nepal ipm review 2006

8/14/2019 Nepal IPM Review 2006

1/45

1

IPM REGIONAL REVIEWAND

COORDINATION WORKSHOP2006

DISTRICT AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT OFFICE

RAMECHHAP, NEPAL

arihar Adhikari, M. Sc. Ag. Plant Pathologylant Protection OfficerADO, Ramechhap


2/45

2

Powerpoint Presentation Layout

RamechhapSlide content Slide No

Attention 1-2

Ramechhap Terrain / Agriculture 3-12

Irrigation structure problems 13-15

Agricultural marketing Ramechhap 16-18

Farmers priorities 19-20

Role of DADO/PPO/HDO/AEO 21-32

IPM review Ramechhap 33-43

+


3/45

lr;fkfgL

;'gf/kfgL

u'G;L

nvgk'/

uf}Zjf/f

6f]s/k'/

lbdLkf]v/L

lxn]b]jL

a]yfg

vlgofkfgL

/fsfy'd

dem'jf

eL/kfgL e6f}nL

ks/jf;

dfsfb'd

ufunebf}/]vfF8fb]jL

bf]/Daf88'jf

rgv'lk+v'/L

k'/f

gfufpF

km'nf;L

u]n'

dGynL

en'jfhf]/

/fd]5fk

;'sfhf]/

cf]v|]gL lxdu+uf

/fdk'/

;fF3'6f/

s7hf]/

;fn'kf6Lb]p/fnL

uf]7ufpF

gfubxlah'nLsf]6

ltNk'

lvDtL

kmk'{

gfdf8L

;}k'

b'/fufpF

jfDtL

lk|tL

e'hL

u'Kt]Zj/a]tfnL

/:gfn'

7f];]

s'e's

f:ynL

r'r'/]

u'Db]n

*%+%)

@* @&+@*

@&+%)

* +#%*%+%)

* +#%

^ ) ^ !@ ls=dL=lhNnf l;dfgf

uflj; l;dfgf

]t lrGx

l;Gw'kfNrf]s

sfe|]knf~rf]s

l;Gw'nL

cf]vn9'+uf

;f]n'v'Da'

/fd]5fk

cjl:ylt gS;f

gS;f!

bf]nvf

3

/fd]5fksf] gSzf


4/454

and Terrain : Agriculture Ramechha

lxdu+uf uf=lj=;=


5/455

River Basin based

Cereals and Vegetables PockeBhatauli-Pakarbas-Bhaluwajor

Manthali-Khurkot Road

tfdfsf]zL gbL

jf; uf= lj= ;=


6/456

Agriculture Ramechhap

dem'jf uf=lj=;=, /fd]5fk


7/457

gr cu ura a s cs amec apAlmost all crops are grown (500 -4500 m)

S.No Major Crop

Area

Under cultivation

Production

volume

Crop

productivity (ton/ha)

Maize 23008 66723.2 2.9

Millet 5057 6068.4 1.20

Rice 9408 36220.8 3.85

Wheat 483 108.6.0 2.25

Citrus 1139 11092.0 11.8

Vegetables 530 6148.0 11.6

Potato 3040 29913.5 9.84

Pulses 370 306.0 1.02

Oilseed crops 437 349.6 0.8


8/458

d'uL6f/ kmfF6df Joj;flos

t/sf/L v]tL


9/459

wfg kmfF6, dGynL ;b/d'sfd


10/4510

h'gf/ au}+rfdf tf]/Lsf] cGt/jfnL


11/4511


tf]/L af/L, df8L kmfF6

dlxnfx? sf]bf] uf]8b} cf]v|]gLdf h'gf/ ju}rfks/jf; uf=lj=;=df ux'F v]tL

Jo=t/sf/L v]tL, ks/jf; jGbfsf] k'tnLsf nfef{x?;'o{d'vL v]tL, dGynL

A i lt R hh


12/45

12


t/sf/L v]tLsf nfuL

u[lxl0f4f/f kfgL ;+sng

j]df};dL t/sf/L a]gf{ pTkfbgkl/jf/, s[lif / kz'j=s[=lj=c= :ofp cjnf]sg ub}{

lh=s[=lj=sf= sf] ;xof]udf s[ifs

;d"x4f/f kfgL kf]v/L lgdf{0f

l;Tvf kmfF6 l;+rfO{ cfof]hgf,

dem'jf uf=lj=;=

e'ld:yfg hgHof]lt cfO{=lk=Pd=s[ifs kf7zfnf ;+rflnt ks]6If]qdf lgl/If0f ub}{ jfu=lj=c=


13/45

13

a]zL kmfF6df l;+rfO{ ;+/rgfsf ;d:ofx?


14/45

14

a]zL kmfF6df l;+rfO{ ;+/rgfsf ;d:ofx?

az kmf6df ;+rfO ;+/rgfsf ;d:ofx?


