mississauga halton lhin/media/sites/mh/primary navigation/boardandg… · on november 20, health...
TRANSCRIPT
Mississauga Halton LHIN
Governance to Governance Session:
Governing for Quality
2
3
4
5
7
8
On November 20, Health Quality Ontario will host Canada's largest annual conference on quality in health care. Health Quality Transformation 2014 is open to everyone committed to improving the quality of our health
care system, including patients, providers and health system leaders.
Register now, and stay tuned for updates regarding keynotes, breakout sessions and speakers. Highlights of this year’s event include the awarding of the second annual Minister’s Medal Honouring Excellence in Health Quality & Safety, a keynote by the province’s newly appointed Deputy Minister of Health and Long-Term Care,
Dr. Bob Bell, and the popular “Quality on the Frontlines” sessions, featuring presentations on the best abstracts submitted from across the province and all sectors. For the full conference agenda, visit Health Quality Transformation 2014.
9
10
11
12
13
Agenda
14
Welcome and Introductions
15
Community Governance
Consultation
Group (CGCG)
16
CGCG – New Membership
17
18
September 24th
Governance Resource Centre • Established a Governance Resource Centre section on the new
Mississauga Halton LHIN website - located on our new
website under the Tab – for HSPs
19
Governance Resource Library
• Sponsored by the CGCG with funding provided by the
Mississauga Halton LHIN
• In the Governance Resource Centre section on the new
Mississauga Halton LHIN website.
• Includes articles, reports, templates, tools and frameworks
• Materials reflect current best practices
• You are free to download materials, edit and add to them
for use within your funded HSP.
• Disclaimer: The resources provided are only suggestions for your
consideration and use. Every board should make sure all of the
content is relevant to and works for their organization and to adapt
as necessary.
20
21
Mississauga Halton CCAC Board of Directors Role for Quality:
The Quality, Safety & Risk Desk Aid Date: September 17,2014
MH LHIN G2G Session
Dieter Pagani, Chair Mississauga Halton
CCAC Board of Directors
Agenda
1.Overview of Mississauga Halton CCAC Board role in quality
2.Quality, Safety and Risk Framework
• Sharing the Desk Aid as one sample tool
3.Collaborating with health system partners for system improvement
Board Role in Quality
For the Mississauga Halton CCAC Board:
• Board decision-making is guided by accountability statements, for example
• To patients/families for quality services and best practices
• To health system partners, for cooperation and collaboration
• To the LHIN, for performance of M-SAA*; participation in LHIN led initiatives; fiscal management; communicating gaps between needs of community and scope of services provided
• To the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, for compliance with
policies and regulations
• Board roles and responsibilities include • Quality oversight
• Risk identification and oversight
• The Board’s Patient Care Quality Committee • Assists the Board in overseeing/monitoring the quality of patient
care and assessing related opportunities and risks
• *Multi-sectoral Service Accountability Agreement
Quality Journey
CPSI: Canadian Patient Safety Institute; CQN: Community Quality Network
Quality, Safety and Risk Journey
To summarize organizational quality, safety and risk practices, we created our Quality, Safety and Risk Framework
The Desk Aid
To help everyone see how they contribute to quality care, and how their role aligns with others, we created a Desk Aid for each group
Customized Desk Aid
The Desk Aid for Board of Directors draws on the Board’s accountability and role statements
Collaboration for System Improvement
To illustrate how the Board acts on the roles articulated in the Desk Aid, here the example of “Collaborate with Health System Partners for system improvement”:
As a Board, we collaborate through:
• Governance 2 Governance (G2G) participation • Community Quality Network, part of Synergy West GTA • Regular dialogue with acute care and LHIN Board Chairs • Formal partnership with Trillium Health Partners
• Seamless Transitions: Hospital to Home
Questions/Discussion
We’d like to hear from you:
