national greenhouse and energy reporting (measurement
TRANSCRIPT
1
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, the
Honourable Greg Combet AM MP
National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Amendment Determination 2011
(No. 1)
The National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 (the Act) established the National
Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (NGER) system which is a national system for reporting
greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and energy production by Australian
corporations.
The National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Determination 2008 (the
Determination) was made under subsection 10(3) of the Act, which provides for the Minister
to determine methods, or criteria for methods, for the measurement of (a) greenhouse gas
emissions; (b) the production of energy; and (c) the consumption of energy.
This Instrument will amend the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement)
Determination 2008.
The National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Amendment Determination
2011 (No.1) (the Instrument) aims to achieve the following:
update scope 2 emissions factors for the consumption of electricity which require annual
adjustment in line with dispatch decisions within the National Electricity Market made
throughout the last financial year;
respond to feedback from stakeholders and industry groups; and
provide clarification of methodologies to improve the consistency and accuracy of emission
estimates.
The Instrument will commence on registration and apply to the 2011-2012 financial year. It
will affect NGER reports submitted by corporations in October 2012.
Details of the amendments to the Instrument are set out in the Attachment.
The Instrument is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act
2003.
Consultation
In drafting these amendments NGER reporting entities and other interested stakeholders have
been consulted.
With the release of the initial Determination, a commitment was made to review the methods
and factors provided within 5 years. To meet that commitment, the Department of Climate
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
2
Change and Energy Efficiency (the Department) released the National Greenhouse and
Energy Reporting (Measurement) Determination Discussion Paper in August 2010. Thirty-
eight (38) submissions were received, covering the range of issues identified in the paper.
After reviewing the submissions and the outcomes of consultation with industry groups, the
government released the NGER (Measurement) Amendment Determination Consultation
Draft in May 2011 for further consultation. At the same time, the Department released a
detailed response paper of issues addressed in the discussion paper. The Department received
a further 12 submissions from industry and the public on the consultation draft. After
consideration of the submissions final refinements were made to the Instrument, consistent
with the results of consultation.
Background
The initial Determination was the result of comprehensive consultation with business and
other stakeholders between May 2005 and June 2008 in relation to the Act, the National
Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Regulations 2008 (the Regulations) and the Instrument.
The initial Instrument was the subject of specific consultations, including the release of two
documents for public comment: National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting System,
Technical Guidelines for the Estimation of Greenhouse Emissions and Energy at Facility-
Level; and Energy, Industrial Process and Waste Sectors in Australia - Discussion Paper and
a related overview paper. Over 70 formal submissions were received from interested
organisations and individuals.
A range of the issues identified in the Discussion Paper and raised during the consultation
process have been addressed in this amendment to the Instrument. A number of issues are
also being addressed through amendments to the Regulations, which will be implemented in
2011.
Overview of the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement)
Determination 2008
The Act established the legislative framework for the NGER system. The Act provides for an
integrated reporting system with the objectives of:
informing government policy formulation and the Australian public;
meeting Australia’s international reporting obligations;
assisting Commonwealth, State and Territory government programs and activities;
underpinning the introduction of an emissions trading scheme in the future; and
avoiding duplication of similar reporting requirements in the States and Territories.
The Act makes reporting mandatory for corporations whose energy production, energy use,
or greenhouse gas emissions meet certain specified thresholds.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
3
The Determination, made under subsection 10(3) of the Act, provides the criteria for
establishing methodologies and methods for estimating and measuring the following items
from the operation of facilities:
greenhouse gas emissions;
the production of energy; and
the consumption or energy.
The structure of the Determination is designed to facilitate the integration of corporate and
facility level data provided under the Act with international data standards on greenhouse gas
emissions.
