municipality of north cowichan joint utilities board …...municipality of north minutes cowichan...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Municipality of North CowichanJoint Utilities Board
Agenda
Date: Thursday, May 2, 2013Time: 1:00 pmLocation: City of Duncan City Hall Meeting Room
Pages
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Adoption of Minutes 2 - 2
4. Business
4.1 Election of Chair - City for 2013
4.2 Review of CVRD Central Sector Liquid Waste Management Plan SteeringCommittee Minutes
3 - 6
4.3 JUB Governance Study 7 - 22
4.4 JUB Capacity Study 23 - 24
4.5 JUB 2013 Budget 25 - 26
5. New Business
6. Adjournment
MUNICIPALITY of North
COWICHAN Minutes Meeting Joint Utilities Board File: 0550-20 JUB Date Monday, August 15, 2011 Time 1:00 p.m. Place North Cowichan Municipal Hall – Large Committee Room Members Present North Cowichan: Councillors Al Siebring and Dave Haywood
City of Duncan: Councillors Tom Duncan and Joe Thorne Also Present North Cowichan: Mayor Tom Walker; Dave Devana, Chief Administrative Officer;
John MacKay, Director of Engineering and Operations; and Clay Reitsma, Assistant Municipal Engineer. City of Duncan: Mayor Phil Kent; Councillor Paul Fletcher; Tom Ireland, Chief Administrative Officer; and Peter de Verteuil, Director of Finance. Cowichan Valley Regional District: Dave Leitch, Manager, Water Management.
Election of Chair
The Board elected Councillor Dave Haywood as Chair.
Agenda The Board approved the agenda, as circulated. Minutes The Board adopted the minutes of the meeting held on November 10, 2010. Closed Session The Board closed the meeting to the public at 1:05 p.m. to consider matters
under sections 90(1)(e) and (k) of the Community Charter. Rise and Report The Board rose without reporting at 2:15 p.m., and resolved back into its open
meeting. New Business Capacity Units The Board began a discussion on capacity units and deferred this matter to the
next meeting. Adjournment The meeting ended at 2:20 p.m. Next Meeting The next meeting will be held at the call of the Chair. Certified correct Recording Secretary Chair or presiding member
2
APPROVAL OFAGENDA
ADOPTIONOF MINUTES
BUSINESS ARISINGOUT OF MINUTES
BA1
MIMinutes of the meeting of the Central Sector Liquid WasteManagement Plan Steering Committee held in the Boardroom,175 lngram Street, Duncan, on January 24, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.
PRESENT: Mayor Lefebure, North Cowichan, ChairDirector Duncan, Electoral Area E <9:35 a.m.>Director lannidinardo, Electoral Area DSharon Jackson, City of Duncan Alternate
ABSENT: Mayor Kent, City of DuncanChief Alphonse, Cowichan Tribes
ALSOPRESENT: Brian Dennison, P. Eng., CVRD
Tom lreland, CAO, City of DuncanDave Devana, CAO, North CowichanJohn MacKay, P. Eng., North CowichanBaljeet Mann, MoEHelen Reid, Cowichan TribesRodger Hunter, Cowichan Watershed BoardJoanne Bath, Recording Secretary
It was moved and seconded that the agenda be approved aspresented.
MOTION CARRIED
The following correction was noted to the last sentence ofDiscussion ltem D-2: "A ç16,321,000 grant application has beensubmitted by Duncan/North Cowichan Joint Utifities Board topipe effluent out to a Satellite Channel outfall."
It was moved and seconded that the minutes of theNovember 22,2012 Central Sector Liquid Waste ManagementPlan Steering Committee meeting be adopted as amended.
MOTION CARRIED
Mr. Dennison advised that the bylaw to establish the CentralSector LWMP function received three readings at the CVRDBoard and will now go to the Province and City of Duncan andNorth Cowichan Councils for approval, before adoption.
3
Minutes of the Central Sector Liquid Waste Management Plan
Steering Committee Meeting of January 24,2013 Page 2
CORRESPONDENCE
REPORTS
R1
R2
A letter to Cowichan Tribes from the Steering Committee Chairregarding the proposed Satellite Channel Outfallwas received.
The Chair advised that the Tribes have not responded to thisletter.
Helen Reid, Cowichan Tribes representative, advised that it is herunderstanding that the Tribes are in favour of this initiative, butshe will look into it and report back.
Draft terms of reference for a JUB governance study wereprovided f or discussion.
It was moved and seconded that the Duncan/North CowichanJoint Utilities Board be requested to include funding of$20,000 in the JUB budget to undertake the 2013 GovernanceStudy, based on the following Terms of Reference:1. ldentify suitable potent¡al governance models for the
JUB to include wholly owned corporation, commissionand any others that may be pertinent for the conditionsof the JUB.
2. Provide a report comparing and contrasting theadvantages and disadvantages of each governancemodel.
3. Participate in a discussion session with the stakeholdersto consider the various options.
MOTION CARRIED
John MacKay provided a report on Joint Utility Board capacity. Astudy is now required to reassess the lagoon capacity.
Discussion took place regarding the need for additional capacityunits in Cowichan Bay due to failing septic systems and the 69units already committed to developers for new subdivisions.
The Ministry of Environment voiced concern that the Committee isjumping ahead with an amendment before initial steps are put inplace. The Ministry has yet to receive a response to their letterrequesting an update on the plan.
Mr. Dennison replied that response to the Ministry's letter ispending a decision on issues to be addressed in the amendment.Also there are financial considerations, waiting to see if grantmoney comes through.
4
Minutes of the Central Sector Liquid Waste Management PlanSteering Committee Meeting of January 24,2013 Page 3
R3
R4
It was moved and seconded that the Duncan/North CowichanJoint Utilities Board (JUB) be requested to undertake acapacity review of the JUB to determine if additional capacitycan be provided to the users of the treatment system withoutundertaking improvements.
MOTION CARRIED
Sharon Jackson asked that the consultant for this work report toall stakeholders.
Discussed under R2.
The Committee considered a recommendation for revised termsof reference for the plan amendment.
Discussion took place regarding keeping the Central Sector LiquidWaste Management Plan focused on sewage. CVRD aresuggesting a basin based liquid waste management plan beestablished separately. Mr. Jones will bring this initiative forwardto other CAOs in the near future.
The Ministry of Environment commented that the Liquid WasteManagement Plan is a versatile tool and a backbone for futureamendments. lf a Non-point Source Pollution Plan is alsoestablished and signed off by the Minister, it could also provide abackbone for future initiatives. The Ministry has been promotingaddressing non-point pollution in the plan amendment for sometime.
It was moved and seconded that the following issues beaddressed in an amendment process for the Central SectorLiquid Waste Management Plan:1. The establishment of a new ocean outfall to replace the
existing JUB discharge to the Cowichan River within 10years in keeping with the 2011 lease agreement signedbetween the Cowichan Tribes, City of Duncan and theMunicipality of North Cowichan.
2. Consider the long term replacement of the existing JUBtreatment works.
3. Review and update other initiatives in the current plandocument.
MOTION CARRIED
It was moved and seconded that the meeting be adjourned.ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10:55 a.m.
MOTION CARRIED
5
Minutes of the Central Sector Liquid Waste Management PlanSteering Commìttee Meeting of January 24,2013 Page 4
Chair Recording Secretary
Dated:
6
March 14,2013 File No. RFP-ES-o10-13
- Þqy,ca n /Nb r+\ Cw ;c|an/ 5o,^qï U{1 íli(.t boàràf
RE: RFP - ES-010-13 - lnvestigation of Alternatives forGovernance of the Joint Utilities Board laqoon treatment svstem
Your firm is invited to submit a proposal to carry out an investigation of alternatives forgovernance of the Duncan - North Cowichan Joint Utilities Board (JUB) lagoon treatmentsystem.
Backgroundïhe sewage treatment and disposal system servinthe Municipality of North Cowichan, the Cowichportions of Cowichan Tribes land is leased from Cthe attached long term lease agreement. The sewage collection service areas in Cowichan Bayand Eagle Heights are owned and operated by the CVRD. The Cowichan Tribes operate theirown collection system. Each of these areas have a separate service agreement with the City ofDuncan and the Municipality of North Cowichan.. (See attached service agreements forCowichan Bay and Eagle Heights Sewer Systems)
The system is managed by a joint sub-committee of the City of Duncan and Municipality ofNorth Cowichan councils, referred to as the Joint Utilities Board (JUB). Annual budgets, majorupgrades and other longer term or more expensive decisions for the system are considered bythe JUB with recommendations requiring ratification by both councils. Agreement service arearepresentatives are invited to attend the periodic JUB meetings, but do not have voting rights.Plant operations are carried out by North Cowichan staff.
ln 1994, the CVRD, together with the City of Duncan, the Municipality of North Cowichan andthe Cowichan Tribes, embarked on a liquid waste management planning process. The resultingCentral Sector Liquid Waste Management Plan (CSLWMP) was approved by the Minister ofEnvironment in August 1999. Among other initiatives, the CSLWMP resulted in upgrades andimprovements carried out at the JUB lagoon facilitg One of the long term goals of the plan is toinvestigate the replacement of the existing discha into the Cowichan River with an outfall intoSatellite Channel between Vancouver lsland and ltspring lsland.
The CSLWMP Steering Committee has recently l'feld a series of meetings to initiate an updateto the plan, which was last amended in June 2001
b1 4tdfùB
7
ã h ¿,^ tø[ r o'lê -lû c.1- C¡ ¡ i c
March 14,201 Í iAddressee F¡ r.'
