missouri runner and triathlete

Spring 2013Volume 12, Number 1

$2.95

PRSRTSTDU.S.Postage

PAIDPermit#50

FortAtkinson,WI

www.morunandtri.com

MEDIA PARTNERwww.usatf.org

Q&A withMolly Huddle

Spring ShoeREVIEW

Aaron BraunPhoto by Tim Parker

2 MISSOURI RUNNER AND TRIATHLETE SPRING 2013 www.morunandtri.com

SPRING 2013 MISSOURI RUNNER AND TRIATHLETE 3www.morunandtri.com


Sponsored By ��One of the most unexpected running performances in 2012 featured Meb’s victory andnew PR at the Houston Trials on January 15, 2012, and his fourth place and fastest

American finish at the London Games on August 12, 2012. Meb is an elite runner who always races best under the most difficult conditions. Coached for 18 years by

Bob Larson, he finds strength in his ongoing relationships.

Meb forged a new partnership with the Skechers Performance Division as he was trainingfor the 2011 New York City Marathon. He worked with the footwear company’s designteam on the development of Skechers GOrun and leveraged his experience to fine tunethe design of Skechers GOrun 2. When I interviewed Meb in November 2011, he told methat after using Skechers GOrun he no longer had to wear orthotic inserts in his shoes —

something that amazed him.

Skechers asked Meb to answer a few of our training questions below. Check out what hehas to say and make sure you follow the Skechers Performance Division’s advice and giveSkechers GOrun 2 a try at your local running store to see how they work for you! Find a

dealer near you at: SkechersPerformance.com or roadrunnersports.com.

Meb earned a silver medal at the 2004 Athensgames and won the 2009 New York City Marathon.We caught up with him in early February, while hewas training for the 2013 Boston Marathon.

Q: Meb, you’re a top world-class marathoner,but while the vast majority of the runners inmost marathons take their running seriously,they’re not serious competitors for the podiumor anywhere near it. How should they train?

MEB: The first thing I’d say would be,“What race are you getting ready

for?” That’s what you shouldtrain for. That’s the reasonfor every workout. Now, ifyou’re running a half-marathon in a couple ofweeks, as part of yourpreparation for a fullmarathon, say, two months

from now, then your trainingfor the half is part of your

marathon training. Use it (the half) to experiment:for example going out at a hard pace and seeinghow long you can keep it up. Or see if you can runexactly even splits for the half, or even go for nega-tive splits. Learn what you can or can’t do. The pointis that every workout should have a purpose, evenif it’s just to recover from a hard workout the daybefore. Make a plan for each workout and eachrace. Then execute your plan.

Q: Any other advice?

MEB: Find somebody you can train with on a reg-ular basis – it can be an individual or a group. Hav-ing a training partner or partners makes it easier toget out the door on those days when you’d reallyrather not. And one more thing about the marathon.In the first half of the race, it’s better to be too slowthan too fast. That’s a luxury I don’t have; I have tostay with the leaders to have a chance to win therace. But you can – and should – run your ownrace. The race you’ve planned.

��

skechersperformance.comFacebook: SkechersPerformance

Twitter: @skechersGO

Engineered to promotea midfoot strike.

Traction control.Responsive feedback.

Proprietary lightweightinjection-molded midsole

Minimal heel lift keeps the foot in a nearly

neutral position.

6.6 ounces (Men’s size 9)5.2 ounces

(Women’s size 7)


TTAABBLLEE OOFF CCOONNTTEENNTTSS

6 PPuubblliisshheerr’’ss NNootteeBy Larry Eder

8 TThhee SSqquuaarree BBeeyyoonndd CCoommppaarree:: LLaaffaayyeettttee PPaarrkkBy Mike Meehan

12 AAaarroonn BBrraauunn aanndd MMaattttiiee SSuuvveerr BBrreeaakkGGOO!! SStt.. LLoouuiiss HHaallff MMaarraatthhoonn CCoouurrssee RReeccoorrddssCourtesy of GO! St. Louis

15 SSpprriinngg SShhooee RReevviieewwBy Cregg Weinmann

21 QQ&&AA wwiitthh MMoollllyy HHuuddddlleeBy Larry Eder

24 MMiinniimmaalliisstt SShhooee RReevviieewwBy Cregg Weinmann

26 SSttaarrttiinngg BBlloocckkssBy Dick Patrick of USA TrackNews

28 GGrraanndd BBlluuee MMiillee TTaappppeedd ttoo HHoosstt 22001133––22001144 UUSSAA MMeenn’’ss && WWoommeenn’’ss 11--MMiillee RRooaadd CChhaammppiioonnsshhiippssCourtesy of USATF News

ON THE COVER:Aaron Braun, 25, from Flagstaff, AZ set a new GO! St. Louis Half Marathonrecord on April 7 with a time of 1:03:13. Braun and women's half-marathonwinner, Mattie Suver, 25, from Colorado Springs, CO, each took home theevent’s $10,000 top prize. Suver established a new women’s half marathoncourse record, posting a time of 1:12:22.

www.morunandtri.com6 MISSOURI RUNNER AND TRIATHLETE SPRING 2013

Group EditorChristine Johnson

[email protected]

Founding EditorGina Sokolich

[email protected]

Managing EditorD. M. Strauss

[email protected]

Group PublisherLarry Eder, Shooting Star Media, Inc.P.O. Box 801, Fort Atkinson, WI 53538

[email protected]

Fax: 920.564.7298

AdvertisingShooting Star Media, [email protected]

608.239.3785

DesignRichele Collins

[email protected]

CopyeditorMarg Sumner

Red Ink Editorial Services [email protected]

ContributorsLarry Eder, Cregg Weinmann, Mike Meehan,Victah/PhotoRun, Dick Patrick, USATF News,

GO! St. Louis, Tim Parker

Pre-Press / Printing W. D. Hoard & Sons Company

Fort Atkinson, WI

Missouri Runner and Triathlete is produced andpublished by Shooting Star Media, Inc., P.O. Box801, Fort Atkinson, WI 53538. Publisher assumesno liability for matter printed. Publisher assumes noresponsibility or liability for content of paid adver-tising and reserves the right to reject paid advertis-ing. Opinions expressed are those of the authorsand not necessarily those of the Publisher.

Copyright ©2013 by Shooting Star Media, Inc. AllRights Reserved. No part of this publication maybe reproduced in any form without the written per-mission of the Publisher. www.morunandtri.com

Volume 12 Number 1Spring 2013

LLC

DDee SSmmeett’’ss MMaarrhheeiinneecckkee WWaass aann IInnssppiirraattiioonn ttoo AAllll

Jim Marheinecke, my sophomore cross country coach at De Smet JesuitHigh School in Creve Coeur, died on March 12. I had received a call fromhis wife, Cathy, the Sunday before he passed away. A woman of amazingstrength, she told me of Jim’s decision to enter hospice and that his time wasnear.

Jim coached a generation of runners at De Smet, from 1971 to 1981. Heworked with the cross country team every day, running most of our longruns with us. Besides coaching, Jim ran the fields and grounds for De Smet.But he always found time for a run.

My sophomore year, Jim was coaching a senior, Paul Heck, who won thestate cross country and 2-mile titles. Paul was amazing—I had never seenanyone run so fast. I remember doing a workout and finishing just wipedout. I was dejected. Jim saw me and had me do my cool-down with him.He told me that Paul was as good as he was because he worked hard and did-n’t give up. Jim reminded me not to give up and that good things take time.

Jim influenced me not only in my running, but in how I decided to workin the sport that I love. Over the years, I continued to speak with Jim. Wekept in touch over the past 2 years while he was dealing with cancer. I toldhim how much he meant to me. As you would expect, I wish I could haveeven one more opportunity to talk with him.

Coaches are hugely influential in our lives; they are our cheerleaders,teachers and confessors. Take a moment to think about the coaches in yourlife, or in your children’s lives, and consider all of the good things that theydo. Then take a minute and thank them.

Larry Eder

Larry EderPublisher, Missouri Runner and TriathletePresident, The Running Network, LLC

PPUUBBLLIISSHHEERR’’SS NNOOTTEE

©20

13 B

rook

s Sp

orts

, Inc

.


The Square Beyond Compare:

LLaaffaayyeettttee PPaarrkkBy Mike Meehan

With numerous responsibilities and commitments pulling me in differentdirections, getting mileage in during the workweek can be tricky. When it’s darkoutside, some runners opt for the treadmill or the track. Others, like me, preferthe city streets and parks.

I needed a convenient place, safe from traffic, to knock out a quick 3–5 milesafter work. After passing by Lafayette Square Park recently, I realized I’d foundwhat I needed.

Nestled in the heart of St. Louis’ Lafayette Square neighborhood, the park islocated about a mile southwest of downtown. Dedicated in 1851, LafayetteSquare Park was one of the first public parks to be established in St. Louis, and it

Photo by Mike Meehan


BLA

DE-

MA

X ST

AB

LE

Your

soc

ial l

ife w

ill b

e a

mes

s, b

irthd

ays

will

be

mis

sed

and

you

will

sto

p

bein

g in

vite

d ou

t. Its

pro

gres

sive

cus

hion

ing

adap

ts to

you

r run

, you

r spe

ed,

whi

le g

ivin

g yo

u a

grea

t rid

e. It

will

con

vinc

e yo

u to

car

e ab

out n

othi

ng

but r

unni

ng. T

his

shoe

is e

very

thin

g yo

u w

ant y

our d

aily

runn

ing

shoe

to b

e.

THIS

SH

OE

WIL

LR

UIN

YO

UR

LIF

E.

www.morunandtri.com10 MISSOURI RUNNER AND TRIATHLETE SPRING 2013

LLaaffaayyeettttee PPaarrkkPhoto by Mike Meehan


is considered to be the oldest urbanpark west of the Mississippi.

Bounded by Mississippi, Park,Missouri and Lafayette avenues, thepark’s perimeter covers just under amile. Each street boundary stretches alittle less than a quarter mile, andeach is marked with designatedwalk/bike lanes.

This square park makes the perfecturban setting for some quick miles orspeed work. The park has all theingredients runners love in a short,quick workout: fast straightaways,gradual hills and the option of mixingit up and running the paved trailsthat circle and crisscross the park’sinterior.

In the winter it’s a great place toget in a few quick miles. The rest ofthe year it’s a place to linger andsavor. When warmer weather returns,Lafayette Square Park blooms withtrees, flowers and plants. Geese andducks nest around the park’s pond.And of course, the architecture ofLafayette Square’s magnificent, his-toric homes entices you to slow downand enjoy the views around you.

With the neighborhood’s retailarea only a block away, there are plen-ty of places to unwind after a run,including Square One Brewery,SqWires, Park Avenue Coffee andBailey’s Chocolate Bar.

Do a fast workout on a track?There’s no comparison. I’ll takeLafayette Square Park. �

Photo by Mike Meehan


AAaarroonn BBrraauunn aanndd MMaattttiiee SSuuvveerr BBrreeaakk GGOO!! SStt.. LLoouuiiss HHaallff MMaarraatthhoonn CCoouurrssee RReeccoorrddss Geoffrey Kiprotich and Autumn Ray Take 1st in Marathon

Courtesy of GO! St. Louis

ST. LOUIS – April 7 – Aaron Braun, 25, from Flagstaff, seta new GO! St. Louis Half Marathon record with a time of1:03:13. Braun was closely followed by Jordan Chipangama,24, also from Flagstaff, with a 1:03:22. Josphat Boit, LittleRock, finished 3rd, posting a time of 1:03:52.

On the women’s side it was another first-time GO! St. LouisHalf Marathon champion—Mattie Suver, 25, from ColoradoSprings, who established a new women’s half marathon courserecord, posting a time of 1:12:22, which eclipsed the record setby Serena Ramsey (Burla) of 1:14:13 in 2007. Tera Moody, 32,from Boulder, finished 2nd with a time of 1:12:34. SaraKiptoo, 23, Santa Fe, finished 3rd with a time of 1:12:51.

