mir contamination observations and implications to … · i~ figure 1: the russian mir space stati...

8
I,.. . ) 'I " u Mir Contamination Observations and Implications to the International Space Station Carlos E. Soares, Ronald R. Mikatarian Source of Acquisition NASA Johnson Space Center The Boeing Company, M/C JHOU-HSll , 2100 Space Park Drive, Houston, Texas 77058 ABSTRACT A se ri es of external contamination measurements were made on the Russian Mir Space Station. The Mir exte rn al contamination observations summa ri zed in this paper were essential in assess in g th e system level impact of Ru ssia n Segment induced co nt aminati on on the International Space Sta ti on (ISS). Mir contamina ti on observations include res ul ts from a series of flight ex periment s: CNES Comes-Aragatz, retri eved NASA camera br ac ket, Euro-Mir '95 ICA , retrieved NASA Trek blanket, Russian Astra-II, Mir Solar Array Return Experiment (SARE), etc. Results from these experiments were studied in detail to characterize Mir induced co nt amination. In conjunc ti on with Mir contamination observati ons, Russian materials samples were tested for co nd ensa ble outgassing rates in th e U.S. These te st results were esse ntial in the characterizati on of Mir contamination sources. Once Mir contamina ti on sources were id entified a nd characte ri zed, ac ti vities to assess the implications to ISS were impl eme nted. As a result, modifications in Russian materials selection and/or usage were implemented to control contamina ti on and mitigate risk to ISS. Keywords: co ntamination, Mir , space stati on, spacecraft, materials outgassing 1. INTRODUCTION As international agreements on th e Russian participation in th e International Space Station (ISS) program were fina li zed, the integra ti on of Russian hardware with the ISS configuration became cri ti cal to th e program. In th e area of extern al contamination, it became necessary to assess th e co mp atibility of Russian hardware with the ISS system level requirements l . Of primary importance was to mai ntain th e environment specified in th ese requirements as ISS hardware a nd payloads are designed to operate within this environment. In order to assess Russian hardware compatibilit y, it was first necessary to characterize the contamination sources in th e Russian hardware, analyze the contam in ation induced by these sources onto ISS contamina ti on sensitive hardware, assess comp li ance with requirements and implica ti ons. The Russian space station Mir was the focal point of initial in vestigations on th e induced contam in a ti on environment. 1 NASA , Spac e Station External Co ntamination Control Requirements, NASA SSP 30426 Revision D, 1994. ·1 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20100033530 2018-09-27T06:19:29+00:00Z

Upload: vukhue

Post on 27-Sep-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

I,.. . ) 'I " u

Mir Contamination Observations and Implications to the International Space Station

Carlos E. Soares, Ronald R. Mikatarian

Source of Acquisition NASA Johnson Space Center

The Boeing Company, M/C JHOU-HSll , 2100 Space Park Drive, Houston , Texas 77058

ABSTRACT

A series of external contamination measurements were made on the Russ ian Mir Space Station. The Mir external contamination observations summari zed in this paper were essential in assessing the system level impact of Russian Segment induced contamination on the International Space Station (ISS).

Mir contamination observations include resul ts from a series of flight experiments: CNES Comes-Aragatz, retrieved NASA camera bracket, Euro-Mir '95 ICA, retrieved NASA Trek blanket, Russian Astra-II, Mir Solar Array Return Experiment (SARE), etc. Results from these experiments were studied in detail to characterize Mir induced contamination.

In conjunction with Mir contamination observations, Russian material s samples were tested fo r condensable outgass ing rates in the U.S. These test results were essential in the characterization of Mir contamination sources.

Once Mir contamination sources were identified and characterized, ac ti vities to assess the implications to ISS were implemented. As a result, modifications in Russian materi als selection and/or usage were implemented to control contamination and mitigate risk to ISS.

Keywords: contaminatio n, Mir, space stati on, spacecraft, materials outgassing

1. INTRODUCTION As international agreements on the Russian participation in the International Space Station (ISS) program were finali zed, the integrati on of Russ ian hard ware with the ISS confi guration became cri ti cal to the program. In the area of external contamination, it became necessary to assess the compatibility of Russ ian hardware with the ISS system level requirements l

.

Of primary importance was to mai ntain the environment specif ied in these requirements as ISS hardware and payloads are designed to operate within this environment.