An ongoing issue between the "owners" of the JUB system and the ment service areas isthe allocation of capacity. The service agreements allocate capacity\y a system of "capacityunits". The basis for a capacity unit is the expected sewagehome. Equivalent capacity unit values have been assigned to a varietyand other uses. When the agreements were prepared, after a major u grade of the lagoonsystem, the units were allocated according to the total estimated capacity Qf the lagoon systemand the proportion of the upgrade costs paid by each jurisdiction, which inlturn, was based onthe sewage flows then being discharged to the lagoons. However, since tl|e agreements weresigned, the Cowichan Bay area in particular has seen a disproportionally rate of uptakeof residual capacity resulting in all of the residual capacity being al ln this case, onejurisdiction may purchase residual capacity from another system; however,r'if no other system isprepared to sell capacity, then further growth in the service area may not occur.
ln the past, the CVRD electoral area director for Cowichan Bay has voiced frustration with thisconstraint. There has been considerable discussion at the CSLWMP Steering Committee levelregarding this issue, including the consideration whether another form of governance of the JUBshould be considered.
Consequently at the January 24,2013 meeting of the Central Sector Liquid Waste ManagementPlan Steering Committee it was resolved that:
"The DuncanlMorth Cowichan Joint Utilities Board be requested to íncludefunding of $20,000 in the JUB budget to undertake the 2013 Governance Study,öased on the following Terms of Reference:1. Identify suitable potential governance models for the JUB to include wholly
owned corporation, commíssion and any others that may be peñinent for theconditions of the JUB.
2. Provide a report comparing and contrasting the advantages anddisadvantages of each governance model.
3. Participate in a drscussíon session with the stakeholders to consíder thevarious options."
A preliminary assessment of a commission model and a wholly owned corporate model for
from a residential
Terms of F(eterenceYour firm is invited to submit a proposal to carry out an investigation ot alternatives torgovernance of the JUB lagoon treatment system. As noted in the above resolution it is
expected that a commission system and a wholly owned corporation at a minimum beconsidered. Also any other system or combination of systems as may be appropriate for themulti-party conditions of the JUB should be considered and contrasted.
The best governance system would meet the following expectations of the stakeholders1. Provide security of access to capacity of the system for each of the stakeholders.2. Anticipate and develop increases in capacity so that no stakeholder would be
t/lo
3. Co"tÞt t
Ir b^ süf4.
¿ It olft{r)
8
AddresseeDate Page 3
Your work plan should include the following components.1 Meet with representatives of each of the jurisdictions currently utilizing the lagoons to
obtain their perspective and needs.2. lnvestigate alternatives and prepare a report comparing and contrasting each of the
alternatives3. Provide a presentation to the
and obtain further comment.of the draft results of the study
4. Finalize report
Evaluation of proposalsAs noted in the above resolution,work.
a maximum budget of $20,000 has been established for this
Your written submission is requested no later than . f'6D
Concise pro ls will beJoanne Bathì Supervisor, Engineering Services
Via: lursMail: 175 lngram , Duncan BC VgL 1N8
Proposals will be evaluated by a team consistingstakeholders. The following criteria will be considered.
1. Meeting the budget constraint - 4Ùo/o
2. Methodology - 20%3. Experience - 20 o/o
of representatives of each of the
4. Overall quality of proposal - 20%
A follow up presentation may be requested.
Please direct any inquiries you may have to:
ervtces,
ORMr. John Mackay, P. Eng., Director of Engineering, Municipality of North Cowichan, at250-7 46-3100 or via e-mail: [email protected]
Yours truly,
Brian Dennison, P. Eng., General ManagerEngineering & Environmental ServicesBWDD:ilboc: CLWMP Steerinq Committee' John MacKay, PIEng. MNC\\cvrdstorel \HomeD¡rs\Bath\RFPs\201 3\RFP-ES-01 0-l 3-JUBGovernance.docx
Cll J Þ"cav
9
L )sroNE, Youxc, ANpnn )NBARRISTERS & SOLICITORS
507 - 1.207 Douglas StreetSayward BuildingVictoria, BCVBW 287Tet: (250) 383-2063Fax: (250) 383-2064
VIA FAX
February 21,2005
Mr. Jim DiasAdministratorDistrict of North Cowichan7030 Trans Canada Hwy.P.O. Box 278Duncan, BC V9L 3X4
Dear Jim:
7676 - 808 Nelson StreetBox 72747, Nelson Square
Vancouver, BCV622H2TeL (604) 689-7400; Fax; (ó04) 689-3444
Toll Free: 1-800-665-3540
Rnpl-v to: V¡Ncowen Onptce
Re: Joint Utilities BoardOur F'ile No. 00024-0193
Further to our November 2I,2000 letter outlining the options available to the District and theCity of Duncan with respect to the legal nature, powers and duties of the Joint Utilities Board,you have asked us to provide an update on the law. ln this letter, we address the options of ajointcommission, company or society.
A. Background
The JIIB is an unincorporated body composed of representatives from the District and the City.The JUB's role is limited to management of the sewage lagoons that are rented from theCowichan Indian Band by the District and the City.
The JUB originated in 1977 under an agreement between the District and the City. From theDistrict's perspective, the agreement was authorized by "Duncan-North Cowichan Joint UtilitiesAgreement Bylaw 1977", Bylaw No. 1721. The agreement provided for the establishment of theJUB as a board composed of two council members from each municipalit¡ supported by seniormunicipal staff.
Section 7 of the agreement provided:
"When a joint use of any utility, including sanitary sewer systems,has been approved the Board shall be administratively responsiblefor the construction, operation and maintenance of such utility."
The agreement further provided for a¡nual budgets to be approved by resolution of bothcouncils, with decisions to be submitted to a joint meeting of the councils if there wa.s not a
Q:\00024\0 I 93\Dias-l.rr-Dl-Jub Establishment.Doc Feb 21,2005 8:34 PlvlB
10
IL
consensus. Section 8 of the agreement expressed the extent of independence to be given to the
JUB:
"For the purpose of the administration and maintenance of anyapproved joint use of a facility, the Board shall within its budgetand terms of reference aforesaid, make recommendations to therespective Councils in regard to the engaging and discharging ofemployees; and execute such contracts and expend such monies as
may be necessary."
ln other words, the JUB was given authority to enter contracts on behalf of the District and the
City, within approved budgets, but not to enter contracts of employment.
The 1977 agreement was for a term of 20 years expiring in 1997. We understand that the
agreement has not been renewed but that the JUB continues to operate in the same manner as
previously.
To the extent the arrangement is continuing, there is an implied agreement between the Districtand the City. Since each incurs a liability, the agreement arguably should not extend beyond 5
years without the approval of the electors (or an exemption under the Liability Regulation) under
Section 175 of tbe Contmunity Charter. Other problems with the JllB include capacity to
contract, insurable interest and incurring liability without legal accountability (which fals on the
municipalities),
The issue of the [lE]'s structure and legal status has arisen in part because of insurance issues
and a potential lease with First Nations. The District and the City wish to evaluate the role that
the JUB will have, as well as the optimal legal structure.
B. Legal Nature of the JUB
The legal nature of the JUB is not clear but it likely has no legal authority to make any bindingdecisions. It is not a committee or a commission, and it is not a separate legal entity. We have
some concem that the individuals who are acting as members of the JUB could be exposed to
personal liability for actions taken without proper authorization. Therefore we continue to
recommend the legal status of the JUB be clarified.
Altematively, the JLIB could be disbanded and either of the municipalities could operate the
selvage lagoons under an agreement between the municipalities. Assuming the District and the
City wish to continue with management of the lagoons by a distinct entity, ìn our view thc two
feasible approaches in that regard are:
(a) establishment of a joint commission under Sections 8(1), 14 and 143 of the
Community Charter; or
(b) incorporation of a company under the Business Corporations Act'
Q:\00024\0 I s3\Dias-Ltr-Dl-Jub Establishment,Doc Feb 21. 2005 8:34 PM/B
11
aJ
A joint commission would not exist as a separate corporation, but could exercise extensivedelegated authority. A company would be an independent corporation and its relationship withthe municipalities would have to be controlled through a comprehensive agreement. Ifindependent borrowíng authority and protection of the municipalities from liability are critical, intheory the incorporation of a company could offer an advantage.
C. Establishment of a Joint Conlmission
Section 143 of the Community Charter empowers a nunicipal to establish and appointcommissions to:
(a) operate services,
(b) undertake operation and enforcement in relation toCouncil's exercise of its regulatory authority, or
(c) manage property and licenses held by themunicipality.
In carrying out its powers and duties, a commission acts only as an extension of the localgovernment. A commission only has those functions which are expressly delegated to it by the
local government. However, the delegation authority conferred by Section 154 includes allstatutory powers, duties and functions of the local government, subject to some specificexceptions, The powers and duties which could be exercised by the JllB include the following:
(a) expending municipal funds, rvithin approved budgets, and maintaining separate
accounts;
(b) contracting with suppliers and consultants;
(c) contracting with service customers;
(d) owning property, including interests in land;
(e) engaging, administering and dismissing employees; and
(Ð enforcing bylaws relating to the use of the sewage lagoons.
It even appears that expropriation powers could be delegated to a commission. Under Section
154(2) of the Community Charter, the powers and duties that may not be delegated to a
commission include all powers and duties that a¡e only exercisable by bylaw and the power toappoint, suspend or terminate a local government officer. The "bylaw" powors which cannot be
delegated to a commission include:
(a) borrowing powers;
Q:\00024\01 93\Dias-Ltr-Dl-Jub EstablishmenLDoc Feb 21,2005 8:34 PM./B
12
4
(b) property taxation;
(c) the imposition of fees and charges; and
(d) establishment of sewer user regulations, prohibitions and requirements.
