necrotic spot viruses - journals.flvc.org
TRANSCRIPT
Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 108:51-53. 1995.
SUSCEPTIBILITY OF PURPLE BELL VINE TO CUCUMBER MOSAIC AND IMPATIENS
NECROTIC SPOT VIRUSES
V.Jones and GaryW. Simone
Florida Extension Plant Disease Clinic
Plant Pathology Department
University of Florida, IFAS
Gainesville, FL 32611-0830
Additional index words. Ornamental.
Abstract. The susceptibility of the tropical perennial, purple bell vine (Rhodochiton atro-sanguineum (Zucc.) Rothm.) to a range
of plant viruses was determined. Stock plants were obtained
commercially, indexed by direct or indirect enzyme-linked im-
munosorbent assay (ELISA) for tomato spotted wilt virus
(TSWV) and Impatiens necrotic spot virus (INSV) and main
tained in the greenhouse. Vegetatively propagated liners were
mechanically inoculated at the six to eight leaf stage with one
isolate each of nine viruses: cucumber mosaic (CMV), INSV,
pepper mottle, potato X, potato Y, tobacco etch, tobacco mo
saic, tomato mottle, and TSWV. Inoculated plants were exam
ined for symptoms on a weekly basis beginning 5 days after
inoculation. Plants were destructively sampled 6 weeks after
inoculation and assayed by direct ELISA, indirect ELISA, or nu
cleic acid hybridization using complementary DNA probes.
Purple bell vine was determined to be susceptible to both CMV
and INSV. CMV produced chlorotic local lesions and devel
oped systemically, causing leaf deformity, mosaic, exaggerat
ed leaf dentations, and marginal leaf chlorosis. INSV produced
chlorotic and necrotic local lesions and developed systemical
ly producing leaf deformity and flower symptoms consisting of
spotting, deformity, and reduction in size. TSWV did produce
local lesions in inoculated leaves but typically never went sys
temic within the plant. The other viruses tested did not infect
purple bell vine.
The purple bell vine (Rhodochiton atrosanguineum = R. vol-
ubile Otto & Dietr.) is one of many introduced species that
contribute to the attractiveness of Florida's landscapes. As
these species gain in popularity, they pose risks for the occur
rence of new plant diseases to Florida. A landscape sample of
this plant received in 1991 at the Florida Extension Plant Dis
ease Clinic reflected viral symptomatology. This was subse
quently determined to be infected by the Impatiens necrotic
spot virus (INSV=TSWV-I strain), a new host for this virus.
Plant disease literature on this host was non-existent at the
time (Alfieri et al., 1984; Farr et al., 1989; Thornberry. 1966).
We evaluated the susceptibility of this flowering ornamental
to a range of endemic Florida viral pathogens to anticipate
other viral diseases that might occur in nursery production or
landscapes with this species.
The genus Rhodochiton'^ a member of the Scrophulariace-
ae and represents an obscure genus of three species endemic
to Mexico. The purple bell vine is presently the only cultivat
ed species (Huxley et al., 1992). It is grown as a greenhouse
ornamental or a warm-season annual in the temperate areas
while being used as a perennial vine in south central and
south Florida. This vine is cold sensitive below 5°C (40°F).
The appeal of this flowering vine is in the purple-black flow-
Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. N-01209.
ers that consist of a lobed, rose-pink calyx and a blood-red to
maroon-colored corolla.
Materials and Methods
Purple bell vine liners were obtained from Logie's Green
houses (Davidson, CT 06329) in the fall of 1992. Liners were
grown in Metro-Mix 300™ (Scotts-Sierra Hort. Products Co.,
Marysville, OH 43041) in 5-inch pots as stock plants. Plants
were indexed serologically for both INSV and tomato spotted
wilt virus (TSWV) by commercially available direct enzyme
linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) from Agdia, Inc.
(Elkhart, IN 46514). Plants were then vegetatively propagat
ed. Plant production and inoculation studies were performed
in a glass greenhouse under 3000-3500 foot candles and a
temperature range of 18°C (65°F) to 28°C (82°F).
