myghg mitigation reporting template ver. 03 march · pdf filemyghg mitigation reporting...

MYGHG Mitigation Reporting Template Ver. 03 March 2015

(This GHG mitigation reporting template is to be cross-referred with the latest Measurement and Reporting (MR) Guidance document for full description of the required information) A. Policy level GHG Mitigation-MR SUMMARY

A.1 Summary

Title: (Name of the national mitigation strategy)

Sustainability Achieved via Energy Efficiency (SAVE) Rebate Programme for Chiller

Level of assessment

Programme level

Main policy or actions in assessment

NKEA ETP EPP9 – Oil Gas & Energy

Type of Policy/Action

Subsidies and incentives

Status of the strategy

Implemented

Date of implementation (the date the mitigation strategy comes into effect)

7 July, 2011

Date of Completion (if applicable)

31 December, 2016

Description of specific intervention(s)

Click here to enter text.

Other related policy/actions (Other policy that may interact with the abovementioned main policy)

Minimum Energy Performance Standard (MEPS)

Targeted sector(s) (single or multiple choices, if applicable)

☐Energy ☐Forestry

☐Industrial Processes and Product Use ☐Agriculture

☒Buildings ☐Waste

☐Transport ☐Other (Click here to enter text.)

Category of mitigation action MRV

Domestic

Geographical Coverage

National

Estimated GHG Emission Reductions

Click here to enter text. (MtCO2 / year)

Brief description of GHG mitigation programme and the proposed activities

The SAVE Programme was targeted at stimulating sales of energy efficient chillers by providing rebates to qualified business owner to replace existing chillers installed before on or in 2002

(Provide brief account of target policy, measures, relevant Ministries & Government Departments, MRV activities (project features – technology, capacity building measures- workshops, financing – model etc.,)

with new energy efficient chillers with a rebate amount of RM200 per Refrigeration Ton. The increase in efficiency of the chillers is to be measured as kW/RT and must meet the Malaysian Standard MS 1525:2007 (Code of Practice on Energy Efficiency and use of Renewable Energy for Non-Residential Buildings). GHG reduction is expected to come from: i) More energy efficient chillers complying to kW/RT ii) Refrigerants that have similar or lower GWPs compared to the replaced chiller, excluding the banned refrigerants.

B. MRV PROPONENT(S)

B.1 Information of MRV Proponents (Provide details of each MRV proponent separately by copying this Section B.)

MRV’s Coordinating and Managing Entity

SEDA Malaysia

Major Responsibilities

Energy Efficiency project - Managing and implementing projects

mandated to SEDA

Domain activities, skills and expertise (e.g. major activity / business of agency / institution/organisation, and current skills and experience with specific reference to the proposed MRV, motivation / rationale for leading the MRV )

SEDA is responsible for processing applications for the SAVE programme, appoint authorized verifiers, the distribution of rebate and random monitoring of the recipients of the rebate and provide human capital development (training).

Contact person

Steve Lojutin

Details of contact Tel: 03-8870 5841 Fax: 03-8870 5900 Email: [email protected] / [email protected]

B.2 MRV Collaborator(s) (Provide details of the agencies / institutions collaborating with MRV proponent(s) in MRV design, development, implementation and financing (domestic institutions or international Donor) Provider of energy efficient chillers: Participating manufacturers Verifying of energy efficient chillers: Appointed by KETTHA/SEDA, and assisted by SIRIM QAS, MASHRAE, ACEM and IEM (Technical Committee SAVE Chiller) Awareness and promotion: Coordinated and implemented by KeTTHA/SEDA and assisted by MASHRAE and manufacturers.

mailto:[email protected]

Refer to Table 1 in Annex IV for list of Chiller’s verifier.

