mixed conifer/aspen group

41
Climate Change and Mixed Conifer/Aspen Systems in New Mexico: Considerations for Managers Jim Youtz, USFS Region 3 Marlin Johnson, Society of American Foresters Deb Allen-Reid, USFS Region 3 Anne Bradley, The Nature Conservancy Bryan Bird, WildEarth Guardians Carol Bada, NM Forestry Division Zander Evans, Forest Guild Pete Fulé, Ecological Restoration Institute Ken Smith, NMFWRI NM Forests and Climate Change

Upload: others

Post on 16-Oct-2021

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Climate Change and Mixed Conifer/Aspen Systems in New Mexico: Considerations for Managers

• Jim Youtz, USFS Region 3 • Marlin Johnson, Society of American Foresters• Deb Allen-Reid, USFS Region 3• Anne Bradley, The Nature Conservancy• Bryan Bird, WildEarth Guardians• Carol Bada, NM Forestry Division• Zander Evans, Forest Guild• Pete Fulé, Ecological Restoration Institute• Ken Smith, NMFWRI

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 2: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Highlights

• General description of mixed conifer

• Historic and current conditions

• Issues of particular concern

• Management strategies and recommendations

• Concluding thoughts

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 3: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Ecosystems Relative toGradients in Elevation & Moisture

Ele

va

tio

n (

ft)

4500

10,000

6000

7500

9000

Moisture Gradient

Moist DryIntermediate

Ponderosa Pine Forest

Mixed Conifer Forest

Spruce-Fir Forest

Piñon-Juniper

From John Vankat, 2008 mixed conifer management and ecology meeting

Page 4: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Valles CalderaNational Preserve, NM

Ridgetop with ponderosa pine

Slope with spruce

From John Vankat, 2008 mixed conifer ecology and management meeting

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 5: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Piñon-Juniper/Doug-fir/white pine/Ponderosa/hardwood mix of

species near Cloudcroft

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 6: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Mixed Conifer/Aspen Distribution

Approximately 2 million acres in NM

and Climate ChangeLandfire existing vegetation

Page 7: Mixed conifer/aspen group

North-FacingAspect

South-FacingAspect

Ridge

Valley Bottom

DenseS, F, & QA

Surface Fires +Occasional Crown Fires

OpenPP, DF, & QASurface Fires

OpenPP

Surface Fires

ModeratelyDense

PP, WF, DF, & QASurface Fires +

OccasionalCrown Fires

Historical Fire Pattern – Mixed Frequencies and Severities

From John Vankat, 2008 mixed conifer ecology and management meeting

Page 8: Mixed conifer/aspen group

North-FacingAspect

South-FacingAspect

Ridge

Valley Bottom

DenseS, F, & QA

OpenPP, DF, & QA

OpenPP

ModeratelyDense

PP, WF, DF, & QA

DensePP, DF, WF, & QA

ModeratelyDense PP

DensePP, WF, DF, & QA

With Fire Exclusion, Vegetation Became More Homogeneous

From John Vankat, 2008 mixed conifer ecology and management meeting

Page 9: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Distinguishing Between Mixed Conifer Forests

NM Forests and Climate Change

Dry/Frequent fire Wet/Mixed frequency

Page 10: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Dry Mixed Conifer

• Warmer and drier sites

• Frequent and low – moderate intensity fires

• Ponderosa pine major component

• Uneven-aged and patchy distribution of trees

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 11: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Changes in Dry Mixed Conifer

• Changes in fuel loading, stand structure, and species composition over time

• Currently a shift to “closed forests” with shade tolerant species in understory

• Seral species in decline

• Shift from FRCC 1 to FRCC 3

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 12: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Wet Mixed Conifer

• Cooler and wetter sites extending up to the spruce-fir zone

• Mixed severity and frequency of fire

• Aspen and Douglas-fir are dominant seral species

• Closed forests with even-aged and uneven-aged stands across the landscape

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 13: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Changes in Wet Mixed Conifer

• Currently late seral stages dominate the landscape

• Historically, early, mid, and late seral stages represented across the landscape

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 14: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Issues of Particular Concern

• Sublimation

• Insects and diseases

• Fire regime change and wind

• Wildlife concerns

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 15: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Sublimation

• Sublimation- the evaporation of water after snow interception by forest canopies

• Less evaporative loss when snow falls on the ground

• Warmer winter = less sublimation and earlier spring run-off?

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 16: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Host Causal AgentDry

Winter

Warm

Winter

Dry

Summer

All conifers Bark beetles

Douglas-fir,

white fir,

spruce

Western spruce

budworm ? ? ?

Douglas-fir and

white fir

Douglas-fir tussock

moth ? ? ?

All conifers

in mixed conifer

stands

(Sacramento

Mts.)

Nepytia janetae, a

winter defoliating

caterpillar of conifers

AspenWestern tent

caterpillar ? ? ?

Climate Change Effects on Selected Insects

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 17: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Host Causal AgentDry

Winter

Warm

Winter

Dry

Summer

All species Root diseases ? ? ?