In summary, a joint commission could be authorized to carry out all the functions that the JUB
presently undertakes. In addition, the JUB could be authorized to:
(a) hold a licence or lease of the sewage lagoon lands;
(b) make independent decisions regarding the repair, upgrading or replacement of the
sewage lagoons, within budgets approved by the Councils;
(c) enter agreements with the Cowichan Indian Band, the CVRD and other customers
regarding use of the sewage lagoons;
(d) engage and supewise its own employees.
In order for the JI.IB to function as a joint commission of the Dishict and the City, it would be
necessary for both Councils to pass a resolution under section 8(1) and to adopt a bylaw under
Section 13 and 14 of the Comnrunity Charter, authorizing an agreement for the joint exercise oftheir powers through the commission.
It is important to recognize that although a commission may function independently in a range ofmatters, a commission always acts as the agent of the local government or local govemments
which create the commission. If the JtiB incuned a debt or liability, or violated the rights of an
employee or another person, responsibilrty for the [JB's actions would remain with the District
and the City.
D. Incorporation of a Company or Sociefy
Under Section 10 of the Business Corporations Act, one or more individuals may form a
company. Upon registration of the required documents, the company is incorporated as a
separate legal entity, with "the power and capacity of a natural person of full capacity'', under
Section 30 of that Act. Companies may own property and borrow money. Therefore a company
could carry on the entire business of sewage lagoon construction, operation and management.
However, local governments are restricted in their authority to incorporate and participate inprivate companies. The provincial government has a long-standing policy of not allowing
municipalities to avoid the restrictions in the Community Charter through the establishment ofprivate companies under municipal control.
Q:\00024\0 I 93\Dias-Ltr-Dl-Jub Esfablishrnenl.Doc Feb 21,2005 8:34 PMiB
13
5
Therefore, although Section 8(1) of the Community Charter allows a municípality to
"incorporate a corporation or acquire shares in a corporation." Section 185 of the Community
Charter provides:
"185. A municipalitymay only
(a) incoqporate a corporation other than a society, or
(b) acquire shares in a corporation
with the approval of the inspector,.."
One of the tests that is traditionally applied by the lnspector in considering applications under
Section 185 is whether the proposed functions of the company could be carried out by the
muricipality itself, using the powers provided in the Act (and subject to the limitations in the
Act). ihe Inspector is also interested in whether the company has limited purposes (so that it isnot free to carry on activities not contemplated at the time of approval) or whether the
municipality can sell the company shares to a third party after the municipal assets are rolled into
the company.
Finally, Section l54Q) of the Community Charter provides that the council's authority to
delegate its powers, duties and functions:
"... does not include authority to delegate to a corporationincoqporated by the local govemment or to a corporation in whicha local government acquires shares."
Therefore, if a company was to undertake the operation, maintenance, improvement and
construction of the sewage lagoons, including any related borrowing, it would be necessary for
the company to be incorporated by persons other than the municipalities and to operate at arm's
length from the municipalities. The members and shareholders of the company could not include
the municipalities.
If a company was established, the municipatities could deal with such a company through an
"gtr.*"trt under Section 8(1) of the Community Chdrter, which empowers agreements with
private companies concerning the operation of local government services and the management ofproperty held by the local government. The councils could also provide "assistance", including
loan guarantees to the company, if the agteement was structured as a "partnering agreement",
However, if the duration of the agreement was greater than five years, approval of the electors
would be required under 175 of the Community Charter (subject to the Liability Regulation)
before the municipalities could agree to assume any financial responsibilities to, or on behalf of,
the company.
In the alternative, the municipalities could pursuant to section 8(l) of the Commttníty Charter
incorporate a society under the Society Act. This would not require approval of the Inspector and
the society would relate to the municipaiities in the same manner as a company. The principal
Q:\o0024\0 I 93\Dias-Ltr-Dl-Jub Est¡blishment-Doc Feb 2I,2005 8:34 PM/B
14
6
differences relate to appointing members as opposed to being shareholders, the more limitedpulposes of the society, the nature of the constitution of a society versus that of a company, and
the rules goveming the directors.
E. Conclusions
Whether or not the JUB is continued, the District and the City should make an agreement for thejoint operation of the sewer lagoon service should be entered by of Duncan under Sections 8(1),
13 and 14 of the Community Charter, If the District and the City wish to continue operating the
sewage lagoons through a separate body, we recommend that the legal status, powers and
responsibilities of that body be clearly defined.
In our view, if the JUB is continued, all appropriate form for the JUB is a commission under
Section 154 of the Community Charter or a company or society. As noted above, a commission
could perform all of the current functions of the J[Æ1, as well as several additional functions.
Incorporation of a company to manage the sewage lagoons would make sense if it was critical tocreate an entity with independent borrowing power, to separate the entity's potential liabilityfrom that of the municipalities and to create an entity with a nanow focus or purpose. The
councils would be able to control the company or society to the extent they control the
appointment or dismissal of directors, they establish the pu¡Poses, and they enter into the
management agreement. The councils would retain more direct control in dealing with a
commission (including authority to change the members of the commission, to revoke or amend
the commission's delegated powers, or even to disband the commission).
Sincerely,
Lrosroxn, YouNc, ANnnnsox
Donald Lidstone
Q;\00024\0 193\Dias-Ltr-Dl-Jub Establishment.Doc Feb 21,2005 8:34 PMiB
15
Fea
ture
s C
ompa
rison
Cha
rt -
Com
mis
sion
s an
d C
orpo
ratio
nsl
Lege
nd
13;:"
i:,'¿
'J."
:';::,
i^,,
Sum
mar
v of
Kev
poi
nts
A c
orpo
ratio
n,
as a
n in
depe
nden
t le
gal en
tity,
has
gre
ater
fre
edom
s in
its
oper
atio
ns t
han
a co
mm
issi
on,
as it
is li
mite
d on
ly b
y its
Art
icle
s an
d ge
nera
l bus
ines
s la
w,
and
is n
ot a
utom
at¡c
elly
sub
ject
to
the
sam
e lim
itatio
ns a
nd a
ppro
vals
pla
ced
on a
com
mis
sion
by
the
cc o
r LG
A.
A c
orpo
ratio
n w
ill li
kely
be
able
to
free
ly b
orro
w o
nth
e ca
pita
l m
arke
ts,
and
acco
rdin
gly
shar
ehol
ders
will
nee
d to
brin
g le
ss,
if an
y, i
nves
tmen
t to
the
ent
erpr
ise
for
its o
pera
tions
. A
ny b
orro
win
g ne
eded
for
aco
mm
issi
on's
ope
ratio
ns w
ill h
ave
to b
e ac
hiev
ed b
y th
e lo
cal
gove
rnm
ent
thro
ugh
the
Mun
icip
al F
inan
ce A
utho
rity,
and
wou
ld n
eed
appr
oval
fro
m b
oth
the
elec
tora
te a
nd t
he ln
spec
tor
of M
unic
ipal
ities
.
Loca
l go
vern
men
ts a
re r
espo
nsib
le fo
r al
l act
s, d
efau
lts a
nd o
mis
sion
s of
the
ir co
mm
issi
ons,
an
d an
y lia
bilit
ies
incu
rred
by
a co
mm
issi
on a
re d
irect
lia
bilit
ies
of t
helo
cal go
vern
men
ts'
For
cor
pora
tions
, th
e ris
ks o
f de
bts,
tax
obl
igat
ions
and
lega
l cl
aim
s (in
clud
ing
envi
ronm
enta
l ris
k) a
re c
arrie
d by
the
cor
pora
tion,
as
sha
reho
lder
sar
e ge
nera
lly n
ot p
erso
nally
lia
ble
for
the
oblig
atio
ns o
r de
faul
ts o
f a
com
pany
.
A c
orpo
ratio
n ca
n ha
ve a
flex
ible
ow
ners
hip
stru
ctur
e, a
nd c
an fa
cilit
ate
equa
l ow
ners
hip
whe
re t
he s
hare
hold
ers
are
not
requ
ired
to b
ring
inve
stm
ent
to t
heen
terp
rise'
ow
ners
hip
inte
rest
s ca
n be
cha
nged
by
the
tran
sfer
or
issu
ance
of
shar
es w
ithou
t af
fect
ing
the
corp
orat
ion'
s ex
iste
nce
or c
ontin
ued
oper
atio
n, w
ithou
tth
e ne
ed f
or t
he b
ylaw
s re
quire
d to
est
ablis
h, o
r am
end
part
icip
atio
n in
, a
com
mis
sion
.
A c
omm
issi
on is
usu
ally
sub
ject
to
mor
e ov
ersi
ght
by e
lect
ed o
ffici
als,
res
ultin
g in
mor
e nu
mer
ous
mee
tings
and
incr
ease
d w
orkl
oads
for
suc
h of
ficia
ls.
A c
orpo
ratio
n is
able
to
oper
ate
mor
e in
depe
nden
tly t
han
a co
mm
issi
on, w
ith le
ss in
put
and
few
er o
ngoi
ng r
evie
ws
by e
lect
ed o
ffici
als
bein
g ne
eded
. ïh
is m
eans
tha
t th
eco
rpor
atio
n's
day-
to-d
ay o
pera
tions
are
not
ham
pere
d by
the
high
er le
vel
of o
vers
ight
, an
d di
sagr
eem
ents
are
min
imiz
ed.
Add
ition
ally
, a
corp
orat
ion
with
a d
edic
ated
full-
time
man
agem
ent
team
cou
ld b
e m
anda
ted
to in
nova
tivel
y de
velo
p th
e op
erat
ions
and
rev
enue
sou
rces
and
wou
ld li
kely
hav
e fe
wer
tim
e an
d re
gula
tory
cons
trai
nts
than
a c
omm
issi
on,
in d
oing
so.
