national frequency allocation table, licensed vs. unlicensed spectrum use international...
TRANSCRIPT
National Frequency Allocation Table, Licensed vs. Unlicensed spectrum use
International Telecommunication UnionTelecommunications Development Bureau
ITU Regional Workshop on Efficiency of theFrequency Spectrum Use in the Arab Region
Amman-Jordan, 5-7 Dec. 2011
Dr. Arturas MedeisisITU-BDT Spectrum Management Expert
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 2
Scope of presentation • Role, principles and structure of NFAT
• Developing and publicising NFAT
• Licensing status of different services
• Comparative overview of different licensing types:– individual– general == un-licensed use– light-licensing
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 3
Role of NFAT• Most important piece of national SM
legislation
Policy
ArtefactsPractice
Telecoms Law, NFAT, rules
NRA
Licence
Monitoring
EnforcementIndividual
General
Radio
Market
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 4
Role of NFAT (II)• The legal instrument for transposition of ITU RR
provisions into national law• Sets the founding and ground-rules for the use
of radio spectrum• May contain some additional legal/technical info:
– type of licensing– technical provisions (channelling, power limits, etc.)– future strategy for the frequency band
• Important to keep in mind the balance of providing additional information vs. consideration of frequency of updates!
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 5
Principles of NFAT• Consistency with ITU RR provisions for
respective region:– NFAT may specify not all services allowed by
RR for given region/frequency band!
• Consistency with any applicable regional spectrum harmonisation initiatives
• Sub-allocations and designations to specific uses/applications:– E.g. RR: Mobile Service -> NFAT: Public
Cellular
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 6
Principles of NFAT (II)• Important role of NFAT as setting the
national departmental SM limits (if any!):– e.g. civil vs. military frequency bands– domains of specialised authorities
(broadcasting, aeronautical, maritime)
• although ideally all spectrum management should be concentrated in the hands of one authority for the sake of maximum efficiency!
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 7
Structure of NFAT• Terms and definitions
• NFAT (sometimes different tables for different parts of spectrum)
• Applicable international footnotes
• National footnotes
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 8
NFAT examples (I)
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 9
NFAT examples (II)
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 10
NFAT examples (III)
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 11
Developing and maintaining• The NFAT is a living document!• The most obvious updating cycle is linked to the
WRCs, however more frequent changes might be needed depending on national content
• Important to include all stakeholders/major spectrum users into the review and updating process:– to ensure most optimal partitioning of spectrum– to ensure understanding and commitment by all
spectrum users
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 12
NFAT publication• Traditional way: hard copy (PDF on the
website)
• Fancy way: wall charts
• Increasingly: electronic online databases!
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 13
Electronic publication example
www.rrt.lt
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 14
Licensing status• May be embodied directly in NFAT or, by
default, by a principle of exclusion:– every radio apparatus which is not granted
any special spectrum access rights by separate governmental order is subject to individual license
– i.e. the users may look up any “special spectrum access orders”, and if their desired apparatus/network/radio frequency band is not provided for, they should apply to NRA for licence
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 15
Individual licensing• Hence the default type is Individual Radio
Apparatus Licence:– given equipment type– at a given place– with a given antenna (type/gain/height)– at a given frequency channel(s)
• This is the absolute safest harbour for both NRA and the user as it provides maximum certainty and security
• But more elaborate types are required to cope with modern times...
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 16
Unlicensed spectrum use• Also known as General Authorisation• Establishes use of radio devices without
individual authorisation• Is suitable for radio services/devices that
have self-containable interference potential
• Two variants may be distinguished:– Licence-exempt application – Commons Band or ISM Band
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 17
Licence-exempt applications• Licence-exempt access usually means a
an order exempting very specific application(s) from individual licensing:– e.g. Mobile phones, Short Range Devices,
VSAT, radio amateurs etc– may be one or more bands associated– some “blanket” conditions are imposed, i.e.