Southwestern

white, limber,

and

bristlecone

pines

White Pine Blister

Rust ? ?

Conifers Dwarf Mistletoes neutral neutral neutral

Climate Change Effects on Selected Diseases

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 18: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Impacts of Insects or Disease Depend on Condition of the Host

• Conditions that cause reduced sap pressure (drought, competition, injury) favor bark beetles

• Interactions among host, weather, and defoliators are less understood

• Drought reduces spread of mistletoe but infected trees will be at even greater stress

• Biotic agent interactions with environment and host are complex

NM Forests and Climate Change

more stress = greater vulnerability

Page 19: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Aspen Decline

• Large-scale decline in vigor of aspen clones

• Drought followed by insects

• In New Mexico, shade tolerant conifers replacing aspen

• Elk and regeneration

• Change in fire frequency

and intensity

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 20: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Fire Regime Change and Wind

• Westerling et al. 2006 – increased wildfire frequency and duration and longer fire seasons in mid-elevation forests of the Rockies

• Fried et al. 2004 – warmer and windier conditions in northern California

• Earlier snowmelt combined with increased length of windy season during spring in New Mexico?

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 21: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Longer Spring/Windy Season And Human Starts

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 22: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Wildlife Concerns

• NM Department of Game and Fish indicates climate change, drought, fire regime change, and insect attack are threats to mixed conifer forests in New Mexico

NM Forests and Climate Change

Photo by Mark Watson

Page 23: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Wildlife Concerns

• These threats will alter wildlife habitat

• Riparian habitat embedded in mixed conifer requires attention too

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 24: Mixed conifer/aspen group

MSO

NM Forests and Climate Change

Photo courtesy of Mark Watson

Page 25: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Mexican Spotted Owl

• Mixed conifer for nesting and roosting

• Prefers high canopy cover and complex structure

• Landscape planning key to resolving conflict about treatments

• Treat drier mixed conifer and create a mosaic of seral stages across the landscape

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 26: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Amphibians

• Jemez Mountains salamander

• Prefers decayed Douglas-fir logs and wet sites

• Elevated site temperatures and lower site moisture negatively impact the salamander

• Maintenance of mid-late seral stage mixed conifer

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 27: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Jemez Salamander

NM Forests and Climate Change

Photo courtesy of Mark Watson

Page 28: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Management Strategies and Recommendations

• We will address the three adaptive strategies presented in Millar et al. 2007

• Resilience

• Response

• Resistance

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 29: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Resilience Option

• Improve capacity of system to return to desired condition after disturbance

• In dry mixed conifer, restoration of conditions so that the forest is resilient to disturbances within HRV

• Fuel loading, stand structure, and species composition compatible with frequent fire regime

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 30: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Some Desired Changes (dry mixed conifer)

• Reduce tree density while promoting spatial heterogeneity

• Restore dominance of Ponderosa pine

• Regeneration of early seral species

• Reduce dominance of shade tolerant species

• Reduce fuel loadings

• Reintroduce surface fire

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 31: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Resilience – Wet mixed conifer

• Restore a mix of seral stages across the landscape

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 32: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Desired Changes (wet mixed conifer)

• Reduce landscape continuity of homogeneous forest phases (especially climax phases)

• Increase representation of stands at early or mid-successional stages

• Promote and protect aspen regeneration

• Reintroduce surface fire

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 33: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Resilience Option

• Restoration of burned areas (uncharacteristically hot fires)

• Targeted reforestation on dry sites

• In wet mixed conifer, reforestation includes protection of aspen regeneration

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 34: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Response Option

• Facilitate transition from current to new conditions

• On dry sites, convert from late seral stage to early seral stage (short-term goal)

• Long-term – see how site responds, then adapt

• At lower elevations, facilitate conversion to pine or pine/oak

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 35: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Response Option

• In wetter zones, facilitate conversion of contiguous and homogeneous climax forests to a mix of seral stages (short-term)

• Apply historical reference conditions from drier sites to wetter sites

• Apply surface fire and thin fir (Abies) to enhance changes in vegetative composition

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 36: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Resistance Option

• Adopt a protective strategy for important wildlife habitat (MSO, Jemez salamander)

• Southwestern white pine – manage to maintain or increase white pine composition

• Ponderosa on wet sites - protect

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 37: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Constraints

• Managing small parcels, especially in the WUI

• Limited access and road infrastructure

• Limited financial resources

• Markets for thinning products

• Thinning and logging crews

• Smoke management

• Slash management and insects

• Multi-jurisdictional planningNM Forests and Climate Change

Page 38: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Constraints

• Widespread nature of late seral mixed conifer

• Impacts of management in lower elevation forests

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 39: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Concluding Thoughts

• Clear need for landscape-scale and multi-jurisdictional planning

• Forest ERA wood supply and Prather et al. 2008

• Create agreement over treatable acres and focus resources where most needed

• Use of New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 40: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Concluding thoughts

• Monitoring!

NM Forests and Climate Change

Page 41: Mixed conifer/aspen group

Mixed conifer working group

NM Forests and Climate Change