Collaborator 1

Name of the Collaborator

Contact person


Details of contact Tel: Fax: Email:

Responsibilities


(Repeat this section for 2nd and each subsequent collaborator )

C. MRV DESCRIPTION

C.1 Policies and Regulations (Provide an overview of the prevailing policies and regulations in the sector chosen for the MRV)

C.1.1 Federal / State Policies

Name of the Policy & Year of introduction


Implementing department / agency


Policy brief


Current level of acceptance or compliance


Indicate source (web link) of policy document


C.1.2 Federal / State Regulations

Name of the Regulation & Year of introduction


Implementing department / agency


Regulation brief Click here to enter text.

Current level of acceptance or compliance


Indicate source (web link) of Regulation document


C.2 Current level of activities (Baseline) (Provide all relevant information and details of the on-going activities for establishing a credible baseline) Baseline data was provided by SEDA based on market share of RT (refrigerant tone).

C.2.1 Details of Sub-Sector assessed ( i.e. which contributes to GHG emissions and removals)

ENERGY

a) Fuel Combustion Activities: Energy

Industries b) Fugitive Emissions from Fuels: Choose

an item.

c) Carbon dioxide transport and storage: Choose an item.

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES AND PRODUCT USE

a) Mineral Industry: Choose an item. b) Chemical Industry: Choose an item.

c) Metal Industry: Choose an item.

d) Non-energy products from fuels and solvents use: Choose an item.

e) Electronics Industry: Choose an item.

f) Product uses as substitutes for ozone depleting substances: Refrigeration and air conditioning

g) Other product manufacture and use: Choose an item.

h) Other: Choose an item.

AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND OTHER LAND USE

a) Livestock: Choose an item. b) Land: Choose an item.

c) Aggregated Sources and Non-CO2 emissions sources on Land: Choose an item.

d) Other: Choose an item.

WASTE

☐Solid waste disposal ☐Biological treatment of solid waste

☐Incineration and open burning of waste ☐Wastewater treatment and discharge

☐Other (Pls specify)

OTHER

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

2011 2012 2013

RT

Year

RT Actual vs Target

Actual Target

☐Indirect N2O emissions from the atmospheric deposition of nitrogen in NOx and NH3

C.2.2 GHG Assessment (Provide the geographical coverage of MRV)

National

(Provide GHG assessment period)

YYYY to YYYY

C.2.3 GHG Emissions & Sources (Identify the major sources of GHG emissions/sink and the GHG targeted to be included in the MRV)

a) Source category, GHG targeted

☒Stationary fossil fuel combustion, CO2,CH4, N2O

☐Mobile fossil fuel combustion, CO2,CH4, N2O

☐Cement manufacture, CO2 ☐Aluminium production, CO2, PFCs

☐Natural gas system, CO2,CH4 ☐Landfills, CH4

☐Electrical transmission and distribution, SF6 ☐Refrigeration and air conditioning equipment, HFCs

☐Agricultural soil management, CO2, N2O ☐Forest and other land use, CO2,CH4, N2O

b) Sink category, GHG targeted

☐Biological processes, CO2 ☐Carbon capture and storage, CO2

Target Beneficiaries

List the target beneficiaries e.g. manufacturers, consumers – domestic or industrial or commercial, project developers Chiller manufacturer. Owners of buildings that utilise chillers for comfort cooling.

Provide quantitative assessment of the size of the beneficiaries under the MRV There are 180 chillers in Malaysia, estimated based on 2013 Annual Report of SEDA where 89,454 chillers represent about 46% of the chillers in the market.

Inclusion Criteria

List the criteria likely to be followed for including any beneficiary situated in the MRV boundary to join NAMA e.g. size of the activity (MWe o MWth), current efficiency levels, technology etc., Chillers for comfort cooling or commercial building at operation or non-operational condition installed before or in the year 2002 for Peninsular Malaysia. Chillers for cooling or chilling for process activities and buildings installed before or in the year 2002 in East Malaysia (more than 10 years).

Only water-cooled electric chillers are can apply for rebates. Replacement chillers must comply with the minimum kW/RT rating stipulated in MS1525:2007.