Braun and Suver both secured the $10,000 top prize in thehalf marathon, which is the fourth-highest prize in the UnitedStates. Second-place finishers in the men’s and women’s divi-sions received $5,000, while 3rd place received $2,000.

In the marathon, Geoffrey Kiprotich, 34, from Sylvania,OH, outlasted the field, posting a 2:20:00, which set a newmarathon course record. Kiprotich broke Zac Freudenburg’s2009 record of 2:23:57. Kiprotich was followed by 2nd-place

finisher Mark Chepses, 36, of Little Rock, who posted a timeof 2:20:49. Finishing 3rd in the marathon was Mario Macias,31, from Manitou, CO, with a time of 2:21:59. Macias is aformer GO! St. Louis Half Marathon champion (2010).

In the women’s marathon, Autumn Ray, 33, from Tuscon,was the first woman to cross the line, with a time of 2:51:28.Ray finished ahead of Tia Accetta, 37, also from Tuscon(2:54:49) and 3rd-place finisher Karen Meraw, ShelbyTownship, MI (2:55:22).

Top Results Marathon – Men’s DivisionGeoffrey Kiprotich, 34, Sylvania, OH – 2:20:00, $1,500 + $1,000 course record bonus

Mark Chepses, 36, Little Rock – 2:20:49, $750Mario Macias, 31, Manitou, CO – 2:21:59, $500

Marathon – Women’s DivisionAutumn Ray, 33, Tuscon – 2:51:28, $1,500Tia Accetta, 37, Tuscon – 2:54:49, $750Karen Meraw, 27, Shelby Township, MI – 2:55:22, $500

Photo courtesy Tim Parker


Half Marathon – Men’s DivisionAaron Braun, 25, Flagstaff – 1:03:13, $10,000Jordan Chipangama, 24, Flagstaff – 1:03:22, $5,000Josphat Boit, 29, North Little Rock – 1:03:52, $2,000

Half Marathon – Women’s DivisionMattie Suver, 25, Colorado Springs – 1:12:22, $10,000Tera Moody, 32, Boulder – 1:12:34, $5,000Sara Kiptoo, 23, Santa Fe – 1:12:51, $2,000

The GO! St. Louis Family Fitness Weekend was created for allages and fitness abilities and features a marathon, presented byMercy; half marathon, presented by PNC Bank; marathon relay,presented by Lockton Companies; 5K Run/Walk, presented byMercy; GO! St. Louis Read, Right and Run Marathon®, present-ed by Express Scripts; Children’s Fun Runs; and a Mature Mile.The GO! St. Louis Marathon & Family Fitness Weekend isMissouri’s largest fitness event. �

For complete results, visit www.gostlouis.org

Photo courtesy Tim Parker


October 27, 2013

JOURNEYON

IT’S TIME TO SHOW YOUR METAL. LACE UP AND PARTY THROUGH THE PAIN, BECAUSE YOU’RE

DOING MORE THAN COUNTING DOWN THE MILES. IN FACT, THE PODIUM ISN’T THE POINT.

IT’S TIME TO JOURNEY ON!

JOIN THE ROCK REVOLUTION AND SIGN UP TODAY! RUNROCKNROLL.COM

TM

JOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEY

JOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEY

JOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEY

ONJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYONONONONONONONONJOURNEYONONONONJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYJOURNEYONJOURNEYONJOURNEYONJOURNEYONJOURNEYJOURNEYONONON

ONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONON

ING MORE DOING MORE

ITIT’S TIME T

DODO

’S TIME T’S TIME T’S TIME TITIT

OLOL

ttOct

AL.

ING MORE

IN JO

SHO

ING MORE ING MORE ING MORE

O

ING MORE ING MORE

OCK REVTHE R

OcOc

OL

MET

OcOc

OUR

IN

OcttOc

THAN COUNTING DO

Oc

OCK REVOLOCK REVOCK REVOCK REVOCK REV

THAN COUNTING DO

THE R

THAN COUNTING DO

THE R

THAN COUNTING DOTHAN COUNTING DO

IN JO

THAN COUNTING DO

JO

THAN COUNTING DO

METOUR OUR W Y METOUR

ING MORE

’S TIME T’S TIME T’S TIME T SHO AL. METOUR W YW YW YSHOO ’S TIME T

UTION AND S

ober 27ober 27ober 27ober 27ober 27ober 27

OD

TY

S. IN F

JOURNEYJOURNEYO ’S TIME T

THE MILE

UP AND UP AND

THE MILETHE MILETHE MILE

UP AND

ober 27

UTI

THAN COUNTING DO

’S TIME T’S TIME T

AND SAND SAND SIGN UP GN UP ODOD

LA

O JOURNEY

TY

ober 27ober 27ober 27ober 27ober 27,ober 27ober 27,

CE

tt

OD

JOURNEY

TT

JOURNEY

GN UP

JOURNEYJOURNEY

IAND S

’S TIME T

UTION

’S TIME T

UTI

IT’S TIME T JOURNEY

S. IN FS. IN FS. IN FS. IN FS. IN F

O

THE MILES. IN F

’S TIME T

THE MILEWN WN WN

IT

THAN COUNTING DO AS. IN F

AR

THE MILETHE MILE

THR

THE MILE

PUP AND UP AND UP AND CE AR

WN

LALA

THAN COUNTING DOTHAN COUNTING DO

AL. AL. THRTYTYARUP AND PUP AND CE LAAL.

RUNROCKNROLL.

C

RUNROCKNROLL.

SN’SN’

RUNROCKNROLL.

SN’

COMCOMRUNROCKNROLL.

IUM I

RUNROCKNROLL.RUNROCKNROLL.

122 3

A

ON!

OUGH THE

THE PODTHE PODTHE PODTHE POD

RUNROCKNROLL.RUNROCKNROLL.

ON!

3

IUM I

A RUNROCKNROLL.RUNROCKNROLL.RUNROCKNROLL.RUNROCKNROLL.RUNROCKNROLL.RUNROCKNROLL.RUNROCKNROLL.

3310 31

RUNROCKNROLL.

10

THR

02

COMRUNROCKNROLL.

THE POTSN’THE POD

Y!

ON! ON!

THE POD

Y!

ON!

AAY!

JOURNEY ON!

, CT

JOURNEY

THE PO

A

TSN’SN’

BEBE

IUM IIUM I

AIN, AIN, P

THE POD

OUGH THE OUGH THE OUGH THE

C ,

OUGH THE

TC

OUGH THE

A

THR ACBEAIN, POUGH THE THR

COM

USE Y

COM

INT. INT

OU’RE OU’RE OU’RE

THE PO . THE POINTINTTHE POTHE PO

OU’RE OU’RE OU’RE USE YUSE YUSE YUSE Y

TM

��!��"��04+0/��4#$+-+:+/)<+++�;��'2(02.#/%'<+6�;��'542#-<6+

The minimalist craze that began several years ago has worked its way through the entire runningfootwear industry. In the absence of industry standards, brands have developed competing definitions of minimal, as runners and retailers watch with fascination. This minimalist

groundswell has resulted in entirely new brands, brands new to running, and the revitalization of several companies that, by all appearances, were defunct. No major running brand remains untouchedby this new category.

Over the last several years, the Running Network has looked at Minimal shoes as a distinct category,and we reviewed them separately. However, the shoes we looked at and tested for this cross-categoryreview made it clear that the minimalist philosophy now influences all running shoe design.

Half the shoes in this review are Performance shoes, more than in any previous review. Lighter materials and the focus on geometry have redefined what constitutes a Performance shoe. Light weightused to be the primary distinction of Performance shoes. Now it’s actually the shape of the midsolethat’s more important, as real performance comes from efficient biomechanics. The shoes with the bestshape encourage better running form. Heel-to-toe drop—the difference between the height of the heelrelative to that of the toe—has also become an important design consideration because of the efficiencyof running in a lower profile shoe. One more characteristic of Performance shoes is the stack height:the amount of foam between the foot and the ground. It significantly determines comfort inPerformance (and Minimal) shoes.

This trend toward the minimal has affected even the heavier Motion Stabilizing and Neutral shoe categories. Most of these shoes have trimmed down, focusing on achieving their original functions withless bulk. Christopher McDougal’s 2009 book, Born to Run, was a catalyst of this Minimalist trend, butits vigorous growth continues because runners are enjoying less. Oh, they aren’t enjoying runningless—they’re enjoying the feel of less on their feet. It’s a new take on the old adage, Less Is More.

—Cregg Weinmann, Running Network Footwear Reviewer


Cregg Weinmann has been the Running Network’s footwear reviewer since 1998. His reviews have evolvedfrom biannual reviews—Spring and Fall—to additional two-page reviews on specific categories such asMinimalist, Road Racers, Track & Field, Trail, Best Shoes Under $85, and Kids’ Shoes.

I’m amazed how well the projects come together. The team we have—Kristen Cerer and Alex Larsen in design,Marg Sumner as proofreader, Cregg as footwear reviewer—helmed by project coordinator/editor ChristineJohnson, has found a way to share an immense amount of information in an easy-to-read format.

In the end, content is king. The Running Network’s Shoe Reviews and features provide access to our carefullyresearched information on running footwear to more than 4 million readers via print, the Web, digital andmobile formats, and social media (FB and Twitter).

Where is running footwear going? Here, Weinmann and researchers like Simon Bartold and Jack Daniels arein agreement: Lightweight will not be going away. Minimalism is a great tool—really, training equipment—toimprove your running experience and performance. At the end of the day, the Running Network’s ShoeReviews and features, along with our partners’ magazines, websites, and social media, are here for just onereason: to enhance your running experience and relationship with your local running community.

So take a run, cool down, and then enjoy reading our 2013 Spring Shoe Review, and continue your quest forthe perfect running shoe for you!

Larry EderPresident, Running Network LLC

#&+&#3��/'2)9��0034� �'7��#-#/%'�� 6�

��'-��#9#/0�� #5%0/9��+2#)'�� +:5/0�"#6'��+&'2��

American Track & Fieldwww.american-trackandfield.comAthletes Onlywww.atf-athlete.comAthletics (Canada)www.athleticsontario.caAustin Fitwww.austinfitmagazine.comCalifornia Track & Running Newswww.caltrack.comClub Runningwww.rrca.org/publications/club-runningCoaching Athletics Quarterly www.coachingathleticsq.comColorado Runnerwww.coloradorunnermag.comGet Active!www.healthclubs.comGreater Long Island Running Club’s Footnoteswww.glirc.orgLatinos Corriendowww.latinoscorriendo.comMarathon Guidewww.marathonguide.comMichigan Runnerwww.michiganrunner.netMissouri Runner & Triathletewww.morunandtri.comRunning Journal & Racing Southwww.running.netRunMinnesotawww.runmdra.orgRUNOHIOwww.runohio.comTrack & Field Newswww.trackandfieldnews.comUSATF’s Fast Forwardwww.usatf.orgUSATF–New England’s Exchange Zonewww.usatfne.orgThe Winged Footwww.nyac.orgThe Winged Mwww.themac.comYouth Runnerwww.youthrunner.com

Reviewer: Cregg Weinmann Project Coordinator/Editor: Christine Johnson Designer: Kristen Cerer Proofreader: Marg Sumner, Red Ink Editorial Services Shoe Photography: Daniel Saldaña, Cregg Weinmann Advertising Sales: Running Network LLC, Larry Eder, President, 608.239.3785, [email protected]: Larry Eder, 608.239.3785 Website: www.runningnetwork.com For a Media Kit, please visit our website.

This 2013 Spring Shoe Review is produced independently by Running Network LLC for its partner publications. All shoes reviewed were tested by experienced, competitive runners who were matchedto the biomechanical purpose of each shoe model.

Copyright © 2013 by Running Network LLC. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be stored, copied, or reprinted withoutprior written permission of Running Network LLC.