1. What questions do you have?
2. How can we help?
3. What examples of Board leadership for Quality do you want to share with us?
Ray Applebaum, CEO, Peel Seniorlink
Caroline Brereton, CEO, Mississauga Halton CCAC
Cathy Hecimovich, CEO, Central West CCAC
The Community Quality Network
September 17, 2014
An Update for the Mississauga Halton LHIN G-2-G Session
Kumee Rao, CQN Co-chair Jutta Schafler Argao, CQN Secretariat
1. The Structure for Collaboration
2. CQN Mandate
3. Current Priority: Shared Scorecard
4. Lessons Learned
5. Dialogue
Appendix:
1. Overview of Synergy West GTA
Agenda
32
THE STRUCTURE FOR COLLABORATION
Successful Collaboration requires Structures for Engagement and Communication
33
Structure Enables Focused Collaboration
34
COMMUNITY QUALITY NETWORK MANDATE
Successful Collaboration requires Clarity of Accountabilities and Roles
35
CQN works in the “grey space” between organizations
and helps to build capacity and capability for agencies
and the sector
HSP Board
• Corporate mandate and authority
• Accountable to the LHIN through accountability agreements
• Bound by specified legislation
• Expectations set by external organizations (MOHLTC, LHIN, etc)
• Role is direction and oversight
• Fiduciary, Strategic & Generative roles
Community Quality Network
36
• Voluntary membership
• Accountable through shared commitment to work together
• Expectations established and agreed upon by the membership
• Role is steering and advisory
• Strategic and Generative roles
CQN will make a positive impact at the
Governance and Operations Levels
Governance Explore common and
consistent governance practices that enable HSP Boards to effectively guide and monitor the quality of client transition points among the community sector
Focus on preparing the community sector for compliance with the Excellent Care for All Act (ECFAA) and ensuring appropriate monitoring and evaluation of quality within and across the community sector
Operations
• Explore opportunities to
reduce process/program and
practice variation and enable
consistently high quality
outcomes for target
populations who are
frequently served, or have the
potential to be served, by
multiple agencies – through
quality improvement or process/program innovation
37
Learning about the drivers for effective
Governance for Quality first, helped to create a
Network with shared focus and language – we
are now focusing on “Measurement”
CURRENT PRIORITY: SHARED SCORECARD
Successful Collaboration requires Shared Focus
39
Stages of Shared Scorecard Development
• Stage I - Level Setting / Learning (min. 6 months)
o Agreement on the attributes (Health Quality Ontario)
o Gathering existing definitions
o Agencies are sharing their results with each other
o Begin to analyze collective data for emerging trends or patterns
• Stage II - Explore Standardization (min. 6 months)
o Work towards consistent indicator, definition and algorithm where indicated
o Validate the menu of Indicators
o Where indicated, arrive at:
• Common definitions for each indicator
• Common consistent data collection processes
• Common understanding of meaningful system wide analysis
• Common CQN wide QIP?
• Stage III - Production of Evolved Sector Scorecard (tbd - 2015)
40
Shared Scorecard Dimensions
In 7 of the 10 attributes*, member organizations are already monitoring a number of indicators; this was our agreed-upon starting point
41
* Source: Health Quality Ontario (HQO) website, ** Accreditation Canada http://www.hqontario.ca/public-reporting/home-care/attributes-of-quality
Accessible
Accessible
Effective
Safe
Patient / Client Centred
Integrated
Efficient
Work Life** Equitable
Focus on Population Health
For Future:
Appropriately Resourced
Indicators for Sharing
• Client satisfaction measures (14) ranked #1 in “Patient/Client Centred”
• # of individuals using the service (12)
• % M-SAA financial indicators meeting or exceeding target (12) ranked #1 in “Efficient”
• % of Administration (11)
• #/% Employee Turnover (11) ranked #1 in “Work Life”
• #/% discharges (11) ranked #1 in “Integrated”
• Avg wait time from assessment to service initiation (10) ranked #1 in “Accessible”
• # Clients with at least one hospitalization (9) ranked #1 in “Effective”
• # Complaints (9)
• # Compliments (9)
• % Falls rate for Long Stay clients (8)
• # incidents (8) top ranked in “Safe”
• # Client serious occurrences (8)
We started with a menu of indicators that were already being collected, and from that menu (see Appendix), member agencies identified the following we could start with:
42
Indicators for Sharing (2)
A Working Group is in the process of fine-tuning the list–
here a glimpse of the draft
43
Quality Dimension Measure(s)
Accessible Length from referral to assessment
Accessible Length from assessment to service initiation
Effective # of clients with at least one hospitalization
Effective unplanned ED visits
Effective % patients with unplanned hospital readmissions
Safe # of incidents or risk events
Safe # of incidents or risk events that are adverse events
Patient/Client Centred Overall satisfaction
Patient/Client Centred Quality Care
Patient/Client Centred Loyalty
Integrated Adoption of Integrated Assessment Record
Efficient % M-SAA financial indicators meeting or exceeding
targets
Worklife Employee satisfaction
Worklife Employee Turnover
LESSONS LEARNED
Collaboration is as successful as partners’ willingness to learn from successes and failures
44
To quote our members…
• “There is a lot more common ground than I imagined; we all are interested in quality; the same indicator and/or outcome can mean different things depending upon the setting; the CQN provides an incredibly rich learning environment”
• “We have appreciated the training opportunities with (CPSI), the exchange of ideas and being part of a draft of a LHIN wide scorecard”
• “I’m taking the lessons learned about building a foundation for quality and sharing them at the Board and Leadership levels in my organization”
45
• Join us at our next meeting:
– Tuesday, October 7th
– 6-8 p.m.
