ms 03 soil water content

Upload: jlampur2413

Post on 14-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 MS 03 Soil Water Content

    1/13

    ETSEA

    Soil Water Content

    Jorge Lampurlans ([email protected])Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    ETSEA

    Soil Water Content Measurement

    Thermogravimetric Method Neutron ProbeTime Domain Reflectometry (TDR) Capacitance Method

    Frequency Domain Reflectometry (FDR) Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) From soil water potential

    ETSEAThe Water in Soil

    Soil Water Content:

    Gravimetric basis: [g water/g water]

    Volumetric basis: [m3 water/ m3 water]

    Related by bulk density: [g soil/ m3 soil]

    =

    On the soil profile: W [m3 water/ m2 water]

    W = i zi (zi, soil depth in mm)

    3Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    ETSEA

    4Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    The Water in Soil

  • 7/30/2019 MS 03 Soil Water Content

    2/13

    ETSEA

    Lysmeter

    5Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    The Water in SoilETSEA

    Lysimeter

    6Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    The Water in Soil

    ETSEA

    Lysimeter

    7Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    The Water in SoilETSEA

    Soil Water Balance

    Equations

    Complete: ET = Wi + [P + I +Re] - [Rl + D] - Wf Simplified: ET = W i + P - Wf

    I+Re RlP

    W i W f

    D

    ET

    8Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    The Water in Soil

    ET: EvatopranpirationW: Soil Water Content (inicial, final)

    P: PrecipitationI: IrrigationR: Surface Runoff (entering, leaving)

  • 7/30/2019 MS 03 Soil Water Content

    3/13

    ETSEAThermogravimetric Method

    PRINCIPLE

    Soil water content definition: the water that may beevaporated from a soil by heating between 100 y 110 C(105 C) until there is no further weight loss.

    9Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    ETSEAThermogravimetric Method MATERIAL & METHODS

    Soil sampling (50 to 100 g of soil): auger (hand operated)

    10Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Edelman Riverside Stony soil

    ETSEAThermogravimetric Method MATERIAL & METHODS

    Soil sampling (50 to 100 g of soil): auger (soil column cylinder auger)

    11Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    ETSEAThermogravimetric Method MATERIAL & METHODS

    Soil sampling (50 to 100 g of soil): auger (soil column cylinder auger)

    12Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

  • 7/30/2019 MS 03 Soil Water Content

    4/13

    ETSEAThermogravimetricThermogravimetric MethodMethod MATERIAL & METHODS

    Soil sampling (50 to 100 g of soil): auger (hydraulic drive)

    hermetic containers (plastic pots)

    13Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    ETSEAThermogravimetric Method MATERIAL & METHODS

    Soil water evaporation at 105 C until constant weight(weight change in 0,5 to 4 hours < 0,1% of the initialweight): 24 to 48 hours. Forced air oven Laboratory balance

    14Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    ETSEA

    WARNINGSAt 110 C not all water removed

    T > 110 C organic mater oxidation

    T > 80 C gypsium hydratation water lost

    CALCULATIONS = (MwetMdry)/Mdry

    STONY SOILS: = (

  • 7/30/2019 MS 03 Soil Water Content

    5/13

    ETSEANeutron Probe PRINCIPLE

    H slows down fast neutrons (thermalization)

    Most H in soil is in soil water

    Changes in soil H Changes in water content

    [Thermalized Neutrons] = f(t)

    17Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    ETSEANeutron Probe PRINCIPLE

    Calibration: = R/R s a + b

    : Volumetric water contentR: Neutron count rate in soilRs: Count rate in a standard medium (Water)R/Rs: Count-rate ratioa y b: Calibration constants

    18Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    ETSEANeutron Probe MATERIAL & METHODS

    Access Tubes Aluminium, brass, stainless steel, plastic.

    Transparency to neutrons (not PVC).

    Mechanical strength.

    Resistance to corrosion.

    Stoppers to seal the top and end pieces to close the botton.

    Access Tube Installation Minimize dirturbance to the soil, soil surface and vegetation to obtain

    truly representative measurements of the area

    Acces tube fit tightly into the soil to prevent voids and channeling ofwater dow besides it.

