moving toward a dynamic system: developing a readiness...

49
Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Plan Melissa Gholson, Coordinator Office of Assessment and Accountability WVDE

Upload: others

Post on 11-Jul-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Moving toward a Dynamic

System: Developing a

Readiness Plan

Melissa Gholson,

Coordinator

Office of Assessment and Accountability

WVDE

Page 2: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Purpose for this session

• Update on the Dynamic Learning Maps

• Overview of the Common Core Standards and Essential ElementsStandards and Essential Elements

• How we are planning on getting ready?

• Accommodations

• Participation Guidelines and Assessment Updates

Page 3: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

What about Summative

Assessments?

�Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment)

�The Dynamic Learning Maps Consortium(Essential Elements and the Alternate Assessment)Alternate Assessment)

� Implementation 2014-2015

�Universally designed computer based assessments

http://www.k12.wa.us/SMARTER/

http://dynamiclearningmaps.org/

Page 4: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Technology Features

• Audio via sound files

• American Sign Language video

• Pop-up context-dependent dictionaries/glossaries

• Text and image magnification• Text and image magnification

• On-screen note taking

• Color overlays

• IntelliKeys™ keyboard accessibility

• Masking

• Text readers

Page 5: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Getting Ready for the Common

Core State Standards

http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards

Page 6: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

STANDARDS:The framework for Instruction and

Assessment

• How expectations for learners gets

defined

• The implications of the Common Core

• College/career readiness and • College/career readiness and

workforce training

• The linkage of the common core to

developing new “extended standards”

http://www.corestandards.org/

Page 7: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Grade Level Curriculum +

Expectations

= Linkage

Students with the most significant cognitive

disabilities:

• receive instruction on grade level extended

content standards (may be at a lower complexity content standards (may be at a lower complexity

level) within the context of grade level

curriculum ensuring that the intent of the grade

level content standard remains intact

• use the same materials, or adapted version of

the materials, and appropriate assistive

technology to gain access

Teaching Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities

Page 8: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

WVCSOs

ExtendedStandards

InstructionalPerformance/Achievement

AssessmentAchievement

Examplesprovide

teachers

understanding

of how to

instruct the

student

Current framework:

StandardsPerformance/Achievement

Level Descriptors

AssessmentAchievement

Level Descriptors

EXAMPLES

Page 9: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Navigating the Extended

Standards

Students

on APTA

Students on

Westest 2Performance

levels /activities

Page 10: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Access to the General Curriculum:A Continuum of LearningReading Language Arts

Grade 7-8

Standard for

Reading and

Literature:

Identify and

analyze

mythologies

from different Recognize that

an epic tale is

Identify

elements of

fiction in an

epic tale

from different

cultures

Example:

Student creates a

hero tale, using

epic tale

conventions (e.g.,

quest, special

weapons)

Respond to epic

tales read aloud by

selecting/drawing

pictures related to

the story

an epic tale is

fictional

Example:

Student reads (or

listens to) adapted

stories, and

categorizes each

as ‘make-believe’

or ‘real’

Example:

Student reads

an epic tale,

identifying

details related

to characters,

setting and

plot

Standard ‘as

written’Less Complex More Complex

‘Entry

Points’

Page 11: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Grade 7-8

Standard

for Algebra:

Solve

simple

algebraic

expressions

Solve simple

one- and two-

digit number

Access to the General

Curriculum:A Continuum of Learning(Mathematics)

11

expressions

for given

values

Example:

3a2 – b,

for a=3 & b=7

Match pictures

& objects to

create and

compare sets

Understand

symbols and

meaning of:

EXAMPLE:

* addition +

*subtraction -

* equal to =

digit number

sentences

Example:

1 + 1 + 1 = x

2 + x = 5

3x + 8 = 29

Standard ‘as

written’

‘Entry

Points’Less Complex

More Complex

Page 12: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Common Core State Standards

Instructional Assessm

Examples

of ways to

instruct

EssentialElements

InstructionalAchievement

Level Descriptors

Assessment

AchievementLevel

DescriptorsEXAMPLES

Page 13: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

GRADE SIX EXTENDED MATHEMATICS

WV CONTENT STANDARDS AND PERFORMANCE DESCRIPTORS

Mathematics Content Standards and Objectives

Grade Level Objectives Extended Grade Level Standards Performance Descriptors

M.O.6.5.1

collect, organize, display, read, interpret

and analyze real-world data using

appropriate graphs and tables (with and

without technology).

