model qcc nec
TRANSCRIPT
1
2
WELCOMENational Convention
Quality circle 2010
3
LEADERPHILEMON
DEPUTY LEADERMONISHA
SAMARTHTEAM MEMBERS
RECODER TIME KEEPERGEETHIKA DARSHAN
4
SAMARTH
5
ACTIVE MEMBER
ACTIVE MEMBER
RAJESH ANGELACTIVE MEMBER
ABDUL
SAMARTH
6
7
Ms.CHETHANAFACILITATORS
CO-ORDINATOR: Mrs.ASHA
SAMARTH
Ms.PALLAVI
8NEC BANGALORE
CP-04 : Diploma in ElectronicsCP-08 : Diploma in Computer EngineeringCP-09 : Diploma In Information TechnologyCP-10: Post Diploma In Power ElectronicsSpecial Course : NCVT(Only for physically challenged)
SAMARTH
9
TEAM PROFILE:Date of formation Day of meetingVenue of meetingDuration of meetingNo of meetingsAttendance%Project under takenProject completed
: 2nd,Dec 09: Wednesday: Classroom 3: 2 Hours: 21 no.: 100%: 01: 01
SAMARTH
AIM:“TO DESIGN THE FUTURE
WITH QUALITY AND INNOVATION.”
SAMARTH
OBJECTIVE:
“TO UNIFY THE POTENTIAL OF OUR TEAM
TO REACH THE ESTEEM LEVEL OF QUALITY.”
SAMARTH
Steps followed
in our QC
process .
12
SAMARTH
Identification of problem
Selection of problem Definition of problem Analysis of problem Cause and effect analysis
Root cause analysis
SAMARTH
Data analysis on root cause
Development of solution
Foreseeing probable resistance
Trial implementationRegular implementation
Follow up review
SAMARTH
Process Decision Program
Chart
SAMARTH
SAMARTH QC teamprocess
Identification of the problem
Brain stormingtechnique Past experience
Data collection
Selection of theproblem
Definition of The problem
stratification Matrix diagramData collection
A
SAMARTH
Analysis of the problem
Pareto chart & Check list
Validation & Why-Why Analysis
Root cause analysis
Cause & effect diagram
Cause & effect analysis
4W & 1H Technique
A
B
SAMARTH
17
Pie chartData collection
Development of solutions
Data analysis on route cause
Regular implementation
Trial implementation
Foreseeing probable resistance
B SAMARTH
Follow up review18
IDENTIFICATION OF
PROBLEMS
STEP1 SAMARTH
19
20
SAMARTH
IDENTIFIED 67 PROBLEMS
BRAIN STORMING&
DATA COLLECTION
SAMARTH
21
1. No proper utilization of components tester by trainees.2. No proper maintenance of first aid box.3. Submission of assignments, notes & records are not done properly by
trainees.4. No frequent conduction of seminars.5. No proper utilization of transformer winding machine by trainees.6. No proper utilization of pneumatic and hydraulic labs by trainees.7. No proper conduction of open forums.8. Lack of experienced faculties.9. No proper guidance for doing projects.10.No proper transportation facilities for 1st years.11. Non availability of lockers in 1st year campus.12.No proper information regarding mess bills.13.No updating of syllabus for IInd & IIIrd years.14.Services like Xerox, printout etc, are not provided for trainees.15.No proper equipments in physics lab for 1st year trainees.16.No proper contact with other engineering collages.
LISTED PROBLEMS SAMARTH
22
17.No proper maintenance of 5’s box .18.No proper exposure of projects done by the trainees.19.No proper maintenance of projectors, OHP’s and junction boxes.20.No proper utilization of the machines using in workshop.21.No proper allocation of particular workbenches to the trainees.22.High failure in practical's .23.Lack of trouble shooting skills in trainees.24.Lack of knowledge about non-working of equipments in trainees.25.No updation of components status list in labs.26.No proper allocation of equipments to the particular trainees in AE-II lab.27.Consuming more time for taking extra labs.28.No awareness regarding the safety precaution to be followed in
workshop.29.Lack of basic knowledge in trainees.30.No proper interaction between seniors and juniors.31.Lack of component testers in analog lab AE-II.32. In efficient utilization of working hours by trainees.33. Improper working of DTK’s and mp-kits.