A c
orpo
ratio
n al
so h
as g
reat
er f
lexi
bilit
y in
sta
ffing
and
hum
an r
esou
rce
man
agem
ent
than
a c
omm
issi
on,
as a
cor
pora
tion,
unlik
e a
com
mis
sion
, ca
n di
rect
ly e
nter
int
o em
ploy
men
t co
ntra
cts.
t W
e ha
ue a
ssum
ed t
hat
a ne
w c
orpo
ratio
n w
ould
be
crea
ted,
rat
her
than
the
acq
uisi
tion
of s
hare
s in
an
exis
t¡ng
cor
pora
tion.
Pag
e L
of 7
16
Join
t C
omm
issi
on
The
se a
re th
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he le
gisl
atio
n
appl
icab
le t
o lo
cal
gove
rnm
ents
tha
t pr
ovid
e
auth
ority
for
the
est
ablis
hmen
t of
a
com
mis
sion
or
the
inco
rpor
atio
n of
a
corp
orat
ion.
s.18
5 C
C
S.1
95 L
GA
Ss.
8(1
), 't
4 &
143
, 15
4 C
C
s.7e
6(3)
LG
AA
utho
rity
A c
orpo
ratio
n ha
s gr
eate
r fr
eedo
ms
in it
s
oper
atio
ns,
as it
is li
mite
d on
ly b
y its
Art
icle
s
and
gene
ral b
usin
ess
law
. A
cor
pora
tion
is n
ot
auto
mat
ical
ly s
ubje
ct t
o th
e sa
me
limita
tions
plac
ed o
n its
sha
reho
lder
s by
the
CC
or
LGA
'
A c
orpo
ratio
n is
an
inde
pend
ent
lega
l en
tity,
sepa
rate
and
apa
rt f
rom
its
owne
rs' l
t le
gally
has
all t
he r
ight
s an
d ob
ligat
ions
of
an in
divi
dual
, an
d is
free
to
ente
r in
to c
ontr
acts
, ow
n pr
oper
ty,
sue
and
be s
ued.
A c
omm
issi
on is
not
a s
epar
ate
lega
l en
tity
and
ther
efor
e ca
nnot
ow
n pr
oper
ty,
or s
ue
and
be s
ued,
in
its o
wn
nam
e' l
t cá
n on
ly
exer
cise
suc
h po
wer
s as
are
del
egat
ed t
o it,
by b
ylaw
, by
the
loc
al g
over
nmen
ts t
hat
esta
blis
hed
it. A
com
mis
sion
is n
ot f
ree
to
ente
r in
to c
ontr
acts
tha
t ha
ve n
ot b
een
auth
oris
ed i
n th
e re
leva
nt b
Yla
w.
Loca
l go
vern
men
ts c
an o
nly
dele
gate
som
e
of th
eir
pow
ers,
dut
ies
and
func
tions
to
a
com
mis
sion
. U
nder
S. 15
4 C
C,
the
follo
win
gpo
wer
s, d
utie
s an
d fu
nctio
ns c
anno
t be
dele
gate
d:-
Mak
ing
of a
bY
law
;
- A
pow
er o
r du
tY o
nlY
exe
rcis
able
by b
ylaw
;-
A s
tatu
tory
Pow
er o
r du
tY t
hat
requ
ires
a lo
cal
gove
rnm
ent's
aPP
rova
l or
con
sent
;-
Sta
tuto
ry P
ower
s to
hea
r aP
Pea
ls;
- T
erm
inat
ion
or a
PP
oint
men
t of
an
offic
er;
and
- P
ower
to
requ
ire r
emed
ial
actio
n'
Pag
e 2
of7
17
Join
t C
omm
issi
on
Str
uctu
re a
ndO
wne
rshi
pT
he c
ompo
sitio
n of
" .o
rnrn
irrio
n *i
llìõã
to b
e ag
reed
by
the
loca
l B
over
nmen
tses
tabl
ishi
ng
the
com
mis
sion
, an
d w
ill b
ere
flect
ed i
n th
e by
law
s au
thor
isin
g th
eag
reem
ent
for
the
crea
tion
of a
com
mis
sion
.
The
byl
aws
and
agre
emen
t to
cre
ate
the
com
mis
sion
sho
uld
set
out
all t
he r
ight
s an
dob
ligat
ions
of
the
loca
l go
vern
men
tsin
volv
ed.
Whi
lst
Firs
t N
atío
ns g
roup
s ca
n be
inv
ited
topa
rtic
ipat
e, t
hey
likel
y co
uld
not
be fu
llypa
rtic
ipat
ing
mem
bers
of
a co
mm
issi
on.
Any
cha
nge
in p
artic
ipat
ion
in t
heco
mm
issi
on h
as t
o be
effe
cted
thr
ough
aby
law
am
endm
ent
by e
ach
part
icip
atin
glo
cal
gove
rnm
ent,
whi
ch r
equi
res
cons
ulta
tion
with
the
oth
er p
artie
sin
volv
ed.
Cha
nges
in
part
icip
atio
n m
ayaf
fect
the
exi
sten
ce o
f th
e co
mm
issi
on.
The
sha
re s
truc
ture
in
a co
rpor
atio
n is
fle
xibl
e.W
here
sha
reho
lder
s do
not
nee
d to
mak
esi
gnifi
cant
cap
ital
cont
ribut
ions
fo
r th
eco
an
dab
st
h t
bo
der
nu
nth
Whe
re
rtíc
ipat
ion
is n
eutr
al,
issu
ing
h eq
ual
votin
g an
dot
her
ribe
twee
ls
the
Pla
Yin
g fie
ld
Whe
re i
nves
tmen
t by
sha
reho
lder
s is
nec
essa
ry,
clas
ses
of p
refe
rred
sha
res
can
be u
sefu
l to
diffe
rent
iate
bet
wee
n sh
areh
olde
rs w
ith d
iffer
ent
leve
ls o
f in
vest
men
t, an
d vo
ting
right
s ca
n be
diffe
rent
for
diff
eren
t sh
are
clas
ses.
Eac
hsh
areh
olde
r's r
elat
ive
inve
stm
ent
can
also
be
refle
cted
tho
ugh
a di
vide
nd s
truc
ture
.
The
Art
icle
s an
d sh
areh
olde
rs,
agre
emen
t ca
nin
clud
e ru
les
and
limits
on
the
issu
ance
and
disp
osal
of
shar
es w
i 11
,w
hich
will
pro
tect
ag
;.th
e in
trod
uctio
n of
u
ers.
Ow
ners
hip
inte
rest
s ca
n be
cha
nged
by
the
tran
sfer
or
issu
ance
of
shar
es w
ithou
t af
fect
ing
the
gIþ{
s ex
iste
nce
or c
ontin
ued
A s
hare
hold
er a
gree
men
t ¡s
usu
ally
reco
mm
ende
d w
here
the
re is
mor
e th
an o
nesh
areh
olde
r in
a c
orpo
ratio
n. T
his
shou
ldco
ntai
n th
e pa
rtie
s, r
ight
s an
d ob
ligat
ions
, as
wel
l as
a c
lear
dis
pute
res
olut
ion
mec
hani
sm.
Set
ting
out
each
par
ties
right
s an
d ob
ligat
ions
in s
hare
hold
ers,
agr
eem
ent,
and
the
gove
rnan
ce r
ules
for
the
cor
pora
tion
in t
heA
rtic
les,
can
offe
r m
ore
flexi
bilit
y in
the
stru
ctur
e of
the
ent
erpr
ise,
with
out
the
need
for
num
erou
s by
law
s to
effe
ct t
hear
rang
emen
ts.
Ret
urn
onln
vest
men
tA
ny r
even
ues,
pro
fits
"n¿
Grr
"i ""
rnãã
ììin
curr
ed b
y a
com
mis
sion
are
the
pro
pert
yan
d re
spon
sibi
lity
of th
e lo
cal
gove
rnm
ents
that
for
med
the
com
mis
sion
. T
heag
reem
ent
betw
een
the
part
ies
will
dete
rmin
e th
e pr
opor
tions
in
whi
ch e
ach
loca
l go
vern
men
t ís
ent
itled
to
prof
its o
rre
spon
sibl
e fo
r lo
sses
.
A c
orpo
ratio
n's
finan
cial
rn"
nãl"m
*t i
, di
rtir,
.tfr
om t
he l
ocal
gov
ernm
ent.
Rev
enue
s, p
rofit
s an
dlo
sses
bel
ong
to t
he c
orpo
ratio
n,
and
can
bepa
ssed
on
to s
hare
hold
ers,
or
re_i
nves
ted
at t
hedi
scre
tion
of t
he b
oard
of
dire
ctor
s.
The
sha
reho
lder
s ca
n ag
ree
in a
dvan
ce t
o th
edi
vide
nd r
ight
s, if
any
, to
be
enjo
yed
by e
ach
shar
ehol
der.
Div
iden
d rig
hts
can
also
be
subj
ect
toI by
the
loca
l go
vern
men
ts.
Pag
e 3
of 7
18
Join
t C
omm
issi
on
othe
r ris
ks.
Whe
re r
isks
are
hig
her'
such
as
envi
ronm
enta
l ris
ks o
r th
e po
tent
ial p
enal
ties
unde
r th
e im
Pen
ding
new
Mun
iciP
al
Was
tew
ater
Reg
ulat
ions
, a
corp
orat
ion
wou
ld
prov
ide
a gr
eate
r de
gree
of
prot
ectio
n to
its
shar
ehol
ders
.
