is practicing independent of the physician, claim experience might be less favorable than that where a physician is involved. Again, we do not find this to be the case at the present time. I can only suggest to you that the professional therapist utilizes every viable tool available in order to provide the patient with the best care possible. I would also suggest that in those areas where practice without referral has been allowed, the truth of the matter is that the therapist counsels with the physician in cases where there would be any questions whatever as to what might be proper in the handling of that patient. The less p~ofessional therapist is going to be more subject to losses w1th or without the restriction of requiring physician referral.
IoCAIN OFFICE ms ""CM'GA" AVENUE. CMICAGO. Ill. 6()60.1. {J'21'27·'",. AO""N'SHUTIVE OHICE. 2'3! WIS':0",5'''' AVENUE. WASMINGTON. 0 C .2OOC7
-9-~,,- RMPAP,' 4C4W!i3P04A'J4.$ ==_4 1Q4J! .C,..... .$A is e&Q!&. le. sa ....... ".4; a 4. ;; ·r ."l ...... _ .• -
-< o ~ II>
.'
, .... ( ( .. ,,; _ " ... _, ,lit ... '-"-
EXHil:li l Nu. s::_ DATE /-1( ~1,7 BIll NO. :2 f3:5 I
Dear Ken: October 29, 1985
The number of incidents in the entire physical therapy area has been steadily increasing, as have been the dollar values of judgments in malpractice actions. These two factors in addition to others have had a negative affect on the pricing of Professional Liability coverage for physical therapists, but again that affect seems tp be across-the-board and not a function of practicing with or without a referral. It i£ cur intent to continue to monitor our therapy program. Should we notice any significant change in those areas where practice without referral is allowed, you may be assured that ~e will contact your office.
ely.
- ;~-Dona1(;. Lang
DFL/cc
-10-
, \
'S£NATE HEJlLTH & WELFARE
"J< J'.,.- ""1 U ~BlT NO. ~ . \.,..1: &.0..,-1 II\' I ,~,DJlr0:" +"1-:=-J L
&"",\\,- 'k.L r..{';'1.t"u "\ '\ \ It ~ >
~> ~ CL~ ~ t~O'Tl'\ I ! $.8 .s/ NAME IS STANLEY ROSENBERG. I AM PRESIDENT OF ROSENBERG AND
P -w-k I p,;hF l6(: ~ ..., ~;-~.1~ .. ASSOCIATES, A PUBLIC HEALTH CONSULTING FIRM. I rIP± ~AVE WORKED IN lIV~
A REHAB. HOSPITAL FOR TWO YEARS AS A PATIENT AND STAFF
.. EDUCATOR. IN THAT FACILITY, I WORKED IN CLOSE RELATIONS~i'At..t.. SJ'/.JF/~ lt1c 1.,"/111'1 ~ ~ PHYSICAL THERAPISTS AS WELL AS OCCUPATIONAL THERAPISTS. I
HAVE ALSO BEEN A CONSULTANT TO NURSING HOMES AND HAVE BEEN
~ ASSOCIATED WITH LONG TERM CARE FACILITIES SINCE THE INCEPTION
OF THE LONG TERM CARE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM INITIATED DURING THE
NIXON ADMINISTRATION. THE PROGRAM WAS CANCELLED DURING THE
CARTER ADMINISTRATION. I SPEAK NOW AS A CONSUMER OF PHYSICAL .. THERAPY SERVICES FOR MANY YEARS BECAUSE OF A CHRONIC LOW BACK
~ PROBLEM. MY EXPERIENCE BOTH AS A CONSUMER AND AS SOMEONE WHO
HAS WORKED IN HOSPTALS AND LONG TERM CARE FACILITIES, I FEEL,
~OVIDE ME WITH SOME CREDIBILITY.
& I BELIEVE PHYSICAL THERAPISTS WHO HAVE GRADUATED FROM .. ACCREDITED SCHOOLS HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE REQUIRED TO PRESCRIBE THE
"it .. NEED FOR AND TREAT PATIENTS WHO BENEFIT FROM PHYSICAL
THERAPY. PHYSICAL THERAPISTS ARE TOUGHT TO RECOGNIZE WHAT THEY
.. CAN AND SHOULD NOT TREAT AND WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ORDERS ,eo I
RECEIVED FROM A PHYSIATRIST,' A PHYSICIAN WHO SPECIALIZES 11/
DISEASES OF THE MUSCLES, RECEIVE ORDERS OR PRESCRIPTIONS WHICH
i. USUALLY SAY, "PROVIDE P.T AS NECESSARY." OR ,"P.T AS INDICA'I'ED"
THE PHYSICAL THERAPIST THEN BA~ CHOOSE$THE MODALITY OF
-TREATMENT, I.E. HEAT, ICE, ELECTRIC STIMULATION, DEEP HEAT 01' Vl-~tI.feVF"
,', USING ULTRA SOUND, ciR STRETCHING EXERCISES. "IN SHORT, THE t.
n~YSICAL THERAPIST IS TOLD BY THE REFERRING PHYSICIAN, DO WHAT ..,., YOU THINK IS NECESSARY. YOU DECIDE WHAT IS NEEDED AND DO IT~ .. THE NEED TO SEEK A PHYSICIAN'S REFERRAL IS UNNECESSARY
• , ',JI
.~M·l"t· ",,,Uti 6t WeLFARE .":>'-11 t\ llll-'
EXHiBIT !~O. --?C6=L---DATE I "./~ - ,I Z Bill NO. ..9 B 3 (
SINCE NOTHING IS ACTUALLY PROVIDED THE PATIENT EXCEPT THE
ADDITIONAL COST OF REFERRAL. AND, IT IS JUST THAT, AN ~ ~\\.svnl(t' ~ (JJ/
ADDITIONAL COST TO THE PATIENT. IF, THE P.T. FEELS A FURTHER
EXAMINATION IS NECESSARY, OR MEDICATION IS INDICATED, SUCH AS A
MUSCLE RELAXANT, THEY WILL AND DO REFER THE PATIENT TO THE
PHYSICIAN.
IN MY OPINION, THE NEED FOR A MEDICAL REFERRAL FOR PHYSICAL
THERAPY IS ANTIQUATED PRACTICE AND SHOULD BE DISCARDED.
