network rail possession indicator report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › poss… ·...

18
Network Rail Possession Indicator Report Period 12 2018/19

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jun-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

Network Rail Possession Indicator Report Period 12 2018/19

Page 2: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

2

Contents

Purpose ................................................................................................................... 3

Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 5

Dashboard ............................................................................................................... 6

1. Possession Disruption Index – Passenger (National) ......................................... 7

2. Possession Disruption Index – Freight (National) ............................................... 8

3. CPPP & EAS Disputes ........................................................................................ 9

4. Weekend Working Timetable Compliance ........................................................ 10

5. Rail Replacement Bus Hours ............................................................................ 11

6. Number of Planned Disruption Mitigation Interventions .................................... 12

7. Possession Notification Discount Factor ........................................................... 13

8. Late Changes to Possessions ........................................................................... 14

9. Delay Minutes Due to Possession Overrun per 100 Train Kilometre ................ 15

10. Cancellation Minutes Due to Possession Overrun Per 100 Train Kilometre... 16

11. Unplanned Temporary Speed Restrictions (TSR) .......................................... 17

APPENDIX 1 – Terms used in this report & accompanying notes ........................ 18

Page 3: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

3

Purpose The Possession Indicator Report (PIR) presents Network Rail’s performance against the regulatory Network Availability outputs set by the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) in the final determination for the Period covering 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2019 known as Control Period 5 (CP5). The PIR is published every four weeks and includes a series of other key disruption indicators. Structure of this report The PIR is structured under the headline measures shown in the Table below:

Metric Definition Purpose

1.Possession

Disruption Index

for passengers

Possession Disruption Index for

Passengers measures the

economic value of the impact of

possessions on excess journey

time as experienced by

passengers.

The measure aims to reduce the

disruption experienced by the

customer and is expressed as an

index (PDI values divided by the PDI

at the end of 2007/2008).

2. Possession

Disruption Index

for freight

The Possession Disruption

Index for Freight provides

network availability measures

the ‘availability’ of track for

freight use, weighted by the level

of freight traffic operated over

each section of track.

The measure aims to ensure that

freight services experience no

increase from 2007/8 levels of

disruptions resulting from engineering

works. The measure is expressed as

an indexed normalised by the MAA

for 2007/8.

3. CPPP & EAS

Disputes

The level of access disputes

escalated to the Access

Disputes Committee (ADC)

through the engineering access

planning process, or after the

Confirmed Period Possession

Plan.

This is a leading indicator. This

assess whether the access planning

processes are working as they

should.

4. Weekend

working

timetable

compliance

Working Time Table compliance

measures the percentage of

train schedules that ran as

scheduled or were disrupted

(cancelled or replaced by buses

vs. the permanent timetable)

each weekend by franchised

passenger train service

operators.

The measure provides visibility of the

levels of weekend timetable

compliance with a view to delivering a

90% compliance aspirational target.

5. Rail

replacement bus

hours (weekend)

Rail replacement bus hours

measure the percentage of train

schedules that ran and were

disrupted (cancelled or replaced

by buses vs. the permanent

timetable) per weekend, per

TOC.

The Rail replacement bus hours

measure provides an indication of the

extent of bus substitution at

weekends.

Regulatory metrics

Reg

ula

tory

ou

tpu

t

Keeping passengers on trains

Key

Per

form

ance

Ind

icat

ors

Page 4: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

4

6. Number of

planned

disruption

mitigation

interventions

(SLW, BiDi,

Simbids)

Measures the number of

adjacent line open interventions

planned to minimise the impact

of planned engineering work on

rail users.

The measure includes the number of

possessions planned with either bi-

directional signalling, single line

working or Simplified Bi-Directional

Signalling in operation to enable

trains to run during engineering work /

line blockages.

7a Notification

discount factor -

% Possessions

notified post TW-

22 Timetable

Possession Notification

Discount Factor measures the

percentage of disruptive

passenger possessions notified

in each of the three possession

notification bands.

The measure serves as an incentive

to plan possessions as far in advance

as possible. This helps passengers

plan their journey's better as fewer

changes are made to the published

timetable.