In order to assess Russ ian hardware compatibility, it was first necessary to characterize the contami nation sources in the Russian hardware, analyze the contam ination induced by these sources onto ISS contamination sensitive hardware, assess compliance with req uirements and implications.

The Russian space station Mir was the foca l point of ini tial in vestigations on the induced contamination environment.

1 NASA, Space Station External Contamination Control Requirements , NASA SSP 30426 Revision D, 1994.

· 1

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20100033530 2018-09-27T06:19:29+00:00Z

I~

Figure 1: The Russian Mir Space Stati on

Mir contami nation observations were made during the 14 year lifetime of the station. These observations stem from a series of flight experiments: CNES Comes-Aragatz, NASA STS-74 camera bracket, Euro-Mir '95 ICA, retrieved NASA Trek blanket, Russian Astra-II, Mir Solar Array Return Experiment (SARE), and many others. Some of these experiments were flow during the NASA Phase 1 program, also known as the Shuttle-Mir program. External contamination data was collected during each of the 11 Space Shuttle flights which span a four-year period.

2. CNES COMES-ARAGATZ FLIGHT EXPERIMENT The Comes-Aragatz flight experimene was deployed and retrieved during spacewalks 13 months apart (from December 9, 1988 to January 11, 1990). The experimen t was returned to earth on February 19, 1990.

During most of this timeframe tTie Mir station consisted of only the Base Block and the Kvant modules. The Kvant 2 module was only mated to the complex on December 1989. It is important to note the size ofMir, and its implications to the Comes­Aragatz observati ons, when comparing resu lts with other Mir flight experiments.

This fli ght experiment consisted of fo ur panels; which exposed samples on both sides. One side was identified as the "V" side and the other side was identified as the "R" side. The materials exposure experiment was mounted on the Mir Base Block (also referred to as the Mir Core Module), on the narrow conical section near the center of the Mir Core Module.

The temperature range for the panels is estimated to be from -60o/-70°C (coldest, experiment in shadow) to +lOo/+30°C for the V side, and from -60o/-70°C to +50o/+60°C on the R side. The atomic oxygen fluence is es timated to range from 3.6x1Q20 to 5.9x1020 atoms/cm2 for the R side, and from 3.7xlO18 to 7.3x 101 9 aloms/cm2 for the V side. The so lar vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) radiation exposure is estimated at 2850 ESH for the V side and 1900 ESH for the R side.

The resulting contami nant deposit was identified as an SiOx layer superposed with a carbon/oxygen layer of unspecified thickness:

• Average contaminant deposit thickness measured on the R side was 350 ± 50 A • Average con tami nant deposit thickness measured on the V side was 780 ± 50 A

These results are consistent with the estimated exposure to so lar ultraviolet radiation and atomic oxygen: The V side received the least amount of atomic oxygen f1uence and the highest amount of UV, maintaining lower temperatures.

2 Guillaumon, J.c. and Pai llous, J .M. , "Flight and Laboratory Testing of Materials in Low Earth Orbit,"

3. NASA STS-74 CAMERA BRACKET During the Phase 1 program (Shuttle-Mir), a camera bracket was mounted on the dockin g module fo r 4 months. The brac ket was exposed [Q the Mir contamination environment fro m November 19, 1995 through March 27, 1996.

The camera bracket side with the heaviest amount of contaminati on had a view of the Spektr module . The side with the lowes t amount of contaminati on had a view of the docking module and the Krystal solar array, with a peripheral view of the Soyuz, Kvant and Mir Core M odule.

The camera bracket was exposed to one Mir so lar cycle (period with no time in shadow las ting several days) on January 6, 1996. Temperature, atomic oxygen fluence and so lar UV exposure were not estimated fo r the camera brac ket. The brac ket was made of a luminum coated with A-276 white paint.

X-Ray Photoe lectron Spectroscopy (XPS), performed at the NASA White Sands Test Facility, showed a contaminant deposi t identified as an SiOx layer consistent with polymethyl siloxane and S iOi . The measured contaminant depos it thi ckness was 12,000 A ( ample 00IB). This is equi valent to a condensable outgass ing rate of approx imately J x 10-11 g/cm2/sec.

The camera bracket exposed samples showed a substanti al layer composed of primarily silicon and oxygen in an atomic ratio of I to 2. There was a carbon layer at the interface between the top layer and the bulk materi al.

Sample 001B showed a thick layer composed of silicon and oxygen with a carbon-rich layer at the interface with the bul k materi al. Sample 002B showed two distinct layers composed of silicon and oxygen separated by a carbon layer.

