modelling pollution dispersion in urban areas
DESCRIPTION
Modelling Pollution Dispersion in Urban Areas. Silvana Di Sabatino Universita’ di Lecce, Dipartimento Scienza dei Materiali, Via Arnesano, 73100 Lecce (I) University of Cambridge, Engineering Department, Trumpington Street, Cambrige, (UK). INCREASING URBANISATION. MOBILITY - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Modelling Pollution Dispersion in Urban Areas
Silvana Di Sabatino
Universita’ di Lecce, Dipartimento Scienza dei Materiali, Via Arnesano, 73100 Lecce (I)
University of Cambridge, Engineering Department, Trumpington Street, Cambrige, (UK)
INCREASING URBANISATION
• MOBILITY
• WIND ENVIRONMENT / LOADING
/ PEDESTRIAN / COMFORT
• URBAN CLIMATOLOGY
• URBAN AIR QUALITY
• INDOOR AIR QUALITY/VENTILATION
• ENERGY USAGE
• WEATHER MODELLING
• HAZARDOUS RELEASES
SPATIAL SCALE OF THE PROBLEM
REGIONAL up to 200km-larger
CITY up to 20km
NEIGHBOURHOOD up to 2km
STREET (CANYON) up to 0.2km
POLLUTANT SOURCE e.g. TAILPIPE
0.0001km
WE SEEK GENERALISED SOURCE-RECEPTOR
RELATIONSHIPS IN THE FORM OF MODELS
STREET (CANYON) SCALE
• WHERE THE PEOPLE AND (THE EMISSIONS)
ARE
• DIRECT CFD/LES IS PRACTICABLE
• OPERATIONAL MODELLING IS TYPICALLY
BASED ON A MORE IDEALISED
RECIRCULATING VORTEX DRIVEN BY A
SHEAR LAYER
• EXCHANGE BETWEEN THE CANYON AND
FLOW ABOVE IS IMPORTANT DIFFICULTIES
IN CRITICAL SITUATIONS WHEN THE WIND
SPEED IS LOW; TRAFFIC PRODUCED
TURBULENCE BECOMES IMPORTANT
-0 .7 5 -0 .5 0 -0 .2 5 0 .0 0 0 .2 5 0 .5 0 0 .7 5
x / H
0 .0
0 .5
1 .0
1 .5
z/H
-0 .7 5 -0 .5 0 -0 .2 5 0 .0 0 0 .2 5 0 .5 0 0 .7 5
x / H
0 .0
0 .5
1 .0
1 .5
z/H
2222 5.05.0 twtvtuttTKE
dzdydxV t
tmt 1
22 2
1 hvCvNP D
Nnumber of vehicles producing turbulence (dimensionless);
DCaverage drag coefficient of the vehicles;
v vehicle speed;
h geometrical length scale of the vehicles (e.g. Awith A = frontal area of
the vehicle; 2h must be the area used in defining the drag coefficients)
fluid density
TRAFFIC-PRODUCED TURBULENCE MODEL
The production of turbulent kinetic energy per unit mass tP is
t
D
t
D
t V
hvCN
V
hvCvNP
2322
2
1
2
1
.
lcmt3
1,
The general form for the dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy per unit mass is given by
l length scale used to model the dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy; i.e.
the dissipation length scale, and
1c dimensionless constant.
t
Dmt V
vlhCNc
32
23
where 112 )2( cc .
Light traffic density - no flow interaction among the vehicles
1N3hVt hl2 2/3 2
3wt Dc C v
cctwwt VVN 22
3hVw cc SLV
HWSc where is the cross-section area in the canyon in which TPT is active
describes turbulence averaged over the traffic layer
describes turbulence averaged over the whole canyon
hWSc
HWSc
the number of vehicles can be expressed as
vv nLLLN /
cDvct S
hvCnc
323/2
42
Intermediate traffic density - interaction between the vehicle wakes
vnLN
cct SLVV
hl
3/2
223/2
52 )(
cDvct S
hvCnc
Large traffic density – strong flow interaction among the vehicles
vv nLl /1
3/2
3423/2
62
cDct S
hvCc
Comparison with Experimental Data
-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
y / H
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
z/H
-0 .25
-0 .2
-0 .15
-0 .1
-0 .05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
y / H
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
z/H
-0 .02
-0 .016
-0 .012
-0 .008
-0 .004
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
0.016
0.02
m/s12tv -1m20vn
20-60 km/h Full scale
222 5.0 vuw
222 )/()/(2/3/ tvtutt vvv
-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
y / H
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
z/H
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
0.05
019.0/ 2 tct v
252 m105 plateAh 23 m106.325.0 WHSc
53/2
23/2
5
2
018.0)( cS
hCnc
v cDv
t
ct
Estimated normalised TKEt scale in the central plane of an idealised
street canyon without external wind-driven flow.
Conclusions
• Traffic produced turbulence (TPT) is important for estimation of pollution concentration levels in streets;
• A theoretical framework for parameterisation of turbulent transport by traffic induced air motions in street canyons is established;
• The analysis distinguishes between three traffic flow conditions: (i) light traffic conditions (isolated vehicles, non-interacting vehicle wakes); (ii) moderate traffic conditions corresponding to non-isolated (interacting) vehicle wakes; and (iii) heavy (congested) traffic conditions characterised by strongly interacting wakes;
• The analysed experimental data give indications of different scaling laws for TPT and resulting concentration fields under different traffic conditions.