msa training
TRANSCRIPT
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
1
WELCOME TO TRAINING PROGRAM ONMEASUREMENT SYSTEM
ANALYSIS (MSA)
BY CHINTAMANI KULKARNI
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
2
What is Measurement system A measurement system is a process by which
we assign a number to a characteristic of a product / service.
A measurement system includes Standard Item of interest (Work piece) Measurement equipment (Instrument) Personnel / Procedure to use the equipment Environment under which to conduct the
measurement i.e. SWIPE
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
3
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
4
Effect of Measurement system error on Product Decisions A wrong decision may
be taken whenever any part of the measurement distribution overlaps a specification limit.
A “Good” part will sometimes be called as “Bad” (type I error, producer’s risk or false alarm)
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
5
Effect of Measurement system error on Product Decisions A “Bad” part will
sometimes be called as “Good” (type II error, consumer’s risk or miss rate)
This is most risky as Consumer will be suffering as “Bad” part will be delivered to him as “Good” part.
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
6
What is MSA?
Measurement System Analysis (MSA) Deals with analyzing the effect of the
Measurement system on the measured value Emphasis is on the effect due to equipment &
personnel We test the system to determine numerical
values of its statistical properties and compare them to Accepted Standards
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
7
Measurement is not ALWAYS ExactMeasurement system variation affects Individual measurements Decisions based on data
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
8
Attribute measurement system example
Could this ball hit the stumps? (Decision for LBW)
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
9
You require measurement system which will give enlarged
view
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
10
Ball just misses the stump. But will player will be given out or not? (OK or NOT OK) Can umpire give repeatedly CORRECT decisions?
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
11
Repeatability
Variation in measurements obtained with one measurement instrument when used several times by one assessor while measuring identical characteristic on same part.
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
12
Reproducibility
Reproducibility is variation in average of measurements made by different assessors using same measuring instrument when measuring identical characteristic on same part.
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
13
Stability
Stability (or drift) is total variation in measurements obtained with a measurement system on same master or parts when measuring a single characteristic over an extended time period.
(a time period is days, not hours)
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
14
Linearity
Difference in bias values through expected operating range of gage.
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
15
Bias
Difference between observed average of measurements and reference value. Reference value, also known as accepted reference value or master value, is a value that serves as an agreed‑upon reference for measured values. A reference value can be determined by averaging several measurements with a higher level of measuring equipment.
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
16
MSA Plan
Sr. No.
Measurement System
MSA Type
Elements of system Planned in
1 Thickness measurement
R & R Equipment – Micrometer 0.01 L.C.
Component – Dial 2 +/- 0.08
Environmental conditions – Ambient
Appraiser / Trial – 3 / 2
April 2006
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
17
Gage R&R
Gage R&R is conducted for Variable measurements Attribute measurements
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
18
Conducting Gage R&R study (variable) Sample of Ten units are selected from
manufacturing process. Three assessors who usually do
measurements are selected to conduct study. Each part is measured Two / Three times at
random by three assessors and results are collected & tabulated.
Equipment variation & Appraiser variation is calculated
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
19
Conducting Gage R&R study (variable) Calculations R = 0.3417, n = 10, r = 3, Xdiff = 0.4446, Rp = 3.511 Repeatability = Equipment variation (EV) = R * K1 = 0.3417*0.5908 = 0.20188 Reproducibility = Appraiser variation (AV) = Sq. root {(Xdiff * K2) –
(EV*EV / nr)} = 0.22963 n = parts, r = trials
Trials 2 3
K1 0.8862 0.5908
Appraisers 2 3
K2 0.7071 0.5231
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
20
Conducting Gage R&R study (variable) Repeatability & Reproducibility (GRR) = Sq. root (EV*EV + AV*AV) GRR = 0.30375 Part variation (PV) = Rp*K3 = 1.10456 Total variation (TV) = Sq. root (GRR*GRR + PV*PV) = 1.14610 % EV = 100 [EV / TV] = 17.62 % % AV = 100 [AV / TV] = 20.04 % % GRR = 100 [GRR / TV] = 26.68 % % PV = 100 [PV / TV] = 96.38 %
Parts 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
K3 0.7071 0.5231 0.4467 0.4030 0.3742 0.3534 0.3375 0.3249 0.3146
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
21
Attribute Gage Study
Select 20 parts Include some parts that are marginal on
upper & lower specification limits Select two / three assessors who regularly
use the gage as part of their daily work Take two / three measurements by each
assessor on each part at random
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
22
Parts in Gray areas
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
23
Analysis of GRR studies
If Repeatability is large compared to Reproducibility
The instrument needs maintenance The gage may need to be redesigned to be
more rigid The clamping or location for gaging needs to
be improved There is excess within part variation
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
24
Analysis of GRR studies
If Reproducibility is large compared to Repeatability
The Appraiser needs to be better trained in how to use & read gage instrument
Calibrations on the gage dial are not clear A fixture of some sort may be needed to help
the Appraiser use the gage more consistently
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
25
Gage stability study
Obtain sample & establish its reference value relative to traceable standard, identify as master sample for stability analysis
If not possible select production part in mid range of process / tolerance
Measure master(s) three to five times (based on knowledge of measurement system) at different times of the day for a week
Plot data on X bar & R chart Compare standard deviation for measurements
with process to determine suitability for the application
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
26
Bias study
Obtain accepted reference value for part Use tool room or layout inspection equipment Measure same part minimum 10 times using
gage under evaluation Calculate average of readings Bias = observed average – reference value % Bias = 100 [Bias / Process variation (or
tolerance)]
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
27
Gage Linearity Study
Select 5-8 parts that can be measured at different operating ranges of measurement system
Determine reference value for each part using layout inspection
Use one appraiser to measure parts Take 10-12 repeated measurements on each part Calculate part’s bias Bias = observed average – reference value
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
28
Gage Linearity Study
Plot bias average against reference values Linearity represented by slope of best fit line
of these points Gage linearity index = Slope X Process
variation or Tolerance % Linearity = 100 [Linearity / Process
variation or Tolerance]
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
29
Charting Linearity
Chintamani Kulkarni Rev. 0.0
30