– Mississauga Halton CCAC
– 2655 North Sheridan Way, Suite 140, Meeting Room #1
• Contact the Secretariat:
– Jutta Schafler Argao
– 416-780-7878
• Visit our Website – http://synergygtawest.com
If you’d like to join us, or if you have questions
46
Dialogue
• What questions do you have?
• How else can the CQN help to advance Quality in the system?
• How can the CQN support the governance practices for Quality in this LHIN?
47
Break
48
APPENDIX: OVERVIEW OF SYNERGY WEST GTA
Successful Collaboration requires Clear Purpose
49
Better Care through Community Collaboration
50
Vision
Together, the agencies seek out opportunities to leverage and
find innovative ways to build on strategic planning activities
undertaken by all three organizations in the best interest of
improving the quality of care in the community.
Guiding Principles for Collaboration
51
• Work related to this collaboration will be linked to and will build on local
system development work to date.
• Where possible, existing structures/forums will be used for planning and
implementation.
• Early and consistent stakeholder engagement will be a key element of all
projects.
• Planning and implementation will be collaborative and will engage
representatives from all impacted stakeholder groups.
• Each area of work will be informed by intelligence from both local and
other jurisdictional work.
The Journey Thus Far
52
Nov/11 CPSI Workshop
Nov/12 Hiring of Paula Blackstein-Hirsh With LHIN Funding Support
Strategy Session Confirmation of Quality, Diversity & IT/Back Office as Priorities
Feb/13 Governance Workshop
March/13 Inaugural CQN Meeting
Established Planning Team (Working Group)
Aug/13 Confirmation of Priorities for Quality
Feb /14 Election of CQN Co-Chairs
Jun/14 Shared Indicators Identified
Current CQN Terms of Reference
• To improve the care provided to clients through a collaborative and shared focus on quality
• Will develop, plan and implement a variety of projects to support the quality agenda of member organizations – create efficiencies by developing joint templates that can be customized
locally – partner on improvement initiatives that require the seamless integration of
more than one agency – partner on the resourcing of decision support, quality improvement training,
and other supports – organize forums for sharing governance and operational successes achieved
and failures/challenges experienced by individual organizations.