SAMARTH
23
34. Non availability of class rooms for extra classes.35.No proper allocation of time for sports, to the trainees.36. No proper net facility for second year trainees.37. No proper co-curricular activities are conducted for trainees.38. Insufficient no. of technical portraits in labs and class rooms.39. No proper conduction of safety week.40. Completion of syllabus is not done on time by the faculties.41. Activities are not carried out as mentioned in the activity calendar.42. Non availability of tools in workshop.43. Lack of necessary books in library for trainees.44. No fire alarm system in campus.45. No proper information regarding the absence of faculties.46. No proper information regarding industries. 47. Non availability of components during extra labs.48. Mis -utilization of library cards by trainees.49. Wastage of time in collecting the components in labs.50. No proper maintenance of class rooms.
SAMARTH
24
51. No lab manuals to guide the trainees.52. Lack of components in analog lab II53. Wastage of electricity in classrooms.54. No hobby projects are allocated in 4th semester.55. No drinking water facility in working area.56. Non- availability of required software's.57. No proper engagement of classes in the absence of allocated facilities.58. Components are not issued in right time for projects.59. Insufficient stationary items in general stores.60. Time is not allocated for utilizing library facility.61. Improper time management in conducting assembly62. No proper guidance from faculties during extra labs.63. Lack of library facility for first year trainees.64. No proper usage of daily dairy by trainees.65. No proper guidance for visitors 66. No proper awareness regarding new software.67. No proper 5’s activities are followed in labs and classrooms by the trainees.
SAMARTH
25
SELECTION OF PROBLEM
STEP2 SAMARTH
26
IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS
A
CB
CATEGORIZATION: SAMARTH
27
The problems which can be solved only by the trainees.
The problems which can be solved by the trainees with the minimum help of the management .
The problems which can be solved only by the management.
Category A:
Category B:
Category C:
SAMARTH
-CATEGORY A13 SAMARTH
29
A- category SAMARTH
1. High failure rate in practical's.2. Lack of trouble shooting skills in trainees.3. No improvement in the internal’s percentage level of CP04 II year
trainees.4. Consuming more time for taking extra labs.5. Lack of basic knowledge in trainees.6. No proper interaction between seniors and juniors.7. Lack of component testers in analog electronics lab-II.8. No regular check up of suggestion box.9. No updating of component status list in labs.10. Lack of knowledge about the working of equipments in first year
trainees.11.No awareness, regarding the safety precautions to be followed in
workshop.12.Lack of junction boxes in CP04 II year class rooms.13.No proper allocation of particular workbench to the trainees.
20 -CATEGORY B SAMARTH
31
1. No proper maintenance of 5’s box .2. No proper exposure of projects done by the trainees.3. No proper utilization of the machines using in workshop.4. No proper utilization of components tester by trainees.5. No proper maintenance of first aid box.6. Submission of assignments, notes & records are not done properly by trainees.7. No frequent conduction of seminars.8. No proper utilization of transformer winding machine by trainees.9. No proper utilization of pneumatics and hydraulics labs by trainees.10. No proper 5’s activities are followed in labs and classrooms by trainees.11. Improper working of DTK’s and mp-kits.12. No proper usage of daily dairy by trainees.13. No proper guidance for visitors.14. No proper awareness regarding new software.15. No proper information regarding industries.16. Non availability of components during extra labs.17. Mis -utilization of library cards by trainees.18. Wastage of time in collecting the components in labs.19. No proper maintenance of class rooms.20. Consuming more time for taking extra labs.