maximum power limit, adherence to some co-existence protocol requirements, compliance with OOB limits, etc. (these often defined in the “equipment standard”)
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 18
Commons Band• In this case the order decrees a certain
band available for use by “any device” :– best example – 2.4 GHz ISM band– still some “blanket” conditions are necessary
to contain the interference, but expressed in a more general way, such as maximum power limitation or other similar generic (technology neutral) requirements of RF emissions, cf. well known example of FCC Part 15 rules
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 19
Benefits of unlicensed use• For industry:
– easier development of low cost wireless devices– economies of scale, cheap RF modules for commons
bands– harmonisation between different countries– simplicity for users
• For NRAs:– reduction of administrative work– no need for planning, coordination– providing for development of innovative industries
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 20
Drawbacks of unlicensed use• For industry:
– no protection from interference– no quality of service assurance for users– usually quite low power limits reduce
communications range
• For NRAs:– uncontrolled growth in number of devices may
bring interference to unacceptable levels– marginal loss of licensing revenues
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 21
Light-licensing (I)• A novel type of licensing, suitable for services which:
– are characterised by high and fluid demand– have a significant mutual interference potential– yet their protection can be established by simple
means/calculation method
• In this case it might be easier for NRA to withdraw from daily handling of these numerous coordination requests
• Instead providing some kind of simplified notification or even automated self-service licensing, e.g. user self-registration of radio devices in an online database with automated interference check– hence, simplified/self-service==light
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 22
Light-licensing (II)• Having some kind of registration
procedure allows:– control/limit the number of devices– collect some nominal fees, both as means of
incentive pricing and to recover licensing costs (i.e. IT application/database maintenance costs)
• Still, even “light” registration requires certain professionalism on the part of the user/operator
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 23
Light-licensing (III)• Examples of services/applications
considered suitable for “light-licensing”:– GNSS ground repeaters– repeaters in public cellular systems– VSATs in harmonised FSS bands– FWA/BWA base stations in dedicated bands
(e.g. 5.8 GHz)– mm-band short-to-medium range (1-3 km) FS
Point-to-Point links– Radio Amateur, Maritime (Ship) stations
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 24
Light-licensing implementation• Via online licensing systems of NRA
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 25
Comparison of different regimesIndividual authorisation(Individual rights of use)
General authorisation(No individual rights of use)
Individual licence Light-licensing Licence-exempt
Individual frequency planning / coordination
Traditional procedure for issuing licences
Individual frequency planning / coordination
Simplified procedure compared to individual licensing
With limitations in the number of users
No individual frequency planning / coordination
Registration and/or notification
No limitations in the number of users nor need for coordination
No individual frequency planning / coordination
No registration nor notification
Source: CEPT ECC Report 132
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 26
General picture
Source: CEPT ECC Report 137
General Authorisations Individual authorisations
Licence exemption License: Administrative
assignment
License:Market mechanisms
Generic uses
Specificuses
Light Licensing
(registration/notification)
Privatecommon
s
Flexibility and spectrum
trading
Authorisation:
Licensing regime:
Management approach:
Collective use of Spectrum
Increasing protection
No fee Cost recovery Incentive prices Fees set by market
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 27
Other important novel terms• Underlay spectrum access:
– a kind of unlicensed spectrum use based on assumption of secondary non-protected non-interfering very low power access, i.e. with emissions below the noise levels of primary service, hence “underlay”, example: UWB
• Overlay spectrum access:– future technology of “intelligent” interspersing of
secondary transmissions in the unused spectrum spaces of primary user. Also known as Dynamic Spectrum Access. Most advanced development: TV White Space Devices
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 28
Conclusions• The NFAT is a very important regulatory
document that sets the ground rules for national SM
• The choice of licensing regime for given frequency band is not a trivial task
• Novel licensing regimes, such as Light-Licensing or Unlicensed use (as well as Underlay and Overlay uses) may bring important degrees of flexibility for NRAs and facilitate more efficient use of spectrum through deployment of innovative wireless services
ITU Regional Workshop, Amman, 5-7 Dec 2011 29
Thank you!
Dr. Arturas [email protected]
ITU: Committed to connecting the World