music controllers
DESCRIPTION
Music ControllersTRANSCRIPT
-
Music Controllers: To Map or Not To Map? Timo Preece on Mar 31, 2015 in AUDIO HARDWARE 0 comments
Are you distracted by too many choices when it comes to mapping your
MIDI controller to your DAW? Exerting too much effort on non-musical
tasks? Timo Preece explores auto and manual mapping in-depth.
Limitless Possibility and Strategic Planning
Not unlike the multiple roles computer musicians fill, many modern commercially available
hardware control devices are being designed with similar multipurpose, multitasking functionality
in mind. Controllers such as Abletons Push, the Novation Launchpad and the Akai APC Series are
well thought-out, versatile studio/performance tools.
Units like these offer users seemingly limitless possibility for creative potential straight out of the
box, simply plug and play. Push is an excellent example. It is an all-in-one Swiss Army knife that
acts as a non-linear clip launcher, melodic step sequencer, keyboard, mixer, device browser, effects
control system, drum machine and a plethora of other functions for controlling Ableton Live.
However, as I have witnessed in my own performance, the need for a limited set of choices in a
custom setup is significantly important. Without careful strategic planning, setting up boundaries
ahead of time, I am often distracted by too many choices and exert too much effort on non-musical
tasks. It is easy to spend my time exploring options and getting lost navigating menus, banks and
sub-banks.
http://www.askaudiomag.com/author/timo-preecehttp://www.askaudiomag.com/category/audio-hardwarehttp://www.askaudiomag.com/articles/music-controllers-to-map-or-not-to-map#comments
-
By limiting what we choose to control and interact with, we define our role as performers. It is my
belief that performance, sound production and artistic vision is defined by the choices we make.
How we decide to use our tools dictates how we choose to focus our attention.
Well start our discussion by defining two different types of control.
Automatic Control
Automatic, instant or control surface mapping enables hardware to intuitively map to software
parameters. This facilitates encoders, buttons and sliders to serve multiple functions by
automatically reassigning them depending on the device or parameter in focus.
In the figure below, the blue hand icon located on the device title bar indicates that a hardware
controller is automatically mapped to control this particular device. Subsequently, if a user clicks on
the title bar of another device, the hardware updates and the same encoders control parameters of
the newly chosen device.
Fixed Mapping
http://macprovid.vo.llnwd.net/o43/hub/media/1133/10204/01_Control_Surface_Mapping.pnghttp://macprovid.vo.llnwd.net/o43/hub/media/1133/10204/02_Device_Control.png
-
Manual mapping differs in that each MIDI assigned hardware component is fixed to a single (or set
of) user defined software parameters. This remains constant unless manually reassigned.
If using Ableton Live, this functionality can be activated by going to the MIDI Sync preferences
and enabling the Remote option.
To make manual assignments, activate the MIDI Map Mode Switch to toggle MIDI Map Mode.
Clicking on most any software parameter (colored blue) and sending a controller message from
your hardware assigns that note or controller value to a selected parameter.
Both Sides of the Coin
Instant mapping denotes the more current trend of automatic mapped control where a single
hardware component is not fixed to a particular parameter. This type of mapping allows the user to
control whichever instrument or device is selected or in focus. Whilst this flexibility is extremely
useful for studio production, it can be distracting at times for stage performance.
Automatic mapping gives the user the ability to control most anything in the session without
predetermined mapping. However, navigating the setup often requires banking through menus and
http://macprovid.vo.llnwd.net/o43/hub/media/1133/10204/03_Midi_Remote_Prefs.pnghttp://macprovid.vo.llnwd.net/o43/hub/media/1133/10204/04_Midi_Map_Mode.png
-
submenus to locate desired controls. If the hardware controller does not have a visual readout such
as a scribble strip, performers tend to be more inclined to rely on their computer screens.
Hard mapping, or one to one mapping is efficient because of its literalness; essentially what you
touch is what you get. The usefulness of this method is that it builds strong tactile relationships that
increase the familiarity and playability of the setup.
This process is much like learning a traditional instrument guitar, violin, piano, etc. Although the
tuning may change, more often the strings, keys or basic build of the instruments do not. Skilled
traditional instrumentalists rely on repetition and muscle memory to gain proficiency. Many of them
do not need to look at their instruments to know where a particular note is.
Bridging the Gap
In my own practice, I have tried to amalgamate these two methods by implementing a combination
of both manual and automatic mapping. The challenge is finding a balance between the two and
understanding where you need flexibility and where you dont.
The following are some considerations and guidelines:
Where do I need flexibility?
Which parameters do I use most?
How does the design of my setup aid or interfere with how I manage time and
attention during my performance?
Recognize there are physical limitations of a single performer to manage the
multitude of tasks required to control every single aspect of computer instrumentation
on the fly.
Maximum flexibility to change any thing at any point is not always the best practice.
Balancing Act in Action
Although each performers approach will differ based on their own needs, below is a basic example
of how one might implement both systems into a setup.
Automatic Mapping to:
Launch clips and scenes
-
Navigate tracks
Operate Mixer Controls
Manual Mapping to:
Control predetermined track and master effects
Play virtual instruments.
Separate hardware controllers for each dedicated type of instrument.
Trigger Pads - Drums
Keyboard - Synth
Hardware Controller Layout:
PUSH, APC or Launchpad to control automatic mapping functions
nanoKONTROL for manipulating manually mapped effect parameters
QuNeo for playing drum racks
Novation Launchkey for playing pitched synth instruments
Although this example requires several pieces of equipment, it denotes how a setup might benefit
by dividing each hardware device to a dedicated function or set of functions. With practice, a
performer can reach for the same hardware controls time and time again and achieve the same
results without needing to navigate menus and sub-menus.
This type of approach reinforces muscle memory which in turn leads to more fluid tactile control. It
builds confidence, keeps performers from second guessing which device they are controlling and
works wonders for those wanting to be less dependent on the computer screen.
User Mode
Although it may be preferable to have separate dedicated hardware units for different functions, it
might not always be feasible, convenient or affordable. As an alternative, you can still map out a
single controller in much the same fashion.
PUSH for example has a User Mode. With the press of a button you enter an alternate world. Each
of the controls in this mode allow for a separate layer of manual MIDI mapping. Press User Mode
again and youre back to automap territory.
-
On the AKAI APC Series, a performer can override pre-mapped functions of all hardware controls.
As previously described, simply switch on remote control functionality under the MIDI Sync
preference and start MIDI Mapping. A user can easily override manual mapping by deactivating the
remote switch in the MIDI Sync preferences. Reenable it by switching it on again.
Limitations to Remove Limitations
Manual mapping limits the amount of parameters a performer can control at any given time. We
often view limitation as an undesirable quality. However, without clearly delineated boundaries, it
is easy to lose focus and be distracted by too many options.
http://macprovid.vo.llnwd.net/o43/hub/media/1133/10204/05_User_Mode.png
-
Robert Henke (aka Monolake), one of the founding developers of Ableton Live, corroborates in an
interview at MUTEK 2014.
Limitations are really powerfulLimitations help me to rethink my priorities It helps
inspiration if you have guidelines The biggest decision is what not to use. (Interview with
Robert Henke about Lumire | Ableton 2014 @ 00:07:45)