C.3 Baseline activity and emissions

Provide a brief of business as usual scenario of the sector / sub-sector and latest emissions data set with sources Historical data not available.

Emissions Data Set

Provide the latest emissions data set for the sector / sub-sector and cite sources. Indicate any limitation on the extent of availability of data

GHG Emission factor for electricity generation: 0.792 kg CO2e/KWh (MYLCID) Emission data of refrigerants in terms of % of initial charge/year (IPCC)

GWP of refrigerants (IPCC)

Emissions Archive (Historical)

Provide details of the past emissions and trend for the sector / sub-sector under the MRV

Chillers have cross-sector applications. The SAVE Programme for chillers however targets at chillers that are part of the HVAC system, and of capacity relevant to the non-residential buildings. In principle, emissions prior to introducing the SAVE programme would have been 66,607 ton CO2, avoided through replacement with energy efficient chillers since July 2011 to Dec 2013.

Agents and projections

Provide a brief analysis of the agents that are influencing the emission developments

Other than Environmental Quality (Refrigerant Management) Regulations 1999 that bans all CFCs, the use of all other refrigerants are not regulated, including those with high GWPs. Energy efficient chillers meeting the MS1525 standard may be using refrigerants of higher GWP as compared to the older chiller being replaced. Hence it is important that considerations should also be given to refrigerants used for programmes that are targeting at GHG emission reductions from chillers. References of 100-year time horizon GWP (Global Warming Potential): Table 2.14 of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Fourth Assessment Report, 2007.

BAU scenario

List the major assumptions and the future outlook (projections) of GHG emission levels / development pattern in the sector / sub-sector under the MRV in the BAU scenario Continued use of low energy efficiency chillers with possible leakage of refrigerants of high GWP during operation in HVAC systems of commercial buildings, and also industrial processes in East Malaysia. The higher consumption of electricity means higher GHG emission from the power plants

Provide an outline of influence of any Federal or Provincial policy or regulations on the above emission projections Chillers are not included in the Minimum Energy Performance (MEP) equipment list regulated by Energy Commission.

C.4 Barriers

Provide a brief description of the barriers faced by the sector / sub-sector to achieve any or additional GHG emission reductions in the absence of policy instruments;

Barriers

Provide a brief summary of the barriers faced by the sector / sub-sector for achieving GHG emission reductions. Typical barriers relate to technology, investment, economic viability, lack of knowledge / skills/ training / experience, regulatory, historical failures. The guidance for various barriers can be referred from CDM (http://cdm.unfccc.int/)

Describe how the proposed activities under the mitigation action will overcome the barriers for the sector / sub-sector.

C.5 Proposed activities

List the activities and expected outcomes with a tentative time-schedule under the mitigation actions.

Proposed Activities

Boundary and Expected Outcomes

Implementation Schedule

SAVE Program: Rebate chiller (RM200/tone) for retrofit inefficient chillers for comfort cooling.

Date of Start 2011

Date of Completion 2013

(a) Submit information on existing chillers for verification and approval of SEDA

Old chillers that will be replaced

(b) Purchase and install new chillers within 6 months of approval from SEDA and get ready information for site verfication

Old chillers replaced, with potential release of refrigerants during recovery and disposal phase New chillers installed with reduced energy consumption and reduced GHG emission

(c) Monitor performance and GHG reduction of new chillers over stipulated period

GHG reduction measured based on site-measurements of electricity consumed during operation of new chillers

(Add rows as required)

C.6 Estimation of annual GHG emission reductions

Provide an approximate estimate of annual GHG emission reductions anticipated to be achieved from all the proposed activities on a cumulative basis.

The estimation methodology will be adapted from CDM EB56 III.X Energy Efficiency and HFC-134a Recovery in Residential Refrigerators, and EB34 Paragraph 17 Type of GHGs to be Considered in Accounting for Project and Leakage Emissions. Emission reductions are based on:

Electricity consumed (ex-ante) to operate the new chiller for the one year

% of total refrigerant from the new chiller that would be released over one year after replacement

Annual GHG emission reductions

Year Emission reductions (tCO2e) – Based on Energy Efficiency

2011 49964.6

2012 81190.6

2013 113667

Total 244822

Refer to Table 1 in Annex II.

