modeling isotope fraction during primary cracking of natural gas
TRANSCRIPT
8/8/2019 Modeling Isotope Fraction During Primary Cracking of Natural Gas
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/modeling-isotope-fraction-during-primary-cracking-of-natural-gas 1/16
Ž .Chemical Geology 149 1998 235–250
Modelling isotope fractionation during primary cracking of natural gas: a reaction kinetic approach
Bernhard Cramer ),1, Bernhard M. Krooss, Ralf Littke 2
( ) Institute of Petroleum and Organic Geochemistry ICG-4 ; Research Centre Julich, 52425 Julich, Germany¨ ¨
Received 15 April 1997; accepted 3 April 1998
Abstract
Ž .A numerical model has been developed to compute stable carbon isotope variations in natural gas methane by
calculating13
CH and12
CH generation as a set of parallel first-order reactions of primary cracking. The goal of this work 4 4
was to combine the description of isotope fractionation with established kinetic models for gas generation. Stable carbon
isotope ratios of methane from sedimentary organic matter are characterized by the initial carbon isotope ratio of methane
precursors within the organic matter and by a constant difference in activation energy between12
C- and13
C-methane
generation from corresponding precursor sites. Methane generation is calculated separately for12
C- and13
C-methane. A
difference in activation energy automatically implies a temperature dependence of fractionation processes which has not
been taken into consideration in previous works. This new model offers a theoretical explanation and mathematical
description of the observed variability of d 13
C-values of methane during open-system pyrolysis experiments. Carbon
isotopes of methane within natural gas of thermogenic origin can be simulated for any geological temperature history. The
application of the method to two coaly rock samples of the Pokur formation from northern West Siberia results in simulatedcarbon isotope values of methane which are very similar to those in the natural gas within the reservoirs of the Pokur
Ž 13 .formation d C sy42‰ to y54‰ . This finding supports a thermogenic origin of the gas at an early stage of 1
maturation. q 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Methane; Natural gas; Isotope fractionation; Reaction kinetics; West Siberia; Pokur formation
1. Introduction
Stable isotopes of natural gas components have
been used to identify source rocks and to recognize
)
Corresponding author.1
Current address: Federal Institute for Geosciences and NaturalŽ .Resources BGR , Stilleweg 2, 30655 Hannover, Germany. E-mail:
Current address: Institute of Geology and Geochemistry of
Petroleum and Coal, Aachen University of Technology, Lochner-
str. 4-20, 52056 Aachen, Germany.
Ž .possible secondary alterations of the gas. Stahl 1968Ž .and Stahl and Carey 1975 established first empiri-
cal relationships between the maturity of source rocks
and the stable carbon isotope composition of relatedgaseous hydrocarbons. Since these early milestones a
variety of such empirical relationships has been de-
veloped serving as important tools to solve appliedŽgeological problems Faber, 1987; Berner and Faber,
.1988; Shen et al., 1988; Berner, 1989 . However,
these models have severe limitations, because they
are not based on a fundamental understanding of
0009-2541r98r$19.00 q 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.Ž .PII S 0 0 0 9 - 2 5 4 1 9 8 0 0 0 4 2 - 4
8/8/2019 Modeling Isotope Fraction During Primary Cracking of Natural Gas
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/modeling-isotope-fraction-during-primary-cracking-of-natural-gas 2/16
( ) B. Cramer et al.r Chemical Geology 149 1998 235–250236
what controls isotopic fractionation and are therefore
not generally applicable to all types of sedimentary
basins, source rocks, and thermal histories.
Recent developments both with respect to the
kinetics of hydrocarbon gas generation and the de-
scription of isotopic fractionation processes provide
the basis for a gradual replacement of the empirical
approach by a more mechanistic one.
The application of chemical reaction kinetics toŽ .oil and gas formation Tissot and Espitalie, 1975´
has resulted in new prediction tools which are now
widely applied in basin modelling. Extensive experi-
mental studies on hydrocarbon generation by Juntgen¨Žand co-workers e.g., van Heek and Juntgen, 1968;¨
.Hanbaba and Juntgen, 1969 and other groups have¨provided the initial database which has since then
been extended continuously. One of the main results
of these studies was that, in order to arrive at realis-
tic extrapolations to geologic heating rates, the de-scription of gas generation must involve a set of
Ž .parallel reactions ‘reaction complex’ with an acti-Žvation energy distribution Juntgen and van Heek,¨
.1970; Braun and Burnham, 1987 . The experience
from kinetic modelling of hydrocarbon generation
has so far found only relatively little application in
the investigation of the associated isotope fractiona-
tion processes.ŽSeveral authors Galimov, 1988; Clayton, 1991;
.Berner et al., 1992, 1995; Rooney et al., 1995 used
Ž .Rayleigh distillation formulae Rayleigh, 1896 tocompute isotopic fractionation processes of natural
gas components. Isotope partitioning between reac-
tant and reaction product as a function of the extentŽ .of gas generation transformation ratio and initial
isotope ratio of the precursor material was simulated
using a fractionation coefficient termed kinetic iso-Ž .tope effect KIE . The kinetic isotope effect KIE is
defined as ratio of the reaction rate coefficients of Ž 12 .the isotopically light k and the isotopically heavyC
Ž 13 .compound k :C
k 12
CKIE s . 1Ž .13
k C
Ž .Galimov 1974 showed that the KIE concept
applied to generation of hydrocarbon gases from a
set of parallel reactions predicts significantly differ-
ent isotope ratios than for a single generation reac-
tion. In consequence he combined a model of
methane generation from a set of parallel first-orderŽreactions with Rayleigh isotope fractionation Gali-
.mov, 1988 . Here, the generation of hydrocarbonsŽ .was simulated based on temperature-dependent
chemical reaction kinetics, but the temperature de-Žpendence of the isotope fractionation itself as re-
ported from laboratory experiments for example, byŽ . Ž ..Galimov et al. 1972 and Sackett 1978 was not
taken into consideration.
Rate coefficients of chemical reactions are usually
strongly temperature-dependent. If k 12
and k 13
haveC C
even slightly different temperature dependences,Ž .then, according to Eq. 1 the KIE will also be
temperature-dependent. Based on experimental evi-
dence from non-isothermal open system pyrolysis we
present a conceptual model which explicitly takes
into account the temperature dependence of the KIE.
In this context it was our main objective to combine
the reaction kinetic fractionation concept for a set of Ž .parallel first-order reactions Galimov, 1974, 1988
Ž .with the idea of Berner et al. 1995 to predict
isotope composition of natural gas components from
laboratory pyrolysis experiments.
The second objective of this work was to test the
hypothesis on thermogenic generation of methane
during early source maturation in northern West
Siberia. Immature organic matter from the Lower
Cretaceous Pokur formation in which the giant gas
accumulations of northern West Siberia are concen-
trated was used for the pyrolytic studies and thecombined isotope measurements.
