mortality change the details are messy year to year decline irregular persistent, puzzling...

10
MORTALITY CHANGE THE DETAILS ARE MESSY •Year to year decline irregular •Persistent, puzzling differentials •Cause of death structure difficult to understand & to predict •Poor understanding of causal relationship to driving forces •Startling reversibility -- the Former Soviet Union

Upload: alice-francis

Post on 29-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MORTALITY CHANGE THE DETAILS ARE MESSY Year to year decline irregular Persistent, puzzling differentials Cause of death structure difficult to understand

MORTALITY CHANGE

THE DETAILS ARE MESSY

•Year to year decline irregular

•Persistent, puzzling differentials

•Cause of death structure difficult to understand & to predict

•Poor understanding of causal relationship to driving forces

•Startling reversibility -- the Former Soviet Union

Page 2: MORTALITY CHANGE THE DETAILS ARE MESSY Year to year decline irregular Persistent, puzzling differentials Cause of death structure difficult to understand

BUT…

IN THE AGGREGATE (i.e., age/sex)

OVER THE LONG-TERM ( >40 years)

IN HIGHLY INDUSTRIALIZED NATIONS

THERE APPEARS TO BE A

Simple, general (?) pattern of decline

Page 3: MORTALITY CHANGE THE DETAILS ARE MESSY Year to year decline irregular Persistent, puzzling differentials Cause of death structure difficult to understand

m(x,t) = central death rate

log m(x,t) = s a(x) k(t) + r b(x) g(t) + …

Singular Values s > r > … > 0

IF s >> r > …

DOMINANT TEMPORAL PATTERN IS

k(t)

% VARIANCE EXPLAINED IS

s2/(s2 + r2 + …)

Page 4: MORTALITY CHANGE THE DETAILS ARE MESSY Year to year decline irregular Persistent, puzzling differentials Cause of death structure difficult to understand

AGGREGATE AGE/SEX MORTALITY CHANGE

log m(x,t) = a(x ) + b(x) k(t) + e(t)

G-7 = Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, UK, US

Period = 1950 TO 1994

Lee-Carter; Tuljapurkar-Li-Boe

Page 5: MORTALITY CHANGE THE DETAILS ARE MESSY Year to year decline irregular Persistent, puzzling differentials Cause of death structure difficult to understand

IN ALL THE G 7

LEAD TEMPORAL COMPONENT

k(t)

EXPLAINS OVER 92 % OF

VARIATION IN log m(x,t)

Page 6: MORTALITY CHANGE THE DETAILS ARE MESSY Year to year decline irregular Persistent, puzzling differentials Cause of death structure difficult to understand

1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

CanadaFranceGermanyItalyJapanUKUS

Page 7: MORTALITY CHANGE THE DETAILS ARE MESSY Year to year decline irregular Persistent, puzzling differentials Cause of death structure difficult to understand

1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 205074

76

78

80

82

84

86

USA

95%

75%

50%

25%

5%

H

M

L

xe

Year

g

Page 8: MORTALITY CHANGE THE DETAILS ARE MESSY Year to year decline irregular Persistent, puzzling differentials Cause of death structure difficult to understand

1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 205076

78

80

82

84

86

88

UK

95%

75%

50%

25%

5%

H

M

L

xe

Year

f

Page 9: MORTALITY CHANGE THE DETAILS ARE MESSY Year to year decline irregular Persistent, puzzling differentials Cause of death structure difficult to understand

IMPROVING AGGREGATE FORECASTS

1. Take the uncertainty seriously.

2. Use higher components of temporal structure to improve forecasts.

3. Examine and forecast adult mortality separately from infant/child mortality.

4. Decompose differences (e.g., by sex) as deviations from the aggregate.

Page 10: MORTALITY CHANGE THE DETAILS ARE MESSY Year to year decline irregular Persistent, puzzling differentials Cause of death structure difficult to understand

PROBLEMS WITH CAUSE OF DEATH (COD) METHODS

1. DEPENDENCE BETWEEN CAUSES

Risk factors with multiple effects, complex states of health

2. CAUSE STRUCTURE SHIFTS OVER TIME

Causes appear, peak, disappear.

3. LIMITED CAUSAL UNDERSTANDING OF RISK FACTOR DYNAMICS

At population level, hard to use even smoking prevalence, intensity to predict

4. INACCURACY IN COD ASSIGNMENT