module 51 module 5 water treatment on completion of this module you should be able to: be aware of...
TRANSCRIPT
1Module 5
Module 5 Water TreatmentOn completion of this module you should be able to:
• Be aware of the objectives of water treatment
• Have an appreciation of the location, layout of a plant
• Describe the processes involved in water treatment
• Discuss the types of separation processes
• Design a simple sedimentation tank
2Module 5
Basic Methods for Correcting Water Quality Deficiencies
• The processes and extent of required treatment are dependent on the nature and degree of quality deficiencies to be corrected.
• There is virtually no water that cannot be treated to potable standards. Cost effectiveness is one of the guiding principles
• The basic methods are physical and chemical processes and to a lesser extent, biological
Module 5 3
WaterTreatmentmatrix
Module 5 4
5Module 5
Plant Layout and Headloss Through the Plant
• Planning and environmental constraints
• Selected source
• Plant design factors
• Site factors
• Environmental factors
• Unit processes should lie on the system gravity hydraulic grade line
6Module 5
Preliminary TreatmentDepending on the source, the following unit processes are likely
• Intake screens
• Aeration
• Preliminary settling tanks
• Pre-chlorination and algal control
Module 5 7
Intake screen
8Module 5
Aeration
• Increase dissolved oxygen in ‘stale’ water
• Remove or reduce dissolved CO2 and other gases
• Precipitate out dissolved ferrous and manganese compounds
• Reduce volatile impurities and odour
• Various methods of aeration e.g. spray, cascade, tray and diffused air
Module 5 9
Preliminary settling tank
10Module 5
Chemical treatment through coagulation
• Coagulants are chemicals that react with colloidal matter to form absorbent bulky precipitates (flocs)
• Destabilisation of colloidal particles (10-3 - 1 m), hydrophilic or hydrophobic in nature
• Salts of aluminium and iron form insoluble hydroxides
• Reaction is pH dependent (6 - 7 optimum range)
11Module 5
Aluminium salts are commonly used
• Aluminium sulfate; sodium aluminate
• Natural or added alkalinity is required
• Al2(SO4)3 + 3Ca(HCO3)2 2Al(OH)3 + 3CaSO4 + 6CO2
• Reaction is sensitive to pH
• May revert to soluble for if pH increases/decreases
• Some recent concerns relating to health issues
12Module 5
Aluminium sulfate
• Al2(SO4)3 + 6H2O 2Al(OH)3 + 3H2SO4
• H2SO4 + Ca(OH)2 CaSO4 + 2H2O
• Al2(SO4)3 + 3Ca(HCO3)2 2Al(OH)3 + 3CaSO4 + 6CO2
In the absence of alkalinity
Natural alkalinity
13Module 5
Iron salts are more difficult to control
• Ferric chloride/iron(III) chloride; ferric sulfate
• 2FeCl3 + 3Ca(HCO3)2 2Fe(OH)3 + 3CaCl2 + 6CO2
• Natural or added alkalinity is required
• Wider operating pH range
• Cheaper material and forms heavier floc
• Iron salts cake and are dirty to handle, difficult sludge to dispose
14Module 5
Coagulant aids
• They assist difficult coagulant processes and result in dramatic improvement with increased floc formation and faster settling
• Polyelectrolytes of organic synthetic high molecular weight material with electrical charges
• Clays, lime, soda ash and activated silica are other examples of coagulant aids
15Module 5
Optimum coagulant dosage
• Use of laboratory jar test
• Determine least cost of chemicals that remove turbidity, colour in an shortest possible time
• Comparison of first floc appearance, floc size, dosage and settling time
• Optimum dosage also tested against pH
Module 5 16
Optimumcoagulantdosageusing the jar test
17Module 5
Flash/Rapid MixingTo cause rapid dispersion at minimum power input
• Use of various devices e.g. bends, baffles, can result in energy losses
• Energy for good mixing requires 3 - 15 kW.s/m3
• 30 - 60 sec detention time at maximum flow
• Rate of chemical diffusion is quantified by the shear velocity gradient, G = [P/(V)]0.5
18Module 5
Flash/Rapid Mixing (cont)
• G = 500 - 600 s-1 at 30 - 60 s residence time
• Mechanical power for head loss, P = Q g h watt
• Head loss from hydraulic mixing varies 0.15 - 0.5 m
• Excessive G values can be harmful
• Increased contact time of 120 s or more achieve little
Module 5 19
Flash/Rapid Mixer
20Module 5
FlocculationGentle stirring following rapid mixing so that floc particles can coalesce and agglomerate
• Two phases are involved; initial perikinetic, orthokinetic > 1 m
• Shear velocity gradient, G = 20 - 75 s-1
• Detention time, t = 20 - 60 minutes
• Camp No, G t of (12 to 270) x 103
• Mechanical flocculation power input
• Tapered flocculation using high G values and progressively lower as floc size increase