Plants received overhead irrigation every 2 days and were
fertilized with a hose proportioner using Peters Peat-Lite Spe
cial (20-10-20) (Scotts-Sierra Hort. Products Co., Marysville,
OH 43041). The plants received weekly application of insec
ticides rotated among the tank-mix combination of acephate
(Orthene®) + dienochlor (Pentac®) + bifenthrin (Talstar®) or
kinoprene (Einstar II®) or diazinon (Knox-out®).
Nine viruses were chosen for a virulence evaluation by me
chanical transmission in Rhodochiton. Viruses used included
cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), pepper mottle virus (Pep-
MoV), potato virus Y (PVY), tobacco etch virus (TEV), potato
virus X (PVX), tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), tomato mottle vi
rus (TMoV), INSV, and TSWV. All viral isolates were endemic
to Florida, and were part of the Florida Extension Plant Dis
ease Clinic virus collection. All viruses were maintained in
desiccated host tissue over DrieriteR (W. A. Hammond Drier-
ite Co. Xenia, OH 45385) at -24°C (-6°F) except for TMoV,
INSV and TSWV. These viruses were maintained in living res
ervoir hosts: TMoV in Lycopersicon esculentumh., INSV in Impa
tiens balsamina L., and TSWV in Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Burley
21.
Inoculum preparation for all viruses except TMoV in
volved mechanical transmission to one of two reservoir hosts.
Both TSWV and INSV were inoculated into Nicotiana
benthamiana. Mechanical transmission was achieved by dust
ing three leaves of each reservoir host with 320 grit carborun
dum. Virus-infected tissue (either dried or fresh tissue) was
ground in a mortar and pestle over ice at a 1:10 ratio of tissue
weight to volume of buffer. The buffer used was 0.5M potassi
um phosphate (pH 7.2), with 0.005% mercaptoethanol as a
reducing agent. The virus inoculum was rubbed onto the car
borundum-coated leaves with sterile fabric interfacing. Reser
voir hosts were allowed to become systemically infected and
then were checked by light microscopy for appropriate plant
virus inclusions as a test of identity and purity.
Inoculations of Rhodochiton were conducted in the spring
of 1993. Four to eight plants were inoculated across six to
eight leaves per plant by the procedure described previously.
A known susceptible host was inoculated with each virus as a
positive control. Plants rubbed with buffer alone served as a
negative control. Plants were observed daily for local lesion
development and the onset of systemic infection. Plants were
destructively sampled 6 weeks after inoculation. Plants were
Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 108: 1995. 51
subsampled to include roots, lower stem, inoculated leaves, new leaves, flowers (if present) and the shoot meristem to de termine virus location.
The presence of the virus was verified by one of three
methods. TMoV samples (20ul) were extracted in 40ul of
TRIS(10mM)/EDTA(lmM) buffer (standardized to pH=8.0). Plant sap was spotted onto a nitrocellulose mem
brane and probed with a P32 labelled complementary DNA
probe for TMoV (courtesy of E. Hiebert, Plant Pathology
Dept, Univ. of Fla., Gainesville). Both TSWV and INSV were
assayed by direct ELISA. The remainder of the viruses were as
sayed by indirect ELISA, using virus-specific antisera and alka
line phosphatase conjugated goat anti-rabbit antisera (Sigma
Chemical Corp., St. Louis, MO 63178-9916). Both direct and
indirect ELISA were conducted in 96-well microtitre plates and results were read with a Molecular Devices Emax Reader
(Molecular Devices Corp. Menlo Park, CA 94025).
Results and Discussion
The following viruses were unable to infect Rhodochiton at
rosanguineum: PepMoV, PVX, PVY, TEV, TMoV and TMV. Se-
rological assays yielded no evidence of virus replication and
movement into this host (data not presented).