W h (I -I m d {U.."" ,~", IJ .~ e I S- i D ha ". e +lw p.T. ell ~ '/ YJoJ e... ct-.-re4 e ~ l.-L h t? I"l ;-'11 d I (-'i ~ leI ()
to p
eop
le w
ho
are
...
•
livi
ng i
n a
nu
rsin
g h
ome,
p
erso
nal
car
e h
om
e or
re
tire
men
t ce
nte
r •
rela
tive
s an
d f
rien
ds
of
resi
den
ts
• re
pre
sen
tati
ves
of
com
mu
nit
y g
roup
s or
p
ub
lic
agen
cies
•
emp
loy
ees
and
ad
min
istr
ato
rs
of
care
fac
ilit
ies
r
Wh
o to
con
tact
for
O
mb
ud
sma
n s
ervi
ces:
Sta
te O
mb
ud
sma
n
P.o
. B
ox 2
32
C
apit
ol S
tati
on
Hel
ena,
Mo
nta
na
5962
0
Tol
lfre
e P
ho
ne
Nu
mb
er
1-8
00
-33
2-2
27
2
All
con
tact
s ar
e k
ept
in c
onfi
den
ce.
Loc
al O
mb
ud
sma
n
Cal
l y
ou
r lo
cal
Are
a A
genc
y o
n A
ging
or
yo
ur
Co
un
ty
Cou
ncil
on
Agi
ng
4,00
0 co
pie
s o
f th
is p
ub
lic d
ocu
me
nt
wer
e p
ub
· lis
he
d a
t an
est
ima
ted
co
st o
f 7q
; pe
r co
py,
for
a to
tal c
ost
of $
280.
00,
wh
ich
incl
ud
es
$280
.00
for
pri
nti
ng
and
$.0
0 fo
r dis
trib
uti
on
.
Mon
tan
a's
Lon
g-te
rm C
are
Om
bu
dsm
an
Pro
gram
.~
Om
bu
ds-
,
l wh
at?
J 7-r~
Thi
s pr
ojec
t w
as f
un
ded
by a
gra
nt
from
th
e A
dmin
istr
atio
n o
n A
ging
W
ashi
ngto
n, D
C
_hel
p r
esol
ve p
rob
lem
s ..
. to
th
e co
nce
rns
of
peop
le w
ho
as
soci
ated
wit
h l
ong-
term
car
e li
ve i
n l
ong-
term
car
e fa
cili
ties
. su
ch a
s A
n o
mb
ud
sman
can
help~·
• ex
erci
sing
res
iden
t ri
ghts
re
side
nts
no
t o
nly
un
der
stan
d '
•
qual
ity
of c
are
and
lif
e b
ut
exer
cise
th
eir
righ
ts t
o w
ith
in f
acil
itie
s r-
good
car
e. O
mb
ud
smen
are·
• ad
min
istr
ativ
e de
cisi
ons
imp
arti
al I?e
dia~
ors
:whe
n an
d p
olic
ies
they
loo
k In
to s
Itua
tIon
s of
r-
. sta
te a
nd
loc
al
con
cern
to
resi
dent
s. I
f g
rou
nd
s fo
r co
mpl
aint
are
fo
und,
om
bu
dsm
en m
ove
into
'-'
acti
on.
Th
ey m
ay s
uppl
y in
form
atio
n, s
ugge
st s
olut
ions
,
and
pre
ss f
or a
ctio
n o
r ch
ange
o
n b
ehal
f o
f re
side
nts.
-- -
. .
serv
Ice
agen
CIe
s •
Med
icai
d, M
edic
are
and
oth
er l
ong-
term
ca
re p
rogr
ams
• ab
use,
neg
lect
or
expl
oita
tion
of
resi
dent
s
pro
vid
e se
rvic
es.
. .
• in
form
atio
n ab
ou
t lo
ng
term
car
e -
serv
ices
, ca
re i
ssue
s an
d
pla
cem
ent
opti
ons
• re
ferr
als
to a
ging
se
rVIc
es p
rogr
ams
• as
sist
ance
for
lon
g-te
rm
care
sta
ff t
o h
elp
th
em
mee
t th
e n
eed
s an
d
conc
erns
of
resi
dent
s •
educ
atio
n to
en
han
ce
publ
ic a
war
enes
s an
d
use
of t
he
long
-ter
m
care
sys
tem
•
advo
cacy
for
nee
ded
le
gisl
atio
n an
d p
olic
ies
• p
rom
ote
th
e d
evel
op
men
t o
f co
nsu
mer
gro
up
s
Family Practice
Norman A. Fox. M.D. DIPLOMATE. AMERICAN
BOARD OF FAMILY PRACTICE
John S. Patterson. M.D. DIPLOMATE. AMERICAN
BOARD OF FAMILY PRACTICE
Robert J. Flaherty. M.D. DIPLOMATE. AMERICAN
BOARD OF FAMILY PRACTICE
Leonard R. Ramsey. M.D. DIPLOMATE. AMERICAN
BOARD OF FAMILY PRACTICE
11tedica! ~JJociateJ, 7'. e. A Professional Corporation
SEVEN EAST BEAll. BOZEMAN. MONTANA 59715 PHONE: 406-587-5123
SENATE HEALTH & WElfHlE tXtIHm NO -+-?--DATE L~M - t;7 BIll NO... (.,f 8 ?>I.
January 9, 1987
Senate Public Health Committee CapItol BuIlding Helena, MT 59604
Dear Committee Members:
Pediatrics
Paul H. Visscher. M.D. DIPLOMATE. AMERICAN BOARD OF PEDIATRICS
Eric Livers. M.D. DIPLOMATE. AMERICAN BOARD OF PEDIATRICS
James R. Feist. M.D. DIPLOMATE. AMERICAN BOARD OF PEDIATRICS
Todd D. Pearson. M.D. DIPLOMATE. AMERICAN BOARD OF PEDIATRICS
A bIll before the LegIslature would allow the publIc greater access to the servIces of Physical Therapists. Currently, the publIc has free access to the rudImentary physical therapy offered by ChIropractors, who lack training In tradItIonal medical discIplInes. PhysIcal TherapIsts, on the other hand, are traIned In and familiar wIth tradItIonal medical concepts of physIcal therapy and could provide much more appropriate treatment for patients. If the case can be made for the public's free access to Chiropractic care, then there Is no question that the public can clearly benefit from freer access to the care of registered Physical Therapists.
