naval personnel and training research laboratory · adwl*' um**mtaonrtidal mvokt »ten««...

ADWL*' um**m TaonrtidAL MVOKT »ten«« NAVAL POSTQUAOUATt MQNZIMX. CAUBORNIA

AD

NAVAL PERSONNEL AND TRAINING RESEARCH LABORATORY

SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 92152

RESEARCH REPORT SRR 72-22 APRIL 1972

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NAVY CLASSIFICATION TEST SCORES AND FINAL SCHOOL GRADES IN 98 CLASS "A" SCHOOLS

Patricia J. Thomas

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

1* rfHfiMiBHilta ■fHMHyi

Thomas, P. J. The relationship between Navy classification test scores and final school grade in 98 Class "A" schools. San Diego: Naval Personnel and Training Research Laboratory, April 1972. (Research Report SRR 72-22, PF55.521.005.01.AA)

SUMMARY

Background and Problem

The Basic Test Battery (BTB), an important tool in the Navy's enlisted classification system, has been developed to predict performance in Navy schools. Men scoring well above the minimum selection scores are expected to demonstrate greater school success than those who are assigned to the schools with minimum or waivered scores. The purposes of this report were to determine if the BTB is meeting this goal and if the findings of similar reports covering earlier time periods hold true for recent samples.

Approach

Grades collected between January 1969 and January 1971 from almost all "A" Schools were employed as criteria. Validities of the selection test composites were compared with validities obtained from samples collected two years previously. Graphs depicting the relationship between selection composites and school grades were prepared for each of 98 schools. Academic attrition percentages were computed for the data available from each school.

Findings

1. The correlations between school grades and scores on selection composites were generally higher than those reported previously (page 4)

2. The grades of the majority of men who were assigned to the schools despite substandard BTB scores were satisfactory. Ninety-five percent of these relatively low-aptitude men graduated from the Class "A" school assigned (page 5).

3. The attrition rate was unusually high in three schools, even among students whose BTB selector test scores were 10-12 points above the operational cutting score (page 9).

Conclusions

The results of the previous reports concerning the BTB validities were substantiated (page 9). Changes in the cutting scores for certain schools should be considered (page 9).

UNCLASSIFIED Security Classification

DOCUMENT CONTROL DATA -R&D Security classification of till», body of abstract and indexing annotation must be entered when the overall report is clateified)

CRiCiN* TING ACTIVITY (Corporate author)

U. S. Naval Personnel and Training Research Laboratory San Diego, California 92152

2«. RETORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

UNCLASSIFIED 2b. GROUP

3 REPORT TITLK


4 DESCRIPTIVE NOTES (Typ* ot report and indue iv* data»)

5 A,, THOR'SI fFiritt name, middle initial, lm*t name)

Patricia J. Thomas

6 REPORT DA TC

April 1972 7*. TOTAL NO OF PAGES

75 76. NO. OF REFS

S*. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. 9«. ORIGINATOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S)

b. PROJECT NO 521.005.01.AA SRR 72-22

»6. OTHER REPORT N O IS) (Any other numbers tbml may be «a signed this report)

10 OlSTRI BUTION STATEMENT

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

II. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12. SPONSORING MILI TARY ACTIVITY

Chief of Naval Personnel (Pers-A3) Navy Department Washington, D. C. 20370

3. ABJSTRAC T

The Basic Test Battery (BTB), an important tool in the Navy's enlisted classification system, has been developed to predict performance in Navy schools. Men scoring well above the minimum selection scores are expected to demonstrate greater school success than those who are assigned to the schools with minimum or waivered scores. The purposes of this report were to determine if the BTB is meeting this goal and if the findings of similar reports covering earlier time periods hold true for recent samples.

Grades collected between January 1969 and January 1971 from almost all "A" Schools were employed as criteria. Validities of the selection test composites were compared with validities obtained from samples collected two years previously. Graphs depicting the relationship between selection composites and school grades were prepared for each of 98 schools. Academic attrition percentages were computed for the data available from each school.

The major findings were: (1) The correlations between school grades and scores on selection composites were generally higher than those reported previously. (2) The grades of the majority of men who were assigned to the schools despite substandard BTB scores were satisfactory. Ninety-five percent of these relatively low-aptitude men graduated from the Class "A" school assigned. (3) The attrition rate was unusually high in three schools, even among students whose BTB selector test scores were 10-12 points above the operational score.

It was concluded that the results of the previous reports concerning the BTB validities were substantiated. Changes in the cutting scores for certain schools should be considered.

DD FORM 1473 (PAGE I) UNCLASSIFIED 0f02-01«-«600 Security Classification


KEY WO RDS ROLE W ROLE WT RO L E WT

Predictive validity Selection tests Cutting Scores Basic Test Battery School performance

DD ,FH°O?..1473 'BACK) (PAGE 2)


AD


Patricia J. Thomas

April 1972

521.005.01.AA Research Report SRR 72-22

Submitted by

B. Rimland, Ph.D., Director, Personnel Measurement Research Department

Approved by

E. I. Jones, Ph.D., Technical Director Karl E. Kuehner, Commander, USN

Commanding Officer

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

Naval Personnel and Training Research Laboratory San Diego, California 92152

A LABORATORY OF THE BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL

SUMMARY

Background and Problem

The Basic Test Battery (BTB), an important tool in the Navy's enlisted classification system, has been developed to predict performance in Navy schools. Men scoring well above the minimum selection scores are expected to demonstrate greater school success than those who are assigned to the schools with minimum or waivered scores. The purposes of this report were to determine if the BTB is meeting this goal and if the findings of similar reports covering earlier time periods hold true for recent samples.

Approach

Grades collected between January 1969 and January 1971 from almost all "A" Schools were employed as criteria. Validities of the selection test composites were compared with validities obtained from samples collected two years previously. Graphs depicting the relationship between selection composites and school grades were prepared for each of 98 schools. Academic attrition percentages were computed for the data available from each school.

Findings

1. The correlations between school grades and scores on selection composites were generally higher than those reported previously (page 4)

2. The grades of the majority of men who were assigned to the schools despite substandard BTB scores were satisfactory. Ninety-five percent of these relatively low-aptitude men graduated from the Class "A" school assigned (page 5).

3. The attrition rate was unusually high in three schools, even among students whose BTB selector test scores were 10-12 points above the operational cutting score (page 9).

Conclusions

The results of the previous reports concerning the BTB validities were substantiated (page 9). Changes in the cutting scores for certain schools should be considered (page 9).

in

REPORT USE AND EVALUATION

Feedback from consumers is a vital element in improving products so that they better respond to specific needs. To assist the Chief of Naval Personnel in future planning, it is requested that the use and evaluation form on the reverse of this page be completed and returned. The page is preaddressed and franked; fold in thirds, seal with tape, and mail.

Department of the Navy Postage and Fees Paid Navy Department

Official Business

Commanding Officer Naval Personnel and Training Research Laboratory San Diego, California 92152

Report Title & No- THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NAVY CLASSIFICATION TEST SCORES AND FINAL SCHOOL GRADES IN 98 CLASS "A" SCHOOLS. (SRR 72-22)

1. Evaluation of Report. Please check appropriate column.

FACTORS LOW RATIN AVG

G HIGH COMMENTS

Usefulness of Data

Timeliness

Completeness

Technical Accuracy

Validity of Recommen- dations

Soundness of Approach

Presentation and Style

Other

2. Use of Report. Please fill in answers as appropriate.

a. What are your main uses for the material contained in the report?

b. What changes would you recommend in report format to make it more useful?

c. What types of research would be most useful to you for the Chief of Naval Personnel to conduct?

d. Do you wish to remain on our distribution list?

Please make any general comments you feel would be helpful to us in planning our research program.

NAME: CODE:

ORGANIZATION:

ADDRESS:

VI

CONTENTS

Page

SUMMARY iii

A. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

B. PROCEDURE

1. Sample and Data Acquisition 2. Variables 3. Analysis of Data 3

C. RESULTS 3

1. Stability of the Validities of BTB, Form 7 4 2. Students with Selection Score Waivers 5 3. Schools with Attrition Rates Exceeding Five Percent ... 5

D. CONCLUSIONS 9

REFERENCES 9

APPENDIX 11

TABLES

1. Comparison of the Uncorrected Validities of BTB Selectors for 1966-68 Samples and 1969-70 Samples

2. Comparison Between the Percentage of Academic Attrition for Total Sample and Attrition for Samples Included in Graphs . .

3. Percentage of Academic Drops in Three Successive Selector Test Intervals for Each of 12 Schools with an Academic Attrition Rate of More than Five Percent

Vll


A. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The primary determinants of whether an enlisted man receives formal school training for a rating, as opposed to on-job training only, are the scores he earns on the Basic Test Battery (BTB). The BTB is expected to discriminate between men who can succeed in a Class "A" school and those who cannot. This means that scores on test composites used in school selection should be significantly and substantially correlated with school grades. The great majority of men scoring above the established minimum on the BTB composites relevant for an "A" School should pass the course, while men scoring below that minimum and admitted to the school on special waivers would be expected to perform less well in school training. In previous reports (Thomas, 1969; Thomas, 1972) the BTB was found to be doing an effective job. The purposes of this report are to provide an updated evaluation of the BTB for predicting final school grades and to determine the stability of the findings over an extended period of time.

B. PROCEDURE

1. Sample and Data Acquisition

Final grades for students are routinely forwarded to this Labora- tory by all Class "A" schools. Data received during calendar years 1969 and 1970 for students who graduated or who failed from these schools for academic reasons form the basis for this graphic report.

All men discharged from the Navy or on inactive duty status at the time of the analyses were not included in the sample since their BTB scores were unavailable. Non-academic drops were excluded because selector tests are not designed to predict such criteria. Schools having fewer than 70 students with complete predictor and criterion data were not analyzed. The total sample consisted of 100,150 men graduating or dropping from 98 Class "A" schools between 1 January 1969 and 1 January 1971.

2. Variables

a. Predictors. Six of the basic and special tests in the Navy Classification Battery were used as predictors. Scores are reported as Navy Standard Scores having a mean of about 50 and a standard devia- tion of about 10 for an unrestricted recruit population. The tests used were:

(1) General Classification Test (GCT)--consisting of 60 verbal analogy and 40 sentence completion items with a single 35-minute time limit.

(2) Arithmetic Reasoning Test (ARI)—consisting of 30 arithmetic reasoning items with a 35-minute time limit.

(3) Mechanical Test (MECH)--consisting of two separately timed 50-item subtests yielding a single score. The tool knowledge section has a 10-minute time limit and the mechanical comprehension section has a 25-minute time limit.

(4) Clerical Test (CLER)—consisting of 100 number matching items. This highly speeded test has a 5-minute time limit.

(5) Shop Practices Test (SP)--consisting of 30 items with a 17- minute time limit.

(6) Electronics Technician Selection Test (ETST)--consisting of three separately timed sections: Mathematics (20 items in 25 minutes); Science (20 items in 15 minutes); and Electricity and Radio (30 items in 20 minutes). A single score is obtained.

Scores on these tests are summed for various two- and three-test composites to determine eligibility for Class "A" schools. The test combinations used for school selection are called "selectors" throughout this report.

Men scoring below the minimum selection score may be assigned to Class "A" schools under certain circumstances. Recruits may have up to six points waived on two-test composites or up to nine points waived on three-test composites if: (1) the supply of fully qualified recruits falls below the number required to meet school quotas; or (2) the recuits have been enlisted under the direct procurement program for high school and junior college graduates. Fleet personnel may have the same number of points waived on their selection scores; or, if they have shown proficiency in a rating, they may be assigned to school training in that rating with permission from the Bureau of Naval Personnel despite non- qualifying BTB scores.

b. Criteria. The Final School Grade (FSG), used as the major criterion in this report, is most commonly a weighted sum of grades earned on daily and/or weekly quizzes, measures of practical proficiency, and the score on the final examination.

Another criterion of interest is the pass-fail status of the student. As stated earlier, only school graduates and academic failures are included in this report. Because of the methods of statistical analysis used to prepare the graphs, the attrition rates reported in the Appendix are based on the students having complete predictor and criterion data. For some schools, due to incomplete reporting, this attrition rate is an underestimate of the actual number of academic drops.

3. Analysis of Data

The students from each school were treated as separate samples in the analyses. The validity of the selector and the median FSG were determined for each school, as was the academic attrition rate for the students in each sample. An additional attrition analysis was performed, based on all available data, to determine whether the percentages of academic drops in the samples were realistic.

