motorsolve analysis of the 2010 toyota prius traction motor. · pdf filerotor punching...
TRANSCRIPT
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 1
MotorSolve analysis of the 2010 Toyota Prius Traction Motor.
Presented by: James R Hendershot
Location: Hilton Rosemont, Chicago O’Hare
Date: Oct. 27, 2015
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 2
Presenter:James R Hendershot
Jim has over 40 years experience in practical hands-on PM & SR brushless motor design, manufacturingand development. With past key employments at United Technologies, General Motors, Clifton Precision,Berger Lahr & Pacific Scientific, he has designed hundreds of brushless motors for computer disc drives,servo systems, high speed machine tool spindles, traction drives, hybrid vehicles, micro-turbine and dieselgenerators. He has written numerous technical papers, publications and presented tutorials on many different electric motor topics. Hendershot is the co-author with Professor TJE Miller for two of the leading design books on Permanent books on
Permanent Magnet Motor and Generator Design (ISBN 1-881855-03-1, 1994 & ISBN 978-0-9840687-0-8, 2010).
Jim teaches detailed motor design training courses (including workshops) at public venues, conferences and custom designed workshops tailored on-site for companies around the World. Jim Hendershot holds a B.S in Physics from Baldwin Wallace University in Berea Ohio along with additional E.E. & M.E. engineering studies at Cleveland State University as well as graduate courses at Case-Western University in Cleveland Ohio. He specializes in the design, analysis, sourcing, manufacturing and teaching of both electro-magnetic and permanent magnetic devices. In addition to continuing studies in magnetics and electric machines.
Jim has enjoyed a long and rich association with Dr. Tim Miller, founder of the SPEED Consortium at the University of Glasgow
combining Jim’s practical hands-on motor design skills with TIM’S theoretical knowledge and research
For the past few years Jim has also been associated with Infolytica Corp, Prof. Dave Lowther (of McGill University), Prof. Ernie Freeman retired from Imperial College, London and their staff for continued development and research involving the design and research for electric motors and generators.
Jim Hendershot developed a Dyno-Kit for teaching electric motor drives used by over 120 US Universities and Colleges for Prof. Ned Mohan of the University of Minnesota. These are used for the lab portion of their Electric Drive Courses.Jim Hendershot has created a series of 36 electric machine design lectures for the University of Minnesota, funded by the US Navy Research Labs that are available on YouTube. (9 to 10 hrs. of lectures covering all aspects of practical electric machine design).
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 3
For thousands of years man could only walk here and there.
By 4000 to 5000 BC man began to ride horses
Around 2000 BC horses were used to pull carts and carriages
Early US settlers used horse & oxen drawn large wagons to“go West” (Like modern RVs & campers)
In 1605 horse drawn carriages were used on the streets of London.
By 1640 the London horse drawn carriages added springsfor comfort and with a driver.
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 4
In the late 19th and early 20th century, electricity was the preferred power source for automobile propulsion. US had no highway systems because passenger trains were used for long distance travel.
Gasoline was known but no infrastructure available
Steam powered cars were also tried.
By 1920 thanks to Henry Ford, IC engine improvements and the growing petroleum infrastructure, thanks to John D Rockefeller, gasoline power dominated automobiles until this present day.
Introduction
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 5
History summary of automobile propulsion:
1768 French steam engine powered car by Nicolas Cugnot
1832 Robert Anderson ran first electric motor driven car
1885 Karl Benz made first 4 wheel gas powered car
1888 First noted (4) wheel E-Car, Flocken Elektrowagen
1893 First American car was developed by Charles Duryea
1897 Stanley Steamer in Newton MA, sold 200 cars
1908 Ford Model-T introduced (Internal combustion gasoline powered engine)
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 6
Early examples of E-Vs1888Flocken
1910POPE
1907Detroit
1912Edison
1918Woods
First lead-acid storage batteries developed in 1859Frenchmen namedGaston Planté
Limited gasoline availability andcars needed for only short trips.Trains used for long distances)
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 7
First (serious?) electric car since in nearly 100 years
EV1 by General Motors
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 8
EV1 by General Motors
Production years 1996 to 1999EV1s total produced total 1117 carsRange 70 to 90 miles per chargeMotor type, (3) phase aluminum rotor
AC induction motorMaximum output power = 103 kWPeak output torque = 149 NmBase speed = 6500 rpmMax speed = 13000 rpm
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 9
Toyota Motor Car Corp. EV or Hybrid development
Sometime in the middle 90s, Toyota began development of a hybrid electric vehicle to compete with the GM EV1.
First production in Japan in 1997 (before the EV1 was cancelled by GM in 2003.)
Toyota PRIUS first sold in the USA in 2003
Second generation PRIUS sold in USA in 2004
Third generation PRIUS sold in USA in 2010
Fourth generation PRIUS in USA scheduled for 2016
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 10
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 11
World hybrid Hybrid/EV sales 2003 to mid 2015
Total world production of hybrid or electric vehicles since 2003 = 3,540,199
Total world production of Toyota’s share = 2,487,564 ( 70%)
Total world production of Prius share = 1,731,717 (49%)
755,847 difference from other hybrid models designed & sold by Toyota such as, Camry, Avalon, Highlander & Lexus.
