nassp masters 5003f - computational astronomy - 2009 lecture 13 further with interferometry –...
TRANSCRIPT
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Lecture 13
Further with interferometry –
• Resolution and the field of view;
• Binning in frequency and time, and its effects on the image;
• Noise in cross-correlation;
• Gridding and its pros and cons.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Earth-rotation synthesis
Apply appropriate delays: like measuring Vwith ‘virtual antennas’ in a plane normalto the direction of the phase centre.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Earth-rotation synthesis
Apply appropriate delays: like measuring Vwith ‘virtual antennas’ in a plane normalto the direction of the phase centre.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Earth-rotation synthesis
Apply appropriate delays: like measuring V
with ‘virtual antennas’ in a plane normal
to the direction of the phase centre.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Field of view and resolution.
Single dish:FOV and resolution are the same.
FOV ~ λ/d(d = dish diameter)
Resolution ~ λ/d
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Field of view and resolution.
Aperture synthesis array:FOV is much larger than resolution.
FOV ~ λ/d Resolution ~ λ/D(D = longest baseline)
d
D
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Field of view and resolution.
Phased array:Signals delayed then added.FOV again = resolution.
FOV ~ λ/D Resolution ~ λ/Dd
D
Good for spectroscopy,VLBI.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
LOFAR – can see the whole sky at once.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Reconstructing the image.
• The basic relation of aperture synthesis:
where all the (l,m) functions have been bundled into I´. We can easily recover the true brightness distribution from this.
• The inverse relationship is:
• But, we have seen, we don’t know V everywhere.
vmulimlIdmdlvuV 2exp,,
vmulivuVdvdumlI 2exp,,
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Sampling function and dirty image• Instead, we have samples of V. Ie V is
multiplied by a sampling function S.
• Since the FT of a product is a convolution,
where the ‘dirty beam’ B is the FT of the sampling function:
ID is called the ‘dirty image’.
vmulivuSvuVdvdumlI 2D e,,,
mlBmlImlI ,,,D
vmulivuSdvdumlB 2e,,
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Painting in V as the Earth rotates
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Painting in V as the Earth rotates
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
But we must ‘bin up’ in ν and t.
This smears out the finer ripples.Fourier theory says: finer ripples come from distant sources.Therefore want small Δν, Δt for wide-field imaging. But: huge files.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
We further pretend that these samples are points.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
What’s the noise in these measurements?• Theory of noise in a cross-correlation is a little
involved... but if we assume the source flux S is weak compared to sky+system noise, then
• If antennas the same,
• Root 2 smaller SNR from single-dish of combined area (lecture 9).– Because autocorrelations not done information lost.
t
T
A
kS total
erms
2
t
TT
AA
kS total2total1
e2e1
rms
2
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Resulting noise in the image:
Spatially uniform – but not ‘white’.
(Note: noise in real and imaginaryparts of the visibility is uncorrelated.)
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Transforming to the image plane:
• Can calculate the FT directly, by summing sine and cosine terms.– Computationally expensive - particularly with
lots of samples.• MeerKAT: a day’s observing will generate about
80*79*17000*500=5.4e10 samples.
• FFT:– quicker, but requires data to be on a regular
grid.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
How to regrid the samples?
Could simply add samples in each box.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
But this can be expressed as a convolution.
Samples convolved with a square box.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Convolution gridding.
• ‘Square box’ convolver is
• Gives
• But the benefit of this formulation is that we are not restricted to a ‘square box’ convolver.– Reasons for selecting the convolver carefully will be
presented shortly.
vvuuGvuVdvduV kjkj ,,,
else. 0 ,5.0,5.0,for 1, vuvuG
vuVdvduV kj ,
5.0,5.0
,
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
What does this do to the image?
• Fourier theory:– Convolution Multiplication.– Sampling onto a grid ‘aliasing’.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
A 1-dimensional example ‘dirty image’ ID:
V I via direct FT:
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
A 1-dimensional example ‘dirty image’ ID:
Multiplied by the FT ofthe convolver:
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
A 1-dimensional example:
The aliased resultis in green:
Image boundariesbecome cyclic.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
A 1-dimensional example:
Finally, dividingby the FT of theconvolver:
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Effect on image noise:
Direct FT Gridded then FFT
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Aliasing of sources – none in DT
This is a direct transform. The green box indicatesthe limits of a gridded image.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Aliasing of sources – FFT suffers from this.
The far 2 sources are now wrapped or ‘aliased’into the field – and imperfectly suppressed by thegridding convolver.