Running Network LLC and its partner publications suggest that, as with all fitness activities, you meet with a healthcare professional beforebeginning or changing your fitness regimen.

��

"'-%0.'�40�4*'��5//+/)��'4702,=3��12+/)��*0'��'6+'7

� ��"��

BEST SHOENEUTRAL

SPRING 2013

� � � � ��5//+/)��'4702,��12+/)��*0'��'6+'7<++

BEST SHOEMOTION

STABILIZINGSPRING 2013

BEST SHOEPERFORMANCE

SPRING 2013

BEST NEW SHOE

SPRING 2013

BEST RENOVATION

SPRING 2013

�5//+/)��'4702,��12+/)��*0'��'6+'7<+++

��'-��#9#/0�� <��As ASICS’ flagship shoe for plush stability, the Gel-Kayano continues to set the bar high for this category. Now sleeker andlighter weight, Round 19 is worthy of the attention it will surely attract. The upper features an almost tailored fit, as ASICS continues to dial in its well-established technologies of separated Discrete eyelets and Bio-Fit stretch inserts. The shoe supports and moves with the foot better than ever. The upper trades the previous open mesh for a closed mesh and weldedoverlays, giving the shoe a more unified feel. The midsole features the same basic profile but is more rounded, as has beenadopted by other shoes in ASICS’ line. The generous Gel pad has been reshaped and the Dynamic DuoMax—a stabilizingmedial support—effectively curbs overpronation. The outersole is AHAR in the heel with DuraSponge rubber, ASICS’ provenrubber compound, in the forefoot. With its combination of fit, stability, and stylish performance, the Gel-Kayano 19 earned ouraward for Best Shoe in the Motion Stabilizing category.

“Fit just right; stable and secure. Plenty of cushion. What’s not to like? The Kayano is predictable and effective.”

Sizes: Men 6–14,15,16 (D), 8–14,15,16 (2E,4E); Women 5–12 (B,D) • Weight: 11.3 oz. (men’s size 11); 9.4 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: combination Strobel lasted, Solyte Strobel board (heel) • Recommended for: low- to medium–high-arched feet with mild to moderate overpronation

�#5%0/9��20�2+&��522+%#/'��<��The Hurricane is Saucony’s most reliable motion stabilizing shoe and, with Round 14, was the first of its mainline models tofeature the lowered geometry of an 8-millimeter heel-to-toe drop. Here, it keeps that geometry and its efficient heel-to-toe transition. Also retained in the upper are the Sauc-fit insert and flat laces to secure the foot, a similar breathable mesh, andreflective accents. The midsole is PowerGrid, a foam formulation that’s responsive and resilient, and offers a firm ride and gooddurability. The outersole is XT-900 carbon rubber in the heel, with iBR+, a formulation of injected rubber, in the forefoot forgood durability with the cushioning of blown rubber. The result is a durable shoe that can handle the miles and the long, hard road.

“Perfect fit, and stable. Lots of bounce and great support. The Hurricane was an outstanding shoe for me.”

Sizes: Men: 7–13,14,15,16 (B,D,2E,4E); Women: 5–12 (2A,B,D,2E) • Weight: 10.4 oz. (men’s size 11); 8.3 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board • Recommended for: low- to medium–high-arched feet with mild to moderate overpronation

�200,3��&2'/#-+/'��<��Brooks’ go-to shoe has risen to the level of industryicon. The Adrenaline is evidence of Brooks’ commit-ment to consistency: Round 13 maintains what works.The upper has undergone a shift to a smaller mesh,and the details—welded forefoot overlays and a seriesof adjustable eyelets that improve the midfoot fit of theshoe—have been fine tuned, resulting in a morerefined fit. In the midsole, there have been some minoradjustments to the look of the sidewall molding, butthe crashpad and medial support remain essentiallyunchanged. The outersole still has its proven configu-ration of HPR carbon rubber in the heel and Flextra, ablown rubber compound, in the forefoot. By offering asubstantial array of features and holding the pricesteady, Brooks has made the Adrenaline an even bettervalue. And that’s good news for loyal Adrenaline fansand an invitation to potential fans.

“They hugged my foot very nicely. The cushioning wasmore responsive than plush, but they were protective.

The stability is what the Adrenaline is all about.”

Sizes: Men: 7–13,14,15; Women: 5–12,13 • Weight: 11.5oz. (men’s size 11); 9.5 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: combination Strobel lasted, S257Strobel board (forefoot) • Recommended for: low- to medi-um–high-arched feet with mild to moderate overpronation

�200,3��#6'//#��<��Overshadowed by its flashier siblings, the plushTrance and the bestselling Adrenaline, the Ravenna isoften seen as Brooks’ workhorse stability shoe.However, runners who give it a try will discover that itdelivers real performance. The upper features slightmodifications: a round mesh similar to that in the 3; asmall, reworked saddle in the midfoot to lock the footdown over the midsole; and an enhanced, hinge-likearticulation in the eyestay that flexes as the foot bends.The BioMogo midsole has Brooks’ DNA cushioninginsert in both the heel and forefoot to attenuate thefoot’s impact through the gait cycle. The outersole isthe simple and proven HPR-and-Flextra-carbon/blownrubber combination for durability, yet it softens theride. The Ravenna’s light weight is a plus, but stabilityis its strength.

“Great fit and light as a feather. I was impressed by thecomfort. The Ravenna is very balanced and secure. I

could not expect more.”

Sizes: Men: 7–13,14,15; Women: 5–12,13 • Weight: 11.1oz. (men’s size 11); 9.2 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip lasted, S257 Strobelboard • Recommended for: low- to medium–high-archedfeet with mild to moderate overpronation

�+:5/0�"#6'��/31+2'� <��Mizuno has earned its reputation for providing comfortand performance due to shoes like the Inspire. Round9 provides all that with a bit of added oomph. Theupper is a new, closed mesh that improves supportand breathability, and it’s enhanced by no-sew overlays,so the fit remains familiar though a bit more support-ive. The midsole is AP+ foam, and the asymmetricalWave plate inhibits overpronation. This configurationalways has been a good combination, but testersseemed even more aware of its performance in thisround. The outersole of X-10 rubber provides tractionand durability, and the hinge-like Smooth-Ride soledesign provides a smooth transition through groundcontact. The result is a stable, responsive shoe thatdelivers high-mileage performance.

“Good fit right from the box; very stable and secure feel-ing. Good cushioning and stability. The Inspire has been

consistently well done.”

Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15,16 (D,2E); Women: 6–12 (2A,D) •Weight: 10.4 oz. (men’s size 11); 8.3 oz. (women’s size 8) •Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted •Recommended for: low- to medium–high-arched feet withmild to moderate overpronation

.04+0/�34#$+-+:+/)

SPRING 2013 MISSOURI RUNNER AND TRIATHLETE 17www.morunandtri.com �5//+/)��'4702,��12+/)��*0'��'6+'7<+++

��'-��#9#/0�� <��As ASICS’ flagship shoe for plush stability, the Gel-Kayano continues to set the bar high for this category. Now sleeker andlighter weight, Round 19 is worthy of the attention it will surely attract. The upper features an almost tailored fit, as ASICS continues to dial in its well-established technologies of separated Discrete eyelets and Bio-Fit stretch inserts. The shoe supports and moves with the foot better than ever. The upper trades the previous open mesh for a closed mesh and weldedoverlays, giving the shoe a more unified feel. The midsole features the same basic profile but is more rounded, as has beenadopted by other shoes in ASICS’ line. The generous Gel pad has been reshaped and the Dynamic DuoMax—a stabilizingmedial support—effectively curbs overpronation. The outersole is AHAR in the heel with DuraSponge rubber, ASICS’ provenrubber compound, in the forefoot. With its combination of fit, stability, and stylish performance, the Gel-Kayano 19 earned ouraward for Best Shoe in the Motion Stabilizing category.

“Fit just right; stable and secure. Plenty of cushion. What’s not to like? The Kayano is predictable and effective.”

Sizes: Men 6–14,15,16 (D), 8–14,15,16 (2E,4E); Women 5–12 (B,D) • Weight: 11.3 oz. (men’s size 11); 9.4 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: combination Strobel lasted, Solyte Strobel board (heel) • Recommended for: low- to medium–high-arched feet with mild to moderate overpronation

�#5%0/9��20�2+&��522+%#/'��<��The Hurricane is Saucony’s most reliable motion stabilizing shoe and, with Round 14, was the first of its mainline models tofeature the lowered geometry of an 8-millimeter heel-to-toe drop. Here, it keeps that geometry and its efficient heel-to-toe transition. Also retained in the upper are the Sauc-fit insert and flat laces to secure the foot, a similar breathable mesh, andreflective accents. The midsole is PowerGrid, a foam formulation that’s responsive and resilient, and offers a firm ride and gooddurability. The outersole is XT-900 carbon rubber in the heel, with iBR+, a formulation of injected rubber, in the forefoot forgood durability with the cushioning of blown rubber. The result is a durable shoe that can handle the miles and the long, hard road.

“Perfect fit, and stable. Lots of bounce and great support. The Hurricane was an outstanding shoe for me.”

Sizes: Men: 7–13,14,15,16 (B,D,2E,4E); Women: 5–12 (2A,B,D,2E) • Weight: 10.4 oz. (men’s size 11); 8.3 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board • Recommended for: low- to medium–high-arched feet with mild to moderate overpronation

�200,3��&2'/#-+/'��<��Brooks’ go-to shoe has risen to the level of industryicon. The Adrenaline is evidence of Brooks’ commit-ment to consistency: Round 13 maintains what works.The upper has undergone a shift to a smaller mesh,and the details—welded forefoot overlays and a seriesof adjustable eyelets that improve the midfoot fit of theshoe—have been fine tuned, resulting in a morerefined fit. In the midsole, there have been some minoradjustments to the look of the sidewall molding, butthe crashpad and medial support remain essentiallyunchanged. The outersole still has its proven configu-ration of HPR carbon rubber in the heel and Flextra, ablown rubber compound, in the forefoot. By offering asubstantial array of features and holding the pricesteady, Brooks has made the Adrenaline an even bettervalue. And that’s good news for loyal Adrenaline fansand an invitation to potential fans.

“They hugged my foot very nicely. The cushioning wasmore responsive than plush, but they were protective.

The stability is what the Adrenaline is all about.”

Sizes: Men: 7–13,14,15; Women: 5–12,13 • Weight: 11.5oz. (men’s size 11); 9.5 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: combination Strobel lasted, S257Strobel board (forefoot) • Recommended for: low- to medi-um–high-arched feet with mild to moderate overpronation

�200,3��#6'//#��<��Overshadowed by its flashier siblings, the plushTrance and the bestselling Adrenaline, the Ravenna isoften seen as Brooks’ workhorse stability shoe.However, runners who give it a try will discover that itdelivers real performance. The upper features slightmodifications: a round mesh similar to that in the 3; asmall, reworked saddle in the midfoot to lock the footdown over the midsole; and an enhanced, hinge-likearticulation in the eyestay that flexes as the foot bends.The BioMogo midsole has Brooks’ DNA cushioninginsert in both the heel and forefoot to attenuate thefoot’s impact through the gait cycle. The outersole isthe simple and proven HPR-and-Flextra-carbon/blownrubber combination for durability, yet it softens theride. The Ravenna’s light weight is a plus, but stabilityis its strength.

“Great fit and light as a feather. I was impressed by thecomfort. The Ravenna is very balanced and secure. I

could not expect more.”