M.O.6.5.2

identify a real life situation using statistical

measures (mean, median, mode, range,

outliers) overtime, make a hypothesis as to

the outcome; design and implement a

method to collect, organize and analyze

data; analyze the results to make a

conclusion; evaluate the validity of the

MA.6.5.ES.1 collect, display and read data using appropriate graphs (pictorial, bar and line graphs).

MA.PD.6.5.ES.1Level IV students perform the following complex task without assistance:Student will: Interpret graphs. EX: Given a graph from a newspaper or magazine interpret information.

Level III students perform the following without assistance:Student will: Collect, display and read data using appropriate graphs (pictorial, bar and line graphs). EX: Conduct a simple survey. (What is your

.

Current WV

Extended

Mastery

conclusion; evaluate the validity of the

hypothesis based upon collected data,

design a mode of presentation using

words, graphs, models, and/or tables (with

and without technology).

M.O.6.5.3

perform simple probability events

using manipulatives; predict the

outcome given events using

experimental and theoretical

probability; express experimental

and theoretical probability as a

ratio, decimal or percent.

EX: Conduct a simple survey. (What is your favorite candy?) Record data. Create a bar graph. Compare findings-most, least, equal.

Level II students perform the following

with assistance:

Student will: Fill in bars on a graph.

EX: Given a piece of one inch grid paper,

color in a specified number of squares.

Level I students attempt to perform the

following with assistance:

Student will: Identify a bar graph.

EX: When given a choice between two

objects, choose a graph

Extended

Standards

Page 14: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Common Core Essential Elements

Sixth-Grade Math Standards

CCSS Grade-Level Clusters Common Core

Essential Elements

Instructional Achievement Level Descriptor

Understand ratio concepts and use

ratio reasoning to solve problems.

6.RP.1. Understand the concept of a ratio and use ratio language to describe a ratio relationship between two quantities. For example, “The ratio of wings to beaks in the bird house at the zoo was 2:1, because for every 2 wings there was 1 beak.” “For every vote candidate A received, candidate C received nearly three votes.”

6.RP.1. Use a ratio

to describe a

relationship.

Advanced AA Students will:

6.RP.1. Use a ratio to describe a relationship in

real world context.

Ex. Katie knows she can drive her car an average

of 30 miles while using 1 gallon of gasoline. Use

a ratio to describe the relationship between the

number of miles driven to gasoline used.

Proficient AA Students will: MASTERY

6.RP.1. Use a ratio to describe a relationship.

Ex. Use a pictorial representation to show part-

whole relationships

Future

Essential 6.RP.2. Understand the concept of a unit rate a/b associated with a ratio a:b with b ≠ 0, and use rate language in the context of a ratio relationship. For example, “This recipe has a ratio of 3 cups of flour to 4 cups of sugar, so there is 3/4 cup of flour for each cup of sugar.” “We paid $75 for 15 hamburgers, which is a rate of $5 per hamburger.”1

6.RP.3. Use ratio and rate reasoning to solve real-world and mathematical problems, e.g., by reasoning about tables of equivalent ratios, tape diagrams, double number line diagrams, or equations.

whole relationships

Below Proficient AA Students will:

6.RP.1. Identify or demonstrate a ratio

relationship.

Ex. Set a table where each place setting has

three pieces of silverware for every plate

Novice AA Students will:

6.RP.1. Identify a one to one relationship.

Identify one related item to a concept.

Ex. Given the job of filling the soda machine,

identify which item in the set fits in the machine

(i.e. soda can vs. milk carton).

Essential

Element

Page 15: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

60

70

80

90

APTA Mastery & Above 72 %

Results APTA 2011

(but 2015 results?)

71

75

83

68 6974

7965 69

77

67

78 78 81

0

10

20

30

40

50

3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 11th

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Grade

Math

Lang Arts

Science69

63

62

Page 16: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Implications

• Expectations

• Instruction and the need for

professional development

• Resource required• Resource required

• Accountability and ESEA

• How do we determine where we go

from here?