Since school assignment usually was contingent upon achieving a minimum score on several of the tests being validated, considerable restriction of range was evident in that the selector scores of the students within a school were higher than in the general recruit population, and the range of scores was considerably smaller. This results in lower test validities than would be obtained with more heterogeneous samples. The obtained validities were statistically corrected to yield estimates of test validities for a full-range recruit population as well as to present validities on a common base to make them comparable across schools. These corrected correlation coefficients, presented in the school graphs, are not strictly comparable to those in previous BTB reports because a different statistical correction method was used.

In constructing the graphs, the selector scores of students were arranged in rank order and combined into groups with intervals of from five to six score points, depending on whether two or three tests comprised the selector. The percentage of men in each interval who scored above the median Final School Grade was computed.

Various comparisons were made between the results of this study and those reported for the time period most recently analyzed (Thomas, 1972). The validities of the selection composites were compared to determine whether the effectiveness of the BTB is remaining stable. Failure rates for schools found to have high attrition in the previous study were examined to see if the attrition problem still exists in these schools. In addition, the data of the lower aptitude men were analyzed separately in an attempt to determine whether credence may be placed in the graduation rate found previously.

C. RESULTS

The detailed findings for the individual Class "A" schools are presented in the series of graphs in the Appendix. They are preceded

A correction technique for restriction of range, developed by Lawley (1943), was previously used. Recent work at this Laboratory led to the conclusion that this method yields inflated correlations when large inequities among the sample sizes of the variables occur, as is not uncommon with the BTB. Therefore, the more commonly used Pearson method of correction was applied in this study.

by an introductory page of notes that explain the abbreviations and statistical terms appearing on the graphs.

1. Stability of the Validities of BTB, Form 7

In the previous BTB graphic report (Thomas, 1972) it was reported that with the exception of GCT+CLER, the effectiveness of all of the selectors had increased slightly. This conclusion was based on a comparison of the mean corrected validities for 1966-1968 samples of students with those reported for 1964-1966 samples (Thomas, 1969). A similar comparison was made in the present study using the uncorrected validities of the selectors, since the method of correcting for restriction of range differed in these most recent reports. Table 1, below, presents the results of this analysis. The validity of the BTB is clearly higher for the more recent data.

In the 80 schools which used the same selector composites during the four years covered by these studies, an increase in validity was obtained in 45 schools, a decrease in 28 schools, and identical correlations in seven schools. Again, it appears that the effectiveness of BTB-7 as a classification instrument has increased somewhat with respect to the prediction of school performance.

TABLE 1

Comparison of the Uncorrected Validities of BTB Selectors for 1966-68 Samples and 1969-70 Samples

Selector N of Schools

GCT+ARI . 24

GCT+MECH+SP 34

GCT+CLER 6

ARI+2ETST 16

All Selectors 80

Note.--Individual school rs were weighted by the N_ of the school sample and averaged through the £ to £ trans- formation to obtain the average mean rs presented in this table.

Mean Validity 1966- 1969- 1968 1970

.48 .51

.44 .45

.35 .40

.49 .66

.46 .53

2. Students with Selection Score Waivers

The school performance of men whose selection scores were below the official cutting scores is of particular interest. A high success ratio suggests the minimum score could be lowered. Stewards were not included in the analysis of cutting scores because most were directly procured during the period covered by this study and were not required to meet a minimum score on any selector.

During the 1969-1970 period, 12 percent of the students entered with waivers, compared with the ten percent in the period covered by the previous report. The graduation rate among these students was 95.2 percent. Among the students who equalled or exceeded the operational cutting score, it was 98.6 percent. Thus, the conclusion that "the great majority of men who entered schools on waivers were able to graduate" (Thomas, 1972) continues to be true.

As mentioned previously, the analyses for the graphs in the Appendix were based on men having complete predictor and criterion data. Therefore, an additional analysis was performed to investigate the pos- sibility that school grades or test scores were more apt to be missing for dropped students than for graduates. If such a situation existed, the graduation rate of men with lower aptitude would be lower than is reported above.

Table 2 presents a comparison of the academic attrition rates that would have been reported if all students (those with both complete and incomplete data) had been used. The two columns of percentages are very similar. The greatest difference within any school between the attrition for all students and attrition reported in the graphs in the Appendix was less than four percentage points. While these results provide no answers concerning the number of students entering the schools versus the number for whom data were submitted, they do indicate that the men upon whom the analyses were based were representative of the total available sample in terms of the percentages of failures.

3. Schools with Attrition Rates Exceeding Five Percent

Twelve schools had academic failure rates exceeding five percent, suggesting that it might be desirable to raise the cutting scores for these ratings. To investigate this question, the percentages of academic drops were computed for the selector score interval and the next two intervals above it. An arbitrary standard of 90 percent probabil- ity of passing for those within the score interval was decided upon as the criterion of acceptability. These data are presented in Table 3.

In three of the 12 schools the attrition rate in the cutting score interval was less than ten percent, requiring no change in cutting score. Indications are that the minimum selection scores should be raised one interval in five schools and two intervals in one school.

u o 10

<4- X d<

C cd O ri

•H u P •H c U •H *J •P •a < CD

•n u 3

•H H

E U CD c

«a 1—I CT)

o in < CD

i—i 4-1 Q, o B

cd CM CD c^

W m ccj n rj 4-> 0 eq C < CD

<-H

H O C SH o U

.£! ■P

P P <

C V TJ CD C 3 CO Ö 0) CD

EC .—I a.

B e o aj in 00

•H (H ^H

Cd crt a*J E O o H u

m -C UH

c CO o U

IH •H u o P>

•H c CD u O bO 4-> cd p p < o c •—t

0 u e- o •H E rH E cd CD CD c/i 0- T3

cd rH

CD cd < CD c .—I CD O ft O -H E r< E CO CD CD CO

O. -O s 1—1

u crt <-1 vo a> MO

in^\0 N H

I-H rH n- o to oo o a> m o rH o O O <N CN O to O O

Wri^flNO H « O^f Ul

CN00HHO OOOOO

r~ in in i-i r~

vo ^ co tn CM

co o ^f in •* •*}■ ■* CN t-^ o IT, H vO ^t \C MO rH 00 f-« !"~ t H tN iH M H en N O H

i-t i-l CM i—I rH

■* m o o to

O MO r>- rH rH t^CTlOOCTi'a- tO^-CNTt-LO OOOlMHOl MO t-~ O r^ rH H W m M CO CN CN rH "* Cft tO ^t O MO HSOOrI ^t

rH i-t i—I i—I i-( tO tO

j fj f Oi "1 O) O i—I IN i—I vOO i—( r^ Ol t~- 00 CT> O to ■ri- in CN CN CN O m in C7> O rH CM * (O N M N S vO in Oi IO CN to to to to rH i—I o •"< O O O r-' "-< <—• O O r-IOO O O ■—I O >—I i—1 i—I i—I i—I i—I MO MO MO vO MO MO MO MO MO MO MO MO MO MO MO MO \D Ô vO vO vO Ô vO vO vO

crt oo H H E- U U U U U

OS H Z E- E- >- U U u u u a a

^ ^ a h 2 Q Q Q Q 0Ü

2 Z O O E- uunun

E- E- H H H w w w tu w

N CO (N CO O 000^000 OOvOr-IO OOOOO OOOOO

OOOCNO O00OOO OOCNOO OOOOO OOOOO

CD M cd ex

X QJ c c o

13 o 3 c

•H p c o CD

■a

cNvomrô OCOCNOO o o >—INO OOOOO OOOOO

oootoo 00>>-IOO OOtOO OOOOO 00"tfOO

ri 0OO1 MO to O O Ol LO in M »o H in

rH tO

(O NO) N l/l fvONvOO LO <N LO vO CTi i-H LO

IO N N Ol H CNLOOCNvO --ti-HCNOO O HN N H m w in w in in m m in in \0 vO vO vO vO vD MO M0 MO MO

m a. x »-5 os eoeoeaUQ QUJCJ^

u

M0 rH MO m CN MO 00 t~- CN <-H co a» ■** <N MO i—I i—I to i—l

r-. oo MO m o rH i-H o to to in m m m m MO MO MO MO M0

oo tu s o c/in < < < <

i-H to 00 <N O CTI cr> o^ ^ m Oi TJ- MO t-» t-~

Oi 00

to rH CN r~ 00 O tO tO tO CN in in w in in MO MO MO MO MO

m r-~ MO a> oo rH O Ol MO 00 ■^t ^t- tO rH tO

moHcom \0 m co ^- N O rH O rH O MO MO MO MO MO

z ^ E- > > < < < < < HDD

ca ca ea

CD 3 B

C O u

UJ ►J

!/) Ä P*

c cd o 5H

«4-1 -H U O +J

•H 0) 5-i £ 06 +J CO +->

4-> < <D C i—l

 o ,o £ E O 3 m z

M c

•H 4-> cd Di

10 X P-

C 01 o 5*

tH -H U O +J

•H C 0) SH O M -M CO +J +-> < <D c r—I 0 o P- O -H § 5H E ed <D <0 CO a. -o

ca r—1 u CCi < 4->

Ü H

o H

O tt) o ja

o 3 co z

bo C

cd

O O LO O O H <t CO HO CNOOOO OOOOO O « (O

OOIÔO Nlfl^HQ OOOOO OOOOO ooo

to

CM

o o to o o to LO to co o

oooooo cNint--oo

TJ-OOOO OOOOO

OOOOO OOOOO

OWN

ooo Ol

CM

t H IO Irt Ü1 >t vO M N 00 i—I t~- CO CN \0

LO rH CO r-(

N ^ H o VO o -t to o O >-1 "-H O "-I vO \0 Ô vO vO

oo in io o> W r- tO O rH L0 \OM(N H t

00 CJ> t^ "* 00 O rH O) LO f~- I~» i—I tO CN i—I

to T* \0 ft ft CN 00 tO LO rH CN rH rH rH rH

co in s <t HH to r^ TT

00 to

CM

& a u, en en

Ol O LO »O O Ifl N HH N U) \000>0 rH rH CN CN CN OOOOH OOLOOO vO vO Ô vO vO O vO ^D *0 *0

en Ui *S 2 2 H H E'- en en CO tO CO tO t/3

tO^'Tf-vOO^ tO h- 00 CN CM CO tO vO 00 LO LO 0000<H OOO \D \0 ^D '<V \D \D \D \D

H Z Z 3 >- >-

H LO i—I O O

O O rf- o o o o \o o o

o o -3- o o

O O rH O >—I

00 O rH O VO

o fi * en o

o to to \0 O CN

cd u > o

O \0 rH LO rH

ONHiON

rHi-~tooo oo^roo toocNOi-t oto«o o to tnt to

OO'CTOO 00^"00 O O rH O "^ OtOOOvOO O CN i—i \0 Is". rH CN

OlMJON <-ft CN o CN CN tO LO CN CN 'S-

tO MO tO H C* O "* rH 00 tO HtO H -t

\DI~-vO00r~- tfl MO O "I tOtOCNOCN H H N N CO rHrHOrHO rHrHOrHO vO \0 vO Ô Ô \0 ô ^ ô ô

iO \0 H to to to vO v£> rH eft 0> rH rH L0 CN f- rH

Tf" CN tO \0 rH oo Is» r*» \0 ^t OOOOO \0 \0 vO Ô vO

LOCN^t-vOÔ rHOLO'^'Ô VO tO N H •» N H IO * t tOCNtOr^-LO H (JMN r(

CN rH

H H H E- H UJ tu t-u tu Ci,

2 2 U CJ

00 Ol >o tO H \0 00 t CM to O O rH IT) O vO vD \0 vO vO

Di U w x z 2 cu a, a, a.

rH CN Cn 0» rH O O rH CN O rH rH LO LO O vO vO vO Ô vO

Z Z OS H 2 a. o. o- a. cr

<D to m rH in r> o to CN 00 CTi kO oo u «P. CL, <D

1—1 o o o 00 CT) o \D r<« TT "d- r- Tf to CM > cd u ft r-H to i~-t • H > CO o\° Q L(H

u 0) M rH

p c 0) c •H CTl CM \0 LO vO to ô r^ CTi CN CTi vO >

1—1 P z| LO CM 00 r^ o CN to r- CN CN to C7i o U P «J vO 00 to •—< rH <N O C T3 3 CM tp O e u O

o o to CTi 00 00 "* to 00 O» CTi ■* CTi t to U O <D i-( 0> a> > rH +J CO O. t/) 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 cd > X) u 00 LO to to o 00 to LO LO O LO O U u o 00 iH rH CN rH rH

