multiple neurilemomas in the upper...

4
61 Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases 2008;66(1):61-4 Vigler M, Levine LJ, Posner MA. Multiple neurilemomas in the upper extremity: a series of three cases. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66(1):61-4. Abstract Neurilemomas are the most frequently arising benign nerve tumors of the upper extremity and are also called Schwanno- mas. Generally, they present as solitary tumors, although multiple tumors are common. Regardless of number, they are usually found on the flexor surface of the forearm and hand, and multiple tumors are almost always located within a single major nerve, its branches, or both. We present three patients who had multiple neurilemomas; two patients had tumors within a single major nerve and its branches, and the third patient had an unusual occurrence of one tumor in the ulnar nerve and a second tumor in a branch of the median nerve. N eurilemomas, also referred to as Schwannomas, are the most common neoplasms involving peripheral nerves. They comprise approximately 5% of all benign soft tissue tumors, and their incidence in the upper limb ranges from 3% to 19% of all neurilemomas. 1-5 They generally involve nerves on the flexor surface of the forearm and are usually solitary although multiple tumors do occur. Neurilemomas are encapsulated nerve sheath tumors that arise from the Schwann cells of myelin sheaths. Nerve fascicles remain intact and are typically splayed over the surface of the tumor. Those fascicles can usually be pre- served at surgery. Case One DW, a 41-year-old urologist, first examined more than 20 years ago, had a gradually enlarging mass on the volar aspect of his dominant right ring finger that had appeared 8 years earlier. He complained of numbness in the finger and also of pain in the area of the medial epicondyle of his elbow that began approximately one year earlier. His past medical history was significant in that he had prior excisions of two tumors in that same extremity. The first tumor was excised during childhood from the same right ring finger but at a more proximal site. The operation had been performed by his father, a general surgeon, who simply discarded the tissue and did not submit it for microscopic study. When the patient was 27, a second tumor was excised from the ulnar nerve of his right wrist and was reported to be a “neurilemoma.” Clinical examination showed a nontender mass that measured 2.0 cm x 1.0 cm over the middle segment of the ring finger, directly over the ulnar digital nerve. The mass was distal to the operative site of the mass excised from that same finger by his father many years earlier. The second mass was nontender, but the patient reported numbness at the ulnar tip of the finger and two-point discrimination was slightly impaired (7 to 8 mm). There was a second mass that the patient was not aware of at the site of his elbow pain. This mass was at the cubital tunnel, directly over the ulnar nerve, where it passed between the two heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle. The mass measured approximately 1.5 cm x 0.5 cm, and percussion over it produced distal paresthesias that radiated into the little finger. At surgery, the tumor in the finger was within the ulnar digital nerve and the tumor at the elbow, within the ulnar nerve (Fig. 1). The nerve fascicles at both sites were splayed over the tumors and were preserved at surgery. Histological examination confirmed that both tumors were neurilemomas. Postoperatively, forearm pain and sensitivity over the ulnar nerve in that area disappeared. However, numbness in the Multiple Neurilemomas in the Upper Extremity A Series of Three Cases Mordechai Vigler, M.D., Lewis J. Levine, M.D., and Martin A. Posner, M.D. Mordechai Vigler, M.D., and Lewis J. Levine, M.D., were Hand Fellows, Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases. Martin A. Posner, M.D., is Clinical Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine and Chief of the Division of Hand and Wrist Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York. Correspondence: Martin Posner, M.D., 2 East 88 Street, New York, New York 10128; [email protected].

Upload: vonhan

Post on 05-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

61Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases 2008;66(1):61-4

Vigler M, Levine LJ, Posner MA. Multiple neurilemomas in the upper extremity: a series of three cases. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66(1):61-4.

Abstract

Neurilemomas are the most frequently arising benign nerve tumors of the upper extremity and are also called Schwanno-mas. Generally, they present as solitary tumors, although multiple tumors are common. Regardless of number, they are usually found on the flexor surface of the forearm and hand, and multiple tumors are almost always located within a single major nerve, its branches, or both. We present three patients who had multiple neurilemomas; two patients had tumors within a single major nerve and its branches, and the third patient had an unusual occurrence of one tumor in the ulnar nerve and a second tumor in a branch of the median nerve.

