neuro - evidence based managerial judgementsjournalstd.com/gallery/44-sep2019.pdf · the mind and...

NEURO - EVIDENCE BASED MANAGERIAL

JUDGEMENTS

Dr J. Satpathy and Professor Sebastián Laza

Post – Doctoral Researcher, Department of Business Management Fakir Mohan University, Balasore

India

MA, MBA, National University of La Plata, Duke University, National Research University Copenhagen Business University

National University of Cuyo, Argentina

New brain imaging technologies have motivated neuro - managerial science studies of the internal order of the mind and its links with the continuum of managerial (humanoid) judgements from judgement making

among fixed gambles to judgement making mediated by market and other institutional rules. We are only at the beginning of the enterprise, but its promise suggests a fundamental change in how we think, observe and

model judgement in all its contexts.

…….. Vernon Smith

Abstract

Principal transformation commences with intellectual data management. Is there a problem with judgement making? Are trade leaders being threatened by forces of globalisation? Is there an ‘alarm’? Mankind, in general, and managers in (algorithmic) managerial world, in specific, assumes that (algorithmic) judgements they take are rational, optimal and based on best available data. They presume that they are in total command of judgemental behaviours and satisfy that the end - judgement is in fact the best judgement. Such propositions are now being examined under lens of neuro - cellular and molecular genetics. Issues like how judgemental processes transgress in brain pathways, how brain considers sources of information before judgement, what are the intrinsic processes by which entities reach judgements have that often embody conflicting values have been investigated to design ‘rational’ judgements. In a setting of incomprehensible (algorithmic) judgement, how characters engross in tactical explanations of judgement problems are being answered in a managerial judgement platform of cognito - underpinnings. In spite of cognito - judgemental hybrid attempts, there are unaddressed issues in managerial judgement perception. This paper attempts at addressing contributions of how cognito research could be used to explore managerial (algorithmic) judgement making. Attempt comprises porticoes of biological basis of preferences via. cognito - instruments. This paper offers fabric of a cognitomanagerial ‘modulator-demodulator’ to answer issues in data - transmission from (sustainable trade) milieu to managerial mind and vice versa in managerial judgement making dynamics. Paper intends to help Industrial 7.0 managers (introducing futuristic concept of ‘Judgemental 7.0’ for the first time in management literature) develop judgment in judgement skills. Conclusion is sound and justified in that judgement making of a manager are linked to biological aspects.

Key Words: Neuro - Judgement, Neuro - cellular and Molecular Genetics, Judgemental 7.0’

Managers and Cognito - Instrument(s)

Science, Technology and Development

Volume VIII Issue IX SEPTEMBER 2019

ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 357

Introduction

“The human being makes decisions in a context of limited rationality, subject to biases and noises that lead

him to behave sub optimally, from the point of view of what Neoclassical Economics prescribes. Behavioral

Economics has been showing this phenomenon for decades, with the nominees Simon, Kahneman and Thaler as

main banners”.

.... Sebastian Laza (Neuroeconomics: The Disruptive Path, Amazon KDP, 2018)

Businesses are crossing through impassable hexes and germination unremittingly in hyper

‘scuffle’ situation. Attention is on forces of globalization that have ‘emotional’ impact on

circumstance, reflected as ‘constant’. Judgement making is a routine activity for any human being.

Judgement making is a vivacious fragment of commercial domain (‘information - based’) and any

other field of humanoid striving. All managers are mandated to perform tasks that are primarily

emblematic and ceremonial in character. Judgement making is at heart of managerial motion.

Managers have to render the role of an entrepreneur, ‘disruption’ supervisor, ‘means’ allocators and

‘mediators’. As organisations grapple with sub - terrane and central transformation crossways

business décor, how must they concoct to yield judgements that are pertinent, effectual and

operative? Noticeable and testable (‘information - based’), with dominance of human element,

managerial judgemental instinct is complex and ever - shifting beset with ‘judgemental friction’.

What to produce, how to produce, when to produce and for whom to produce are no more the

central problems of micro / macro / business or managerial economics. All these seek academic

refuge under the umbrella of 7.0 managerial judgemental spectrums. 7.0 managerial judgemental

embraces concept of post - ‘virtual judgemental’ modeling in business transactions. Can

neuromanagement offer insights into behavioural judgement making process?