2. Samples and experimental
2.1. Rock samples
Nine source rock samples from the Pokur forma-
tion in northern West Siberia were selected for the
evaluation of kinetic parameters for methane genera-Ž .
tion Schaefer et al., 1998, in press . For pyrolysisexperiments combined with isotope studies, two of
these nine samples were chosen. The samples se-
lected for this study were cored in borehole 105 in
the gas field Yuzhno Russkoe approximately 150 km
east of the Urengoy gas field which contains theŽlargest known accumulation of gas on earth Grace
.and Hart, 1990 . The 1000-m thick Pokur formation
8/8/2019 Modeling Isotope Fraction During Primary Cracking of Natural Gas
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/modeling-isotope-fraction-during-primary-cracking-of-natural-gas 3/16
( ) B. Cramer et al.r Chemical Geology 149 1998 235–250 237
Table 1
Organic geochemical characteristics of the pyrolysed rock samples
of the Pokur formation
Sample Pk1 Pk2
Ž .Depth m 1250 1450Ž .TOC % 41 63
Ž .VR % 0.51 0.52
Ž .S1 mg HCrg 2.2 18.1Ž .S2 mg HCrg 54.6 130.2Ž .S3 mg CO rg 17.0 12.12
Ž .T 8C 422 426max
Ž Ž ..PI S1r S2qS3 0.04 0.12Ž .HI mg HCrgTOC 134 207Ž .OI mg CO rgTOC 42 192
13 Ž .Initiald C ‰ y24.1 y23.3OM13 Ž .Final d C ‰ y23.8 y23.1OM
was deposited from Upper Aptian to Cenomanian
times and predominantly consists of sandstones with
coaly organic matter. The two rock samples repre-sent the Cenomanian section of the Pokur formation
Ž .with one sample from the top of the formation Pk1Ž .and the other Pk2 from a section 200 m deeper.
General organic geochemical characteristics of the
organic matter are summarized in Table 1. Accord-Ž . Žing to the concentration of organic carbon TOC 41
.and 63 wt.% the rock samples can be described as
coaly sandstones or sandy coals. Vitrinite reflectance
and T -values clearly indicate that the organic mat-max
Ž .ter of these rocks is immature Table 1 . Hydrogen
Ž .indices HI of 134 and 207 mg HCrgTOC aretypical of humic organic matter in coals at low levels
Ž .of maturation Tissot and Welte, 1984 .
2.2. Pyrolysis experiments
A 200 mg rock sample was pyrolysed using the
open-system pyrolysis apparatus previously de-Ž .scribed by Krooss et al. 1995 . Open-system pyroly-
sis allows the continuous registration of hydrocarbon
formation rates as a function of temperature that
constitute the most common data base for kinetic
modelling of non-isothermal simulation experimentsŽ .Schenk et al., 1997 . Although even under open-sys-
tem conditions a certain overlap of primary gas
generation with secondary cracking of high molecu-
lar weight primary petroleum compounds cannot be
avoided, this method provides probably the closest
approach to primary cracking reactions.
Special tests were performed to control the ovenŽtemperature during the experiments Schaefer et al.,
.1998, in press . Samples were heated from 208C up
to 8008C each at heating rates of 0.1, 0.3 and 2.0 K
miny1. About 40 ml miny1 helium were flushed
through the reactor as carrier gas. Gaseous hydrocar-Ž .bons were separated by gas chromatography GC
Ž .and quantified by a flame ionisation detector FID .
These measurements were carried out every 3 min
during each pyrolysis experiment. More details about
the analytical procedure are found in Schaefer et al.Ž .1998, in press . The evaluation of the experimental
data was performed according to the scheme de-Ž .scribed by Schaefer et al. 1990 and yielded an
activation energy distribution and one common pre-
exponential factor for the entire set of parallel reac-
tions.
For isotope analyses, gas samples were taken
off-line from experiments performed at a heating rateof 2.0 K miny1. During time intervals when no
GC-measurements were made gaseous pyrolysis
products together with helium were flushed throughŽ .a glass sampling container 250 ml equipped with
two stopcocks. After 20 min the flask was closed and
the gas was expanded into an evacuated 70 ml
stainless steel container. For every sample a new
glass flask was installed. For carbon isotope analysis
the gas was injected from the container into a GC
interfaced to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer.
Measurements were carried out using the method of continuous flow.
3. Experimental results
3.1. Methane generation
Characteristics of methane generation during py-
rolysis experiments from the two rock samples were
very similar. As a result, the activation energy distri-butions and pre-exponential factors differ onlyŽ .slightly Fig. 1 . The total methane generation poten-
tial of approximately 29 mgrgTOC determined for
the two samples corresponds to 22% of the total
hydrocarbon generation potential measured by
Rock–Eval pyrolysis for sample Pk1 and to 14% forŽ .sample Pk2 Table 1 . Methane generation is de-
8/8/2019 Modeling Isotope Fraction During Primary Cracking of Natural Gas
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/modeling-isotope-fraction-during-primary-cracking-of-natural-gas 4/16
( ) B. Cramer et al.r Chemical Geology 149 1998 235–250238
Fig. 1. Reaction kinetic parameters for methane generation from rocks of the Pokur formation evaluated by the gross kinetic model of Ž .Schaefer et al. 1990 .
scribed by 39 parallel reactions for sample Pk1 andŽ .42 reactions for Pk2 Fig. 1 . The highest methane
generation potentials were calculated for activation
energies of 243 kJ moly1
for Pk1 and 247 kJ moly1
for Pk2 at pre-exponential factors of 9.06P1013 sy1
Ž . 13 y1 Ž .Pk1 and 3.20P10 s Pk2 . Both activation
energy distributions show a nearly symmetrical ap-y1 y1 Žpearance from 167 kJ mol to 352 kJ mol Fig.
.1 .
Methane generation during both pyrolysis experi-
ments started at 3008C, reached a maximum genera-Ž .tion at 4908C, and ceased at 8008C Fig. 2 . Mod-
elled methane generation for a geological heating
rate of 2 K Myry1 results in small differences
between both samples. As shown in Fig. 2 modelled
methane generation starts at about 708C. Generally,
the generation curve of sample Pk1 is shifted by 5 K
to higher temperatures in comparison to Pk2. Maxi-
mum methane generation rate from Pk1 occurs at
1878C and from Pk2 at 1818C. Under these condi-
tions, the potential for methane generation of bothŽ .rocks is exhausted at 4008C Fig. 2 .