Sizes: Men: 7–13,14,15; Women: 5–12,13 • Weight: 11.1oz. (men’s size 11); 9.2 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip lasted, S257 Strobelboard • Recommended for: low- to medium–high-archedfeet with mild to moderate overpronation

�+:5/0�"#6'��/31+2'� <��Mizuno has earned its reputation for providing comfortand performance due to shoes like the Inspire. Round9 provides all that with a bit of added oomph. Theupper is a new, closed mesh that improves supportand breathability, and it’s enhanced by no-sew overlays,so the fit remains familiar though a bit more support-ive. The midsole is AP+ foam, and the asymmetricalWave plate inhibits overpronation. This configurationalways has been a good combination, but testersseemed even more aware of its performance in thisround. The outersole of X-10 rubber provides tractionand durability, and the hinge-like Smooth-Ride soledesign provides a smooth transition through groundcontact. The result is a stable, responsive shoe thatdelivers high-mileage performance.

“Good fit right from the box; very stable and secure feel-ing. Good cushioning and stability. The Inspire has been

consistently well done.”

Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15,16 (D,2E); Women: 6–12 (2A,D) •Weight: 10.4 oz. (men’s size 11); 8.3 oz. (women’s size 8) •Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted •Recommended for: low- to medium–high-arched feet withmild to moderate overpronation

.04+0/�34#$+-+:+/)

BEST SHOEMOTION

STABILIZINGSPRING 2013

18 MISSOURI RUNNER AND TRIATHLETE SPRING 2013 www.morunandtri.com�5//+/)��'4702,��12+/)��*0'��'6+'7<+6 � � � � �

1'2(02.#/%'

��'-��8%'-��<��The Gel-Excel, ASICS’ flagship shoe of the 33 series, has undergone its first update, and Round 2 introduces a new approachto the geometry of the series, Fluid Axis, which debuts in two shoes this season. The upper has been dialed in to provide justenough structure to line up the foot over the midsole, particularly in the heel, while the no-sew overlays provide security. Themidsole is composed of Solyte foam topped by SpEVA, and features Fluid Axis geometry, which allows flexibility in two planesunder the heel. Here, it’s firmer than the version in the Gel-Lyte 33 2, so it offers a different and more supportive ride. The outersole is spare, though there’s more of it here than on the Gel-Lyte. It’s enough to contribute a touch of structure and a bitof cushion where the rubber is bonded to the midsole. The net effect is a lightweight, mid-mileage shoe for faster running ordaily training for efficient runners who are speedy and lightweight themselves.

“They fit very nicely and are comfortable from beginning to the end of the run. They have lots of cushioning, though the heel is noticeablyless bouncy than the forefoot.”

Updates the ASICS Gel-Excel 33 • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15; Women 6–13 • Weight: 10.3 oz. (men’s size 11); 8.6 oz. (women’s size 8) •Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, Solyte Strobel board • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutralbiomechanics

�+:5/0�"#6'��-+8'2��<��The Elixer continues to be a flashy bauble in Mizuno’s line, but it’s a bauble with plenty of muscle. The upper is a closed mesh,but with attention-grabbing, sublimated graphics. Like other Mizuno shoes this year, the midfoot is supported by no-sew overlays and anchored by heel and toe overlays of traditional synthetics. The low-profile midsole has a single asymmetricalWave plate setup, but the real surprise is the responsiveness and resilience of the AP+ foam. The outersole continues with X-10 rubber in the heel and a forefoot combination of blown rubber laterally and fabric-backed TPU medially, improving the durability of the shoe. The result is a snappy, lightweight shoe for faster and more stable running.

“Very good fit, secure and supportive. The ride is firm but well cushioned, and the stability is surprising for a shoe this light. Very versatile—you could even race in them.”

Updates the Wave Elixer 7 • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15; Women 6–11 • Weight: 9.8 oz. (men’s size 11); 8.2 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics to mild overpronation

��'-��94'��<� �The roots of this shoe reach way back, and Gel-Lyte isa welcome addition to ASICS’ 33 series. Round 1 hadsignificant strengths, but its upper had a few issues.Round 2 addresses those and also debuts Fluid Axis,ASICS’ new midsole geometry designed to work efficiently with the foot’s motion. The upper has beencompletely redesigned, with a minimesh and syntheticoverlays but no additional structure. The midsole isSolyte foam with flex grooves beneath the heel’s mainjoint (one of 33 joints in each foot) to allow its move-ment without excessive hindrance. Some weartestersfound this movement uncomfortable, though it mayjust take getting used to. The outersole is a minimalcarbon rubber/blown rubber setup only in the highest-wear areas to allow the foot to take advantage of theFluid Axis system. The result is a shoe for faster run-ning that will make your feet stronger, though you mayneed some time to adapt to it, and it may not be a shoeyou can wear every day.

“Felt like my feet were in moccasins. ... The shoe feelsgood to run in. I always felt like my feet were landing

properly, but they were a little tiring to get used to. Not superdurable, but they are useful for my faster runs.”

Updates the Gel-Lyte 33 • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15; Women6–13 • Weight: 9.2 oz. (men’s size 11); 7.7 oz. (women’ssize 8) • Shape: semi-curved to curved • Construction:Strobel slip-lasted • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics

�200,3��52'�-07��<��Round 2 of the PureFlow sports a few key changesalong with a bump in the price, which is a sign of thetimes. The upper has been completely reworked. Thetongue is gone, in favor of a continuous lateral-sideopening with a medial flap. Support over the instep isprovided by the Navband and no-sew overlays on eachside that create a midfoot saddle. Paint the whole thingin dayglow colors and reflective accents, and you havebuilt-in, eye-catching safety features. The low-profilemidsole continues with a 4mm drop that can handlesome serious mileage. The outersole is carbon rubber,used sparingly on numerous pods (especially the podunder the fifth metatarsal), allowing the foot to supportand balance itself in midstance. Succinctly put, thePureFlow 2 is low-slung, light, and responsive.

“Comfortable while running, neither too snug nor [too]loose. The toebox does not feel confining, plenty roomy.

A lot of days, this is my Go-To shoe for all types of training. Ilike the way the shoe feels while running.”

Updates the PureFlow • Sizes: Men 7–13,14; Women 5–12 •Weight: 9.8 oz. (men’s size 11); 7.9 oz. (women’s size 8) •Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted •Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutralbiomechanics

�#2*5��-07��+)*4��5-%25.<��The Flow Light Fulcrum represents the latest iterationof Karhu’s Fulcrum technology, and we think it’s themost effective one to date. The midsole combines theFulcrum element—here, a second-density foam—with a softer density of EVA to deliver an effective ridethat’s responsive and resilient. The geometry is a lowheel-to-toe drop with a shallow stack height that light-ens the shoe while still providing good comfort andcushion. Spare rubber on the outersole lends a littletraction and durability without adding much weight.The upper is airmesh with welded overlays that wrapthe foot in a minimal design that isn’t skimpy. One par-ticularly nice touch are twin lobes of memory foam inthe ankle collar that enhances the fit and adds thetouch of comfort needed to complete the shoe whilekeeping the weight down. The result is an excellentperformance shoe for faster running or racing.

“Great fit, light, and just barely enough cushion, but they arelight. Good ‘go fast’ shoe for faster training and racing.”

New • Sizes: Men 8–13,14; Women 5–12 • Weight: 8.9 oz.(men’s size 11); 7.5 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, perforated EVAStrobel board • Recommended for: medium- to high-archedfeet with neutral biomechanics, for faster running

SPRING 2013 MISSOURI RUNNER AND TRIATHLETE 19www.morunandtri.com �5//+/)��'4702,��12+/)��*0'��'6+'7<6

�,'%*'23��0�5/��<��The update to the GoRun brings Skechers a bit closer to the mainstream, while retaining its unique story. The entire shoe has beenrevised, and we think the revision is successful. The upper retains its stretch mesh, keeping the slipper-like feel and low-slung,racer fit. No-sew, welded overlays support the saddle as before. The midsole geometry has been altered with slightly lowered lugsunder the arch, reducing the awkward midfoot feel of the last round. The ride is resilient and cushions the foot well, but it’s veryflexible and may require some adaptation prior to regular wear. The outersole is almost nonexistent: about a dozen carbon rubberdots spread over a road-grade EVA sole. As a racer or a shoe reserved for faster-paced running and speedwork, it’s very good.Super-light and efficient runners might get away with daily wear, but all runners can benefit from a shoe like this for some of theirfaster runs.

“Snug, racerlike fit. I get a ‘hit the gas’ feeling when I put this on, so I use them for my fastest runs.”

Updates the GoRun • Sizes: Men 6.5–13,14; Women 5–10,11 • Weight: 7.5 oz. (men’s size 11); 6.5 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curvedto curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics, for faster-paced running

�'740/��2#6+49<��The Gravity is the original Newton shoe, now thoroughly dialed in and rolling along. Designed for neutral runners interested inperformance, its technology encourages forefoot striking via its cushioning lugs, but it benefits all neutral runners by storingand releasing energy for toe-off. Though the upper utilizes traditional airmesh and synthetic suede overlays, they are of reallyhigh quality. (And at this price, they better be!) The midsole is also top-grade EVA, but a secret resides here: A membrane ofHytrel plastic absorbs energy at impact and then releases it at toe-off as the foot rolls forward, contributing an extra little “push.”The outersole is a typical setup of carbon rubber in the heel and lower-density rubber up front to keep the weight down. Overall,the Gravity is all about efficient running, and they’ll go as fast as you can.

“Comfortable fit and quite light. The lugs feel funny, but get better as you run on them. Surprisingly, heel strikers can actually use thesequite well. Good shoe, but $175 seems a bit expensive.”

Updates the Gravity • Sizes: Men 6–13,14,15; Women 5–12 • Weight: 10.3 oz. (men’s size 11); 8.8 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curved to curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutralbiomechanics

�+,'��-9,/+4��5/#2��<��The Flyknit Lunar1+ is a new shoe for Nike. Well, it isnew, though maybe a bit of a hybrid. With all of thefanfare over the Flyknit Racer and Trainer, the Lunar1’supper will probably look familiar. It’s knit and shapedin a single process without wasted material. With onlya seam at the ankle collar and the Strobel board,there’s little to irritate; not surprisingly, it fit our testerswell. The lacing doesn’t come up as high as usual nordoes it permit you to select which eyelets to use, but itsecurely wraps the foot. The midsole is Lunarlon foamsimilar to other Lunar shoe configurations; it’s donewell here. It’s responsive and nicely cushioned, but theramp angle—though it’s a couple millimeters lowerthan typical Nike shoes—feels a bit steep when compared to many of the shoes in this review. On theupside, it’s also better cushioned than many of them.Ultimately, it’s a matter of whether it suits you. The outersole is minimal but sufficient, keeping the weightdown and the foot protected.

“I was impressed with the ride more than the fit (niceand cushy), and the performance more than the durabil-

ity (really light and fast). They seem to be worth the price, butI might not buy a second pair.”

New • Sizes: Men 5–13,14,15; Women 5–12 • Weight: 9.6oz. (men’s size 11); 7.8 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobelboard • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feetwith neutral biomechanics

�5.#��0$+5.��-+4'<��The Mobium is a new shoe for Puma, and it takes itsname from the Möbius Strip. (Remember that twistedstrip of paper from your geometry class that lookedlike the infinity symbol?) Mobium describes the tech-nology used here: an elastic cord shaped like a figure-8 and positioned flat in the bottom of the shoe. As thefoot flexes, the cord returns the sole to its originalposition before the next step, better supporting the footby ensuring the foam is in the right spot at the foot-strike. The closed mesh upper has well-positionedfoam in the ankle collar, and offers a snug, though notconstricting, fit. The midsole is durable injection-molded EVA with rounded edges mimicking therounded shape of the heel, with a 4mm heel-to-toedrop that’s firm but responsive. The segmented outersole covers little more than the contacting surfaces to save weight. This is a shoe for faster running that gives the foot a workout as much as itprovides support in a macro sense.

“While running, the shoe works to accentuate the naturalmotion of my feet. The middle of the shoe snugs up very

tightly around my foot. Responsive cushioning, and a nicelight shoe.”

