(m)learning in the (wide) open: a presentation delivered as part of #ilmws
DESCRIPTION
The presentation was delivered as part of the Interagency Mobile Learning Webinar Series (#IMLWS) on May 21, 2014. http://www.adlnet.gov/interagency-mobile-learning-webinar-series-2014//TRANSCRIPT
- 1. @mseangallagher May, 2014 http://michaelseangallagher.org [email protected]
2. Research mLearning Humanities Multimodality Field activity Informal/formal learning M4D 3. Questions 1. Mobility and motion in teaching and learning? 2. Deep learning? 3. Think and speak across modes, media, and spaces? 4. Observations Incomplete understanding how learning works in open spaces (or how to define open at all) Miniaturization of content/activities requires balance and contextualization (w/bigger picture thinking) Process-oriented approach/pedagogy avoids technological determinism 5. Decisions STEM or non-STEM? Fuzzy ideas or discrete outputs? Process over outcome? Method or madness? 6. Observations Contextualization (Introduction, Orientation) Learning Process (Alignment, Discussion, Articulation, Initial Compositions) Outputs, Assessments and Literacies 7. Observations Contextualization (Introduction, Orientation) Learning Process (Alignment, Discussion, Articulation, Initial Compositions) Outputs, Assessments and Literacies 8. Open Space 9. Open: A definition Open= a state inclusivity objects, artifacts, places, people and events. It is also a mental state that acknowledges that meaning is gleaned from an alignment with what is available (Gallagher, Ihanaeinen, 2014). 10. Learning in the Open 11. Learning in the Open: Alignment 12. Learning in the Open: Alignment 13. Learning in the Open: Needs 14. Learning in the Open: Pedagogy 15. Learning in the Open: Events Formal Helsinki (x2) Seoul (x2) Talinn Informal Edinburgh London New York 16. Learning in the Open: Process 1. Open, informal workshop 2. Participant-driven 3. Objectives loosely defined 4. Data collected 5. Data reflected upon 6. Data composed 7. Scrutinized through dialogue/discussion 17. Learning in the Open: Process 1. Loosely negotiate a theme 2. Collect data 3. Identify themes emerging from data 4. Compose, present and share (OER) 18. Learning in the Open: Themes 19. Learning in the Open: Outputs * https://www.flickr.com/photos/peeii/14092475623/in/photostream 20. Learning in the Open: Outcomes 21. Potential for organizations 22. Potential for pedagogy 23. References 1. Gallagher, M. (2013). mLearning Workshop in Helsinki: Documenting the city through architecture, religion, sound, habitus. Retrieved May 8, 2014 from http://michaelseangallagher.org/mlearning-workshop-in-helsinki-documenting- the-city-through-architecture-religion-sound-habitus/ 2. Gallagher, M. S., & Ihanainen, P. Mobile Learning Field Activity: Pedagogy of Simultaneity to Support Learning in the Open. Retrieved May 8, 2014 from http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/abstracts/pdf/gallagher.pdf. 3. Gallagher, M. (2013). mField Activities in the Humanities. Retrieved May 8, 2014 from http://michaelseangallagher.org/elearning/lessons-and-teaching/mfield- activities-in-the-humanities/. 4. Ross, J., Bayne, S., & Macleod, H. (2011). Manifesto for Teaching Online. Retrieved May 8, 2014 from http://onlineteachingmanifesto.wordpress.com 5. Pachler, N., Bachmair, B., Cook, J., & Kress, G. (2010). Mobile learning. Boston, MA: Springer. 6. Farman, J. (2012). Mobile interface theory. Embodies Space and Locative Media. New York and London: Routledge. 7. Knox, J. (2013) Five Critiques of the Open Educational Resources Movement. Teaching in Higher Education, DOI:10.1080/13562517.2013.774354 24. @mseangallagher May, 2014 http://michaelseangallagher.org [email protected]