Page 17: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

How many are we alternate

assessing?

• We are currently

assessing 1.41% of

all students using

the alternate

assessment.

Grade Percent of Population

3 1.43

4* 1.47

assessment.

• Future

implications?

5 1.31

6 1.41

7 1.29

8 1.40

11 1.56

* Largest growth from last year

Page 18: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

WESTEST2 Characteristics Please mark an “X” along the continuum

that best describes your student.

APTA Characteristics

The student demonstrates varied levels of cognitive abilities and adaptive skills

and may or may not need close adult supervision; a wide array of related or

intensity of services and a modified curriculum.

The student demonstrates significant impairment of cognitive abilities and

adaptive skills, which results in comprehensive needs and generally require

intense adult supervision.

All students participate in state assessments. The Individualized Education Program (IEP) team determines how each student with a disability will participate. WESTEST2 is the

appropriate assessment for most students with disabilities. Students with significant impairment of cognitive abilities and adaptive skills whose performance cannot be adequately

assessed through WESTEST 2, even with accommodations, may be considered for APTA. The IEP team, including parents and the student when appropriate, should carefully consider

the life-long consequences of this decision. The assessment decision, even in the early grades, affects the student’s opportunity to learn the general curriculum, skills preparation and

future ability to earn a diploma. A student moved from the general curriculum (Content Standards and Objectives) and assessment (WESTEST2) to APTA will face major challenges if

the team later wishes to reverse the decision. The decision to place a student on APTA is NOT based solely on only one of the following factors: excessive absences or lack of instruction;

sensory, physical, emotional or learning disabilities; the student’s IQ; social, cultural, linguistic or economic differences. Significant physical and motor disabilities should not influence

the assessment decision.

Making Sound Assessment Decisions

Present levels indicate that the student is working toward core content

academic areas in the CSOs with or without supports (pre-teach, re-teach, co-

teaching, differentiated instruction).

Present levels indicate that the student is working toward Alternate Academic

Achievement Standards (extended standards).

With or without extended learning opportunities and significant instructional

modifications, the student is capable of attaining the WV CSOs.

The student requires a markedly modified curriculum with a focus on basic or

functional academics.

The student is instructed and takes test in large and small group settings and in

the classroom with or without allowable accommodations.

The student requires close or continuous adult assistance during instruction and

test situations.

Transition services focus or will likely focus on postsecondary opportunities

that will lead to college, technical training or employment and will most likely

conclude by 18.

Transition services focus or will focus on postsecondary opportunities such as

activities of daily living, adult services and/or long term supported employment

and will most likely conclude by age 21.

The student has participated in the WESTEST for 2 or more years. (Do not

mark if NA)

The student has participated in the APTA for 2 or more years. (Do not mark if

NA)

The student is able to acquire, maintain and generalize age appropriate

concepts via research based instructional approaches.

The student requires a large number of repetitive trials or opportunities to

demonstrate skills and significant support for learning and concept maintenance

across all environments.

When all characteristics are viewed as one, which side of the dotted line best describes the student?

Page 19: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Diploma Ramifications

Modified Diploma:

Policy 2510: Assuring Quality of Education: Regulations for Education Programs states that county boards of education shall

award a standard diploma, to students who complete graduation requirements. The Policy also introduces a modified diploma

which is defined as a “formal documentation and recognition that

an eligible student with disabilities, who is unable to meet the graduation requirements for a standard diploma, has met the

modified diploma requirements specified on the student’s

Individualized Education Program.”

Students with disabilities who have been determined by an IEP

Team to be unable, even with extended learning opportunities and significant instructional modifications, to meet state and

county standard graduation requirements may receive a modified diploma. All students who meet the criteria for the Alternate

Performance Task Assessment (APTA) are presumed to be

pursuing a modified diploma.

IEP Team Decision

3. Does the student have significant impairment of cognitive

abilities and adaptive skills that may require instruction in the WV AAAS?

• If yes, the student is eligible for a modified diploma

• If no, the IEP Team needs to reconsider Question 2 and

revise the IEP to better meet the needs of the student

The determination of the student’s eligibility for a modified or

standard diploma and the student’s progress toward this goal is

to be reviewed annually by the IEP Team.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: Does the United States Military accept students who have earned a modified diploma?