Sta
tuto
ry p
rote
ctio
n fr
om p
erso
nal l
iabi
lity
for
elec
ted
offic
ials
, of
ficer
s an
d lo
cal
gove
rnm
ent
empl
oyee
s w
ill e
xten
d to
cov
er
fuch
per
sons
act
ing
as c
omm
issi
on m
embe
rs
and
will
like
ly a
lso
exte
nd t
o su
ch p
erso
ns
actin
g as
dire
ctor
s or
offi
cers
of
corp
orat
ions
'
titri"
t r rr
" b"
*',t
tble
whe
re t
here
is a
low
ris
k fo
r at
trac
ting
pote
ntia
l lia
bilit
ies
or
..iri"
¿ b
y th
e co
rpor
atio
n an
d sh
areh
olde
rs in
a
limite
d lia
bilit
y co
mpa
ny a
re u
sual
ly n
ot p
erso
nally
fi"lf"
f"t
the
iebt
s, o
blig
atio
ns,
defa
ults
or
acts
of
rï"t
pt"v
bey
ond
the
amou
nt o
f sh
are
capi
tal
they
hav
e co
ntrib
uted
'
Pro
vide
d ris
k is
pro
perly
con
trol
led'
the
loca
l
gove
rnm
ent
shar
ehol
der
(and
the
refo
re t
he .
ãlec
tora
te)
is p
rote
cted
fro
m la
wsu
its a
nd o
ther
clai
ms
agai
nst
the
corp
orat
ion'
How
ever
' vi
cario
us
or e
ven
ãire
ct li
abili
ty f
or a
loca
l go
vern
men
t
shar
ehol
der
may
aris
e w
here
tha
t sh
areh
olde
r
,"i"¡
nt d
irect
con
trol
of
the
serv
ices
per
form
ed b
y
tie c
orpo
ratio
n. V
icar
ious
lia
bilit
y is
ther
efor
e le
ss
likel
y to
aris
e w
here
the
re a
re s
ever
al l
ocal
gou"
rnt"
n, s
hare
hold
ers
in a
cor
pora
tion
who
ãolle
ctiv
ely
ensu
re t
hat
no s
hare
hold
er u
ndul
y
Ã.*
p"""
ti""
, 'il
l "tq
uire
debt
s' t
ax o
blig
atio
ns'
lega
ltlai
ms
and
othe
r co
mm
itmen
tt: ^j
:kll.
- -
inte
rfer
es w
ith o
r ta
kes
cont
rol o
f th
e
corp
orat
ion'
s se
rvic
es.
Sta
tuto
ry l
iabi
litie
s ca
n be
impo
sed
pers
onal
ly o
n
dire
ctor
s an
d of
ficer
s fo
r a
num
ber
of m
atte
rs'
such
as
for
unpa
id w
ages
, ta
xes
or e
nviro
nmen
tal
rem
edia
tion
cost
s. T
his
is t
rue
for
dire
ctor
s of
all
corp
orat
ions
in
Brit
ish
Col
umbi
a'
the
loca
l go
vern
men
ts t
hat
esta
blis
hed
it'
the
loca
l go
vern
men
ts a
re r
espo
nsib
le f
or
all a
cts,
def
aults
and
om
issi
ons
of th
e
com
mis
sion
, an
d an
y lia
bilit
ies
incu
rred
by
a
com
mis
sion
are
dire
ct l
iabi
litie
s of
the
loca
l
gove
rnm
ents
.
The
refo
re,
the
part
icip
atin
g th
e lo
cal
sof
as w
ell
incl
udin
g en
viro
nmen
tal
liabi
litie
s'
g---
--".
tut"
t a
ottlt
nßsi
on a
cts
as a
n ag
ent
oftia
bilit
Y a
nd it
s
tran
sfer
Ã."
tp*"
ti."
*¡ll
have
gre
ater
fle
xibi
lity
in
secu
ring
nece
ssar
y fu
nds
for
its o
pera
tions
'
-."r
p"r"
t'r"
.t" b
"tt"
* in
depe
nden
tly
on t
he
lend
ing
mar
kets
, an
d w
ill n
ot b
e lim
ited
to
borr
owin
g th
roug
h th
e M
unic
ipal
Fin
ance
Aut
horit
y. B
orro
win
g po
wer
s an
d th
e ab
ility
to
gran
t se
curit
y ov
er a
ny a
sset
s, a
nd li
mita
tions
ih"r
"on
can
be s
et o
ut i
n th
e A
rtic
les'
Gen
eral
ly,
a co
rpor
atio
n ca
nnot
app
ly f
or o
r
rece
ive
gran
ts u
nder
the
pro
vinc
ial
gran
ts
legi
slat
iãn;
how
ever
, pa
rtic
ipat
ing
loca
l
no=
vern
men
ts w
ould
stil
l be
elig
ible
'
inde
pend
ently
, an
d el
ecte
d of
ficia
ls c
anno
t
dele
gate
bor
row
ing
Pow
ers
to a
com
m¡s
sion
. A
ny b
orro
win
g ne
eded
for
the
com
mis
sion
's o
pera
tions
will
hav
e to
be
achi
eved
by
the
loca
l go
vern
men
t th
roug
h
the
Mun
icip
al F
inan
ce A
utho
rity'
ln
addi
tion,
loc
al g
over
nmen
ts w
ould
nee
d to
obta
in a
ppro
val f
or b
orro
win
g fr
om b
oth
the
elec
tora
te a
nd t
he ln
spec
tor
of
n co
mm
issi
on c
anno
t bo
rrow
Bor
row
ing
Pag
e 4
of7
19
Join
t C
omm
issi
on
A c
omm
issi
on's
fin
anci
al s
tate
men
ts W
illfo
rm p
art
of t
he f
inan
cial
sta
tem
ents
of
the
part
icip
atin
g lo
cal
gove
rnm
ents
, an
d ar
eto
the
sam
e ru
les.
Aud
ited
finan
cial
sta
tem
ents
will
nee
d to
be
prep
ared
ann
ually
in
acco
rdañ
ce w
ith t
he B
usin
ess
Cor
pora
tions
A
ct,
and
pres
ente
d at
pub
lic m
eetin
gof
eac
h lo
cal
gove
rnm
ent
shar
ehol
der.
Man
agem
ent,
Gov
erna
nce
&ls
sues
Loca
l go
vern
men
ts u
sual
ly a
ppoi
nt e
lect
eãof
ficia
ls a
nd/o
r st
aff
mem
bers
to
com
mis
sion
s. A
Com
mis
sion
m
ay e
stab
lish
advi
sory
com
mitt
ees
for
acce
ss t
o sp
ecia
lex
pert
ise.
A c
omm
issi
on is
usu
ally
sub
ject
to
mor
eov
ersi
ght
by e
lect
ed o
ffici
als,
res
ultin
g ín
mor
e nu
mer
ous
mee
tings
and
incr
ease
dw
orkl
oads
for
suc
h of
ficia
ls.
Whi
le s
hare
hold
ers
own
the
corp
orat
ion,
ar
tt *i
tyan
d re
spon
sibi
lity
for
oper
atio
ns i
s de
lega
ted
toth
e B
oard
of
Dire
ctor
s an
d O
ffice
rs.
lf pe
rmitt
ed t
o do
so
by t
he A
rtic
les,
a B
oard
of
Dire
ctor
s ca
n ap
poin
t ex
tern
a,l
dire
ctor
s w
ithsp
ecia
list
expe
rienc
e. lt
is m
ore
usua
l th
at t
helo
cal
gove
rnm
ents
res
erve
the
rig
ht t
o m
ake
all
appo
intm
ents
to
the
Boa
rd.
Con
flict
s of
inte
rest
will
nee
d to
be
cons
ider
edw
hen
sele
ctin
g B
oard
mem
bers
. T
he B
oard
can
incl
ude
elec
ted
offic
ials
, m
unic
ipal
offi
cers
or
empl
oyee
s as
wel
l as
out
side
per
sons
and
com
mun
ity m
embe
rs.
We
do n
ot n
orm
ally
reco
mm
end
that
ele
cted
offi
bial
s ac
t as
D¡r
ecto
rs,
as th
is c
reat
es c
onfli
cts
of in
tere
st b
etw
een
thei
rdu
ties
to a
ct in
the
best
int
eres
t of
the
corp
orat
ion
and
in t
he b
est
inte
rest
s of
the
ele
ctor
ate.
A c
lear
recr
uitm
ent
and
appo
intm
ent
polic
y sh
ould
be
esta
blis
hed
to a
void
pro
blem
s, a
nd p
rovi
sion
sde
alin
g w
ith c
onfli
ct c
an a
lso
be in
clud
ed i
n th
eA
rtic
les.
The
pow
ers
of D
irect
ors
and
Offi
cers
can
be
rest
ricte
d in
the
Art
icle
s, r
eser
ving
cer
tain
pow
ers
for
exer
cise
by
the
shar
ehol
ders
or
only
with
shar
ehol
der
appr
oval
. T
his
help
s sh
areh
olde
rsre
tain
rea
sona
ble
cont
rols
ove
r th
e co
rpor
atio
n,s
oblig
atio
ns.
The
Art
ícle
s ca
n al
so p
rovi
de t
he s
hare
hold
ers
with
flexi
ble
met
hods
for
the
app
oint
men
t an
d re
mov
alof
Dire
ctor
s.