Sincerely,
Robert J. Flaherty, M.D.
RJF:sw
KENNETH V. EDEN, M.D.
:~;', ... oIl-filiH & WtlJAR£
fXiUBIT NO, 7 DA1E-_,_/-/t -~:/
INTERNAL MEDICINE - GASTROENTEROLOGY HILL.. .£ B 3 .{ ... -
MEDICAL ARTS BLOCK III N. LAST CHANCE GULCH. SUITE G
IlELENA. MONTANA 51J60 1
Members of Public Health Co~ittee State Senate Helena, MT 59601'
Dear Senators:
January 9, 1987
'.,i
TELEPHONE (406) 442·1994
I would lik e to express my support for Senate Bill 31 r~gardi~g free acce&~ of patients to the care provided by Monta~~ phy~i~al therapi~ts.
11 my own practice many patients are referred by n:e fo!' evaluation by a physic.<'I.l therapist, and! have found them as a group to be well trained, con~cient{ous and to render their services in a very professional ~nner.
In reality, many patients self refer to a physical. therapists and then request authorization retrospectively. In almost all cases, I do this.
I think the present law in unrealistic and discriminates unfairly against physical therapists since patients have free aCC~2S to others in the h~\lth care field such as ,chlropractors, 'acupuncturists, optometrists, naturopath:;" wld etc. Aruong these groups, I think the physical therapia,s are perhaps the mose .:i.ilr;l'!ly to refer patients whose problems are outside their area of expertise.
I think the risk of physical therapists failing to recognize a problem that is beyond their area of expertise is a real one but certainly no more so than it is for physicians or any othel."health professional. I think one must rely on professional integretity of which physical therapists as a group have demonstrated an ample amount.
Sincere'ly yours,
K~nn£th V. Eden, }1.D.
KVE/dr
•
ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATES OF BOZEMAN, P.S.C. 206 NORTH GRAND
BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 PHONE 587-5546
SENATE HEALTH & WELFARE EXHmlT NO .. --,.7'---__ _ DATE. J ~ l~ - 8- 7 Bill NO._S {5..:3 /
E. LEE BLACKWOOD, M.D. FRANK W. HUMBERGER, M.D. BERNARD M. VARBERG, M.D.
January 15, 1987
Legislators of the 50th Session State of Montana Capitol Building Helena, MT 59620
Dear Sirs:
After reviewing Senate Bill No. 31, an Act allowing direct patient access to physical therapy and amending Section 37-11-104, M.e.A., I wish to state that I am in favor of this bill allowing physical therapists to evaluate and initiate treatment of patients without the direct prescription of services by a physician. I feel that physical therapists in general are much better trained than chiropractors who have direct access to patient evaluation and care. It has been my experience that they use good judgment in their evaluation and treatment plans and are prompt in referral if they
~ are concerned or have a problem. I feel good in giving my unqualified support for this bill and would encourage its passage.
Sincerely,
Frank W. Humberger,
FWH/mj
, ..
Testimony - Senate Bill 31 ...,::i'. d: dLr1Lni 6t Wc.Lff\RE
CH .... , i .:0 _' g= Submitted by: Dr. LeE Hudson
Great Falls, Montana DATL_ /-?~ )} L
08U.l NO. = rf? ? I , F"
January 16! 1987
Senators of this committee; good afternoon. My name is Dr. Lee Hudson. I am a Board Eligible Chiropractic Orthopedist and a member of the Board of Directors for the Montana Chiropractic Association. I practice in Great falls.
I would like to make it clear that we do not want to attempt to prohibit anyone from practicing the profession which they are trained for. Trl8 question at hand today is not whether the Physical Therapy profession is a worthy profession. It has a proven place in the health care community. The qUEstion we must ask today is whether the Physical Tnerapy profession has the education and training, most importantly in diagnosis, tc become a portal of entry/primary health care provider. For the first and most important step in treating the human body is making a proper diagnosis. Only after a proper ciagnosis has been made, can a treatment plan be formulated.
I have researched the similarities and differences in ed~cation oetween my profession (Chiropractic), and the Physical Therapy profession. I have not included the Medical profession in my research, however, Medicine and Chiropractic have comparable educational requirements. ~
I have obtained course curriculums from two major Physical Tnersoy programs, (Utah and Washington), and the curriculum of my Alma Mater (Northwestern College of Chiropractic).
1. 80th Chiropractic and Physical Therapy require a minimum of two years pre-professional training.
2. Cniropractic pro~ession training is a four year program. Physical Therapy professional training is 8 two year program.
3. The Physical Inerapy programs researched ~ere comprised of between 880 and 1,110 total hours of education. The Chiropractic program researched was comprised of 4,411 total hours of education. This is 4 times the total class hours.
-1-
--;. . ' ...
Last but probably most importantly;
. ~t:.LFAKt '"E. '\ . uri ~ ~t\, r\ I t to"
EX"I;I1;;.;l J £ /' .".
OA1 ~~ (2 -< I.~ B\LLNO,~
4. Chiropractic education includes 1,260 classroom hours which are directly related to diagnosis. The Physical Therapy programs researched contain between 120 and 180 hours of courses which can be related to evaluation or diagnosis.
I would also like to point out that the edusation of a Physical Therapist contains 0 hours in x-ray diagnosis; a very valuable tool.
SENAi£ Htf\UH & Wi:.LfA
CAPITAL CHIROPRACTIC CENTER OOUBIT NO. 9-I
GAJN P BlOM, DC
1732 PROSPECT A \IE NUE DATE. J - It - cf Z HELENA, MONTANA 59601 - ~ B 3 I " Bill NO,~, 'c
PH!L!P ,Ii.. BLOM, DC, FICC (406) 449-74S8
January 14, 1987
'-;-he r~~)ntana Chiropractic Association believes that the physical therapists Oefl~]tely are not qualified to diagnose or evaluate. Their education does not teach this and therefore they do not have the qualificaitons.
t·1any pathologies can mimi c musculo-skeletal problems, therefore it is essential that a differential diagnosis be made. In addition to physical, neurological, and orthopedic testing, a radiographic examination should be utilized.