New • Sizes: Men 6.5–12,13,14; Women 5.5–11,12 •Weight: 10.0 oz. (men’s size 11); 8.3 oz. (women’s size 8) •Shape: curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVAStrobel board • Recommended for: medium- to high-archedfeet with neutral biomechanics, for faster-paced running

�#5%0/9��+2#)'��<��The Mirage has been a top performer for Saucony,straddling the categories of minimal drop shoes andsupportive shoes with a generous stack height; it’s wellcushioned and efficient. The upper returns to an openmesh with welded, no-sew overlays providing justenough support for the foot with hardly a weight gain.The midsole is responsive and well cushioned enoughto handle high-mileage training—the one constant inall three rounds. The TPU medial support in this iteration is the least obtrusive version yet and is effective at curbing overpronation (thanks, in part, tothe low heel-to-toe drop). The outersole is still justenough pieces to cover the high-wear areas of thesole; it’s pared back a bit, even from previous rounds.The combination of responsive cushioning, lightweight, and great fit earned the Mirage 3 our BestPerformance Shoe Award.

“Usual great Saucony fit: snug in the heel and midfootwith a roomy toebox. Nicely cushioned, very comfort-

able. It’s like a sleek racing shoe upper on a training shoebottom.”

Updates Mirage 2 • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15; Women 5–12 •Weight: 9.8 oz. (men’s size 11); 8.4 oz. (women’s size 8) •Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVAStrobel board • Recommended for: medium- to high-archedfeet with neutral biomechanics

1'2(02.#/%'

BEST SHOEPERFORMANCE

SPRING 2013

20 MISSOURI RUNNER AND TRIATHLETE SPRING 2013 www.morunandtri.com�5//+/)��'4702,��12+/)��*0'��'6+'7<6+

#&+&#3��/'2)9��0034<��The Energy Boost has succeeded in firing up the imagination of runners, even though so far it’s those runners who happen toown running specialty stores. The reason? The Energy Boost is light and really fun to run in. The upper is a sleek, black, stretchywoven textile, with minimal, no-sew overlays that moves effectively with the foot. The innovative midsole employs a new foamformulation (created in collaboration with chemical company BASF) that seems to last forever and provides surprising bounceto the shoe (hence, the “Boost” in its name). Though the geometry is traditional, the shoe has a fast feel, even if it’s not exactlyoutright performance oriented. The outersole is minimal with the extra material carved away, though not at the expense of durability. The combination of innovation, ride, and “cool” factor earned the Energy Boost our award for Best New Shoe.

“The fit was a little tight in the toes, but secure overall. The cushioning is almost trampoline-like, but not out of control. The shaping of themidsole makes it track pretty well.”

New • Sizes: Men 7–15; Women 5–12 • Weight: 10.2 oz. (men’s size 11); 8.8 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics

�#5%0/9��20�2+&��2+5.1*� <��This time out, the Triumph joins Saucony’s 8mm parade, featuring the same performance geometry as many of its mainlineshoes and rounding out the Saucony performance lineup. The upper is wide-open air mesh with midfoot overlays sandwichedbetween the mesh layers, and pared back to minimize weight. The overlays at the heel and toe feature a traditional constructionand are positioned to anchor the upper to the midsole. The midsole is a paradox—a generous stack height (read: well cushioned) with a low profile feel, thanks to its 8mm heel-to-toe drop. The outersole is the proven carbon rubber heel/blownrubber forefoot. Overall, the plush, midweight Triumph 9 is a high-mileage trainer with a smooth feel for the road.

“Very comfortable fit. Wrapped my foot nicely and flexed well. Surprising low-profile feel, but pretty plush cushioning. They took what Idished out, and handled my higher mileage runs great.”

Updates the ProGrid Triumph 8 • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15 (D,2E); Women 5–12 • Weight: 11.8 oz. (men’s size 11); 9.2 oz. (women’s size 8) •Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutralbiomechanics

#&+&#3��51'2/06#��-+&'�<��The Supernova Glide has been a comfortable cruiserdating back to the earliest Supernova neutral offerings.Though not as light as many other neutral shoes, itprovides a plush feel to its ride, something that’s missing in some lighter shoes. The upper is a small-weave mesh that’s a touch more supportive while stillbreathable. Effective overlays secure the midfoot whileopening up in the forefoot for a more comfortable andaccommodating fit. The toe bumper offers good protection and adds durability. The midsole continueswith adiPrene handling extra cushioning, though withdifferent formulations in the heel and forefoot. TheForMotion cassette stabilizes the foot while also serving as an effective crashpad. The outersole continueswith Continental® rubber for durability and traction.Runners should expect continued performance fromthis proven high-mileage shoe.

“Snug heel and arch, roomy toes. Responsive and stable cushioning. Durable high-mileage shoes—what

I’ve expected from the Supernova Glide.”

Updates the Supernova Glide 4 • Sizes: Men6.5–15,16,17,18,19,20; Women 4.5–14 • Weight: 12.2 oz.(men’s size 11); 9.6 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobelboard • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feetwith neutral biomechanics to very mild overpronation

�+:5/0�"#6'��+&'2��<��It’s hard to remember when Mizuno’s lineup didn’tinclude the Wave Rider. That longevity is due toMizuno’s laser-like focus on providing both a great fitand a great ride. In this round, the upper looks newwith a closed mesh that seems stiffer, enabling the traditional midfoot overlays to be replaced with fewer(and lighter) welded ones. Overlays at the heel and toecontinue to provide the same structure as before. Theshape of the midsole has been subtly altered, thoughour weartesters confirm that it provides the same performance as did the 15. The outersole is X-10 rubber with the SmoothRide hinged element in theforefoot, encouraging a snappy toe-off. Fans won’t bedisappointed, and new users will likely join the ranks.The triple threat of responsive ride, great fit, and high-mileage durability earned the Wave Rider 16 our awardfor Best Shoe in the Neutral category.

“Fit well; comfortable; no loose or tight spots. Nicecushioning, not overly squishy, with a responsive feel.

They are comfortable, durable, light, and cute. Highly recom-mend!”

Updates the Wave Rider 15 • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15,16(D,2E); Women 6–12 (2A,B,D) • Weight: 11.7 oz. (men’ssize 11); 9.1 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curved •Construction: Strobel slip-lasted • Recommended for:medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics

�'7��#-#/%'�� 6�<��By focusing on aesthetics, performance, and durability,the 890 has contributed a lot to New Balance’s runningshoe success. This is due in large part to NB’s use ofthe surprisingly light and well-cushioned midsolefoam, RevLite, which started and continues the fran-chise. Not messing with success, Round 3 arrives withno dramatic changes, which will be good news to itsmany fans. In the upper, changes are not simply cos-metic. The repositioning of the no-sew overlays wrapthe foot more securely, especially in combination withthe ankle collar foam. The midsole continues withsingle-density RevLite and well-sculpted geometry, par-ticularly in the crashpad. The outersole retains thin,but tough carbon rubber in the heel and a blown rubber forefoot. The net effect is a light, durable, high-mileage trainer with a comfortable fit, as expected. Thecontinued fusion of lightness, comfort, and supportivefit earned the 890 v3 our award for Best Renovation.

“Felt great out of the box and continue to impress.[They] feel light and fast. It is a key shoe in my rotation

because it fits well, feels great, and is reliably versatile.”

Updates the 890 v2 • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15 (D,2E);Women 5–11,12 (2A,B,D) • Weight: 10.4 oz. (men’s size11); 8.1 oz. (women’s size 8) • Shape: semi-curved •Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, PU Strobel board •Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutralbiomechanics

/'542#-

BEST SHOENEUTRAL

SPRING 2013

BEST NEW SHOE

SPRING 2013

BEST RENOVATION

SPRING 2013


Q&A with Molly HuddleAmerican Record Holder, 5000 MetersBy Larry Eder

I believe it was August of 2010 when I first met MollyHuddle. I have seen her at many events over the years, butwas formally introduced by Mark Bossardet, VP of sportsmarketing at Saucony, following her race at the 2010 AVIVALondon meet. She was a little frustrated, knowing that shecould run fast, but things just had not worked out. Shedecided to spend another two weeks in Europe to get in afast 5000 meters.

I took note at the time that Molly Huddle would be agood interview subject, but left it at that. Less than 2 weekslater—on Aug. 27, 2010—Molly, finishing 9th in a very fast5000 meters, broke the American record with her time of14:44.76. Victah Sailer of PhotoRun, our key photographer,had taken pictures of her midrace. While standing in line fora hotel bus, Victah was the person who told Molly that shehad, in fact, broken the AR.

For 3 years now Molly’s record has stood, althoughShalane Flanagan has come very close to breaking it. As I’vesaid before, an American record or world record is the per-fect storm. All elements must be great: the athlete, athlete’smind, athlete’s form, athlete’s fitness, plus good competitionand a supportive crowd. All were there for Molly Huddle onAug. 27, 2010.

I’ve spent time with Molly since then, specifically inDaegu, Korea, on her birthday, where I joined her and somefriends for a Korean barbeque dinner. With the end of theseason that year, she displayed a wry sense of humor.

I have a photograph that captures Molly midrace in herAR race. Remember those races where you ran a personalbest? There’s always the point, midrace for some, where youeither commit or slowly admit defeat. On this wonderfulevening in Brussels, nearly 3 years ago, Molly Huddle com-mitted and ran the AR of 14:44:76, gutting it out in a veryfast race.

A few weeks ago, I sent these questions, 17 in all, to agroup of athletes, hoping to share their answers with readersof RunBlogRun. Molly Huddle was the first to reply. Hereare her answers.

RunBlogRun: How did you get started in the sport?Molly Huddle: I started in junior high track. Also my dad ranmarathons while I was young, and I always thought he wascool!

RBR: What was your high school experience in sports like?MH: I did a variety of sports including basketball, soccer,track and one season of cross country. I wasn’t meant to be aballer and basically just didn’t get tired easily, so runningwon out in the end.

Huddle broke the American record in the women's5000 meters at the Belgacom Memorial vanDamme, the final meeting of the 2010 SamsungDiamond League in Brussels, Belgium.

Photo by PhotoRun.net


Introducing the Wave EVO Cursoris.

Experience a transfer of energy with every step for a smoother, more eff ortless ride. Start transforming your daily run into a mezamashii run with EVO.

Join us at mizunorunning.com.™

RBR: What were your best marks in high school?MH: I ran 4:46 for the mile and 10:01 for the 2-mile in highschool. [Ed. Note: Molly’s 10:01.08 for 2 miles, set on June14, 2002, is still a high school AR.]

RBR: If you could do anything over during your college experi-ence, what would that be?MH: I would have been a bit smarter about recovering betweenworkouts with easy runs and sleeping more and trying to rec-ognize injuries before they got worse.

RBR: What were the differences between high school and col-lege track for you?MH: I gradually ran more mileage and slightly longer workoutsin college, plus some weight lifting. Although I raced less, theraces were deeper and faster than high school.

RBR: What were your biggest experiences in college track?MH: One of my favorite memories was finishing 3rd as a teamat NCAA cross country. Also getting to run the Olympic Trialsas a sophomore was really cool!

RBR: How did you go pro?MH: I signed with my agent Ray Flynn and was fortunate thatSaucony sponsored me right out of college.

RBR: What are the biggest differences between pro and eliteamateur?

MH: I would say the expectations are bigger for someone get-ting paid to run. Although both may train hard, the pro viewsrunning as a career as well as a passion. So there is pressure toperform, and maybe the pro trains and prepares with a littlemore seriousness and specificity and does more long-termplanning because of it.

RBR: What are your goals for 2013?MH: To make the world championship team, make the final,finish higher than 10th and run a fast time at some point.

RBR: If you had a high school track team in front of you, whatmain point would you want to get across about our sport?MH: I’d say that it usually takes a long time to realize yourpotential in this sport, but even if you don’t run as fast as youwanted to, there are a lot of experiences to be had, confidenceto be gained and doors opened by running at the college levelalone, so it’s worth striving for.