Diversification of managerial judgemental activities has become order of 2st Century management

edifice. Nonetheless, in current epochs, comprehensive science data has been put in uncertainty.

This is on account of ‘Augmented Reality’ (knowledge that overlays simulated doppelgänger on

manager's interpretation of factual domain), ‘Artificial Intelligence’ (mental power validated by

apparatuses), ‘Internet of Things’ (interlinking via Internet of calculating expedients entrenched in

commonplace substances, aiding to direct and obtain information), ‘Cloud’, ‘rational configuring’

and ‘Big data’ management (organisation, management and ascendancy of enormous tomes of

designed and amorphous information) apparatuses. This is moderately triggered by assortment of

foundations and philosophy of methodical evidence. There ought to be a judicious mix of ‘positivity’

and ‘normativity’ in ambit of ‘apparatus of mind’. This conceives concept of ‘Judgemental Ought’ by

maneuvering philosopher’s ‘instinct’. Managerial science and management is more than a value

modeling or optimisation calculus attempt towards path of judgement making. Industrial and

commercial entities are engulfed in a myriad of definitions and connotations. Organisations are

encountering rough times in planning strategies towards applying tenets of economics and

managerial sciences to real business activities. And, some do not conduct ‘as usual’ trade. All

assume that they are the ‘best’ judgement deciders. Whatever judgement one takes is assumed to be



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 358

a judgement taken by all means based on ‘cogent’ and ‘rational’ technique (concept of ‘Strong’ and

‘weak’ ordering under locus). Which alleyway a commercial venture will yield and where that path

will (‘information - based’) prime it, is contingent on all - encompassing assortment of judgements

made by managers in managerial edifice. There is no exemption about that. When it comes to

sustainable trade organisations, judgement making is a practice and process, as well. Managers

today are witness to ‘accelerated rate of change’ in 7.0 continuums. Operational and accurate

judgements bring profit and non-accurate ones embrace losses. Therefore, in all ‘information - based’

organisations, judgement making process is a critical process. Under this process, organisations

choose optimum course of action from best available possible substitutions.

Judgement making is as timeworn as evolution. Judgement making has been baptised a

penetrating crossbreed - scholarship of cognito - science, information science, cognitive science and

managerial management. Major competition for comparative advantage (edge) as regards cost and

quality has beset production management. Data leads to knowledge. Knowledge is power. Power

dictates calibrations in competitive advantage and competitive edge. Both form pillars of

‘Intellectual Property’. (Algorithmic) judgements are part and parcel of each living being. On a

philosophical annotation, what are minds and brains for? Complex of all organs in a living being,

brain has been putative as ‘power house’ of human body in faunal kingdom. How is it that much of

(algorithmic) judgemental activities are through dynamics of brain only? This is a question that has

been perplexing researchers, scientists and philosophers. This debate, notwithstanding (cognito)

scientific advances offers alleyways for exploring how brain creates phenomenal, unique and

contemplative (algorithmic) judgements from complexly interlinked linkage - web. There is an

undebatable need to reconnoiter as to how brain absorbs, recognises and frames problematic

situations from information to stimulate apposite responses. In such a scenario (sustainable trade

scenario), there is imperative need to register sustainable trade endure - ability during sustainable

trade 7.0. This is because arrangement of ‘cognito - managerial’ transformation in commercial

markets (‘transformation’) rationally characterise sustainable commercial transformation in distinct

frameworks.