B- category SAMARTH
-CATEGORY C34 SAMARTH
33
1. No proper conduction of open forums.2. Lack of experienced faculties.3. No proper guidance for doing projects.4. No proper transportation facilities for 1st years.5. Non availability of lockers in 1st year campus.6. No proper information regarding mess bills.7. No updating of syllabus for IInd & IIIrd years.8. Services like Xerox, printout etc, are not provided for trainees.9. No proper equipments in physics lab for 1st year trainees.10.No proper contact with other engineering collages.11.No proper guidance from faculties during extra labs.12.Lack of library facility for first year trainees.13.Non availability of class rooms for extra classes.14.No proper allocation of time for sports, to the trainees.15.No proper net facility for second year trainees.16.No proper co-curricular activities are conducted for trainees.17.Insufficient no. of technical portraits in labs and class rooms.
c- category: SAMARTH
34
18.No proper conduction of safety week.19.Completion of syllabus is not done on time by the faculties.20.Activities are not carried out as mentioned in the activity calendar.21. Non availability of tools in workshop.22. Lack of necessary books in library for trainees.23. No fire alarm system in campus.24. No proper information regarding the absence of faculties.25. No lab manuals to guide the trainees.26. Lack of components in analog lab II27. Wastage of electricity in classrooms.28. No hobby projects are allocated in 4th semester.29. No drinking water facility in working area.30. Non- availability of required software's.31.Components are not issued in right time for projects.32. Insufficient stationary items in general stores.33. Time is not allocated for utilizing library facility.34. Improper time management in conducting assembly.
c- category: SAMARTH
35
1. No regular check up of suggestion box.Sol: Allocating leaders to collect the suggestions and to inform the academic in-charge for every month.2. No updation of component status list in labs.Sol: Updating the component status list in labs.3. Lack of knowledge about the working of equipments in first year trainees.Sol: Preparing and pasting the checklist on each and every work bench.4. No awareness, regarding the safety precautions to be followed in workshop.Sol: Preparing and pasting the safety precautions on the machines in the workshop.5. Lack of junction boxes in CP04 II year class rooms.Sol: Provided junction boxes for CP04 II year class rooms. 6. No proper allocation of particular workbench to the trainees.Sol: Preparation of seating sequence to the trainees in AE-I and AE-II labs.
SAMARTHThe problems which can be solved
then & there, and their solutions
36
1. High failure rate in practical's.2. Lack of trouble shooting skills in trainees.3. No improvement in the internal’s percentage level of CP04 II year trainees.4. Consuming more time for taking extra labs.5. Lack of basic knowledge in trainees.6. No proper interaction between seniors and juniors.7. Lack of component testers in analog electronics lab-II.
SAMARTH The problems which cannot be solved then & there
37
REPRESENTATION OF SELECTED DATA IN THE
FORM OF CHECK SHEET
SAMARTH
38
PROBLEM TALLY NO.OF VOTES
CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY
% CUMMULATIVE %
1. No improvement in the internal’s percentage level of CP04 2nd year trainees
IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIIIIIII IIII IIII IIII IIII
70 70 44.03 44.03
2.Lack of trouble shooting skills in trainees.
IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIIIIIII
35 105 22.01 66.04
3. Lack of basic knowledge in trainees.
IIII IIII IIII IIII 19 124 11.95
77.99
4. Consuming more time for taking extra labs.
IIII IIII III 13 137 8.18 86.17
5. High failure rate in practical’s.
IIII IIII 10 147 6.29 92.46
6. No proper interaction between seniors and juniors.
IIII III 8 155 5.03 97.49
7. Lack of component testers in analog electronics lab –II.
IIII 4 159 2.51 100
CHECK SHEET SAMARTH
39 0
10
20
30
120
110
10090807060
50
40
140130
10
20
30
90
80
70
60
50
40
92.46
44.03
66.04
86.17Vital few
Trivial many
100
1 2 3 4 5 6
FREQUENCY
PERCENTAGE
NO.OF PROBLEMS
70
35
1913 10 08
77.79
150
160
04
97.49
7
1. No improvement in the internal’s percentage level of CP-04 II year trainees.
2. Lack of trouble shooting skills in trainees.
3. High failure rate in practical's.
4. Consuming more time for taking extra labs.
5. Lack of basic knowledge in trainees.
6. No proper interaction between seniors and juniors.
7. Lack of components in analog electronics lab-II
PARETO CHART: SAMARTH
40
OUR PROBLEM:
NO IMPROVEMENT IN THE INTERNAL’S PERCENTAGE LEVEL OF CP04 II YEAR
TRAINEES.
SAMARTH
41
Definition of the problem
STEP 3 SAMARTH
42
DEFINITION OF PROBLEM
By Considering the Statistics(i.e., the Internal’s Percentage
Level) of CP04 II year Trainees from the
Exam Cell.
SAMARTH
43
PERCENTAGE
Graph, representing the “THEORY” internal’ s
percentage level of past 3 batches of cpo4 II year.
SAMARTH
Batches
44
A Graph, representing the “PRACTICAL” internal’s percentage level of past 3 cpo4 II year batches. P
ERCENTAGE
SAMARTH
Batches
45
We aim,
To Improve the Internal ‘s
Percentage Level of CP04 II year
trainees.
SAMARTH
46
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Analysis of the problem
Cause and effect analysis
Root cause analysis
Data analysis on root cause
Development of solutions
Foreseeing probable resistances
Trial implementation
Regular implementation
Follow up review
Meeting noSteps
MILESTONE CHART SAMARTH
STEP 4 SAMARTH
Analysis Of The Problem
48
What is the problem?No improvement in the internal’s percentage level of CP04 II year trainees.When does it occur? During an academic year.Where does it occur ? In internal’s percentage level of CP04 II year trainees.Who are affected ? Second year trainees are affected.How does it effect ? No decrement in the backlogs of trainees.
4W 1H Analysis SAMARTH
49
STEP 5 SAMARTH
CAUSE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS
50Material
Wastage of time in collecting the
components from other
labs.
Wastage of time to get the
belongings in between the class hours.
Wastage of time to arrange stationary,
junction boxes and OHP for the classes.
Consumption of time in identifying working and
non working components.
Inefficient utilization of working hours by
trainees.
Insufficient time for doing experiment
by the trainees.
Wastage of time in collecting the belongings in between the classes.
Utilization the lab hours for completion of the records.
Trainees are not attending the class on time.
ManMachineRequired
software's for the trainees
are not installed in systems.
Trainees are not sure that whether the existing
component testers are working or not
No proper outcome in labs due to increase in
non working equipments .
Interruptions occurring
during practical session.
No engagement of classes in the
absence of concerned faculties.
Consumption of time for the trainees to get his doubts
cleared for doing the further experiment.
Wastage of time for submission of files
& records.Method
No improvement in the internal’s % level of CP04 2nd
year trainees
SAMARTH
51
Inefficient utilization of
working hours by trainees.
Insufficient time for doing experiment by
the trainees.
Utilization the lab hours for completion
of records.
Variation of time in clocks in our institute.
In ability to manage the time by trainees.
Lockers are not kept in the required places.
Wastage of time for giving daily attendances.
Trainees are unable to complete the assignments in the allocated time.
Trainees are not attending the class
on time.
Wastage of time in
collecting the belongings in between the
classes.
There is no centralized timing system.
Utilization more time than the allocated time for a particular activity.
Trainees are not following the lab procedure.
MAN SAMARTH
52
Mishandling the equipments by
trainees .
Improper maintenance
of working equipments.
No proper maintenance record regarding the testers
available in lab.
No knowledge about the working of
equipments.
No proper calibration of the working equipments.
MACHINE
No proper outcome in labs due to
increase in non working equipments.