Answer: An applicant who possesses a local or state-issued

diploma on the basis of an attendance credential (non-standard diploma) is not to be considered a Tier I high school graduate in

the Navy, Army and Marine Corps. Over 90% of enlistees are

In response to questions from the field, the RESAs and WVDE are collaborating to provide information related to modified diplomas and assessment decisions.

May 2010

IEP Team Decision

Policy 2510 requires the IEP team to develop an Individualized

Student Transition Plan (ISTP) that begins in grade 9 selecting the career cluster and pathway, which is the basis for scheduling

courses for grades 9-12. At the same time the decision regarding type of diploma is made for students with disabilities. Additionally,

Policy 2419 requires a student at age 14 and older taking APTA to

be working toward a modified diploma. Students and families

must be fully aware of the impact and implications regarding this decision.

Note: “Modified standards” identified in WVDE Policy 2510,

Section 5.6.10 is not currently applicable.

IEP Team Procedures

The IEP team must carefully review the most recent summative

and formative assessment data on the student. In addition, it

must examine the student's past history and future expectations on the West Virginia Measures of Academic Performance (WV

MAP).

Based upon review of the data, the IEP Team must carefully consider the following questions:

1. Is the student capable of attaining the West Virginia Content

Standards and Objectives (WV CSOs)?

• If yes, the student is eligible for a standard diploma

• If no, proceed to next question

2. Is the student capable of attaining the WV CSOs with

instructional modifications and accommodations (pre-teach, re-teach, specialized instructional strategies, differentiated

instruction, co-teaching, instructional technology, etc.)

• If yes, the student is eligible for a standard diploma

• If no, proceed to next question

the Navy, Army and Marine Corps. Over 90% of enlistees are Tier I which greatly reduces the chances of enlistment in these

branches. It is also important to note that ALL branches of the military require a minimum score of 50 on the Armed Forces

Qualifying Test (AFQT). Note: Eligibility requirements may change

due to the needs of the United States Department of Defense, so students and their parents should check with recruiters to

determine if a modified diploma is currently being accepted.

Question: Can a student with a modified diploma be accepted

into a college?

Answer: Most four year universities do not accept a modified

diploma. A limited number of remedial level community college courses are available to students with a modified diploma;

however, they are not applicable towards the completion of a degree. Most colleges and universities have minimal score

requirements for the SAT or ACT.

Question: Are students who receive a modified diploma eligible

for federal or state financial aid at a post secondary institution?

Answer: Students who receive a modified diploma are not eligible for federal financial aid. Limited state and private

financial aid and scholarships may be available on an individual

basis.

Question: Can a student earning a modified diploma participate

in the high school graduation ceremony?

Answer: Yes. It is recommended that the student only

participate in the graduation ceremony during the final year of school.

Question: Can a student working toward a modified diploma

continue public education to age 21?

Answer: Any student with an IEP remains entitled to a Free

Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) through the age of 21 until

the student graduates with a standard high school diploma or reaches age 21. A student earning a modified diploma may exit

prior to age 21 if the IEP team and adult agency develop an

appropriate adult plan.

Page 20: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Monitor Placement

• Development of county APTA Monitoring Checklist

• Students assessed by APTA must be primarily instructed on Extended StandardsExtended Standards

• Involvement of County Leadership Teams– County Special Education Directors

– County Test Coordinators• IEP Team Leadership and Monitoring

• Follow Participation Guidelines

• Educate staff

20

Page 21: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

How can my district prepare for

2015?• Focus on professional development in the area of common

core standards and instruction, assistive technology and specific technologies that meet the unique learning needs of the individual student.

• Continue participation with the T1 Project which has identified a variety of technologies that individualize learning for students with disabilities. The project includes a commitment to best practices and achieving minimum technology requirements for practices and achieving minimum technology requirements for all classrooms. For more information about T1 http://wvde.state.wv.us/osp/T1.html

• Utilize the APTA practice tests available in three formats: paper/pencil that simulates the current assessment ; Boardmaker, a software platform designed for students who have accessibility needs such as switches or touch screen monitors, adaptive keyboards or mouse, and; ACUITY has the capacity to document a student’s progress over time. APTA practice items are located at https://sites.google.com/a/wvde.k12.wv.us/oaar-file-cabinet/apta-1

Page 22: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

IDEA 2004

Access to…

Progress in….