7b Notification

Discount Factor

by spend

Possession Notification

Discount Factor measures the

number of payments and spend

of disruptive passenger

possessions.

The measure serves as an incentive

to plan possessions as far in advance

as possible. This helps passengers

plan their journey's better as fewer

changes are made to the published

timetable.

8. Planned

disruption - Late

notice

possession

changes

Measures the number of new,

cancelled, curtailed or extended

disruptive possessions that were

agreed between the CPPP and

the WON as approved by the

Engineering Access Planning

unit (EAP).

It captures Network Rail driven

changes which have an additional

material impact that will be felt by the

travelling public and/or freight

customers (e.g. cancelled trains, re-

timings and diversions away from

stations), compared to what was

published in the Confirmed Period

Possession Plan (CPPP).

9. Delay

minutes due to

possession

overrun

The indicator is the delay

minutes per 100 train kilometre

run due to possession overrun.

The measure aims to provide a view

of the levels of passenger journeys

disruption resulting from extended

journey times due to overrunning

planned engineering works.

10. Cancellation

minutes due to

possession

overrun

The number of equivalent delay

minutes per 100 train kilometre

run caused by cancellations due

to possession overruns

The measure aims to provide a view

of the levels of passenger journeys

disruption resulting from cancelled

train services due to overrunning

planned engineering works.

11. Unplanned

temporary

speed

restrictions

(TSR)

The Unplanned TSRs measure

provides an indication of the

number of unplanned TSR’s in

place.

The measure aims to provide a view

of the disruptions to passenger

journeys resulting from unplanned

TSR.

Possession incidents

Key

Perfo

rman

ce In

dica

tors

Disruption mitigation

Key

Perfo

rman

ce In

dica

tors

Caveat The principal measures of the availability of the network to run trains are the Possession Disruption Indices for passenger (PDI-P) and freight (PDI-F). Following franchise changes in 2015, the Network Availability Reporting System (NARS) was unable to report PDI-P figures between April 2015 and February 2016. Throughout CP5 train service codes have been divided amongst service groups and subsequent weightings been re-distributed, adversely affecting the figures produced. PDI-P ended 2016/17 at 1.25 per cent, significantly higher than expected when the original forecasts for CP5 were made. However, service group changes resulting from changes to franchises mean that this out-turn is unreliable, not representative of our performance and not comparable with the regulatory targets that were set by the ORR before the start of the control period. We do not believe that PDI metrics are now a reliable indicator of network availability. Furthermore, PDI measures are not used by our business to inform possession planning decisions and we are further aware that PDI is not a measure that is valued by the industry. Following discussions with the ORR, we will continue to report PDI data until the end of CP5 for regulatory purposes, recognising that there are fundamental weaknesses in the measure. We have introduced two early warning indicators which we will monitor and publicly report (via our Annual Return), these are: i) level of access disputes raised and ii) additional information relating to the notification discount factor. These measures will more accurately monitor and track our ability to effectively plan possessions in line with industry processes and the impact they have on both industry and end users. We believe this will provide assurance to the industry in the absence of reliable PDI data. We consider that it is likely that the PDI-F calculation has similar issues to PDI-P.