Physical therapists do not have the qualifications to perform or interpret ,\:-rays. Manycancers, fractures, and other abnormal i ties are found through use of x-ray. These are various contraindications to using physiological theraputics such as heat, massage, ultra-sound, and mobilization especially if certain disease processes are present. These contr6.indications of treatment must be pointed out through precise diagnosing. We believe that this legislation is not in the best interest of public health.
Chapter 26.
.... , . " :SENATE HEALTH' ~.WELFA~:~;f~~:f: db *' b' ..... , '1-1( .. ~---<~-""""'-EXHtBIT iio.. '/GJ';.'-.,' ................... •·
DATE )- /te' ct:Z BILL NO.~SL.....L8~3""-'-/_-
_.--.,
THE GE:\ERAL PHYSIOTHERAP\SCB~IISSIO:\
I::\TRODLCTORY i. The ::\ew Zealand Society of Physiotherapists. in associatlon \.,.itn th,,~
:\ew Zeabnd ~lanipuJ;Hi\'e Therapis~s' Association and the ::\eW Ze2.i:l.nd Priv~te Physlotherapists' Association. was represented ;it almost a:l hearings of the Commlssion. The submission of the societySubmi;;~ion ~51. induding the material supplied ill connec:ion with it, W<l5 :"ost ;.:"eiul to us. The society also helped to provide experts from over!>eas.
2. :\Jthough the conclusions reached bv the ::\e\\ Zealand Society of PhYSIOtherapists and its associated gr~up-; were not in favour' of chlroorac:ic. we should like :0 record that the stand take:: was a const~uca\'c one. The physiothe~ .. pists 5a\",; themsel\'es ;~:; criLles oi chiroDractic. not enemies. It did seem, too. that some da\' all ~peci;.tlis[s in man~al therapy. whatever their background. might be abie to work together ;:1 further research. However, at present, physiotheraplsts are aligned wlth the '\1edicai Association in opposing the provision 01 health benefits for chiropractic patients.
3. It was nOteworthy that the group oi physiotherapists specialising in manual [he rap" were responsible for prep:lring the material for the submission. They also presented it and were therefore ~wa;.lable for c:-os~examination. This · .... a~ valuable sillce, apart i;-~m ,be ch,·:Jpr2.Cl'_,r". ,::t" '~ere better informed on the use of manual therapy than :.my other gro:..li) who appeared. Although, in generaL they echoed the iT:edical oppositio:-t, they were more specific and were aiso prepareG to make sug~estio:1::; ~G~)'...:t integrating chiropractic into the heaith system. They aiso sa\\ '11:, ilt't'e ;, .. ,.
research into manual therapy.
EDCC,-\ TIO::\ OF PHYSIOTHERAPISTS 4 .. -\t this point some~h!ng needs La be ~aid about [he f:CUcZlr:on c!
physiotheraplsl3 and. irl panicuiar. of manip;Ji3,lj~'e !.herapists sine:: the\' maintain that thev ar{' capable of pro,'idinl:: .'ill the ~en:ices no\, !l, ... ir.:v periofmr"d h:. chi~opracto~s. .- .
5 .. :\ 3-\'ear full-limc.~ourseisoikr_(Od for thr! Dlplomaof Physl,::;tI1erapv. 't~:i1iird:Oi the,,;purs.c:;\,lf9().h9ur~,f~llu~JJ$.sP~ti(ii:!.4i;1~9ii.pr,acr;,~e.,.
\;~J~$~~:tt~~~t£M~~Ji~~{i~~\i~Sc~~~~~~1kli~ti~~}~~ ~ . ~6muCh.Jessdem3.riarng;;''lf'hcii",-;ai'5--·e-nler ·(r3.l·rli~:; ~~n 1979 and in s'ub5eq'uent'''~;''ea;s'' '~i1I"pr0h;lbi\' have a preregistratiuD YI:;).:- alte
~:;~~~:~~;,i~~~~;;;t~~:;;;;7J~1iIr~~]\~;';,;~t;nnh~~~ibh'g(a parar!Iecl.~caLHe IS taught the ba~lc SCle:lCeS as :t general background to ni';: rt)j~ within the framework pro\'ided by the rekrrin~ m(dic;l doctor. Ohviuusi· .. <)nce he is in pracuce, hospital or pri\·ate. tj~,.,,\t;j.1L.:;:.~~.d
~r:.fL~.e~:::::.$r2:v~·-4:~.·,~~,f8J.V~~iljt~~iof,!,ptJh!=p-'1rit;nt.;~Jljl~.J.hf\Y;hlk,.9~:~lS' ¥hy.slC?0e~aplSt',· ~s speaa!lm portanceipa!tlcularlY:~ln~,"m;-;:h,hSPlt~.i ~.ltlng:, HIS niam ~ethcxls ~f tre.1tmen.t are electro-therap:" tne~a.pe~uc mO"crIl~lll' ,'1 .. ",<:,1; .. ' ''''er-n:'' ' ___ 0._- ~~"~~P ~nrl ""'''bll'C~'',..,n
T ... ~ •. v.~~ .~4I-,t},.'1!0-,·.~_ L-:,~t",>":,~:,:,,,,:"" .... ~~, .. ; __ ~.:'-~·~~')..llooLb~~_~";·""w ... ~,:·:·.~ ... ·· .. ~:- .. ~"-'- .. 't,. procedure::;. r~~;t::~~1~. 'phj,~:~the!'ap¥. ed).!c.~QQn. ~"'!uli 1l9,s.'grilfiCa<l.1 ..
I
IV/}
o
CII
AI'
lLR
~"
r
tl' ,.l
ini.
I,.,
,II d
iik
l.n
L:;
,l
diai
;II':J
. ... i~
; .. d
OC
l/.,U
Oi-
ht..:
.phy
./ii
u.th
ClA
lPi.
d14Q
.lx!