Module 5 21
Relationship between Shear Gradient and time, t
Module 5 22
A Mechanical Flocculator
23Module 5
SedimentationRemoval of suspended particles in an aqueous medium through gravity settling
• Class I Unhindered settling of discrete particles
• Class II Settling of dilute suspension of flocculent particles
• Class III Hindered settling and zone settling
• Class IV Compressive settling (compaction)
24Module 5
Class I settlingFor discrete particles settling freely, the terminal velocity is reached when gravitational force is balanced by frictional drag force
• vs = g d2 (1 - )/(18 )
• As particle size increases, vs increases
• As CD increases vs decreases
• CD varies inversely as NR
Module 5 25
26Module 5
Class I settling (cont)
• Detention time, t = Volume/Q
• Depth of tank is not relevant, vs = Q/surface area
• Performance is influenced by overflow rate and detention time
• High water temperature decreases CD and thus increases vs
Module 5 27
Drag coefficient
28Module 5
Shallow depth sedimentation
• Proposed as early as 1904 with initial failure
• Obvious inherent advantages
• Tube clarifiers with high surface loading rates achieve 9 m/h
• Plated tanks in zig-zag pattern, vh = 44 m/h, HRT of 22 min
• Lamella separator with vs = 20 m/h
Module 5 29Tube clarifier at Mt Kynoch settling tank
Module 5 30
Shallow depth sedimentation
Plate settler tank
Module 5 31
Shallow depth sedimentation
Lamella separator tank
32Module 5
Difficult settling operation conditions
• Excessive suspended solids
• High colloidal content
• Coincidence of peak demand and high turbidity
• Low coefficient of fineness < 1
• Low temperature, overturn
• Persistent wind condition
• Streaming caused by density currents, temperature gradients
33Module 5
Settlement in horizontal flow tanks
• Overflow rates varies from 18 to 54 m/d
• Typically 28 m/d for a 3.5 m depth and 3 h HRT
• In tropical countries with more turbid water, 18 m/d with 4 h HRT is appropriate with depths of 3 - 3.5 m
• In practice, particles are not wholly discrete and there is merit in depth
• As a preliminary guide use HRT x (TSS/900)0.5 h to adjust for varying TSS in water
Module 5 34
A typical horizontal flow sedimentation tank
35Module 5
Settlement in upward flow tanks
• Area of tank to ensure vs > v = Q/A
• In practice, vs 2 v• vs = 3 m/h for well formed floc
• = 6 - 10 m/h with coagulant aids
• = 8 m/h in water softening plants
• Types: hopper bottomed sludge blanket square tanks, solid contact clarifiers, pulsator
Module 5 36
Vertical flow tank
Module 5 37
Pulsator
Module 5 38
Solids contact clarifier
39Module 5
FlotationAn effective means of removal of particles of density less than the liquid medium
• Use of air bubbles to separate solids/particulates from a liquid phase
• Air bubbles (20 - 100 m) generated by dissolved air flotation, diffused air flotation and vacuum filtration
• Attachment of solids to bubbles in a 3 phase system; size of flocs less important
• Solids separation through a floating scum and removed by a skimmer
40Module 5
Flotation (cont)
• Advantage of high surface loading rates 5 - 12 m/h, and the ability to remove oils, grease and algae
• Short HRT of 40 - 80 minutes; bubbles rise at 1 - 1.5 mm/s
• Flotation units are smaller in size than normal clarifiers
• Saving in chemical costs
• Optimum amount of air is determined from pilot studies
• Disadvantage of additional equipment cost, high operating cost and energy use
Module 5 41
Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF)
Module 5 42
Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF)
Dissolved air flotation
43Module 5
FiltrationA process of passing water through a sand bed or other suitable medium at low speed to remove suspended solids
• Removal of non-settleable flocs after coagulation and sedimentation
• Properties of the medium (effective size, hardness etc)
• More than a mechanism of straining
44Module 5
Mechanisms of filtration
• Straining
• Sedimentation
• Interception
• Adhesion
• Flocculation
• Adsorption
45Module 5
Rapid sand filterA process of depth filtration as solids are removed within the granular medium
• Sand bed 0.6 - 0.75 m deep of 0.4 - 0.7 mm effective size and a uniformity coefficient 1.7
• Supporting gravel layer 0.3 - 0.5 m (graded 2 - 60 mm)
• Underdrain system to collect filtered water and to discharge air scour and backwash water uniformly
• Filtration rate varies from 4 - 15 m/h
46Module 5
Rapid sand filter (cont)
• Backwash when head loss 2 m