 C P .H o c u- •H

t-H ■P C •H

p cd H to JS P (1) 4-> P H to M> LO 1—1 CN r- r-. <* ^0 to to CN t cd

d) 0 s CO u o\° Q o > co a) <L> 

■-I o <L> M cd a> p c rH \D rH i—1 00 O i—i LO rH CN O o rC

en <D c • H zl CM CNI r>> *■ CT. to LO vO t LO CTi t-» +-> h-1 p r^ 00 CN rH rH •-< o

a) ca «J p > OS P a

• H V) u T3 10 c M t>~ ■"3- CN CNI CTi fs CN •>* t CTi -r <j> a> to o •H u r<

to O *-> 0 o 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 p i 1 O O >H X o (N o r- r>» LO CN [^ o O LO O LO CL,

EU 3 M < co vO PH 0*1 r-^ o \D r^ rH ■-< rH r~* o f-t co P < 0 < <1> H

n Thre

demic

u

M to

•H cd to CN •* LO rH ^r to t^ Tt- CTi r^ CN ^d- •H o MH p. rH

to < o o CN r-~ CM i—I LT) vO oo hs r^ rH CN o a> PH h 1—1 CN r-H —1 •* •—t r—< rH CN p o c V o\° Q to h rt u cd • a o rH o

•a o cö C to U +-> co > o r» o CTl to CN •* LO 00 "* ■^r o» Cd rH)

•H >H ^ zl oo CN ■* -—I CN to to CTi CN LO Ô Tf cd e s oo a> ô 00 CN rH rH rC 0) B ♦J P >H

-d to •H c •H -a CO i—i p KH S 3 U O p rH CTl «C ^D t r—1 X) CTi CTi ^ CTl "* *J

<C o 3 <D vO o r^ r> o X> r^ O O •-i O o 13 </) , -C u rH 0 s t>« o LO r^ o o —1 O o CO O a> CM 6 -rH ÖOi-H > CO to a> P cd 3 a tu g g UJ

0, X 0, CL,

S o- CO § u

OS * * « * * * * PH

In the remaining three schools, the 90 percent passing standard could not be achieved even if the score were raised 10-12 points.

The results of the attrition analysis are similar to those reported for the 1966-1968 samples in seven of the schools (Thomas, 1972). The Polaris Electronics schools continued to report the highest rate of attrition of any Class "A" school, 26 percent during the most recent reporting period. As can be seen from the graph (page 47), the cutting score would have to be raised to an unrealistic level (ARI+2ETST=201) before 90 percent of the students in that interval would be predicted to pass the course. Changing the minimum scores for the other ratings would be feasible and is probably warranted, now that the previous findings have been found to be still applicable.

D. CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study clearly support the conclusions reached in the most recent study in this series; namely:

1. The BTB is an effective predictor of school performance.

2. The great majority of men who entered schools with BTB score waivers were able to graduate.

3. Adjustments (either upward or downward) in the cutting scores required for entrance to many Class "A" schools appear to be both warranted and desirable.

REFERENCES

Thomas, E. D. Navy Recruit Classification Tests as predictors of performance in 87 Class "A" enlisted schools (1964-1966). Sin Diego: U. S. Naval Personnel Research Activity, February 1969 (SRR 69-14)

Thomas, Patricia J. The relationship between Navy classification test scores and final school grade in 104 Class "A" schools. San Diego: Naval Personnel and Training Research Laboratory, January 1972. (SRR 72-15)

APPENDIX

Explanation of Terms on Graphs

School ABF Aviation Boatswain'* MatP (Firnis) (T) School Code 6512 (£) Locotion Lakehurst Graduates: _i£E_ Drops: 2 Total: 201

Selectors Q) GCT+MECH+SP=156

SUMMED >UMMbD _ JLDO SCORES ® TOTAL® DROPS®"

(D*

Above 191 6 186-191 14 180-185 16 174-179 22 168-173 26 162-167 33 156-161 30 150-155 2b 144-149 16 138-143 7 Below 138 5

0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

PERCENTAGE OF SCHOOL MARKS

Below Median Above Median

m $ 3L 75 50 25

UM B-»,gyyf/^iV-v^#-y. .:<i&&ffl

mtma mmw^mmMäkmmm tgmimsm

'Z~:&n3$

m^^^.

75

^£&S^v£&tä>^S$gz{®

iü..:

vmmMm&m hmmm@mm

tk^MimrtW^Msmt ixv&m^ZiSSS

kkm^^mzwMimm

BMMJMEM

^fe^fe^SSvl :$i%y$&?i-yz-M\

miw^^mm mM«±xmm&zm® wmm

Validity of Selectors - .39 (5) Corrected Validity of Selectors = .59 Qy)

Median = 78 (§) Attrition = 1.0% ©

100

Numbers below refer to encircled numbers in sample graph above:

(T) Title of school. If more than one school must be attended to complete the course of training, the phase offered by this school is given in parentheses.

(?) Four-digit code number as designated in BUPERS ltr Pers-B224-ss of 11 Jun 1971.

(3) Combination of BTB tests and cutting score used for selection to this school.

(7) Intervals of selector scores, ranging from high to low.

(?) Total number of students having selector scores within listed interval.

(ö) Number of academically disenrolled students who scored within listed interval.

(7) Interval within which lies the minimum score used in recruit assignment to school.

(¥) Median final school grade, based on all students in the sample.

9) Validity of selectors.

0) Validity of selectors corrected for restriction in range.

Th Percentage of academic failures.

11

School ABE Av. Boatswain's Mate ("Launching S RecoverylSchool Code 6513 Location Lakehurst Graduates: 426 Drops: 1 Total: 427

Selectors

GCT+MECH+SP=156

SUMMED SCORES

Above 191 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 Below 144

TOTAL

13 31 42 49 61 77 80 48 13 13

100 DROPS «"

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0



MDN y 5J) 75 75 -r 50 25 T-

m

czz

tmsmsn:

Hü

100 —^

mi

zzn —1

1

Validity of Selectors = .42 Corrected Validity of Selectors = .49

Median = 81 Attrition =0.2%

School ABF Av. Boatswain's Mate Location Lakehurst

fFuels") School Cod* 6512 Graduates: 247 Drops: 2 Total: 249

Selectors GCT+MECH+SP=156

SUMMED 100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SCORES IUIAL DROPS l"-

Above 191 6 0 186-191 11 1 180-185 19 0 174-179 30 1 168-173 44 0 162-167 41 0 156-161 20 0 150-155 38 0 144-149 19 0 138-143 13 0 Below 138 8 0


wmm

mmmvwm mm#m^*>*y*»>™<&ifiiffifi$

mmmmwtemmmmm smmm:: l

Median = Attriti

= 79 on = 0.8%

12

Srhnnl ABH Av. Boatswain's Mate fAircraft Handling^ School Code 6527

Location Lakehurst Graduates: _4Ji5__ Drops: 1 Total: 456

Selectors

GCT+MECH+SP=156

SUMMED SCORES

Above 197 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 138-143 132-137 Below 132

TOTAL

6 14 18 36 50 75 73 62 62 40

9 7 4

100 DROPS i-

o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0




4 MglÜ ff 5p 75 50

mntommt® &""" : : #mmm t=-

r ■■■:"■"■■■■ czz

cz-

75 100

m

Ü3

=3

—~ ■BBSS«


School AC Air Controlman School Code 6509 Location Glynco , Graduates: _909_ Drops: 26 Total: 935

Selectors GCT+ARI=110

SUMMED SCORES

Above 139 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 Below 100

TOTAL

30 89

128 176 242

85 80 57 37 11

100 DROPS

0 1 1 4 5 2 3 2 7 1



Below Median

75 50 2. Above Median

75

-,,,-, ,.,;,,,„, iyi^iimXiiiiiiii&Vil

Median = 83 Attrition = 2.8%

13

School ADJ Av. Machinist's Mate ("Jet Engine) School Code 6501

Location Memphis Graduates: 3078 Drops: 0 Total: 3078

Selectors

GCT+MECH+SP=156

SUMMED 100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SCORES IUIAL URUPS r—■

Above 197 31 0 192-197 83 0 186-191 191 0 180-185 325 0 174-179 423 0 168-173 494 0 162-167 523 0 156-161 476 0 150-155 354 0 144-149 144 o Below 144 34 0


C c :..:::.:.::-SSJU

t :. 1

(n-am. 1 1

EW&Ä 1

ISSS« «ESJfSffllp [iMUMMm^

Eiiv Mmmmmmm


School ADR Av. Machinist's Mate (Reciprocating) School Code 6502 Location Memphis , Graduates: 1325 Drops: 0 Total: 1325



SUMMED SCORES

Above 197 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 Below 144

TOTAL

13 38 78

116 185 214 213 221 171

63 13

DROPS

o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Below Median

100 75 50 25 M Above Median

)N 25 50 75 100 ^^»

1 t . . ,

pm . i

t............ ... i

Vmm :::timmmii

1 i

= :;Mi:::;:Mia

wmmmmmmm 1

1



14

School AE Aviation Electrician 'S Mate School Code 6515

Location Jacksonville Graduates: 3740 Drops: 360 Total: 4100


SUMMED 100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SLURhS 101 AL DROPS r—

Above 203 26 0 198-203 53 0 192-197 145 1 186-191 273 0 180-185 372 6 174-179 523 26 168-173 659 56 162-167 721 69 156-161 682 83 150-155 436 80 144-149 173 33 Below 144 37 6


immm&mvmxttxwtt ■ . ■ wy-m::xm$rt

GZ3 r~i

L~__^ T:'..'...

fc" ' wmm \

Median - 74

Attrition =8.8%

School AG Aerographer's Mate Location Lakehurst

School Code 6520 Graduates: _J2L_ Drops: 3 Total: 476

Selectors

GCT+ARI=110

SUMMED SCORES

Above 139 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 Below 105

TOTAL

18 40 74 77 67 73 80 30 17

100 DROPS r

0 o 0 1 0 1 1 0 0


Above Median 2^5 5p 75

Below Median 75 50 25

f xx»m;mtf {::;:::::;:::;:::::::;:;::.:::: ::.:::::: mmim tm

■.-.-.-.■.■:■;■;■: ;■:■ :■...; ■ .. ■; .■■ ■■ ;.. .-.■.■. «HSHS«»»»HJ«ä!a


Median = 76 Attrition = 0.63

15

School AK Aviation Storekeeper Location Memphis

School Code 6522 Graduates: 517 Drops: 0 Total: 517


SUMMED SCORES

Above 134 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99

Below 95

100 TOTAL DROPS •"



M^N y 5j) 75 50 25 -1-

14 21 58 52 79 80 124 65 30 14

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

c~

r

_

i.i.i.i.i.i.l.l.l.n;p.;.;,;.;.