General Education Curriculum

Almost 30 years of research and experience has demonstrated that the education of children with disabilities can be made more effective by having high expectations and ensuring access to the general education curriculum in the regular classroom, to the maximum extent possible…

Page 23: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Let’s Talk More About

Accommodations and Issues of

Access to the General

Curriculum• 4% of the general population or about 40% of

students served under IDEA can benefit from accessible instructional materialsaccessible instructional materials

• In WV about 300 students are currently identified. This means we are under serving a possible 16, 198 students.

• In WV the most frequent presentation accommodation is read aloud.

• Assessment accommodations should be aligned to instructional accommodations or services.

• If you conducted an IEP audit what would you find?

Page 24: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Accommodations Data

Page 25: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Accommodations by Primary

Exceptionality

Page 26: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

How do we provide Accessible

Instructional Materials for

students?

• Identify students who qualify for print disabilities. Many services are available free for students who qualify at no cost to the district.

• Use these resources:

http://wvde.state.wv.us/osp/accessiblematerials.hhttp://wvde.state.wv.us/osp/accessiblematerials.html

http://aim.cast.org/

http://www.cast.org/index.html

http://www.udlcenter.org/

www.Bookshare.org

http://www.learningally.org/

Page 27: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Implement Technology UDL

Supports

Screen-reading tools that offer supports for vocabulary, note taking, and self-questioning or comprehension monitoring. These tools were designed originally to support readers and originally to support readers and writers with visual impairments or learning disabilities, and they offer important supports to students with significant intellectual disabilities as well.

Page 28: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

WHY MONITOR

ACCOMMODATIONS?

Page 29: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Monitoring is a Requirement

• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)

• Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)

• Expectations from federal peer review processes for aligned systems

• Expectations for improving student outcomes

Page 30: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Regulations for

Accommodations MonitoringThe Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) provides

federal support for services for students with disabilities. One of the eligibility requirements for states to receive federal funds under Part B of IDEA is:

PARTICIPATION IN ASSESSMENTS

(A) IN GENERAL—All children with disabilities are

included in all general State and district wide assessment included in all general State and district wide assessment programs, including assessments described under section 1111 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, with appropriate accommodations and alternate assessments where necessary and as indicated in their respective individualized education programs.

(B)ACCOMMODATION GUIDELINES—The State (or, in the case of a district wide assessment, the local educational agency) has developed guidelines for the provision of appropriate accommodations. [Sec. 612 (a) (16)].

Page 31: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Monitoring is important for

Improving Outcomes

Monitoring is an important

component of improving outcomes

for students with disabilities.

Systematic attention to the provision Systematic attention to the provision

of accommodations can ensure that

students are able to show what they

know and can do.

Page 32: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

5 Steps to Monitoring

Accommodations

1. Know the rules and regulations for accommodations monitoring

2. Document decisions about accommodations

3. Document the use of accommodations

4. Review accommodations decisions and their use

5. Evaluate and report on accommodations

Page 33: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

HOW DO WE MONITOR

ACCOMMODATIONS?

Page 34: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Participation Guidelines

• Purpose of the guidelines is to

provide policy guidance for

determining the appropriate

assessments and

accommodations for all

students.

• Guidelines are referenced by • Guidelines are referenced by

Policies 2340, West Virginia

Measures of Academic

Progress; 2419, Regulations for

the Education of Students with

Exceptionalities; and 2417,

Programs of Study for Limited

English Proficiency Students.

Page 35: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Changes for 2011-2012

• Change in the WVS.326 Process of

accommodations provision and

monitoring

• Defined code and accommodations • Defined code and accommodations

information

• Updated summary sheet

• Focus on provision of appropriate

accommodations

Page 36: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Accommodations Code Summary

Page 37: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Code Specific InformationP02 Have test read aloud verbatim

Allowed for: All WV-MAP tests except WESTEST 2 RLA and Online Writing and

NAEP Reading. (Note: To have directions, passage, and prompt read aloud

for Online Writing, use P26.)