C.7 Overall benefits

Describe the overall expected benefits (both quantitative and qualitative) for the stakeholders from the implementation of the proposed activities under the MRV in the targeted sector / sub-sector. The SAVE Programme for chillers is one of the initiatives to mitigate GHG emissions reduction.

Save energy costs of the chiller owner from reduced energy consumption

Environmental

Reduction in GHG emissions, use of low GWP refrigerants.

Economic (optional)

Cost reduction in term of electricity bill

Societal (optional)

Cooler environment

Others (optional)

List other major benefits proposed to be achieved in the mitigation action

(e.g. technology, transfer of IPR, skills, replication potential to scale the GHG mitigation, uptake potential of the national policy / regulation on low carbon due to mitigation action etc.,)

C.8 Measuring, Reporting & Verification

Provide a brief summary of MRV concept and approach for the proposed activities under the mitigation actions/strategies. (Create hyperlink to the completed MR plan excel sheet) The monitoring activities address both the energy efficiency aspect of the newly chiller and the refrigerant contribution to GHG reduction.

Measuring

Provide a description of the monitoring methodology and list key monitoring parameters as applicable for the Sector and its applicability for the sub-sector The SAVE Programme require the applicant to install a permanent sub-metering (power meter) to measure and monitor the kW/RT of the new chiller(s).

Provide a brief summary of monitoring infrastructure and competency available / proposed to be deployed

Data recorder is installed together with the sub-metering (power meter) or applicant is expected to keep a log book of the readings from the power meter at frequencies stipulated in the official approval letter from SEDA.

Reporting

Provide a brief summary of modus operandi on reporting along with the roles and responsibilities of the team

Random reporting as required by SEDA Malaysia in the official approval letter

Verification (optional)

Summarise the proposed type of verification, approach, frequency, standards and engagement of third party including whether it is mandated by donor or as per host country requirements N/A

Indicate the extent of anticipated overlapping with other programme like CDM, voluntary projects and also procedures to avoid double counting of GHG emission reductions

D. OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION AND ANNEX

D.1 Other information

Provide details of any other information relevant to the mitigation action implementation

Implementation Guidelines Version 3

Sustainability Achieved Via Energy Efficiency (SAVE) Rebate Program for Chiller. KeTTHA and SEDA

D.2 Annex information

List the title of the Annex here

Annex I

Tables

Tabulation for identification of Sources and Sinks

Annex II

Figure 1 Identification of sources of GHG

emission from mapping the input, activities, intermediate effects and the corresponding GHG effects in the SAVE Rebate Programme for Chiller

Annex III

Table 1 Calculation of Baseline and Potential

GHG Emission Reduction by Energy Efficiency

Annex IV

Table 1 List of Chiller Verifiers

Annex V List of Global Warming Potentials (GWP) relative to CO2

Annex I

Tabulation for identification of Sources and Sinks

Summary of inputs, activities and effects

Inputs Financing, old chillers, new chillers that are energy efficient, associated equipment with the chiller, authorised verifier, testing facilities, site measurement equipment (sub-metering or power meter)

Activities Procurement of energy efficient chillers and associated equipment, Site verification, provision of rebates, monitoring, measurement and monitor the indicator (kW/RT) using power meters, disposal of old chillers

Intermediate effects

Stimulate purchase of energy efficient chillers, stimulate production of refrigerants with lower GWP, stimulate production of associated equipment such as pumps, cooling towers, valves that will enhance the performance of the chillers, old chillers and associated equipment contribute to recycling industry as feedstock, reduce in electricity consumption, reduce production, leakage and disposal of high GWP refrigerants

GHG effects Reduce CO2, CH4 and N2O from reduced electricity consumption, reduced refrigerant with high GWO, leading to reduced CO2eq emission from possible fugitive emission of refrigerants with lower GWP

Non-ghg effects

Enhance resource recovery industry with availability of old chillers parts made of copper and iron.