Required software's for
the trainees are not installed in
systems.
Trainees are unable to identify whether
the existing component testers
are in working condition.
SAMARTH
53
Wastage of time to get the belongings in
between the class hours.
Consumption of time in identifying working and
non working components.
Wastage of time to arrange
stationary items, junction boxes and OHP for the
classes.
Wastage of time in collecting the
components from other labs.
No proper component testers available in lab.
Non-availability of required components
in particular lab.
Lockers are not kept near the classrooms.
Stationary, OHP and junction boxes are not
kept in class room.
No arrangement to keep stationary, OHP and
junction boxes safely .
Trainees are not knowing, how to check the components.MATERIAL
SAMARTH
54
No time allocated to
submit records and files.
No information regarding the absence of faculties.
No proper time allocated for the cleaner to clean
the lab.
Allocation of theory classes during lab hours to
the faculties.
No allocation of other faculties to guide the trainees in absence of
particular subject in charge.
No engagement of classes in the
absence of concerned faculties.
Interruptions occurring
during practical session.
Due to power failure.
Wastage of time for submission of
files & records.
Consumption of time for the trainees to get his
doubts cleared for doing the further experiment.
SAMARTHMETHOD
55
VALIDATION OF CAUSES
-MAJOR
-NEGLIGIBLE-MINOR
SAMARTH
56
VALIDATION OF CAUSES
1. Inefficient utilization of working hrs by trainees.2. Wastage of time to arrange junction boxes, stationary items & OHP’s for the classes.3. Trainees are unable to identify whether the existing component testers are in working
condition. 4. No engagement of classes in the absence of concerned faculties.
MAJOR:
MINOR:1. Insufficient time for doing experiments by the trainees.2. Wastage of time collecting the belongings in between the classes.3. No proper outcome in labs due to increases in non-working equipments.4. Consumption of time for the trainees to get his doubts cleared for doing the further
experiment.5. Wastage of time collecting the components from other labs.
NEGLIGIBLE:1. Utilizing the lab hours for completion of the records.2. Trainees are not attending the class on time.3. Required software's for the trainees are not installed in systems.4. Wastage of time to get the belongings in between class hours.5. Consumption of time in identifying the working and non working components.6. Interruption happening during practical session.7. Wastage of time for submission of files & records.
SAMARTH
57
STEP 6
WHY ? WHY ? Analysis
SAMARTH
Root Cause Analysis
58
Inefficient utilization of working hours bytrainees.
In ability to follow right time by trainees.
Variation of time in clocks in our institution.
No proper check up of timings in all the
clocks in our institution .
WHY???
WHY???
WHY???
For 1st major cause SAMARTH
59
Wastage of time to arrange junction boxes stationary items and OHP’s for the class
rooms .
WHY???
OHP’s junction boxes ,stationary items are
not kept in class rooms.
WHY???
No arrangements made to maintain OHP’s
junction boxes and stationary items safely in the class rooms.
For 2nd major cause SAMARTH
60
Trainees are unable to identify whether the existing components testers are in
working condition.
WHY???
No proper maintenance record regarding the testers
available in lab. WHY???
No regular maintenance for the component testers.
For 3rd major cause SAMARTH
61
For 4th Major cause
No engagement of classes in the absence of concerned faculties.
WHY???
No information regarding the absence of faculties .
WHY???
No one is allocated for checking the absence of
faculty.