Page 5: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

5

Executive Summary The Possession Disruption Index for Passengers (PDI-P) for Period 11 was 0.92, improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 1.18. The moving annual average for Period 11 was 1.20, again improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 1.47. Period 11 included major works north of Sheffield Major renewals in the Cricklewood area, Track Renewals and Maintenance Purley to Balcombe Tunnel Jn, maintenance work on the Northampton loop and Cardiff Central electrification works. NOTE: Possession Disruption index for Passenger is reported a period in arears. Please see caveat on page 4. The Possession Disruption Index for Freight (PDI-F) for Period 12 was 0.93, improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 1.10. The moving annual average for Period 12 was 0.97, again improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 1.00. Period 12 saw Freight services impacted by various planned engineering works including the first 12 days of a two 19-day blockades planned concurrently, one between Taunton and Exeter for Whiteball Tunnel Lining repairs, and the other between Totnes and Plymouth for track renewals work in Marley Tunnel. New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 13. The moving annual average for Period 12 for the total number of disputes open was 54, increasing when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 24. New EAS disputes raised in Period 12 was 13, increasing when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 0. The moving annual average for Period 12 for the total number of disputes open was 40, again increasing when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 38. The new disputes this period relate to holding disputes raised following the publication of the Engineering Access Statement for 2020 version 2. NOTE: Operators have 15 working days to lodge a dispute following the publication of Version 2 and Version 4 of the Engineering Access Statement. Therefore, disputes raised will be seen after these publications. The Weekend Working Timetable for Period 12 was 70.76%, deteriorating when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 73.30%. The moving annual average for Period 12 was 72.66%, again deteriorating when compared to the same period 2017/18 of 77.93%. Rail Replacement Bus Hours in Period 12 were 25,702 hours, improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 26,400 hours. The moving annual average for Period 12 was 19,754 hours, deteriorating when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 17,050 hours. Period 12 saw bus replacement service required due to the continuation of Great Western Electrification and Crossrail. Other engineering works necessitating the need for bus replacement services included Derby Station North Jn-Clay Cross Jn, Cardiff-Ebbw Vale Parkway, Bridgend- Swansea, Newport-Severn Tunnel, Exeter-Taunton and Paisley Gilmour Street-Kilwinning. Planned Disruption Mitigation Interventions in Period 12 were 146, increasing when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 133. The moving annual average for Period 12 was 129, decreasing when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 137. Possession Notification Discount Factor in Period 11 for possessions post TW-22 was 3.58%, improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 8.99%. The moving annual average for Period 11 was 11.16%, an adverse increase when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 7.52%. NOTE: Possession Notification Discount Factor is reported a period in arears. Late Change to Possessions for Period 12 was 112, improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 169. The moving annual average for Period 12 was 138, again improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 192. Period 12 included late Changes for Glasgow Central to install a new drainage system and for Queen Street and Aberdeen as part of the ongoing project works at both stations, Waverley Capacity improvement project and Great Western Electrification. Delay Minutes Due to Possession Overrun per 100 Train Kilometres in Period 12 was 0.015, improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 0.027. The moving annual average for Period 12 was 0.030, no change when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 0.030. Cancellation Minutes Due to Possession Overrun per 100 Train Kilometres in Period 12 was 0.005, improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 0.013. The moving annual average for Period 12 was 0.025, deteriorating improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 0.017. Unplanned Temporary Speed Restrictions for Period 12 were 231 increasing when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 195. The moving annual average in Period 12 was 236 again increasing when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 195.

Executive Summary

Page 6: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

6

Dashboard

Min Av. Max

** Possession Disruption Index for Passenger 1.20 1.47 0.70 1.10 1.53

Possession Disruption Index for Freight 0.97 1.00 0.85 0.94 1.06

Min Av. Max

CPPP Disputes Open 54 24 15 23 54

EAS Disputes Open 40 38 38 42 50

Weekend Working Timetable Compliance 72.66% 77.93% 72.66% 80.29% 84.33%

Rail Replacement Bus Hours 19754 17050 12133 15366 20264

Min Av. Max

Number of Planned Disruption Mitigation

Interventions (SLW, BiDi, Simbids)129 137 128 148 172

** Notification Discount Factor -%

Possessions Notified Post TW-22 Timetable 11.16% 7.52% 6.00% 8.25% 11.57%

Planned Disruption - Late Notice Possession

Changes1.65% 2.40% 0.93% 1.47% 2.40%

Min Av. Max

Delay Minutes Due to Possession Overrun 0.030 0.030 0.028 0.037 0.052

Cancellation Minutes Due to Possession

Overrun0.025 0.017 0.012 0.021 0.031

Unplanned Temporary Speed Restrictions 236 195 154 203 255

** metric reported a period in arrears

Possession incidents P12_18/19 MAAP12_17/18

MAA

13 period trend

(MAA)

Control period (MAA): CP5

Keeping passengers on trains P12_18/19 MAAP12_17/18

MAA

13 period trend

(MAA)