The scope of the Determination is given by the following categories of emission sources:
fuel combustion – emissions from the combustion of fuel for energy (see chapter 2);
fugitive emissions from the extraction, production, flaring, processing and distribution
of fossil fuels (see chapter 3);
industrial process emissions where a mineral, chemical or metal product is formed
using a chemical reaction that generates greenhouse gases as a by-product (see chapter
4); and
waste emissions from waste disposal – either in landfill, as management of
wastewater or from waste incineration (see chapter 5).
The most important source is fuel combustion, which accounts for over 60 per cent of the
emissions reported in the national greenhouse gas inventory.
The scope of the Determination does not include land based emissions covered by the IPCC
categories ‘Agriculture’ and ‘Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry’. Emissions from
fuel combustion by land based industries are, nonetheless, covered by this Determination.
Methods of measurement
The Determination provides methods that allow for both direct emissions monitoring and the
estimation of emissions through the tracking of observable, closely-related variables. This
framework reflects the approaches of the international guidelines governing the estimation of
national greenhouse gas inventories and international practice such as for the EU Guidelines
for the Monitoring and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the US Environment
Protection Agency Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting Rule.
At its simplest, emissions may be estimated by reference to reportable data such as fossil fuel
consumption, evidenced by invoices, and the use of specified emission factors provided in the
Determination. For emissions from fuel combustion, for example, data on fuel consumption
would be multiplied by a specific emission factor for that fuel to generate an emissions
estimate. A similar approach was used for over a decade prior to the commencement of the
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
4
NGER system in the voluntary reporting program Greenhouse Challenge Plus and, before
that, Greenhouse Challenge.
More complex measurement processes may produce more accurate estimates at a facility
level through sampling and analysis of the carbon content within fuel consumed and other
qualities that affect actual emissions generated by its combustion at a facility. This approach
to emissions estimation has been used for some time, especially in the electricity sector under
the Generator Efficiency Standards program.
Direct monitoring, while not common, is an important approach to emissions estimation and
is mandatory for the measurement of emissions associated with underground coal mining
activities. State legislation requires methane levels to be monitored directly for occupational
health and safety reasons.
By drawing on existing emissions estimation practices, where possible, the Amendment
Determination aims to minimise reporting burdens on corporations and encourage reporters
to balance the costs of using higher order methods with the benefits of potentially more
accurate emissions estimates.
The Determination provides four different methods of estimating emissions for most
emissions sources. A summary of each method used in the Determination is provided below.
Method 1: The National Greenhouse Accounts default method
Method 1 provides a class of estimation procedures derived directly from the methodologies
used by the Department for the preparation of the National Greenhouse Accounts. This also
ties Method 1 to the international guidelines adopted by the UN Framework Convention on
Climate Change for the estimation of greenhouse gas emissions.
Method 1 specifies the use of a designated emissions factor in the estimation of emissions.
These emissions factors are national average factors determined by the Department using the
Australian Greenhouse Emissions Information System (AGEIS). Method 1 is most useful
and appropriate for emission sources of a homogenous nature, such as emissions from the
combustion of a liquid fuels, where the emissions per unit of fuel combusted across all
reporting facilities will be similar.
Method 2: Facility specific methods using Australian or international standards provided in
the Determination or equivalent.
Method 2 enables corporations to undertake additional measurements, for example, of fuel
inputs, in order to gain more accurate estimates of emissions for that facility. Australian and
International standards provide the benchmark for procedures used for the analysis of fuel
inputs.
Method 2 is most likely to be useful for fuels which exhibit variability in key qualities such
as carbon content from facility to facility. This method is based on technical guidelines that
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
5
existed under the Generator Efficiency Standards program. The possibility to report using
this higher order method is encouraged by the Department for all major consumers of fossil
fuels.
Method 3: Facility specific sampling and analysis in line with Australian and international
standards provided in the Determination.
Method 3 builds upon Method 2 and requires reporters to comply with Australian or
equivalent standards for sampling (of fuels or raw materials) as well as standards for the
analysis of fuels.
Method 4: Direct monitoring of emissions systems, either on a continuous or periodic basis.