_J
l}r~
~~i}!,er'\ ,r
:f p]:'mfir};h~iJ!!u::srtJ:;i\lort'"vl'r,\Vr
1I0
1c'
11
t;\1
thl'
staf
f o
f.th
· r'
!'>~I"rllt'r;lp}
' \ .
. t.C
><l!
~ atl
' ti
ll!
III~
.II.
I)
'.l·
ul"
:I',
J
:\1';0
11
fr(J
ttl
},:I
II.l
ltlW
.
\ I"
'I' •
• ! 'I
;tfl
. :,
v('ry
J~""
.hi1
.Vl:
~~Il
:Ulh
C;th
olg\
..tm
)·OJ
l{1
l/lt
ph
~'S~
()t!
lf;f
apy.
:$
..
j ,f"
~~~~
,::"
:",·
:~~"
,,,.
:k.~
~:";
'~''
''''
'''·
''''
''~~
\o..
.a .. A~~~'~~
~~~ (
II J i '
_' .•
t, l
:
~."""'_li:. ..
.. ",.
'
IHA
I0iI
;-;(
; iN
t\
IAN
II'U
I..\
T!V
E T
IIE
HA
I'Y
7.
\\'c
' (''
'ill
t'
no
w t
o t
rall
tln
g i
ll t
1tal
lipu
!ati
\'(,
the
rap)
", t
o u
se t
he
terr
n
adc'
l'l(
'd I
» ti
re phy~i()therapisb. '1
his
i.>
,.k
fill
ed b
y t
hn
ll t
o be
IlI
UV
eIlH
'nt
of
jili
n'"
lit
') l
ind
"w
il
IHII
lIla
l p
assi
ve
rang
t'o T
he b
a!>i
,'S a
re t
aug
ht
earl
y,
hili
Old
) ill
til(
' la
st y
ear
i<; S
Olll
e li
mit
ed i
nst
ructi
on
giv
ell
illl
llan
ipu
lati
on
, il
ldut
iil'L
·. I
II,'
join
ts o
f th
e sp
ine.
g,)
lh i
ll N
ew Z
cala
lld
.\I
Id i
ll E
ngl'I
IHI
the
ill~
lrll
< li
llli
ap
pealn
l 1
0
b('
eiel
llt'
lIla
ry,
nell
cr
ud
e.
At
St.
Th
om
as'
il
l L
()nd
, '".
nT
II u
lld
er !
\Ii%
J.
Hic
kli
llg
wh
o h
as
so m
ud
l in
flue
llce
d N
ew
I.c,
tlal
ld
t1w
lap
ists
, th
t'
trai
nil
lg ap
pean
'd 1I
I1st
ruct
un~d
. II.
II
I '''
;t'''
Z
eala
lld
, p
hy
sio
ther
apis
ts w
i~hi
llg
tl.l
spec
iali
se i
ll tl
tis
ficld
lI
lust
U
lld
!'ll
,ik
e th
e p
ost
-gra
du
ate
cu
urs
e arr
an
ged
by
tlt
e N
ew Z
eala
lld
!\
L'l
lil"
t1.l
Iin
· T
hera
pis
ts'
Ass
oci
atio
ll.
\V"
hav
e b
rid
ly d
i:;(
'uss
ed I
his
in
Cb.
lptl
'r
:J T
he
(ou
rse
n';
tch
es
Ihl'
stan
dald
s of
th
e Il
ller
nat
ioll
al
1,('<
1<'1
dll
lO" o
f O
Jlh
np
ard
ic !
\lal
lip
ul,
Hi\
'c T
hel'
ap
y a
nd
tll
I're
is
11
0 d
ou
bt
thai
."
"",.
'~
,.\\
Z
rala
nd
p
ract
itio
llel
s ale
h
igh
ly
skil
l(·d
.
II ..
i1c,
.1
c!~,
tb
e C:
~'li
lJli
i".i
llll
h .. ,
rr .. ~
~rya.tj(!11li.~t!<}.I~ttbs,~~·~~i,rl wl.
~idl
}
pI.I Y
Slo
lb·r
af~ls~
". as
. a .. , :.
;.~.~.9U
P ... ,.~~q
I~.;~,r ... , .. e.
}.t!f
t. l.·
m. ' • .i.
~~~l?,
Ul ... ~,t. ~r~
... :;~.:r~ ...• m
. ) .... !lg
....
)1.'.:
~ .• ;5¥;a
r.~ :J1
i' > 9
\ug
ht
! ('.r:ll!llqu~~~~~,A?~r'~~~119 ,.
t.'~
~H~·
mm,t
~i;a
.t~:
~!l~
~~Y'
«;::
'. pra.~u-.,;,...iJa_~~~upl!r-v.sf!d~ .
. ~ei
orc;
i:th
ey.~
~~f~
~~_!
,).,
ti[~
1f}e
'1i!
,. ,
he
' .. ( .1
111111
'" 1
I.1
l li
as
it ;.
~lm~!a~n;~rr~'i~t,~p,:, ~~
4t~h
~~:~
PfSl
lfa,
l~.p,rac:m~p:,:r?~;
. ,.
tIl,I
. \'.
I, II
(. ·f:
a !c
'i~,
J!r~
l!1~
~g, }
ll: fa
s;~,
(,:q
~lS!
~~~t
~~l.
r~~i
:,~~
l~~~
~~~p
in~
a itU
(I
t! I!
" r
1JlM.lfiut~tf9«-t,C\f.~}·:~~, '
~!lnshf4(.~~0iV£j:t.h.(f,~;f~~le?,t ,
:;s;~#
m;:~!;
A tn
. au
iIll
l ta ti
\'~
M;;I
.,liw
n.i2
.t',.l
l .... .
J\~ii:{:iit:N'O;;~ ~.
;;:.:L
ii;:~~
C:r;.r
"'it:-
...·::
.A::lr
o'ni'!
\r.-tR
r -
. .
"'~e
i:..
j,,~
.,.~
~~ ....
.. ·m-,.&K~..
"~~!-l.,..;l.ii;;r:.::-_~~
UO
::....