• All community-based health service providers in the two LHINs are encouraged to join the Community Quality Network – currently there are 23 member agencies
53
CQN Members
• Acclaim Health
• Balance for Blind Adults
• Canadian Mental Health Association – Halton Region Branch
• Canadian Mental Health Association – Peel Branch
• Canadian Red Cross
• CANES Community Care
• Central West CCAC
• Halton Region Services for Seniors
• Heart House Hospice
• Hope Place Centres
• Hospice Dufferin
• Mississauga Halton CCAC
• Nucleus Independent Living
• Ontario March of Dimes
• Peace Ranch
• Peel Addiction Assessment & Referral Centre
• Peel Senior Link
• Richview Community Care Services
• S.E.N.A.C.A. Seniors Day Program
• Seniors Life Enhancement Centres
• Summit Housing & Outreach Programs
• SHIP – Supportive Housing in Peel
• Victoria Order of Nurses
54
A summary of proposed collaborative
work, as identified in February 2013
55
Initiative Rank Order
Balanced Scorecard 28 Votes
Template for organizational Quality Improvement Plan 24 Votes
Joint Strategies to Build Organizational Capability for Quality Improvement (eg Jointly sponsored training program, shared staff, etc)
23 Votes
Tools to Support Completion/Execution of a Quality Plan 22 Votes
Quality Improvement Collaborative focused on a Shared Aim (eg Transition of Clients from Hospital to Community)
21 Votes
Online Repository of Evidence-based Practices for QI
18 Votes
Declaration of Client Values 13 Votes
Support Governance Practices for Quality and Client Safety (sharing successes and challenges, buddy system for Accreditation and Quality, developing a Board Quality Committee, etc)
11 Votes
Enterprise-wide Risk Management Framework 10 Votes
QI Readiness Assessment/QI Capability Inventory 5 Votes
Forum to Celebrate Successes 2 Votes
For each attribute, we have agreed to
shared goals and asked organizations
which of the menu of indicators they had
available and wanted to share:
56
Attribute Definition* Shared Goal Shared Indicators Accessible People should be able
to get timely and appropriate healthcare services to achieve the best possible health outcomes
Minimize Wait Times ☐Avg wait length from referral to assessment
☐Avg wait length from assessment to service initiation
☐Hospital discharge to service initiation time
☐# days waiting for service
☐# patients on the wait list
☐Wait time (LHIN metric requirement)
Effective People should receive care that works and is based on the best available scientific information
Minimize avoidable Hospital Readmissions and or ED Visits
☐# Clients with at least 1 hospitalization
☐ED Readmit Rates
*Health Quality Ontario
57
Safe People should not be harmed by an accident or mistakes when they receive care
Promote a culture of safety
☐# Client serious occurrences
☐# Adverse events
☐# Incidents
☐#/% Incidents that are medication errors
☐#/% Client files with a completed medication reconciliation at intake/admission
☐% Falls rate for Long Stay clients
☐% Long Stay clients with medication review in last 90 days
Patient/Client Centred Healthcare providers should offer services in a way that is sensitive to an individual’s needs and preferences
Individual clients services are sensitive to their needs and preferences
☐Client satisfaction measures
☐Caregiver satisfaction measures
☐# Complaints
☐# Compliments
☐# of individuals using the service
58
Attribute Definition* Shared Goal Menu Measures/Indicators
Integrated All parts of the community care system should be organized, connected and work with all healthcare providers to provide high quality care
Collaborate to serve clients
☒#/% Of Transferred clients who receive followup
☐#/% of staff accessing integrated assessment record
☐#/% service refusals
☐#/% of discharges
☐System Partner Satisfaction measures
Efficient Healthcare providers should look for ways to achieve the highest possible client outcomes using the most efficient services*
Leverage resources to optimize capacity*
☐% MSAA financial indicators meeting or exceeding targets
☐Efficiency targets achieved to support maximum investment in client care
☐% of Administration
☐Forecast/Actual Variance ($)
☐Unit cost of service
*Health Quality Ontario
Facilitated Consultation
59
Quality Improvement Plans
• Hospital QIPs – implemented
• Primary Care QIPs – implemented
• CCAC QIPs – first year 2014-15
• LTC Homes QIPs – first year 2015-16
• CSS and MH&A QIPs - TBD
60
61
Community Care Access Centre Quality Improvement Plan WorkplanThis worksheet has 3 major categories across row 5. Aim is the first category and it has 2 sub-categories under it. Measure is the second category and it has 4 sub-categories under it. Change is the third category and it has 4 sub-categories under it. All of the sub-categories are in row 6. There are links to the 3 main categories and to the major elements under each category found in column A. The links go horizontally across the worksheet beginning in cell B2. The data to enter in cell G7 and moving downward is numbered so press F2 to edit the contents of the cell and then type your information. There is a decorative image border at the bottom of this data table and it does have Alt text.aim measure change safety effectiveness access client-centred