Method 4 aims to directly monitor emissions arising out of a particular activity and can
provide high level accuracy in certain circumstances. This method differs from lower order
methods in its focus on the direct outputs of the activity rather than the inputs. Direct
monitoring occurs in the area of underground coal mining reflecting the existing need to
closely and accurately monitor emissions for health and safety reasons.
As for Methods 2 and 3, there is a substantial body of documented procedures on monitoring
practices and State and Territory government regulatory experience that provide the principal
sources of guidance for the establishment of such systems.
Options: Different methods for different sources
Reporters may select different methods for each source. The Reporter may elect to use a
different method based on the nature and content of the operation and emissions, subject to
certain restrictions. In part, these differences reflect method availability. For example, for
solid fuels, only Method 1 has been provided for methane and nitrous oxide, reflecting the
minor nature of the emission sources, whereas four methods are available for carbon dioxide.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
6
ATTACHMENT A
Details of the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Amendment Determination 2011 (No.1)
Item 1 – Name of Determination
This item provides that the title of the Instrument is the National Greenhouse and Energy
Reporting (Measurement) Amendment Determination 2011 (No. 1).
Item 2 – Commencement
This item provides for the amendments in Schedule 1 to commence on 1 July 2011. The
amendments in Schedule 2 commence on 1 July 2012
Item 3 – Amendment of National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting
(Measurement) Determination 2008
This item outlines that Schedule 1 and 2 amend the National Greenhouse and Energy
Reporting (Measurement) Determination 2008 (the Determination).
Item 4 – Application
This item clarifies that the amendments made in Schedule 1 will apply to the 2011-2012
financial year and subsequent financial years. Schedule 2 will apply to the 2012-2013
financial year and subsequent financial years.
SCHEDULE 1 AMENDMENTS
The explanations of amendments provided below are grouped by division within the NGER
Determination. Individual amendment items are referenced to the amendment number as
stated in the NGER Amendment Determination 2011.
CHAPTER 1 GENERAL
The proposed amendments to Chapter 1 of the Determination add additional definitions
required to complement changes to the manufacture of solid fuels.
Part 1.1 Overview, Division 1.1.2 Definitions and Interpretations
Item Commentary
[1]-[3] Adds definitions for coal briquettes, pyrolysis of coal and corrects the title
of the GHG Uncertainty Protocol.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
7
Part 1.2 General, Division 1.2.1 Measurement and Standards
The amendment changes the definition of completeness to provide more certainty for
industry. The completeness principle is clarified to only include emissions sources that are
explicitly identified within Determination section 1.10.
Item Commentary
[4] Amends the definition of completeness.
Part 1.3 Direct measurement of emissions, Division 1.3.2 Operation of method
4 (CEM)1, Division 1.3.3 Operation of method 4 (PEM)2
The amendment clarifies that for sources where there is no Method 1 available in the
Determination, the Method 4 estimations using continuous or periodic emissions monitoring
are not required to be reconciled.
Item Commentary
[5] Includes an exclusion where there is no Method 1 available for the source.
CHAPTER 2 FUEL COMBUSTION
Part 2.2 Emissions released from the combustion of solid fuels, Division 2.2.1
Preliminary
The amendment addresses concerns of small electricity generators in relation to the use of
higher order methods to estimate emissions from the combustion of their primary solid fuels
where these requirements do not exist for other industries. The amendment establishes a
threshold excluding small generators from the requirement to use higher order methods based
on thresholds used in the Generator Efficiency Standards program.
Item Commentary
[6] Grammatical correction.
1 Continuous Emissions Monitoring
2 Periodic Emissions Monitoring
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
8
[7] Method 2 or higher must be used when the principle activity of the facility
is electricity generation, and the generating unit has the capacity to
produce 30 megawatt or more of electricity, and generates more than
50,000,000 kilowatt hours of electricity in a reporting year.