• Application of backwash water assumes practical importance in the design of filters
• Some problems associated with rapid sand filters are mud balls, air-binding, surface cracks and shrinkage
• Other forms are direct filtration, and up-flow filtration
Module 5 47
Arrangement of filter media
clogs up readily ideal but unattainable
Module 5 48
Typical rapid sand filter
Module 5 49
Rapid sand filter isometric view (Droste 1997, p. 418)
Module 5 50
Types of filter underdrain system (McGhee, 1991, p.212)
51Module 5
Flow control for rapid sand filtersMost systems include some means of automatic flow control valves operated by signals from level-sensing or flow-sensing elements
• Flow control systems are usually operated hydraulically or pneumatically
• Avoid control conditions that lead to controller instability e.g. 'hunting' caused by continual over correction
• Downstream flow control
• Upstream flow control
• Control system with common head loss
Module 5 52
Rapid sand filter flow control systems
53Module 5
Problems associated with rapid sand filters
• Negative head
• Dirty filter media (mud ball formation)
• Mineral deposits
• Gravel movement during backwashing
• Underdrain failure
Module 5 54
Negative head
55Module 5
Slow sand filtersThese are the oldest and effective method for removing pathogenic microorganisms in water. Cake filtration when solids are removed on entering the face of the granular material
• No pre-treatment or chemicals are required
• Filter media 0.7 - 1.2 m layer of 0.2 - 0.4 mm effective size with a uniformity coefficient 3
• Supported on gravel layer 0.1 m (graded 5 - 25 mm)
• Relies on surface straining and microbial action (schmutzdecke)
• Slow filtration rates of 350 - 700 L/s.ha (3 - 6 m/d)
56Module 5
Slow sand filters (cont)
• 1 - 3 months filter run or when head loss 1 m
• Surface renewal by removing 12 - 25 mm of surface layer each time until 600 mm of sand layer is left
• Requires large land area
• Labour intensive to remove and clean the sand
• Suitable for reservoir-fed supply and small communities requiring no technical supervision
• Does not remove colour but is able to deliver bacteriologically superior water
Module 5 57
Slow sand filter
Module 5 58
Pressure filtration
• No different from rapid sand filters
• Filter lies on the HGL
59Module 5
Chlorine disinfectionIt is presently the most cost-effective disinfection method but it has some adverse effects
• Properties of chlorine
• Reaction is highly pH dependent
• Cl2 + H2O HOCl + HCL
• As pH increase the hypochlorous acid (HOCl) will further dissociate to H+ and OCl- (hypochlorite ions)
• HOCL and OCl represent the free available chlorine
60Module 5
Chlorine disinfection (cont)
At 20o CpH %HOCL %Ocl
6 97 3
7 79 21
8 21 73
9 4 96
Chlorine:ammonia reaction
Breakpoint chlorination
Superchlorination
61Module 5
Chlorine - ammonia reaction
Formation of monochloramine (NH2Cl)
HOCl + NH3 H2O + NH2Cl Cl2:NH3 < 5:1; pH 7
Formation of dichloramine (NHCl2)
NH2Cl + HOCl H2O + NHCl2 Cl2:NH3 < 10:1
Formation of trichloramine (NCl3)
NHCl + HOCl H O + NCl3 Cl2:NH3 < 20:1; pH < 4
Monochloramine and dichloramine represent the combined available chlorine, with less disinfecting power compared with the free available chlorine
62Module 5
Breakpoint chlorination
• Oxidation of chloramines until appearance of free available chlorine
• At this point the free available chlorine residual is lowest
• Taste, odour are reduced through oxidation
• Some colour may also be removed
• Good control required to ascertain that breakpoint is reached
Module 5 63
Breakpoint chlorination
64Module 5
Superchlorination
• High concentration of Cl2 is used to completely oxidise ammonia, organics, chlorophenols, colour, taste & odour
• Short contact time and effective when contamination is anticipated
• Dechlorination is necessary using SO2, sodium bisulfate or activated carbon to remove the high chlorine residue
65Module 5
Factors affecting chlorine disinfecting efficiency
• Turbidity and organic matter
• Metallic compounds
• Contact time
• Temperature
• pH value
• Type of microorganisms
66Module 5
Other disfecting agents
• Ozone gas, O3
• Chlorine dioxide
• Iodine, bromine (halogens)
• Silver (metal ions)
• Simple retention time
• Heat
• Ultra-violet light
• Ultrasonic radiation
• Ultra-filtration
67Module 5
Water softening
• Chemical precipitation and ion-exchange
• Carbonate hardness
Ca2+ requires lime to raise the pH to 9.5 – 10 when HCO3- is
changed to CO3
Mg2+ requires more lime to pH 10.5 – 11 when HCO3- is changed to
• Non-carbonate hardness
