national competitiveness of thailand...

18
POSTAL POSTAL NETWORK NETWORK & & MILLENIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS MILLENIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS By Dr. Piyachart Phiromswad Dr. Sabin Srivannaboon Dr. Taka Fujioka Dr. Pongsak Hoontrakul By Dr. Piyachart Phiromswad Dr. Sabin Srivannaboon Dr. Taka Fujioka Dr. Pongsak Hoontrakul National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008

Upload: others

Post on 31-Dec-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

POSTAL POSTAL NETWORKNETWORK

& &

MILLENIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALSMILLENIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS

By

Dr. Piyachart Phiromswad

Dr. Sabin Srivannaboon

Dr. Taka Fujioka

Dr. Pongsak Hoontrakul

By

Dr. Piyachart Phiromswad

Dr. Sabin Srivannaboon

Dr. Taka Fujioka

Dr. Pongsak Hoontrakul

National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008

Page 2: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

2

What is national competitiveness?: General misunderstanding

National competitiveness is not about gaining global market shares alone

National competitiveness is not about exchange rate alone

National competitiveness is not about the degree of perfect competition in markets

National competitiveness is much broader!

See e.g. P., Krugman, (1996), “Making Sense of The Competitiveness Debate.”

Page 3: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

3

Inst

ituti

ons

Infr

astr

uct

ure

Mac

roec

onom

ic s

tabil

ity

Hea

lth &

Pri

mar

y E

du

cati

on

Hig

her

Edu

cati

on &

Tra

inin

g

Good M

arket

Eff

icie

ncy

Lab

or

Mar

ket

Eff

icie

ncy

Fin

anci

al M

arket

Sop

his

tica

tion

Tec

hnolo

gic

al R

eadin

ess

Mar

ket

Siz

e

Busi

nes

s S

ophis

tica

tion

Innovat

ion

PRODUCTIVITY

WELL-BEING OF PEOPLE

What is national competitiveness?

12 Pillars from The World Economic Forum (WEF)

Factors, institutions, and environment

that enhance the productivity of

enterprises that lead to better well-

being of people

(The Global Competitiveness Report 2008-2009, p. 3)

Page 4: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

4

Performance of Thailand at 2008World ranking (out of 134 countries) based on the

Global Competitiveness Index of WEF 2008

Among broad groups of

countries, Thailand national

competitiveness is in the

top-tier

1093.531,701Cambodia

714.093,219Philippines

704.12,454Vietnam

554.253,519Indonesia

504.332,599India

344.67,682Thailand

304.75,046China

215.0412,631Malaysia

135.2823,363S. Korea

115.3339,953Hong Kong

95.3831,607Japan

55.5347,488Singapore

15.7443,227USA

World RankingScores

WEF 2008GDP per capita in

2007

(PPP $)

Countries

Page 5: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

5

Important strengths and weaknesses

How to improve national competitiveness of Thailand?

Improving

National

Competitiveness

Maintaining

Important

Strengths

Overcoming

Important

Weaknesses

Page 6: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

6

Performance of Thailand at 2008Important strengths of Thailand: World ranking (out of 134 countries)

based on the Global Competitiveness Index of WEF 2008

Infrastructure, labor market

efficiency, and market size

are important strengths of

Thailand.

97

92

93

86

72

29

47

23

15

5

11

4

7

Infrastructure

33

101

47

43

89

13

51

19

41

4

11

2

1

Labor market

efficiency

95Cambodia

34Philippines

40Vietnam

17Indonesia

5India

21Thailand

2China

28Malaysia

13S. Korea

26Hong Kong

3Japan

41Singapore

1USA

Market sizeCountries

Page 7: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

7

Important strengths and weaknesses

Important strengths

Labor market efficiency (13th)• Cooperation in labor-employer relations (17th)

• Low non-wage labor costs (20th)

• Low Rigidity of employment (21st)

Market size (21st)• Large domestic market size (23rd)

• Foreign market size (18th)

(Physical) infrastructure (29th)• Ground transportation (32nd)

• Air transportation (28th)

We show factors that are strengths of pillars (from 134 countries)

Page 8: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

8

Performance of Thailand at 2008Important weaknesses of Thailand: World ranking (out of 134 countries)

based on the Global Competitiveness Index of WEF 2008

Institutions, health, and

technological readiness are

important weaknesses of

Thailand.