3.2. Stable carbon isotope Õalues
The stable carbon isotope composition of methane
during pyrolysis experiments is summarized in Table2. Because of the fast volume exchange in the glass
flask with a rate of about 20%rmin the measured
d 13
C-values mainly represent the highest temperatureŽof the respective sampled temperature interval Table
.2 . The comparatively low reproducibility of the13 Žd C-measurements with 1s ranges between 0.5
.and 1.25‰, Table 2 is regarded as a result of low
methane concentrations in the carrier gas collected
during the pyrolysis experiments.
Measured carbon isotope ratios of methane from
both rock samples display similar trends. These mea-
sured d 13
C-values of methane as a function of tem-
perature and extent of methane generation are com-Ž .pared with those of Berner et al. 1995 for methane
pyrolytically generated from xylite and kukersite in
Fig. 3. Interestingly, neither their results nor our
results show a steady increase in carbon isotopeŽ .values over the entire temperature range Fig. 3A .
8/8/2019 Modeling Isotope Fraction During Primary Cracking of Natural Gas
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/modeling-isotope-fraction-during-primary-cracking-of-natural-gas 5/16
( ) B. Cramer et al.r Chemical Geology 149 1998 235–250 239
Ž y1 . Ž y1 .Fig. 2. Methane generation rates for the laboratory experiment 2 K min and a geological heating rate 2 K Myr as a function of
temperature calculated from kinetic parameters for the two rock samples of the Pokur formation.
Our experiments resulted in increasing d 13
C-values
with increasing temperature only for limited temper-
ature ranges, whereas within two temperature inter-
Table 2
Carbon isotope values of methane generated during pyrolysis
experiments at a heating rate of 2 K miny1 , reproducibility of
d 13
C measurements given as 1s range13 13
Temperature c-Pk1 d CH -Pk1 c-Pk2 d CH -Pk24 4
Ž . Ž . Ž .8C ‰ ‰
260 –300 0.001 y50.0"1.25 0.001 y53.5"1.25
300 –340 0.006 y43.0"1.25 0.005 y41.9"1.0
340 –380 0.027 y39.5"1.25 0.023 y38.2"1.0
380 –420 0.097 y40.1"0.75 0.087 y39.0"0.50
420 –460 0.256 y37.4"0.50 0.239 y37.6"0.50
460 –500 0.468 y33.0"0.50 0.454 y33.8"0.50
500 –540 0.664 y31.2"0.50 0.658 y31.0"0.50540 –580 0.812 y29.5"0.50 0.816 y28.7"0.50
580 –620 0.902 y25.3"0.50 0.911 y25.6"0.50
620 –660 0.950 y27.3"0.75 0.959 y29.0"0.75
660 –700 0.978 y31.7"0.75 0.982 y29.9"0.75
700 –740 0.992 y29.7"1.0 0.993 y33.2"0.75
740 –780 0.998 y26.5"1.0 0.998 y31.1"1.0
c denotes the realized methane potential.
vals decreasing13
C y concentrations were observed.
Starting with d 13
C-values below y50‰ at 3008C
and a degree of conversion of less than 1% of the
Ž .methane generation potential Fig. 3B , methane fromPk1 and Pk2 became isotopically heavier to valuesŽ . Ž .of about y39.5‰ Pk1 and y38.2‰ Pk2 at
Ž . 133808C Fig. 3A . At 4208C a slight decrease of d C
of methane was observed for both samples. From
460 to 6208C d 13
C-values increased with increasing
temperature up to values of y25.3‰ for Pk1 andŽ .y25.6‰ for Pk2 Fig. 3A . At this temperature
Ž .about 90% of the methane was generated Fig. 3B .
During generation of the last 10% of methane, car-
bon isotope ratios decreased to values of y31.7‰Ž . Ž .Pk1 and y29.9‰ Pk2 . The last measured isotope
values above 99% methane generated again showed
slightly higher values.Ž .Berner et al. 1995 measured carbon isotope
values of methane generated during open-system py-
rolysis with a heating rate of 5 K miny1 from a
xylite representing terrestrial organic matter and from
an algae-derived kukersite. Due to the different heat-
8/8/2019 Modeling Isotope Fraction During Primary Cracking of Natural Gas
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/modeling-isotope-fraction-during-primary-cracking-of-natural-gas 6/16
8/8/2019 Modeling Isotope Fraction During Primary Cracking of Natural Gas
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/modeling-isotope-fraction-during-primary-cracking-of-natural-gas 7/16
8/8/2019 Modeling Isotope Fraction During Primary Cracking of Natural Gas
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/modeling-isotope-fraction-during-primary-cracking-of-natural-gas 8/16
( ) B. Cramer et al.r Chemical Geology 149 1998 235–250242
The ratio of the pre-exponential factors denotesŽ .the minimum kinetic isotope effect for the limit of
high temperatures. The rate of decrease in isotope
fractionation with increasing temperature depends onŽ .the difference in activation energies D E of thea
two isotopic product species.
Although this temperature dependence may not
hold for all types of kinetic isotope effects theoreti-
cal calculations show that most reactions involving
stable carbon isotopes can be described with suffi-Žcient precision using this approach Huang et al.,
.1968; Vogel and Stern, 1971 . In the present work
the ratio A r A was assumed to be equal to 1 in12 13C C
accordance with results by Wolfsberg and SternŽ .1964 for secondary kinetic isotope effects. This
assumption implies that isotope fractionation van-
ishes at high reaction temperatures.
Fig. 4 shows the temperature dependence of the
kinetic isotope effect for a single first-order reactionŽ .and different D E -values according to Eq. 4 . Witha
increasing difference in activation energy, both the
absolute value of the KIE and its temperature depen-
dence increase. The strongest isotope fractionation
will occur at low temperatures of gas generation in
geological systems. During pyrolysis experiments the
temperature dependence can be observed over a wide
temperature range, but the change of KIE with tem-
perature is much weaker than under geological con-
ditions. Therefore, if an isotope effect determined
from pyrolysis experiments is assumed to be temper-
ature-independent conversion of the reaction to geo-
logical heating rate would probably result in incor-
rect interpretations.
4.3. Justification of the model
Ž .The isotope fractionation during hydrocarbon gas
generation is attributed to small differences in the
reaction rate coefficients for the different isotopeŽ .species which, according to Eq. 4 reflect differ-
ences in the activation energies of the formation
reactions. The properties of molecules differing onlyby isotopic substitution are qualitatively the same but
Ž .quantitatively different Hoefs, 1996 . It can be
shown that, as a result of quantum mechanical ef-
fects, different isotope species in a given chemical
Fig. 4. Kinetic isotope effect defined by a difference in activation energy D E as a function of temperature.a
8/8/2019 Modeling Isotope Fraction During Primary Cracking of Natural Gas
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/modeling-isotope-fraction-during-primary-cracking-of-natural-gas 9/16
( ) B. Cramer et al.r Chemical Geology 149 1998 235–250 243
Žbond will have different zero-point energies cf..Hoefs, 1996 and that, due to an inverse relationship
between vibrational frequency and molecular mass
of bonded atoms, a chemical bond involving a heav-
ier isotope species will have a lower zero-point
energy than the same bond with the light isotope.