Neurilemomas, also referred to as Schwannomas, are the most common neoplasms involving peripheral nerves. They comprise approximately 5% of all

benign soft tissue tumors, and their incidence in the upper limb ranges from 3% to 19% of all neurilemomas.1-5 They generally involve nerves on the flexor surface of the forearm and are usually solitary although multiple tumors do occur. Neurilemomas are encapsulated nerve sheath tumors that arise from the Schwann cells of myelin sheaths. Nerve fascicles remain intact and are typically splayed over the surface of the tumor. Those fascicles can usually be pre-served at surgery.

Case One DW, a 41-year-old urologist, first examined more than 20 years ago, had a gradually enlarging mass on the volar aspect of his dominant right ring finger that had appeared 8 years earlier. He complained of numbness in the finger and also of pain in the area of the medial epicondyle of his elbow that began approximately one year earlier. His past medical history was significant in that he had prior excisions of two tumors in that same extremity. The first tumor was excised during childhood from the same right ring finger but at a more proximal site. The operation had been performed by his father, a general surgeon, who simply discarded the tissue and did not submit it for microscopic study. When the patient was 27, a second tumor was excised from the ulnar nerve of his right wrist and was reported to be a “neurilemoma.” Clinical examination showed a nontender mass that measured 2.0 cm x 1.0 cm over the middle segment of the ring finger, directly over the ulnar digital nerve. The mass was distal to the operative site of the mass excised from that same finger by his father many years earlier. The second mass was nontender, but the patient reported numbness at the ulnar tip of the finger and two-point discrimination was slightly impaired (7 to 8 mm). There was a second mass that the patient was not aware of at the site of his elbow pain. This mass was at the cubital tunnel, directly over the ulnar nerve, where it passed between the two heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle. The mass measured approximately 1.5 cm x 0.5 cm, and percussion over it produced distal paresthesias that radiated into the little finger. At surgery, the tumor in the finger was within the ulnar digital nerve and the tumor at the elbow, within the ulnar nerve (Fig. 1). The nerve fascicles at both sites were splayed over the tumors and were preserved at surgery. Histological examination confirmed that both tumors were neurilemomas. Postoperatively, forearm pain and sensitivity over the ulnar nerve in that area disappeared. However, numbness in the

Multiple Neurilemomas in the Upper ExtremityA Series of Three Cases

Mordechai Vigler, M.D., Lewis J. Levine, M.D., and Martin A. Posner, M.D.

Mordechai Vigler, M.D., and Lewis J. Levine, M.D., were Hand Fellows, Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases. Martin A. Posner, M.D., is Clinical Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine and Chief of the Division of Hand and Wrist Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York. Correspondence: Martin Posner, M.D., 2 East 88 Street, New York, New York 10128; [email protected].

Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases 2008;66(1):61-462

ring finger persisted, and two-point discrimination increased to 11 to 12 mm. The patient returned 9 years later, because he had noted two new masses, one on the volar-ulnar aspect of the ring finger distal to the site of the last operation and a second over the dorsum of the distal segment of the same finger, just proximal to the nail. At surgery, the mass on the volar side of the finger was within the ulnar digital nerve, distal to the distal interphalangeal flexion crease, and measured 0.3 cm x 0.3 cm. The dorsal mass did not appear to be as-sociated with any nerve. Both tumors were excised, and the pathologist reported that both were neurilemomas. The patient remained symptom free for almost 10 years, except for slight numbness at the ulnar tip of the ring finger. He returned because of two additional masses (the seventh and eighth tumors in his right upper extremity), one on the ulnar side of his palm and the other in the little finger. At surgery, both tumors were intraneural, the palmar tumor within the common digital nerve to the ring and little fingers, and the little finger tumor within the ulnar digital nerve. Both were excised, and both were neurilemomas on microscopic ex-amination. The patient has no disability; he continues his full time practice in urology and participates fully in leisure time activities.

Case TwoSF, a 31-year-old female secretary, presented with soft masses on the volar aspects of her dominant left hand and forearm. The palmar mass had been present for more than 13 years and had been diagnosed as a “ganglion” by her family physician. The forearm mass had appeared within the past 3 years and was associated with increasing numbness and paresthesias in the thumb and middle finger. That mass was located 3.0 cm proximal to the wrist flexion crease and measured 1.0 cm x 1.0 cm. It was nontender and there was no Tinel over it. However, percussion over the palmar mass

that also measured 2.5 cm x 1.5 cm caused paresthesias that radiated into the middle finger. At surgery, both masses were intraneural tumors, the palmar mass within the common digital nerve to the index and middle fingers, and the forearm mass within the median nerve (Fig. 2). Both tumors were excised and pathological study confirmed that they were neurilemomas. Postopera-tively, there were no motor or sensory deficits.