Control period (MAA): CP5

Disruption mitigation P12_18/19 MAAP12_17/18

MAA

13 period trend

(MAA)

Control period (MAA): CP5

Regulatory metrics P12_18/19 MAAP12_17/18

MAA

13 period trend

(MAA)

Control period (MAA): CP5

Dashboard

Page 7: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

7

1. Possession Disruption Index – passenger (National)

1. Possession Disruption Index – Passenger (National)

The Possession Disruption Index for Passengers (PDI-P) for Period 11 was 0.92, improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 1.18. The moving annual average for Period 11 was 1.20, again improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 1.47. Period 11 included major works north of Sheffield Major renewals in the Cricklewood area, Track Renewals and Maintenance Purley to Balcombe Tunnel Jn, Track renewal between Purley to Tattenham Corner/Caterham, Re-signalling works Keymer Jn/Falmer to Seaford/Berwick, Orpington Switches & Crossings (S&C) work, maintenance work on the Northampton loop, Kilsby tunnel work and Dorridge Freight loop lengthening. Passenger services were also impacted due to work Millom to Sellafield, Shrewsbury-Crewe, Preston to Blackpool, Kirkham Drainage Clarbeston Road-Milford Haven and Cardiff Central electrification works. East Coast mainline services were diverted via Cambridge due to S&C and Overhead Linework between Sandy and Peterborough, S&C renewal at Peterborough also saw some significant alterations to the train plan, access to Crofton Depot was limited due to rerailing going on between Crofton East Jn and Pontefract West Jn. Passenger service were impacted by rerailing and platform extensions between Haltwhistle and Petteril Bridge Jn. NOTE: Possession Disruption index for Passenger is reported a period in arears. Please see caveat on

page 4.

Page 8: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

8

On Disruption Index – freight (National)

2. Possession Disruption Index – Freight (National)

The Possession Disruption Index for Freight (PDI-F) for Period 12 was 0.93, improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 1.10. The moving annual average for Period 12 was 0.97, again improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 1.00. Period 12 saw Freight services impacted by various planned engineering works including the first 12 days of a two 19-day blockades planned concurrently, one between Taunton and Exeter for Whiteball Tunnel Lining repairs, and the other between Totnes and Plymouth for track renewals work in Marley Tunnel. Over the period there was restricted access to Derby RTC, Litchurch Lane works, Wellingborough Up Yard and Elstow sidings. Trains were diverted via Masborough and Barrow Hill with Hope valley services having to reverse at Chesterfield. A major bridge renewal closed the mainline into Immingham with limited traffic being diverted via the Grimsby light railway. S&C renewal at Peterborough affected some freight services that were required to use the March lines which had to retime around the end of the possession. Freight services were also impacted by work Balshaw Lane Jn to Preston, Sydney Bridge Jn to Sandbach South Jn, Preston to Blackpool, Millom to Sellafield, Allerton Jn & Liverpool South Parkway to Hunts Cross, Ardwick to Guide Bridge, Margam to Llanelli for Port Talbot Resignalling preparation work and electrification at Cardiff Central and at Newport. Fenny Compton freight loop lengthening resulted in freight not being able to use the loop and having to divert via West Coast mainline and the Western Route. Throughout the period significant amendments were made to freight services in the Southampton area as part of the Southampton freight upgrade programme. Unfortunately, primarily due to safety related issues, many of these works were not successfully completed during the period and will now need to be undertaken at a later date.

Page 9: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

9

3. CPPP & EAS Disputes

New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 13. The moving annual average for Period 12 for the total number of disputes open was 54, increasing when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 24. New EAS disputes raised in Period 12 was 13, increasing when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 0. The moving annual average for Period 12 for the total number of disputes open was 40, again increasing when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 38. The new disputes this period relate to holding disputes raised following the publication of the Engineering Access Statement for 2020 version 2. NOTE: Operators have 15 working days to lodge a dispute following the publication of Version 2 and Version 4 of the Engineering Access Statement. Therefore, disputes raised will be seen after these publications.