Identification of Intermediate Effects

Intended effect Electricity consumption by chillers is reduced Consumption of high GWP refrigerants is reduced

Unintended effect

Availability of chillers that are energy efficient based on the indicator (kW/RT) but uses high GWP refrigerants with potential leakage and fugitive emission, resulting in higher GHG emission from the equivalent ghg of the replaced old chillers

In-jurisdiction effect

Local chiller manufacturers produce energy efficient chillers, importers will bring in energy efficient chillers Availability of replaced chillers as feedstock for recycling industry such as copper parts, and iron parts for the steel-making industry

Out-of-jurisdiction effect

Functional old chillers that are replaced may be sold in other ASEAN markets as recond-chillers, thus increasing ghg emissions in other countries

Technology effect

Technological development to increase kW/RT

Identify sources/ sink categories and ghg associated with the ghg effects - GHG assessment

boundary

Potential GHG effects

Source/sink categories

GHG targeted

GHG effect

Justification

Emissions from electricity generation

Stationary fossil combustion in grid-connected power

plants

CO2, CH4, N2O

Reduced emission

Significant from purchasing more energy

efficient chillers

Emission from leakage of

refrigerants during deinstallation and disposal/recovery

Release of refrigerants

CFCs Increase emission

Leakage may not have happened if no

replacement was done

Emission from recovery/ disposal

of refrigerant

Release of refrigerants

CFCs Increase emission

Release may not have happened if no

replacement was done

Figure 1 : Identification of sources of GHG emission from mapping the input, activities, intermediate

effects and the corresponding GHG effects in the SAVE Rebate Programme for Chiller.

Annex II

Table 1: Calculation of Baseline and Potential GHG Emission Reduction by Energy Efficiency

Item Old Chiller New Chiller

Type of chiller Water-cooled centrifugal chillers Water-cooled centrifugal chillers

Brands Mitsubishi York Trane

Cooling capacity 1000 tone 1000 tone

Power capacity 680 kW 592 kW

Efficiency level 0.68 kW/RT 0.59 kW/RT

Daily energy usage (Operation period = 24 hr./daily)

Estimated energy usage

annually

24 hr. x 0.68 kW/tone x 1000 tone x

364 days = 5,940,480 kWh

24 hr. x 0.59 kW/tone x 1000 tone

x 364 days = 5,154,240 kWh

GHG emission/ year 5,940,480 kWh x 0.792 kg CO2e/kWh

= 4,704,860 kgCO2e

5,154,240 kWh x 0.792 kg

CO2eq/kWh = 4,082,158 kgCO2e

GHG emission reduction

through energy efficiency

622,702 kgCO2e/year

623 toneCO2e/year

Table 2: Example Calculation of Baseline and Potential GHG Emission Reduction via Refrigerant of Lower

GWP Based on Type of Refrigerant.

Item Old Chiller New Chiller

Type of chiller Water-cooled centrifugal chillers Water-cooled centrifugal chillers

Brands Mitsubishi York Trane

Cooling capacity 1000 tone 1000 tone

Power capacity 680 kW 592 kW

Refrigerant R-11 R-123

Amount charge at

installation

Leakage at dis-installation

*Leakage during operation % of lose refrigerant = 8.5%/year

Leaking = 8.5/100 x 1000 tone

= 85 tone R-11/year

% of lose refrigerant = 0.1%/year

Leaking = 0.1/100 x 1000 tone

= 0.1 tone R-

123/year

Leakage at recovery (for

disposal)

**GWP *4,750 *77

GHG emission/year 85 tone R-11 x 4750 GWP

= 403750 toneCO2e/year

0.1 tone R-123 x 77 GWP

= 7.7 toneCO2e/year

GHG emission reduction

through energy efficiency

403742.3 toneCO2e/year

Note * - Older chillers can lose refrigerant at 2-15 percent annually. Newer chillers equipped with

specially design pressure vessels and high-performance seals can cut the loss rate to 0.1 percent per

year. Chillers Performance: (Source: http://www.facilitiesnet.com. Challenge and Solutions – Facility

Management Energy Efficiency Feature )

Note ** - GWP for 100-year time horizon. 4th assessment report (AR4).