"l·h
e tr
~lIl
llll
g u
f pli>siut
JH~l
api,
15
ill ;t
n'a~
III
IlI'r
,h,
m l
lIal
lJpi
lfat
lve
thn
ap
\ Jt
~akcs.J!tI"I~.:vqyx.a.
l!l,
a~k ~1
(·m~
)e~{
lof.
tpf:
;9-e
alth
te~Il~.Jt \
\'oil
id
,~('t.'1
1l11; "
[' rt1l
"~: ;<
;\10. :.H
l<;l ..• ;
l:~m~-
:7.I:)
~~~t.~
.•. t~l.(
,. 1!·.e
."~erg
.. I .. ~ .. es .. '.: .
...•.. ~~tf
.. r.Jro
.. rnot~ng ... , ..
J.).d.
?r,~r
,~
)Tg:
ll.I
".d
1l\~
:dH:
I~~e
;:r(
~~:J
{(~~
'f~.
9rp.
h~'5
1~~:
:~r.
~y~.
1lt"
!!:1
.-".
o~Jm
prOV
1{l~
jj;
tM'it
ed
ucau
~?U:
<\$t
il*'
iiM.
~aii
l ~~
...,
.;A,
"i ...
....
....
.. ;.!;
Qi~~
:,\~~ ii .... ~'i;;;~;.Jr
~#'...
...,
.:-t
;..0
. __
~~~/~~
(:R
ITIC
IS!\
l 0
1'
(:f1
IR()
I'R
:\C
TJ(
:
. I 1
. Y,
l:., 'I
':' l:
er,~}.li~t". 0
H,'
;::i
C
djll j,i
" <
.uk.
b(;
~:<}
,~:W
. ~ h
(.;¥c ,
q\l~~d
qll,_.
tJI~·,
!;::,"
::;'
~nplt
Ih.·
HaU
lin
g o
{ Ch
lr.:
lpl·
dctO
J~ a
nd
,' hI
:; sC1q~Jbc;IiA!U~"tm:~£l
!!#;
J' . .t.h~~r~
.I$:.l
....;d
l as
Ih~,.way:."Jiti""hilt.thdr·grul.lud.J.iiJlell t
ryin
g t
o y
;lIid
;111
' th
osf
·.
thcc
JI
i."
II,
'\\"
\C'I
, :J
." "('
C!i~t'lIs"
Ia t"
1 I,
k\ (
II ('I
'J
Il),
theC
llir
opra
<;lQ
r~.~
;J~"
~;~i~~
!·:~:~
~i~~t~
~~~~~~
~/~i~~
~j~:\.
~i·~;~
~~ti~~
ikil~~~t~~~&~~YiP
fully
i,
i-ch
aptt
"r 3
7 \\
'I~t c
ntll
'isll
I'>
of
the
lI/l
(k.-
lyillg
scit~
lItifi
c bas
is o
f th
ilo
pla
( Ii
,' il<
;f'lf
. t\
s fu
r lh
t"
aS51
'1 ti
on
lh
al
clli
lOpr
aCI(
)fS
"s
hif
t tl
H:i
r g
llll
llll
'"
\\t'
Ita"
t'
tUll
cbu
l o
n th
e p
oi:
" il
l 1
'/J:
ll't
IT H
, p
ara.
17
It
is
all
;u g
llll
ll'l
I I
th.1
t k.H
b 1
I" ..
.. h
l'le
. 't
call
SlI
pp
ort
th
t' v
iew
th
ai c
hir
op
r,tt
:to
rs
ale
lI
dtJ'
,I~.
it
,;\1
1
!'<
I'la
lly
SlI
Pl,
ilrt
!l
w
\ in
\'
!lla
! th
t,y
h,
jv('
li
lt'
0P
CI!
'
Ilti
l)(J
.-d
dl'I'
I',:
\t·l
t (I
I ri
te
<;,
i'·lI
lis\
. I:
!. I'
ll;"
i. ,I
ht'
l al'
i ~ ts
ni
I i( i~e
I lit
' ,j I
I,~ !
,. IIl
C Id
" I j!
Y 01
tll
f' "h
i r"p
i al
'lm
.u
ld
(·"I
II(l
.II"
il
. ti
l th
e la
llfT
's
di';<
tt!\
,all
tagt
:,
h·il
l!
thei
l O
WII
ra
ng
e "I
11
1':11
111(
'1)1.
II
i~
to
tle
that
N
t'w
It
'ala
lld
d
lirt
Jl'l
'I<
·IO
h
(lh
pll
gh
lU
ll
lIt'
cT~\
," d
v :
--;"
nl.
'1
)('1
iea
ll 0
11
1'.
,) C
Oli
Ii II
". tl
l(,l
II~c
I\'c
s II
) m
anu.
1I t
lwra
py
\\
IW
II·.I
·, p
h)
\11
J,";
,PIs
tS !
II;I
)' u
ttiI
S('
lw
ac I
:.~h(, 1
IItl
c,~I
,-~"
IIJt
1~1
watr
r ..
_ ..
_ a
il'
_n'w
l ..
. _
.,
~
_\.
CII
AV
I'E
K
:tti
I""'
.,
, 1
~ ~
I ....
. /
1....
I..
J I<
lWI'
VI'
I',
un
less
p
lty
sio
thrr
apis
ts
wis
h
to
enco
llq
lge
a d
up
lica
tio
ll
,.1"
d
loll
, W
I' Sf
'c' l
Ioth
ing
oh
jl'c
lio
nab
le i
ll t
lte
ch
iro
pra
cto
r's
cho
icr
of a
!li
llf,
;k ~
lI
Ioda
lilY
in
wh
i .. h
he
spl'
Cia
lise
s as
IO
llg a
s h
e is
ful
ly i
ltfo
rlll
ed o
f th
e" v
aili
f'
o!
phys
iotl
H'1
ap
t'u
t it:
IIlI
'th
od
s am
i of
th
e ci
rcu
llls
tan
ces
wh
ere
they
;\1
('
ind
icat
ed.