‘Industrial 7.0’ Managers

The birth of Neuroeconomics has created one of those rare historical moments in which

economists stop to reflect on the fundamental questions of our science: the interdisciplinarity of

the approaches to the economic problem, the frontiers of the economy, its objectives, questions of

validity or refutation of theories, among others. Technical and industrial progressions endure to

cultivate at an implausible swiftness. The next industrial resurgence targets to transport back

anthropological soupçon. Change is unpredictable with transmissions in universal mandate,

hybridized comportment and tactical judgement making proposing alternative methods to chiseling

improbability. Industrial 7.0 manager’s style judgements grounded on archetypes that proceed from

outmoded reasonableness and evidence dispensation representations. Business judgements

prerequisite to espouse ‘real time’ of fluctuations prospective to transpire for a ‘gap’ sandwiched



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 359

between previous considerations and forthcoming transformation. Cognitivism advocates that

business judgements surface on partiality arrangement; what stroke to take, what appearances of

substitutions make judgement problematic, how contradictions generate projections and

experiments in behavioural judgement making etc. How do managers engage to sustain behavioural

judgement regulator? Industrial capitals will be accomplished by high-tech schemes, managers will

move from a mammon founded system to a neuro - cellular need philosophy and artificial

intelligence models will manage resources, drive and technical activities to thoroughgoing

competence. Managerial inventiveness and perceptions will be shared at light rapidity universally.

Fresh neuro - based soundings potential succors to apprehend managerial judgement making at

behavioral and neural stratums. It is conceivable to take present tendencies and reason where

managers will be going.

Aim

Aim of paper is to address how cognito research could be used to explore (algorithmic) judgement

among ‘Judgemental 7.0 managers via facets of biological basis of preferences.

Judgemental Arrangement

Management is considered to harbour three dimensions; ‘Technical’, ‘Conceptual’ and ‘Human’.

(Algorithmic) judgement is observed to be some form of a tenacity to conduct in a particular mode.

Naivest reason offered for is that it involves some sort of a choice or predilection / preference and is

an obligation to that choice or predilection / preference. There is a need to understand, predict and

control judgement dynamics in managerial behaviour. Whereas judgement model concentrates on

how to makes choices amongst substitutions, it recompenses little or no attention to how one

classifies obtainable substitutions or how goal often stimuluses what those accessible substitutions

will be. It is a truism that currently ‘data-driven’ judgement making landscape is encouraging

organisations to adopt a metamorphosis from contemporary to transformation routes thereby

compelling sustainable trades to alter core practicalities of (algorithmic) judgement making. To

reconnoiter such newfangled prospects in managerial data science, sustainable trade dynamics in its

universal arrangement have escorted changes in judiciously controlled laboratory settings.

Reviews

Each manager in modern business world is guided by his own judgemental interests. One guiding

factor is the profit maximising behaviour of the commercial firms. Manager possibly chooses that

alternative wherein the possibility of utility maximisation is assumingly highest. This obeys the

‘logical hierarchy of ordering’. Ab initio, it seems prudent to state the marginal preference model

proposed by Armstrong. The model states that with reference to uncertainty and indifference, the

manager never christens his choice of a preference as ‘sure prospect’. The manager may resort to



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 360

‘preference intensity’. Bernouli model offers the prospect of a manager opting for a larger gain to

compensate for the risk of a given loss.

Reviews of literature and models lead to the observation that earlier studies have explored

connection between wide-ranging reasoning capabilities and (algorithmic) judgement making. Few

have categorized precise cognitive abilities underlying judgement making ability. Interpreting brain

- setting communications requires mechanical considerations of biological processes that implement

value-dependent project (algorithmic) judgement making. There appears to be a crucial dissimilarity

between ‘thinking about thinking’ and actually enhancing brain and mental processes by developing

latent potential of each individual. Reviews indicate that there are four distinct ‘Pillars’ around

which the entire perimeter of (algorithmic) judgement making appears to have a protoplasmic

concentration. These are; ‘deciding to decide’, ‘deciding to choose, ‘choosing to ‘decide’ and

‘choosing to choose’. Theoretical explanations hypothesize that brain undertakes this through

sequence of neural computations. In such a situation, expected future reward options are compared

and the option with highest expected value is designated. If brain is compared to a computing

device, a crucial aspect is crucially missing. Human beings delineate goals for information

processing. Goals for brains are determined by need for survival in uncertain and competitive

settings (VUCA). Principal issues dealt are how to handle brains behind sustainable trades in

‘sustainable trade (Judgemental 7.0’), ‘Age of Dramatic Change’ and ‘Growing Uncertainty’? What

then are comprehensible brain dynamics underlying prediction, control and judgement making?