4. EURO-MIR '95 ICA FLIGHT EXPERIMENT E uro-Mir '95 began in September 1995 and was completed in March 1996. rCA QCM miss ion data was available from October 1995 through January 1996. rCA was part of the E uro-Mir '95 ESEF pl atform. lCA was located on the end-cone of Spektr module.

Two Quartz Crystal Microbalances (lCA QCMs 1 and 2) were directed a long the Spektr module ax is (at the time thought to be fac ing ram). One QCM (lCA QCM 3) was directed pe rpe nd icul ar to the Spektr ax is (thought to be fac ing the nadir directi on).

-0-- A$lra-l 1 KMVI - -- Allra ... 1 KM\Il --6-- leA QCM I ICAQCM2 ~JCAQCM] - -. - - a.~r .. Br.tCket

• ICAMat . SIIflllIc2 . K:A ~'hll . ~l.:.l

I(ill) --Tlfn!inSh*!oW (II1If1 .)p.:r\X'lIlltl Ortlll

f~lo~ 40

-1400'1

~ r~--Io~~ "[\ t'l~/ J5

-~ IlOCO

1\ n II ](I

-"": .\ 7 10000

\ / / 1. Y J5

~ 'E

II'XX> II 20

~ 'I · • I

a ~

= IS ~ [ I '><>< ,{>o- -E .

p""- i I A"" -~-Q

""" 10 :;r.

lr-Jl V ------ , -- c

-- ;:

"'" . -- 5 --r -------- I

0 - 0

/C~"JS I II6H5 IlnoNS 12!4!9S 12IIJth/:'i 1111-)6 III$f:016

o.~

Figure 2: Euro-Mir '95 lCA QCM Measurements and Mir Time in Shadow

Significant increases in lCA QCM frequency measurements correlate well with Mir attitude data and increase in temperature due to "solar cycles" (time in shadow) . Pressure readings from within the Spektr endcone indicate significa nt materi als outgassing from wi thin the non-pressurized endcone.

Location: 44, -1 , 38

Direction : 0, 0, 1

View Factor to:

Spektr 0.1194549

Spektr SA 0.0225548

Figure 3: View from rCM QCMs 1 and 2 and Viewfactors to Spketr Modu le and SoJar Arrays

D'ates ,.i . N'ov: 7-16, 1995 ",Jan. 7~,11 , 1996 OCM 1 deposition rate 1.2x1 0-1O 7 .8 x1 0-11

(g/cm2 /sec) ". OCM 2 deposition rate 1.3 x1 0-1 0 8 .5 x1 0-11

(g/cm2 /sec) OCM 1 derived S pektr 1.0 x10- 9 6.5 x10-1O

I outgassiPlg rate (g/cm2 /sec) OCM 2 derived S pektr 1.1 x10- 9 8.0 x10- 1O

outgassing rate (g/cm 2 /sec)

Table 1: rCA QCMs 1 and 2 Depos ition Rates and Deri ved SpekLr Module Outgassing Rates

." .' .

L'Jan. ,7 ';:1 :1. 1996 ; Date's . Nov. 7-16 , 1995

Observed OeM 1 deposition rate (q/cm2/sec) 1.2x10-1O 7.8x10-11

OeM 2 deposit ion rate (g/cm2/sec) 1.3 x10-1O 8.5x10-11

, OeM 3 deposition rate (g/cm2/ sec) 1.8 x10-11 3.0 x10-11

Derived OeM 1 derived Spektr outgassing 1.0 x10- 9 6.5 x1 0- 1 0 rate (q/cm2/sec) OeM 2 derived Spektr outgassing 1.1x10-9 8.0 x1 0- 1 0 rate (q/cm2/sec) OeM 3 derived Spektr outgassing 8.9 x10- 1O 1.5x10-9

rate (q/ cm2/ sec)

Table 2: lCA QCMs 1 and 2 Depos ition Rates and Derived Spektr Module Outgassing Rates

5. RUSSIAN ASTRA-II FLIGHT EXPERIMENT The Astra-II QCMs have been operating since June 1995 . Disruption due to Progress impac t. Astra-II is located on the end­cone of Spektr module, on the opposite side from the ICA fli ght experiment. One Crystal Microbalances (KMV 2) is directed along the Spektr module ax is, facing the Mir core. The second QCM (KMV 1) was directed perpendicular to the Spektr ax is (Zenith direc tion).