The slight difference in bond energy is considered to
influence reaction kinetics by affecting the thermal
cleavage of the covalent bonds which represents the
rate-determining reaction in kerogen transformation
and hydrocarbon generation processes. This reason-
ing provides the justification for attributing a differ-
ence in activation energies to the formation reactions
of different isotope species. The qualitative and to
some extent speculative character of this approach is
recognized and should be kept in mind. However, it
represents, in our opinion, a useful and necessary
step from predominantly empirical relationships to-
wards mechanistic models.
4.4. Kinetic equations for parallel reactions
As pointed out above, a description of hydrocar-
bon generation kinetics by one single reaction yields
unrealistic temperature predictions for hydrocarbon
generation on the geologic time scale. Therefore, theŽ .thermal generation of hydrocarbons methane from
sedimentary organic matter is represented by a set of
n first-order reactions with discrete activation ener-
gies and initial generation potentials f 0
. For non-iso-i
Žthermal systems e.g., geologic systems, non-isother-. Ž .mal pyrolysis the temperature T and, accordingly,
Ž .the rate coefficient k are functions of timei
Ž Ž Ž ... Ž .k T t . The reaction rate r for reaction i ati i
time t is given by:
d c d f i ir t s s y s k T t P f i s 1 . . . nŽ . Ž . Ž .Ž .i i id t d t
6Ž .
with
c t s f 0 y f t 7Ž . Ž . Ž .i i i
Here, c denotes the amount of reaction product ati
time t and f is the residual generation potential,i
which can be obtained by integration according to:
t 0 f t s f exp y k T t d t 8Ž . Ž . Ž .Ž .Hi i iž /
0
so that
d c t i 0r t s s k T t f exp y k T t d t Ž . Ž . Ž .Ž . Ž .Hi i i iž /d t 0
9Ž .
The total residual generation potential for all n
parallel reactions at time t is given by the sumn
f t s f t 10Ž . Ž . Ž .Ý i
is1
and, correspondingly, the total amount of reaction
product is:
n
c t s c t 11Ž . Ž . Ž .Ý i
is1
The overall generation rate at time t is
n
r t s r t 12Ž . Ž . Ž .Ý iis1
4.5. Isotope fractionation
The computation of the isotope fractionation ef-Ž .fects is performed in terms of isotope ratios R . For
each of the parallel reactions the isotope ratio of
product precursor sites in the organic matter is de-
fined as:
f 013i C
0 R s 13Ž .i 012 f i C
Correspondingly, the precursor isotope composition
for all reactions is given by:
n
013 f Ý i C
is10 R s 14Ž .n
012 f Ý i C
is1
This value is not necessarily identical with theŽ 0 .
initial bulk isotope ratio of the organic matter R .OMIt is determined from the cumulative product isotope
composition after complete conversion. For sedimen-
tary organic matter an isotopic homogeneity of
methane precursor sites cannot be presumed. Never-
theless, we presently see no possibility to attribute a
specific initial isotope ratio to each of the n parallelŽ .first-order pseudo reactions. Therefore, the precur-
8/8/2019 Modeling Isotope Fraction During Primary Cracking of Natural Gas
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/modeling-isotope-fraction-during-primary-cracking-of-natural-gas 10/16
( ) B. Cramer et al.r Chemical Geology 149 1998 235–250244
sor sites of all parallel reactions are assumed to have
the same initial isotope composition:
R0 s R0 i s 1 . . . n 15Ž . Ž .i
The input data for the isotope fractionation model
are the kinetic parameters for gas generation ob-
tained from the non-isothermal pyrolysis experi-
Žments number of parallel reactions, total generationpotential; activation energy distribution, pre-ex-
.ponential factor; cf. Figs. 1 and 2 and the isotope
composition of the gas sampled at different stages of
the pyrolysis experiment. The activation energy dis-
tribution from this procedure is assumed to representŽ12 .the predominant isotope species C . Based on the
activation energy distribution and the precursor iso-Ž 0 .topic composition R generation potentials for the
isotopically light and the isotopically heavy species
are determined for each individual reaction:
f 0
f 0
P R0
i i i0 012 13 f s ; f s i s 1 . . . n 16Ž . Ž .i C i C0 01 q R 1 q Ri i
These generation potentials are used to compute
the residual generation potentials, the amount of
product generated and the generation rate for the two
isotope species as a function of timertemperature for
each individual reaction. The generation rates of 12
C13 Ž .and C species e.g., methane , respectively, from
reaction i at time t are:
d c 12i C 012 12 1 2r t s s k T t f Ž . Ž .Ž .i C i C i C
d t
=t
12exp y k T t d t Ž .Ž .H i Cž /0
17aŽ .
d c 13i C 013 13 1 3r t s s k T t f Ž . Ž .Ž .i C i C i C
d t
=t
13exp y k T t d t Ž .Ž .H i Cž /0
17bŽ .
From the two reaction rates the ‘instantaneous’
isotope composition of the product at time t can becomputed:
n
13r t Ž .Ý i C
is1 R t s 18Ž . Ž .ninst
13r t Ž .Ý i C
is1
The cumulative isotopic product composition at
time t and the isotopic composition of the residual
precursor sites can be calculated in a similar way.
The differences in reaction rates of the isotope
species and, in consequence, in the product and
residual isotope ratios arise from the difference inŽ .activation energies D E . To simplify the calcula-a
tion procedure we assumed identical D E for all na
Žreactions constant offset of the activation energy of 13 .C generation to higher values . This model parame-
ter is varied to match the measured and calculated
‘instantaneous’ isotope ratios determined in the py-
rolysis experiments.The conversion of carbon isotope
ratios to the usual d -notation is performed with the
carbon isotope standard ratio R referenced to PDBstd
standard:
Rd ‰ s y 1 1000 19Ž . Ž .
ž / Rstd
This set of equations models the time- and tem-
perature-dependent isotope distribution between or-Ž .ganic source material and hydrocarbon gas methane
generated from the organic matter. The method
avoids the isotope fractionation concept of a temper-
ature-independent isotope effect.
This procedure also allows extrapolation of mea-
sured isotope values of methane generated pyrolyti-
cally in laboratory experiments to geological temper-
ature histories. Thus, carbon isotope values of
methane only depend on time and temperature, theinitial isotope ratio of methane generating reaction
sites, and on the difference in activation energy
between12
C- and13
C-methane generation.