Annex IV

http://www.facilitiesnet.com/

Table 1: List of Chiller Verifiers

1st Verifiers Name

1 IR LEONG SAIK KONG (SELANGOR)

2 IR PHANG CHEN FAUT (K.LUMPUR)

3 IR WONG YEE FOONG (JOHOR)

4 IR ARUL HISHAM BIN ABDUL RAHIM (SELANGOR)

5 IR WONG KIAT CHOONG (SELANGOR)

6 IR TAN BAK PING (PENANG)

7 MR TAN WEE HAN (SELANGOR)

8 IR LEE KHEK MUI (PENANG)

9 IR LYE KAH HSIUNG (SELANGOR)

10 IR CHAN WENG LOON (SELANGOR)

11 IR ROSHAN THAMARAKSHAN (PENANG)

12 IR TEH CHIN FOO (PENANG)

13 MR WU CHING LEE (SELANGOR)

14 IR. LIM KEK SIA (SELANGOR)

15 MR. VEKNESWARAN ARASAPPAN (K.LUMPUR)

16 IR. TAN WEE KEONG (SELANGOR)

17 IR. MOHAMAD ZAINAL ABIDIN BIN IBRAHIM (TERENGGANU)

18 IR. DR. CHOK LIAN FATT (KEDAH)

19 IR. KUMARASON S. KANDIAH (SELANGOR)

20 MR. LIM CHEAN EE (SELANGOR)

21 MS. LEE AILEEN (SELANGOR)

22 MR. WONG FOOK KEE (SELANGOR)

23 IR. KONG KOK HAW (SELANGOR)

24 IR. POH CHOU CHUEN (K.LUMPUR)

25 IR. MUI HENG CHOR (K.LUMPUR)

26 IR. CHONG VUI HEN @ JOHN (SABAH)

27 MR. RIZA ABDILLAH KAMARUZZAMAN (SELANGOR)

28 IR. BERNAD SAGAIYARAJ (SELANGOR)

29 IR. NG. CHEE SING (SELANGOR)

2nd Verifiers Name

1 IR. KASIM AHMAD (SIRIM BERHAD)

2 EN. MOHAMAD BIN ZAKARIA (CAWANGAN PENANG)

3 CIK NORZAILA NOORDIN, (CAWANGAN MELAKA)

4 EN. KASVENDA KASIM (CAWANGAN SARAWAK)

5 EN. MOHD SOLEHAM JURAIMI KAMARUDIN (CAWANGAN TERENGGANU)

6 EN. AHMAD MIZAN MD. YUSOF, PENSIJILAN BARANGAN (SEKTOR

PEMERIKSAAN)

7 EN. NORAZLAN SHAH NORDIN, PENSIJILAN BARANGAN (SEKTOR

PEMERIKSAAN)

8 PN. NORIZA MOHAMED SUFIAN, PENSIJILAN BARANGAN (SEKTOR

PEMERIKSAAN)

9 PN. NORSHUHADA KAMARUDIN, PENSIJILAN BARANGAN (SEKTOR

PEMERIKSAAN)

10 EN. HARMAN ALANG KASIM, PENSIJILAN BARANGAN (SEKTOR PEMERIKSAAN)

11 MR. MUHAMMAD NAZIF ZAKARIA

12 MR. MOHD HAMIZI MOHD SAMSI

Annex V

myghg mitigation reporting template ver. 03 march · pdf filemyghg mitigation reporting...

Documents