75 100

mm m

—i



School AME Av. Structural Mechanic fSafety Equip,1 School Code 6516 Location Memphis Graduates: _7_6JL_ Drops: 0 Total: 769



Below Median Above Median SUMMED SCORES

Above 191 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 Below 144

TOTAL DROPS

30 33 61 98

138 124 135

88 49 15

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

100 75 50 25 M )N 25 50 75 100 rm

11

/ ^^1

1 i

m i

mm i

i

|""'"-

mm:! i

1 ;':':i'ivi:i:i"i:':''i;



16

School AMH Av. Structural Mechanic fHydraulics") School Code 6517 Location Memphis Graduates: 1645 Drops: __0_ Total: 1645


SUMMED SCORES

Above 197 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 Below 144

100 TOTAL DROPS *~

19 30 95 137 227 270 263 294 205 89 16

0 0 0 (1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0



Below Median Above Median 2^ M^N y 5j)

t'ÄüHf« ;'':■;;:;

wwmmwwwiwwm xmmmzwmim vmm~ mmm'-^ A


School AMS Av. Structural Mechanic fStructures! School Code 6518 Location Memphis Graduates: 1710 Drops: 0 Totol: 1710


SUMMED SCORES

Above 197 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 Below 144

TOTAL 30 65

115 174 230 287 256 259 182 88 24

100 DROPS l"

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


75 T"



¥ V £ 50 25 -r-

MDN

I.;; ".-


100 —■»

.,-:;:::;-™::.-: :>x->:,-.-.-:", - ,-::, --:>x::-yX:;,■ ::>>x ,

few. ."! .,;

MM'M WiWWWS . . :■;::. .f

lW:W:W:WwW:W

TTJ

•:-.■■'■.----:•:■:-:•'•-.-■■■. :■:■: :;Xwl

|r ..Tf.iiiiMii

17

School AO Aviation Qrdnanceman Location Jacksonville

School Code_6506__ Graduates: 2558 Drops: 69 Total: 2627



SUMMED SCORES

Above 197 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 Below 144

TOTAL 39 70

161 237 322 443 480 421 309 126 19

100 Below Median

75 50 25 Above Median

MDN 25 50 75 100 DROPS ■ ■ »

0 1 ~3 o i

o E"'""

2 i ■■ ■■ :«:>¥>1

3 £"***

3 pfe 1

10 imm ,,,.,:i

14 mmmm 27 [''"' mm

8 mmjmxsm

2


Median = 75 Attrition < 2.6%

School AQ Aviation Fire Control Technician Location Memphis Graduates: 1095

School Code 6535 Drops: 1 Total: 1096

Selectors ARI+2ETST=171

SUMMED SCORES

Above 218 213-218 207-212 201-206 195-200 189-194 183-188 177-182 171-176 165-170 Below 165

TOTAL 15 56 73

141 206 196 149 118 101

31 10

100 DROPS

o 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

75


Below Median Above Median 25 MDN y 5J) 75 50

T 100


Median = 78 Attrition 0.1%

18

School ASE Aviation Support Equipment Technician School Code 6530 Location Memphis _ Graduates: _J>2L_ Drops: __P___ Total: 521

Selectors GCT+MECH +SP=156

SUMMED SCORES TOTAL

Above 209 5 204-209 9 198-203 22 192-197 67 186-191 80 180-185 96 174-179 85 168-173 61 162-167 41 156-161 20 150-155 19 144-149 11 Below 144 5

100 r DROPS

o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Validity of Selectors = .29 Corrected Validity of Selectors =



75 50 25 Mlj>N ft 50 75 100

mmmam mm^mtm

mmm~ ma-mi

36 Median = 80 Attrition = 0.0%

School ATN Av. Electronics Technician fNavigationl School Code Locotion Memphis firnduntes: 863 Drops: 0 Total:

6503 863


SUMMED SCORES

Above 218 213-218 207-212 201-206 195-200 189-194 183-188 177-182 171-176 165-170 Below 165

TOTAL

27 53 95 134 153 153 105

61 48 22 12


100 DROPS

o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Below Median

75 50 25 M[ Above Median

4$ Jg. 75

Validity of Selectors = »55 Corrected Validity of Selectors = .67


19

School AV Avionics Fundamentals Location Memphis Graduates: 8446

School Drops: 0

Code 6531 Total: 8446




Above 218 213-218 207-212 201-206 195-200 189-194 183-188 177-182 171-176 165-170 159-164 Below 159

TOTAL 87

274 462 815

1097 1408 1325 1197 1088. 535 136 22

DROPS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

100 75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100

I f:SS l

[m-m mm \

m i

1 ■iizäL

® i

|y HI mms

1 i'fM :ixmwmm Ü :.';::::":".:::'-": ' 1

Validity of Selectors = .72 Corrected Validity of Selectors = ,84


School AVI Aviation Mechanics Fundamentals Location Memphis Graduates: 7152.

6532 School Code. Drops: 0 Total: 7152


SUMMED SCORES

Above 203 198-203 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 138-143 132-137 126-131 120-125 Below 120

Validit y of Selectors = .53 Corrected Validity of Selectors = .60



■# »■

Median == 81 Attrition

20

School AW Aviation Anti-Submarine Warfare Operator School Code— Locotion Memphis Graduates: 654 Drops: 0 Toto

6537 654



SUMMED SCORES

Above 218 213-218 207-212 201-206 195-200 189-194 183-188 177-182 171-176 165-170 Below 165

100 TOTAL DROPS r

Below Median

75 50 Above Median

75

6 23 48 77

119 145 110 57 49 16 4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



School AZ Aviation Maintenance Administrationman School Code 6528 Location Memphis Graduates: 579 Drops: 0 Total: 579



SUMMED SCORES

Above 134 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 Below 100

TOTAL

25 32 47 72 83 88

118 84 30

100 DROPS l"

o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Below Median 75 50 i MDN

Above Median 75 100 * V-

........................... ....-...-..^..


Median =80 Attrition 0.0%

21

School BT Boilerman Location Great Lakes

School Cod* 6069 r.mHl'"*-«- 34° Drnps: 0 Total: 340

Selectors

GCT+MECH+SP=156

SUMMED 100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SCORES IUIAL DROPS »"—

Above 197 2 0 192-197 9 0 186-191 11 0 180-185 30 0 174-179 58 0 168-173 70 0 162-167 59 0 156-161 54 0 150-155 31 0 144-149 7 0 Below 144 9 0


q HE mm®

1:7- ■•:• :!-.»l

ma 1

l:-::::: ■:-w-.::«3 1

f'KvSH m mm ...:.:,- I


22

School BU Builder 1 orntion Davisville .Graduates: 147 Drops:

School Code 6150 0 Total: 147

Selectors

GCT+MECH+SP=150

SUMMED SCORES

Above 197 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 138-143 132-137 Below 132

TOTAL

3 4 7

12 11 23 22 16 18 11 12

4 4

100 DROPS r

o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Below Median Above Median 75 50 2^ MDN ff 5fl _75_



School BU Builder Locntion Port Hueneme .Graduates: L12 Drops

School Code 6081 0 Total: 142


SUMMED SCORES

Above 191 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 138-143 132-137 126-131 Below 126

100 TOTAL DROPS r


Below Median Above Median 75 50 2^ MDN ^5 5J) 75 100

6 14 15 11 20 20 13 10 12

9 3 3 6

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Median = 83 Attrition = 0.0°

23

School CE Construction Electrician Location Davisville Graduates: 103

School Code__6l48___ Drops: 0 Total: 103



SUMMED SCORES

Above 197 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 Below 144

100 TOTAL DROPS «"

Below Median

75 50 25 MDN T

5 4 8

18 13 14 13 10

7 6 5

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ID! Above Median

75 * »

100

EZZ -^—~ M^M i ,

Validity of Selectors = .39 Corrected Validity of Selectors = 43


School CE Construction Electrician Location Port Hueneme Graduates: _2£8_

School Code_6079__

Drops: Q__ Total: 788

Selectors

GCT+MECH+SP=156

SUMMED SCORES

Above 197 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 138-143 132-137 Below 132

100 TOTAL DROPS ■"


Above Median MDN ^5 5p 75 100

Below Median

75 50 25 T

2 20 17 46 38 48 39 39 23

8 1 4 3

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

—] EZ~ :; ;.- ; ,. ./■ ^j

TO^: . '.... -mm wmm

mmmsmm mmmmm -Qamm r—

M^^^

Validity of Selectors = .46 Corrected Validity of Selectors= .53

z£z: i


24

School CS Commissaryman Locotion Newport

School Cod» 6124 Graduates: 34» Drops: 1 Total: 341


SUMMED SCORES

Above 134 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99 90-94

Below 90



25 MpN y 5p



School CS Commissaryman School Code_6125 Location San Diego Graduates:_§92__ Drops:_P__ Total: 892


SUMMED SCORES

Above 139 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99 90-94 85-89 80-84 75-79

Below 75


75



25 MflN 7^5 5j) 75 50

4 10 18 35 58 73

137 149 168 151 41 21

9 11

7

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

■ . ■ .

czz


100

■-/.................................~~~TT7 ,,,,,,,......■■■..■■■

zm

Median =83 Attrition = 0.0%

25

School CTA Communications Technician "A" Branch School Code Location Pensacola Graduates: 235 Drops: 1 Total

6020 236

Selectors

GCT+CLER= 110

SUMMED SCORES T0TA

Above 139 8 135-139 11 130-134 26 125-129 4 5 120-124 56 115-119 41 110-114 34 105-109 10 Below 105 5

100


Above Median

)N y 5J) 75 100 Below Median

75 50 25

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

rz:

.-,■■■■■■■-■,■-■ f" "■'■'■'".'■Tr*!

nzz F~_

S3SSI ■ .;■...„, ...^i,, i.i i il

mj

izzri



School CTI Basic Communications Technician "I" Branch School Code 6100 Location Goodfellow AFB Graduates: 131—Drops: 0 Total: 131

Selectors GCT+ARI+CLER=155



Above 214 209-214 203-208 197-202 191-196 185-190 179-184 173-178 167-172 161-166 155-160 Below 155

TOTAL 2 6

13 14 21 21 25 13

7 4 3 2

DROPS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

100 75 50 25 M[ )N ¥ 50 75 100

t

^»

[■•;; ■ :v s ]

mm 11

H

ZU

wmwa

ISftH«


Median = 87 Attrition : 0.0%

26

Srhnnl CTO Basic Communications Technician "0" Branch School CnA* 6053 Location Pensacola Graduates: _1085_ Drops: 20 Total: 1105


SUMMED SCORES

Above 144 140-144 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99

Below 95

TOTAL

6 41 95 138 168 180 202 151

88 29

4 3

100 DROPS «"

0 1 1 0 1 3 1 7 4 2 0 Hi 0



25 MDN y 5J) 75 f

50

~™—

mmmmmm^m mmmmmmM mmm

75 100

mmmmkmmm^määm mmmmmmmmmmm

mSämmmmm

mm*W&. zmmmmm t« mmm

mmmmmmm mmm®


tm: mmmm $m s $ m%; mmw? m * \ ;»;::


School CTR Basic Communications Technician "R" Branch School Code 6054 Location Pensacola Graduates: 1749 Drops: 24 Totolr 1773



SUMMED SCORES

Above 144 140-144 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99

Below 95

TOTAL 2

89 150 226 279 277 273 244 139

66 21

7

100 DROPS l"

0 1 3 0 3 3 3 4 3 4 0 0

Below Median

75 50 ; Above Median

75 ■# *■

100

.;;..,;..;w„.;.,,...;.., ' mW^^ |Sf«?

m

I

mmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmm mmmm



27

School CTT Basic Communications

Location Pensacola

Technician "T" BranchSrhonl Code 6099

Graduates: 804 Drops: 5 Total: 809


SUMMED 100




Above 144 6 0 140-144 50 0 135-139 70 0 130-134 109 0 125-129 150 0 120-124 127 0 115-119 128 2 110-114 89 0 105-109 49 1

► 100-104 26 2 1* Below 100 5 0


H MM

I 1

[

t IfSH mmm

I ...... mmmi .1

IgSKps;:?: 1


Srhnnl CYN Communications Yeoman School Code 6105 Location Norfolk Graduates: 95Jj [ »rops: 3 Total: 959

Selectors GCT+CLER=105

SUMMED 100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SCORES IUIAL DRUPS r——

Above 144 5 0 140-144 17 0 135-139 36 0 130-134 50 0 125-129 80 0 120-124 121 1 115-119 159 0 110-114 148 0 105-109 160 1 100-104 152 1 f 95-99 26 0

Below 95 5 0

Validity of Selectors = '47

Corrected Validity of Selectors = .47

liilvEvS -•---,:-.- -! 1Ü!:-'''!-!-!-!•!!!.ir.-"■"■ ^!-•-:,,,,.,,-i:-:ivix*

L ■ ^»JMJi«:m^MI

tmm 1H1 m^rl,u,,,,,^ ,

t " mz^^mmmmx. ) *

WMM """1

Median = Attriti

82 on = 0.3%

28

School DC Damage Controlman Loention Philadelphia Graduates: 146

School C«A* 6120 Drops: 0 Total 146

GCT+MECH+SP=156

SUMMED SCORES TOTAL

Above 191 6 186-191 13 180-185 17 174-179 28 168-173 26 162-167 21 156-161 20 150-155 9 Below 150 6

DROPS



4 Mgti $ $.



School DC Damage Controlman Locotion Treasure Island Graduates:

School Code 721 Drops: 1 Tota

6119 I: 722

Selectors

GCT+MECH+SP=156

SUMMED SCORES

Above 197 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 Below 144

TOTAL

15 32 45 85 79

107 116 122 82 35

4

100 DROPS

0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Above Median

45 SL- Below Median

75 50 25 MDN 100



29

School DK Disbursing Clerk Location Newport Graduates: 205

School Code 6062 Drops: 11 Total 216


SUMMED SCORES

Above 139 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99

Below 95

100 TOTAL DROPS »"



V »- 75 50 25 -T"

MDN

8 15 11 18 21 22 26 27 55 28

5

0 0 0 1 1 2 3 2 1 0 1

75 100

7J

IZ3



School DK Disbursing Clerk

Location San Diego

School Cods 6061 Groduat»«" 221 _ Drops: 6 Total: 227


SUMMED SCORES TOTAL

Above 139 4 135-139 18 130-134 30 125-129 29 120-124 29 115-119 32 110-114 21 105-109 29 100-104 17 95-99 16

Below 95 2

Validity of Selectors = Corrected Validity of Si

100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 DkUHS r—

0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0

.32 jlectors= .36

mm t

i

l

» 1

l "■■'':?;™;s|

Median = Attriti

= 83 on = 2.6%

30

School DP Data Processing Technician Location Treasure Island Graduates: _1QJ-

School Code_£lZL Drops: 0 Total: 105

Selectors GCT+ARI = = 110

SUMMED SCORES TOT/

Above 134 3 130-134 7 125-129 18 120-124 16 115-119 16 110-114 25 105-109 13 Below 105 5

DROPS

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



4 MgtÜ Q 3L



School DT Dental Technician

Location San Diego School Code 6086

.Graduates:_1069_ Drops: L_ Total: 1072




Above 144 140-144 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99 90-94

Below 90

TOTAL

7 18 51 77

108 124 120 144 146 152 93 29

3

100 DROPS r

o o 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 r

i

Validity of Selectors = .53 Corrected Validity of Selectors = 57


31

School EM Electrician's Mate School Code 6070

Location Great Lakes nrnHimtP«;- 72_. D rops: 0 Total: 72


SUMMED 100

PERCENTAGE GF SCHOOL MARKS


75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SCORES IUIAL URUPS •"—

Above 191 5 0 186-191 6 0 180-185 14 0 174-179 11 0 168-173 17 0 162-167 10 0 156-161 4 0

....■...■-■•■■. • !

mm | mmm m ■■"."■" s^^&^-^T'si

Is m i

i \ ? :■::'":: i

• :-■:-:>'- !

150-lbb 6 0 1 Below 150 2 0


Median = Attriti

= 81 on = 0.0%

School EM Electrician's Mate

Location San Diego

School Code 6071

f^.mtoc- 1690 nrnps: 1 Tntnl: 1691


SUMMED 100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SCUkbS IUIAL URUPS •—"

Above 209 3 0 204-209 18 0 198-203 54 0 192-197 106 0 186-191 194 0 180-185 266 0 174-179 253 0 168-173 242 0 162-167 218 0 156-161 172 0 150-155 86 0 144-149 48 0 138-143 19 1 132-137 7 0 Below 132 5 0


■ « * 1

c -m

mm " wmm ! m ■ ,,-,:.:.,.-::: - . ,::::::::,j,

f mm -,"•"::.' ,mmm ,..,;..,!

i 1

r:m V:m,: ,,. . ..:\

"■•'1

1 '•::,,:::]

' - .! j

Median = Attritii

84 an = 0.1%

32

School EN Engineman Location Great Lakes Graduates: 301

School Code 6067 Drops: 0 Total 301


SUMMED SCORES

Above 209 204-209 198-203 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 Below 150

3 8

14 45 58 57 40 33 19 10 11

3



TOTAL DROPS * o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

)0 75 50 2.5 MDN 25 50 75 100

■ ® m {mi 1

mm ... 1

i mm •.:::::■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■....■■■■:-«-:i



33

School EO Equipment Operator

Location Davisville Hrndiintf»«;- 1,1,2.. D School Code 6159

roDs: 0 Total: 112

Selectors

GCT+MECH+SP=150

SUMMED 100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SLURbS 101 AL DROPS r-

Above 185 8 0 180-185 12 0 174-179 8 0 168-173 8 0 162-167 15 0 156-161 15 0

- 150-155 10 0 144-149 11 0

C

|x: 1 138-143 8 0 P 132-137 7 0 1

1 1

-- 81 on = 0.0%

Below 132 io o mm::.


Median = Attriti

School EO Equipment Operator

Location Port Hueneme

School Cod* 6097 r,r^„ntBc 409 Dmp*- 0 Tntnl: 409

Selectors

GCT+MECH+SP=150

SUMMED 100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SCORES 101 AL DROPS •—"" Above 197 7 0 192-197 14 0 186-191 19 0 180-185 39 0 174-179 46 0 168-173 50 0 162-167 34 0 156-161 39 0 150-155 41 0 144-149 28 0 138-143 35 0

11 i

EZ mmm

LSI-16/ 15 u t.,.,,;...,...,....,..,.,,............ ....,.,....,....,.., m 126-131 10 0 : J

120-125 7 0 1 - ■ ■: ':::'■

ii4-ny x o | '

108-113 6 0 I. ' ' ' : ."""""""". Below 108 3 0 1'"" Validity of Selectors = .61 Corrected Validity of Selectors = .64

Median = Attriti

84 on = 0.0%

34

School ET Electronics Technician fA-1) Locotion Great Lakes Graduates: 868

School Code 6129

Drops: 54 Total 922

Selectors

ARI+2ETST=171

SUMMED SCORES

Above 218 213-218 207-212 201-206 195-200 189-194 183-188 177-182 171-176 165-170 159-164 Below 159

100 TOTAL DROPS r

37 96

134 186 127 111 86 71 40 19

8 7



4 ugu $ $ 75 50 75 T—

100

0 2 3 3 9 7 9

10 9 2 0 0

Validity of Selectors = .63 Corrected Validity of Selectors

t i —i

I 1 1 mmmm ■^mmzmmmm-^mmm

= .73


School ET Electronic»«; TsrhniriaTi (A-1) Locotion Treasure Island Graduates:

School Code 6130 3173 Drops: 135 Total: 3308


SUMMED SCORES

Above 218 213-218 207-212 201-206 195-200 189-194 183-188 177-182 171-176 165-170 Below 165

TOTAL

102 312 403 556 598 514 366 243 156

41 17

100 DROPS r

0 0 o

'3 18 20 25 30 28 10

1



25 MDN y 5J)



35

School ET Electronics Technician fA-2") Locotion Great Lakes Graduates: 710



SUMMED SCORES

Above 218 213-218 207-212 201-206 195-200 189-194 183-188 177-182 171-176 Below 171




* *L 75 50 T

25 -r- MDN

29 1 90 2

112 7 177 16 113 6

93 5 75 5 41 5 19 2 11 1

c

HZ nzz

czz ['"""■: ■■■•■■■■ ■"■■■:' ■^

m tS«« ?V'«V■':::--:-- ••".«•..-, ,*, fefiOJ

r—.

75 100

—1



School ET Electronics Technician fA-21 School Code 6134 Location Treasure Island Grnduotes: 2794. Drops: 85 Total: 2879


SUMMED 100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SLURbS IUIAL ÜRUPS «"—

Above 218 111 0 213-218 317 0 207-212 385 1 201-206 516 6 195-200 519 22 189-194 445 18 183-188 293 18 177-182 166 8 171-176 89 7 165-170 28 4 Below 165 10 1


B j

rz cv!\j

f m^v^m wtm WM mm

feW:!:':^:!:!:-:^:':":': '

Median = Attriti

-- 79 on = 2.9%

36

School ET Electronics Technician fA-3") fCommunication")School Code 6137 Locotion Great Lakes Graduates: .412— Drops: 2 Total 421

Selectors

ARI+2ETST=171

SUMMED SCORES

Above 218 213-218 207-212 201-206 195-200 189-194 183-188 177-182 171-176 Below 171

TOTAL

10 47 69 90 83 63 31 16

6 6

100 DROPS r-

o 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1




mmMmmmmmmm

i '"':'.'-' . ..j

m i F '«« £:< ■i. i

I .... ■ :,-,,:SV,:A,-:: :: 1

1 m:smm^ m [:■:::- . Ml

tSKv -'■■:':-:. i

Median = 81 Attrition ■■ 0.5%

School ET Electronics Technician (A-3) ("Communication") School Code 6138 Location Treasure Island Graduates: _JJÜ£_ Drops: 5 Total: 1471


SUMMED SCORES

Above 218 213-218 207-212 201-206 195-200 189-194 183-188 177-182 171-176 165-170 Below 165

66 183 212 251 254 215 150

70 37 16 17


100 TOTAL DROPS r

Below Median

75 50 25

Above Median

75 100

0 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0


Median = 80 Attrition =0.3?

37

School ET Electronics Technician (A-3) (Radar) Location Great Lakes Graduates: JLUL



SUMMED SCORES

Above 218 213-218 207-212 201-206 195-200 189-194 183-188 177-182 171-176 Below 171



Below Median Above Median 75 50 25 MDN ft 5p 75

14 58 62

119 56 49 38 15

8 6

0 2 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0

100

mm* wmmmm

m \ l

1 m : i 1

wmmm i

Validity of Selectors = .45 Corrected Validity of Selectors ,57


School ET Electronics Technician fA-31 fRadarl School Code 6136 Location Treasure Island Rrmtnnt»«- 1271 Drnp*- 1 Total: 1272

Selectors

ARI+2ETST=171

SUMMED 100




Above 218 33 0 213-218 136 0 207-212 177 0 201-206 249 0 195-200 226 1 189-194 190 0 183-188 137 0 177-182 58 0 171-176 40 0 165-170 12 0 Below 165 14 0

Validity of Selectors = -42 Corrected Validity of Selectors = .54

:'S:Sj

IS

E ■ , iiJ \M 1

issssss

[K;

[

Median = Attriti

= 81 on = 0.1%

38

School FT Fire Control Technician (Phase I) School Code 6026 Locotion Bainbridge Graduates: _1S2__ Drops: 8 Total: 197

Selectors ARI+2ETST= = 171

SUMMED SCORES T OTA

Above 218 2 213-218 8 207-212 17 201-206 29 195-200 28 189-194 29 183-188 23 177-182 29 171-176 22 165-170 7 Below 165 3

100 DROPS ■"

0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 3 0 1

T


Above Median MD_N y 5fl 75 100


T

EH1 d

mz

i

n



School FT Fire Control Technician (Phase I) School Code 6027 Locotion Great Lakes Graduates: _28_1_ Drops: _P___ Total: 281

Selectors ARI+2ETST= =171

SUMMED SCORES T OTA

Above 212 9 207-212 12 201-206 24 195-200 51 189-194 45 183-188 50 177-182 39 171-176 38 165-170 11 Below 165 2

DROPS

o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0




*—5d

l :■■•. ■■■ ■' '■ ,, tV,',,,!',',-,' i' "-■T. .V.; ■.••■■■ <

„_ 1

.:. i

mmm I--: :■;.:-. ■


39

School FT Fire Control Technician (Phase II) Location Great Lakes Graduates: 201 D

School Code 6108 roos: 0 Total: 201


SUMMED 100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SCORES 101 AL ÜRUHS •—"

Above 206 6 0 201-206 9 0 195-200 21 0 189-194 52 0 183-188 45 0 177-182 28 0 171-176 29 0

v!x?l

mmm IS: •:*:-:• m>&:Um*mm<mmmMmmi

J 1 :>::::::...-. . i

1

mmmmmm^n 1 tl.l- 1 /ll / II F: : :: wm Below 165 4 0

Validity of Selectors = «41

Corrected Validity of Selectors = .56

p........ ■::':ö:l


40

Srhnol GM Gunner's Mate (Phase I) School Cod» 6115 Location Great Lakes Graduates: 304 Drops: 0 Total: 304

Selectors

GCT+MECH+SP=163

SUMMED SCORES

Above 204 199-204 193-198 187-192 181-186 175-180 169-174 163-168 157-162 151-156 145-150 139-144 Below 139

100 TOTAL DROPS r



75 50 ,25 MDN ff 5J) 75

3 13 15 27 40 48 64 47 28 11

3 3 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Validity of Selectors = .44 Corrected Validity of Selectors = -53

Median - 79 Attrition = 0.0%

School GM Gunner's Mate fGunsl fPhase III Location Great Lakes Graduates:

School Code 6117 93 Drops: 0 Total: 93

Selectors

GCT+MECH+SP=163

SUMMED SCORES

Above 198 193-198 187-192 181-186 175-180 169-174 163-168 157-162 Below 157

100 TOTAL DROPS r



-45 «.

