nacada team process 2012 (steve)
TRANSCRIPT
DECISION DOCUMENT
• EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• SCOPE AND REQUIREMENTS• OPTIONS CONSIDERED• COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS• RESOURCE IMPACT
GENERAL FORMAT
DECISION DOCUMENT
ONE PAGE SUMMARY• Brief High Level Narrative• Vendor Ranking Table• Three Year Cost Projection• Recommended Solution
APPROVALS PAGE• Decision Makers/Funding People• Key Implementers
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DECISION DOCUMENT
SCOPE AND REQUIREMENTS
• PROJECT SCOPE
- Defines Boundaries
• GENERAL HIGH LEVEL REQUIREMENTS
- General Definitions
DECISION DOCUMENT
OPTIONS CONSIDERED
• VENDOR CRITERIA
• REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTIONS
• WEIGHTED REQUIREMENT SCHEME
• VENDOR RANKING
• VENDOR RECOMMENDATION
DECISION DOCUMENT
VENDOR CRITERIA
• MUST HAVE REQUIREMENTS
• GO OR NO-GO VENDOR CUTOFF
DECISION DOCUMENT
REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTIONS
• MUST HAVE REQUIREMENTS– Detailed for Evaluation Scores
• MAY INCLUDE NICE-TO-HAVE OPTIONS
DECISION DOCUMENT
WEIGHTED REQUIREMENTS SCHEME
• RANK MUST HAVE/DETAILED RQMTS- Assign numerical weights
• RANK NICE-TO-HAVE OPTIONS
- Assign numerical weights
DECISION DOCUMENT
VENDOR RANKING/RECOMMENDATION
• MUST HAVE/DETAILED RQMTS TABLE
- Total by Must Have Rqmts
• MUST HAVE RQMTS SUMMARY TABLE
• RECOMMENDATION
DECISION DOCUMENT
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
• VENDOR COST COMPARISONS
• THREE YEAR COST PROJECTION
– Return On Investment (ROI)
• COST BENEFITS SUMMARY
DECISION DOCUMENT
RESOURCE IMPACT
• PERSONNEL RESOURCES
• COMPUTER RESOURCES
• IMPLEMENTATION PLAN– RECOMMENDED TEAM– SCHEDULE OF EVENTS – POTENTIAL CONFLICTS
DECISION DOCUMENT
• HIGHLY EFFECTIVE PROCESS- General to Specific
• FACILITATES AGREEMENT- All Organizations Including IT
• DOCUMENTS DIRECTION- Excellent Communication Tool
RESULTS USING THIS METHOD