Part 2.2 Emissions released from the combustion of solid fuels, Division 2.2.3
Method 2 – emissions from solid fuels
The furnace ash and fly ash sampling requirements to identify key characteristics of ash,
including carbon content, are set out in the Determination. The amendment allows alternate
collection methods to be used when the those methods are not feasible.
The existing approach of sampling fly ash as a function of load has a significant cost
imposition and evidence has shown that the variation in carbon in relation to load to be
relatively narrow for large base load electricity generators. Exceptions occur in cases where
load profiles vary significantly throughout the operation of the facility, or at times when
operating conditions change.
Item Commentary
[8] Grammatical correction.
[9] Allow the use of alternate furnace ash collection methods that provide
representative sampling, where technical and safety concern make clauses
(a) and (b) not feasible.
[10] Allows the use of alternate fly ash collection procedures that provides
representative samples, where technical and safety concerns make the
procedures outlined in the table in section 2.11 not feasible.
The sampling frequencies for fly ash in the table in section 2.11 are
amended to include additional sampling obligations when there are
significant changes in operating conditions. If there are no changes to
operating conditions the existing sampling frequencies are maintained.
Part 2.3 Emissions released from the combustion of gaseous fuels, Division
2.3.1 Preliminary
Similarly to the amendment to Part 2.2, this amendment addresses concerns of small
electricity generators in relation to the use of higher order methods to estimate emissions
from the combustion of their primary gaseous fuels, where these requirements do not exist for
other industries. The amendment establishes a threshold excluding small generators from the
requirement to use higher order methods based on thresholds used in the Generator
Efficiency Standards program.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
9
Item Commentary
[11] Method 2 or higher must be used when the principle activity of the facility
is electricity generation, and the generating unit has the capacity to
produce 30 megawatt or more of electricity, and generates more than
50,000,000 kilowatt hours of electricity in a reporting year.
Part 2.4 Emissions released from the combustion of liquid fuels, Division
2.4.5A Methods for estimating emissions from carbon dioxide using an
estimated oxidation factor
Petroleum based oils and greases are regularly consumed for transport purposes, particularly
within combustion engines. This amendment clarifies the application of the method to
include the consumption of petroleum based oils and greases for transport purposes. Minor
clarifications have also been included to make the Determination consistent.
Item Commentary
[12] Removes the restriction ‘for stationary energy’ purposes and clarifies the
means by which the quantity is to be measured through reference to 2.4.6.
[13] References to the quantity of petroleum based oils and greases are aligned
throughout the section by replacing Cpog with Qpog. In addition, the term
‘waste oil’ is replaced with ‘transferred offsite’ to avoid confusion. Some
oils transferred offsite are not considered waste.
Part 2.5, Emissions released from fuel use by particular industries, Division
2.5.2 Energy – manufacture of solid fuels
The manufacture of solid fuels is undertaken using a range of materials and techniques. The
current Determination restricts the estimation of emissions to fuels manufactured within coke
ovens. Char production, for example, had been identified as another source of emissions. In
order to accommodate this, Division 2.5.2 will apply to the manufacture of all solid fuels and
use a carbon mass balance approach. The division is also split to distinguish those production
plants that form part of an integrated metalwork, which are referred to Part 4.4, and those
manufactured separately, that will use the carbon mass balance approach outlined in
Subsection 2.58.
Item Commentary
[14] Replacement of the source name to remove coke ovens restriction.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
10
[15] Specifies the scope of fuel manufacturing covered within the source to
those produced through the pyrolysis of coal or coal briquette process.
Further definitions have been added in Section 1.08. Other solid fuels that
can be reported within this source include: coke oven coke, coke breeze,
foundry coke and retort coke; coal char and coal briquettes.
[16] Establishes a carbon mass balance approach to measuring emissions for
the manufacture of solid fuels. Where the fuel is manufactured as part of
an integrated metal production process, the emissions are to be estimated
using Part 4.4. For all other circumstances the method outlined in
subsection (3) must be used.
[17] Details the estimation approach and parameters for calculating emissions
from the manufacture of solid fuels using a carbon mass balance approach.