Page 10: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

10

6. Weekend working timetable compliance

4. Weekend Working Timetable Compliance

The Weekend Working Timetable for Period 12 was 70.76%, deteriorating when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 73.30%. The moving annual average for Period 12 was 72.66%, again deteriorating when compared to the same period 2017/18 of 77.93%.

Page 11: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

11

6. Rail replacement b

Rail Replacement Bus Hours in Period 12 were 25,702 hours, improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 26,400 hours. The moving annual average for Period 12 was 19,754 hours, deteriorating when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 17,050 hours. Period 12 saw planned engineering works requiring bus replacement services to operate which included: – -Chiltern Railways required bus replacement services to operate due to the South Ruislip-High Wycombe block. -CrossCountry required bus replacement services to operate between Peterborough and Ely, Bournemouth-Eastleigh, Manchester Piccadilly-Crewe, Crewe-Stockport, Penzance-Truro, Cardiff Central-Newport, Dundee-Aberdeen, Exeter-Plymouth, Newport-Severn Tunnel and Exeter-Taunton. -c2c required bus replacement services to operate due to engineering works between Grays-Barking, Barking-Pitsea via Tilbury Loop and Upminster-Grays. -East Midlands Trains required bus replacement services to operate due to engineering works Derby Station North Jn & Clay Cross Jn, Chesterfield South Jn & Masborough Jn, Brightside Station Jn & Holmes Jn, March & Kings Dyke, Kettering South Jn & Wigston North Jn, Leicester South Jn & Silbey Jn and Leicester South Jn & Syston North Jn. -Govia Thameslink Railway required bus replacement services to operate due to engineering works Sole Street-Rainham, Sevenoaks-Chislehurst, Nunhead Jn-Slade Green, Keymer Jn/Falmer-Polegate/Lewes, Oxted-Uckfield/East Grinstead ,Bricklayers Arms Jn-Windmill Bridge Jn, North Kent East Jn-Slade Green, Three Bridges-Preston Park, Shalford Jn-Havant Jn, Ashford-Ore, Dartford Jn-Maidstone West, Courthill Loop North Jn-Hayes, Ashford-Canterbury West, Paddock Wood-Maidstone West, Charing Cross-Courthill Loop South Hither Green Jn-Petts Wood Jn, Falcon Jn-Mitre Bridge and a Balcombe blockade. -Greater Anglia required bus replacement services to operate between Ingatestone-Southend, Victoria-Newbury Park, Witham-Newbury Park, Southend Victoria/ Southminster and Newbury Park, Hertford East-Bishops Stortford, Liverpool Street-Stansted airport, Ely-Peterborough, March-Peterborough, Broxbourne-Bishops Stortford, Ipswich-Felixstowe, Colchester and Ipswich, Colchester/Manningtree and Ipswich, Norwich and Lowestoft, Great Yarmouth-Sheringham and Beccles-Lowestoft, -Great Western Railway required bus replacement services due to the continuation of Great Western Electrification and Crossrail. Other works during the period requiring bus replacement services included Gloucester Commissioning Work, Westbury area track maintenance, Barnstaple branch various work, Penzance/St Ives track maintenance and patrolling, Whiteball and Marley Tunnel work and Timber work in the Evesham area. -London Overground required rail replacement road services to operate Highbury-Islington-Stratford, Clapham Junction and Richmond/Kew Bridge, London Bridge-West Croydon via Sydenham and Crystal Palace, Sydenham to Norwood Jn, Camden Road-Stratford and East London line services between Highbury and Dalston Jn, and South Tottenham-Barking. -Northern required bus replacement services to operate between Halifax-Todmorden, Bradford-Hebden Bridge, Bradford-Huddersfield and Halifax-Bradford. -Merseyrail required bus replacement services to operate due to the platform interface scheme for new fleet. -ScotRail required rail replacement road services to operate between Paisley Gilmour Street-Kilwinning, Ladybank- Dundee and Leuchars-Dundee Central Jn. -Southeastern had various planned engineering work which required bus replacement services to operate Ashford to Rye, Bromley South to Orpington, Chislehurst to Sevenoaks, Clapham Jn and Richmond/Kew Bridge, Dartford to Rochester, Faversham to Ramsgate, Hastings to Ashford, Ebbsfleet International, Ashford International to Canterbury West, Lewisham and Orpington, Lewisham to Dartford via Greenwich & Woolwich, Strood to Maidstone West, New Cross to Dartford via Lewisham and Bexleyheath, Orpington to Sevenoaks, Paddock Wood to Maidstone West, Sittingbourne to Sheerness-on-Sea and Strood & Meopham to Rainham. -South Western Railway had various planned engineering work which required bus replacement services to operate between Andover-Salisbury, Ascot-Staines, Bournemouth-Southampton Central, Brockenhurst-Lymington Pier, Clapham Jn-Kew Bridge,Eastleigh-Poole,Epsom-Dorking,Guildford-Portsmouth,Hounslow-Staines,Leatherhead-Effingham Jn, Portsmouth-Woolston, Reading-Staines, Salisbury-Yeovil Jn, Shepperton-Teddington, Southampton-Fareham,Staines-WeybridgeSurbiton-WokingTeddington-Shepperton,Virginia Water-Hounslow and Woking-Fleet. -Transport for Wales required bus replacement services to operate between Cardiff and Ebbw Vale Parkway, Bridgend and Swansea, Ebbw Vale Town and Newport/Cardiff, and Clarbeston Road and Milford Haven. -TFL required rail replacement road services to operate between Ingatestone/Southend & Newbury Park, Witham & Newbury Park, Shenfield & Southend Victoria, Stratford & Camden Road, Barking & Walthamstow and Watford Jn & Harrow & Wealdstone.