‘Judgement making is an abstract term referring to the process of selecting a specific option among a set of substitutions expected to create various outcomes. Accordingly, they can be used to describe a very wider range of behaviours, ranging from various unineuro - cellular organisms to complex political behaviours in human society. Until recently, two different approaches have subject the studies of judgement making. On believe that, a normative or prescriptive approach focus the question of what is the best or optimal choice for a given type of judgement -making problem. For example, the principle of utility maximization in economics and the concept of equilibrium in the game theory describe how self-interested rational agents should behave individually or in a group, respectively. An significant lesson from cognito - biological research on judgement making is that actions are chosen through coordination among multiple brain systems, each implementing a distinct set of computational algorithms’ (Dayan et al., 2006).

‘Technology has had a spectacular impact on the practice of human resources in various fields, and its impact

is extremely fast increasing. In-spite of that small research has done on how to apply information systems and human-computer interaction principles to designing human resource information systems. In this paper, authors focus more closely on the role that the interface between the computer and human play in the success of electronic human resource management. Specifically, we a) briefly review the individual requirements of several eHRM functions (e.g., e-recruiting, e-selection, e-learning, e-compensation/ benefits), b) consider how an understanding of human computer interaction can facilitate the success of these systems, c) reviews research on technical issues associated with eHRM, and d) highlight how applying HCI principles can increase their operation. As per the study success of eHRM depends heavily on the interface between the computer and the user (e.g., applicant, employee, manager). The design of the interfaces that support HR practices and help overcome the challenges of competing tasks and interacting with others online should lead to more successful eHRM outcomes. Scholars from the fields of information systems and human resources have come together



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 361

with the goal of investigating how one can apply IS and HCI theories to the HR context to develop more robust and operational HRIS’ (Richard D. Johnson)

Steps

Managers can foresee future, identify steps, calibrate and calculate magnitudes, consequences and

adopt ‘motion - oriented’ measures. Following are steps of judgement making process. Each may be

supported by different instruments and techniques.

Phase 1: Identification of purpose in 7.0 managers’ judgement

Phase 2: Information congregation by 7.0 managers’

Phase 3: Principles for judging substitutions by 7.0 managers’

Phase 4: Brainstorm and analyse different choices by 7.0 managers’

Phase 5: Selection of best substitute by 7.0 managers’

Phase 6: Execution of judgement by 7.0 managers’

Phase 7: Evaluation of results by 7.0 managers’

Cognito Perspectives

Brain is not augmented for signing judgements. Brain is constantly subjected to tastes, beliefs,

choices, preferences and cognitive palates of any individual. Brains do not aid in judgement making

based on characteristic significance but what they propose beyond other probable schemes. While

making or contemplating judgements, one generally swings back and forth amongst substitutions,

towards gathering support for each alternative in a manner that purportedly seems to be driven by

attention. How to optimise judgement making? This is a clear case of ‘attentional drift diffusion’.

Catecholaminergic cognito - cadence (collection of cognitions in central nervous system) is critical

for numerous aspects of behaviour Size of brain is dictated by the cerebral cortex, Special reference is

towards the set of frontal lobes that are associated with executive functions i.e. (algorithmic)

managerial judgement making. The continuum of cerebral cortex is functionally oriented towards

(managerial) vision.

Imaging studies offer the hypothesis that differences in cognito and (algorithmic) managerial

judgement making behaviour (might) relate to differences in cerebral cortex connectivity. Perceptive

the coverage to which two brains can differ is crucial in basic cognito - science research. Coupled up

with the above, it has been clinically evinced that dopamine, a functional and an operative cognito -

transmitter, renders an important role in encrypting managerial preferences. Cognito - management,

as a crossbreed discipline of behavioural economics and neural activity, pursues to explicate

judgement making, ability to route substitutions and indicate optimal course of action. It explores

how (algorithmic) judgement making managerial behaviour contour understanding of brain and

chaperon comprehensible brain geometry in the track of (algorithmic) judgement making? These

attempts to reconnoiter the above dynamics to put forward a model for cognito management



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 362

judgement, in which interface are addressed through calibrations of cognitional motion in brain.