CHAPTER 3 FUGITIVE EMISSIONS
Part 3.2 Coal Mining – Fugitive emissions, Division 3.2.2 Underground mines
Coal mine waste gases that mainly consist of methane (CH4) may include a component of
carbon dioxide (CO2) gas that is not combusted during flaring. The amendment allows the
CO2 component to be accounted for separately from the majority methane component that is
flared. This results in a more accurate emissions estimate.
Item Commentary
[18] Corrects a missing reference.
[19] Refines the formula for estimating CO2 emissions from coal mine waste
gas, by allowing reporters to sample and account for the CO2 within the
waste gas separately from the flared methane component. This applies
only to Method 2 and higher.
Part 3.3 Oil and natural gas – fugitive emissions, Division 3.3.2 Oil or gas
exploration
The fugitive flaring emissions from oil or gas exploration may include a component of carbon
dioxide (CO2) gas that is not combusted during flaring. The amendment allows the CO2
component to be accounted for separately from the flared methane (CH4) component. This
results in a more accurate emissions estimate. The existing Method 2 for methane emissions
has been withdrawn as throughput based emission factors are inappropriate for Method 2.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
11
Item Commentary
[20] Withdrawal of Method 2 for estimating methane emissions.
[21] Refines the formula for estimating CO2 emissions from oil or gas
exploration, by allowing reporters to sample and account for the CO2
separately from the flared methane component. This applies only to
Method 2 for gaseous fuels and higher.
Part 3.3 Oil and natural gas – fugitive emissions, Division 3.3.3 Crude oil
production
The fugitive flaring emissions from crude oil production may include a component of carbon
dioxide (CO2) gas that is not combusted during flaring. The amendment allows the CO2
component to be accounted for separately from the flared hydrocarbon component. This
results in a more accurate emissions estimate. The existing Method 2 for methane emissions
has been withdrawn as throughput based emission factors are inappropriate for Method 2.
Item Commentary
[22] Withdraws the availability of Method 2 for estimating methane emissions.
[23] Clarifies the removal of Method 2 for methane estimation.
[24] Refines the formula for estimating CO2 emissions from crude oil
production, by allowing reporters to sample and account for the CO2
within the gas separately from the flared methane component. This applies
only to Method 2 for gaseous fuels and higher.
[25] Grammatical correction.
[26] Withdraws Method 2 for estimating methane emissions for crude oil
production (flared).
Part 3.3 Oil and natural gas – fugitive emissions, Division 3.3.5 Crude oil
refining
The fugitive flared emissions from crude oil refining may include a component of carbon
dioxide (CO2) gas that is not combusted during flaring. The amendment allows the CO2
component to be accounted for separately from the flared hydrocarbon component. This
results in a more accurate emissions estimate. The existing Method 2 for methane emissions
has been withdrawn as throughput based emission factors are inappropriate for Method 2.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
12
Item Commentary
[27] Withdraws the availability of Method 2 for estimating methane emissions.
[28] Clarifies the withdrawal of Method 2 for methane estimation.
[29] Subscript correction.
[30] Refines the formula for estimating CO2 emissions from crude oil refining,
by allowing reporters to sample and account for the CO2 within the gas
separately from the flared methane component. This applies only to
Method 2 and higher.
[31] Amends the Method 3 to be based on Method 2 instead of Method 1.
Part 3.3 Oil and natural gas – fugitive emissions, Division 3.3.8 Natural gas
distribution
Clarification of the boundaries of existing variables within the estimation method used to
calculate emissions from natural gas distribution. Changes include minor textual and
subscript updates.
Item Commentary
[32] Corrects subscript references in the formula.
[33] Matches subscript references to the formula.
[34] Matches subscript references to the formula.
[35] Matches subscript references to the formula.
