national urban transport programmes and policies_hanoi_january2016
TRANSCRIPT
1
National Urban Transport
Programmes and Policies
Stefan Bakker
GIZ Consultant, [email protected]
Sustainable Urban Transport and Climate Change training,
Hanoi 14 January 2016
2 15/01/2016
International Review of National
Urban Transport Policies and
Programmes
Brazil
Colombia
France
Germany
India
Mexico
United Kingdom
United States of America
Available for download in English
and Chinese from
www.sustainabletransport.org
Financing Sustainable Urban Transport
3 15/01/2016
Financing
Technical
Capacity
Planning
Institutions
Framing national urban transport policies
4
Te
ch
nic
al a
nd
fin
an
cia
l c
on
tro
l
15/01/2016
From central to decentral
National Government
Focused programme with
technical requirements,
e.g. MRT
Mass transit project
(BRT/ LRT/ Suburban trains)
National Government
Urban transport fund
Centralised System Decentralised System
State or municipal governments
Te
ch
nic
al a
nd
fin
an
cia
l c
on
tro
l
Many different transport projects
based on local needs
State or municipal governments
5
Germany: National Level Funding
Sources
15/01/2016
Federal Local Transport
Financing Law (GVFG)
• Started in 1971 as part of a
major upgrading in transport
infrastructure
• Focus on investments
• Co-financing transport
projects by 75% (for East
Germany up to 90%)
• Co-financing large scale
local rail infrastructure (> 50
mln Euro) by 60%
Federal Regionalized
Transport Law (RG)
• Started in 1993 jointly with
major railway reform
• Focus on operational
subsidies mainly for regional
rail
• 6.5 billion Euro (currently)
• Channeling all funds to the
provinces/Länder (according
to a share based on the
number of inhabitants)
6 15/01/2016
Provides funds (e.g. from fuel taxes) to provinces for specific programmes and projects
Defines criteria such as cost-benefit analysis, environmental impact assessment, public participation etc.
Regulates market access of transport operators and minimum standards
Require comprehensive mobility plans from cities
Provide funds to cities and identify projects
Fund regional railways such as S-Bahn (tendering services)
Initiate Regional Transport Associations (Verkehrsverbund)
Plan and finance infrastructure projects (with support from provinces) based on regional public transport plans
Tender public transport services and define quality criteria in service contracts
Subsidies local transport operators
Issue special tickets to students and senior citizens
NA
TIO
NA
L
PR
OV
INC
IAL
MU
NIC
IPA
L
Split of Responsibilities across Government Levels
10 15/01/2016
Lessons learned
Reliable national funding is needed to foster urban sustainable
transport
National urban transport policies and funding have been essential in
creating comprehensive public transport systems in many countries
No one size fits all – funding schemes evolve as capacities grow
Capacity development for comprehensive mobility planning is required
The maintenance trap
Tap additional revenues for sustainable urban transport in parallel to
national funding schemes: TDM, land value capture und reduction of
fuel subsidies
Explore NAMAs to foster national urban transport policies and financing
mechanisms
12
China Transit Metropolis Programme
• Framed by Transit Priority Policy
• Encourages and supports cities in improving their public transport
systems, inter-modal integration, and TOD.
• Activities in 37 pilot cities.
• National level defines indicators, nominates pilot cities, approves of city-
level activities and takes decisions on funding provided.
• The Ministry of Transport also organises capacity development and
peer-learning events on an annual basis.
• Implementation of the measures themselves sole responsibility of cities.
• MOT supported by various (state-owned) research institutes
13
China Transit Metropolis Programme
The impacts of the Transit Metropolis Programme result from:
■ The definition of transit system requirements and the provision of co-
finance for the improvement and expansion of public transport (and non-
motorised transport) infrastructure;
■ The requirement of an integrated transport plan, which should
enhance integrated transport planning and thereby increase the
attractiveness of multimodal public transport, leading to higher mode
shares of public transport and reduced car use; as well as spurring travel
demand measures to limit private car use;
■ Provision of co-finance for the improvement of bus technologies,
leading to improved fleet efficiencies.
14 15/01/2016
3 Leverage Points to Move Ahead
Combination of national-provincial-local
sustainable funding mechanisms
• Chinese National Urban Low Carbon Transport Fund
• Land-use/property taxes & transit oriented development
• Transport demand management strategies
Comprehensive mobility planning
• Consolidating existing guidance and policies into a national urban
transport policy
• Link funding to comprehensive mobility plans
• Provide capacity building and performance monitoring
Coordinate responsibilities
• Great potential of regional transport alliances for regional integrated
transport services
• Unify responsibilities under transport bureaus (including rail)
1
2
3