    19Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    ETSEA

    MATERIAL & METHODS Neutron probe

    Prove (Sourve & Detector)

    Prove cable (strong, waterproof,with stoppers)

    Stable power supply (1-2 kV)

    Counter unit (8 to 64 s)

    Prove carrier (limits radiation)

    20Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Neutron Probe

  • 7/30/2019 MS 03 Soil Water Content

    6/13

    ETSEA

    WARNINGS

    Sphere of importance Decreases with soil water content

    (0.15 m in wet soil0.5 in very dry soil)

    Depth increments > 0.1 m

    Smoot water content profile

    Total profile water content: OK

    Errors at the soil surface(< 0.15-0.30 m)

    21Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Neutron Probe ETSEAWARNINGS

    Random Counting Errors Increase the counting time (64 s)

    Weekly standard counts (1 hour, in water)

    Need of site-specific calibration Presence of strong neutron absorbers: iron, chlorine

    Bulk density increases count rate specially in wet conditions

    Marked textural boundaries

    Stones

    Access tubes

    22Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Neutron Probe

    ETSEA

    FIELD CALIBRACINTake soil samples (water content determination)

    during the excavation for the access tube installation. Record neutron counts at the required depths.

    Determine volumetric water content of the samplesthermogravimetrically.

    Repeat at different access tubes when the soil is atdifferent water contents (drying, irrigation).

    Take undisturbed samples of known volume near theaccess tube at the same depths.

    23Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Neutron Probe ETSEA FIELD CALIBRATION

    24Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Neutron Probe

  • 7/30/2019 MS 03 Soil Water Content

    7/13

    ETSEA

    Commercial neutron probes: Troxler 3% (Troxler) (Cambell Pacific)

    25Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Neutron Probe ETSEAMethods based on K PRINCIPLE

    Include de moist soil as part of the dielectric of a capacitor and

    measure its capacitance that gives the dielectric constant (K) orrelative permittivity ():

    capacitance with soil

    capacitance with air

    K is frequency (F) dependent: F < 30 MHz: proportion and configuration of air filled pores

    F between 30-3.000 MHz K = f(water, soil, air)

    (Kwater 80, Ksoil 3-5, Kair= 1) F > 3000 MHz: water dipoles do not follow the electromagnetic fields

    K = =

    26Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    ETSEA

    PRINCIPLE

    27Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Methods based on K ETSEA METHODS

    TDR (Time Domain Reflectometry): measurement of

    the travel time of and electromagnetic wide range highfrequency pulse (step voltage) through the soil.

    Frequency Domain (FD)fixed low frequency (around 100 MHz) Capacitance: measurement of the capacitance of the soil.

    FDR (Frequency Domain Reflectometry): Measurement ofthe complex impedance.

    WARNINGS Measurement of free water only

    28Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Methods based on K

  • 7/30/2019 MS 03 Soil Water Content

    8/13

    ETSEATime Domain Reflectometry (TDR) PRINCIPLE

    The propagation velocity of an electromagnetic wave down atransmission line in a nonmagnetic medium (soil) is related

    with the dielectric constant (K) or permittivity () of themedium

    A high-frequency electromagnetic pulse is fed into the soilbetween two metal rods. Part of the pulse is reflected back upthrough the soil from the bottom of the rods, and the time

    interval between the incident and reflected pulses is measured.

    If Kv t

    K

    cv =

    29Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    t

    Lv

    2=

    (c = 3108 m/s)

    ETSEATime Domain Reflectometry (TDR) PRINCIPLE

    30Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    2

    2

    =

    L

    tcK

    2

    tcLAB =

    2

    =

    L

    LK AB

    K

    cv =

    t

    Lv

    2=

    ETSEA

    MATERIAL & METHODS Different proves (transmission lines)

    31Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) ETSEA MATERIALS & METHODS

    Transmission line or wave guide Coaxial Cable 50 (no more than 2 m)

    2 to 3 rigid parallel metallic rodsinserted into the soil Rod diameter: 3 - 5 mm.

    Rod spacing 1.5 - 10 cm(Rod spacing / Rod diameter < 10).

    Rod length: 5 - 50 cm (attenuation).

    Vertically or horizontally inserted.

    Avoid rod to soil air gaps(rods diameters as large as possible).

    Parallelism is important forconductivity measurements.

    32Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR)

  • 7/30/2019 MS 03 Soil Water Content

    9/13

    ETSEA

    MATERIAL & METHOS Cable tester (Tectronyc 1502C)

    Wave Form Analysis: beginning and end of thetransmission line (manual or automatic)

    33Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) ETSEA

    WARNINGS Signal attenuation in saline soils by ionic conduction

    Insulation of the central rod.