Part 3.3 Oil and natural gas – fugitive emissions, Division 3.3.9 Natural gas
production or processing (emissions that are vented or flared
The fugitive flared emissions from natural gas production or processing may include a
component of carbon dioxide (CO2) gas that is not combusted during flaring. The amendment
allows the CO2 component to be accounted for separately from the flared hydrocarbon
component. This results in more accurate emissions estimates. The existing Method 2 for
methane emissions has been withdrawn as throughput based emission factors are
inappropriate for Method 2.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
13
Item Commentary
[36] Withdraws the availability of Method 2 for estimating methane emissions.
[37] Clarifies the withdrawal of Method 2 for methane estimation.
[38] Refines the formula for estimating CO2 emissions from natural gas
production and processing, by allowing reporters to sample and account
for the CO2 within the gas separately from the flared methane component.
This applies only to Method 2 and higher.
[39] Amends Method 3 as an extension of Method 2 instead of Method 1
CHAPTER 4 INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES
Part 4.2 Industrial processes – mineral products, Division 4.2.2 Lime
production
The emission estimates from lime production are affected by the quantity of lime kiln dust
produced. The amendments update the method for estimating emissions to include those
related to the production of lime kiln dust, a by-product of lime production. Additional
standards are referenced to assist reporters.
Additional default factors relating to production of dolomitic and magnesian lime are added
to Method 1, reflecting the different emissions profiles.
Item Commentary
[40] Updates Method 1 to include emissions from the calcinations of lime kiln
dust in the production process.
Addition of default factors and definitions for magnesian and dolomitic
lime to reflect emissions generated from higher magnesium carbonate
content in the limestone.
Includes, in Method 2, analysis of Calcium Oxide (CaO) and Magnesium
Oxide (MgO) contained within the carbonate source used for producing
lime.
[41] Adds additional standards for reporters to reference when sampling and
analysing the composition of lime.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
14
Part 4.2 Industrial processes – mineral products, Division 4.2.3 Use of
carbonates for production of a product other than cement clinker, lime or soda
ash
Specifies that phosphoric acid is to be reported within this source. Other amendments reflect
stylistic updates.
Item Commentary
[42] Amendment adds emissions from phosphoric acid production to the
positive list of activities that are to be reported within this source.
[43] Amendment italicizes the title of the referenced standard.
Part 4.3 Industrial processes – chemical industry, Division 4.3.5 Chemical or
mineral production, other than carbide production, using a carbon reductant
or carbon anode
The method for estimating emissions is updated to a carbon mass balance method. This
refinement takes account of carbon embedded within products and waste by-products which
do not occur as an emission. Modifications are made to the source name and source
application to clarify the scope of emissions included in the source.
Item Commentary
[44] Changes the source heading to include emissions from chemical and
mineral production using a carbon anode.
[45] Adds emissions from fused alumina, magnesia and zirconia to the positive
list of activities to be reported within this source.
[46] Details the estimation approach and parameters for calculating the
emissions from chemical or mineral production using a carbon mass
balance approach.
Part 4.4 Industrial processes – metal industry, Division 4.4.1 Iron, steel or other
metal production using an integrated metalworks
Clarifies the scope of emissions within the source to include iron and steel production that
uses an electric arc furnace, or consumes coke produced offsite. Other metals such as lead
and silicon can continue to use this method if it is part of an integrated metalworks.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
15
Item Commentary
[47] Expands the method for the estimation of emissions from iron and steel to
include all production techniques; and other metals that form an integrated
metal works, i.e. manufacture of a metal and coke in an integrated
production process.
CHAPTER 5 WASTE
Part 5.2 Solid waste disposal on land, Division 5.2.2 Method 1 – emissions of
methane released from landfill
Currently the Determination uses a default value, obtained from the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines, of 0.5 for the fraction of degradable organic carbon
dissimilated (DOCf). Drawing on changes to the method used in the National Greenhouse
Gas Inventory the amendment identifies the DOCf values based on specific waste mix types,
improving the accuracy of waste emissions estimates.