RBR: What [shoes] do you train in, and what do you race in?MH: I train in Kinvara, race in Endorphin LD.

RBR: What does a typical day of build-up training look like?MH: Coffee, watch Live with Kelly and Michael, run or tempoor track workout in a.m., nap or massage or Physio in thep.m., then an easy shorter run before dinner and maybe liftingor rehab exercises.

RBR: What does a typical day of training look like during sea-son?MH: Similar, just no weight lifting, and workouts are at nightinstead of morning.

RBR: Your favorite track athlete, past or present?MH: Always amazed by Deena, Shalane, and Kara as they’vewon medals!

RBR: If you were not doing your event, what other event intrack & field would you do?MH: I would love to be able to sprint, especially the 400. SanyaRichards makes it look cool!

RBR: What is your favorite event to compete at?MH: The 5000 meters—it’s what I’m used to.

RBR: Do you have an inspirational quote?

Since Molly didn’t reply to this question, we’ve suppliedone for her. It’s from 1960 Olympic great Herb Elliott: “It isthe inspiration of the Olympic Games that drives people notonly to compete, but to improve, and to bring lasting spiritualand moral benefits to the athlete and inspiration to thoselucky enough to witness the athletic dedication.”

Special thanks to Sharon Barbano, VP, public relations,Saucony, and most of all to Molly Huddle, who answered the questions as I gave them to her, with honesty and thoughtfulness. �

Introducing the Wave EVO Cursoris.

Experience a transfer of energy with every step for a smoother, more eff ortless ride. Start transforming your daily run into a mezamashii run with EVO.

Join us at mizunorunning.com.™

THE ONLY MID-FOOT SHOE WITH WAVE TECHNOLOGY.


� ��

Minimalist Shoes Winter 2013In this review, our third annual look at minimalist shoes, we examine this growing category andfeature 7 new shoes and one updated model for you to consider. In deciding what a minimalist shoeis, we use the following ranges: a minimal heel-to-forefoot drop (5 millimeters or less); minimalsupport (can fold down the heel of the upper or pinch the sides of the heel together) and little solestructure (should be able to twist torsionally with little resistance); and light in weight (under 10 ouncesfor a men’s size 11). Shoes that satisfy at least two of these three characteristics we classify asminimal. Your use of minimalist shoes will be determined by your fitness and preferences, but allrunners can benefit from the use of a minimal shoe for at least some of their running.

��'��)&��%( ��The adiPure Adapt is the most minimal of the adidas adiPure line. The shoe’s elastic materials conform to thefoot and flex as it moves. The upper is a stretchy, booty-like construction—almost like a sock—completely coveredwith rubbery overlays that provide a hint of structure without getting in the way. Though the midsole is the lowestin the adidas running line with a stack height of 15mm and a drop of 4mm, it is a bit more than one might expectfrom the very minimal nature of the shoe. Deep flex grooves and a forefoot-only outersole provide a flexible,responsive ride and a measure of protection without sacrificing the feedback desired in a minimalist shoe.

“These ‘shoes’ have to be about as minimal as it gets. They hug my feet perfectly, and provide decent cushioning and protection, though I probably wouldn’t recommend them for everyday running.”

Heel/Forefoot Drop 4mm Sizes Men 7–13,14,15; Women 5–12 Weight 5.3 oz. (men’s 11); 4.1 oz. (women’s 8)

�&$$ '��)&��&��( ��The Pure Drift is a new shoe in Brooks’ Pure Project line. The Drift splits the difference between the originalPure’s 4mm geometry and zero-drop by featuring an insole with a 4mm drop atop a fabric-covered Strobel board,so zero-drop can be had by simply removing the insole. The upper is open mesh with a few midfoot overlays andthe familiar Navband to secure the midfoot while flexing with it. The midsole features flex grooves in a traditionalplacement (but deeper) and two “Toe Flex” grooves that allow the metatarsals freedom both laterally and longitudinally. The outersole is a zigzag ribbon of rubber from the big toe, under the metatarsals, and down thelateral side to the heel, which provides a little more durability. The Pure Drift earned honors as our Best MinimalistShoe for Winter 2013.

“Plenty of room for my toes to spread. Light as a racer with great flexibility, but still enough support to feel that it’s a shoe.”

Heel/Forefoot Drop 0mm Sizes Men 7–13,14; Women 5–12 Weight 7.2 oz. (men’s 11); 6.1 oz. (women’s 8)

��

�!(&��$&�# ��The Torin is a new shoe to the Altra line, a young brand that has taken solid root in the minimalist market. Thebrand’s aesthetics take a step forward with this model, now packaging its roomy toe-box and foot-friendly shapein a sleeker design. The upper is open mesh with welded overlays and saddle-like, ghilley lacing across the midfootto securely wrap the foot for performance. The midsole has a generous 28mm stack height (15mm in the midsole),combined with the familiar Altra zero-drop geometry to provide the benefits of a minimal shoe with enoughcushion to keep from being beaten up. The segmented carbon outersole allows good flexibility and traction withoutweighing things down. The result is a daily trainer with zero-drop geometry.

“Really roomy in the toes; not too big or wide, just spacious. The ride is plush, but the foot is close to the ground, especiallythe heel.”

Heel/Forefoot Drop 0mm Sizes Men 8–13,14,15; Women 5.5,6.5–11,12 Weight 9.6 oz. (men’s 11); 8.4 oz.(women’s 8)

��MINIMALIST

WINTER 2013


� ��

Minimalist Shoes Winter 2013In this review, our third annual look at minimalist shoes, we examine this growing category andfeature 7 new shoes and one updated model for you to consider. In deciding what a minimalist shoeis, we use the following ranges: a minimal heel-to-forefoot drop (5 millimeters or less); minimalsupport (can fold down the heel of the upper or pinch the sides of the heel together) and little solestructure (should be able to twist torsionally with little resistance); and light in weight (under 10 ouncesfor a men’s size 11). Shoes that satisfy at least two of these three characteristics we classify asminimal. Your use of minimalist shoes will be determined by your fitness and preferences, but allrunners can benefit from the use of a minimal shoe for at least some of their running.

��'��)&��%( ��The adiPure Adapt is the most minimal of the adidas adiPure line. The shoe’s elastic materials conform to thefoot and flex as it moves. The upper is a stretchy, booty-like construction—almost like a sock—completely coveredwith rubbery overlays that provide a hint of structure without getting in the way. Though the midsole is the lowestin the adidas running line with a stack height of 15mm and a drop of 4mm, it is a bit more than one might expectfrom the very minimal nature of the shoe. Deep flex grooves and a forefoot-only outersole provide a flexible,responsive ride and a measure of protection without sacrificing the feedback desired in a minimalist shoe.

“These ‘shoes’ have to be about as minimal as it gets. They hug my feet perfectly, and provide decent cushioning and protection, though I probably wouldn’t recommend them for everyday running.”


�&$$ '��)&��&��( ��The Pure Drift is a new shoe in Brooks’ Pure Project line. The Drift splits the difference between the originalPure’s 4mm geometry and zero-drop by featuring an insole with a 4mm drop atop a fabric-covered Strobel board,so zero-drop can be had by simply removing the insole. The upper is open mesh with a few midfoot overlays andthe familiar Navband to secure the midfoot while flexing with it. The midsole features flex grooves in a traditionalplacement (but deeper) and two “Toe Flex” grooves that allow the metatarsals freedom both laterally and longitudinally. The outersole is a zigzag ribbon of rubber from the big toe, under the metatarsals, and down thelateral side to the heel, which provides a little more durability. The Pure Drift earned honors as our Best MinimalistShoe for Winter 2013.

“Plenty of room for my toes to spread. Light as a racer with great flexibility, but still enough support to feel that it’s a shoe.”

Heel/Forefoot Drop 0mm Sizes Men 7–13,14; Women 5–12 Weight 7.2 oz. (men’s 11); 6.1 oz. (women’s 8)

��

�!(&��$&�# ��The Torin is a new shoe to the Altra line, a young brand that has taken solid root in the minimalist market. Thebrand’s aesthetics take a step forward with this model, now packaging its roomy toe-box and foot-friendly shapein a sleeker design. The upper is open mesh with welded overlays and saddle-like, ghilley lacing across the midfootto securely wrap the foot for performance. The midsole has a generous 28mm stack height (15mm in the midsole),combined with the familiar Altra zero-drop geometry to provide the benefits of a minimal shoe with enoughcushion to keep from being beaten up. The segmented carbon outersole allows good flexibility and traction withoutweighing things down. The result is a daily trainer with zero-drop geometry.

“Really roomy in the toes; not too big or wide, just spacious. The ride is plush, but the foot is close to the ground, especiallythe heel.”

Heel/Forefoot Drop 0mm Sizes Men 8–13,14,15; Women 5.5,6.5–11,12 Weight 9.6 oz. (men’s 11); 8.4 oz.(women’s 8)

��MINIMALIST

WINTER 2013

��,)#$��)&'$&�'��Mizuno introduces its EVO line of two minimalist shoes with its characteristic twist. Though they’re similar—one aims at performance while the EVO Cursoris is a bit more plush—both have the same zero-drop geometryand lightweight approach. It’s light with a roomy forefoot and 12mm of foam underfoot. The upper is openairmesh in the forefoot (vamp) with smaller mesh on the heel (rear quarter). The midsole is Mizuno’s durable APfoam, which has a toughened skin in the areas where it’s exposed to the road. A visible insert under the metatarsalsprovides a slightly softer feel underfoot, and the overall shape encourages midfoot striking and a snappy toeoff.The Wave technology is provided by both shaping the forefoot insert and running the length of the midsole. Fordurability, the outersole is a sparse forefoot-only treatment of carbon rubber.

“Different than any shoes I’ve worn: snug and sleek in the heel, stretchy and roomy in the toes. The sole is cushy, but flexible. I’ve really enjoyed running in them.”


��*��!�#��#�")'��&��!��The New Balance Minimus 10 Trail has its first update as a tested veteran and the approach taken in Round 1continues here: pair 4mm geometry with a relatively low stack height, and use thin materials in the upper to keepthe weight down. The upper is an open mesh similar to the previous edition, the revised forefoot strap has beenslightly repositioned for comfort, and the tongue is now a traditional construction, although it’s partially anchoredto allow the shoe to fit more foot shapes. The midsole is virtually the same as before: a thin layer of foam with a4mm heel-to-toe drop that offers just enough protection to feel like a shoe, but also provides adequate feedback.The Vibram® outersole now features hexagon-like connections of rubber between the actual hexagon-shapedtreads from Round 1 to offer better traction, durability, and protection.

“Nice to see an updated shoe that doesn’t mess with what works. These are simple; fit great, plenty of toeroom, light andflexible, and nice and low to the ground.”


�!)��!� $��The Maliko is named after a bay on the island of Maui and this shoe’s suitability in both wet and dry situations isjust the beginning of that inspiration. Another notable feature of the Maliko is its split toe construction (the bigtoe is separated from its brethren), which increases the power and agility of your stride by providing better balance.The upper is a tough, closed mesh with welded supports, a wrapped arch, and swept heel cup of thin TPU withdrainage ports under the arch in case you’re running through water. Monosock construction hugs the foot, whilethin laces and a quick-snugging lace-lock complete the fit. There’s no midsole to speak of—the EVA Strobelboard and removable EVA arch pad in the heel handle those duties—allowing a zero-drop or very mild rampangle options. The outersole is durable carbon rubber, effectively textured to grip in wet conditions.

“Once you get past the look of the split toe, you realize these are comfortable performance running shoes. The design isawesome, light and flexible with good traction and nothing extra added.”

Heel/Forefoot Drop 0mm Sizes Men 7–12,13; Women 5,6–10,11 Weight 7.3 oz. (men’s 11); 6.2 oz. (women’s 8)

��)�$#+��&&�(��The Virrata derives its name from the Finnish verb “to flow,” an apt description of the performance of this lightand flexible shoe. The upper is a micromesh with well-placed, welded overlays to secure the foot. Though thin, itdoesn’t feel skimpy, but rather racer-like light. The midsole is the same rubbery compound used in both theKinvara and the Mirage, providing a resilient and responsive ride, with deep flex grooves making for an ultra-flex-ible sole. The majority of the outersole is toughened EVA with some carbon rubber on the highest-wear areas,particularly at the extremes of heel and toe, to improve traction at touch-down and toe-off. The Virrata bringscushioning, flexibility, and zero-drop geometry to everyday running.

“Really cushioned, but responsive, and light—nice and light. The zero drop isn’t really noticeable like some I’ve tried. Theseare more like a racer or lightweight training shoe.”


� ��&'��$��$#��The GoBionic joins the GoRunRide in Skechers’ growing minimal running shoe line. The GoBionic fine tunessome features, while employing the best of what works in the Ride. The soft and breathable synthetic upper issuitable for sockless wear. Supportive, sueded overlays give a little structure to the well-ventilated mesh. Themidsole features zero-drop geometry, but with a comfortable 16mm stack height and a flexible design that allowsthe foot to flex as it needs to. The entire outersole is segmented into numerous pods of toughened EVA andcarbon rubber in the high-wear portions at heel, toe, and select spots between. The result is a flexible and protective shoe that fits well without breaking the bank.

“Really flexible with a nice bounce. They are light and feel great on your bare feet. They are a little thin under the heel.”

Heel/Forefoot Drop 0mm Sizes Men 6.5–12,13,14; Women 5–10,11 Weight 6.2 oz. (men’s 11); 5.3 oz.(women’s 8)

CREGG WEINMANN is footwear and running products reviewer for Running Network LLC. He can be reached via email at [email protected] © 2013 by Running Network LLC. All Rights Reserved. No part of this article may be stored, copied, or reprinted without prior written permission of Running Network LLC. Reprinted here with permission.


June 16, 2013

womenshalfmarathon.com

Fun Cheer Teams along the Course • Post-Race Celebration with Live Music • Blingin’ Finishers Medal

Get ReadyYOU!

for a running event that celebrates...

Starting Blocks

By Dick Patrick of USA TrackNews

Next to the London Olympics, perhapsAmerica’s biggest track & field news storyof 2012 comes from Iowa.

The 104-year-old Drake Relays, long amajor feature of the early outdoor trackseason, has signed a new major sponsor,Hy-Vee supermarkets. According to aspokesperson, Hy-Vee has made a 5-yearcommitment, which for 2013 involvesapproximately $500,000 for prize moneyin track & field events, plus a 90-minuteESPN telecast, $120,000 in road race prizemoney and other activities. The meet,which shares the last weekend of April withthe Penn Relays, has signed an impressivelineup of elite athletes, including 16London medalists so far and moreexpected.

The new presenting sponsor, Hy-Vee, isan employee-owned, eight-state grocerychain headquartered in West Des Moines,with 235 stores in Iowa, Illinois, Kansas,Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, SouthDakota and Wisconsin. Its 60,000employees and more than $17 billion in

annual sales make it one of the 50 largestprivately owned U.S. companies.

Perhaps the most significant feature ofthis year’s Hy-Vee Relays sponsorship is aseries of “London Games Rematch” eventsthat will pit 2012 Olympic Gold medalistsagainst the finalists they defeated inLondon. They will compete for prizemoney of $50,000 for each rematch trackevent ($25,000, $15,000 and $10,000) and$25,000 ($12,000, $8,000 and $5,000) foreach rematch field event, with as many as10 events possibly involved (compared withthe Olympic Trials payouts of $4,000 foreach winner and a total of $12,000 perevent).

One top rematch race will be the men’s110 meter hurdles, with Gold medalist andworld record holder Aries Merritt, Silvermedalist Jason Richardson and Jamaica’sBronze medalist Hansle Parchment—allconfirmed entrants—plus five other tophurdlers, all eligible to win the money ifthey finish in the top three on Drake’s fast

The full list of Rematch events has notbeen announced, but among otherconfirmed London Gold medalists are pole

vaulters Jenn Suhr and Renaud Lavillenie,long jumper Brittney Reese and men’s 400hurdler Felix Sanchez. And probably manyother stars and their agents will be callingmeet director Brian Brown to ask if there’san open lane. In fact, says Brown, “that’salready happening, and it’s very refreshing.”

The 90-minute, tape-delayed telecast isscheduled for Saturday evening prime time,April 27, 8–9:30 p.m. Eastern, 7–8:30Central, etc., on ESPN2.

Hy-Vee has long used sports as anadvertising and promotional tool in itseight-state marketing area. The company’scurrent activities include sponsorship ofboth of Kansas City’s major league teams,the Royals in baseball and the Chiefs infootball, the annual Hy-Vee Triathlon inDes Moines, which features the world’shighest prize money and Iron Kidstriathlons in more than a dozenMidwestern markets, to name a few.

“It’ll elevate everything we do in termsof the types of elite athletes we draw,”Brown said. “So far the commitments we’vealready garnered suggest the elite stars willcome and compete for what we’reoffering.”

Brown added, “To have a local companyas strong as Hy-Vee take an interest in thiscommunity event is win-win for them andwin-win for us. We’re really proud of thepartnership.”

The Relays sponsorship reportedly grewout of an ongoing relationship betweenDrake and Hy-Vee. For example, Hy-Veedonated $300,000 last spring for a studentlearning commons, and the company hasalready sponsored some of the road racesthat are a part of the Relays.

USATF, which has worked for severalyears with the Penn Relays to produce theUSA vs. the World relay series, sees thesponsorship as a plus.

“It’s great news for the sport,” saidspokesperson Jill Geer. “We need morecompanies devoting resources and overallsupport to advance and elevate the sportand our athletes. Drake and Penn havelong coexisted, and both meets willcontinue to thrive and grow.” �


June 16, 2013

womenshalfmarathon.com

Fun Cheer Teams along the Course • Post-Race Celebration with Live Music • Blingin’ Finishers Medal

Get ReadyGet ReadyYOU!

Get ReadyYOU!YOU!

for a running event that celebrates...

newdate!newdate!


For the New York Road Runners(NYRR), the Oct. 29 superstorm calledSandy has been a lose-lose situation fromalmost every angle.

Encouraged by the city’s billionairemayor, Michael Bloomberg, the RoadRunners and its president, MaryWittenberg, announced that the INGNew York City Marathon would be runon its scheduled date, Sunday, Nov. 42012 and put the Club’s own emergencyplans and equipment to work alongsidethe city’s to help clean up the massivedestruction left by Sandy.

After thousands of protests from NewYorkers and New Jerseyites whose liveshad been disrupted by the storm causedBloomberg (and Wittenberg) to call offthe race, Wittenberg took the brunt ofthe blame. That included a lot of abusefrom the media; i.e., New York Postcolumnist Mike Vaccaro called her “heart-less” and “a fool” and recommended herimmediate firing. The L.A. Times/ChicagoTribune’s Philip Hersh, who a few yearsago named her the best candidate for thetop job at USATF, dubbed her “MaryWitlessberg.”

Since then, Wittenberg and the NYRRhave been working overtime dealing withthe financial issues raised by the race’seleventh-hour cancellation, involvingmost importantly the 47,500 entrants and

their nearly $12 million in entry fees, butalso a multitude of sponsors, televisionpartners, charities and travel organizationsthat brought in international entrants.

On December 20, NYRR announcedthree options for the 2012 entrants:

OPTION 1Refund. NYRR has always had a no-

refund policy, but for the 2012Marathon, entrants can get a full refundof their entry fee, less the $11 processingfee.

OPTION 2 Guaranteed entry to the NYC

Marathon for 2013, 2014, or 2015.Those choosing this option will be grant-ed guaranteed entry to the Marathon forthe year they choose. They’ll have to paythe processing and entry fees for whichev-er year they choose, but at no more thanthe 2012 rate.

OPTION 3 Guaranteed entry to the NYC Half

2013. This option guarantees entry to theNYC Half 2013 (March 17) as long asplaces are available, but entrants will berequired to pay all processing and entryfees.

In addition, those who signed up torun the 2012 Marathon on behalf of an

official NYC Marathon charity andobtained their entry from NYRR will beoffered the same options for 2013—and2013 only. And international runnerswho entered the 2012 race as part of atravel package with an official NYCMarathon International Travel Partnerwill be contacted directly by theirInternational Travel Partner to facilitatetheir options.

Here’s the tricky part: The optionscould be exercised only for a two-week period, January 10–25. The clericaland communications problem involvedshould test NYRR’s facilities as severely asSandy itself, and by the time you readthis, you’ll probably know how it turnedout.

The NYC marathon generates some$23 million of the club’s $60 millionbudget, and as noted, 2012 entry feesamounted to approximately $12 million.Even with a sizable insurance settlementfrom Lloyd’s of London, NYRR has takena substantial financial hit.

Looking beyond the current situation, Road Runners’ spokespersonRichard Finn told us, “The backbone ofNew York Road Runners activities hasbeen the unwavering support and encour-agement of U.S. athletes, and I don’tthink that’s going to change.” �

Stanford’s Miles Unterreiner personi-fied the term student athlete lastNovember when he competed in theNCAA Cross Country Championshipsin Louisville and interviewed for aRhodes Scholarship 2,000 miles away inSeattle on the same day.

Not that it was easy, competitively orlogistically. Thanks to an anonymousStanford benefactor and an OK from theNCAA, Unterreiner was able to pull itoff. The fifth-year senior, completing aMaster’s degree in History this fall,attended a Rhodes function and prelimi-nary interviews in Seattle on Friday, thentook a private plane to the meet inLouisville. After the race Saturday, hetook the private plane back to Seattle for

Yes, Virginia, There Really ARE Student Athletes—I

NYC Marathon Faces Financial Hurdles


The typical collegiate cross countryrunner—single and in the teens orearly 20s—could probably learnsomething from DIII women’schampion, Wisconsin–Oshkosh’sChristy Cazzola, 27, a mother oftwo.

An outstanding high schoolrunner who won Wisconsin statetitles at 800 and cross country,Cazzola decided not to attend col-lege after graduation, and, insteadwent to work. After jobs thatincluded working in a bakery andafter she had her first child, shedecided to attend college to earn adegree in nursing and increase herincome potential.

Now a senior, Cazzola, a four-time DIII track champion, won herfirst cross country title this fall. Theexperiences of working and being amother give her a perspective mostcollege athletes lack.

“Being in college, after all I’vebeen through, it’s much easier forme,” she told Running Times maga-zine. “When I hear college kidscomplaining about their professors,I’m thinking, ‘Hey, you’ve got itpretty good.’ I’m able to stayfocused, and I know what my goalsare. If I hadn’t done things the wayI did and had gone straight to col-lege, I’d be much more distracted. Ireally think everyone should take acouple of years off before going tocollege.” �

Yes, Virginia—II

the final interview.Had he not been able to attempt the double feat, he would

have attended the meet only and applied for a RhodesScholarship next year. “My team and my teammates have givenme so much over the last 4 years that it’s really tough for me tolet them down at this really important point in the season by notbeing there,” Unterreiner told the San Jose Mercury News.“There’s no way I can’t go to the national meet.”

Unfortunately, the story doesn’t have the happy ending itdeserved. Unterreiner finished 140th in the meet, as Stanford,tied for #2 in the pre-meet team rankings, finished 16th. And he

was not selected for that Rhodes Scholarship. But he did have hisshot, so give the NCAA—often an easy target for criticism—credit for allowing a real student athlete to test himself at thehighest levels of both his pursuits.

Track & field athletes, however, were not shut out for theprestigious academic honor to study a year or two at OxfordUniversity. Dakota McCoy (javelin, hurdles) of Yale and KatieWhitcombe (sprints, hurdles) of Navy both qualified for RhodesScholarships. �


• Ryan Hall, who bypassed a fall marathon while trying to gethealthy after a hamstring problem forced him to drop out of theLondon Olympics marathon, selected Italy’s Renato Canova, anadvisor to many Kenyan stars, as his coach. Hall had been coach-ing himself, calling the experiment after leaving Terrence Mahon“faith-based coaching.”

Hall wrote in a blog: “Now I feel God bringing me under anew coach to learn from and work with. In my study of trainingI have been drawn to the training methodology of Renato Cano-va. His system is different than anything I’ve been exposed to inthe past and his athletes are flourishing under it. So I’m very excit-ed to begin this new season of my professional career workingwith Coach Canova. I find his training to be most intriguing,challenging, but most importantly fun. I am very optimistic forthe year to come.”

• Terrence Mahon, whose athletes have included Deena Kastor,Morgan Uceny, wife Jen Rhines and Anna Pierce, has left theMammoth (CA) Track Club and has been hired by Great Britainto coach distance runners. Rhines, Uceny and Pierce plan to makethe move to England and maintain their affiliation with Mahon.Kastor and her husband, Andrew, have taken over the MammothTrack Club. Andrew Kastor, 35, is a former Adams State distancerunner steeped in the coaching philosophy of Joe Vigil, acofounder of the Mammoth TC and a believer in high-volume,high-altitude training.

• Alberto Salazar, who coached Britain’s Mo Farah and the USA’sGalen Rupp to a 1–2 finish in the London Olympics 10,000, haspicked up another phenom. Salazar started coaching Mary Cainlast fall. The high school sophomore and distance prodigy fromBronxville, New York will remain at Bronxville HS and followSalazar-written workouts supervised by a coach selected by Salazar.She will not compete for her high school team, and her familymust pay Salazar for his services so she can maintain her NCAAeligibility.

“My first priority is to clean up her biomechanics,” Salazartold Runner’s World. “Anything else you can fix later.”In her first major race under Salazar, Cain, who set a U.S. high

school mark of 4:11.01 while finishing 6th in the 1500 at theWorld Junior Championships, finished 2nd at the Nike CrossCountry Nationals, 4 seconds behind defending champ SarahBaxter.

• Dan Pfaff has returned to the U.S. after his stint as a nationalcoach in Great Britain to lead the country’s efforts for the Lon-don Games. Following Pfaff to the U.S is Britain’s Greg Ruther-ford, who was coached by Pfaff to the Gold medal in the longjump. They will be based in Phoenix. “It makes sense,” Ruther-ford, recuperating from a foot injury, told the BBC. “It’s a hot cli-mate, and it’s out of the way. While I’m there, I’ll have no dis-tractions.” �

Coaching Carousel

Grand Blue Mile Tapped to Host 2013–2014 USAMenʼs & Womenʼs 1-Mile Road ChampionshipsFrom USATF News

INDIANAPOLIS – Grand Blue Mile (GBM) and USATrack & Field (USATF) officials announced a 2-year agreementthat will bring the USA Men’s & Women’s 1-Mile RoadChampionships to Des Moines in 2013 and 2014 as part of theUSA Running Circuit. The championships will be contested aspart of the GBM, an annual event sponsored by Wellmark BlueCross and Blue Shield and the Drake Relays.

“We are excited to add the USA 1-mile road championshipsto the Midwest’s premier community street run,” said ChrisVerlengia, Wellmark senior sponsorships consultant. “TheGrand Blue Mile has continued to grow because of its appeal torunners of all ages and abilities—beginners, teams and profes-sional athletes have embraced the event and the city of DesMoines—and we are confident America’s top runners will lovethe event as well.”

More than 4,100 people participated in the 2012 GBM inthe elite, competitive, recreational run/walk and corporate teamcategories. Registrations for the 2013 event, scheduled for April23, are on track to meet or exceed that number with more than2,500 early registrations already received. The unique 1-mile,U-shaped course loops through the streets of downtown DesMoines, finishing in the downtown’s Western Gateway.

“We are very pleased to add the Grand Blue Mile to the

USA running circuit,” said Max Siegel, USATF CEO. “With atalented field of professional milers and a unique environmentfor spectators, we look forward to having the USA 1-milechampionships in Des Moines prior to the USA outdoor cham-pionships in June.”

The GBM has already hosted several top national and inter-national athletes during its 3-year history, including Sara Hall,who established a women’s course record of 4:45 in 2012, andPeter Van Der Westhuizen, who established the men’s courserecord of 4:02, also in 2012. Several 2012 Olympians areexpected to participate in the 2013 event and will beannounced closer to the event date.

The GBM is an annual 1-mile fitness run/walk, sponsoredby Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield in partnership withthe Drake Relays, to engage individuals at all stages of fitness,encourage healthy habits and empower positive change. Theannual wellness event includes recreational, competitive andinvitational events, featuring a field of elite male and femaletrack & field athletes from around the world. Proceeds fromthe event benefit Iowa Kidstrong, Inc., an organization dedicat-ed to promoting healthy, active lifestyles among youth. �

For more information about the GBM, visitwww.grandbluemile.com Visit www.usatf.org for more informa-tion on the USA 1-mile championships.

��%��""� �� $��&)#��$' &%*� '*�. ##��#��,�,*+�@?<@F4�A?@B� %��&*�&.4�,** �6��&�$�"��+��6�6�+��$4��%��+�#�+��$,*+��-�� +��)��%��*+�%��)�� *+�%��)�� +&'7B�2% *��+�+��$' &%*� '*��,%��A?<AB %� ��*� �& %�*4� �6� %� $&*+� �-�%+*4� .�9##� ��-�� +�)�� 6�6� �+�#�+�*��&$'�+ %�4��,+�* %��A?@@��&)#��$'*��&#��$��# *+*�)�� -��0�* %+&� +�� A?@B� �&)#�� $' &%*� '*4� +�� 6�6� . ##� ��-�� C� �+�#�+�*��&$'�+ %�� %�+�&*��-�%+*6��+��&)�*��,#�*��%��,'��+�*��&,+�+��6�6�+��$��+�+�� %�� 6��)%$&)��&,+�+��&)#��$' &%*� '*��+��

�� !�� $&%��,�� *��*�) �*�&��@C�$�!&)�+)��"�$��+*��)&$��0+&��'+�$��)�.��)��+�� *+�*+�)*�&��+��+)��"�3�2�#��&$'�+�6��.&&��+�&*��$��+ %�*�. ##�� %�+��6�6��%��0�AD4�+�� *��)�%��) / ��. ##��#��+��%��##9*�*#�%�� %��%��+�� ,$4�+��+� )��&��+�� $&%��,��$��+ %�*6��+,)��+�#�+�*��)��%�&&)��&)#��)��&)��&#��)��%%��,�)� %�+��'&#��-�,#+�=D6?A�$�+�)*4�@E<D6D>��%��A??C��#0$' ��&#��$��# *+��)�$0��) %�)6��&)�$&)�� %�&)$�+ &%4��*�.�##��*�+��)&��*+�*��,#�4�- * +��

�� *��&%�� $&%�� ,�� $��+ %�� %� +�� 6�6� *� +�� "��)��&%+� %��#�** �� &%� ,%�� @6�� $��+� �#*&� &1�)*� �) ��0� ��+� �+��0.�)�� #��&%��0�B@4�.��)��+��+� &' �%��)�+ &%�. ##��&#�� +*@?4???$�+) �#*��&)�+��&)#��$' &%*� '*8��$��+� *�%�$�� %��&%&)&��+��#�+��+�-��)��&%+� %�4�.�&��#��*��)&$�A???$�+&�@?4???$��%�.�*�&%��&��$�) ��%�),%% %�9*�$&*+��&#&)�,#��+�#�+�*6�� %��&,+�$&)��+��

�&##&.�+�� $&%��,��+��

Welcome to the IAAF News Page!Exclusively for the Running Network LLC

��!��!��&�� "�� !��)�"��#��"%� �+!��"�� "�!� ��!��"# ��$�!�"!��"�� !�

%�"�� !�� "")��""��" �%�"()��!�"��"��)�� )��#��*��"�� "��# �� "�� #��"��!��

�"��"��"�� "� �#��#"��#��#�'*

�� ...6),%% %�%�+.&)"6�&$ ��

��!�

�� '��"��#��* *��# �� !�� ""�) �*��)) ++� *� +��,))�%+��&)#��)��&)��&#��)� %� +��@@?$��,)�#�*=@A6F?>��%��+��A?@A��#0$' ��@??$��&#��$��# *+6��- * +��. +�� $�%�� *��&��%�)��*��$� %��&##��+�+ &%4�� %��)#0��') #6�

�*��0&,%��+�#�+�� %��&)� �4��) �*�'#�0��&&+��##��%��*"�+��##4�,+��-�%+,�##0��&&*��+)��"�3�2�#�6�� *�2)*+�)��-�)�.�*�),%% %��(,�# �0 %��)��+�D?�0�)�*��%��#*&�+��AA?��+�+��)*��0��$�*6�:�)�%* /�*��&%�*� %�+��D?��%��#&*+� %�+��2%�#6��#*&�)�%�+��AA?� %��&,+�AD*��&%�*4;��)�$�$��)*6��BD7*��&%��B??$��,)�#��+ $��+,)%��+��*'&+# ��+�&%�� *�),%% %��%��)�� -��*��&#�)*� '��)&$��%%�**��6�

:�.�*��&��0�� %��%��)*&%� %��&##��6�� %��+�,��+�$��$,��&��.��+��"%&.��&,+�+��,)�#�*6��&##&.�� %��+&��&##��+�+ &%4.��%��#��+�+&��&��+��/�*��3�6;��%�)��*��$4��-&#,%+��)��&��+��/�*��3�4� *��)) ++9*��,))�%+��&��%��:��*��, #+�&%�.��+�� %��+�,��+�$�6;�

�� .�+�� %�)��*� ',+� ��)) ++� +�)&,�� +.&� .&)"&,+*6� �%��&%��04��) �*��&%��%+)�+��&%��&,%� %��%�� *&$��*+)�%�+��.&)"# "��+�)&. %��*�&+�',+�. +��+.&��%�*4�*&$��*+�%� %��)&��!,$'4��%�&%�7#��&,%� %�6��,�*��0�.�*��)��*�** &%5��.�+�� $��,)�#�&-�)�C4�E4�@?4��%��@A��,)�#�*6��,*��.�*�')�'�) %��+&�)��&%�+��,'�&$ %��.��"�%�4��#&*��+��.&)"&,+�. +��# ��+�.� ��+7+)� % %�*�** &%6��+�� %%�)4��)) ++��&%2��4�:9$�*&)��+&% ��+6;�

� +��&+��&#��$��#��%�� %��%�4�&%��$ ��+�+� %"�+��+��) �*.&,#��-�� -��-�)0+� %�6� &+�*&6�:�0��&�#*��)��+&�),%�*,�7@B�*��&%�*��&)�+��@@?$��,)�#�*�� +�&)�$&)��+ $�*� %�A?@B4��%��#*&�+&. %�+��&#��$��#� %��&*�&.�A?@B6��,+�2)*+4��-��+&�$�"��+��6�6+��$� %�,%�8��+9*��#.�0*��)�8;�

�/+�,'�&%�� *�*��,#�� *��$��+� %��%�� 4�� %��&%��0�@F6

Dou

g Pe

nsin

ger –

Get

ty Im

ages

for I

AA

F

SPONSORED BY WWW.IAAF.ORG

ASICS.COM

2012. THE YEAR OF NEW PERSONAL BESTS.THE RE-ENGINEERED GT SERIES™.A twelve-time Runner’s World ® award winner and the ultimate shoe for the long run.

missouri runner and triathlete

Documents

development of skechers

triathlete spring

new york city marathon

boston marathon

hard workout

com4 missouri runner

giveskechers gorun

elite runner