All
op
en a
ttit
ud
e t
ow
ard
s re
ferr
al b
etw
een
ch
iro
pra
cto
rs a
lld
p
hy
sio
ther
apis
ts
is
Ihe
bes
t sa
feg
uar
d ag
ain
st a
ny
dif
ficu
lty
th
at
lIlif,
;t.1
~~
( . I
:1. ~anLial
Ih('
rap
y
in
the
han
ds
of
ph
ysi
oth
erap
ists
, it
is r
xp
lair
)(',
I. ~es
tr{'
aln
len
t lo
r th
e ex
trem
ity
jo
ints
, n
ot
just
th
e sp
ine.
T
heil
p
ract
ilim
lc, S
off
er a
to
tal
rnu
scu
lo-s
kel
etal
th
erap
y,
wh
erea
s, i
t is
c1
aim
!'d
. ~h
il'l
)pra
ctor
s are
lim
ited
to
th
e sp
ine,
\V
e h
ave
alre
ady
sta
ted
th
at
cu
rren
t ch
iro
pra
cti
c
cou
n,e
s p
rov
ide
ad
eq
uate
tr
ain
ing
in
ex
trem
ity
jo
illl
p
roce
du
res
(sec
ch
ap
ter
38).
T
here
is
1
10
le
gal
im
ped
imel
1t
t"
ch
iro
pra
cto
rs
tre;
llin
g e
xtr
emit
y j
oin
ts,
an
d
man
y d
o.
14.
Ph
ysi
oth
erap
ists
are
co
nv
ince
d o
f th
e v
alu
e of
m:l
Ilip
ul:
Jtin
n a
.,. I
arg
ll('
st
roll
gl)
, in
it
s fa
vo
ur.
H
ow
cv
er,
.\S
CC
;,D
Q
nee
d.
fQl'
un
dl;
('
. so
ph
isti
cati
un
int
hi~
tieJ
.~' "I
t is
ou
r sl
an
e
. ~","huien,·u!l~rm. A~
ii ~!~!P ......
. ljt>Si~lOlIld
no
t h
e al
low
ed
to
hcco
rJIl
' sh
rou
ded
ill
II
l11l
t'ccs
silr
y so
ph
isti
cati
on
wh
ich
lea
ds
to o
ver
clai
m i
nev
itab
ly a
nd
thi
., I
, p
arti
cula
rly
so
wil
h r
egar
d t
o t
ed
llti
qu
es"
(T
ran
scri
pt,
p.
13
(4).
Cle
arl
\'
t/re
rc
are
tw
o
dis
tin
ct
an
d
stro
ng
ly
hel
d
pu
iuts
01
v
icw
: th
at
of
tlte
p
hy
sio
ther
apis
t an
d
that
of
the
chir
op
ract
or.
I S
. T
he m
anip
ula
tiv
e th
erap
ist
lear
nin
g h
is t
ech
niq
ues
as
he
do
es i
ll a
Ir
agm
ente
d f
ash
ion
, fi
rst
ver
y s
ket
chil
y a
t a
ph
ysi
oth
erap
y s
cho
ol,
th
ell
ill
a ('
ou
rse
SPI c
ad o
ver
3 Y
C<l
rs o
r m
ore
in
sm
all
sect
ion
s, c
on
tell
ds
that
wh
d.·
p
ract
ice
is c
ssen
lialt
here
is
lill
ie p
oin
t in
ov
er-r
dil
ll'l
llC
llt
of w
hat
i~
0111
" I
slri
(~ll
y li
rnit
c'd
ran
ge uftcchlli(!,Jes"e~~~i~p'~~ct~r.on (h~()!her han~j.
;'~~
:;;~
rt;;
;;]t
~ft~
n~tu
~.a·
··~~
ft~k
~the
o.~i
~~~;
· \l
CY;h
te.y
~Uef
ore
lle
use
s th
ese
tech
ruq
ues
, u
nsu
per
vis
ed,
on
lii
spall
en
ts,
i'il
usi~
wlth
ftl
l'!lw
r p
racti
ce g
ive
him
a g
reate
r ~b
ilit
y to
hel
p t
ho
se p
atit
;llt
s.
~*!f$Ll}L~sn~~ .~ .. ,b;e.qc:J1.}l~ ~~
i~I~
(:a~
('~1
]:U~;Sp~!\p":
fG.J
t IS
dan
llt'
('f
llia
idu
rop
racto
rs o
ver
-rel
i'il
e n
Ick
sTul
l. A
t tl
te s
alll
f'
lill
ll'
it
is
allt
-gcd
th
at
thei
r te
chn
iqu
e co
nsi
sts
mai
nly
of
the
"dy
nam
ic
thru
st".
T
his
is
cl
aim
ed
to
be
dan
gero
us
bec
ause
it
is' a
su
dd
en
hig
h
\'d
ot:
ity
1l
l0V
('IIW
llt,
Ihe
pati
en
t can
no
t se
e w
hat
is
bei
ng
dO
lle,
Cal
l1ll)
1 r(
';.is
t th
e th
rlls
t, a
lld
is
ther
efo
re a
t th
e ch
iro
pra
cto
r's
mer
cy.
Un
til
tl ..
. (:
oltl
llli
s~io
ll s
aw c
hir
op
racto
rs a
t w
ork
it
imag
ined
fro
m s
uch
descriptioll~
IIla
t Ih
is
wa
s
tlil
' o
nly
w
ay
Ihe
ch
iro
pra
cto
r o
pera
ted
w
hil
e th
,.
ph
ysi
oth
era
pis
t/m
all
ipu
lati
ve
ther
apis
t w
ith
h
is
gel
ltle
d!f
ti~l
a~)I
I-t •
. ex
ten
sio
lls,
or
Ilio
hil
i\al
ioll
s w
as I
I \,
IT}
' d
iffe
ren
t pra('tiliOlI!'r=TI~
tr&
fh ~,
that
wh
ill'
th
e '€
1.ti
~lU;
e(l~
l,.~
~!.;
;. .. r
~,A!
!d~;
.~~A
A:~
." . "
ilk;;.
pC
! hap
s Il
IOH
' S
II
Ihan
tJlI)~la-ilipuiati'f.e t
rler
apls
i,'?
Dle
ar
c-al
~r.
usu
ally
~ma
ll ~nq
.. Drc(;i~~·
.' T
he
mo
st f
orc
efu
l m
anip
ula
tio
ll
w
aw ~rr
e.;.