103

105

71

68

53

57

56

30

28

9

26

1

29

Institutions

111

90

84

87

100

58

50

23

26

43

22

16

34

Health and

primary

education

123Cambodia

70Philippines

79Vietnam

88Indonesia

69India

66Thailand

77China

34Malaysia

13S. Korea

10Hong Kong

21Japan

7Singapore

11USA

Technological

readinessCountries

Page 9: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

9

Important strengths and weaknesses

Important weaknesses

Institutions (57th)• cost of terrorism (107th), reliability of police services (71st), ethical behavior of

firms (69th), property right (61st), public trust in politicians (64th), transparency in government policy making (60th), organized crime (63rd) and efficacy of corporate boards (66th): in sum, many weaknesses in institutions

Health (58st)• HIV (108th)• Malaria (93rd)• Tuberculosis (96th)

Technological readiness (66th)• Broadband internet subscribers (94th)• Internet users (78th)• Personal computers (72nd)• Mobile phone subscribers (72nd)

We show factors that are weaknesses of pillars (from 134 countries)

Should be viewed as “general

purpose technology”

Page 10: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

10

Stages of development

Factor driven

stage

Thailand

Efficiency driven

stage

Innovation driven

stageTransition Transition

According to The World Economic Forum

(see The Global Competitiveness Index 2008-2009, p. 7-9

Page 11: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

11

Recommendations Maintain our strengths

• Maintain the quality and reliability of Thai’s export products (we do not want to repeat the mistake of China!)

• Maintain labor market efficiency and existing physical infrastructure

Overcome our weaknesses

• Address the unrest in the southern provinces

• Put more resource toward health-related issues

• Address the fundamental problem of Thailand’s institutions appropriately

• Improve Thailand readiness in technology adoption

Factor driven

stageTransition

Factor driven

stage

Factor driven

stage

Transition

Page 12: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

12

FutureTalents • Promote skill development in organizations• Promote education

– Mindset: Enhance entrepreneurship (basic education)– Technical: Math, science, and engineering (higher education)

• Raise awareness of the collaboration in universities and business• Immigration policy

– Attract international talents

Infrastructure• Construct science parks• Raise awareness of the collaboration in universities and business• Enhance information communication technology

Investment • Tax reduction • Increase research grants for universities and research institutes• Increase R&D investment

Factor driven

stageTransition

Factor driven

stage

Factor driven

stage

Transition

Page 13: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

13

ENDAny questions or comments, please kindly contact:

[email protected] or

[email protected]

All rights reserved @ 2008

Page 14: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

Piyachart Phiromswad, Ph.D.

Education

Doctor of Philosophy, Economics: UNIVERSITY OF

CALIFORNIA Davis, CA, USA (December 2007)

Master of Arts, Economics: UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI

St. Louis, MO, USA

Bachelor of Economics (International Program),

THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY, Bangkok, Thailand

Page 15: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

Piyachart Phiromswad, Ph.D.

Research/Expertise

Macroeconomist with experience in the areas of Economic Growth, and Monetary Economics.

A member in WEF executive opinion survey working group for Thailand (a joint collaboration between Sasin and TDRI) in 2007.

Research: Econometrics and causal search algorithms with application in the areas of Economic Growth and Monetary Economics.

Page 16: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

16

Extra: Most Problematic Factors (from the perspective of CEO)

Source: World Economic Forum (Oct 08)

Page 17: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

17

Extra: Ranking and raw score for 12 pillars

Page 18: National Competitiveness of Thailand 2008tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/g1_Dr.Piyachart.pdfChina 5,046 4.7 30 Malaysia 12,631 5.04 21 S. Korea 23,363 5.28 13 Hong Kong 39,953

18

GDP (PPP $US) Per capita 1980-2007

Source: World Economic Forum (Oct 08)