15/45

15

az kmf6df ;rfO ;/rgfsf ;d:ofx?a]zL kmfF6 -dGynL_df l;+rfO{ ;+/rgfsf ;d:ofx


16/45

16

Agricultural Marketing Ramechh

dlxnf ;d"x t/sf/L j]Rb}

dlxnf ;d"x t/sf/L j]Rb

dlxnf ;d"x

dGynL xf6, /fd]5fk

s[ifsx? h'gf/ jf]s]/ NofpFb} df;' sf/f]jf/


17/45

17

gricultural Marketing Ramechha

/fd]5fk xf6 jhf/, /fd]5fk(

M M k i R hh


18/45

18

Meat Marketing Ramechhap

l;Tvf kmfF6 l;+rfO{ cfof]hgf

Farmers' Priorities


19/45

19

Farmers Priorities Acquire land

Legalise ownership Arrange for family experiences

Socio-cultural considerations

Cropping pattern based on topography

Family interest and market value

Seeding, broadcasting or transplanting Irrigation and weeding management

Intercultural operations & pest management (IPM)

Crop maturity and harvest

Processing and storage

Marketing of surplus product Family expenditure and the continuum


20/45

20

-farmer, Okhreni VDC

bl ti i t t f i R hh


21/45

21

roblematic insect pests of crops in Ramechha

Citrus green bug Fruit fly of cucurbits

Citrus scale insect Citrus fruit fly

DBM Various aphids, Citrus aphids

Mango stone weevil Cucurbit stem splitter Cut worms Potato tuber moth

Red ants Rice leaf folder

Termites Red pumpkin beetle

Epilachna beetle Cabbage bud grasshopper

Red spider mite Citrus nematode

Litchi leaf curl mite Brinjal fruit and shoot borer

Litchi bug Banana stem borer

Banana bunch beetle Chilly thrips

P bl ti di f


22/45

22

Problematic diseases of crops

in Ramechhap Citrus gummosis Leaf spot of maize Damping off of vegetables Leaf spot of rice

Wilt of solanaceae Chilly anthracnose

Papaya virus Blight of chilly

Alternaria of brassicas Powdery mildew of citrus Blast of rice Downy mildew of cucurbits

Chilly mosaic virus Gummy stem blight of BG

Yellow rust of wheat Black rot of crucifers

Cauliflower boron deficiency Bacterial soft rot of cabbage

Blight of potato


23/45

23

Role of DADO / IPM Officer

Rofp v]tL ljsf;dGynLdf Rofp v]tL /fd]5fk jhf/df Rofp v]tL

R l f DADO / IPM Offi


24/45

24


df}/L ljsf;df k|fljlws ;xof]ugf=k|f=;= s[i0f jxfb'/ e'h]n rfsf lgl/If0f ub}{}{}{



25/45

25


cf]v|]gL&, x'lbndf /]zd

sfo{qmd


26/45

26

Joj:yfkg gePsf] ju}+rf

/f]u tyf sL/f lgoGq0fdf k|fljlws ;xof]u


27/45

27


;fdfGo Joj:yfkg ePsf] ju}+rf / v'zL au}+rf wgL


28/45

28


Joj:yfkg gePsf] ju}+rf ;fdfGo Joj:yfkg ePsf] ju}+rf

;d:of lgbfg cleofg-k|bz{g ljt/0f_-lgnf] t'yf], r'gf, vgLh t]n ljt/0f_

l ]l L ] ]


29/45

29

lhNnf :t/df b]lvPsf sL/fx?sf] k|sf]k

wld/f

aGbfsf] k'tnLsf nfef{x?

aGbfsf] k'tnLsf km'nsf] y'k|f]]

Damage by Red Spider Mite


30/45

30

Damage by Red Spider Mite

Role of IPM Officer


31/45

31

Role of IPM Officer

msfnL cfO{=lk=Pd= s[ifs kf7zfnf, ;'sfhf]/# d'8fhf]/df ;xhLs/0f ub}{

af=;=c= xl/x/ clwsf/L, jfujfgL ljsf; clws[t e/t jxfb'/ cfrfo{

/ ;]=s]=sf k|f=;= hxfg jxfb'/ sfsL{

IPM FFS

Pesticide use on crops


32/45

32

s s psRamechhap

Pesticide use is minimal and is applied incommercial chilly, potato, cucurbits, etc.