Plants inoculated with INSV developed chlorotic local le
sions on inoculated leaves within 7 to 10 days. These lesions
enlarged into necrotic ringspots within 2 weeks. The virus
moved rapidly in the plant. Symptoms of necrotic flecking,
leaf malformation, and ringspots developed in systemically in fected tissues 3 to 7 days after local lesions (Fig. 1). Flowers
produced on infected plants were reduced in size, with dis
torted, necrotic corollas (Fig. 1). Systemic symptoms were not
consistent on all branches from an infected plant. After 6
weeks, plants were rinsed free of soil and sequentially sam
pled from the roots to the shoot meristem to determine the
virus distribution within the plant. A sample stratification of
two plants using ELISA is presented in Table 1. Shaded data
squares represent positive absorbance values that indicate the
presence of this virus in specific plant samples. The virus had
proceeded from the inoculated leaf throughout the plant.
Note the absence of virus in the lower stem node (below inoc
ulation point) and the absence from Vine A leaves 2 and 3.
This erratic distribution is characteristic for both INSV and
TSWV in their respective hosts.
The inoculation of TSWV typically failed to proceed sys
temically in any experimental unit. Inoculated leaves did de
velop small, necrotic local lesions within 2 weeks. A plant
stratification is presented in Table 1. TSWV could be detected
in the inoculated leaf and in this atypical instance, one leaf
immediately above this point at the time of destructive sam
pling. In all other TSWV-challenged plants, this virus was se-
rologically detected in only the inoculated leaf. Repeated
tests failed to show any TSWV movement after inoculation,
therefore Rhodochiton is considered a non-host for TSWV.
Rhodochiton plants challenged with CMV were systemically
infected. Local lesions developed as chlorotic spots within 7
days of inoculation. Inoculated leaves abscised within 2 weeks.
Systemic infection was evident within 14 days. Typical symp
toms of systemic CMV infection in Rhodochiton included leaf
distortion, exaggerated leaf dentation, mosaic and broad ar
eas of marginal chlorosis (Fig. 2). Systemically infected plants
bore no flowers during the experimental period. Two strati
fied, CMV-infected plants are presented in Table 2 in contrast
Figure 1. Symptoms induced by Impatiens necrotic spot virus (INSV) in
purple bell vine. (A) Chlorotic concentric ring spotting in leaves. (B) Flower
distortion induced by INSV compared to healthy flowers (far right and left).
Table 1. Distribution of tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) and Impatiens
necrotic spot virus (INSV) in Rhodochiton atrosanguineum 6 weeks after inoculation.
Plant tissue
Crown roots
Lower stem
Inoculated leaf
Vine A-leaf 1
-leaf 2
-leaf 3
Vine B-leaf 1
-leaf 2
-leaf 3
-flower
INSV
2.049*
0.087
1.684
0.164
0.089
0.079
2.027
L922
2.172
1,242
Direct ELISA stratification
TSWV
0.064
0.059
2,010
1.556
0.086
0.057
0.061
0.065
0.062
0.064
HEALTHY
0.068
0.085
0.065
0.078
0.069
0.077
0.067
0.067
0.074
0.085
'Shaded data squares represent positive ELISA absorbance values that indi cate the presence of virus.
to a healthy control plant. CMV did not proceed uniformly
throughout the plant and thus some leaf positions were with out detectable virus.
Rhodochiton atrosanguineum has been determined to be a
new host for INSV and for CMV in Florida. This plant must be
recognized as a potential reservoir host for these viruses in
nurseries producing both floral and bedding plant species.
The perennial nature of this vine in south Florida provides an
52 Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 108: 1995.
Figure 2. Leaf deformity, marginal chlorosis and mosaic caused by cucum
ber mosaic virus in purple bell vine.
opportunity for this species to act as a reservoir host for both
these viruses in the landscape as well.
Literature Cited
Alfieri, S. A. Jr., K. R. Langdon, C. Wehlburg and J. W. Kimbrough. 1984. In
dex of plant diseases in Florida. Bulletin 11. Fla. Dept. of Agr. Consumer
Services, Div. Plant Industry. Gainesville, FL.
Table 2. Distribution of cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) in Rhodochiton atro-
sanguineum 6 weeks after inoculation.