""
t~t'
=···
~·~"
''''
''''
'''
I .
. ~
pcJ
ioll
lle(
J)
Y II
ILln
ll'II
1a 1
\'('
t
lera
plst
'>.
t ;:J::>
1.7 ..
'. \. '.
h .. i.I
I.' 11 ..
lt' ...
. l'h)
.<;i
fllh
t'rap
iSls
a~ser
tcd th
at ..
pat
if'I.
lt. ~ a
. r.I'
\I
a .
I1I1
"t:'
,1
1\ ~,~
:fr'~f
!::al\
{~~ . .!~
~~~~
i!!W
jtD I
,>y d
liro
.1Ia
.((O
!<;, ~i
gt;!
1~ j
t 'I
ll.
war
1I,il11!j~li&!?H
tJl¥X¥lY~ali(rwe f
tnd
thal.l~l~9.Pf!~~!!·~
"'"
.
f .
,.(i
t l'
ltaj
ltn
l!tf·~\t'l'i{tZ~T'lt) n
idcll
l'('
wh
it'
v·()
\iI'
tlju
stif
y iis
-,it
I(~'I
(,(J
llcl
llti
ed "
inv
;li
luu
t ti
lt'
safe
ly o
f sp
inalm
all
ual
ther
apy
('
I'l'
lict
ilin
lln
s Il
ther
th
all
ch
iro
pla
cto
rs,
It i
s as
ton
ish
ing
hn~l.
_ Ilf
th
e p
njc
Tlc
d
tI'C
hlli
'lllt
':-i
,HC
w
ho
ever
th
e practitioners~ ...
.. e. ~j) t\t
'I~
IIH
li'(
' <
,s.to
llis
hi,.l
g h
ow
IIl
laW
are
lh
ey ;
rre
of
this
sim
ilari
tyl 'w
e\le
~whi
le
nt"lW
iir,H
f a **
'1ph
ys~i
II.r
,pi"
lld
_al .t
1lilJr,,
'ho
iii
II
SB 31
SENHi [ HU\UH & W£LFARf EXHIBIT ~:O . ....... /f-£..I ___ _
DATEt--~/--?-/.~~_-~1-7-BILL NO._;l..,.L-II(3-'-... ..3"'"'-+-,-
ALLOWING DIRECT PATIENT ACCESS TO PHYSICAL THERAPY
TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION OF THIS BILL BY:
MONTANA ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH UNDERWRITERS
MONTANA ASSOCIATION OF LIFE UNDERWRITERS
PREPARED BY:
MARIE DEONIER, Registered Health Underwriter (RHU) President, Montana Assocation of Health Underwriters Chairperson Health Insurance Committee,
Montana Association of Life Underwriters Member Legislative Committee, Montana Association
of Life Underwriters Legislative Chairperson, Montana Association of Health
Underwriters
As claimsd are paid for "medically necessary care" it is our feeling that this bill will jeopardize claims payment to our clients covered by the majority of health insurance plans written within the United States.
MEDICALLY NECESSARY CARE is defined as "any confinement, treatment or service that is prescribed by a physician".
Therefore, if there is direct access to the physical thereapist without having this treatment first prescribed by a physician the claim for treatment would more than likely be denied.
Therefore, on behalf of the many persons within the State of Montana who are covered by health insurance that could suffer refusal of claims payment due to this legislative action we recommend that this bill NOT BE PASSED.
~--~
~C7r:~:ejJrJ/~ MARIE DEO~ ~ MD/mp ,'-
, "
WITNESS STATE!-1ENT
DAVID UCKHAN
ADDRESS 1400 Winne Avenue Helena. MT 59601 443-349/.}
., 1'- .. _i"U H & Wt.LFARf
.. ,\~lliJi i :W. -t,,£/-,<"'c----DATE /- L'b"... £ 4: BILL NO~ Ii C3 '3 I "
SB 6 BILL NO.
1/16/R7 DATE
WHOM DO YOU REPRESENT? Hontana Public Health Association
SUPPORT xxx OPPOSE AMEND
PLEASE LEAVE PREPARED STATEMENT WITH SECRETARY. SB6 Requiring Hospital Ad~inistrator to request anatomical gift. (Lybeck) 1/16/87 Senate Public Health
Corrunents: 1:00 P.M. Room 410 10 There is an acute shortage of organs for transplantation; especially
kidneys •. Recently a priest in our diocese died because a kidney was not available
when needed. His condition deteriorated until it became too late for one •.
2. The cost. to medicaide an1 medicare. of the kidney dialysis program is
approaching two bi1lion rlollars per year. Incrp-asei transplantations would low~r
this cost dramat:cally.
We consider this to be :J:'Rtinhx:p.x dpsirpable lpl!isla~,ion. It would rpsult
in ~aking people more a~are of the nep-ri for or~ans.
CS-34
"'.;.". j t IitAUH & WiLfARE £"H:u., ;!'J / 2--- ~ . DATE __ -~--/h -)= '/7 BILL ~''1 __ 3 P; '5 /
;
DEFINING PUBLIC HEALTH
During the 1983 legislative session, I was asked to define public
healthi especially the role of the laboratory. Some legislators
wondered where I would next appear. They were f2:'jJt!..d1 f
confusedi.
when I promoted the public health laboratory. My first
involvement in this field was in 1929. After 55 years of concern
in the field of public health, perhaps my testimonials were
somewhat overdrawn. Now, I have again been requested to define
public health- so here goes:
PUBLIC HEALTH is the art and science of preventing disease,
prolonging life, and promoting physical and mental efficiency
through organized community effort. This concerns the physical,
social and economic well being of all persons. Of prime
importance in this effort is the PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY.
Virological, bacteriological, serological, and physical science
testing is done for the prevention and control of communicable
and other diseases.* Chemical, radiological, and microbiological
testing is also done to assure the safety of water, air, and the
physical environment.
* e.g. hereditable diseases
A more detailed discussion of public health may be found in:
Encyclopedia Brittanica, 15th edition 1974, Macropedia V. 15
pp 202-209
David Lackman, Legislative Lobbyist, Montana Public Health
Association. January 19, 1983 - reprinted February 26,1985