model selection econometrics

8
80 84 88 92 96 100 104 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 INDUSTRIAL 2. Linear Trend Dependent Variable INDUSTRIAL !et"#d Lea$t S%&are$ Date 02'19'15 Ti(e 1203 Sa(ple 1999!01 2012!01 In)l&ded #b$er*ati#n$ 157 INDUSTRIAL+,-1./,-2. T ,#e i)ient Std rr#r t Stati$ti) r#b ,-1. 90 30333 0 643535 140 3239 0 0000 ,-2. 0 025589 0 007134 3 587005 0 0004 R $%&ared 0 076648 !ean dependent *ar 92 29924 Ad &$ted R $%&ared 0 070691 S D dependent *ar 4 202261 S # re re$$i#n 4 051009 A ai e in # )riteri#n 5 648466 S&( $%&ared re$id 2543 654 S)" ar: )riteri#n 5 687399 L# li eli"##d 441 4046 ;annan <&inn )riter 5 664278 = $tati$ti) 12 86661 D&rbin >at$#n $tat 0 027890 r#b-= $tati$ti). 0 000448

Upload: sumanta1234

Post on 05-Oct-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Model Selection of various AR Processes

TRANSCRIPT

2. Linear Trend

Dependent Variable: INDUSTRIAL

Method: Least Squares

Date: 02/19/15 Time: 12:03

Sample: 1999M01 2012M01

Included observations: 157

INDUSTRIAL=C(1)+C(2)*T

CoefficientStd. Errort-StatisticProb.

C(1)90.303330.643535140.32390.0000

C(2)0.0255890.0071343.5870050.0004

R-squared0.076648Mean dependent var92.29924

Adjusted R-squared0.070691S.D. dependent var4.202261

S.E. of regression4.051009Akaike info criterion5.648466

Sum squared resid2543.654Schwarz criterion5.687399

Log likelihood-441.4046Hannan-Quinn criter.5.664278

F-statistic12.86661Durbin-Watson stat0.027890

Prob(F-statistic)0.000448

Quadratic Trend

Dependent Variable: INDUSTRIAL

Method: Least Squares

Date: 02/19/15 Time: 12:05

Sample: 1999M01 2012M01

Included observations: 157

INDUSTRIAL= C(1)+ C(2)*T+C(3)*T2

CoefficientStd. Errort-StatisticProb.

C(1)86.833190.88349298.284020.0000

C(2)0.1599170.0261696.1109810.0000

C(3)-0.0008610.000162-5.3036010.0000

R-squared0.219252Mean dependent var92.29924

Adjusted R-squared0.209112S.D. dependent var4.202261

S.E. of regression3.737149Akaike info criterion5.493447

Sum squared resid2150.808Schwarz criterion5.551846

Log likelihood-428.2356Hannan-Quinn criter.5.517165

F-statistic21.62336Durbin-Watson stat0.033174

Prob(F-statistic)0.000000

Exponential Trend

Dependent Variable: INDUSTRIAL

Method: Least Squares

Date: 02/19/15 Time: 12:06

Sample: 1999M01 2012M01

Included observations: 157

Convergence achieved after 7 iterations

INDUSTRIAL= C(1)*EXP(C(2)*T)

CoefficientStd. Errort-StatisticProb.

C(1)90.347550.637150141.79950.0000

C(2)0.0002737.73E-053.5300570.0005

R-squared0.075487Mean dependent var92.29924

Adjusted R-squared0.069522S.D. dependent var4.202261

S.E. of regression4.053554Akaike info criterion5.649722

Sum squared resid2546.852Schwarz criterion5.688655

Log likelihood-441.5032Hannan-Quinn criter.5.665534

Durbin-Watson stat0.027857

SummarySIC CriteriaAIC CriteriaR squared

Linear5.6873995.6484660.076648

Quadratic5.5518465.4934470.219252

Exponential5.6886555.6497220.075487

Model selection of Question 2Based on SIC Criteria SelectQuadratic TrendBased on AIC Criteria SelectQuadratic TrendBased on R Squared SelectQuadratic Trend

3. Exponential Trend with AR(1)

Dependent Variable: INDUSTRIAL

Method: Least Squares

Date: 02/19/15 Time: 12:45

Sample (adjusted): 1999M02 2012M01

Included observations: 156 after adjustments

Convergence achieved after 6 iterations

INDUSTRIAL=C(1)*(EXP(C(2)*T))+C(3)*INDUSTRIAL(-1)

CoefficientStd. Errort-StatisticProb.

C(1)1.5370711.2171581.2628360.2086

C(2)-5.64E-050.000830-0.0679470.9459

C(3)0.9840530.01342773.289770.0000

R-squared0.974282Mean dependent var92.33489

Adjusted R-squared0.973945S.D. dependent var4.191897

S.E. of regression0.676633Akaike info criterion2.075667

Sum squared resid70.04825Schwarz criterion2.134318

Log likelihood-158.9020Hannan-Quinn criter.2.099488

Durbin-Watson stat1.465829

Quadratic Equation with AR(1)

Dependent Variable: INDUSTRIAL

Method: Least Squares

Date: 02/19/15 Time: 12:48

Sample (adjusted): 1999M02 2012M01

Included observations: 156 after adjustments

Convergence achieved after 12 iterations

VariableCoefficientStd. Errort-StatisticProb.

C230.9885544.89070.4239170.6722

T-1.1836143.377477-0.3504430.7265

T20.0032690.0068130.4797720.6321

AR(1)0.9899990.01468367.422660.0000

R-squared0.974450Mean dependent var92.33489

Adjusted R-squared0.973946S.D. dependent var4.191897

S.E. of regression0.676631Akaike info criterion2.081925

Sum squared resid69.59007Schwarz criterion2.160126

Log likelihood-158.3902Hannan-Quinn criter.2.113687

F-statistic1932.357Durbin-Watson stat1.484230

Prob(F-statistic)0.000000

Inverted AR Roots.99

Linear Model with AR(1)

Dependent Variable: INDUSTRIAL

Method: Least Squares

Date: 02/19/15 Time: 12:53

Sample (adjusted): 1999M02 2012M01

Included observations: 156 after adjustments

Convergence achieved after 4 iterations

VariableCoefficientStd. Errort-StatisticProb.

C96.6943113.103777.3791230.0000

T-0.0052400.079623-0.0658150.9476

AR(1)0.9840440.01342373.310010.0000

R-squared0.974282Mean dependent var92.33489

Adjusted R-squared0.973945S.D. dependent var4.191897

S.E. of regression0.676633Akaike info criterion2.075668

Sum squared resid70.04832Schwarz criterion2.134319

Log likelihood-158.9021Hannan-Quinn criter.2.099489

F-statistic2898.018Durbin-Watson stat1.465814

Prob(F-statistic)0.000000

Inverted AR Roots.98

Model selection of Question 3Based on BIC Criteria, we choose exponential trend ( . Though BIC criteria is almost same with Linear Model.