MONTGOMERY MATH K-4WHY MATH IN FOCUS?May 28, 2013Board of Education Meeting

Amy WishK-4 Supervisor of Mathematics and Science

Goals

1. Detail the process we used to choose Math in Focus for our anchor resource.

2. Explain why we believe Math in Focus is the best choice for our elementary program.

Math Materials Review

Everyday Mathematics, Common

Core Edition

enVision Math

Do the Math

Go Math

Math in Focus, The Singapore

Approach

2012-2013 Math Pilot

• 2012-2013 School Year• 4 Classrooms in each grade level Kindergarten through Fourth Grade• Included settings in: General Education, Academic Support, Enrichment & In-

class Support • Included 3 resource room settings (grades K, 2, 4)

Summer Orientation Pilot Training Pilot Meetings Scope & Sequence

Meetings PLC groups Faculty Meetings Comparative Mid Year

Assessment Hosted classroom visits Provided Q & A sessions for

teachers Before & After School

Workshops

Parent Meetings & Student Feedback

Parent Conversation Sessions: April 2-5, 2013

Two Goals: Enhance understanding of what elementary school

students are expected to know and be able to do in mathematics.

Collaborate to improve our students’ mathematics education.

Outcomes: Three themes: communication, consistency and

experiences that foster growth for every child Parent Advisory Committees & Parent Workshops Parent Support for Math in Focus

Student Feedback: Want to have fun in math Want the right level of challenge

PARCC Publishers’ Criteria

K-8 Sample Rubric Focus Coherence Rigor

Math in Focus average rubric score higher than Everyday Mathematics

Focus Coherent connections Consistent progressions

http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Math_Publishers_Criteria_K-8_Summer%202012_FINAL.pdf

SELECT S= state the decision E= establish & classify objectives L= list alternatives

E= evaluate alternatives C= consider risks T= trust your work

All K-4 staff who teach mathematics involved, 92 teachers polled

Kepner-Tregoe Decision Analysis Protocol

SState the Decision

 

What is the purpose of the decision?We want the best anchor resources available that will support students’ thorough understanding of the Common Core math standards as outlined in our updated curriculum.

 OUR CHOICE: We need to choose anchor resources AND decide when to switch to them.

E   Establish & Classify Objectives

Results we need:Students mastering concepts and skills as outlined in grade level Common Core standards. 

How they will be measured:Individual growth, school progress, and DFG

comparison on: District benchmark assessments

(concept/skill, fact fluency & problem solving)

NJASK (Eventually PARCC) Academic Support identification Growth on Common Core MAP math

scores 

 

Considerations:1. Is the instructional design directed

towards student mastery of content/skills?

2. Is materials implementation realistic given district priorities and teacher load?

3. Are the resources developmentally appropriate?

4. Do they differentiate for ranges of learners?

5. Do they address fact fluency & problem solving?

6. Are the resources manageable?7. Do they embed professional

development?8. Are they aligned to NJASK/PARCC

assessments?9. *Parent & student feedback

Restrictions:1. Need to implement Common Core

standards now2. Professional Development priorities

in LA (overall district priorities)3. PARCC test specs not released 4. PARCC not expected to be

implemented until 2014-20155. Money6. Budget due 11/16/127. Time restrictions for coherent

curriculum development & implementation

8. *Publishing Guidelines criteria

LList Alternatives

 Everyday Math

2012 

 Math in Focus

 Math in Focus

 phased in :

K-2 in 2013-14, 3-4 in 2014-15

 Envisions

 Pilot 2013-14

Implement 2014-15

 Build Our Own

 Composite of

many programs & resources

 Other

 Suggested

Programs to pilot?

Decision Analysis Results

Considerations Everyday Mathematic

s

Math in Focus

Instructional Design (x10) 5.6 8.2Realistic Implementation (x9) 6.1 7.9

Developmental Appropriateness (x9)

6.4 8.0

Differentiate for All Learners (x8)

5.4 8.2

Addresses Facts & Problem Solving (x7)

5.0 8.1

Manageable Resources (x6) 6.2 8.1Professional Development (x5) 5.1 7.2

PARCC Aligned (x9) 4.0 8.0

SCALED SCORE 344.6 504.0Evaluation Scale: Excellent- 10, Good- 8, Adequate- 6, Poor- 4, Not Acceptable- 1

How did we make decisions?

Review of Materials

Math Pilot

Parent Meetings & Student Feedback

PARCC Publisher’s Criteria

Kepner-Tregoe Decision Analysis

Board of Education Presentation

Why Math in Focus?

Organizational structure supports mastery

Unit Topic Structure

Focus and Supporting Work for the grade

Priorities and Boundaries

Why Math in Focus?

Adequate resources for differentiation

Why Math in Focus?

Technology components to support learning & assessment

Why Math in Focus?

Very strong focus on word problems & computational fluency

Why Math in Focus?

Well Aligned:

Common Core Standards PARCC Publishers’ Criteria

Montgomery Program Philosophy Differentiated Math Workshop Structures

Teacher needs Parent requests

Student feedback

Anchor Resource Recommendation

The Common Core Standards in Mathematics define our curriculum goals.

Textbooks support our curriculum, but do not define it.

We recommend Math in Focus as our anchor resource

for grades K-4.

We will continue to use teacher made materials as well as Problem Solver II books, Kathy Richardson activities and the

Compass Learning Odyssey online program as supporting resources as needed. However, thanks to a solid anchor

resource, we will deliver Common Core instruction with more fidelity.

Math Program PhilosophyMontgomery School District's K-4 Mathematics Curriculum is organized around five content clusters: Operations & Algebraic Thinking, Number in Base Ten, Fractions, Geometry, and Measurement & Data. All content clusters and the five process skills (problem solving, communication, connections, reasoning, & representation) are addressed in every grade level of the program, building a strong and balanced foundation. In addition, we have designed a facts mastery sequence to ensure that our students can fluently and accurately recall basic math facts when performing everyday computations or solving problems. Each grade level introduces problems to be solved and situations to be explored that extend students’ conceptual understandings and skills beyond traditional computation. The curriculum is grounded in the research of how students learn mathematics. We believe our curriculum will foster the development of our students' mathematical intuition and the overall mathematical literacy necessary to succeed in a global society. Instructional designs include:

• High expectations for all students• Dynamic real-world and cross curricular applications, including the use of technology• Concrete modeling as a pathway to abstract understanding• A problem-solving approach that develops critical thinking skills, strategy development, the application of concepts, and communication• Frequent practice of basic skills through mathematical games• An instructional approach that revisits topics in a variety of contexts to ensure full conceptual development and retention• Collaborative learning in partner and small group activities

Montgomery’s math curriculum is aligned with the Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSI) and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics’ (NCTM) Standards. Therefore, it adequately prepares our students for the New Jersey Statewide Assessment Program. More importantly, however, the curriculum is designed to foster student growth and to develop students’ abilities and motivation to become life-long mathematical thinkers and problem solvers.