5. Rail Replacement Bus Hours

Page 12: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

12

7. Number of planned disruption mitigation interventions

Planned Disruption Mitigation Interventions in Period 12 were 146, increasing when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 133. The moving annual average for Period 12 was 129, decreasing when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 137.

6. Number of Planned Disruption Mitigation Interventions

Page 13: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

13

8. Possession notification discount factor

7. Possession Notification Discount Factor

Possession Notification Discount Factor in Period 11 for possessions post TW-22 was 3.58%, improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 8.99%. The moving annual average for Period 11 was 11.16%, an adverse increase when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 7.52%.

NOTE: Possession Notification Discount Factor is reported a period in arears.

Page 14: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

14

9. Late changes to possessions

8. Late Changes to Possessions

Late Change to Possessions for Period 12 was 112, improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 169. The moving annual average for Period 12 was 138, again improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 192. Period 12 included late Changes for Glasgow Central to install a new drainage system and for Queen Street and Aberdeen as part of the ongoing project works at both stations, Waverley Capacity improvement project and Great Western Electrification.

Page 15: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

15

10. Delay minutes due to possession overrun per 100 train kilometre

9. Delay Minutes Due to Possession Overrun per 100 Train Kilometre

Delay Minutes Due to Possession Overrun per 100 Train Kilometres in Period 12 was 0.015, improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 0.027. The moving annual average for Period 12 was 0.030, no change when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 0.030.

Page 16: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

16

11. Cancellation minutes due to possession overrun per 100 train kilometre

10. Cancellation Minutes Due to Possession Overrun per 100 train Kilometre

Cancellation Minutes Due to Possession Overrun per 100 Train Kilometres in Period 12 was 0.005, improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 0.013. The moving annual average for Period 12 was 0.025, deteriorating improving when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 0.017.

Page 17: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

17

12. Unplanned temporary speed restrictions (TSR)

11. Unplanned Temporary Speed Restrictions (TSR)

Unplanned Temporary Speed Restrictions for Period 12 were 231 increasing when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 195. The moving annual average in Period 12 was 236 again increasing when compared to the same period in 2017/18 of 195.

Page 18: Network Rail Possession Indicator Report › wp-content › uploads › 2019 › 04 › Poss… · New CPPP disputes raised in Period 12 were 10, a decrease when compared to the same

18

APPENDIX 1

Terms used in this report