7 7

14 14 14 16 10

6 5

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



41

School GMT Gunner's Mate Technician ("Class PI Lnrntion Great Lakes . Graduates: _9_L



SUMMED SCORES

Above 197 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 Below 144

TOTAL

4 4

12 9

12 13 18

9 5 3

100 DROPS «~


Above Median

jm # ^- Below Median

75 50 25 T

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ESUH

p^T-—"

t—r^r>? t

c

E lY 1111111111111111

75 100



School GMT Gunner's Mate Techni iiian TPhase III School Code 6025 Location Sandia Base Gm<Was: 271, Drops: 13 Total: 284

Selectors

GCT+MECH+SP=156

SUMMED 100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SCORES IUIAL ÜRUHS I-

Above 197 15 0 192-197 11 0 186-191 31 0 180-185 30 0 174-179 40 2 168-173 56 4 162-167 43 1 156-161 30 3 150-155 20 3 Below 150 8 0


m i :mm:mm'<mm:m^mmmm

i a - m& ■ m i

i »■■j>»:ife' .i

i!fc

I.: .1 mm ' s: i^mmmm. i

,,,..,,,..... !

wmmmmwmmm 1

i mmi

Median = Attriti

-- 86 on = 4.6%

42

School HM Hospital Corpsman Locotion Great Lakes

School Cod« 6084 .Graduates:_560_I> Drops: 490 Totnl: 6091


SUMMED SCORES

Above 144 140-144 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99 90-94 85-89 80-84

Below 80

TOTAL

8 120 275 422 550 634 766 866 898 823 552 147

18 6 6

100 DROPS r

ü 0 l l 6

12 29 61 87 127 122 35

3 3 3



T- 50 4 75 100



School HM Hospital Corpsman Location San Diego

School Code 6085 .Graduates:_5508_ Drop«;: 0 Tntnl: 5508


SUMMED SCORES

Above 144 140-144 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99 90-94 85-89

Below 85




4 m ^ 3L 75 50 75

6 90

226 376 475 561 671 788 790 793 597 121

8 6

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

w. ^■■■■/■■■■■■■■::---.. !

mmm

""^"■■■"■"■'!:!. ;: j

yy^^m-;: mm



43

Seh 001 IC Interior Communications Electrician 115 Location Great Lakes Graduates:

School Code Drops: 0 Tota

6072 I: 115


SUMMED SCORES

Above 197 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 Below 150

TOTAL

5 13 13 16 IS

9 22 14

5 3



100 75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 DROPS ' '

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



School Cods 6073 Scn00| IC Interior Communications Electrician

I ni-ntion San Diego Graduates: 9_ZJL_ Drops: H Total: 986


SUMMED SCORES

Above 209 204-209 198-203 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 138-143 Below 138




tf »- 75 50 25 MDN 75

4 16 42 82

106 147 158 117 114 104

58 29

6 3

0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 1 2 0 2 0 0

lilOe; 1 :,,:....:.::..1


100 —^

,..::...:.: ; ,1

I.:;:;...:.l


44

School MM Machinist's Mate Locotion Great Lakes Graduates:

School Cad» 6066 389 Drops: . __0 Total: 389


SUMMED SCORES

Above 203 198-203 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 Below 144

TOTAL DROPS

8 22 36 56 67 55 47 49 27 17

3 2

100 r-

o o o o o o o o o o o o

Validity of Selectors =.44 Corrected Validity of Selectors =

75



50 -T"

25 -T-

ÜDN. 75 100 mmm9

M% mmmmmmmmmmmmmsM

H

EZ M 8^™»i«m iiiii

*'**' ••■•■'••• •■^••-

WT—

miiwmmmmm mmmmm

,52 Median = 83 Attrition = 0.0%

School _MJ Location

Mineman Charleston

School Cod« 6041 Graduates: 153 Drops: 10 Total: 163


SUMMED SCORES

Above 197 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 Below 144

TOTAL 4 3

14 14 17 23 30 32 19

5 2

100 DROPS *•

o 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 3 m l




75

,47

50 *

MDN

l ~

75

^■■»-■;r*:;K:~;l:m!.:;\

„„.,v,-,V■-,:■:*; i m^


100

45

School MR Machinery Repairman School Code 6068

Locotion San Diego Graduates: 290 Drops: 0 Total: 290

Selectors

GCT+MECH+SP=156

SUMMED 100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SCORES 101 AL DROPS <"—

Above 203 6 0 198-203 14 0 192-197 17 0 186-191 31 0 180-185 40 0 174-179 37 0 168-173 44 0 162-167 29 0 156-161 43 0 150-155 16 0 144-149 11 0

ES&B8 J

k ■ i

i . m [':'«:«•':■

mmmmammttm: ■WiWM """1

i 1

i wmmwmmmm I"'- .:. . ■ mm

mmi he low 144 / ii vmmt



School PC Postal Clerk

Location San Diego Graduatts: 192 D School Code 6089

ops: 7 Total: 199


SUMMED 100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 10"/ SCORES IUIAL DROPS «"-—

Above 129 5 0 125-129 4 0 120-124 12 0 115-119 17 0 110-114 26 0 105-109 40 3 100-104 39 3 95-99 40 1 90-94 13 0

! l I

1 : 1 «a

■' i ■ m m is ■ ,. ,i..tm f

'*f;i

= 85 on = 3.5%

Below yu 6 0 t :.-:'•


Median = Attriti

46

School PE Polaris Electronics Locotion Dam Neck

School Code 6146 Graduates: 1519 Drops: 523 Tote 2042


SUMMED SCORES

Above 218 213-218 207-212 201-206 195-200 189-194 183-188 177-182 171-176 165-170 159-164 Below 159

TOTAL 33 67

125 220 316 341 336 251 234

80 17 22

DROPS 0 1 l

10 37 63

115 114 114

56 8 4

100


Below Median Above Median 75 50

* 75 T-

100

^^m. C

I • '-i

1

VM:r..:■;.■■ :■'■:':

:.::<m i !

1

J

I


Median = 76 Attrition •• 25.63

School PH Photographer's Mate Location Pensacola Graduates: 455


Selectors

GCT+ARI= = 105

SUMMED SCORES TOTAL DRO

Above 139 9 0 135-139 31 0 130-134 35 0 125-129 45 3 120-124 40 1 115-119 77 6 110-114 65 3 105-109 95 7 100-104 67 11 95-99 21 2

Below 95 4 1


Below Median Above Median 100 75 50 25 M )N 25 50 75 100

T^ ^^r

1 Si

t. ■:■;■:

| i>M^wmWMM^MMM!&m»w£



47

School PN Personnelman School Cade 6101

Location Bainbridge CrnHnntR«;- 94 D rops: 0 Total: 94

Selectors

GCT+ARI=110

SUMMED 100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SCORES IUIAL DROPS l-

Above 139 4 0 135-139 13 0 130-134 14 0 125-129 16 0 120-124 14 0 115-119 11 0 110-114 8 0 105-109 9 0

:-:::■..--::■■.:-■,•,::.::::: ...:i:-:.-::- 1

: ...J mmim,,m^,mM::;;; „.SKI

mt^mimmmi [sSSffi! ^mm

-- 83 on = 0.0%

Below 10 S S 0 !"'"""'


Median = Attriti

School PN Personnelman School COHP 6031

Location Orlando GrnHnntfiR- 445 D roos: 0 Total: 445

Selectors

GCT+ARI=110

SUMMED 100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SCORES IUIAL ÜRUPS ■"—

Above 139 15 0 135-139 21 Ö 130-134 34 0 125-129 49 0 120-124 70 0 115-119 73 0 110-114 82 0 105-109 47 0 100-104 39 0 95-99 9 0

Below 95 6 0


I i I

■f~--. « :,... i

i i

mm:wmmm \ m mämi I... :/: ■ m

>.:•■. !

fss ::sm |;s < ... .,::. ...si

Median = Attriti

= 85 on = 0.0%

48

PN Personnelman School Location San Diego

School Code 6102 .Graduates: _Z63__ Drops: __2p_ Total: 785


SUMMED SCORES

Above 139 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99 90-94

Below 90

100 TOTAL DROPS r

30 55 70 83

102 140 111

72 69 27 13 11


Above Median y 50 75

Below Median

75 50 25 100

0 0 0 0 1 3 6 5 2 0 1 2



School PR Aircrew Survival Equipmentman Locution Lakehurst Graduates: JÜ2-

School Code Drops: 6 Tota

6519 548


SUMMED SCORES

Above 197 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 Below 144

TOTAL

8 14 25 54 61 92 93 87 74 29 11

100 DROPS r"

0 0 o o o 2 o l 3 0 0



Below Median Above Median 75 50

T $ m $ 5fi 75 100

... .......... El

|

WffiSSWS . i

i

8Sf«E??;.iifflfgaS3

|.:o:.:v:-:-:-:-:v:v:v:-:v:v:-:-:v;:-:::-:::o^:-V':-:::;:::;::::::::::::::V::::

Median =77 Attrition =1.1%

49

School PT Air Intelligence Airman School Code 6529

Location Lowrv AFB Graduates: A1A Drops: 12 Total: 186


SUMMED SCORES TOTAL

Above 139 6 135-139 9 130-134 13 125-129 17 120-124 25 115-119 29 110-114 41 105-109 28 100-104 14 Below 100 4

Validity of Selectors = Corrected Validity of S

100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 DROPS r—

0 0 0 0 1 0 3 5 2 1

.59 jlectors = . 66

■ ■ ■:■ ■■

r '"*]

i

MM, f"" .::i

:::<«::,::-:>,:::.«J:W:::M::::?»:1

1

1

t''" ■Mini t


50

School C'M Quartermaster Location Newport .Graduates: 80ft

School Code Drops: 62 Total

6001 871


SUMMED SCORES

Above 144 140-144 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99 90-94

Below 90

TOTAL

3 17 32 66 105 122 152 154 121 49 35 13

2

100 DROPS

o l 0 2 0 6 5

18 18

6 5 1 0





School QM Quartermaster 6002

Location San Diego . Graduates: 112. School Code.

Drops: 0 Total: 112


SUMMED SCORES

Above 144 140-144 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99 90-94

Below 90

100 TOTAL DROPS r



$ tfgtl Q $.

3 2 3 6

10 14 19 20 14

5 8 5 3

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


p—-———*' '■ ".■• 1

fete 1

mm" ' 1

vmm~«iimmmmmi<::,... smmima mmm

fe>¥: . ' ::■■■••■■",

58 Attrition =0.0%

51

School RM Radioman (A-l) School Code 6144

Location San Diego Graduates: 5061 Drops: 0 Total: 5061


SUMMED SCORES

Above 139 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99

Below 95

TOTAL 122 251 395 560 667 768 770 677 506 287 58

100 DROPS «"

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



75 50 25 MDN ^5 5p 75 100

1

1

H m ..,':"■"."'":""""": i

EZ smssi

13

m t™ «-si

! . ? i ■msmim

(KSKSSKS:' ,,,!


Median = 87 Attrition : 0.0%

School RD Radarman School Cod« 6141

Location Treasure ] [sland Graduates: J^i£_ Drops: 123 Total: 1641


SUMMED SCORES TOTAL

Above 139 49 135-139 98 130-134 148 125-129 219 120-124 281 115-119 324 110-114 296 105-109 170 100-104 49 Below 100 7

Validity of Selectors = Corrected Validity of Si

100



75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 DROPS ■""

0 0 2 5

11 24 38 33 10 0

.51 älectors = .59

L

■ V f m^m^

1

1 Ü

mmzs;<:w;mm®ä mmm

mmmmm (jH

Median = Attriti

-- 78 on = 7.5%

52

■ •»*■.■>•.

SD Steward School Location_San_Diego_ .Graduates: 2838



SUMMED SCORES

Above 134 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99 90-94 85-89 80-84 75-79 70-74 65-69

Below 65

TOTAL



75 50 2^ MDN ff 5J) 75


School SF Shipfitter School Code 6106 Locotion San Diego Graduates: -LfiL- Drops: _0_ Total: 1457

Selectors

GCT+MECH+SP=156

SUMMED 100 SCORES TOTAL DROPS «~


Below Median 7,5 9 V

Above Median )N y 50 75

Above 203 198-203 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 138-143 Below 138

4 18 43 87

157 206 250 244 226 141

67 8 6

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

100

m ;■■"■■■■'■■■■-:.■:,■-.-■ ■■■;■■".>■.;'■.,-;,:.' :

Validity of Selectors = .34 I Corrected Validity of Selectors = .41

1 .j

m ——i

I HI-..*


53

School SK Storekeeper

Location.