Case ThreeGW, a 40-year-old male clerical worker, complained of ul-nar-sided right wrist pain of approximately 1 year’s duration and occasional paresthesias in his ring and little fingers. The patient was also aware of a gradually enlarging mass on the volar surface of the mid-forearm. On examination, the mid-forearm mass measured ap-proximately 3.0 cm x 2.0 cm. It was nontender and there was no Tinel with percussion over it. On the volar-ulnar side of the proximal forearm, there was second much smaller mass over the course of the ulnar nerve at a site 5.0 cm distal to the medial epicondyle. The second mass was tender, but there was no Tinel with percussion over it. There were no sensory deficits in the hand, but there was marked weakness of the ulnar innervated intrinsic muscles. The median innervated intrinsic muscles and all extrinsic muscles were not affected. Radiographs of the forearm were negative, but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast highlighted both masses. Electrodiagnostic studies showed a focal neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the site of the mass. At surgery, the mid-forearm tumor was not within the median nerve, but was adjacent to it and attached by a thin nerve fiber (Fig. 3). It was encapsulated and easily excised. The more proximal tumor was within the ulnar nerve and its fascicles splayed over it. Those fascicles were preserved at excision of the tumor. Both tumors were neurilemomas. Postoperatively, there were no sensory deficits and the

Figure 1 Tumor within the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Figure 2 Tumor partially excised from within median nerve on the left, and a second tumor within common digital nerve on the right.

63Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases 2008;66(1):61-4

patient recovered full power of the ulnar nerve innervated intrinsic muscles within 4 months.

DiscussionNeurilemomas are the most common neoplasms arising from neural tissue. They were first described by Verocay, in 1908, who termed them neurinomas. The name neurile-moma was later coined by Stoudt in 1935.6 Neurilemomas usually present as painless, round or oval masses on the flexor surfaces of upper extremities. They rarely measure more than 2.5 cm in diameter and are often misdiagnosed as cysts, ganglions, or lipomas.7 Neurilemomas are slightly more common in females and generally appear between the second to eighth decades.7,8 They are usually solitary tumors, although there are many reports in the literature of patients with multiple tumors that arise sequentially.6,9,10 In cases of multiple neurilemomas, their distribution is generally within one major nerve and its branches.11-13 This was the situation in our first two patients. The first patient has had a total of seven histologically confirmed neurilemomas that developed sequentially over a period of more than 15 years. An eighth tumor, the first he had when a child, was removed by his physician father, who did not have it pathologically examined. That tumor was probably a neurilemoma, since it involved the little finger of the same extremity as the other tumors. Rarely, multiple neurilemomas can arise in different major nerves, as in our third patient.11,14-17 Neurilemomas arise eccentrically from nerves or are located centrally within nerves. Regardless of location, they are usually firm in consistency, with occasional focal areas of degeneration and cysts. Since they are encapsulated and arise from the cells of nerve sheaths and not from the nerve

fibers themselves, they can usually be separated from the fibers when excised. This can be difficult for a large tumor within a digital nerve, since there are few fascicles at this location and the fascicles themselves may be severely at-tenuated. However, resection of a neurilemoma with the involved portion of the nerve is almost never required.4 Neurilemomas are composed of several types of cellular elements that characterize its histological appearance (Fig. 4). Those elements are Antoni A tissue, composed of closely packed spindle shaped cells arranged in a palisading net-work; Antoni B tissue that is far less organized, consisting of myxoid tissue with cystic spaces and sparsely populated with cells; and Verocay bodies that are linear arrays of spindle cell nuclei. The three elements are not all always present in every tumor.7,13,18,19 Neurilemomas must be differentiated from neurofibro-mas. Aside from café-au-lait discolorations that are common with neurofibromas, there are two important differences between the tumors. The first is that, unlike neurilemomas, neurofibromas are not encapsulated and the nerve’s fascicles are an integral part of the tumor. Excision is therefore im-possible without damaging the fibers. It is for that reason that solitary neurofibromas are generally left undisturbed if nerve function has not been severely compromised and the patient is asymptomatic. The second important difference is that, unlike neurilemomas, neurofibromas have potential for malignant degeneration. This is more likely to occur when there are multiple tumors associated with Von Reck-linghausen’s disease, where the incidence of malignancy is approximately 15%.7 Therefore, biopsy is recommended for a neurofibroma that enlarges or becomes painful, although malignant degeneration may not necessarily result in pain.

Figure 3 Mid-forearm tumor arising from a nerve branch adjacent to the median nerve.

Figure 4 Histological appearance of neurilemoma, consisting of closely packed spindle-shaped cells representing Antoni type A tissue (square); cystic spaces containing sparsely populated cells representing Antoni type B tissue (triangle); and linear array of spindle cell nuclei representing Verocay bodies (circle).

Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases 2008;66(1):61-464

Since the treatment and prognosis are significantly different for neurilemomas and neurofibromas, careful inspection of these tumors at surgery is critically important. Proper treat-ment for a neurilemoma is excision and careful surgical technique; the aid of a microscope or loupe magnification will usually avoid any further damage to the nerve’s fas-cicles. Since neurilemomas are often multiple, generally arising as sequential tumors, patients should be alerted to this possibility, and periodic clinical examinations are ad-visable. The sequential development of additional tumors is usually within the same major nerve and its branches, but other tumors can also arise in different major nerves.

Disclosure StatementNone of the authors have a financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter or materials discussed, including, but not limited to, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, and paid expert testimony.

References1. Kransdorf MJ. Benign soft-tissue tumors in a large referral

population: distribution of specific diagnoses by age, sex, and location. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Feb;164(2):395-402.

2. Myhre-Jensen O. A consecutive 7-year series of 1331 benign soft tissue tumors. Clinicopathologic data. Comparison with sarcomas. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981 Jun;52(3):287-93.

3. Das Gupta TK, Brasfield RD, Strong EW, et al. Benign solitary schwannomas (neurilemomas). Cancer. 1969 Aug;24(2):355-66.

4. Phalen GS. Neurilemmomas of the forearm and hand. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Jan-Feb;(114):219-22.

5. Stack HG. Tumors of the hand. Br Med J. 1960 Mar 26;1(5177):919-22.

6. Isenberg JS, Mayer P, Butler W, et al. Multiple recurrent be-nign schwannomas of deep and superficial nerves of the upper extremity: a new variant of segmental neurofibromatosis. Ann

Plast Surg. 1994 Dec;33(6):659-63.7. Strickland JW, Steichen JB. Nerve tumors of the hand and

forearm. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1977 Jul;2(4):285-91.8. Wold LE, McLeod RA, Sim FH, et al. Atlas of Orthopedic

Pathology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co. 1990, pp. 186-191.

9. Barre PS, Shaffer JW, Carter JR, et al. Multiplicity of neu-rilemomas in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1987 Mar;12(2):307-11.

10. Leverkus M, Kluwe L, Roll EM, et al. Multiple unilat-eral schwannomas: segmental neurofibromatosis type 2 or schwannomatosis? Br J Dermatol. 2003;148(4):804-9.

11. Lewis RC Jr, Nannini LH, Cocke WM Jr. Multifocal neuri-lemmomas of median and ulnar nerves of the same extrem-ity—case report. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1981 Jul;6(4):406-8.

12. Tanabe K, Tada K, Ninomiya H. Multiple schwannomas in the radial nerve. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1997 Oct;22(5):664-6.

13. White NB. Neurilemomas of the extremities. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1967 Dec;49(8):1605-10.

14. Hecht OA, Hass A. Regional multiplicity of a neurilemoma. Hand. 1982;Feb;14(1):97-9.

15. Kato N, Nemoto K, Arino H, et al. Multiple neurilemmomas of the median and ulnar nerves with a communicating branch in the same upper extremity. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2002;36(5):314-5.

16. Rosberg HE, Ekerot L. Multifocal neurilemomas in the same upper extremity: case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1996 Jun;30(2):153-6.

17. Tang JB, Ishii S, Usui M, et al. Multifocal neurilemomas in different nerves of the same upper extremity. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1990 Sep;15(5):788-92.

18. Cotran RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL. Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co., 1989, pp. 1445-1446.

19. Shishiba T, Niimura M, Ohtsuka F, et al. Multiple cutaneous neurilemmomas as a skin manifestation of neurilemmoma-tosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984 May;10(5 Pt 1):744-54.