nces 2015 mathematics state snapshot report - grade 8

1

Click here to load reader

Upload: educationnc

Post on 16-Apr-2017

258 views

Category:

Education


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NCES 2015 Mathematics State Snapshot Report - Grade 8

2015 Mathematics State Snapshot ReportNorth Carolina ■ Grade 8 ■ Public Schools

Overall ResultsIn 2015, the average score of eighth-grade students in North Carolinawas 281. This was not significantly different from the average score of281 for public school students in the nation.The average score for students in North Carolina in 2015 (281) waslower than their average score in 2013 (286) and was higher than theiraverage score in 2000 (276).The percentage of students in North Carolina who performed at orabove the NAEP Proficient level was 33 percent in 2015. This percentagewas not significantly different from that in 2013 (36 percent) and wasgreater than that in 2000 (27 percent).The percentage of students in North Carolina who performed at orabove the NAEP Basic level was 69 percent in 2015. This percentage wassmaller than that in 2013 (75 percent) and was not significantly differentfrom that in 2000 (67 percent).

Achievement-Level Percentages and Average ScoreResults

2000

2013

2015

Nation (public)

2015

North Carolina Average Score

286*25* 39 27 9

276*33 39 22 5*

28131 37 24 9

28130 38 24 8

Percent below Basicor at Basic

Percent at Proficientor Advanced

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

* Significantly different (p < .05) from state's results in 2015. Significance tests wereperformed using unrounded numbers.NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.

Compare the Average Score in 2015 to OtherStates/Jurisdictions

DC

DoDEA

DE

RI

In 2015, the average score in North Carolina (281) was■ ■ lower than those in 16 states/jurisdictions

■ higher than those in 12 states/jurisdictionsnot significantly different from those in 23 states/jurisdictions

DoDEA = Department of Defense Education Activity (overseas and domestic schools)

Average Scores for State/Jurisdiction and Nation(public)

0

260

270

280

290

300

310

500Score

'00 '03 '05 '07 '09 '11 '13 '15 Year

276*

286*281

272*

284*281

Nation (public) North Carolina

* Significantly different (p < .05) from 2015. Significance tests were performed usingunrounded numbers.

Results for Student Groups in 2015Percentage

ofPercentage at Percentage

Avg. or above atReporting Groups students score Basic Proficient AdvancedRace/EthnicityWhite 52 292 81 43 13Black 25 263 50 16 2Hispanic 16 273 63 23 3Asian 3 311 85 62 36American Indian/Alaska Native 1 261 45 17 2Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander # ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡Two or more races 3 274 63 27 3

GenderMale 51 281 67 33 10Female 49 282 71 33 8

National School Lunch ProgramEligible 58 268 58 19 3Not eligible 42 299 85 52 18

# Rounds to zero.‡ Reporting standards not met.NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding, and because the "Information notavailable" category for the National School Lunch Program, which providesfree/reduced-price lunches, is not displayed. Black includes African American and Hispanicincludes Latino. Race categories exclude Hispanic origin.

Score Gaps for Student GroupsIn 2015, Black students had an average score that was 29 points lowerthan that for White students. This performance gap was notsignificantly different from that in 2000 (35 points).In 2015, Hispanic students had an average score that was 20 pointslower than that for White students. Data are not reported for Hispanicstudents in 2000, because reporting standards were not met.In 2015, male students in North Carolina had an average score that wasnot significantly different from that for female students.In 2015, students who were eligible for free/reduced-price school lunch,an indicator of low family income, had an average score that was 31points lower than that for students who were not eligible. Thisperformance gap was not significantly different from that in 2000 (28points).

NOTE: Statistical comparisons are calculated on the basis of unrounded scale scores or percentages.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),various years, 2000-2015 Mathematics Assessments.