monitoring and assessment in france rené lalement wis-france taskforce

24
UNSD Voorburg Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development May 2006 Water Directorate Monitoring and assessment in France René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

Upload: eavan

Post on 20-Mar-2016

45 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Monitoring and assessment in France René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce. Monitoring in France water quantity since 1870s ? water quality since 1971 fish since 1993 Multiple extensive networks. Surface water quality. Surface water quantity. Groundwater quality. Groundwater quantity. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Monitoring and assessment in France

René LalementWIS-France Taskforce

Page 2: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Monitoring in France• water quantity since 1870s ?• water quality since 1971• fish since 1993• Multiple extensive networks

Page 3: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Surface water qualitySurface water quantity

Groundwater qualityGroundwater quantity

Pluviometry

Scale 1 : 500 000

Page 4: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Current river quality network• 1700 sites• each year• basic chemicals 6 to 12 times a year in water• heavy metals + pesticides once a year in sediments on a selection of sites. • invertebrates once a year, • diatoms on half of the sites• fish populations on another network of 800 sites.

Page 5: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Monitoring sites in the Loire river basinfor river quality

Page 6: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Current shortcomings

Monitoring sites are located more often on large or medium rivers than on small rivers, with an overall goal for the assessment of measures taken to reduce point source pollution in urban or industrial areas.

There is presently no national network for lakes.

Page 7: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

The Water Framework Directivemonitoring programme:

an opportunity • to rebuild in a consistent way all monitoring activities• to include new needs

(monitoring of lakes, better coverage of all rivers, priority substances, more biology)• to merge with other requirements (EIONet, OSPAR, MedPol, OECD/Eurostat, ...)

This presentation will focus on surface freshwater.

Page 8: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Design of the WFD network for “surveillance monitoring” • Use of research results from CEMAGREF and CSP• Several steps

Step 1: set a total of 1500 sites for France (not including overseas districts)

Step 2: use a key based on river basin area and river lengths to compute the number per district Total AG AP LB RM RM&C SN

Current network 1713 284 196 280 250 260 443Future network 1500 340 45 417 112 395 214

Page 9: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Step 3: within a hydrographic district, use a river size stratification (XS to XL)

Rule: compute the minimum number of sites in each stratum to guarantee that the uncertainty on the ammonium parameter (identified to have the greatest variability) be less than 10%.

This had to be tuned in some districts when upper size strata do not occur.

XS S M L XLLoire-Bretagne 76% 7% 4% 2% 1%

XS S M L XL30% 25% 20% 12.5% 12.5%

Loire-Bretagne 126 105 80 49 49

Page 10: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Step 4: consider the water body type

in every district and in every size stratum, the number of monitoring sites has been distributed among the ecological types, according to the total river length in each type,

leading for instance to 2 sites in small rivers of armorican type (in Britanny).

Step 5: use the local knowledge of the conditions to locate the sites, to ensure the best representativeness.

Once defined, this monitoring network will be immutable.

Page 11: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Tuning monitoring parameters and frequencies

1 (or less) / management plan (every 6 yrs, once): hydromorphological elements

2 / management plan (every 3 yrs, once a year): other pollutants and pesticides, in sediment

2 / management plan (every 3 yrs, 4 times a year): other pollutants and pesticides, in water

2 / management plan (every 3 yrs, monthly): priority substances

6 / management plan (every year, once): biological quality elements

6 / management plan (every year, 6 times a year): basic chemicals (O2, nutrients, TOC, ...).

Page 12: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

CostsThe estimated cost of the surveillance monitoring programme is• 77 M€ for rivers and • 8M€ for lakes

for a management plan, or • 50 k€ for rivers • 40 k€ for lakes

per site for a management plan, or• 150 €/km2 (rivers and lakes), or • 150 €/km (rivers).

Page 13: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Design of operational monitoringOperational monitoring is intended for water bodies which may fail to meet their environmental objectives in 2015, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of policies.

It will apply to water bodies to which the river basin management plan does not assign a good status objective in 2015, but:• an extended deadline (2015, 2021), • or a less stringent objective

The full design of the monitoring network, including operational monitoring, will be completed along with the first management plan, in 2008-2009.

Page 14: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Water quality assessment in France• 1971 Water Quality Grid• 1999 Water Quality Evaluation System (SEQ-eau)• 2007 Water Status Evaluation System

needed for:• Knowledge• Water management• Policy assessment• Accountability

Page 15: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

1971 Water Quality Gridbased on 13 physico-chemical determinants• 3 thresholds for every determinant

• leads to 4 classes: high, good, poor, bad• the worst determinant wins• still has a regulatory scope (for setting objectives in the current river basin management plans)• ... but too « multipurpose », no ecology

BOD5 in mg/l O2 < 3 3 to 5 5 to 10 10 to 25

Page 16: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

SEQ-eau• an assessment framework, • with several instances:• rivers, lakes, coastal waters, groundwaters, ...

• use-oriented• uses: drinking water, leisure, irrigation, livestock watering, aquaculture + aquatic life

• based on 15 suitability indicators• Indicators computed from 135 determinants• matrices: • determinants X indicators (computed from)• uses X indicators (significant for)• determinants X classes (threshold values)

Page 17: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Page 18: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Page 19: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Results in • a class of suitability for each use • an index (and class) for overall quality

For each indicator, the worst determinant wins

For each use, the worst indicator wins

For each determinant, apply the percentile 90 rule to multiple samples (not the average)

... an in depth assessment for uses, but little ecology : independant of « ecotype » !

Page 20: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Page 21: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Page 22: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Water body status evaluation system

required by the Water Framework Directive

chemical status based on environmental quality standards

ecological statusbased on • type-specific reference conditions• indicators for relevant quality elements• ecological quality ratios (observation/reference)• division of the scale into 5 classes• intercalibration of high/good and good/moderate boundaries

Page 23: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

Biological quality elements

biological indicators should be made “WFD-compatible” by introducing the water body type in their definition• IBGN (Standard global biological index) for benthic invertebrates, • IBD (Diatom biological index)• IPR (River fish index) – defined to be type-dependant

Page 24: Monitoring and assessment in France  René Lalement WIS-France Taskforce

UNSD Voorburg

Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable

Development

May 2006

Water Directorate

On the Web

Portal for public information on water:http://www.eaufrance.fr

Water information framework:http://www.sandre.eaufrance.fr

French water policy:http://www.ecologie.gouv.fr