musical issues in copyright ??morrison leahy music v lightbond [1993] emlr 144 ... torn (natalie...
Post on 17-Apr-2018
358 views
Embed Size (px)
TRANSCRIPT
MUSICAL ISSUES IN COPYRIGHT LAWKevin Glover, Shortland Chambers
Musical worksMusical works
What is a musical work? Section 2, Copyright Act 1994: Musical work means a work consisting of music,
exclusive of any words intended to be sung or spoken with the music or any actions intended to be performed with the music.
John Cage
Musical worksMusical works
Note different works within a song Potentially:Music Lyrics as literary work Performers rights Album artwork
Peter Hayes v Phonogram Limited [2003] ECDR 11
Arrangements as musical worksArrangements as musical works
ZYX Music v King (20 Feb 1997, EWCA) Please dont go KC and the Sunshine Band, Double You (Italy) and KWS
(UK) Sought licence, refused Injunction in Germany (Cologne) Injunction in Germany (Cologne) Arrangement protected
OwnershipOwnership
Hadley v Kemp (1999) 4 EMLR 589 (Spandau Ballet) Kemp wrote all music Voluntary paymentsy p y Joint authorship?
Fisher v Brooker [2009] UKHL 41 (Procol Harum) Fisher v Brooker [2009] UKHL 41 (Procol Harum) Organ part as 40%
OwnershipOwnership
Commonly dealt with by contract Procol Harum Pink Floyd The Smiths Joyce v Morrissey (1998, EWCA)y y ( 99 , ) Performance-related rights vs songwriting
The Wiggles The Wiggles
Moral rightsMoral rights
Morrison Leahy Music v Lightbond [1993] EMLR 144 Wham! megamix
Confetti Records v Warner Music [2003] EWHC 1274 (Ch)1274 (Ch) Burnin Antill Mob The Heartless Crew The Heartless Crew
Infringement inspirationInfringement inspiration
Johann Pachelbels Canon "Let it be" (The Beatles) "Ladies and gentlemen we are floating in space"
(Spiritualized) "No woman, no cry" (Bob Marley) "All together now" (The Farm) All together now (The Farm) "Streets of London" (Roger Whittaker) "Basket case" (Green Day ) Basket case (Green Day ) "I'll C U when U get there" (Coolio)
Infringement inspirationInfringement inspiration
Johann Pachelbels Canon (continued) "Domain" (Future Sound of London) "I should be so lucky" (Kylie Minogue) "Torn" (Natalie Imbruglia)(N g ) "Tunnel of love" (Dire Straits) "We're not gonna take it" (Twisted Sister) We re not gonna take it (Twisted Sister) "With or without you" (U2)
Infringement inspirationInfringement inspiration
Procol Harum / JS Bach Lyricsy
Willie Dixon Led Zeppelin Led Zeppelin
Ludlow Music v Robbie Williams [2001] FSR 19W d G h i Woody Guthrie
Parodied by Loudon Wainwright III, assigned copyright Robbie Williams
InfringementInfringement
Deliberate copying of a substantial part Sampling 1980s/early 1990s The Rolling Stones / The Verve The Clash / Norman Cook/ N Shona Laing & The Crocodiles / Headless Chickens Rick James / MC Hammer Rick James / MC Hammer
InfringementInfringement
Meaning of substantial part Quality, not just quantity Can be small low threshold? Hawkes & Son v Paramount Film Service (UK CA, 1934)( , 9 )
Infringement inspirationInfringement inspiration
EMI Songs Australia v Larrikin Music Publishing [2011] FCAFC 47 Kookaburra Down under
InfringementInfringement
Subconscious (inferred?) copying Cryptomnesia Not found in Francis Day & Hunter v Bron [1963] 1 Ch
587 (EWCA) Bright Tunes Music Carp v Harrisongs Music Ltd (1976) Radiohead / The Hollies Radiohead / The Hollies
InfringementInfringement
Mash-ups E.g. Paperback believer Danger Mouse The Grey Album
Fair useFair use
Parody as a defence?
ConclusionConclusion
Low levels of formality in ownership arrangements in bands
Musicians may rely upon managers, producers and lawyersy
Easy to allege plagiarism and difficult to defend if there is some similaritythere is some similarity
Several different rights in play