4.6. Determination of model parameters
Non-isothermal pyrolysis experiments were per-
formed with the Pokur samples at three different
heating rates to evaluate the kinetic parameters of
methane generation. According to the gross kineticŽ .
model of Schaefer et al. 1990 , a set of n parallelreactions with different activation energies was as-
sumed. This procedure yielded the distribution of
activation energies and the pre-exponential factor for
methane generation. The kinetic parameters were
used to compute the generation of methane during
the separate laboratory experiments conducted for
the carbon isotope measurements.
8/8/2019 Modeling Isotope Fraction During Primary Cracking of Natural Gas
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/modeling-isotope-fraction-during-primary-cracking-of-natural-gas 11/16
( ) B. Cramer et al.r Chemical Geology 149 1998 235–250 245
Each of the n methane generating reactions was
attributed a generation potential with the same initial
carbon isotope ratio. This carbon isotope ratioŽ .y33.2‰ was derived from the total methane quan-
tity and the isotope ratios of methane measured in
the experiments. The isotope fractionation model
was matched to the measured carbon isotope values
of methane by varying the difference in activation
energy between12
C- and13
C-methane generation
until the square of the difference between model and
measured values had reached its minimum. The ac-
tual computations were performed in a spreadsheet
using a discretized time-temperature history com-
posed of sufficiently small isothermal time steps. To
relate the stable carbon isotope ratio of methane to
the maturation of organic matter an EASY%Ro ele-Ž .ment Sweeney and Burnham, 1990 was integrated
into the program.
5. Results of the modelling of isotope fractionation
The carbon isotope ratios of methane calculated
with the new model are shown in Fig. 5. In principle
all trends of carbon isotope ratios of methane from
pyrolysis experiments, increasing and decreasing
d 13
C-values, are reproduced by the model. Especially
the temperature interval of main methane generation
Ž .between 400 and 6008C Fig. 2 shows good concur-rence of measured and predicted value. Generally,
only the measured minimum and maximum valuesŽ .are not matched Fig. 5 . The modelled trends shown
in Fig. 5 were obtained with almost identical D E -a
values of y103 J moly1 for Pk1 and y102 J moly1
for Pk2. The D E y values are in the same range asa
the differences in zero-point energies between C–C
bonds in isotopically substituted and non-substitutedŽorganic molecules D E between y80 and y250 Jzp
y1 .mol modelled with ab initio quantum chemistryŽ .calculations by Tang and Jenden 1995 . Once again
it should be emphasized that the isotope trends from
pyrolysis experiments were fitted with one common
D E -value for all parallel reactions. The D E con-a a
cept was introduced to account for the differences in
bond strength between12
C–12
C and12
C–13
C bonds
of precursor structures. Although one could argue
that the D E value may not be the same for alla
reactions, a definition and computation of individual
D E values for each reaction is not justified with thea
present database. Such an approach would corre-
spond to a gross over-interpretation of the existing
database.
The modelled D E -values for methane generationa
from rocks of the Pokur formation correspond to
KIE’s between 1.013 and 1.023 for temperatures of Ž .laboratory pyrolysis Fig. 4 and 1.020 and 1.038 for
the temperature range of methane generation at geo-Ž .logical heating rates Fig. 4 .
No realistic results were achieved when applying
the measured carbon isotope ratios of total organicŽ . 13
carbon Table 1 as initial d C-values of methane
precursors. Generally, the slope of the modelledŽ .carbon isotope trend of methane Fig. 5 is deter-
mined by the difference in activation energy. A
parallel shift of the general trend to isotopically
lighter or heavier methane can be realized by chang-ing the initial carbon isotope ratios of the methane
Ž .precursors as shown by Clayton 1991 . The devia-
tions of isotope trends during methane generation
from monotonously increasing isotope ratios must be
seen as a pure result of the dynamics of methane
generation. At the beginning of methane generation
only some reactions of the whole set are involved in
generation processes. At these hypothetical reaction
sites initial carbon isotope fractionation leads to min-
imum carbon isotope ratios of methane. During our
pyrolysis experiments this stage was reached at tem-Ž .peratures of about 3008C Fig. 5 where less than 1%Ž .of total methane was generated Fig. 3 . With in-
creasing temperature the number of participating re-
actions increases. The measured average isotope
composition of methane during this main stage of
generation can be described as a mixture of gener-
ated methane from a maximum number of active
reaction sites. A more or less steady increase of d 13
C
of methane must be expected and actually is ob-
served. In our pyrolysis experiments this stage wasŽ .reached between 400 and 6008C Fig. 5 . At 5008C
the steady isotope trend of both experiments showsŽ .an inflexion Fig. 5 , indicating that the number of
reactions contributing to isotope fractionation de-
creases and methane generation rates have reachedŽ .maximum values Fig. 2 . The maximum values of
carbon isotope ratios at 380 and 6208C also coincide
fairly well with the inflexion of methane generation
8/8/2019 Modeling Isotope Fraction During Primary Cracking of Natural Gas
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/modeling-isotope-fraction-during-primary-cracking-of-natural-gas 12/16
( ) B. Cramer et al.r Chemical Geology 149 1998 235–250246
Fig. 5. Measured and calculated carbon isotope ratios of methane generated during dry open-system pyrolysis experiments from rock
samples of the Pokur formation.
Ž .rate vs. temperature Figs. 2 and 5 . Towards the end
of methane generation the number of contributing
reactions decreases and the remaining reaction sites
are almost exhausted in12
C methane. They produce
an isotopically heavy ‘rest’ of methane. Thus, thestable carbon isotope ratio during the main phase of
methane generation obviously reflects the generation
dynamics.Ž .Berner et al. 1995 modelled carbon isotope ra-
tios of methane, ethane, and propane generated dur-
ing open-system pyrolysis experiments using
Rayleigh equations with constant KIE’s. They were
not able to describe deviations from monotonously
increasing d 13
C-values. They presumed that different
groups of methane generating reactions are involved
in gas generation. A first group producing isotopi-
cally heavier gas would be continuously over-
whelmed by isotopically lighter gas from a secondŽ .group of reactions Fig. 3A .