Mir Contamnation Observatio ns

1000>

I I 11\ #J A A f\ J "L I

(\A f\ I

(\ 1\ 1\ 1\ A A A \ V V l ~f IV \ I. I V I V \ \ f \ VI \

-

~ VI V I V I

-- ~/ ---f-

JO

1400>

10000

A L------~ .4-

~

~ I

~,\jtna·l1KM v]

run 1l

...-- fit ---- A'Ura·IIKMV2

- -6-- 10. QCMl

!/ r --.- ICA Qo.u ~ICAQCM3 - --- - C;uro:ra !nek.:!

.£ H~Y • ICA MILS~1c 2

..0- . 10. M IlLSllfIllie I ... ~ I - - TUT&:: ~ 9llldow (nin .) p.:r90rrio . Or"bil I I II I

10

9117/95 1112')'95 1131196 4/Y'16 SI7/1J6 10~% 121 1\/% ])121'11

Figure 4: Astra-II QCM Measurements and Mir Time in Shadow

Location : 31 , 1, 30

Direction : 0, 0, -1

View Factor to:

Spektr 0.2771924

Spektr SA 0.0413169

Core 0.0845588

Core SA 0.0652032

Kvant 0.0068475

Kvant SA 0.0215639

Progress 0.0011795

Progress SA 0.0012173

Priroda SA 0.0300060

View Factor to Spektr/Core/Kvant: 0.3685985

\ \

\ . \.

..... . ~ .. .....

Figure 5: View from Astra-II KMV2 QCM and Viewfactors to Mir Hardware

Dates

5/29/96-8/2/96

8/2/96-9124/96

10/29/96-11/12/96

12/27/96-117197

KMV2 deposition rate r

. (g/cm~/sec)

7 .0 x1 0-13

1.5 x10-12

8.3 x1 0-12

6.6 x1 0-12

1.9 x10-12

4.1 x10-12

2 .3 x10-11

1.8 x10-11

, .:

;/

/

Table 3: Astra-II KMV2 QCM Deposition Rates and Derived Spektr/Core Module/Kvant Outgassing Rates

6. MIR SOLAR ARRA Y RETURN EXPERIMENT (SARE) The Mir Solar Array Return Experiment assessed long-term degradation of Mir solar arrays , as we ll as external contamination and orbital debris environment.

7. MIR CONTAMINATION SOURCES

r-­I

Russian vac uum exposed materi als u ed in large-surface area applications were identifi ed , and further tested fo r chemical compos ition and characteri zati on of co ndensable outgass ing rates .

Materi als condensable outgass ing rate testing was performed according to ASTM E 1559. The tests were of long duration, typically 144 hours. Condensable outgass ing rates were measured fo r a range of temperatures (materi al sample and QCM receivers) . The outgassing rate data was curve fitted to account for time decay due to long on-orbit res idence times.

OUTCAS SlNC RATt)) . RUSS IAN MATERI~

/" KOS"; (. '0,701 KOS'" (. 4 ~701 J

1~~!~~~~~~~~~~!~~1~~~~~~~1~~~!~~~~ + AJ(; ·j 12(-40.7!1 )

+ .0.-111 (·40.30)

+ + llP\.C (H .a,)

l' . + t +')(~ + x AK·'7J(·20 . . 50)

. • ' }If., I " ~L I( · 4 0 , I !iO)

!~~~~~~~~~~~~E~~~!§§§i~~~'~~~'~~~~ . AK· H :\( ·20.125)

E E? 140 (.40.100) Russ ian ,tK ·S73 0 Ep.140 , ",,0..50)

o EP· 140 l-l fU OO)

Pa rm al Wrap (-10.30) a KO :l 191( . IOJO) / • ••• • •• •• + KO $191(. 10.10)

Lr> 12 !;~~~~~~E?~'~40~(~' 4~O' S~0)~~~~~!~~~~!~~~~~~~~~~~~ . KO ' 191(.4) .70) Russian Sela CIod1 (-40 , 30) ======i ~ KO' 1 9 1 (· ·1) .7ol

::t 0 _0 . I XR Cllbk(.lOJO)

a x x X :r: l,\ Parmal Wrap (.42,30) , • R Ca~-42JO)