Dep
endi
ng o
n th
e A
rtic
les
and
any
shar
ehol
ders
' ag
reem
ent,
each
sha
reho
lder
in
a co
rpor
atio
n m
ay h
ave
a ch
oice
as
to w
hoth
eir
appo
inte
e(s)
to
the
Boa
rd w
ill b
e.P
laci
ng c
omm
unity
mem
bers
on
the
Boa
rdca
n fa
cilit
ate
tran
spar
ency
and
acc
ount
abili
ty.
lncl
udin
g re
pres
enta
tives
of
loca
l go
vern
men
tor
loca
l go
vern
men
t of
ficer
s fa
cílit
ates
con
trol
over
the
inve
stm
ent
and
asse
ts o
f th
eco
rpor
atio
n,
and
brin
gs a
war
enes
s of
issu
es,
obje
ctiv
es a
nd p
olíc
ies
of th
e lo
cal
gove
rnm
ent
to t
he B
oard
. M
anag
ers
and
staf
f ca
n al
so a
ct a
s lia
ison
s be
twee
n th
eB
oard
and
the
loc
al g
over
nmen
t, in
crea
sing
the
effic
ienc
y of
dec
isio
n-m
akin
g.
Loca
l go
vern
men
t co
ntro
l can
be
achi
eved
thro
ugh
the
Art
icle
s of
the
cor
pora
tion,
cove
ring
issu
es s
uch
as s
hare
hold
er a
ppro
val,
boar
d co
mpo
sitio
n, c
ompa
ny o
pera
tion,
cont
ract
s, a
gree
men
ts a
nd b
orro
win
g.
A c
orpo
ratio
n is
abl
e to
ope
rate
mor
ein
depe
nden
tly t
han
a co
mm
issi
on, w
ith le
ssin
put
and
few
er o
ngoi
ng r
evie
ws
by e
lect
edof
ficia
ls b
eing
nee
ded.
Thi
s m
eans
tha
t th
eco
rpor
atio
n's
day-
to-d
ay o
pera
tions
are
not
ham
pere
d by
the
high
er le
vel o
f ov
ersi
ght,
and
disp
utes
and
dis
agre
emen
ts a
rem
inim
ized
. A
dditi
onal
ly,
a co
rpor
atio
n w
ith a
dedi
cate
d fu
ll-tim
e m
anag
emen
t te
am c
ould
be m
anda
ted
to in
nova
tivel
y de
velo
p th
eop
erat
ions
and
rev
enue
sou
rces
and
wou
ldlik
ely
have
few
er t
ime
and
regu
lato
ryco
nstr
aint
s th
an a
com
mi
Pag
e 5
of 7
20
Join
t C
omm
issi
on
lf-r"
æp.
".1
*qui
rem
ents
tha
t ap
ply
to lo
cal
gove
rnm
ents
and
com
mis
sion
s do
not
app
ly
to c
orP
orat
ions
'
Any
spe
cial
leg
isla
tion
or r
egul
atio
ns
appl
icab
le t
o th
e pr
ojec
t, su
ch à
s th
e
impe
ndin
g ne
w M
unic
ipal
Was
te W
ater
Reg
ulat
ions
, ar
e eq
ually
app
licab
le to
bot
h
arra
ngem
ents
.
Th"
tppt
t f
"f th
e ln
spec
tor
of M
unic
ipal
ities
is
requ
iied
to f
orm
a c
orpo
ratio
n' C
ondi
tions
of
appr
oval
incl
ude
a re
quire
men
t th
at t
he A
rtic
les'
*f,i.
tt tt"
the
rule
s th
at g
over
n th
e co
nduc
t of
the
corp
orat
ion
and
its s
hare
hold
ers,
sho
uld
addr
ess
the
follo
win
g m
atte
rs:
- H
oldi
ng o
f an
ann
ual i
nfor
mat
ion
mee
ting
open
to t
he P
ublic
;-
AP
Poi
ntm
ent
of a
n au
dito
r an
d th
e
prep
arat
ion
of a
nnua
l fin
anci
al s
tate
men
ts;
- N
o am
endm
ent
to t
he A
rtic
les
with
out
the
aPP
rova
l of
the
lnsP
ecto
r;
- N
o fo
rmat
ion
of a
sub
sidi
ary
with
out
both
shar
ehol
der
and
the
lnsp
ecto
r's a
ppro
val;
- A
vaila
bilit
y of
the
audi
ted
finan
cial
stat
emen
ts a
nd A
rtic
les
for
publ
ic
insp
ectio
n at
eac
h lo
cal
gove
rnm
ent
shar
ehol
der's
offi
ce;
- S
hare
hold
er a
ppro
val
of d
ispo
sal
of a
sset
s;
and
- S
ettin
g of
fin
anci
al y
ear-
end
at D
ecem
ber
31.
f*ry
.ppr
oual
req
uire
men
t th
at a
pplie
s to
a lo
cal
gove
rnm
ent
part
icip
atin
g in
a
com
mis
sion
, w
ill a
PP
IY e
qual
lY to
a
com
mis
sion
as
wel
l, be
caus
e a
com
mis
sion
is n
ot a
seP
arat
e le
gal
entit
Y.
Acc
ordi
ngly
, a
com
mis
sion
will
be
subj
ect to
all a
pplic
able
rul
es s
et o
ut in
the
CC
and
LGA
. F
or e
xam
ple,
a m
unic
ipal
ity w
ill n
ot b
e
able
to
disp
ose
of p
rope
rty
with
out
mee
t¡ng
the
notic
e re
quire
men
ts i
n s'
94 o
f th
e C
C,
a
Reg
iona
l D
istr
ict
that
wis
hes
to d
ispo
se o
f
land
and
impr
ovem
ents
mus
t fir
st o
ffer
them
to
the
publ
ic f
or a
cqui
sitio
n un
der
s.18
6 of
the
LG
, an
d a
Reg
iona
l D
istr
ict
can
only
dis
pose
of
sew
age
wor
ks i
n co
mpl
ianc
e
with
the
lim
itatio
ns s
peci
fied
in s
' 190
of
the
LGA
.
App
rova
ls a
nd
lnte
rnal
Con
trol
s
ffin th
" ,r
tutp
ti- t
hat
the
serv
ices
to
be p
rovi
ded
bv a
cor
pora
tion
are
bein
g pr
ovid
ed w
ithin
loc
al
Pro
pert
y ta
x ex
empt
ions
may
be
avai
labl
e fo
r a
corp
orat
ion
unde
r a
part
nerin
g ag
reem
ent
with
a
loca
l go
vern
men
t.
Rs
the
prop
erty
man
aged
by
a co
mm
issi
on
will
like
ly b
e he
ld a
nd o
wne
d by
loca
l
gove
rnm
ents
, su
ch p
rope
rtie
s w
ill n
ot
norm
ally
be
subj
ect
to t
axat
ion.
Whe
re t
here
are
mul
tiPle
ow
ners
of
prop
ertie
s th
at a
re m
anag
ed b
y a
sing
le
com
mis
sion
, a
verif
icat
ion
exer
cise
will
be
need
ed t
o es
tabl
ish
whi
ch p
rope
rtie
s ar
e
exem
pt f
rom
tax
atio
n, a
nd w
hich
are
not
'
il.or
porr
tion t
ty b
e fin
ance
d ei
ther
thr
ough
capi
tal
inve
stm
ent
(sha
re i
ssue
s) o
r de
bt f
inan
cing
(See
sec
tion
on B
orro
win
g)'
À c
omm
issi
on w
ill h
ave
to r
ecei
ve a
ll its
fund
ing
from
the
loca
l go
vern
men
ts t
hat
are
part
ic¡P
atin
g.
Pag
e 6
of 7
21
("Jo
int
Com
mis
sion
Reg
ulat
ory
Req
uire
men
tsA
s st
ated
ear
lier,
a c
omm
issi
on w
ill b
esu
bjec
t to
all
the
appr
oval
and
reg
ulat
ory
requ
irem
ents
im
pose
d up
on l
ocal
gove
rnm
ents
, as
wel
l as
labo
ur l
egis
latio
n,pr
ivac
y le
gisl
atio
n an
d ot
her
spec
ific
regu
latio
ns a
pplic
able
to
the
type
of
ente
rpris
e th
e co
rpor
atio
n ca
rrie
s on
.
A c
orpo
ratio
n ne
eds
to c
ompl
y w
ith v
ario
usst
atut
es a
nd r
egul
atio
ns.
Som
e ex
ampl
es in
clud
e:-
Bus
ines
s C
orpo
rotio
ns
Acf
, w
hich
set
s ou
tva
rious
req
uire
men
ts o
n m
aint
aini
ng a
n of
fice,
corp
orat
e re
cord
s, r
equi
red
filin
gs,
annu
alm
eetin
gs a
nd f
inan
cial
dis
clos
ure,
am
ong
othe
rs;
- F
reed
om o
f ln
form
otío
n on
d pr
otec
tion
ofP
rivoc
y A
ct, w
hich
may
or
may
not
app
ly t
o a
corp
orat
ion
that
is p
artly
ow
ned
by a
loca
lgo
vern
men
t;-
Labo
ur l
egis
latio
n; a
nd-
Oth
er s
peci
fic r
egul
atio
ns a
pplic
able
to
the
type
of
ente
rpris
e th
e co
rpor
atio
n ca
rrie
s on
,su
ch a
s th
e E
nviro
nmen
tal
Mon
ogem
ent
Act
and
Mun
icip
al S
ewog
e R
egul
otio
n fo
r se
wag
edi
spos
al f
acili
ties.
Bec
ause
the
ser
vice
s un
der
cons
ider
atio
n ar
ese
wag
e tr
eatm
ent
serv
ices
, th
ese
fall
outs
ide
the
ambi
t of
the
lJtil
ities
Com
mis
sion
Act
. A
corp
orat
ion
will
be
able
to
set
fees
and
rat
esap
plic
able
to
such
ser
vice
s w
ithou
t ne
ed f
or a
byla
w.
A c
omm
issi
on w
ill o
nly
be a
ble
to s
etsu
ch r
ates
bas
ed o
n by
law
s ad
opte
d by
the
part
icip
atin
g lo
cal
gove
rnm
ents
as
this
pow
erca
nnot
be
dele
gate
d to
a c
omm
issi
on.