SAMARTH
62
Data Analysis On Root Cause
STEP 7 SAMARTH
63
SLNO CAUSESVOTES GIVEN BY TRAINEES
VOTES IN PERCENTAGE
1. Inefficient utilization of working hours by trainees. 92 57.86%
2. Wastage of time to arrange junction boxes ,stationary items and OHP’s for the class rooms . 38 23.9%
3. No regular maintenance for the component testers. 21 13.21%
4. No one is allocated for checking the absence of faculty. 8 5.03%
DATA FOR INDIVIDUAL CAUSES: SAMARTH
64
Graphical representation of data
SAMARTH
CAUSES57.86%
23.9%
13.21%5.03%
65
• Theory session
8.00am-10.00am
2.50pm-4.50pm
•Practical session
WORKING SCHEDULE OF CP04 II YEAR TRAINEES
Break10.00am-10.10am
Lunch break12:10pm-12:40pm
Break2:40pm-2:50pm
The same procedure is followed alternately for the other batches of CP04 II year trainees.
Arranging OHP7.55 am- 8.00am
SAMARTH
66
How the time is exactly getting wasted
SAMARTH
67
SAMARTHActivities Actual
Time(min.)UtilizedTime(min.)
Wastage of time(min.)
Allocating OHP
0 5 5
T-Break 10 25 15Lunch break 30 50 20T-Break 10 25 15Allocation of faculties
0 10 10
Identifying components
0 10 10
TOTAL WASTAGE OF TIME :1 Hr. 15mins.
AVERAGE WASTAGE OF TIME PER DAY:
68
SAMARTH
So by this, trainees are wasting 5 min from the first hour of the theory session.
Allocated time for arranging OHP: 7:55am – 8:00am
Utilized time for arranging OHP :7:55am -8.05am
Wastage of time during working hours:
SAMARTH
69
So by this trainees are wasting 15 mins from the 3rd hour of the theory session.
Allocated time for break: 10:00am – 10:10am
Utilized time for break: 10:00am -10.25am
Wastage of time during working hours:
70
SAMARTH
By this trainees are wasting 20min from the next practical session
Allocated time for lunch: 12:10pm -12:40pm
Utilized time for lunch:12:10pm - 1.00pm
Wastage of time during working hours:
SAMARTH
71By this trainees are wasting 15min from the next practical session
Allocated time for break: 2:40pm – 2:50pm
Utilized time for break:2:40pm -3:05pm
Wastage of time during working hours:
72
SAMARTH
By this, its clear that the wastage of time is “1Hr.15 Mins” per day.
73
SAMARTH
“Moments unfold into hours,
Hours unfold into days,
Days unfold into months,
Months unfold into years
& Years unfold into
lifetime”.
“If you waste even a moment you end up wasting a life”
74
So, we decided to solve this wastage of time “1Hr.15Mins”by developing a solution.
SAMARTH
75
STEP 8Development
of
solutions
SAMARTH
76
SAMARTH
Taking initiatives by trainees to set the clock.
Informing Faculties Regarding Classes Through Software
Developing alarm system in our institute.
By Designing centralized timing system in our institute.
LIST OF SOLUTIONS
77
Graphical representation of data SAMARTH
SOLUTIONS
1st solution
2nd solution
3rd solution
4th solution
50.32%23.9%
16.98%
8.8%
78
Samarth Centralized
Timing System
Our Project: SAMARTH
79
SAMARTH
Demonstration of the
project
SAMARTH
80
SAMARTH
ACT PLAN
DOCheck
PDCA cycle:
81
SAMARTHPROCEDURE FOLLOWED FOR THE PROJECT “SCTS”
82
SCTS SAMARTH
83
SAMARTH
Printed circuit board 50RS
chassis 100RS
components 200RS
Total cost estimation 350RS
PROJECT COST ESTIMATION
84
Solving one cause will not solve the problem completely.So we designed the solutions for other causes also as follows..
SAMARTH
85
Cause 2: Wastage of time to arrange junction boxes stationary items and OHP’s for the class rooms .
Equipments Maintenance List
Batch :Date of updating :Signature :(Class Representative)
Equipments Equipment no StatusOHP
Junction Box
For this , we allocated OHP’s , junction boxes,& stationary items to the class rooms permanently, and prepared a maintenance list for that.
SAMARTH
86
Cause 3: Trainees are unable to identify whether the existing component tester are in working condition.