Hendershot 2015 Copyright12
Electric traction motor optionsfor hybrid and EV vehicles.
IM
RSM
IPM orSPM
Cross sections of electric machines by:
Switched Reluctance New rotor & stator
IM, RSM & IPM/SPM use similar stators &phase windings with different rotors
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 13
No matter which machine you choose for a motor/generatorits torque density is limited by two important magnetic materials.
1-Hard materials (permanent magnets) can only produce a maximum flux density of 1.4 tesla
2-Soft materials (electrical steels) become saturated at maximum flux densities in the range of 2.1 to 2.4 Tesla
I offer each of you a challenge to invent new materials
A new material with a negative permeability would be a good start, then higher temperature super conductivity materials
Maximum flux densities of materials limit performance
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 14
Specific power density of current piston engines, turbines & electric motors
Cooling and efficiency are very important for electric propulsion
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 15
Power density of modern EV traction motors
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 16
ELECTRIC MACHINE POWER DENSITY COMPARISONS
TESLA 4.5 kw/kg (225 kw peak for 30 sec.)New TESLA 4.34 kw/kgBMW i3 = 2.5 kw/kg (at 125 kw max)
Siemens 5 kw/kgAero PM motor(260 kw @ 50 kg)
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 17
Review of the Toyota Prius PM-AC traction motors
Toyota selected the PM-AC synchronous motor because it has the highest power density, highest power factor, highest efficiency and easiest to cool of any known electric machine. (Perhaps a bit more expensive than that other choices due to use of rare earth magnets.
However if AC Induction motors are used they must use copper rotors which increases their costs also. (The extra difficulty of rotor cooling and lower power factor tends to offset the magnet cost of the PM-AC machines.)
There are two types of PM-AC synchronous machines, SPM & IPM.
IPMs were chosen for several important reasons for automobile traction.Wide constant power speed range rangeRobust rotor without additional retainmentLower cost rectangular permanent magnets (no grinding required)Added reluctance torque output from same source current for magnet torque
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 18
Two types of PM-AC synchronous machines, SPM & IPM.
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 19
Prius 2003 IPM style (8 poles) Prius 2004 IPM style (8 poles)
The magnets & pole tops are retained against centrifugal forces by thin websat the magnet ends. Careful stress analysis is required as well as field solutionsto minimize flux leakage. (Said to be as high as 20 % leakage)
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 20
Toyota IPM rotor dimensions
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 21
Rotor Punching comparison for IPM Toyota electric traction motors
Actual Prius rotor punching has mass reduction pockets that also facilitate cooling. This can be modeled by importing a cad created rotor DXF file in MotorSolve or in MagNet.
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 22
2010 Toyota Prius PM generator12 slot, 8 IPM poles, V shaped
PM Generator rotor for 2004 Prius
PM Generator for 2010 Prius
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 23
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 24
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 25
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 26
Model (reverse engineer) 2010 TOYOTA PRIUS traction motor
1-Using Infolytica’s powerful electric motor template based Field Solver known asMOTORSOLVE, we can load the program, select motor type-Brushless DC motor,answer no to sizing question.
2-Select General Settings & fill out the input parameters taken from the data provided by ORNL on slides 23, 24 & 25.
3-Select Stator and fill in the required inputs also from the ORNL slide data
4-Then select Rotor and fill in the required inputs from the ORNL slides
5-Select Stator Windings and fill in the phase winding data from the ORNL slides
6-Select Materials and select both the electrical steel and the magnet grade from the list provided.
7-Solve for various performance Results, compare with ORNL test data & learn how to design these types of IPM PM-AC synchronous machines.
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 27
The input results, right side under General Settings, left side
Note: the cross section will not look like the one shownuntil after all rotor and stator inputs are complete
Input values fromORNL data
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 28
No rotor template is available that allows the creation of extra holes inside used for mass reduction and cooling. This can be createdusing CAD & imported as a .dxf file
Rotor IPM With variable orientation
Rotor IPM DXF imported
The open circuit air gap flux density can be compared
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 29
Stator inputs
Select:Stator (round) Input values from
ORNL data
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 30
Select:Rotor (with
variableorientation)
Input values fromORNL data
Setting the IPM rotor parameters
A long & careful study of web thickness, magnet width & orientationangle required to optimize the reluctance torque & magnet torque.
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 31
Typical total torque output of an IPM machineequals reluctance torque plus magnet torque
Peak torque @ angle = 36 deg.
PM torque function of magnet grade, Perm. Coef. & magnet areaReluctance torque function of salient pole width & Inductance ratio
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 32
Varying the web between magnetic poles from 1 to 8 mm
Critical design task for IPM design
Web thickness effects the saliency Lq& Ld ratio
Balance the magnet torque and the reluctance torque
Requires many tedious trial magnetic field solutions
As web gets larger, the magnet “V” angle increases.