Nuvan for almost all insects, bed bugs,animal shed, sleeping bed (palang)

Rogor, Dimethoate for citrus green bug,scale insects, aphids, lepidopterous larvae

Mineral oil for citrus scale insects Dithane M-45, Krylaxyl gold and Bavistin

for blights of potato, vegetables, chilly, etc

VDCwise FFS Conducted


33/45

33

Ramechhap (12/55)SNo

VDC Crop Location FarmerFacilitator

AEO(2057.5-)

PPO(2060.8-)

HDO(2061.11-)

1 Sukajor Cau, Junar

Cab, Junar

Rice, Chilly

TPS, Rice

Cauli, Junar

Rice

Rice

TPS

Cauliflower

Rice

Rice

12 Phulasi Rice P 1 1 - - -

S-3, 6, 9 2 -

5

2

2 Okhreni O - 8 1 1

2

-

1

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3 Pakarbas P 3 - 1 -

4 Khimti K 1 1 1 -

5 Ramechhap R 4 - 1 -

6 Tilpung T 9 2 - -

7 Manthali M 1, 4 - 2 -

8 Bhatauli B 2 - 1 -

9 Bhaluwajor B 1 - 1 -

10 Chisapani C 8 1 - -

11 Gelu G 7 1 - -

4Total FFS(21) 15 9 8 2

FFS REPORTING FORMAT (270 PAGES)v08 !M s[ifs kf7zfnfsf] clGtd r]sln:6 tyf k|ltj]bg -kfgf (%_


34/45

34

;xh stf{n] kf7zfnf ;+rfng ug{ dfu u/]sf] lgj]bg kfgf !

clGtd r]sln:6 kfgf %

ljj/0ffTds k|ltj]bg kfgf %

afnL rqm, n}=lj=, tof/L j}7s, ;fKtflxs xflhl/, sfo{tflnsf kfgf @^

rf/ pk;d"x k|To]ssf]AESA COMPILATION kfgf *

t'ngfTds ;fKtflxs ;f/f+z s[ifs tl/sf kfgf !^

t'ngfTds ;fKtflxs ;f/f+z cfO{ lk Pd tl/sf kfgf !^

s[ifs kf7zfnfsf] ;fKtflxs l/kf]6{ kfgf !^

s[ifs lbazdf pkl:ylt / lg0f{o k|ltlnlk kfgf @

kmf]6f] !@ k|lt, Jofg/ yfg !v08 @M s[lif kof{j/0f k|0ffnL ljZn]if0f -kfgf !@*_rf/ pk;d"x k|To]ssf] s[ifs tl/sfdf s[lif kof{j/0f k|0ffnL ljZn]if0f kfgf $ x !^ = ^$

rf/ pk;d"x k|To]ssf] cfO{ lk Pd tl/sfdf s[lif k= k|= lj= kfgf $ x !^ = ^$

v08 #M vr{ ljj/0f -kfgf $&_kmd{ g+ ! kfgf @

kmd{ g+ @ kfgf !

kmd{ g+ # ;+u ;DjlGwt ef}r/ kfgf ^

ef}r/ ;+Vof ! b]lv !( sf] kfgf !(

;fbf sfuhdf 6fF; u/L ef}r/df gTyL u/LPsf] lan ekf{O{ ;+Vof kfgf !(

PPO / IPM Trainer: Harihar Adhikari*


35/45

35

PPO / IPM Trainer: Harihar Adhikari(IPM Training: 2056, Rice, Janakpur)

FFS FacilitatedFund SourceS.N. FFS Name Location Crop

PPD DADO

1 Kalapani IPM FFS Phulasi-1 Rice * - 2060/03/16-2060/8/05 Dipsikha Dahal -

2 Kalikadevi IPM FSS Sukajor-6 Junar - * 2060/7/22-2060/11/17 - Jahan Bdr karki

3 Janajyoti IPM FSS Khimti-1 Paddy * - 2061/03/21- 2061/7/23 Dipsikha Dahal -

4Chanaute Dhande IPM FSS Tilpung-9

Paddy * -2061/03/28- 2061/7/24

Dipsikha Dahal -

5 Raktakali IPM FSS Sukajor-3 Cauliflower - * 2061/8/12 - 2061/12/13 - Jahan Bdr karki

6Bhimsen IPM FSS Chisapani-8

Paddy * -2062/3/05 -2062/08/25

Dipsikha Dahal

Somesh Thapa

7 Kartike Taja Tarkari Utpadan Ramechhap-4 Cauliflower - * 2062/ 08/ - 2062/11/ Narayan Kumar magar Jahan Bdr Karki

8Bhumithan Janajtoti IPM FSS Sukajor-9

Cauliflower * -2062/08/01-2062/12/26

Padam Lama

Hari Bahadur Ghising

Jahan Bdr Karki

9

Manakamana IPM FFS Gelu-7

Rice * -

2063/03/14 - 2063/08/

Dipsikha Dahal

Somesh Thapa

Shankha Bir Majhi

10 Trishakti Janajagaran IPM

FSSSukajor-9

Cauliflower * -2063/04/5- 2063/

Padam Lama

Hari Bahadur Ghising

Jahan Bdr Karki

FFS date Farmer Facilitator's

Name

ASC

Technician

2046-2054 in Sericulture 2057-2060 M. Sc. Stud Leave

HDO/ IPM Trainer : Bharat Bahadur Acharya


36/45

36

HDO/ IPM Trainer : Bharat Bahadur Acharya(IPM Training 2058, Vegetable)

