negotiating to win win
TRANSCRIPT
Negotiating to WIN-WIN
Prof. Subir Verma
Management Development Institute
Gurgaon
Understanding Negotiations
What is Negotiation?
“Negotiation is a process of two or more parties
exchanging a series of offers to arrive at a
mutually acceptable resolution of their
conflict/disagreement over goals and interests
(or claims over resources)”.
Negotiation Situation is when… Two or more parties makes a decision about
their interdependent goals and objectives. The parties are committed to peaceful means
for resolving the dispute. There is no clear cut or established method
for making the decision.
3 fundamental questions in Negotiation
What do you want Why should they negotiate What are your alternatives
STRUCTURE OF•Outcomes•Goals
Influence on Goals and Outcomes
Personality, Values, Preferences, Social Context
INFLUENCING
PROCESSES
•Power
•Persuasion
•Communication
CONTENT
Interdependence
Trust
NEGOTIATION PROCESS•Offer•Counter offer•Concession•Compromise•Agreement
Your Negotiation Style
Negotiation Styles
DODGER
HAGGLER
DREAMER PROBLEM SOLVER
COMPETITOR
CONCERN FOR SELF
CONCERN FOR OTHERS
Dodger
Strength Weakness Best for
Shows indifferenceWill assess risk firstHas low needs
Cannot make decisionsDislikes negotiatingFails to prepareIs not comfortable with people /differences
Avoiding entry into bad dealsTesting the market when issues are trivialRelationship is insignificantAvoiding no win situation
Dreamer
Strength Weakness Best for
Seeks relationshipShows concern for othersValues friendship
Wants to be well likedConcedes easilyPreserves relationships at own expenseGives too much away
Seeking entry into new marketsDealing with relationship oriented marketsWhen you are powerless but have no wish to block the other personWhen you realize you are wrong
Haggler
Strength Weakness Best for
•Makes quick decisions•Likes making deals•Has no strong positions•Is easy to deal with•Is open to counter proposals
•Is win-lose oriented•Accepts lower outcomes•Is satisfied with quick results•Is short term oriented•Gives in easily
•Cooperation is important but time & resources are ltd.•When finding even sub-optimal solution is better than a stalemate•Issues that are not considered important•Breaking deadlocks•Restarting discussion
Competitor
Strength Weakness Best for
•Is a risk taker•Cares for own needs•Controls discussions•Is persuasive /persistent•Enjoys pressure
•Is not interested in other party•Is mostly short term oriented•Is unwilling to shift positions•Is poor listener•Leads to frequent breakdowns
•Emergency Decisions•You are right and being right is more important than preserving relationships•Competitive Markets•When similar styles are used
Problem Solver
Strength Weakness Best forShares informationCreates valuesIs win-win orientedSeeks win-win dealsDevelops optionsIs good listenerAsks a lot of questions
Is a slow decision makerCan be unrealistic at timesTakes timeRequires thorough preparation
Long term dealsRepeat businessComplex negotiationsImportant Deals
The Perceived Feasibility Perspective1. The extent of aspirations of both parties
2. The degree of firmness in aspirations and resistance to yield
3. The perceived integrative potential Faith in own problem solving ability Momentum from previous success Availability of mediator Other’s perceived readiness for problem solving
4. The Role of Trust5. The Perceived cost
Selecting an Interactive Strategy1. Integrating-Integrating=Integrating2. Integrating-Competing=Principled collaboration or
soft competition3. Integration-Accommodating=Integrating4. Integration-Avoiding= Focused Accommodation5. Competing-Competing= Competing or Principled
collaboration6. Competing-Accommodating= Soft Competition or
integration7. Competing-Avoiding= Principled Collaboration or
Soft Competition
From Positional Bargaining to Principled Negotiation
Focus on Interests not positions How do you identify interests:
Ask Why Ask Why Not: Think about their choices
Understand Human Needs Talk about Interests
Invent Options for Mutual GainsDiagnosis: 4 obstacles
Premature judgment Searching for the single answer The assumption of a fixed pie Thinking that solving their problem is
their problem
Prescription:
Separate inventing options from deciding
Broaden the options rather than look for a
single answer: The circle chart
Search for mutual gains: identify shared
interests
Make their decision easy
Step III Approaches
•What are possible Strategies/ideas
•Generate and List them
Step IV Action Ideas
•What might be done
•What Specific Steps?
Step I Problem•What’s wrong•What are current symptoms•What are disliked facts
Step II Analysis•Diagnose Problems•Categorize Symptoms•Suggest Causes•Discover Barriers
Insist on Objective Criteria Fair Standards Fair Procedure Negotiate on that basis
Frame each issue as a joint search for objective criteria
Reason and be open to reason Never yield to pressure, only to principle
Negotiation Strategy
The Negotiation Strategy…
Distributive Strategy: Claiming all the profit or the maximum share for oneself—winning it all
Integrative Strategy: Creating Value (expanding the pie) and finding solutions that best fit needs of all or most parties—especially over time.
Mixed-Motive Strategy: Expanding the pie and meeting the needs of all or most parties as much as possible while claiming appropriate share.
Negotiation Issues
Reservation Price BATNA: Know yours and Others Better your BATNA, the greater your power
Learning Points
BATNA is your power in negotiations Reservation Price is your worst deal acceptable.
It is based on BATNA What is Bargaining zone or ZOPA (area of
overlap of RPs) What is the role of Aspiration point (Target):
keeps you motivated
5 20 25 30 35 40 451510
Buyer’sReservation Price
Buyer’sAspiration
Seller’sAspiration
ZOPA
Seller’sReservation Price
Buyer (AccelMedia)
Seller (GTechnica)
Goals/Interests:-Purchase 10,000-18,000 units-One Shot DealBATNA = No Alternative Source
Goals/Interests:-Sell up to 15,000 units-One Shot DealBATNA = No Alternative Buyer
Negotiation Tactics
Aspirations The Openings (who makes the first offer) Anchorings Pattern of concessions (larger first and small
later to signal that you are reaching your RP) Threats (if you continue negotiating after that
you lose credibility)
Issues…
SIMPLE AND DIRECT You’ve worked with the party before Deal is bogging down Immediate closure is a goal
PRESS AND PUSH Your side is stronger The other side needs a quick close You want to asses limits
Strategic Attitude
Strategic Attitudes
COOL & ALOOF The other side is stronger Your side is under time pressure You have other alternative deals
Commonly Used Tactics…
Patience: helps to defuse and control the deal
Slow Agony: Defense against High Pressure
Apathy: Defense against High Pressure
Empathy: Breaks deadlocks & Bridge Gaps
Sudden Shifts: To dislodge blockages and overcome obstacles
Faking: An art in Trading
Some Commonly Used Tactics…
Walking: When other side has more power and pushed you too hard
Fait Accompli: To control a critical issue
Salami: To make small gains
Limits: To set bounds to further pushing
Deadlines: To clinch a deal
Antagonism: Not a good tactic: evokes same response
Limited Authority: Side A uses to bargain hard,
to use time for agonizing and testing patience. Counter: by Asking what the authority wants and the way they want.
Bottom Line: To help you come up with creative solution to ensure a deal.
Saying No: To get “No” to elicit why of it and know the needs of the customer more
Expectation and Control: Split non-negotiable with negotiable
Auction: Find out where is it the lowest and then build solutions/trade-offs around it.
Rationale: Satisfies the others and makes them negotiate
Concessions: Make it conditional and not unilateral
Negotiations Involves…
Interests, Rights and Power
Operational Implications
Do your Homework Build relationships whenever possible Avoid quick concessions Accentuate the positives Maintain your composure Don’t Give up
Thank You