So, We solved this cause by Implementing Maintenance Record of Component Testers
SAMARTH
87
No Engagement of classes in absence of allocated faculties
We solved this cause by preparing a faculties allocation chart
SAMARTHCause4:
88
SAMARTH
Sl.no Activity done Done by days
01 Digital clock Rajesh Abdul 10
02 Allocation charts Geethika Angel 01
03 Check sheet Philemon Monisha
01
04 Development of maintenance records
Angel Darshan 02
05 Data collection all _
Activity plan sheet
89
STEP 9Foreseeing Probable
Resistances
SAMARTH
90
SAMARTH
1.If power fails how the clock works. we provided the backup circuit for the clock.
2.If there is variation in time due to mal-functioning of the clock.
we provided the facility to set the time manually.
3.If the power fails the circuit may consume more power for the backup provided.
we have provided a logic circuit for consuming less power so that it will have a long backup.
Probable Resistances:
91
4.If OHP’s and junction boxes are not working what can be done.
we have provided maintenance report for testing OHP’s and junction boxes every weekend.
5.If trainees are not knowing how to work with the testers.
we have provided guidelines for each component testers to the trainees.
6.If class representative is absent how the work continues.
we have allocated substitute for doing that particular work.
SAMARTH
92
STEP 10 SAMARTH
TRIAL IMPLEMENTATION
93
Progress of trainees Before & after
implementation of “SCTS”
SAMARTH
94
SAMARTH
In efficient utilization of working hours by trainees.
Trainees are utilizing working hours efficiently and effectively.
1.Before implementation After implementationProgress of trainees:
95
SAMARTH
Wastage of time in arranging OHP’s junction boxes and stationary items for classes.
There is no wastage of time in arranging OHP’s junction box and stationary items for the class rooms.
2. Before implementation After implementation
96
SAMARTH
Trainees were unable to identify whether the existing component testers are working condition.
Trainees are sure that the particular component testers are working by seeing the maintenance record.
3.Before implementation After implementation
97
SAMARTH
No engagement of classes in the absence of concerned faculty.
Classes are engaged with the substitution of absence faculty.
4.Before implementation After implementation
98
SAMARTH
2k62k72k82k62k72k8
61.33%
86.12%
67.8% 65%
89.36%
THEORY PRACTICAL
60.46%
Increment internal’s percentage level of CP-04 II year trainees.
99
We achieved our target by improving the average internal’s Percentage level from 63.64% 87.74%
SAMARTH
100
STEP 11
Regular Implementation
SAMARTH
On 30th March 2010
101
TANGIBLE GAINS
Efficient utilization of working hours by trainees.
No wastage of time for arranging OHP’s, Junction box for the class room.
Time is utilized by the trainees with the substitution of absence of faculty.
SAMARTH
102
we improved our thinking power. Increased our communication skills. Increased our Presentation Skills. Developed our team work. Developed leadership quality. Can identify easily the component tester.
INTANGIBLE GAINS SAMARTH
103
STEP 12FOLLOW UP REVIEW
SAMARTH
104
STANDARDIZATION: SAMARTH
Records regarding Samarth Centralized Timing System (SCTS).
Maintenance record for junction boxes, OHP’s.
Implementing check list.
Maintenance record for component tester.
105
SAMARTH 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Analysis of the problem
Cause and effect analysis
Root cause analysis
Data analysis on root cause
Development of solutions
Foreseeing probable resistances
Trial implementation
Regular implementation
Follow up review
Meeting noSteps
MILESTONE CHART
106
SAMARTH
Future problem:
Lack of trouble shooting skills in
trainees
107
SAMARTH QC tools used
Sl.no QC tools01 Pareto chart
02 Check sheet
03 Graphs
04 Cause & Effect diagram
05 Process Decision Program Chart (PDPC)
06 Matrix diagram
108
SAMARTH
THANK YOU
109
Any Quires ???????.
SAMARTH