module 2. optimum controller settings : evaluation criteria – iae, ise, itae and ¼ decay ratio...

35
Process Control Instrumentation II Module 2

Upload: byron-dickerson

Post on 22-Dec-2015

238 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Slide 1
  • Module 2
  • Slide 2
  • Optimum controller settings : Evaluation criteria IAE, ISE, ITAE and decay ratio determination of optimum settings for mathematically described processes using time response and frequency response tuning Process Reaction Curve method Ziegler Nichols method Damped oscillation method.
  • Slide 3
  • Evaluation Criteria To define What is a GOOD control, which may differ from process to process. How to Select the type of feedback controller P, PI, PD or PID How to adjust parameters K p, K I, K D We can: 1. Keep the maximum deviation (error) as small as possible. 2. Achieve short settling times. 3. Minimize the Integral of errors until the process has settled to its desired set point.
  • Slide 4
  • Performance Criteria If the criterion is to return to desired value as soon as possible, then we select closed loop response A. If the criterion is to keep the maximum deviation as small as possible we select response B.
  • Slide 5
  • Performance Criteria Steady State Performance Criteria Dynamic Response Performance Criteria Steady State Performance Criteria - Zero error at steady state Proportional controller cannot achieve zero error due to offset, but PI mode can. For a Proportional control steady state error tends to zero when K p
  • Slide 6
  • Performance Criteria Dynamic Response Performance Criteria based on two criteria: Simple Performance Criteria: o uses only a few points of the response. o They are simpler, but only approximate. Time Integral Performance Criteria: o uses entire closed loop response from t=0 to t= very large. o They are precise, but difficult to use.
  • Slide 7
  • Simple Performance Criteria Different parameters like Overshoot, rise time, settling time, decay ratio and frequency of oscillation of the transient are considered. Most popular is DECAY RATIO criterion.
  • Slide 8
  • One Quarter Decay Ratio Criterion
  • Slide 9
  • The measure of decay ratio is found by adjusting the control loop until the deviation from the disturbance is such that each deviation peak is down by one quarter from the preceding peak.
  • Slide 10
  • Time Integral Performance Criteria The shape of complete closed loop response from time t=0 until steady state reached is used. It uses the entire response, but in the case of ratio criteria it uses only isolated characteristics of the dynamic response. It is more precise. In ratio criteria many combinations of controller settings are possible; but in integral criteria only one combination is possible which certainly reduces the error.
  • Slide 11
  • Time Integral Performance Criteria 1.Integral of the Square Error (ISE) ISE criteria give more weight to larger deviations
  • Slide 12
  • Time Integral Performance Criteria 2.Integral of the Absolute value of Error (IAE) It seems the best criterion for process control, since the penalty for control is generally a linear function of the error.
  • Slide 13
  • Time Integral Performance Criteria 3.Integral of the Time weighted Absolute Error (ITAE) ITAE criteria weights deviations more heavily as time increases.
  • Slide 14
  • Time Integral Performance Criteria If we want to suppress large errors, ISE is better than IAE, because the errors are squared and thus contribute more to the value of integral. For the suppression of small errors, IAE is better than ISE because when we square small errors they become even smaller. To suppress errors that persists for longer times, ITAE criterion is better because of the presence of t in the integral term.
  • Slide 15
  • Time Integral Performance Criteria Different criteria lead to different controller designs. For the same time integral criterion, different input changes lead to different designs.
  • Slide 16
  • Selection of Feedback Controller 1.Define an appropriate performance criterion (ISE, IAE or ITAE) 2.Compute the value of the performance criterion using a P or PI or PID controller with the best settings for the adjusted parameters K P, K I and K D 3.Select the controller which gives the best value for the performance criterion.
  • Slide 17