There are many variations possible, such as multiple magnet layers &flux barriers.
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 33
D & Q axis torque plots of 2010 Prius motor
dq
Saliencywidth
I
6 deg. Madvance
30 deg. E optimum gamma angle for
max torque
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 34
Input values fromORNL data
Select:Stator (round)
Phase Winding layout
Note: This is a single layer winding (one coil side per slot).
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 35
Winding slot position list
Phase Windings are Selected based upon highest Winding Factor
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 36
Material selection, for shaft, magnets, stator core, rotor core & conductors
Select material choicesfrom those included in data bases or add new materials.
Select:Materials
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 37
Simulated back EMF (O.C.) @ 7200 rpm
The back emf can be simulated at any RPM setting.
This example is at 7200 RPM, the speed where the back EMF equals 650 VDC peak, or the same voltage as the DC rail voltage.
Without field weakening
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 38
Simulated back EMF (O.C.) @ 13,500 rpm
With no field weakening the back emf is about 1300VDC peak at 13,500 rpm. This means that Toyota used field weakening which can be modeled using a current advance angle.
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 39
Cogging torque simulation @ 100 rpm
Select:Cogging torque
Number of data point settings
Accuracy settingsIncrease from 1 default to 3
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 40
Open Circuit flux distribution
Note: High leakage flux in bridges & posts required for magnet retention
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 41
Simulated back EMF (O.C.) @ 1000 rpm
Select :Back EMF
From choice of phase& line Select:
Line, Phase
Slightly less than 100 V peak at 1Krpm
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 42
O.C. back emf with one stator slot skew (1000 rpm)
Under stator design, set skew to 7.5 (Deg.) and solve for Back EMF
Note: Slight skew (rotor or stator) shapes the line to line back EMF closer to a true sine wave reducing harmonics
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 43
Air gap flux plot with standard TOYOTA IPM rotor
Peak air gap flux ~ 0.8 TResult of leakage flux from IPM post & bridge
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 44
Post & bridge values set to zero to prevent leakage form magnet to magnet in rotor
O.C. flux plot with zero magnet to magnet leakage inside rotor
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 45
O.C. Back Emf plot with zero magnet to magnet leakage
At 1000 rpm & zero internal rotor leakage the peak back EMF has increased from 100 V to about 145 V
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 46
Peak air gap flux ~ 1.0 TWith zero leakage from IPM post & bridge.
This leakage represents 20% loss in flux linkage
O.C. air-gap flux plot with zero magnet to magnet leakage
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 47
Setup for simulation of torque including magnet & reluctance components
Select:PWM analysis
Select: Torque, Magnet & ReluctanceSet angles: 0, 90, 5
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 48
Torque vs Speed plots, 650 VDC, 0 advance and 45 deg. advance angles
Select:Torque vs. speed
Input:Advance angle 0, 45Speed, 100, 13500, 100
Note: generating region
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 49
Input:Advance angle 0, 45Speed, 100, 13500,
100Current reduced 25%
Torque vs Speed plots, 650 VDC, 0 advance and 35 deg. advance angles
Note: generating region
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 50
Torque vs RPM plots, 0 to 45 deg. Advance (650 VDC bus)
Note: With zero advance, 7200 rpm is max. speed attainable with 650 VDC.
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 51
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 52
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 53
2010 Toyota Prius 8 pole, 48 slot IPM machine
Thermal analysis byAdrian Perregaux
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 54
3D model for thermal analysis
Thermal analysis byAdrian Perregaux
Hendershot 2015 Copyright Adrian Perregaux
Output torque vs current (Toyota 2010 Prius)
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 56
2010 Toyota Prius cooling analysis by internal oil spray cooling
Thermal analysis byAdrian Perregaux
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 57
Peak flux distribution of Prius 2010 motor45 deg. advance1.92 T in teeth200 Nm150 A
Thermal analysis byAdrian Perregaux
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 58
Open circuit flux distribution of Prius 2010 motor
Thermal analysis byAdrian Perregaux
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 59
Temperature rise of key components @ 70% duty cycle
Thermal analysis byAdrian Perregaux
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 60
Simulated vs. measured temperature rise Deg. C vs. seconds
Thermal analysis byAdrian Perregaux
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 61
Efficiency Plot of 2010 Toyota Prius motor (Motorsolve)
Linearized efficiency plot for fast solution time
Select Efficiency and set up with parameters on right
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 62
Efficiency Plot of 2010 Toyota Prius motor (ORNL)
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 63
Efficiency Plot of 2010 Toyota Prius motor (Motorsolve)
Linearized efficiency plot (Takes about one hr. to solve)
Hendershot 2015 Copyright 64
ISBN 0-19-859389-9 ISBN 978-0-9840687-0-8RED BOOK GREEN BOOK