national society for earthquake technology-nepal (nset) isdr asia partnership meeting 29-31 march...

NATIONAL SOCIETY FOR

EARTHQUAKE TECHNOLOGY-NEPAL (NSET)

ISDR Asia Partnership Meeting29-31 March 2011 Jakarta Indonesia

Local Level Pilot HFA Workshop Nepal

7-8 March 2011 Kathmandu

www.nset.org.np1

Home Previous Next

Background

5 Countries Selected for the Pilot Workshop • Enabling dialogue state and non-state actors• Bringing together national and local level

perspectives• Identify gaps, formulate actions to accelerate

progress of the HFA at national and local levels.

• Replicable models of multi-stakeholder engagement at national and local levels.

04/21/23 Local Level Pilot HFA Workshop in Nepal 2

Home Previous Next

Workshop Objectives

• To initiate a multi stakeholder dialogue at the local level with local specific set of indicators that contributes to

the national level dialogue and the reporting process;

• To introduce a local HFA monitoring and review framework and gather feedback on the tools and processes; and

• To reach consensus and mutual understanding among different national and local actors on the needs and priorities for disaster reduction, leading to agreed actions and collaborative approaches to accelerate implementation of the HFA.

04/21/23 3Local Level Pilot HFA Workshop in Nepal

Home Previous Next

Who was involved

• Central Government, MOHA, MOLD, MPPW, Security.

• Local Government, concerned departments, DDC, Mun.

• UN Agencies, UNDP, UNICEF, INGOs.

• Civil Society Organizations, National & Local networks.

• Grassroots Community Representatives• Corporate Sector, Business institutions, Contractors.

• Education institutions

• Professional Societies.04/21/23 4Local Level Pilot HFA Workshop in Nepal

Home Previous Next

Workshop Methodology

• Opening Session

• Thematic Presentations

• Focused Group Discussion, SWOT Analysis

• Discussions on Way forward based on SWOT 04/21/23 5Local Level Pilot HFA Workshop in Nepal

Home Previous Next

Main Outcomes

• Multi stakeholders dialogue in HFA monitoring initiated.

• Consensus on necessity of HFA Progress Review at various levels.

• Stakeholders aware about the process and complicacy of the monitoring process involved.

• Agreed to look for potential ways to inbuilt the HFA monitoring with the ongoing evaluation mechanism at various levels.


Home Previous Next

VFL- 2009 Nepal

RespondentsLocal Govt.

Civil Society Organizations

Community Rep.

Total

Response Received

30 18 17 65


Home Previous Next

VFL- 2011 Nepal

RespondentsLocal Govt.

CSO Community Rep. Others Total

Response Received

95 49 94 127 365


Home Previous Next

Dolpa

Humla

Mugu

Dang

Kailali

Doti

Gorkha

Jumla

Bajangh

Mustang

Rukum

Ilam

Mygdi

Kaski

Surket

Taplejung

Bajura

Rolpa

Sindhuli

Banke

Manang

Chitwan

Salyan

Solukhumbu

Bara

Bardiya

Dolakha

Darchula

Jhapa

Palpa

Jajerkote

Morang

Parsa

Dhading

Sankhuwasava

Baglung

Baitadi

Udayapur

Achham

Makwanpur

Kalikote

Dailekh

Bhojpur

Lamjung

Saptari

Khotang

Gulmi

Siraha

Rasuwa

Sarlahi

Tanahun

Nawalparasi

Sindhupalchoc

Kapilbastu

Sunsari

Pyuthan

Kanchanpur

Dhanusa

Dadeldhura

Syangja

RupandehiRamechhap

Nuwakote

PantchtharRautahat

Mahottari

Kavrepalancho

Dhankuta

Arghakhachi

Parbat

OkhaldhungaTerathum

Lalitpur

Kathmandu

Challenges

National and Local Level what is the limit ?

National Level

District Level75 Districts

Municipality / VDC level58 Municipalities, 4900+ VDCs

Ward LevelClusters and Settlements


Home Previous Next

Challenges

• Coverage of “Local Level”

– What is the Local Level? District, Municipality, Village Dev. Committees, Wards, Clusters, Settlements.

• DRR is a new issue to most of the Districts HFA is unknown to even those working actively for DRR.

• Geographical Remoteness

• Financial and Human Resources


Home Previous Next

Challenges

• Political Instability & low priority to DRR

• How to reduce the gaps in between the outcome of the local level review with that of the National Level HFA Review?


Home Previous Next

The Way Forward

• Monitoring to be a continuous process.

• HFA Core Indicators along with the VFL to be used by the relevant participating institutions.

• Streamline the process with the existing monitoring evaluation process at various level.

• Seek Support from UNISDR and other Agencies for financial and technical assistance.


Home Previous Next

The Way Forward

• NSET to continue working as a facilitator

• MOHA along with MOLD to initiate coordinated monitoring process at the local level.

• Municipalities and VDCs to lead the monitoring process at their respective areas in close coordination with districts

• The tools may need to be revised to include Cross Cutting issues in the monitoring process


Home Previous Next

THANK YOU


Home Previous Next

Main Outcomes

• Key outcomes / achievements from the Local Level against the 05 HFA Priority areas (as result (SWOT) of presentation made during the group works)– Priority 1 (Significant achievements)

– Priority 2 (Significant achievements)




• (More slide can be included, but should not exceed one slide per Priority area)

• Key Constraints / Challenges in achieving progress against HFA Indicators at local level.


Home Previous Next

Proposed Process /Mechanism at

Local Level for HFA Review What is the recommended process at the local level?

Comments on the current indicators for the HFA review at the local level and suggestions for revision

Does the current process and indicators take the Cross cutting issues such as gender, disability, age into account? If not what are your recommendations?

Can it be done through integrating it with existing mechanisms / process at the local level?

Who should lead the process at the local level?

What will be the coordination mechanism between local and national level?

Who should be involved in the process at the local level?

What would be the time-line?04/21/23 16Local Level Pilot HFA Workshop in Nepal

Home Previous Next

Challenges in carrying out HFA review at the local levels

– Can it be done in all districts, if no; What would be the representative sample size for the districts?

– Other challenges?

– How its is going to complement the National Level HFA Review process?

– Resources?


national society for earthquake technology-nepal (nset) isdr asia partnership meeting 29-31 march...

Documents