Item Commentary
[48] Grammatical correction.
[49] Replaces the default DOCf value used for Method 1 estimation listed in the
IPCC guidelines with values, specified by waste mix type, listed in section
5.14A.
[50] Inserts a list of DOCf values separated by waste mix types for use in
Method 1 estimation.
Part 5.2 Solid waste disposal on land, Division 5.2.3 Method 2 – emissions of
methane released from landfill
Currently the Determination uses a default value, obtained from the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines, of 0.5 for the fraction degradable organic carbon
dissimilated (DOCf). Drawing on changes to the methods used in the National Greenhouse
Accounts the amendment identifies the DOCf values based on waste mix types, improving the
accuracy of waste emissions estimates.
Item Commentary
[51] Replaces the default DOCf definition used for Method 2 estimation with
specified values based on waste mix types listed in section 5.14A.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
16
Part 5.3 Wastewater handling, Division 5.3.2 Method 1 – methane released from
wastewater handling (domestic and commercial)
The symbol ‘F’ used in the Determination to refer to the fraction of COD (chemical oxygen
demand) anaerobically treated is inconsistent with the IPCC guidelines. The amendment
updates the ‘F’ with ‘MCF’ (methane correction factor) to make it consistent. This is an
update to terminology and has no impact on the estimation method.
Item Commentary
[52] Replaces Fwan and Fslan with MCFww and MCFsl in the formula in line with
the IPCC guidelines.
[53] Replaces the definition of Fwan, with MCFww to make it consistent with the
formula.
[54] Replaces the definition of Fslan with MCFsl to make it consistent with the
formula.
[55] Inserts the definition for Methane Correction Factor (MCF).
Part 5.3 Wastewater handling (domestic and commercial), Division 5.3.3
Method 1 –emissions of nitrous oxide released from wastewater handling
(domestic and commercial)
The amendment updates the estimation method for nitrous oxide emissions to clarify the
methods for obtaining Nin, Ntrl, and Ntro values and differentiating the estimation of nitrogen
leaving the plant by aquatic environment.
Item Commentary
[56] Substitution of 5.31 (1) to include additional estimation guidance for Nin,
Ntrl, and Ntro by providing formulas and definitions.
Re-orders and includes definitions and emissions factors for nitrogen
leaving the plant by discharge environment.
Part 5.4 Wastewater handling (industrial), Division 5.4.1 Preliminary
Restates the application of the part to remove nitrification and denitrification processes that
are not part of the method.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
17
Item Commentary
[57] Amends the statement outlining the application of the part to remove
nitrification and denitrification processes that do not apply to the source.
Part 5.4 Wastewater handling (industrial), Division 5.4.2 Method 1 – methane
released from wastewater handling (industrial)
The amendment includes COD (chemical oxygen demand) leaving the plant as effluent
(CODeff) in the estimation method for wastewater to allow for its subtraction from emissions
estimates. This makes the estimation method consistent with domestic and commercial
wastewater handling.
In addition, the symbol ‘F’ used in the Determination to refer to the fraction of COD
anaerobically treated is inconsistent with the IPCC guidelines. The amendment updates the
‘F’ with ‘MCF’ (methane correction factor) to make it consistent. This is a change in
terminology and has no impact on the estimation method.
Item Commentary
[58] Replaces Fwan and Fslan with MCFww and MCFsl in the formula for
CH4gen.
Inclusion of CODeff that was omitted into the formula for CH4gen.
[59] Defines the CODeff values added to the formula for CH4gen.
[60] Replaces the definition of Fwan, with MCFww to make it consistent with the
formula.
[61] Replaces the definition of Fslan with MCFsl to make it consistent with the
formula.
[62] Replaces an occurrence of Fwan with MCFww for consistency.
[63] Replaces an occurrence of Fwan with MCFww for consistency.
[64] Inserts the definition of methane correction factor (MCF).