We also modelled our data set with RayleighŽ .equations, but in contrast to Berner et al. 1995 and
Žother authors Clayton, 1991; Berner et al., 1992;.Rooney et al., 1995 we applied Rayleigh fractiona-
tion with a temperature-independent kinetic isotope
effect to a set of methane generating reactions asŽ . Ž .defined in Eqs. 6 – 12 and as suggested by Gal-
Ž .imov 1974, 1988 . By this approach the general
trend of stable carbon isotope variations of methanefrom open-system pyrolysis experiments was mod-
elled successfully. This finding supports our general
conclusion on the influence of generation dynamics
on isotope distribution. With a temperature-indepen-
dent KIE the slope of the isotope trend was not
matched and the conversion to geological tempera-
ture histories led to unrealistic results. The applica-
tion of a temperature-dependent KIE as defined inŽ .Eq. 4 to Rayleigh distillation resulted in almost
exactly the same trend as reported for the pure
reaction kinetic approach Fig. 5. The calculation
procedure however was much more complicated with
Rayleigh distillation than with our new model.Ž .One of our reviewers M. Rooney asked about
the possibility and necessity to model isotope effects
for ethane, propane, and other gaseous maturation
products. In principle stable isotope ratios of allŽ .other pyrolysis products N , CO , C , C . . . can2 2 2 3
8/8/2019 Modeling Isotope Fraction During Primary Cracking of Natural Gas
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/modeling-isotope-fraction-during-primary-cracking-of-natural-gas 13/16
( ) B. Cramer et al.r Chemical Geology 149 1998 235–250 247
be computed with our model, if reaction kinetic
parameters are available and isotope ratios were
measured during the pyrolysis experiments. Espe-
cially for the determination of source maturity of
natural gas it appears to be useful to know the
isotope trends of these non-methane gas compounds.
The present work was limited to methane, because
the main goal was to resolve the controversy on the
source of methane in reservoirs of the Pokur forma-
tion. Few additional measurements were made forŽ .ethane and propane Cramer, 1997 , but the database
is much weaker than for methane. In future this type
of measurement and modelling will be performed.
6. Case history northern West Siberia
12 3 Ž .With 40P10 m gas Khartukov et al., 1995about one third of known conventional natural gas
reserves on earth have been found in the northern
part of the West Siberian basin. 95% of this gas
accumulated in the rocks of the Pokur formationŽ .Rovenskaya and Nemchenko, 1992 . It consists of
Žalmost pure methane about 98 vol.% of methane,. 13
less than 1.5 vol.% of C -components with d C-2q
values between y42 to y54‰ and d D-values be-Ž .tween y250 and y180‰ Cramer, 1997 . The ori-
gin of this methane has been discussed extensively
since the first gas pools were discovered in the late1960s. In general three models of methane genera-
tion have been developed. The purity of methane and
its light carbon isotope ratio is consistent with aŽbacterial methane origin Nesterov et al., 1970;
. Ž .Vasil’ev et al., 1970, Schoell, 1995 . Prasolov 1990
presumed a thermogenic methane formation from
highly mature organic matter in deeply buried Trias-
sic and Jurassic sediments, requiring vertical migra-Žtion over large distances to the trap. Galimov 1988,
..1995, Galimov et al., 1990 championed an olderŽidea e.g., Nesterov et al., 1978; Nemchenko and
.Kramarenko, 1985 explaining the methane as ther-
mogenic gas, in situ generated from coaly organic
matter in the Pokur formation during early matura-Ž .tion. More recently Mango 1996 used the isotope
composition of the West Siberian gas to promote his
idea of a thermocatalytic rather than thermogenic or
bacterial gas generation.
In Fig. 6, carbon isotope ratios of methane from
different reservoirs within the Pokur formation of the
Geologicheskaya field are plotted vs. vitrinite re-
flectance. Vitrinite reflectance of the associated PokurŽ .coal was measured by Cramer 1997 . Examples of
empirical relationships between d 13
C of methane and
maturity of source organic matter and our modelled
isotope trends are also plotted in this figure. The
Geologicheskaya field is located adjacent to the
Yuzhno Russkoe field, where the rock samples for
our experimental work were cored. The modelled
d 13
C trend of methane for source organic matter
maturity above 1.5% vitrinite reflectance follows the
general trend of the earlier published empirical rela-
tionships. It is situated between the trend of type IIŽ . Žkerogen Fig. 6, line A and type III kerogen Fig. 6,
. Ž .line C both developed by Faber 1987 . The mod-Ž .elled trend is similar 1 to 2‰ lighter to that
predicted by the empirical relationship of Shen et al.Ž . Ž .1988 for coal-derived methane Fig. 6, line B . For
low maturity levels, however, our model calculates
much lighter carbon isotope ratios of methane than
predicted by empirical relationships for type III kero-Ž . 13
gen Fig. 6 . d C-values of methane are as low as
y44‰ at 0.6% vitrinite reflectance. The fluctuations
in modelled carbon isotope compositions below a
vitrinite reflectance of about 0.6% result from the
small number of reactions contributing at the earliest
stage of methane generation. The modelled carbon
isotope ratios of methane for low maturation matchthe isotope ratio of methane from natural gas as
observed today within the reservoirs of the PokurŽ .formation Fig. 6 . The modelled stable carbon iso-
tope ratio of the cumulative methane generated in the
Pokur formation is y46‰.
These results confirm that early thermogenic
methane generated within the Pokur formation should
have an isotopic signature similar to methane within
the large gas accumulations. In this respect the model
of early thermogenic gas generation of GalimovŽ . Ž .1988, 1995 , Galimov et al. 1990 is neither contra-
dicted nor supported. In the Pokur formation only
about 1% of the methane potential is realized up to
now and only this ‘early’ thermogenic methane has
the isotopic signature matching the gas within the
reservoirs. Clearly, the possibility of mixing with
bacterial methane characterized by a similar light
carbon isotope signature is not discarded by these
8/8/2019 Modeling Isotope Fraction During Primary Cracking of Natural Gas
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/modeling-isotope-fraction-during-primary-cracking-of-natural-gas 14/16
( ) B. Cramer et al.r Chemical Geology 149 1998 235–250248
Fig. 6. Carbon isotope composition of methane in natural gas from Geologicheskaya field in the Pokur formation as a function of sourceŽ .organic matter maturity compared with modelled trends and empirical relationships. Empirical relationships for type II A and type III
Ž . Ž . Ž . Ž .kerogen C taken from Faber 1987 for type III kerogen B from Shen et al. 1988 .
data. The influence of a release of methane from
deep groundwater on reservoir filling in northernŽ .West Siberia is discussed elsewhere Cramer, 1997 .
7. Conclusion
A new concept is presented to describe stable
carbon isotope fractionation during generation of
natural gas. The model simulates kinetic isotope
effects as differences in activation energy between
reactions involving12
C- and13
C-methane genera-
tion. This approach is based on established and
widely used concepts of hydrocarbon generation ki-
netics and inherently implies a temperature depen-
dence of the kinetic isotope effect. Methane genera-
tion and isotope fractionation during open-system
pyrolysis experiments are calculated from a set of
parallel first-order reactions. Laboratory experiments
were carried out with two rock samples of the Pokur
formation from northern West Siberia. Measured
carbon isotope ratios of methane generated during
pyrolysis experiments were converted to the geologi-
cal temperature history of the area. The main find-
ings of this work can be summarized as follows.v Isotope values of methane measured during
open-system pyrolysis experiments can be explained
by temperature-dependent kinetic isotope fractiona-
tion from a set of parallel first-order reactions with
assumed equal initial carbon isotope compositions of
methane precursors.The best match between mea-
sured carbon isotope ratios of methane generated
during open-system pyrolysis experiments and model
predictions was obtained by applying a difference in
activation energy between12
C- and13
C-methane
generation of D E s E y E s y102 and y103a a a12 C 13C
J moly1 for the two rock samples. This difference in
activation energy was assumed to be equal for all
parallel reactions.
v Methane precursors in organic matter of coaly
sandstones from the Pokur formation show a carbonŽ .isotope composition evidently lighter y33.2‰ than
Ž .bulk organic matter y23.5‰ .