Description: A trained examiner reads aloud the entire test, including directions,

stimulus material, questions, and answer choices. Graphic materials may be

described but also should be made available in print or tactile formats.

When to select: For students with a reading disability, unable to decode text When to select: For students with a reading disability, unable to decode text

visually or by using contracted braille or Nemeth code.

Notes for implementation: Best practices call for readers to be provided to

students on an individual basis—not to a group of students. A student

should have the option of asking a reader to slow down or repeat text. This

is difficult when a person is reading to an entire group of students.

However, verbatim reading to a group of students is permitted in testing if

the accommodation is provided to the student on that basis during

instruction. Test readers must be familiar with the terminology and symbols

specific to the content (see Appendix K on page 75); answer or help

eliminate some answer choices…

Page 38: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Role of IEP, Section 504 and

LEP Committees• IEP, LEP and Section 504 Committee’s shall not

exempt any student from participation in state assessments.

• IEP, LEP and Section 504 Committee’s shall determine the appropriate accommodations.

• The student must receive all assessment accommodations as outlined in the IEP, LEP or accommodations as outlined in the IEP, LEP or Section 504 Plan.

• All assessment accommodations decisions should be made and implemented with integrity prior to the assessment.

• Accommodations for assessment should be consistent with those received during instruction.

38

Page 39: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

IEP Form Documentation

39

Page 40: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Documentation of Assessment

40

Page 41: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Online IEP Accommodations

Video

http://wvde.state.wv.us/osp/onlineIEPupdate.html

Page 42: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

The WVS.326 Monitoring

Process• The new 326 form will be provided for all

required state and district assessments

• One form will be provided for each student who should receive accommodations.

• Electronic information will help us collect • Electronic information will help us collect data to support better student outcomes

• The accommodations data will inform our accommodations policies and research.

• WVS.326 Process also provides IEP, 504 and LEP teams feedback on accommodations provision.

Page 43: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Form 326

Electronic Monitoring Process

Accommodations selected must match current IEP, LEP

or 504 plan.

Page 44: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

WVS.326 Accommodations FormRequired accommodations to be provided may be

highlighted here.

Page 45: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

What to do about students who do not

receive accommodations?All incidents for failing to provide an accommodation requires written

documentation.

• The CTC will review accommodation breaches with principals/building level coordinators and report any findings to the Special Education, Title III and or 504 director(s) and to the Office of Assessment and Accountability.

• If a student has been denied accommodations listed within the IEP, 504 or LEP plan, there has been a breach in the integrity/accuracy of test results. Therefore, the CTC or county special education director should contact the principal who integrity/accuracy of test results. Therefore, the CTC or county special education director should contact the principal who must inform the parent/guardian of the testing administration breach and provide the following options:

o Test is invalidated and the student is retested using a breach form (if the testing window is still open).

o Test is scored.

o Test is invalidated and student receives a score of ―0.

If the second or third option is selected—there must be a signed written agreement between the parent/guardian and principal/building level coordinator. Copies of the agreement must be kept on file with the CTC/county special education director, Section 504 director, or Title III director.

Page 46: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Maintaining Data

Electronic copies of these reports

must be maintained by the district,

for review by the Office of Education

Performance Audits, Office of Performance Audits, Office of

International Schools, and the Office

of Special Programs.

Page 47: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Resources

• Read Outloud 6:www.donjohnston.com/readoutloud

• The T1 Project:

http://sites.google.com/site/seteachers1/

• The APTA Practice Tests & Participation Guidelines

https://sites.google.com/a/wvde.k12.wv.us/oaar-file-cabinet/apta-1

• Accessible Instructional Materials• Accessible Instructional Materials

http://wvde.state.wv.us/osp/accessiblematerials.html

http://aim.cast.org/

http://www.cast.org/index.html

http://www.udlcenter.org/

www.Bookshare.org

http://www.learningally.org/

Page 48: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic

Thank You

Melissa Gholson, Coordinator

[email protected]

Page 49: Moving toward a Dynamic System: Developing a Readiness Planwvde.state.wv.us/osp/Fall2011LeadershipConference_Gholson.pdf · Smarter Balance Consortia (General Assessment) The Dynamic