Ca2+ requires soda ash to precipitate CaSO4
Mg2+ requires soda ash and lime to precipitate to Mg(OH)2 and
CaCO3
68Module 5
Ion-exchange
• Ca2+ and Mg2+ are exchanged for sodium ions from zeolites or resin compounds (Na2R)
• Regeneration by washing with brine solution and CaCl2 and MgCl2 are discharged
• Ion-exchange plants are easy to operate, in-line with the hydraulic gradient
69Module 5
Ion-exchange (cont)
• Flow rate 15 m/h and no solid sludge discharge but not suitable for turbid water or iron > 5 mg/L
• For very hard water, precede with lime-soda ash softening. Water should first be treated by coagulation, sedimentation & filtration prior to ion-exchange process
• Does not reduce total dissolved solids (TDS)
70Module 5
Taste and odourThey are often the immediate and main sources of consumer complaints
• Action by microorganisms, decomposition
• Reduction of sulfates to sulfides under anaerobic condition
• Sewage and industrial discharges
• Reaction with phenols & organics by chlorine
• Urban runoff from asphaltic surfaces
• Leachates from landfills
71Module 5
Taste and odourRemedies
• Aeration may precipitate out iron and remove sulfuretted hydrogen odours found in deep bores
• Superchlorination and dechlorination
• Chloramine of 1:2 – 1:4 of NH3:Cl2 to produce combined available chlorine
• Chlorine dioxide has a stronger oxidising property than chlorine
• Ozonation is more powerful than chlorine and leaves no after-taste, but is also more expensive
• Activated carbon in the form of powder, granular or filter beds, which removes taste and odour by adsorption and also removes a wide range of complex organics eg. pesticides
72Module 5
Iron & manganese removalProblem lies with the variety of reactions that can occur with these element
Oxidation• Aeration followed by sedimentation and filtration
• Use of oxidising agents eg. Chlorine, chlorine dioxide, potassium permanganate
Lime softening
• Increasing pH after aeration to precipitate as Fe(OH)3
Catalytic action
• Oxidation of manganese in zeolite or pyrolusite ore with
KMnO4
73Module 5
Iron & manganese removal (cont)
Ion-exchange
Zeolite or ion-exchange resins to remove Fe3+ and Mn2+ if associated with HCO3
Suitable for groundwater devoid of O otherwise Fe3+ or Mn2+ ions will clog the ion-exchange resin bed
Sequestering
Use of complex molecules to encase the ions of Fe3+ and Mn2+ so that they no longer participate in future reactions
Common sequestering agents are polyphospates or organic compounds eg. ‘Calgon’ (sodium hexametaphosphate) but subsequent heating may destroy treatment
74Module 5
Desalination
Distillation
• Simple to multi-stage distillation
• Multi-stage flash distillation
• Vapour compression
• Solar stills
Freezing
• H2O molecules form and attach to ice crystal, while salt molecules remain in solution
• Latent heat of fusion is 333 kJ/kg
Module 5 75
Desalination
Multi-stage flash distillation (Barnes et al 1986, p.348)
Module 5 76
Vapour compression
77Module 5
Desalination (cont)
Ion-exchange
• Use of cation and anion exchange resins
• Simple recharge using acids for cation resin and alkaline for anion resin
• Na+ + HR H+ + NaR
• R(OH) + Cl- OH- + RCl
Module 5 78
Desalination
Anion and cation exchange (Barnes et al 1986, p.352)
79Module 5
Desalination (cont)
Reverse osmosis
• Membranes permitting only water molecules but not solute to pass
• Under normal osmosis water flows from low solute concentration to high solute concentration
• Osmotic pressure is pressure to stop this flow
• When pressure applied > osmotic, then reverse osmosis occurs
• Turbidity, iron, Mn2+, CaCO3 must first be removed
Module 5 80
Desalination
Reverse osmosis (Barnes et al 1986, p.354)
Module 5 81
Desalination• DALBY commissioned a DESALINATION
PLANT (2004) to supplement water for its 10,000 residents whose regular supply from bores is too brackish
• The $2.8m reverse osmosis plant will supply a quarter of its annual needs at roughly the same price - 32c/kL - as current price for treated summer water drawn from the Condamine River
82Module 5
Desalination (cont)
Electro-dialysis
• Use of electrodes to maintain an electric field in which ions will move as in electrolysis
• 2 kinds of special membrane selective each to cations and anions
• Conditions tend to be acid at anode and alkaline at cathode. To prevent CaCO3 deposits at the cathode it is continually washed with acid rinse
• Operating potential difference 1000 V
Module 5 83
Desalination
Electrodialysis process (Barnes et al 1986, p.357)
84Module 5
End of Module 5 Water Treatment