Indirect ELISA stratification
CMV
Plant tissue Plant 1 Plant 2 HEALTHY
Roots
Roots
Lower stem
Inoculated leaf
Vine A-leaf 1
-leaf 2
-leaf 3
Vine B-leaf 1
-leaf 2
-leaf 3
Shoot apex
1.228*
0.735
1:124
0.576
0.156
L661
0.548
1.128
2.158
1.799
L952
1.493
1.048
0.214
0.420
0.160
2.081
0.114
0.142
0.175
0.273
—
0.136
0.137
0.106
0.156
0.151
0.126
0.120
0.136
0.112
0.112
0.127
'Shaded data squares represent positive ELISA absorbance values that indi
cate the presence of virus.
Farr, D. F., G. F. Bills, G. P. Chamures and A. Y. Rossman. 1989. Fungi on
plants and plant products in the United States. APS Press. St. Paul, MN.
Huxley, A., M. Griffiths and M. Levy (eds.). 1992. The new Royal Horticultur
al Society dictionary of gardening. Vol. 4. Macmillan Press Ltd. London,
England.
Thornberry, H. H. 1966. Plant pests of importance to North American agri
culture. Index of Plant Virus Diseases. HndBk. 307. U.S. Dept. of Agr.,
Washington, D.C.
Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 108:53-57. 1995.
PREEMERGENCE WEED CONTROL IN TUBEROSE1
James P. Gilreath
Gulf Coast Research and Education Center
University of Florida, IFAS
Bradenton, FL 34203
Additional index words. Herbicide, tuber, Polianthes tuberosa.
Abstract. Thirteen preemergence herbicides were evaluated for
crop response and weed control in tuberose (Polianthes tube
rosa L.) grown in flatwoods soil. Each herbicide was applied
twice during 1986 and four times in 1987. Plots were hand-weeded weekly during 1986 to evaluate herbicide effects,
whereas herbicide treated plots were handweeded only prior to
each application in 1987 to evaluate weed control as well as
herbicide effects. Oxyfluorfen and thiobencarb were injurious
to tuberose when applied pre- or postemergence in 1986,
whereas methazole and clomazone only damaged plants when
applied postemergence. Tuberose plant vigor was not affected by herbicide treatment until after three applications of herbi
cide in 1987 at which time only those plants treated with prodi-
amine or oryzalin were as vigorous as plants in handweeded
Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. N-01108.
Mention of a specific proprietary product does not constitute an endorse
ment by the author or the University of Florida. Growers should consult the
label before application of any herbicide.
plots. Crabgrass (Digitaria ciliaris (Retz.) Koel.) control was
generally excellent with all treatments, except methazole, oxy
fluorfen, and thiobencarb. Control of eclipta {Eclipta alba L.)
was good with all herbicides until after the third application
when only napropamide, methazole, clomazone, and oryzalin
controlled eclipta as well as handweeding. After four applica
tions of herbicide treatments, napropamide no longer con
trolled eclipta as well as handweeding; whereas, methazole,
clomazone, and oryzalin continued to control eclipta as well as
handweeding.
Plots treated with cinmethylin, prodiamine, and oryzalin pro
duced as many flowers and equivalent flower weight as hand-
weeded plots. Foliage production was similar to spike
production with the exception that less biomass was produced
with cinmethylin than with handweeding. More tubers were
produced in plots treated with cinmethylin, DCPA, clomazone,
and oryzalin than with napropamide in 1986. Prodiamine, di-
ethatyl, and oryzalin were the only herbicides which produced
more tubers than the nontreated control plots (weedy) in 1987.
Oryzalin, prodiamine, clomazone, and alachlor produced as
many medium to large size tubers as handweeding.
Tuberose, grown for both flowers and tubers, has never
been a large acreage cut flower crop in Florida, in part due to
production problems. Historically, weed control has been
one of the predominant production problems. Although
some weed control research has been conducted (W. Skroch,
personal communication), no published reports have been
Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 108: 1995. 53