mpd assessment and rating
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
1/39
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
2/39
Knowledge 15%
Process or Skills 25%
Understanding(s) 30%
Products/Performance 30%
100%
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
3/39
The levels are defined as follows:
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
4/39
The levels are defined as follows:
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
5/39
The levels are defined as follows:
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
6/39
traditional assessments
Alternative assessments
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
7/39
- are tests given to students to measure how
much the students have learned-
- contain different types of questions such a
multiple-choice, true-false, fill-ins, essays,
sentence completions, matching response,etc.
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
8/39
b.Alternative Assessment
Observation
Student journals
Performance assessment
Project and investigation
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
9/39
b.Alternative Assessment
Open-ended questions
Student portfolio
Interview
Role Play
Checklist
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
10/39
At the end of the quarter the performance of students shallbe described based on the following levels of proficiency:
Beginning (B)
Developing (D)
Approaching Proficiency (AP)
Proficient (P)
Advanced (A)
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
11/39
Beginning The students at this level struggles with
his/her understandings; prerequisite and fundamental
knowledge and/or skills have not been acquired or
developed adequately to aid understanding.
Developing The student at this level possesses the
minimum knowledge and skills and core
understandings, but needs help throughout the
performance of authentic tasks
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
12/39
Approaching Proficiency The student at this level
has developed the fundamental knowledge and skills
and core understandings and, with little guidance
from the teacher and/or with some assistance from
peers, can transfer these understandings through
authentic performance tasks
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
13/39
Proficient The student at this level has developed
the fundamental knowledge and skills and core
understandings and, can transfer them
independently through authentic performance tasks.
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
14/39
Advanced The student at this level exceeds the
core requirements in terms of knowledge, skills and
understandings and, and can transfer them
automatically and flexibility through authentic
performance tasks.
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
15/39
Indicators Beginning Developing ApproachingProficiency
Proficient Advanced
Acquisition of
Knowledge,
Skills and
Understandings
Struggling or
have not
acquired
Minimum Fundamental Fundamental Exceeding
Transfer of
knowledge/
Application of
Knowledge
Needs help With little guidance
from the teacher or
some assistance
from peers
Independent Automatic and
flexible
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
16/39
Level of Proficiency Equivalent Numerical Value
Beginning (B) 74% and below
Developing (G) 75-79%
Approaching Proficiency (AP) 80-84%
Proficient (P) 85-89%
Advanced (A) 90% and above
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
17/39
Suggested assessment tools
1. Selected-response Item provide several response
options to the students, and the student selects from
among the options.
a. Multiple Choice Test
b. True of False
c. Matching type
(Testing to Learn-Learning to test by Joanne Capper page 45)
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
18/39
Suggested assessment tools
2. Constructed response type of test ask the student to
create or construct a response. It can be used to
determine if the pupils knowledge of facts is of
sufficient, breadth and depth. A rubric of scoring guideis necessary.
a. Multiple Choice Test
b. True of False
c. Matching type
(Testing to Learn-Learning to test by Joanne Capper page 45)
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
19/39
The focus is how pupils construct meanings or makessense of the facts and information.
Outlining, organizing, analyzing, interpreting,
translating, converting, or expressing the information inanother format ;
Drawing analogies
Constructing graphs, flowcharts, and maps or
graphic organizers
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
20/39
Transforming a textual presentation into a diagram.
Drawing or painting pictures
Doing role plays
Written Test
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
21/39
a. Oral Discourse/Recitation
Explain/justify something based on facts/data,
phenomena or evidence
Tell/retell stories
Make connections of what was learned within and
across learning areas
Apply what has been learned in real life situation
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
22/39
b. Portfolio
Collection of evidence like images, anecdotes etc.
to demonstrate mastery and interpretation of agiven set of concepts.
c. Open-ended tests
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
23/39
Participation (e.g in group activities/projects)
Projects
Homework
Portfolio
Other Outputs.
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
24/39
There shall be one rating for MAPEH which is the
average of the four components
Example:
Music 84 AP
Art 88 P
P.E. 90 A
Health 89 P
351/4 = 87.75
Round to 88.00 P
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
25/39
Assessment of Oral Fluency in Filipino and English
shall also be at four (4) levels. Knowledge (15%),
Process/Skills (25%), Understandings (30%) andProduct/Performance (30%)
Oral test shall be given with corresponding rubrics.
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
26/39
Examples of Activities/Oral Tests for Assessing Oral Fluency
(Using Rubrics)
Retelling Personal Stories
Retelling Stories
Role playing a Dialogue
Storytelling by Turns
Spotting Differences and Similarities
Interview
My Favorite cartoon Character
Other oral Test
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
27/39
Since MT is a language subject, its assessment follows
the four levels of assessment with its corresponding weight
and the level of proficiency as indicated in DO No. 31 s.2012. MT should not be treated as a different or distinct
subject from the rest of the subjects.
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
28/39
The class adviser and other subjects area teachershandling the class shall give the non-numerical rating for
behavior observations for every rating period. The class
adviser then gets the average of these non-numerical
rating and shall reflect in the report card. The non-numerical ratings to be used are:
A Very Good
B Good
C Fair
D Poor
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
29/39
Quizzes shall be summed up to 100 total points which is
equivalent to 100%. It total points for quizzes is below 100
points, divide the total score of an individual pupil by the
total number of items to get the percent equivalent (or the
Achievement rate)
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
30/39
For periodic test, total points may also be 100. If total
number of items is below 100, divide the raw score of an
individual pupil by the total number of items to get the
percent equivalent (Achievement Rate)
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
31/39
Rubrics shall be utilized for rating individual or group
participation, projects, performances etc.
(Teachers are encouraged to prepare their own rubrics)
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
32/39
The Final Grade for each Learning area shall be reportedas the average of the four quarterly numerical ratings and
to be expressed in terms of the levels of proficiency.
Example: First Grading 88
Second Grading 90
Third Grading 91
Fourth Grading 92
261 / 4 = 90.25
Round to 90.00 (A) Advanced
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
33/39
The General Average shall be the average of the final
grades of the different learning areas, also expressed in
terms of levels of proficiency with the numerical equivalent
in parenthesis.
Example: P (89.00)
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
34/39
Rounding numbers to the nearest whole numbers is
applied when computing for the rating of each learning
area for a quarter or grading period, final rating for each
learning area and general average
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
35/39
Rounding numbers to the nearest hundredths is applied
when computing for the following for purposes of
ranking/selection of honor pupils:
Final Rating for each learning area
General Average
(In case when there are ties, rounding can be made to
the nearest thousandths or ten thousandths.)Separate guidelines for selection of honor pupils shall be
issued.
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
36/39
Like those in the Advanced, Proficient and Approaching
Proficiency, pupils in the Developing (D) level of
proficiency as the general average, shall be promoted to
the next grade level.
Appropriate intervention is necessary for those in the
Developing Level.
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
37/39
Pupils at the Beginning (B) Level of proficiency during a
specific quarter for any learning area, shall be provided
with immediate and appropriate intervention in order to
cope with the rest of the class.
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
38/39
Pupils who is at the Beginning (B) Level of Proficiency as
the general average after a school year, despite the
interventions provided, shall take summer classes in the
learning areas where he/she needs help, otherwise he/she
will be retained in the same grade level during the next
school year.
-
7/31/2019 Mpd Assessment and Rating
39/39