Sta
ffre
quire
men
tsA
com
mis
sion
can
not
ente
r in
to d
irect
empl
oym
ent
cont
ract
s. T
here
fore
, al
lem
ploy
men
t co
ntra
cts
for
com
mis
síon
pers
onne
l will
be
betw
een
the
loca
lgo
vern
men
ts a
nd t
he e
mpl
oyee
, or
the
loca
lgo
vern
men
ts w
ill s
econ
d th
eir
staf
fm
embe
rs to
the
com
mis
sion
, or
the
loca
lgo
vern
men
ts w
ill h
ave
to c
arry
out
var
ious
func
tions
for
an
on b
ehal
f of
the
com
mis
sion
.
A c
orpo
ratio
n ca
n di
rect
ly e
nter
int
o em
ploy
men
tco
ntra
cts.
The
dev
olut
ion
of a
cur
rent
loca
l go
vern
men
tse
rvic
e to
a m
unic
ipal
cor
pora
tion
may
rai
sesu
cces
sors
hip,
ben
efits
and
pen
sion
s is
sues
for
unio
nize
d st
aff.
Whí
lst
a co
rpor
atio
n is
not
obl
iged
to r
ecog
nise
pas
t se
rvic
e w
ith a
loca
l go
vern
men
tun
der
com
mon
law
, th
e co
rpor
atio
n m
ay w
ish
todo
thi
s in
ord
er t
o en
sure
acc
epta
nce
ofth
eem
ploy
men
t by
the
per
sonn
el a
s w
ell
as s
eam
less
tran
sfer
of
oper
atio
ns.
A c
orpo
ratio
n ca
n en
gage
exc
lude
d st
aff
with
out
rais
ing
succ
esso
rshi
p is
sues
.
A c
orpo
ratio
n ha
s gr
eate
r fle
xibí
lity
in s
taffi
ngan
d hu
man
res
ourc
e m
anag
emen
t th
an a
com
mis
sion
.
Div
estin
gas
sets
A c
omm
issi
on w
ill n
ot b
e ab
le t
o di
spos
e of
any
asse
ts o
r pr
oper
ty f
orm
ing
part
of
the
oper
atio
ns m
anag
ed b
y th
e co
mm
issi
on.
All
prop
erty
dis
posa
ls w
ill h
ave
to b
e ef
fect
edby
the
loca
l go
vern
men
ts i
nvol
ved,
in
co-
oper
atio
n an
d in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
le p
rovi
sion
s of
the
CC
and
LG
A.
It is
sim
pler
to
sell
or d
ispo
se o
f th
e en
terp
rise
thro
ugh
the
sale
of
asse
ts o
r sh
ares
of
a
corp
orat
ion.
Any
lim
itatio
ns o
n su
ch d
ispo
sal
right
s w
ould
be
cont
aine
d in
the
Art
ícle
s of
the
corp
orat
ion.
lf th
e lo
cal
gove
rnm
ents
inv
olve
d in
the
vent
ure
even
tual
ly w
ish
to s
ell th
e en
terp
rise
or p
art
of it
, a
corp
orat
ion
stru
ctur
e w
ill m
ake
this
pro
cess
muc
h si
mpl
er.
Thi
s w
ill m
ake
any
futu
re p
rivat
isat
ion
poss
ibili
ties
mor
eat
trac
tive.
Pag
eT o
f7
22
Re ort MUNrcrPALrry "
North
wqrruarylt,¿vto File: S3S5_o2CVRD
c-owichan valley Regional District - central sector Liquid wasteManagement Ptan (CSLWMP) Steering CommitteeJohn MacKay, Director of Engineering and operations Endorsed orÞJUB Lagoons Treatment plant Capacity
Date
To
From
Subject
lssue
At the last CSLWMP Steering Committee meeting, direction was given to do a technical study on thecost for interim improvements to the JUB to create additional capãcity.
Background
The summary of capacity units used and owned, as well as growth of units over the past 5 years, isshown in the table below:
5 YEARS
[ocationDecember 31,
2006(# of units)
December 3f.,z0tl(# of unitsf
5 YearGrowth
YearcCapacity @Last 5 Years
GrowthOwned Used Owned Used Excess
City ofDuncan
4,445 3,6494,44L
ßt.t3yol3,896
(32.M%l 545247
(7.4%lv¡l ttNorthCowichan
7,665 5,9937,659
(s3.6s%l6,390
(s3.2t%l L,268397
í.3%/vrl t6Eagle
Heichts7,O23 755
987
rc.92yol745
/.6.20%l242
-10ß%lvrl 15
CowichanBav
846 754882
(6.!8%l813
(6.77o/ol 6949
ft.3%/vrl 7
CowichanTribes
155 t52 296Q.oe%l
166(1.38%) 130
t4(t.9%lvrl 46
TOTAI.S: t4,t34 It,3l3 14,264(tooyol
t2,Oton00%l 2,254 697
of 679 units over the past 5 years at a growth ofPlant has a capacity of about 16 years withouthat Cowichan Bay has about 7 years of availablerth Cowichan has 16 years, Eagle Heights has 16years and Cowichan Tribes has 46 years.
one method to remedy this unbalance would be for the parties to sell Cowichan Bay capacity units.
Another method would be to re-examine the capacity of the existing JUB Treatment plant. ln August2011, Clay Reitsma, Manager of Engineering (lnfrasiructure and Eñvironmentj, analyzed the capacityof the JUB and estimated a theoretical increãse of 1,927 units. This was mainly becãuse when iheoriginal capacity was estimated in the mid 1990's, the number of personr p", nor", based on
jpmjan2l_13rvb CVRD JUB Lagoons Treatment plant Capacity
7030 Trans Canada Highway, Box27g, Duncan, BC V9L 3X4Ph 250-7 46-3100 Fax 250-746-31 33 www. northcowichan. ca
COWICHANJanuary 21,2013
23
census data, was 2.s people per home. currently the census data is in the order or 2'2 people per
home, and droPPing.
As part of the 49 year lease extension between the city of Duncan, North cowichan' cowichan Tribes
and Certificate of pòisess¡on holc ers, thã Municipality undertook a review of the Lagoons to determine
if capacity could be ìÃcreased by 130 uniis iucn inat ôow¡chan Tribes could be given 130 units as part
of the settlement for the lease extension'
The Augus t2oll review recommended that further analysis is required_prior to an increase of capacity
of this magnitude (1,g27 units) as there could be some iñcreased ¡sk of non-compliance due to
uncertaint! in the actual number of persons per home'
ln particular, it was recommended:
j. Review of census data for all contributing jurisdictions to get a better.handle on the actual
peopte per unit (ppu) count "no
nrro"iót equivatent reðidential units (ERU) connected'
2. Review the performance of the treatment system for cBoDS conversion, ammonia conversion
and total PhosPhorous removal'
The cost to retain Delcan (the JUB treatment plant designer) to undertake this review would be
approximatelY $10,000 - $15,000.
Recommendation
That the Duncan/North Cowichan JUB be requested to undertake a capacity review of the JUB to
determine if add¡tioÁâi capacity can be provid'ed to the users of the treatment system without
undertaking imProvements-
7030 Trans Canada Highway, Box 278' Duncan, BC VgL 3X4
pñ zso-z¿o-s100 Fai250-746-3133 www.northcowichan'ca
24
Cap
ital
EM
BC
l JU
B D
ike
Ups
rade
JUB
D¡s
¡nfe
ct¡o
n S
yste
m
Uos
rade
Stu
dvJU
B E
fflue
nt S
ewer
Rou
t¡ng
Pre
deci
enJU
B O
utfa
ll O
cean
orgr
aphi
cS
tudv
CS
LWM
P A
mm
end
(ST
P S
ite &
Effl
lrrie
lJU
B O
dour
Con
trol
Stu
dvE
nerg
y R
ecov
ery
Fun
d¡ng
Ann
licat
ion
Gov
erna
nce
Stu
dvC
apac
ity
Ass
essm
ent
2013
JU
B B
udge
t B
reak
dow
nB
udge
t (S
umm
ary)
Rol
led-
over
fro
m 2
012.
Rol
led-
over
fro
m 2
012.
Rol
led-
over
fro
m 2
012.
Rol
led-
over
fro
m 2
012.
New
for
201
3.N
ew f
or 2
013.
S 1
,4s6
,964
$ 8
11,3
09 S
o¿
s,ss
s5
L,2L
6,96
4 S
s11
,309
S 4
o5,6
ssS
2o,
oooS
$
zo,o
oo
S s
o,oo
oS
S s
o,oo
o
S s
o,oo
oS
S s
o,oo
o
S lo
o,oo
oS
S lo
o,oo
o
S 2
o,oo
oS
S 2
o,oo
o
S 1
,040
,926
S 7
zg,L
ro $
¡fl,
sro
S L
,ozo
,s76
5
729,
Lto
S 2
91,4
66ss
sss
sss
s5s
sss
sS
2o,
3soS
S
2o,
3so
s 27
s,00
0 s
S 2
o,oo
o S
S s
o,oo
o S
S s
o,oo
o S
s 10
0,00
0 s
S 2
o,oo
o s
S 2
o,oo
o S
S l
s,oo
o S
loca
l G
ovt
lncr
ease
Sha
re
Ove
r 20
12
s 27
5,00
0
S z
o,oo
o
S s
o,oo
o
S s
o,oo
o
S lo
o,oo
o
S 2
o,oo
o
S 2
o,oo
oS
ls.
ooo
Out
side
Fun
d¡ng
1810
4t20
13
11:4
6 A
MI
of 1
25
Ob¡
ect
Cat
egor
Cat
egor
y N
ame
Te¡
m¡n
ated
lype
Acc
ount
N
umbe
rA
ccou
nt
Nam
e
4412
41]
.01
JUB
5%
AD
MIN
IST
RA
TIO
N
fN/A
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
25-2
4LIO
T44
L2
1100
422
0t12
00 4
220t
1250
422
0112
90 4
220r
1400
422
0L21
10 4
220t
2II7
42
20t
2113
422
0L2L
r5 4
220L
2125
422
0t2r
z9 4
2201
-22
25 4
2ZO
t25
31 4
220r
2534
422
0r25
81 4
2201
2592
422
0L26
t0 4
220L
2700
422
0t27
40 4
220t
2743
422
0t27
44 4
220!