    Bulk Electrical Conductivity measurement:

    34Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR)

    app

    f

    f

    u

    s

    RZ

    KmS

    +

    =

    1

    1)/(

    0

    0

    V

    VVff

    = (final reflection coefficient)

    Zu = 50 for Tektronix 1502B cable tester.Rapp measured by sorting the sensor rods.Ks sensor constant obtained by calibration

    with saline solutions.(Temperature correction)

    ETSEA

    WARNINGSThe method gives and average value of water content

    over the length of the transmission line.

    Volume of influence: cylinder of = rod distance

    35Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) ETSEA CALIBRATION

    Universal calibration or Topp equation

    Works better for sandy soils. Good for relative values. Low bulk densities,

    specific mineralogical properties,clays and soil structure modifies K().=> Soil-specific calibration.

    Field calibration Only a dry and wet point and adjust

    the Topp equation.The complete relationship.

    43210)043.05,5292530(

    ++= KKK

    36Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR)

  • 7/30/2019 MS 03 Soil Water Content

    10/13

    ETSEA

    Commercial equipment TRASE (Soilmoisture)

    37Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) ETSEA Commercial equipment

    Hydrosense 3% (Campbell)

    TDR100 (Campbell) TRIME 3% (SDEC)

    38Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR)

    ETSEACapacitance Method

    PRINCIPLE Measurement of the soil capacitance K

    With a bridge at a frequency of 100-150 MHz

    With a LC oscillator circuit, the frequency of oscillation is a directmeasure of the capacitance.

    MATERIALS & METHODS Access Tube

    Plastic (metal are not suitable, it acts as a barrier to the electric field)

    The gap between access tube and soil < 0.5 mm

    SAKC 108542,8 12=

    39Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    LCF

    2

    1=

    ETSEA

    MATERIALS & METHODS Prove

    Parallel electrodes

    Cylindrical

    40Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Capacitance Method

  • 7/30/2019 MS 03 Soil Water Content

    11/13

    ETSEA

    WARNINGS Distance between electrodes. Compromise between:

    Radius of influence (3-4 cm)

    Depth resolution (2 cm)

    Measurement dominated by the soil around theelectrodes: small-scales lateral heterogeneity, air gapsand channelling of water may interfere.

    Requires soil-specific calibration.

    41Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Capacitance Method ETSEAWARNINGS

    No linear relationship between K and

    42Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Capacitance Method

    ETSEAFrequency Domain Reflectometry (FDR) PRINCIPLE

    A low frequency (100 MHz) sinusoidal signal is propagatedalong the transmission line to the soil probe and reflects back

    (change in K) causing a voltage standing wave to be set up onthe transmission line. The amplitude difference between the beginning and at the end

    of the transmission line is empirically related to the complexrelative dielectric constant:

    K = K - j K K is a function of . K is related to the bulk electrical conductivity.

    43Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    ETSEA

    ADVANTAGES The sensor is factory calibrated with a reference

    impedance. This improves accuracy by eliminating

    influences of cable lengths and quality, connectors andswitches. Cheaper sensors. They measure also temperature to make corrections. K more sensitive to changes than K potentially more

    accurate than TDR. DISADVANTAGES

    Due to the low frequency the relationship between K a is more influenced by the soil calibration

    44Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Frequency Domain Reflectometry (FDR)

  • 7/30/2019 MS 03 Soil Water Content

    12/13

    ETSEA

    SOIL-SPECIFIC CALIBRACIN

    45Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Frequency Domain Reflectometry (FDR) ETSEA

    Commercial proves: Diviner2000 (Sentek)

    Enviroscan (Sentek)

    46Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Frequency Domain Reflectometry (FDR)

    ETSEA

    Comercial probes: Thetaprove (Delta-T)

    ML2x 1%

    SM200 3%

    Profile probe (Delta-T)

    47Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Frequency Domain Reflectometry (FDR) ETSEA

    Commercial probes: ECH2O 3% (Decagon)

    48Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    Frequency Domain Reflectometry (FDR)

  • 7/30/2019 MS 03 Soil Water Content

    13/13

    ETSEAGround Penetrating Radar (GPR)

    PRINCIPLE

    Uses short pulses of high frequency electromagnetic waves (50-1500 MHz)

    ADVANTAGES Noninvasive

    Fast

    Suitable forlarge areas

    49Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering

    ETSEAFromFrom SoilSoil WaterWater PotentialPotential

    PRINCIPLE

    Estimate soil water content () measuring soil water potential(h).

    DRAWBACKS: We need to know the (h)

    Hysteresis of the (h) curve

    We need to measure soil waterpotential

    50Soil Water Content Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering