nacada team process 2012 (steve)

11
DECISION DOCUMENT • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • SCOPE AND REQUIREMENTS • OPTIONS CONSIDERED • COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS • RESOURCE IMPACT GENERAL FORMAT

Upload: laura-a-pasquini-phd

Post on 19-May-2015

234 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Nacada team process 2012 (steve)

DECISION DOCUMENT

• EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• SCOPE AND REQUIREMENTS• OPTIONS CONSIDERED• COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS• RESOURCE IMPACT

GENERAL FORMAT

Page 2: Nacada team process 2012 (steve)

DECISION DOCUMENT

ONE PAGE SUMMARY• Brief High Level Narrative• Vendor Ranking Table• Three Year Cost Projection• Recommended Solution

APPROVALS PAGE• Decision Makers/Funding People• Key Implementers

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Page 3: Nacada team process 2012 (steve)

DECISION DOCUMENT

SCOPE AND REQUIREMENTS

• PROJECT SCOPE

- Defines Boundaries

• GENERAL HIGH LEVEL REQUIREMENTS

- General Definitions

Page 4: Nacada team process 2012 (steve)

DECISION DOCUMENT

OPTIONS CONSIDERED

• VENDOR CRITERIA

• REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTIONS

• WEIGHTED REQUIREMENT SCHEME

• VENDOR RANKING

• VENDOR RECOMMENDATION

Page 5: Nacada team process 2012 (steve)

DECISION DOCUMENT

VENDOR CRITERIA

• MUST HAVE REQUIREMENTS

• GO OR NO-GO VENDOR CUTOFF

Page 6: Nacada team process 2012 (steve)

DECISION DOCUMENT

REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTIONS

• MUST HAVE REQUIREMENTS– Detailed for Evaluation Scores

• MAY INCLUDE NICE-TO-HAVE OPTIONS

Page 7: Nacada team process 2012 (steve)

DECISION DOCUMENT

WEIGHTED REQUIREMENTS SCHEME

• RANK MUST HAVE/DETAILED RQMTS- Assign numerical weights

• RANK NICE-TO-HAVE OPTIONS

- Assign numerical weights

Page 8: Nacada team process 2012 (steve)

DECISION DOCUMENT

VENDOR RANKING/RECOMMENDATION

• MUST HAVE/DETAILED RQMTS TABLE

- Total by Must Have Rqmts

• MUST HAVE RQMTS SUMMARY TABLE

• RECOMMENDATION

Page 9: Nacada team process 2012 (steve)

DECISION DOCUMENT

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS

• VENDOR COST COMPARISONS

• THREE YEAR COST PROJECTION

– Return On Investment (ROI)

• COST BENEFITS SUMMARY

Page 10: Nacada team process 2012 (steve)

DECISION DOCUMENT

RESOURCE IMPACT

• PERSONNEL RESOURCES

• COMPUTER RESOURCES

• IMPLEMENTATION PLAN– RECOMMENDED TEAM– SCHEDULE OF EVENTS – POTENTIAL CONFLICTS

Page 11: Nacada team process 2012 (steve)

DECISION DOCUMENT

• HIGHLY EFFECTIVE PROCESS- General to Specific

• FACILITATES AGREEMENT- All Organizations Including IT

• DOCUMENTS DIRECTION- Excellent Communication Tool

RESULTS USING THIS METHOD