motivations, opportunities and challenges of additive manufacturing for space application

32
Motivations, Opportunities and Challenges of Additive Manufacturing for Space Application Franck Mouriaux General Manager Structures RUAG Schweiz AG RUAG Space Dearborn, Mai 6 th 2015

Upload: altair

Post on 16-Aug-2015

120 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Motivations, Opportunities and Challenges of Additive Manufacturing for Space Application

Franck MouriauxGeneral Manager StructuresRUAG Schweiz AGRUAG SpaceDearborn, Mai 6th 2015

manf’flexibility

for free

designcomplexity

for free

designMASS

reduction

leadTIME

reduction

function integration

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│2

Why AM?

FREEDOM

SUPPLIER

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│3

PRODUCT

post-processing verification

How AM?

qualification

design analysis

PROCESS MATERIAL

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│4

WhereAM?

EVERYWHERE

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│5

SENTINEL-1

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│6

Original Design1.6kg88.7Hz163MPa

2First Optimisation Loop1.2kg88.7Hz

1

SENTINEL-1 Antenna Support Bracket

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│7

Original design enveloppe

Original interfaces

Original loading

Original electricalgrounding

SENTINEL-1 Antenna Support Bracket

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│8

Original design enveloppe

Original interfaces

Original loading

Original electricalgrounding

SENTINEL-1 Antenna Support Bracket

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│9

3Final Design0.936kg91.5Hz103MPa

SENTINEL-1 Antenna Support Bracket

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│10

Topology Optimization

Topology Loadpath

CAD interpretation

Baseline CAD Design spaceLoad Cases

Optimisation loops

Model Preparation

Concept Optimis.

ConceptInterpret.

ConceptDesign

DetailedOptimis.

DetailedVerif.

Additive Manf’

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│11

• Understand where to start• Definition of design space• Definition of load cases• Definition of material

Model Preparation

Concept Optimis.

Concept Interpret.

Concept Design

Detailed Optimis.

Stress Verif.

Additive Manf’

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│12

Optimization problem formulation:• Objective: Minimize Mass OR Compliance• Constrains: Vol. frac. / Stress / Freq / Manf’• Variables: Element densities

Model Preparation

ConceptOptimis.

ConceptInterpret.

ConceptDesign

DetailedOptimis.

Stress Verif.

Additive Manf’

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│13

Model Preparation

Concept Optimis.

ConceptInterpret. 4 5 6 7

• Obtained topology must be realized into a proper CAD design

• Understand and apply design principles from AM• Printing orientation• Overhang angle consideration• Heat dissipation and stress concentration• Post-processing consideration

• Understand results from optimization• Observe similarities• Identify primary and secondary load paths?• Cross sections geometries depending on

structural behaviour

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│14

Model Preparation

Concept Optimis.

ConceptInterpret.

ConceptDesign 5 6 7

Loadpath from topology iterations interpretated as CAD modelwith Solidthinking® Evolve.

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│15

Model Preparation

Concept Optimis.

ConceptInterpret.

ConceptDesign

DetailedOptimis. 6 7

Shear web could be replaced with cross members

Cross member could be discarded

• Many sections highlighted proved to be redundant after incorporating mounting interfaces.

• Findings from Loop2 topology iterations implemented in the new CAD

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│16

Model Preparation

Concept Optimis.

ConceptInterpret.

ConceptDesign

DetailedOptimis.

DetailedVerif. 7

Dynamic Verification

Static Strength Verification

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│17

Model Preparation

Concept Optimis.

ConceptInterpret.

ConceptDesign

DetailedOptimis.

DetailedVerif.

Additive Manf’

The parts printed from an EOS M400 from the company CITIM.

Material: AlSi10Mg (AA357-AA359 casting alloy)

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│18

Geometrical verification

Modal verification

Quasi-static load test

Sine vibration tests (3-dir.)

Random vibration tests (3-dir.)

Vibration Test

Geometrical verification

Modal verification

Quasi-static load test

Qualification Flight

Model Philosophy

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│19

Comparison of QM geometry with CAD model and identification of deviation.

Computer tomography scan with resolution of 320m

Verification

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│20

Test specimens were printed within the same print job as the two S1 AM brackets.

Verification

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│21

In-plane (XZ) low level sine sweep to verify the frequency requirement.

Frequency search spectrum

Frequency [Hz] Amplitude [g] Speed [oct/min] direction

5 to 2000 0.2 2 One sweep up

TEST RESULTS Predicted Measured

1st Eigen frequency (X) 90.0 Hz 91.4 Hz

2nd Eigen frequency (Z) 106.9 Hz 109.0 Hz -X

Z

X-response Z-response

Verification

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│22

Out-of-plane (Y) low level sine sweep to verify the frequency requirement.

Y

TEST RESULTS Predicted Measured

1st Eigen frequency 106.9 Hz 107.8 Hz

Verification

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│23

SG08: 282

SG09: 246

Strength verification under static, sine and random loading.

Qualification

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│24

Qualification

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│25

TopologyOptimisation

Design / Optimisation Manufacturing Verification / Testing

Functional analysis

Topology optimisation

CAD Interpretation

Size/Shape Optimisation

Detail Stressing

Optimisation

Post-Processing

Samples Definition

Process Control

Quality Control

Test Definition

Qualification Testing

Model Correlation

CAD Interpretation

Manufacturing Verification Testing

Additive Manufacturing Development Process

Main Challenges…

Acceptance of the technology by customers and authorities

Qualification and control of the materials and processes

Development of additive manufacturing technologies

Development of new engineering thinking

Development of new design tools

Acceptance

Qualification

Development

Development

Development

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│26

AM in Space…more than a hype!

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│27

"My goal is to have over 50% of the structures 3-D-printed within two to three years,"

Richard Ambrose, executive vice president ofDenver-based Lockheed Martin SpaceSystemsJul 24, 2014

Lockheed Martin Testing 3-D-Printed Subsystems On A2100 Space Bus | AWINONLY content from Aviation Week

Lockheed Martin Testing 3-D-Printed Subsystems On A2100Space Bus

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│28

Advanced Spacecraft Structures

3D-printed LVA RingLarge dimensions parts3D-printed LVA RingLarge dimensions parts

Full integration of metal tocompositeFull integration of metal tocomposite

3D-printed isogridcentral tube withintegrated interfaces

3D-printed isogridcentral tube withintegrated interfaces

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│29

Advanced Spacecraft Structures

Integrated high power 3D-printed heatpipesIntegrated high power 3D-printed heatpipes

Integrated metal coatedplastic 3D-printed wave-guides

Integrated metal coatedplastic 3D-printed wave-guides

Surface printedelectrical circuitsSurface printedelectrical circuits

Thermo-opticalsurface coatingThermo-opticalsurface coating

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│30

Advanced Spacecraft Structures

Lightweight 3D-printed brackets with adaptive stiffness and damping

Lightweight 3D-printed brackets with adaptive stiffness and damping

Thin plies CFRP sandwichwith ultralight 3D-printed core with anti-telegrahingfeature

Thin plies CFRP sandwichwith ultralight 3D-printed core with anti-telegrahingfeature

High efficiency 3D-printed solar cellsHigh efficiency 3D-printed solar cells

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│31

Advanced Spacecraft Structures

Thank you for your attention!

10.05.2015│RUAG Space│32

Franck MouriauxGeneral Manager Structures

RUAG Schweiz AGRUAG SpaceSchaffhauserstrasse 5808052 Zürich · Switzerland

Tel. +41 44 306 21 37Fax. +41 44 306 27 50Mobile: +41 78 709 56 [email protected]://www.ruag.com