I.&IJ~~~~~~ ~' 10, 31) Aus slanAK 512

ISS SPECIACATION I 71 .< )(

, ... " ~~~M~M.~' ~~~~~~~~~~ I. &IS +-----I-----I-----+----J.-----I----l-----+---~

'0 ,00 ,>0 200 '00 150 ' 00

1'1nw · ll oun

8. ANALYSIS OF MIR CONTAMINATION OBSERVATIONS Comes-Aragatz and Camera Bracket:

The effecti ve outgass ing rates to produce the contamination observed on the Comes-Aragatz experiment were estimated at 3.2 x 10. 11 g/cm2/sec for the R side and 7.1 x 10. 11 g/cm2/sec fo r the V side. The effecti ve outgassing rate to produce the co ntamination observed on the camera bracket was estimated at 1.2 x 10-10 g/cm2/sec. These results are consistent with typical large surface area Mir materi als and coatings ( uch as KO-5191 ).

KO-5191 (organic silicone based paint) probably was the major source of contaminati on since it coated a large compos ite sec tion on the Mir Core Module that was viewed by the Comes-Aragatz experiment. Another sili cone contamination source, although a lower order of magnitude contributor, is AK-573 (organic silicone based paint).

The PVC cable insulation and the BF-4 impregnated mesh (so lar arrays) also contribute to contamination, but these are hydrocarbon contamination sources.

The Mir complex was considerably smaller during the time frame of the Comes-Aragatz experiment. This is consistent with the lower contaminati on measurements observed on the Comes-Aragatz samples. Further, results from the Comes-Aragatz experiment are consistent with the es timated exposure: V side received the leas t amount of atomic oxygen fluence and the highest amount of UV, maintaining lower temperatures.

The higher rate inferred from the camera bracke t contaminant deposit layer is consistent with the higher source temperatures due to the Mir so lar cycle and the fact that the Spektr module was a recent addition at that time.

rCA Flight Experiment (Euro-Mir '95) and Russian Astra-II Flight Experiment:

L

"

The significant increases in lCA QCM frequency measurements correlate well with Mir att itude data and increase in temperature due to "solar cycles" (time in shadow). The effecti ve outgassing rates required to produce the observed contamination are consistent with typical PVC rates. PVC is used for electrical cable insulation on the Spektr module.

The pressure readings from within the Spektr endcone indicate significant materi als outgass ing from within the non­pressurized endcone.

Correlation of ICA QCM frequency readings with Mir attitude data and pressure measurements from within the Spektr endcone indicate that materials o utgassing and contaminan t deposi t re-release due to surface heating are the sources of contami nation.

9. IMPLICATIONS TO THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION The ISS External Contamination Team performed an assessment of -Mir external contamination observations, including analysis of data from several sources. Participants in analysis activities included Boeing, NASA, ESAJESTEC and RSC­Energia.

External contamination analys is was performed for every identified contamination source and deposition estimates were obtained for sensor and sample surfaces on Mir.

Results were instrumental in ISS Russ ian segment changes to ensure compliance wi th ISS external contamination req uirements, for example:

• Cable insulation on ISS Russ ian segment: Teflon instead of PVC • Replace high-outgassing KO-51 91 and AK-573 with AK-51 2 • Solar array lubricant: fluorocarbon instead of silicone

10. CONCLUSIONS Once Mir contamination sources were identified and characteri zed, activities to assess the implications to ISS were implemented. As a result, modifications in Russ ian materials selecti on and/or usage were implemented to control contamination and mitigate ri sk to ISS .

These acti vities also demonstraa: that the external contamination methodology developed by the ISS External Contamination Team is successful in identifying contamination sources and mitigating risks to the program. This methodology has been documented in previous publications (Reference 8).

External contamination analysis is performed for every identified contamination source and deposition estimates are obtained for all ISS contamination sensitive surfaces. The External Contamination Master Verifi cation Database summarizes cumul ative estimated deposition rates for all ISS sensitive surfaces. It is also instrumental in identifyi ng any potential issues.

Optical property degradation models have been developed to account for long on-orbit res idence time and VUV exposure. These models are semi-empirical (based on laboratory and fl ight data).

11. REFERENCES 1. NASA, Space Station External Contamination Control Requirements, NASA SSP 30426 Revision D , 1994. 2. Guillaumon, J.e. and Paillous, J.M ., "Flight and Laboratory Testing of Materi als in Low Earth Orbit," 3. Comes-Aragatz 4. Camera Bracket 5. Euro-Mir '95 lCA 6. Astra-II 7. Russ ian materials test data 8. ST AlF-99 paper