8/8/2019 Modeling Isotope Fraction During Primary Cracking of Natural Gas
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/modeling-isotope-fraction-during-primary-cracking-of-natural-gas 15/16
( ) B. Cramer et al.r Chemical Geology 149 1998 235–250 249
v Because of its direct relation to kinetic parame-
ters the new isotope fractionation concept can be
incorporated into numerical basin models to simulate
carbon isotope ratios of methane from individual
source rocks and for individual basin histories.
v We hope that our new model will develop into
a proper tool for hydrocarbon exploration. For this
purpose it will be necessary to model hydrocarbon
generation and associated isotope fractionation from
many well studied source rocks around the world.
v Application of the model to source bed organic
matter of the Pokur formation from northern West
Siberia provides an explanation of light methane
within the gas accumulations of the Pokur formation
as in situ generated thermogenic gas derived from
the low mature coaly organic matter.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. R.G. Schaefer and A.
Kolloff for support with the pyrolysis experiments
and the interpretation of kinetic parameters. We are
grateful to Dr. N.V. Lopatin, O.I. Simonenkova and
P. Gerling who offered isotope data of natural gas
from northern West Siberia. The authors thank M.
Rooney and an anonymous reviewer for important
and specific improvements. The study benefitted
considerably from substantial, in particular financial
sup port by R uhrga s, E ssen , V EB A O il,Gelsenkirchen, and Wintershall, Kassel. Financial
support by the Bundesministerium fur Bildung, Wis-¨Ž .senschaft, Forschung und Technologie BMBF ,
Kennziffer GAS 1000, is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Berner, U., 1989, Entwicklung und Anwendung empirischer Mod-
elle fur die Kohlenstoffisotopenvariationen in Mischungen¨thermogener Erdgase. Dissertation, TU Clausthal, 160 pp.,
Clausthal.
Berner, U., Faber, E., 1988. Maturity related mixing model for
methane, ethane and propane, based on carbon isotopes. Org.Ž .Geochem. 13 1–3 , 67– 72.
Berner, U., Faber, E., Stahl, W., 1992. Mathematical simulation of
the carbon isotopic fractionation between huminitic coal and
related methane. Chem. Geol. 94, 315–319.
Berner, U., Faber, E., Scheeder, G., Panten, D., 1995. Primary
cracking of algal and landplant kerogens: kinetic models of
isotope variations in methane, ethane and propane. Chem.
Geol. 126, 233–245.
Braun, R.L., Burnham, A.K., 1987. Analysis of chemical reaction
kinetics using a distribution of activation energies and simpler
models. Energy and Fuels 1, 153–161.
Clayton, C., 1991. Carbon isotope fractionation during natural gas
generation from kerogen. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 8, 232–240.
Cramer, B., 1997, Methan im nordlichen Westsibirischen Becken¨
—Bildung, Lagerstattendynamik und Austausch mit der At-¨mosphare. Ber. Forschungszentrum Julich, Julich, Germany,¨ ¨ ¨3412, 187 pp.
Faber, E., 1987. Zur Isotopengeochemie gasformiger Kohlen-¨Ž .wasserstoffe. Erdol Erdgas Kohle Z. 103 5 , 210–218.¨
Galimov, E.M., 1974. Characteristics of the kinetic isotope effect
in the degradation of organic matter. Zh. Fizicheskoj KhimiiŽ .48 6 , 811–814.
Galimov, E.M., 1988. Sources and mechanisms of formation of
gaseous hydrocarbons in sedimentary rocks. Chem. Geol. 71,
77–95.
Galimov, E.M., 1995. Genezis gazov na severe Zapadnoj Sibiri po13 wdannym d C i d D metana. Formation of natural gas in the
north of West Siberia based on d 13
C- and d D-values of x Ž .methane Dokl. Akad. Nauk. 342 3 , 371–374.
Galimov, E.M., Posyagin, V.I., Prokhorov, V.S., 1972. Carbon
isotope fractionation as a function of temperature in the CH –4
C H –C H –C H system. Geokhimiya 8, 674–681.2 6 3 8 4 10
Galimov, E.M., Lopatin, N.V., Shabayeva I.Y., The origin of gas
accumulations in Western Siberia. In: Durrance, E.M., Gal-
imov, E.M., Hinkle, M.E., Reimer, G.M., Sugisaki, R., Au-Ž .gustithis, S.S. Eds. , Geochemistry of Gaseous Elements and
Compounds, Theophrastus Publ., Athens, 1990, pp. 401–417.
Grace, J.D., Hart, G.F., Urengoy gas field—USSR West Siberian
Basin, Tyumen District. In: Beaumont, E.A, Foster, N.H.Ž .Eds. , AAPG Treatise of Petroleum Geology, Atlas of Oil and
Gas Fields, Structural Traps: III, Tectonic Fold and Fault
Traps, 1990, A-109, pp. 309–335.¨Hanbaba, P., Juntgen, H., Zur Ubertragbarkeit von Laboratoriums¨—Untersuchungen auf geochemische Prozesse der Gasbildung
aus Steinkohle und uber den Einfluß von Sauerstoff auf die¨Ž .Gasbildung. In: Schenk, P.A., Havenaar, I. Eds. , Adv. Org.
Geochem., Pergamon, Oxford, 1969, pp. 459–471.
Hoefs, J., Stable Isotope Geochemistry, 4th edn., Springer, Berlin,
1996, 200 pp.
Huang, T.-S., Kass, W.J., Buddenbaum, W.E., Yankewich, P.E.,
1968. Anomalous temperature dependence of kinetic carbon
isotope effects and the phenomenon of crossover. J. Phys.
Chem. 72, 4431–4446.
Juntgen, H., van Heek, K.H., Reaktionsablaufe unter nicht-isother-¨ ¨men Bedingungen. In: Davison, A., Dewar, M.J.S., Hafner,
K., Heilbronner, E., Hofmann, U., Niedenzu, K., Schaefer, K.,Ž .Wittig, G. Eds. , Fortschritte der chemischen Forschung, Top-
ics Curr. Chem., 1970, Vol. 13, pp. 601–699.