2760
422
0L27
60 4
2207
2805
422
0129
00 4
220r
44tL
422
0r44
20 4
2207
5222
422
0r52
30 4
2207
5320
422
0L56
50 4
220L
5930
422
0t
2700
422
02
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
N
DIT
UR
ES
EX
PE
N
DIT
UR
ES
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
R
ES
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
IIUR
ES
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
N
DIT
UR
ES
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
R
ES
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
EX
PE
N
DIT
UR
ES
EX
PE
ND
ITU
R
ES
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
25-2
4220
1-t!0
025
-2-4
220t
-L20
025
-2-4
220t
-L25
025
-242
20L-
L?90
25-2
4220
L-L4
0025
-242
20t-
21t0
25-2
-422
07-2
rLr
25-2
4220
1-2r
L325
-242
20r-
2tts
25-2
-422
01-2
125
25-2
4220
r-2t
2925
-242
20r-
2225
25-2
4220
7-25
3r25
-242
20L-
2534
25-2
4220
L-25
AL
25-2
4220
t-25
922s
-242
20t-
26t1
25-2
4220
t-27
0025
-242
20L-
2740
25-2
-422
0L-2
743
25-2
4220
t-27
4425
-242
20r-
2760
25-2
4220
!-27
6025
-242
20]-
2805
25-2
4220
r-29
0025
-242
20].4
4tL
25-2
4220
1442
025
-242
20t-
5222
25-2
4220
L-52
3025
-242
20t-
5120
25-2
-422
0t-5
650
25-2
4220
L-59
30
25-2
-422
02-2
700
25-?
-???
?7-2
700
25-?
-???
??-2
700
2s-?
-???
??-2
700
2s-?
-???
??-2
700
2s-?
-???
??-2
700
s37,
40s
s37.
40s
s20.
854
s73.
s80
s1.8
70ss
,960
s41,
070 So s0
S74
0ss
10s7
80ss
,8s0
s110
s7s0
SsS
os6
,790
ss7.
730
s301
.439
s10.
170
s90,
100
s1,9
10 s0 So s0
s10.
200
s14,
5r.0
s12.
440
s3,8
10s7
9.¿
t40 s0
s1,0
60 s0S
7.36
9
s749
,622
S91
0s9
10
s20-
000
s20,
æo
s50.
000
s50,
000
ss0,
000
ss0,
000
s100
.000
s100
.æ0
s20.
000
s20,
0(x)
JUB
SE
WE
R T
RE
AM
TN
ET
P
TA
NT
M
AIN
TE
NA
N
#N/A
JUB
SE
WE
R T
RE
AM
TN
ET
P
TA
NT
M
AIN
TE
NA
N
#N/A
JUB
SE
WE
R T
RE
AM
TN
ET
P
TA
NT
M
AIN
TE
NA
N
#N/A
IUB
SE
WE
R T
RE
AM
TN
ET
P
TA
NT
M
AIN
TE
NA
N
#N/A
IUB
SE
WE
R T
RE
AM
TN
ET
P
TA
NT
M
AIN
TE
NA
N
#N/A
JUB
SE
WE
R T
RE
AM
TN
ET
P
TA
NT
M
AIN
TE
NA
N
#N/A
JUB
SE
WE
R T
RE
AM
TN
ET
P
LAN
T M
AIN
TE
NA
N
#N/A
JUB
SE
WE
R T
RE
AM
TN
ET
P
LAN
T M
AIN
TE
NA
N
#N/A
JUB
SE
WE
R T
RE
AM
TN
ET
PLA
NI
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
T
RE
AM
TN
ET
PLA
NT
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
T
RE
AM
TN
ET
PLA
NT
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
TR
EA
MT
NE
T
PLA
NT
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
TR
EA
MT
NE
T
PLA
NT
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
TR
EA
MT
NE
T
PI.A
NT
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
TR
EA
MT
NE
T
PI-
AN
T
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AIU
B S
EW
ER
TR
EA
MT
NE
T
PT
AN
T
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AIU
B S
EW
ER
TR
EA
MT
NE
T
PT
AN
T
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
TR
EA
MT
NE
T
PT
AN
T
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
TR
EA
MIN
ET
PLA
NT
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
TR
EA
MT
NE
T
PLA
NT
MA
INIE
NA
N #
N/A
JUB
SE
WE
R T
RE
AM
TN
ET
PLA
NT
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
T
RE
AM
TN
ET
PLA
NT
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
T
RE
AM
TN
ET
PLA
NT
MA
INT
EN
AN
flN
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
TR
EA
MT
NE
T
PT
AN
T
MA
INT
EN
AN
flN
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
T
RE
AM
TN
ET
PLA
NT
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
TR
EA
MT
NE
T
PLA
NT
MA
INT
EN
AN
Ë
N/A
JUB
SE
WE
R T
RE
AM
TN
ET
P
IAN
T M
AIN
TE
NA
N
#N/A
JUB
SE
WE
R T
RE
AM
TN
ET
P
I.AN
T M
AIN
TE
NA
N
SN
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
TR
EA
MT
NE
T
PT
AN
T
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
TR
EA
MT
NE
T
PT
AN
T
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AIU
B S
EW
ER
TR
EA
MT
NE
T
PI-
AN
T
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/AJU
B S
EW
ER
TR
EA
MT
NE
T
PT
AN
T
MA
INT
EN
AN
#N
/A
AT
AR
M M
ON
ITO
RIN
G
#N/A
JUB
5%
Adm
¡n:M
un
Adm
¡n C
harÂ
eJU
B 5
% A
DM
INIS
TR
AT
ION
JUB
ST
P M
tce:
Sal
ar¡e
sJU
B S
TP
Mtc
e:W
ases
JUB
ST
P M
tce:
Was
es O
/TJU
B S
TP
Mtc
e:W
aEes
P/T
IUB
ST
P M
tce:
Em
Dlo
ver
Con
tr¡b
ut¡o
nJU
B S
TP
Mtc
e:T
rave
l C
onv/
sem
¡n¿
rJU
B s
TP
Mtc
e:R
eR¡s
t C
onv/
Sem
¡nar
IUB
ST
P M
tce:
Res
¡st
Tra
¡n/C
ours
eJU
B s
TP
Mtc
e:T
rave
l E
xo B
usin
ess
lU B
sT
P M
tce:
Fre
isht
&C
our¡
erIU
B S
TP
Mtc
e:P
erm
¡ts&
Fee
sIU
B S
IP M
tce:
Mem
bers
hiÞ
JUB
ST
P M
tce:
Pho
ne C
hare
esJU
B S
TP
Mtc
e:C
ells
&P
aÂer
sIU
B s
TP
Mtc
e:U
ser
Fee
s W
ater
IUB
ST
P M
tce:
L¡Â
ht&
Pow
erJU
B S
TP
Mtc
e:R
enta
l la
nd/B
ldJU
B s
TP
Mtc
e:C
ontr
act
JUB
ST
P M
tce:
Con
tinee
ncie
sJU
B S
TP
Mtc
e:Li
qu¡d
Was
te D
¡sD
JUB
ST
P M
tce:
Sol
¡d W
aste
Dis
DJU
B s
TP
Mtc
e:Le
Âal
Fee
sJU
B S
TP
Mtc
e;Le
sal
Fee
sJU
B S
TP
Mtc
e:G
ener
al
lns
IUB
ST
P M
tce:
Oth
er
Pro
f S
erv
IUB
sT
P M
tce:
Mun
Equ
lD R
enta
lJU
B S
TP
Mtc
e:S
tore
s&O
verh
ead
IUB
ST
P M
tce:
Sal
t&C
hem
ical
sJU
B S
TP
Mtc
e:G
rave
l/San
d/S
oil
JUB
ST
P M
tce:
Veh
¡cle
Fue
lJU
B S
TP
Mtc
e:S
mal
l T
ools
JUB
sT
P M
tce:
Oth
er
Suo
Dl¡e
sIU
B S
EW
ER
T
RE
AM
TN
ET
P
I.AN
T M
AIN
TE
NA
NC
E
Ala
rm M
on¡t
or¡n
s:C
ontr
act
AI.A
RM
MO
NIT
OR
ING
IUB
Dis
infe
ctio
n S
vste
m U
DÂ
rade
Stu
dvJU
B D
isin
fect
ion
Svs
tem
UD
r¡ad
e S
tudv
JUB
Effl
uent
Sew
er R
out¡
ne
Pre
des¡
Ân
JUB
Effl
uent
S
eweÌ
Rou
tinc
Pre
desi
sn
IUB
Out
fall
Oce
anor
sraD
h¡c
Stu
dvJL
JB O
utfa
ll O
cean
orsr
aDh¡
c S
tudv
CS
LWM
P A
mm
end
(ST
P S
ite &
Effl
trr
ie)
cs[w
MP
Am
men
d {s
Tp
Site
& E
fft t
rr¡s
l
JUB
Odo
ur C
ontr
ol S
tudv
IUB
Odo
u¡ C
ontr
ol S
tudv
26