School Code 6060 Newport . Graduates: _i£iL_ Drops: _57_ Total: _i£52_


SUMMED SCORES

Above 144 140-144 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99 90-94 85-89 80-84

Below 80

TOTAL

6 32 50 73

100 129 139 190 164 112 36 13

3 3 2

100 DROPS r-

0 o o i 0 2 5 8

20 16

0 4 1 0 0



_y 5J 75, 75 50 4- 100

—— ' 1

immmWMmiiiMmmm:mmm w^mmmmmmmmmmmmmm

&:$.L • - -



School SK Storekeeper School Code 6059 Lorntion San Diego . Graduates: _1189_ Drops: _^L_ Total: 1419


SUMMED SCORES

Above 144 140-144 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99 90-94 85-89

Below 85




-MfiN. # 5J) 75 75 50 4- 3

39 70

124 151 185 198 226 204 143

59 9 5 3

0 0 0 0 1 0 4 4 7 6 5 0 1 2

r~7

.

100

SSW* '.'■'■■■•>.'.•■ iiiiii Säur

"¥":;;;;:"■";:■';;:" r— -^—~!™1 — -— I

1 «■■ft* *** *:-*SJ

: czzzzizzzzzz L.\jam

!*»■" 'i

Validity of Selectors = .49 Corrected Validity of Selectors

——-

n

54 Median = 82 Attrition =2.1%

54

School SM Signalman Location Newport

School Cod« 6005 M..n..c 882 n^pc- 44 Totnl: 926


SUMMED SCORES TOTAL 1

Above 144 5 140-144 24 135-139 32 130-134 70 125-129 96 120-124 132 115-119 210 110-114 171 105-109 109 100-104 49 95-99 15 90-94 10

Below 90 3

Validity of Selectors = Corrected Validity of Se

100


Below Median Above Median 75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100

JRUPS r— 0 0 0 1 3 6

11 6 9 5 1 2 0

>

.28 ectors = .31

ss mm . mm EZ i

:■-.,■ 1

mm ■■■—■■■-■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ |

mmmm:mmmmimm 1

i 1

mmm ;•: 1 mmm^mm ;:i

t?; ,,.,.... ^mmmm ! IS« : 1

f ;..-.:,. mm mi . I

:?#<■: m

mm l

Median =90 Attrition =4.8%

School SM Signalman Location San Diego

fBasic) ftrndimtpc- _89 Di

School Cade 6006 ops: 1 Total: 90

Selectors

GCT+CLER=110

SUMMED SCORES TOTAL C

Above 134 4 130-134 10 125-129 6 120-124 12 115-119 11 110-114 17 105-109 12 100-104 14 Below 100 4

Validity of Selectors = 1 Corrected Validity of Se

100


Below Median Above Median 75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100

IRUHS r '

0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

.11 ectors = . 14

mmmmmtmmmmm$mmmim mzmm m,', ::,l

1 1

1: : ' ■ "1

mm ',»? * 1

1.. ■ Z:.:-.: : M

i. mmm .„„:..,,,,„„;;; :" i |sr " '■'■ m w: ' l

1 1

Median = Attriti

79 on = 1.1%

55

School Sonar Technician fSurface) (A-l) School Code 6015

I nmtion San Diego ftrn(4nnt«sr 618 Drops: 1 Total: 619

Selectors PERCENTAGE OF SCHOOL MARKS

GCT+ARI = 110 Be|ow Medjan Above Medjan

SUMMED 100 75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SCORES IUIAL URUPS I ■ ■ ■

Above 139 26 0 11 135-139 53 o mm 130-134 8b 0 1""'" „„ I 12S-129 109 0 t ' i

120-124 98 0 mWW- ■m

115-119 108 0 1 mm 110-114 82 0 1 •"■'"■ i 105-109 37 0 b::.................. ,,,.........„, „. 1 100-104 15 1 1 m Below 100 5 0 1 i

.,,.,. , e i A ■• Median = 78 Valid.ty of Selectors = .41 Attrition = 0.2% Corrected Validity of Selectors = .49

School ST Sonar Technician fA-2") School Code 6160 Location San Diego Graduates: _4JU— D roDs: 0 Total: 401

Selectors PERCENTAGE OF SCHOOL MARKS GCT+ARI=110


SUMMED 100 75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SCURbS IUIAL URUPS I ■ ■ ■

Above 139 13 0 H 135-139 38 0 1Ü 130-134 76 o wmmm mmm 125-129 78 0 1 SSSS'ii

120-124 72 o wm®zwmm& 115-119 56 0 t :■:;:,. mmmmm

■ > 110-114 45 0 f mm I 105-109 IS 0 1 .......... mm Below 105 8 0 iir^ ''' ' ' ::"" !

if i. i. r r i -„ Median = Validity of Selectors = .50 Attriti Corrected Validity of Selectors = .59

= 81 on = 0.0%

56

School STS Sonar Technician (Submarine! Locotion San Diego Graduates: _10£


Selectors

GCT+ARI= 110

SUMMED SCORES TOT/

Above 139 2 135-139 11 130-134 23 125-129 16 120-124 13 115-119 15 110-114 16 105-109 4 Below 105 4

100 DROPS f~

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Above Median Below Median 75 50 25

T r

B E1

ES

75 100 —»

-""" 1

=3



School TD Tradevman

Locotion Memphis

School Cod«. 6521 Graduates: __322_ Drops: 0 Total: 322


SUMMED SCORES

Above 218 213-218 207-212 201-206 195-200 189-194 183-188 177-182 171-176 Below 171

100 TOTAL DROPS r



-$ Mgti V 3L

16 57 46 41 39 36 36 20 20 11

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



57

School TM Torpedoman's Mate Loention Key West Graduates: 190 Drops

School Code_602j___ 0 Total: 190

Selectors

GCT+ARI=110

SUMMED SCORES

Above 139 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 Below 105

TOTAL

5 6 7

17 31 39 37 36 12

100 DROPS i"

ü 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0




# «- 75 50 25 -r- MDN 75 100 —n

*!W1

,::-:,:- :::::-:■•.-.-:--:-: ... .1

t- '":::::.:. I

1' :;«:«¥::-:■:■'■ "-'I

t

(,. ■:■:■:•:■:■:■■■:■■- ■:■:■:■:■:■:■:■:■;■;■; ::■;■;-; YiviYivivfl


School TM Torpedoman's Mate

Locotion Key West

School Code__6023__ firnrlnntp«;- 165 Drops: 0 Total: 165


SUMMED SCORES

Above 139 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 Below 105

TOTAL

5 10 10 27 28 34 30 14

7

100 DROPS i"

o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


75


Below Median Above Median -MDtJ ff 5fl 50

T 25

»^ mz

75

Median = 84 Attrition •■ 0.0%

100

58

School TM Torpedoman's Mate (Basic) Locotion Orlando Graduates: J1A.

School Code Drops: 0 Total

6169 94


SUMMED SCORES

Above 134 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 Below 110

100 TOTAL DROPS '


Below Median Above Median 75 50 2^ MDN ff 5fl 75 100

8 13 14 17 19 18

5

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 mm\

1 f: ::::,::.,:.:....::...::...:!

J

„.,.,„:.)



School TM Torpedoman's Mate School Cods 6022 Locotion San Diego Graduates: __156_ Drops: 0 Total: 156


SUMMED SCORES

Above 139 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 Below 100

TOTAL

3 9 8

19 21 28 38 20

5 5

100 DROPS r~

0 o 0 o o o o o o o



S «L 75 50 *

MDN

::::->;■;:■:■■:... ,...■■ TTJ

75 100

wmmmm ■■: ■ - -■:■■:■■■:,■.

- i

M»^^^^z: in



59

School TM Torpedoman

Location Orlando

's Mate (Submarine) ftrndiintp<;r 12,1. D

School Code 6034 rops: 0 Total: 123


SUMMED SCORES TOTAL D

Above 139 3 135-139 5 130-134 13 125-129 16 120-124 15 115-119 25 110-114 32 105-109 11 Below 105 3

Validity of Selectors = Corrected Validity of Sei



100 75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 RUPS i • ■ ■ ■ " ^^ ^^

() |::: :v

o mm u i mrn^M Q (1 SilES :Ä::Sa

l) ImM .1

ii f. :: wmmr ■■,:•■-i

0

. „ Median = 87 ,, Attrition = 0.0% ectors = .1/

School ™ Torpedoman's Mate (Submarine) Location San Diego Graduates: 164 D

School Code 6024 rops: 0 Total: 164

Selectors PERCENTAGE OF SCHOOL MARKS GCT+ARI=110

Below Median Above Median SUMMED 100 75 50 25 MDN 25 50 75 100 SLUKLS IUIAL UKUPb ■ ■ » » ■ » ^^^

Ahnvp 1.44 U 1) »""""

130.1:44 10 0 1 :,:•:->: ;.:ss;i

125-129 1/ 0 msmmsmmzmf i

120-124 31 0 !

I | S-l 19 ^S n 1' 1

ii(i_ii4 44 () ESSM™-1^' 1 105-ioQ ii n mmrm,,,,,,. ,

l()(l-104 4 0 i" :""" 1

Below 100 3 0

w 1 • i-. 1 c 1 , ~ Median = Validity ot Selectors = .12 Attriti Corrected Validity of Selectors = .16

mm

= 84 on = 0.0%

60

School TM Torpedoman's Mate (Surface) School Code 6036 Locotion Orlando Graduates: 114 , Drops: 0 Total: 114


SUMMED SCORES

Above 139 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 Below 100

100 TOTAL DROPS «"



2^ MDN y 5J) 75 -r 50

5 6 6

12 17 29 20 13

4 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

75 100

... ■ vr\

n Z3

__ -—1

iwrnm; wwrn^mm mm

Validity of Selectors = .39 Corrected Validity of Selectors .46

Median = 85 Attrition = 0.0?

School UT Utilitiesman Location Port Hueneme .Graduates: 14°

School Cods 6083 Drops: _2 Total: JiP_

Selectors

GCT+MECH+SP=150

SUMMED SCORES

Above 197 192-197 186-191 180-185 174-179 168-173 162-167 156-161 150-155 144-149 138-143 132-137 126-131 120-125 114-119 Below 114

100 TOTAL DROPS r



X—w 75 100

5 4 6 8 9

14 19

9 12 15 10 12

5 5 3 4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


:■: ,:■: ft-:*:-™-: :■« K™:-!™ .' V;:;.*,-.:.**- ■■.v<-:<i,:-+■■.


61

School YN Yeoman School Code 6058 Lnrntinn Bainbridge Graduates: _22^__ Drops: 1 Total: 293


SUMMED SCORES

Above 139 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99

Below 95

100 TOTAL DROPS i"


Above Median MDN y 5j) 75


2 7

20 37 53 64 56 40

9 3 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

<■■ ■

* 1 —

100

:■:•:•;•:■:■:-:-:-:•:■:■:•:•:•:■:■:

uE I fr.*:-.-.- ■.■:■:•:■:•:■:•■ Z3

i 1 i '

m .«



School YN Yeoman Location San Diego

School Code 6057 Graduates: 597 Drops: 2 Total: 599


SUMMED SCORES

Above 149 145-149 140-144 135-139 130-134 125-129 120-124 115-119 110-114 105-109 100-104 95-99 90-94 85-89

Below 85



Below Median Above Median 75 50 25 MDN ft 5j) 75 100

2 4

12 26 43 55 97 89

104 82 49 21

8 5 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

?.;.!■!■;■:.;■:■;.!■;.;.!■!.;.;??

■■■ ■■■■-:::■■■■■::■::■:■■:■:■■,■■:;■:■■■. . ,y. -.■::■:■>■.:.: ;■:■:■:■:■---:■:.,:■ i — -- ■ —

I ■Yi.. i ■ ■■ v.; ;.;■;-

-i

mp

mmm *—*T i

— ■.■■■■ ■-—■■"■"V"M; — ■■!