Khartukov, E.M., Vinogradova, O.V., Surovtsev, D.A., 1995.
Former Soviet Union: at the threshold. World Oil 8–95,
83–96.
Krooss, B.M., Littke, R., Muller, B., Frielingsdorf, J., Schwochau,¨K., Idiz, E.F., 1995. Generation of nitrogen and methane from
8/8/2019 Modeling Isotope Fraction During Primary Cracking of Natural Gas
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/modeling-isotope-fraction-during-primary-cracking-of-natural-gas 16/16
( ) B. Cramer et al.r Chemical Geology 149 1998 235–250250
sedimentary organic matter: implications on the dynamics of
natural gas accumulations. Chem. Geol. 126, 291–318.
Mango, F.D., 1996. Transition metal catalysis in the generation of
natural gas. Org. Geochem. 24, 977–984.
Nemchenko, N.N., Kramarenko, G.A., 1985. Formirovanie za-
lezhej uglevodorodov melovogo kompleksa severa ZapadnojwSibiri. Formation of hydrocarbon accumulations in Cretaceous
xstrata of the north of West Siberia Sovj. Geol. 12, 2– 23.
Nesterov, I.I., Nemchenko, N.N., Rovenskaya, A.S., Krashin,D.I., Syngaevskij, E.D., Shpil’man, K.A., 1970, Izotopnyj
sostav prirodnykh gazov mestorozhdenij Zapadnoj Sibiri—
Zakonomernosti razmeshcheniya uglevodorodnykh gazov iŽsoputstvuyushchikh im komponentov isotope composition of
natural gas from reservoirs of West Siberia—what controls the.distribution of hydrocarbon gas and related components . Dokl.
Akadem. Nauk SSSR: pp. 67– 71.
Nesterov, I.I., Nemchenko, N.N., Rovenskaya, A.S., Shpil’man,
K.A., 1978. Argon isotopes and genesis of natural gas of
Northwest Siberia. Dokl. Akadem. Nauk SSSR 230, 239–240.
Prasolov, E.M., Izotopnaya geokhimiya i proiskhozhdenie prirod-Žnykh gazov Isotope geochemistry and formation of natural
.gas Nedra, Leningrad, 1990, 283 pp.
Rayleigh, R.S., 1896. Theoretical considerations respecting the
separation of gases by diffusion and similar processes. Philos.
Mag. 42, 493–498.
Rooney, M.A., Claypool, G.E., Chung, H.M., 1995. Modeling
thermogenic gas generation using carbon isotope ratios of
natural gas hydrocarbons. Chem. Geol. 126, 219–232.
Rossmann, A., Butzenlechner, M., Schmidt, H.-L., 1991. Evi-
dence for a nonstatistical carbon isotope distribution in natural
glucose. Plant Physiol. 96, 609–614.
Rovenskaya, A.S., Nemchenko, N.N., 1992. Prediction of hydro-
carbons in the West Siberian basin. Bull. Cent. Rech. Explor.
Prod. Elf Aquitaine 16, 285–318.
Sackett, W.M., 1978. Carbon and hydrogen isotope effects during
the thermocatalytic production of hydrocarbons in laboratorysimulation experiments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 42, 571–
580.
Schaefer, R.G., Kolloff, A., Littke, R., Galushkin, Yu.I., 1998.
Reaction kinetics of gas formation in selected source rocks of
the West Siberian Basin: implications for the mass balance of
early-thermogenic methane, Chem. Geol., in press.
Schaefer, R.G., Schenk, H.J., Hardelauf, H., Harms, R., 1990.
Determination of gross kinetic parameters for petroleum for-
mation from Jurassic source rocks of different maturity levels
Ž .by means of laboratory experiments. Org. Geochem. 16 1–3 ,
115–120.
Schenk, H.J., Horsfield, B., Krooss, B., Schaefer, R.G.,
Schwochau, K., Kinetics of petroleum formation and cracking.Ž .In: Welte, D.H., Horsfield, B., Baker, D.R. Eds. , Petroleum
and Basin Evolution, Springer, Berlin, 1997, pp. 231–269.
Schoell, M., 1995, A reassessment of the economical potential of
bacterial gas. The 1995 AAPG International Conference and
Exhibition, 10–13 September 1995, p. 57A.Shen, P., Shen, Q., Wang, X., Xu, Y., 1988. Characteristics of
isotope composition of gasiform hydrocarbon and identifica-Ž .tion of coal-type gas. Sci. Sin. Ser. B 31, 734–747.
Stahl, W.J., Kohlenstoff-Isotopenanalysen zur Klarung der¨Herkunft norddeutscher Erdgase. Dissertation TU Clausthal,
Clausthal, 1968, 98 pp.
Stahl, W.J., Carey, B.D. Jr., 1975. Source-rock identification by
isotope analyses of natural gas from fields in the Val Verde
and Delaware Basins. West Texas Chem. Geol. 16, 257–267.
Sweeney, J.J., Burnham, A.K., 1990. Evaluation of a simple
model of vitrinite reflectance based on chemical kinetics.Ž .AAPG Bull. 74 10 , 1559–1570.
Tang, Y., Jenden, P.D., Theoretical modelling of carbon and
hydrogen isotope fractionation in natural gas. In: Grimalt,Ž .J.O., Dorronsoro, C. Eds. , Organic Geochemistry: Develop-
ments and Applications to Energy, Climate, Environment and
Human History, San Sebastian, 1995, pp. 1067–1069.
Tissot, B.P., Espitalie, J., 1975. L’evolution thermique de la´ ´matiere organique des sediments: application d’une simulation` ´
Ž .mathematique. Revue de l’Institut Francais du Petrole 30 5 ,´ ´743–777.
Tissot, B.P., Welte, D.H., Petroleum formation and occurrence.
2nd rev. enl. ed. Springer, Berlin, 1984, 699 pp.
van Heek, K.H., Juntgen, H., 1968. Bestimmung der reaktionsk-¨inetischen Parameter aus nicht-isothermen Messungen. Ber.
Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 72, 1223–1231.
Vasil’ev, V.G., Ermakov, V.I., Lebedev, V.S., Nemchenko, N.N.,Rovenskaya, A.S., 1970. O proiskhozhdenii prirodnogo gaza
wmestorozhdenij severa Zapadno-Sibirskoj nizmennosti. The
formation of accumulations of natural gas in the north of WestxSiberia Geol. Nefti i Gaza 4, 20–26.
Vogel, P.C., Stern, M.J., 1971. Temperature dependences of
kinetic isotope effects. J. Chem. Phys. 54, 779–796.
Wolfsberg, M., Stern, M.J., 1964. Secondary isotope effects as
probes for force constant changes. Pure Appl. Chem. 8, 325–
338.