mixing engineering and biology

36
1 Mixing engineering and biology

Upload: gerard

Post on 24-Feb-2016

20 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Mixing engineering and biology. Where Fish Passage is required. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mixing engineering and biology

1

Mixing engineering and biology

Page 2: Mixing engineering and biology

Where Fish Passage is required

Connectivity is required across the landscape wherever there are fish. Fish and fish habitat assessments standards are under development for TRANS. These are will indicate species specific and crossing specific information so sensitive sites (such as spawning sites) can be avoided when planning the location of watercourse crossing sites.

2

Page 3: Mixing engineering and biology

Even areas that don’t exactly look like spawning habitat ….

3

Page 4: Mixing engineering and biology

…require fish passage.

4

Page 5: Mixing engineering and biology

5

In terms of culverts, dependent on one’s viewpoint, a culvert providing fish passage is envisioned as either this:

Page 6: Mixing engineering and biology

6

or this………..

Page 7: Mixing engineering and biology

7

Fish Passage Criteria

• Culvert Diameter• Culvert Slope• Roughness• Velocity• In certain cases, type of fish species

and invertebrate species

Page 8: Mixing engineering and biology

8

In the past, TRANS had approached regulatory agencies in comparing velocities and depths in a stream to what was in the culvert.• For example, we used to produce

this type of table:

• Note: This has now been updated.

Channel Culvert

Discharge (cms)

Stream Depth (m or Y)

Mean Stream Velocity

(m/s or V)

Inlet Outlet

Depth (m)

Mean Velocity

(m/s)

Depth (m)

Mean Velocity

(m/s) 2.3 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.67 0.5 0.49 4.5 0.75 1.0 .75 0.97 .75 0.76 7.4 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.26 1.0 1.04

Page 9: Mixing engineering and biology

9

Unfortunately, we didn’t realize that the relationship between hydrotechnical design parameters was not clear to folks that weren’t used to dealing with it. For example, how did flow relate to velocity?

Page 10: Mixing engineering and biology

10

???

Page 11: Mixing engineering and biology

11

In order to create this basic understanding with everyone we’ve used a real life example to illustrate

the process.In this we are using the new (draft)

Fish Passage Design Discharge (FPDD).

Page 12: Mixing engineering and biology

12

The project involves 12 watercourse crossings – 3 of which are fish bearing. The fish species that is present is Athabasca Rainbow Trout.

Page 13: Mixing engineering and biology

13

Athabasca Rainbow Trout sampled along Highway 32

Page 14: Mixing engineering and biology

14

This is fish habitat.

Page 15: Mixing engineering and biology

So is this.

15

Page 16: Mixing engineering and biology

16

This is one of the culvert crossings we will be replacing.

Page 17: Mixing engineering and biology

17

We’ve approached the issue of fish passage by using a series of

informational tools. It proves due diligence and we now have a record

of the site.Here are some of the tools.

Page 18: Mixing engineering and biology

18

We produced individual site analyses using satellite imagery.

Page 19: Mixing engineering and biology

19

• Topographic

Page 20: Mixing engineering and biology

20

Basin Size

Page 21: Mixing engineering and biology

21

• Slope

Crossing 2

Page 22: Mixing engineering and biology

22

Site 2 – Slope Summary

• Channel Slope At Crossing S~ 1.2%• Upstream of Crossing S~ 2.9 to 6.2%• Downstream of Crossing S~ 1.8%• (entering receiving channel)

Page 23: Mixing engineering and biology

23

In comparison Site 3 Topographic

Page 24: Mixing engineering and biology

Basin

24

Page 25: Mixing engineering and biology

25

Slope

Crossing 3

Page 26: Mixing engineering and biology

26

Site 3 – Slope Summary

• Channel Slope At Crossing S~ 1.1%• Upstream of Crossing S~ 3.2 to

8.0%• Downstream of Crossing S~ 0.8%(entering receiving channel)

Page 27: Mixing engineering and biology

27

Summary Table

Inlet Outlet9540 (2) 22 28 2.0 1.2 1.35 0.39 1.1 1.1 1.1

Y @ QFPDD

(m)

VelocityFPDD

Culvert (m/s)

QFPDD

(m3/s) *

Channel (m/s)

Site DA (km2)

QDesign

(m3/s)

Y @ QD

(m)

Stream Slope at Site (%)

Design flow and corresponding flow depths calculated as per AT's Hydrotechnical Design Guidelines.* Based on AT's discussion of the recommended fish passage design discharge

Definitions:DA = Gross Drainage Area (km2)Q Design= flow (cubic meters per second)Y@ QD= depth at design flowQDesign = flow (cubic meters per second)

Y @ QD = average channel flow depth at design flow (discharge)

QFPDD = flow at fish passage design discharge

Y @ QFPDD = depth at fish passage design discharge

Velocity FPDD = velocity at fish passage design discharge

Page 28: Mixing engineering and biology

28

 Definitions:  • Q - Discharge = the rate of flow of

water. It is the volume of water passing through a cross section of a channel in a given period of time. This is not a constant value; it is constantly changing. It is expressed as cubic meters per second (CMS)

• A - Area = Cross sectional area of flow in the channel.

• V - Velocity = the mean velocity for the cross section, as determined by V=Q/A.

Page 29: Mixing engineering and biology

29

Definitions:  • Y - depth of flow• B – channel bed width• h – hydraulic bank height • T – top width• S – channel slope• n – roughness parameter

Page 30: Mixing engineering and biology

30

Figure 1. Typical Channel Parameters: B=2.5, h=1.0, T=5.0, S= 1. 2%, n=0.06

Design flow parameters: Fish passage design flow parameters: QD = 28 m3/s QFPDD = 1.35 m3 YD = 1.5 m, YFPDD = 0.39 VD = 2.6 m/s VFPDD = 1.1/1.1 (Inlet/Outlet) Cross-sectional area for QD = AD = 6 m2 Cross-sectional area for QFPDD = AFPDD = 2 m2

Page 31: Mixing engineering and biology

31

• Although implicit in this presentation TRANS embeds culverts to D/4 up to 1 meter

Page 32: Mixing engineering and biology

32

Techniques we are using to enable fish passage in steeper creeks 1% and greater.

Substrate Holders

Page 33: Mixing engineering and biology

33

In culverts located on higher gradient streams and those where culvert velocities at the FPDD exceed those in the natural channel, substrate holders can help to provide more low velocity zones. 

Page 34: Mixing engineering and biology

34

Substrate holders are small weirs installed in the culvert to retain substrate in the culvert. The substrate provides additional roughness to reduce velocities, with an added benefit of flow variation. This method is typically effective for long culverts where backwater effects are lost.

Page 35: Mixing engineering and biology

35

• Substrate holders are designed to hold an engineered streambed in the culvert while allowing for natural sediment transport processes to occur in the stream.

• for culverts ≤ 3 m in diameter, 200 mm high weirs should be used with Class 1M rock riprap, and

• for culverts > 3 m in diameter, 300 mm high weirs should be installed with Class1 rock riprap.

•  

Page 36: Mixing engineering and biology

36

• The maximum spacing of the substrate holders is equivalent to the substrate holder height divided by the slope of the culvert.  

• Currently the effect of these substrate holders is being researched.

• More information is available in the draft ‘Culverts and Fish Passage’.