modelling ship energy processes with multi-domain simulation

Upload: xahx

Post on 02-Mar-2016

31 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Modelling Ship Energy Processes With Multi-Domain Simulation

TRANSCRIPT

  • Modelling Ship Energy Processes with

    Multi-Domain Simulation

    Seminar for engine technologies

    In Espoo on May 3, 2012

    Presenter: Kari Tammi, Research Professor

    Team: Guangrong Zou, Riku Salokangas,

    Matti Jussila, Mia Elg, Aleksi Halinen,

    Kalevi Tervo, Panu Kovanen

    FIMECC/EFFIMA funded by TEKES

  • 2

    Contents

    Introduction Methodology for the Simulator

    The Ship Energy Flow Simulator

    Model Validation First Results

    Conclusions

  • 3

    Ship Energy Efficiency

    Increasing Fuel need

    Increasingly high Fuel cost

    Accumulatively strict IMO rules

    EEDI energy efficiency design index

    EEOI energy efficiency operational indicator

    SEEMP Ship energy efficiency management plan

    Come into force soon!

  • 4

    Many SEEMP already exists, e.g., ABB EMMA system

    Ship Energy Efficiency

    A simple but efficient tool is still needed to represent the energy distribution and consumption throughout the entire ship

    Ship Energy Flow Simulator

  • 5

    Contents

    Introduction

    Methodology for the Simulator The Ship Energy Flow Simulator

    Model Validation First Results

    Conclusions

  • 6

    Methodology for the simulator

    A general simulation tool for ship power plant

    To be modelled at a system level, not to represent every detail

    All main sub-systems included

    DG sets and electrical systems

    Engine, generator, propulsion, engine room, hotel, theater,

    Engine Fresh Cooling Water systems HT & LT

    LT Auxliary Fresh Cooling Water systems

    LT propulsion Fresh Cooling Water systems

    Steam powered systems EGE, OFB, steam drum, pump,

  • 7

    The simulated processes simplified electrical processes

  • 8

    The simulated processes simplified heat processes

  • 9

    Domains and their component libraries

    Different physical interactions are modelled in DOMAINS in Simscape

    Domains involved in the simulator modelling

    Mechanical domain (,) To model the DG sets Thermal domain (,) To model the heat exchanging process Electrical AC domain ( , ) To model the electrical systems Thermal fluid domain (,, ,) To model the HT and LT systems Steam domain (,, ,) To model the steam powered systems

    Component libraries for each self-developed domain

    Engine, generator, pump, thermostat, evaporator, boiler,

  • 10

    Contents

    Introduction

    Methodology for the Simulator

    The Ship Energy Flow Simulator Model Validation First Results

    Conclusions

  • 11

    The Ship Energy Flow Simulator

    Sub systems Electrical AC 4 DG sets HT FCW STEAM LT AUX FCW LT POD FCW Sea Water Data processing Result display

  • 12

    Sub-system DG set

    The Ship Energy Flow Simulator

    Data Source Wrtsila 46 engine project guide

  • 13

    Contents

    Introduction

    Methodology for the Simulator

    The Ship Energy Flow Simulator

    Model Validation First Results Conclusions

  • 14

    Model validation First results

    Partial validation only

    A large bunch of real-world data is needed for validation

    Extremely difficult to get the data needed, as predicted in the initial plan

    Some reasonable assumption based on the avaliable data

    The available data from a case ship

    Full data for Electrical AC system

    Main data for HT FCW system

    Partial data for STEAM system

    LT AUX and POD FCW systems

  • 15

    Model validation First results DG generated power real, simulation and their comparison

    Ratio = Simulation / real mostly within [0.95 1]

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    x 105

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    4.5x 10

    7

    Time (s)

    Pow

    er (W

    )

    DG power - measured data

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    x 105

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    x 107

    Time (s)

    Pow

    er (W

    )

    DG power - simulation results

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    x 105

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    1.1

    1.2

    1.3

    Time (s)

    Rat

    io

    DG power difference (simulation results / measured data)

  • 16

    Model validation First results Total fuel consumption real, simulation and their comparison

    Ratio = Simulation / real mostly within [0.95 1.15]

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    x 105

    0.75

    0.8

    0.85

    0.9

    0.95

    1

    1.05

    1.1

    1.15

    1.2

    Time (s)

    Rat

    io

    Fuel consumption comparison (simulation results / measured data)

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    x 105

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    Time (s)

    Fue

    l com

    sum

    ptio

    n (l/

    h)

    Total fuel consumption - simulation results

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    x 105

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    Time (s)

    Fue

    l con

    sum

    ptio

    n (l/

    h)

    Total fuel consumption - measured

  • 17

    Model validation First results HT FCW sub-system simulation results

    Water temperature at one engine input and output

    Water massflow rate flowing through the sub-system

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    x 105

    70

    75

    80

    85

    90

    95

    100

    Time (s)

    Te

    mp

    era

    ture

    (C

    )

    Water temperature at HT FCW engine input and output

    output temperatureinput temperature

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    x 105

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Time

    Ma

    ssflo

    w (

    kg/s

    )

    Water massflow rate of HT FCW system

    massflow through enginemassflow to heat recovery

    Those results fit the practical system very well

  • 18

    Saving potential 50 000 / year in one vessel

    Finer regulation of waste heat recovery temperature

    One valve fine tuning

    Fuel savings ~ 50 000 / year / vessel

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10064

    66

    68

    70

    72

    74

    76

    78

    80

    82

    84HT Temperature control of 3-way mixing thermostat

    Engine Load (%)

    Tem

    pera

    ture

    (C)

  • 19

    Contents

    Introduction

    Methodology for the Simulator

    The Ship Energy Flow Simulator

    Model Validation First Results

    Conclusions

  • 20

    Conclusions A simplified ship energy flow simulator is developed to improve ship energy

    efficiency

    The partial validation shows the feasibility and reliability of the energy flow

    simulation method

    Potential usage of the ship energy flow simulator

    Help design an energy-efficient ship

    Guide to efficiently operate a ship

    Test and compare different energy saving technologies and ideas

    Implemented into the existing SEEMP systems for online HIL simulation

    Commercialization is under investigation, NOT ONLY FOR SHIP!

    The project was carried out within FIMECC/EFFIMA programme and funded by TEKES

  • 21

    VTT creates business from technology

    Modelling Ship Energy Processes with Multi-Domain SimulationContentsShip Energy EfficiencyShip Energy EfficiencyContentsMethodology for the simulatorThe simulated processes simplified electrical processesThe simulated processes simplified heat processesDomains and their component librariesContentsThe Ship Energy Flow SimulatorThe Ship Energy Flow SimulatorContentsModel validation First resultsModel validation First resultsModel validation First resultsModel validation First resultsSaving potential 50 000 / year in one vesselContentsConclusionsSlide Number 21