Part 5.5 Waste incineration
Amendment adds Method 4 to the available methods for waste incineration to improve the
consistency of available with methods available for fuel combustion.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
18
Item Commentary
[65] Adds Method 4 reporting for waste incineration.
CHAPTER 6 ENERGY
No changes
CHAPTER 7 SCOPE 2 EMISSIONS
No changes
CHAPTER 8 UNCERTAINTY
Part 8.3 How to assess uncertainty when using method 1
Clarification to the estimation of uncertainty for energy content factors to allow the use of
specific uncertainty levels estimated in accordance with section 7 of the GHG Protocol
guidance on uncertainty assessment in GHG inventories and calculating statistical parameter
uncertainty. Also includes minor scope adjustments and the inclusion of uncertainty levels for
Aluminium production.
Item Commentary
[66] Allows for uncertainty levels for energy content factors to be estimated
using the GHG Protocol Guidance on Uncertainty Assessment in GHG
Inventories and Calculating Statistical Parameter Uncertainty.
[67] Removal of ‘vented’ under item 8 to allow vented emissions to use the
uncertainty value of 50.
[68] Inclusion of emission factors and activity uncertainty levels for emission
estimates from aluminium production.
SCHEDULE 1
Inclusion of additional fuel types and update of the Scope 2 emission factors that are updated
annually in line with dispatch decisions within the National Electricity Market made
throughout the last financial year. Minor amendment removing a black coal definition that
has been superceded.
Item Commentary
[69] Removal of supplementary black coal definition that has been superceded.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
19
[70] Inclusion of additional fuel types used in the transport industry with
associated energy content and emissions factors.
[71] Annual update of scope 2 emission factors reflecting changes within the
National Electricity Market in the last financial year.
Further Amendments
Item Commentary
[72] Minor amendments including:
• correction of incorrect or obsolete references;
• update of standards to latest versions;
• changes to terms for consistency; and
• clarification of two fuel type names in Schedules 1, 2 and 3.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
20
SCHEDULE 2 AMENDMENTS
These amendments commence on 1 July 2012.
Part 4.4 Industrial processes – metal industry, Division 4.4.1 Ferroalloys
production
The method for estimating emissions is updated to a carbon mass balance method to align
available methods with those used in iron and steel. This refinement takes account of carbon
embedded within products and waste by-products which do not occur as an emission.
Item Commentary
[73] Details the estimation approach and parameters for calculating the
emissions from ferroalloys production using a carbon mass balance
approach.
Part 4.4 Industrial processes – metal industry, Division 4.4.1 Other metals
production
The method for estimating emissions is updated to a carbon mass balance method to align
available methods with those used in iron and steel. This refinement takes account of carbon
embedded within products and waste by-products which do not occur as an emission.
Item Commentary
[74] Details the estimation approach and parameters for calculating the
emissions from other metals production using a carbon mass balance
approach.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315
21
ATTACHMENT B
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Chapter 1 General
The following standard can be obtained at: http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-
tools
GHG Uncertainty protocol guidance on uncertainty assessment in GHG
inventories and calculating statistical parameter uncertainty (September 2003)
v1.0
Chapter 4 Industrial processes emissions
Section 4.15
The following standard can be obtained at: http://www.saiglobal.com/shop/Script/search.asp
ASTM C25-06 Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Limestone,
Quicklime, and Hydrated Lime.
Section 4.15
The following standard can be obtained at: http://www.saiglobal.com/shop/Script/search.asp
ASTM C50-00 (2006) Standard Practice for Sampling, Sample Preparation,
Packaging, and Marking of Lime and Limestone Products.
Section 4.15
The following standard can be obtained at: http://www.saiglobal.com/shop/Script/search.asp
AS 4489.0–1997 Test methods for limes and limestones — General introduction
and list of methods.
Section 4.33
The following standard can be obtained at: http://www.saiglobal.com/shop/Script/search.asp
ASTM C25-06 Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Limestone,
Quicklime, and Hydrated Lime.
Explanatory Statement to F2011L01315