  • Proportional Control a.Accelerates the response of a controlled process. b.Produces an offset. Integral Control a.Eliminates any offset. b.Higher maximum deviation. c.Produces sluggish, long oscillating response. d.If we increase K P to produce faster response, the system become oscillatory and may lead to instability.
  • Slide 18
  • Derivative Control a.Anticipates future errors and introduces appropriate action. b.Introduces a stabilizing effect on the closed-loop response of a process.
  • Slide 19
  • CONTROLLER TUNING Process of deciding what values to be used for its adjusted parameters for a feed back controller. 3 General approaches for controller tuning: 1. Use simple criteria such as decay ratio, minimum settling time, minimum largest error and so on. (Since it provides multiple solutions, additional specifications needed to be considered to reach a single solution and new value to parameters) 2. Use time integral performance criteria (IAE, ISE, ITAE). (it is cumbersome and relies heavily on mathematical model. If applied experimentally on actual process it is time consuming.) 3. Use Semi empirical rules which have been proven in practice.
  • Slide 20
  • PROCESS REACTION CURVE METHOD (Cohen and Coon Method) Also called OPEN LOOP TRANSIENT RESPONSE METHOD. Opening the control loop by disconnecting the controller output from the final control element. Can be used only for systems with self regulation.
  • Slide 21
  • PROCESS REACTION CURVE METHOD
  • Slide 22
  • Open the control loop by disconnecting the controller output from the final control element. Introduce a step change of magnitude A in the variable c which actuates FCE. Record the value of output with respect to time. This curve y m (t) is called PROCESS REACTION CURVE.
  • Slide 23
  • PROCESS REACTION CURVE METHOD PRC is affected by the dynamics of process, sensor and FCE. Cohen and Coon observed a sigmoidal shape which can be approximated to a first order system with a dead time.
  • Slide 24
  • PROCESS REACTION CURVE METHOD
  • Slide 25
  • Static Gain Time constant = slope of the sigmoidal response at the point of inflection. Dead time t d = time elapsed until the system responded Derive expressions for the best controller settings
  • Slide 26
  • PROCESS REACTION CURVE METHOD Proportional Controller
  • Slide 27
  • PROCESS REACTION CURVE METHOD Proportional Integral Controller
  • Slide 28
  • PROCESS REACTION CURVE METHOD Proportional - Integral - Derivative Controller
  • Slide 29
  • PROCESS REACTION CURVE METHOD Observations: Gain of PI controller is less than P controller because integral mode makes the system more sensitive (oscillatory). The stabilizing effect of derivative control mode allows the use of higher gains in PID controller compared to P and PI controllers.
  • Slide 30
  • ZIEGLER-NICHOLS METHOD (Ultimate Cycling Method) Also called CLOSED LOOP TUNING METHOD. This method based on frequency response analysis. Adjusting closed loop until steady oscillations occur, controller settings are then based on the conditions that generate the cycling.
  • Slide 31
  • ZIEGLER-NICHOLS METHOD 1.Bring the system to desired operational level (Design condition). 2.Reduce any Integral and derivative action to their minimum effect. 3.Using proportional control only and with feedback loop closed, introduce a set point change and vary proportional gain until the system oscillates continuously. The frequency of continuous oscillations is the cross over frequency, 0 . Let M be the amplitude ratio of the systems response at the cross over frequency.
  • Slide 32
  • ZIEGLER-NICHOLS METHOD 4.Compute the following two quantities: Ultimate Gain K U = 1/M Ultimate period of sustaining cycling, P U = 2/ CO min/ cycle 5.Using the values of K U and P U compute controller settings.
  • Slide 33
  • ZIEGLER-NICHOLS METHOD Mode KPKP T I (minutes) T d (minutes) Proportional K U /2-- Proportional-Integral K U /2.2P U /1.2- Proportional-Integral-Derivative K U /1.7P U /2P U /8
  • Slide 34
  • DAMPED OSCILLATION METHOD Sustained oscillations for testing purpose are not allowable in many plants. So Ziegler- Nichols Method cannot be used. More accurate than Closed loop method By using only proportional action and starting with a low gain, the gain is adjusted until the transient response of the closed loop shows a decay ratio of . The reset time and derivative time are based on the period of oscillation, P, which is always greater than the ultimate period P U.
  • Slide 35
  • DAMPED OSCILLATION METHOD For PID control T D = P/6 T I = P/1.5