■__ __]

wmmmmmmm wmmmmmmm mmmmmm . u

r^~ —rrm I

I



62

INDEX

ABE

ABF

ABH

AC

ADJ

ADR

Ali

AG

AK

AME

AMH

AMS

AO

AQ

ASE

ATN

AV

AVI

AW

A2

BT

BU

BU

CE

CE

es

es

Rating

Av. Boatswain's Mate (Launching § Recovery)

Av. Boatswain's Mate (Fuels)

Av. Boatswain's Mate (Aircraft Handling)

Air Controlman Glynco

Av. Machinist's Mate (Jet Engine) Memphis

Av. Machinist's Mate (Reciprocating) Memphis

School Location

Lakehurs t

Lakehurst

Lakehurst

Aviation Electrician's Mate

Aerographer's Mate

Aviation Storekeeper

Av. Structural Mechanic (Safety

Jacksonville

Lakehurst

Memphis

Memphis Equipment)

Av. Structural Mechanic (Hydraulics) Memphis

Av. Structural Mechanic (Structures) Memphis

Aviation Ordnanceman Jacksonville

Aviation Fire Control Technician Memphis

Aviation Support Equipment Technician Memphis

Av. Electronics Technician ., „ , . ,.. . . . . Memphis (Navigation) r

Avionics Fundamentals Memphis

Aviation Mechanics Fundamentals Memphis

Aviation Anti-Submarine Warfare Operator

Aviation Maintenance Administrationman

Boilerman

Builder

Builder

Construction Electrician

Construction Electrician

Commissaryman

Commissaryman

Memphis

Memphis

Page

12

12

13

13

14

14

15

15

16

16

17

17

18

18

19

19

20

20

21

21

Great Lakes 22

Davisville 23

Port Hueneme 23

Davisville 24

Port Hueneme 24

Newport 25

San Diego 25

(Index continued on next page)

63

CTA

CTI

CTO

CTR

CTT

CYN

DC

DC

DK

DK

DP

DT

EM

EM

EN

EO

EO

ET

ET

ET

ET

ET

ET

ET

ET

FT

INDEX (continued)

Rating

Communication Technician "A" Branch

Basic Communications Technician "I" Branch

Basic Communications Technician "0" Branch

Basic Communications Technician "R" Branch

Basic Communications Technician "TM Branch

Communications Yeoman

Damage Controlman

Damage Controlman

Disbursing Clerk

Disbursing Clerk

Data Processing Technician

Dental Technician

Electrician's Mate

Electrician's Mate

Engineman

Equipment Operator

Equipment Operator

Electronics Technician (A-l)

Electronics Technician (A-l)

Electronics Technician (A-2)

Electronics Technician (A-2)

Electronics Technician (A-3) (Communication)

Electronics Technician (A-3) (Communication)

Electronics Technician (A-3) (Radar)

Electronics Technician (A-3) (Radar)

Fire Control Technician (Phase I)

School Location Page

Pensacola 2 b

Goodfellow ABF 26

Pensacola 7.1

Pensacola 27

Pensacola 28

Norfolk 28

Philadelphia 29

Treasure Island 29

Newport 50

San Diego 50

Treasure Island 51

San Diego 31

Great Lakes 32

San Diego M

Great Lakes 55

Davisville 54

Port Hueneme 54

Great Lakes 35

Treasure Island 35

Great Lakes 3<

Treasure Island 56

Great Lakes 57

Treasure Island 37

Great Lakes 38

Treasure Island 58

Bainbridge 59


64

INDEX (continued)

Rating

FT Fire Control Technician (Phase I)

FT Fire Control Technician (Phase II)

GM Gunner's Mate (Phase I)

GM Gunner's Mate (Guns) (Phase II)

GMT Gunner's Mate Technician (Class P)

GMT Gunner's Mate Technician (Phase II)

HM Hospital Corpsman

HM Hospital Corpsman

IC Interior Communications Electrician

IC Interior Communications Electrician

MM Machinist's Mate

MN Mineman

MR Machinery Repairman

PC Postal Clerk

PE Polaris Electronics

PH Photographer's Mate

PN Personnelman

PN Personnelman

PN Personnelman

PR Aircrew Survival Equipmentman

PT Air Intelligence Airman

QM Quartermaster

QM Quartermaster

RM Radioman (A-l)

RD Radarman

SD Steward

SF Shipfitter

SK Storekeeper

SK Storekeeper

SM Signalman



Great Lakes 39

Great Lakes 40

Great Lakes 41

Great Lakes 41

Great Lakes 42

Sandia Base 42

Great Lakes 43

San Diego 43

Great Lakes 44

San Diego 44

Great Lakes 45

Charleston 45

San Diego 46

San Diego 46

Dam Neck 47

Pensacola 47

Bainbridge 48

Orlando 48

San Diego 49

Lakehurst 49

Lowry AFB 50

Newport 51

San Diego 51

San Diego 52

Treasure Island 52

San Diego 53

San Diego 53

Newport 54

San Diego 54

Newport 55

65

INDEX (continued)

Rating

SM Signalman (Basic)

ST Sonar Technician (Surface) (A-l)

ST Sonar Technician (A-2)

STS Sonar Technician (Submarine)

TD Tradevman

TM Torpedoman's Mate




TM Torpedoman's Mate (Submarine)

TM Torpedoman's Mate (Submarine)

TM Torpedoman's Mate (Surface)

UT Utilitiesman

YN Yeoman

YN Yeoman


San Diego 55

San Diego 5b

San Diego 56

San Diego 57

Memphis 57

Key West 58

Key West 58

Orlando 59

San Diego 59

Orlando 60

San Diego 60

Orlando 61

Port Hueneme 61

Bainbridge 62

San Diego 62

66

DISTRIBUTION LIST

Assistant Secretary of Navy for Manpower and Reserve Affairs (2) Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense (M£RA) Chief of Naval Operations (OP-059) (OP-098T) (0P-98TL) (2) (OP-987F)

(OP-009) (2) (OP-964) (OP-039) Chief of Naval Personnel: Pers-1; Pers-llb (3 copies w/4 Library Index

Cards); Pers-A; Pers-Al; Pers-A2; Pers-A23; Pers-A3 (w/4 Library Index Cards); Pers-A31; Pers-A32 (10); Pers-A4; Pers-B; Pers-Bl; Pers-B2t; Pers-B2211; Pers-B2232 (2); Pers-P; Pers-Pl; Pers-Pll

Office of Naval Research (Code 458) (2) Commander, Navy Recruiting Command (00) (015) (20) (312) (314) Commanding Officer, Naval Personnel Research and Development Laboratory (3) Chief, Naval Technical Training (N3) (N33) (N335) (N3351) (N34), Memphis Chief of Naval Training (Code 017), (N5), Pensacola Commanding Officer and. Director, Naval Electronics Laboratory Center,

San Diego (2) Commanding Officer, Navy Medical Neuropsychiatric Research Unit, San Diego Commanding Officer, Naval Aerospace Medical Institute, Pensacola (2) Commanding Officer, Naval Examining Center, Great Lakes (2) Commanding Officer, Naval Medical Research Institute, Bethesda Commander, Personnel Research Division, Air Force Human Resources

Laboratory, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas (2) U. S. Army Enlisted Evaluation Center, Fort Benjamin Harrison (2) Headquarters, U. S. Marine Corps (Code A01B), Washington, D. C. Assistant Chief of Staff (G-l), U. S. Marine Corps, Washington, D. C. Superintendent, U. S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Superintendent, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey U. S. Military Academy, West Point, New York U. S. Army Behavior § Systems Research Laboratory, Arlington Superintendent, Naval Academy (Attn: Division of Naval Command and

Management), Annapolis National Research Council, Washington, D. C. National Science Foundation, Washington, D. C. Director, Defense Documentation Center, Alexandria (12) Commander, Anti-Submarine Warfare Force, Atlantic (Code 711) Commander Amphibious Force, Atlantic Fleet Commander Amphibious Force, Pacific Fleet Commander Amphibious Training Command, Atlantic Fleet Commander Amphibious Training Command, Pacific Fleet Commander First Fleet Commander Second Fleet Commander Fleet Training Group, Atlantic Fleet Commander Fleet Training Group, Pacific Fleet Commander Training Command, Atlantic Fleet Commander Training Command, Pacific Fleet Commander in Chief, Atlantic Fleet Commander in Chief, Pacific Fleet Commanding Officer, Naval Officer Candidate School, Newport Commanding Officer, Naval Training Device Center, Orlando

67

DISTRIBUTION (continued)

Center for Naval Analyses, Arlington, Virginia Director, Behavioral Sciences Department, Naval Medical Research

Institute, Bethesda Director, Naval Research Laboratory (Attn: Library, Code 2029 [ONRL]),

Washington, D. C. (15) Director, Utilization and Management Manpower Techniques, Washington, D. Naval Personnel Program Support Activity (Attn: Training Publications

Division), Washington, D. C. Headquarters, Coast Guard (Attn: Chief, Training and Procurement

Division) (Attn: Psychological Research Branch, P Staff), Washington, D. C.

Superintendent (P), Coast Guard Academy, New London Office, Chief of Research and Development, Department of the Army,

(Attn: Army Personnel Research Office), (Attn: Human Factors and Operations Research Division), Washington, D. C.

Headquarters, Air Force (Attn: Science Division, Directorate of Science and Technology, DCS/Research and Development), Washington, D„ C.

Air University Library, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Library, 6570th Personnel Research Laboratory (AMD), Monterey Commander, Naval Schools Command, Newport Commanding Officer, Naval Schools Command, Norfolk Commanding Officer, Naval Schools Command, Treasure Island Commanding Officer, Naval Schools Command, Mare Island Commanding Officer, Service School Command, Bainbridge Commanding Officer, Service School Command, Great Lakes Commanding Officer, Service School Command, Orlando Commanding Officer, Service School Command, San Diego Commanding Officer, Naval Schools Construction, Davisville Commanding Officer, Naval Schools Construction, Port Hueneme Commander, Naval Training Center, Bainbridge Commander, Naval Training Center, Great Lakes Commander, Naval Training Center, Orlando Commander, Naval Training Center, San Diego Commanding Officer, Naval Damage Control Training Center, Philadelphia Commanding Officer, Fleet Sonar School, Key West Commanding Officer, Fleet Anti-Submarine Warfare School, San Diego Commanding Officer, Naval Guided Missiles School, Dam Neck Commanding Officer, Naval Hospital Corps School, Great Lakes Commanding Officer, Naval Hospital Corps School, San Diego Commanding Officer, Naval School Boilerman, Philadelphia Commanding Officer, Naval Submarine School, Groton (Code 80) Commanding Officer, Naval Communications Training Center, Pensacola Commanding Officer, Naval Air Technical Training Center, Glynco Commanding Officer, Naval Air Technical Training Center, Jacksonville Commanding Officer, Naval Air Technical Training Center, Lakehurst Commanding Officer, Naval Air Technical Training Center, Memphis Commanding Officer, Naval Air Technical Training Unit, Pensacola Commanding Officer, Fleet Anti-Air Warfare Training Center, San Diego

68

Commanding Officer, Commanding Officer, Commanding Officer, Commanding Officer,

DISTRIBUTION (continued)

Commanding Officer, Fleet Anti-Air Warfare Training Center, Dam Neck Commanding Officer, Naval Schools Mine Warfare, Charleston Officer in Charge, Naval Communications Training Center Detachment,

Goodfellow AFB Fleet Training Center, Newport Fleet Training Center, San Diego Fleet Training Center, Norfolk Field Command, Defense Nuclear Agency, Kirtland AFB

Senior Naval Officer, Defense Information School, Fort Benjamin Harrison Commanding Officer, Naval Development and Training Center, San Diego Officer in Charge, Armed Forces Intelligence Training Center, Lowry AFB Commandant, FIRST Naval District

THIRD Naval District FOURTH Naval District FIFTH Naval District SIXTH Naval District EIGHTH Naval District

Commandant, NINTH Naval District Commandant, TENTH Naval District Commandant, ELEVENTH Naval District Commandant, TWELFTH Naval District Commandant, THIRTEENTH Naval District Commandant, FOURTEENTH Naval District Commandant, FIFTEENTH Naval District Commandant, SEVENTEENTH Naval District Commandant, Naval District of Washington, D. C.

Commandant, Commandant, Commandant, Commandant, Commandant,

69

U1450

1

naval personnel and training research laboratory · adwl*' um**mtaonrtidal mvokt »ten««...

Documents