nanocomposite membranes

Upload: sss

Post on 04-Apr-2018

237 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    1/28

    Enhanced Desalination System

    Performance Using SeawaterNanocomposite Membranes

    Robert Burk

    NanoH2O, Inc.

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    2/28

    Thin-Film Nanocomposite Membrane Technology

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    3/28

    Nanocomposite Membrane Development

    *

    * Image courtesy ProfessorEric Hoek, UCLA

    Coupon tests: 55

    bar (800 psi),

    32,000 ppm NaCl

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    4/28

    Product Specifications Qfx SW 400 ES Qfx SW 400 R Qfx SW 400 SR

    Permeate Flow Rate, m3

    /d (gpd) 52 (13,750) 34 (9,000) 24.6 (6,500)

    Minimum NaCl Rejection, % 99.7 99.75 99.75

    Stabilized NaCl Rejection, % 99.8 99.85 99.85

    Active Membrane Area, m2 (ft2) 37 (400) 37 (400) 37 (400)

    Feed Spacer, mil 28 28 28

    Stabilized Boron Rejection: % 89 93 93

    Dimensions

    Length (A)1016 mm

    (40 in.)

    Element O.D. (B)200 mm

    (7.9 in.)

    Per Tube I.D. (C)28.6 mm

    (1.125 in.)

    Weight16.4 kg

    (36 lbs.)

    Available Nanocomposite Membranes Qfx ES, R, SR

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    5/28

    Independent Validation

    Tianjin Institute for Seawater Desalination

    Element Test Results

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    6/28

    Independent Validation

    Source: KWR, Watercycle Research Inst.; MDIWCharacterization and comparison of

    SWRO for desalination: TFN vs. TFC. Bas Hofs

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    7/28

    Permeability vs. Standard TFC Membrane

    Source: KWR, Watercycle Research Inst.; MDIWCharacterization and comparison of

    SWRO for desalination: TFN vs. TFC. Bas Hofs

    TFN = NanoH2O Qfx SW 75 ES

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    8/28

    Rejection vs. Standard TFC Membrane

    Source: KWR, Watercycle Research Inst.; MDIWCharacterization and comparison of

    SWRO for desalination: TFN vs. TFC. Bas Hofs

    TFN = NanoH2O Qfx SW 75 ES

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    9/28

    Performance values for all but two cleaners (L212 and P911) fell into the normal ranges

    established for the control samples . . . the membrane samples soaked in L212 and P911actually improved.

    -Avista Technologies Report October 2010

    Conclusion: QuantumFlux ES membranes can withstand the same chemicalcleaning procedures as competing membranes.

    Chemical Resistance

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    10/28

    Pilot Installation - Port Hueneme, California

    NanoH2O pilot systeminstalled in 2008 at

    U.S. Navy Desalination

    Testing Facility

    Utilizing Qfx ES

    membrane elements

    34,000 ppm; 15 - 19C

    11 m3/h feed flow

    PX30 energy recovery

    device

    Submerged UF (GE

    Zenon) pretreatment

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    11/28

    Performance vs. Industry Standards

    11

    RO Module Efficacy

    US Navy Seawater

    Desalination Testing Facility

    Port Hueneme, CA

    (34,000 ppm, 15C)

    Salt Rejection

    (%)

    99.8 99.899.8

    46.7 m3/d

    (12,500 gpd) *

    34 m2

    (365 ft2)**

    22.7 m3/d

    6,000 gpd

    37.2 m2

    (400 ft2)

    34.1 m3/d

    (9,000 gpd)

    37.2 m2

    (400 ft2)

    Element Flux

    Active Area

    * 3000-hour Field Data

    ** Prototype now 400 ft2

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    12/28

    U.S. Navy Retrofit: 17% Less Energy

    12

    US Navy Desalination Facility

    Oxnard, CA (32,000 ppm, 15C)

    Significant Reduction in Operating Pressure

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    13/28

    U.S. Navy Retrofit: 25% More Water

    13

    US Navy Desalination Facility

    Oxnard, CA (32,000 ppm, 15C)

    Meaningful Increase in Plant Productivity

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    14/28

    Qfx SW ES Final U.S. Navy Test Facility

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    15/28

    Qfx SW ES Final U.S. Navy Test Facility

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    16/28

    Red Hook St. Thomas, USVI

    Installed in early 2011

    Utilizing Qfx ES

    membrane elements

    36,500 ppm; 29C

    Intake located in a boatharbor, one meter

    below the waters

    surface

    Excellent fouling

    resistance

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    17/28

    Red Hook St. Thomas, USVI

    System Permeate Flow

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    18/28

    Permeate Quality

    Red Hook St. Thomas, USVI

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    19/28

    More than One Year of Operating Data

    Water Authority Cayman,

    Brac Island SWRO Plant

    Installed July 1, 2011

    30 Qfx ES Modules

    30,620 ppm; 25 - 29C

    Replaced aging low flux TFC

    (6,000 gpd / 22.7 m3/d)

    elements

    Total energy reduction of

    28% by lowering high

    pressure pump feed

    pressure

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    20/28

    Lowered Energy from 3.47 kWh/m3 to 2.49 kWh/m3

    Cayman Brac Cayman Islands

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    21/28

    Cayman Brac Cayman Islands

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    22/28

    Cayman Brac Cayman Islands

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    23/28

    Cayman Brac Cayman Islands

    Lowered Specific Energy from

    3.47 kWh/m3 to 2.49 kWh/m3

    When compared to new membranes,

    savings are ~17%

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    24/28

    Pilot system installed in

    2011

    Utilizing Qfx R and SR

    50% increase in water

    production

    Improved permeatequality

    4% reduction in energy

    EMALSA - Canary Islands, Spain

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    25/28

    EMALSA - Canary Islands, Spain

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    26/28

    EMALSA - Canary Islands, Spain

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    27/28

    Summary Nanocomposite Membranes

    Early Research to Product with Demonstrated Performance

    Nanocomposite SWRO Membranes Highest Flux

    Qfx SW 400 ES: 13,700 GPD, 99.8%

    Nanocomposite SWRO Membranes Highest Rejection SWROMembranes on Market:

    Qfx SW 400 R: 9,000 GPD, 99.85% Qfx SW 400 SR: 6,500 GPD, 99.85%

    200,000+ Operating Hours / 60+ Installations / 75,000 m3/dCumulative Capacity

    Installations in 33 countries across 6 continents

    Just the Beginning!

  • 7/29/2019 Nanocomposite Membranes

    28/28

    Contact Information

    Thank You+1 424.218.4000

    www.nanoh2o.com

    Bob Burk

    [email protected]