Quality dimension Objective Measure/Indicator
Current
performance
Target for
2014/15
Target
justification
Planned improvement initiatives
(Change Ideas)
Methods and process
measures
Goal for change
ideas (2014/15) Comments
1)
2)
… N)
1)
2)
… N)
1)
2)
… N)
1)
2)
… N)
1)
2)
… N)
Effectiveness To reduce the
number of
unplanned ED visits
among home care
clients
Unplanned Emergency Department Visits: Percentage of home care
clients with an unplanned, less-urgent ED visit within the first 30
days of discharge from hospital
To reduce avoidable
hospital admissions
among home care
clients
Hospital Readmissions: Percentage of home care clients who
experienced an unplanned readmission to hospital within 30 days of
discharge from hospital
Client-centred
To reduce service
wait times
Five-Day Wait Time for Home Care:
Client Experience: Percent of home care clients who responded
“Good”, “Very Good”, or “Excellent” on a five-point scale to any of
the following client experience survey questions
• Overall rating of CCAC services
• Overall rating of management/handling of care by Care
Coordinator
• Overall rating of service provided by service provider
To improve client
experience
Access
2014/15
Safety To reduce falls
among long-stay
home care clients
Falls for Long-Stay Clients: Percentage of adult long-stay home care
clients who record a fall on their follow-up RAI-HC assessment
AIM MEASURE CHANGE
Space for additional indicators
Space for additional indicators
Space for additional indicators
Space for additional indicators
Attributes of a High Performing Healthcare System
62
Performance Measure
“A performance measure is a comparison that provides
objective evidence of the degree to which a performance
result is occurring over time.”*
• measures of performance must satisfy this definition if
they’re going to drive performance improvement*
63
*Stacey Barr - PuMP
Common Measures
• The Mississauga Halton LHIN Quality Committee is
looking for:
• measures that are standardized across programs/sectors
• that can be used in QIPs and
• that track to our initial focus on the attributes of Safe,
Accessible, Effective and Patient Centred.
• In light of QIPs which are organizational quality
improvement plans, we hope to develop at least one
common indicator per program/sector in each of these
attributes.
64
Common Measures
• Standardized definition and methodology for
calculation
• Clear enough definition for repeatability and
reproducibility
• Comparable for benchmarking with other
organizations
• Measures can stand in at both the system and HSP
level.
65
Common Measures
• These measures can stand in at both the system and HSP
level…as an example…
System Level Ministry LHIN Performance Agreement
(MLPA):
• Repeat ED visits for Mental Health
• 15.2% for Q4 2013/14
• Repeat ED visits for Substance Abuse
• 24.9% for Q4 2013/14
• If you are MH&A HSP, you can measure these rates at
your organization level.
66
Table Exercises
• You have been purposely placed at each of your tables
• We have tried to segment attendees by placing “like” with
“like” as best we could:
• Adult Day Services providers
• Supports for Daily Living
• LTC Homes
• MH&A HSPs
• Etc…
67
Table Exercise
• Choose a scribe
• Blank Paper and Pens are on your tables
• Prior G2G start on indicators provided at your table
68
EXERCISE:
Attributes of a High Performing HSP “Sector”
Part 1
• For your healthcare program/sector how would you define
what is:
• Safe?
• Accessible?
• Effective?
69
Example – HQO Attributes for Home Care
70
EXERCISE:
Indicators to Measure HSP “Sector” Attributes
Part 2
• For your healthcare program/sector how would you
measure:
• Safe?
• Accessible?
• Effective?
• Be specific!
• Clear consistent definition, define the numerator
and/or denominator
• How would it be measured?
71
Goals for this exercise
1. What is your “program or sector” high level definition for
the attributes:
• safe,
• accessible and
• effective.
2. What one indicator can you agree should be considered by
your HSP and “sector” to measure:
• safe,
• accessible and
• effective.
72
Exercise Debrief
73
Reminders
• For those Executive Directors and Board members who
attended the Board Education Sessions, Session #3 is
happening on September 24th at 5:30 pm – 8:00 pm.
Please register (link found on LHIN website under G2G)
• HOLD THE DATE: Next Governance to Governance
Session will be: Wednesday, December 3, 2014
• Your feedback on this event is important! A survey link
will be emailed to you in the next few days
• Contact us at [email protected]
74
Closing Remarks
75
Thank you for attending
tonight’s session
76