FFS conductedbudget source FFS Location Crop FFS start date

PPD DADO SSMP

1 IPM FFS Vegs. Dolakha 1 * - - Bhimeshwor M-10 Cauliflower 2058-10

2 IPM FFS Vegs. Dolakha 1 - * - Bhimeshwor M-1 Cauliflower 2058-10

3 IPM FFS Vegs. Dolakha 1 * - - Bhimeshwor M-2 Cauliflower 2059-07



6 IPNS FFS Vegs Dolakha 1 - - * Bhimeshwor M-1 Cauliflower + Maize 2059-07



9 IPM FFS Vegs Ramechhap 1 - * - Ramechhap-4 Cauliflower 2062-07

10 IPM FFS Vegs Ramechhap 1 * - - Sukajor-9 Cauliflower 2063-04

S.N. Activities district Number

Benefits of IPM Adoption to


37/45

37

Benefits of IPM Adoption to

Farmers

Empowers farmers for field problem identification and agroecology analysis.

Helps farmers to judicially use pesticide based on insect

pest, disease or severity.

Social cooperation and understanding is increased.

Commercial farmers in pocket areas are more benefited. IPM brought awareness on their own friends, the "natural

enemies of insect pests, weeds and diseases".

f S


38/45

38

Experiences from IPM FFSSmall plot trials (simulation trials) helps progressivefarmers to design and test small farming problems on theiown field.

Due to balanced fertilizer use, proper doses andfrequency of pesticide use, quantity as well as quality ofagriculture produce is increased, farming cost is

decreased.

Conservation of natural enemies is enhanced.

Participants could diagnose field problems and solve it bythemselves.

Overall package of production practices helps farm

families to sustain their agriculture.

ISSUES OF IPM IMPLEMENTATION


39/45

39


IPM is an ecological approach to agriculture and needs mor

labour and understanding, which is in short supply even in thfarm families.

Educated family members do not want to continue agriculturoccupation; their parents guide their children to searc

occupations that are more rewarding.

Consumers have not focused their interests to get healthy ogood quality products. Therefore, there is no support to IPM.

There is no any social, moral or intellectual value of agricultur

from elite groups.

Different trainings, workshops, meetings, seminars arentertained nowadays, but the field allowance for IPM farme

facilitators are stagnant since a decade.



40/45

40


-----continued

Policy advocacy and reform initiative should come fromthose who actually use it.

Technology and policy generation centres such aAgricultural Colleges, NARC, Ministry of Agricultur

Ministry of Local Governance, etc should be guided bprogressive farmers and their trade associations; the

should not remain as passive adopters.

R d ti t i


41/45

41

Recommendations to improve

farming situations

All basic infrastructures such as land holding size,irrigation water, access to reasonably priced supplies androad networks, packaging and transportation discounts,access to free education and health services provided in

integrated way can sustain agriculture and farmingtradition. Farmers should be empowered to fix prices oftheir products, and they should not be compelled to selltheir products in compulsion or due to poverty.

Recommendations to improve IPM Adoption


42/45

42

Recommendations to improve IPM Adoption

Participants should all be commercial farmers, but maynot be available in such numbers required at one pocket.

Second FFS on another crop should be given to the same

group to increase learning habit (environment).

The FFS should be conducted on economically importantcrop, incorporating significant bottlenecks (more on rice?).

Farmer trainer him/her-self should be commercial farmer,& known for his/her performance in farming.

More than one FFS per week by a single IPM trainer maynot be so effective.

Facilitator allowance should be increased to Rs 600/week.

Adoption can not be enforced, facilitation may help it.

PROBLEMS ON IMPLEMENTING IPM


43/45

43

PROBLEMS ON IMPLEMENTING IPM

Farmers, students and school teachers want toparticipate the FFS on Saturdays when the IPMfacilitator is legally obliged to take rest.

When commercial pocket areas are far from eitherDADO or ASC offices, the IPM facilitator must be ready

to spent 2-3 days; 3-5 hours walk one way, each week iscertainly difficult.

Follow-up programs, such as monthly meetings, monthly

savings, or linkages with ASCs are poor. Professional videos on IPM / ICM / IDM / IPNS / ICWMP

are far better effective medium of communication for the

public, than the FFS, but are not created or are costly ornot available.


44/45

44

THANK YOU

SADO

DPA

HDO

Himganga VDC


45/45

45

THE END

nepal ipm review 2006

Documents