Attempt provisions abstract geometry, to enrich and inform, for steering cognito (managerial)

algorithmic research at juncture of cognito (managerial) science and offers raises vital issues towards

search for a solution through measurements of cognitional motion in brain at management levels of

analysis.

Why does judgement making differ? Judgement making, is based on sensory information and

value. Genes impact judgement making viewed as cognitive progression causing selection of belief

or course of action among possibilities. Developments in information tools and progresses in socio -

genetics are contemporaneous challenges to judgement managers. Socio - genetic instruments are

multifaceted and encompass uncertainties. It is significant that certain managers do not arrange for

anomalous responses. These managers prefer to opt for alternatives that presumably command

higher expected utility. There thus appears to be a judgemental ‘illusion’ thereby reflecting a mental

state of ‘perhaps rational.’ All these pose possibility that managers will not be ‘informed’ enough to

facilitate good informed consent in judgement-making (Satpathy, J. et. al.; 2018). Advances in inter -

related biological sciences, management, philosophy, genetics, heredity, medicine and related

disciplines are shepherding an era of ‘custom-made preclusion’. This allows for exceptional

exactitude in scheming cautious thought and testing in judgement making. Key enquiries arise

about how judgement aids optimally present information. Some queries relate to how data should

be manageable to enlighten choices. This implies that hard-wired genetic stimuluses play role in

determining judgements. Judgement philosophies, as analysis of behaviour of managers facing

nonstrategic uncertainty, are scarce to date wherein interest in and use of genetic designs is

increasing. ‘Genetic locus’ is the construct that combines multiple aspects (Satpathy and Mishra;

2018).

Neuro - cellular and molecular genetics of any organisation dictate and decide the structure and

function of organisational functional and operational ‘gene(s)’. Stochasticity (pigeonholed by

haphazard, fortuitous or likelihood) saturates judgement making at neuro - cellular level. During

organisational operational cell variation procedure, operational ‘gene(s)’ of the organisation ‘gene(s)’

get turned on or downcast, contingent on what type of operational ‘gene(s)’ the precursor

organisational gene is attempting to assume managerial brain cells receive stochastic signs, execute

recognition and exhibit spatiotemporal vacillation with stochastic mechanisms and breed and

decease in organisational settings. Predominant philosophy in cognito - science embraces that

individuals brand judgements based on assimilated universal designs that ensue inside frontal

cortex of brain. Judgemental 7.0 is presently a key carter for transformation in sustainable trade and

organisations. Cognito – managerial transformation aids in process enhancement, optimisation and

graduated calibration Managers make judgements in a context of limited rationality. This is subject

to biases and noises. These lead him to behave in a sub - optimal manner that is a deviation from

what is prescribed by neoclassical managerial economics. Behavioural Economics has been

exhibiting this phenomenon for decades which was not recognised then. Contemporary day

sustainable trade of (algorithmic) managerial judgement making has become progressively



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 363

multifaceted and fiercely competitive. This is primarily because of ‘seen’ and ‘unforeseen’

forces of globalisation that still revolves around pillars of ‘ competitive edge’ and

‘competitive advantage’. Each and every organisation today is confronted with multi -

dimensional trials bordering from in what way to engross multiple cohorts to allocating

impression of ‘cognito - managerial’ transformation. So how do managers manage this intricacy

and convolution?

A judgement depends on how uncertain the judgement deciders are. Judgement making

stratagems are contingent on the degree, span, depth and intensity of ‘uncertainty’ element in

package of data being presented. Some substantial facets of (algorithmic) managerial judgement

making integrates dynamics of judgement under umbrella of close -

possibility,likelihood, likeliness, prospect, anticipation, fortuitous, odds, opportunity, risk,

forfeiture or repugnance and inter - temporal choice, corroboration learning and

organisational conformity. This may and perhaps does include quintessence of

hyperactive scanning and cross cognito - feedback. Setting of cognitive processes

engaged in obtaining and dispensation of information in judgement making represents

range of cognito - scientific knowledge in managerial and cognito - commercial design;

via fMRI (measurements of cerebral activity by spotting fluctuations concomitant with blood flow),

EEG (trajectories and records of brain movement patterns) and eye ‘tracking’ (computing point

of gaze where one is looking or motion of eye relative to head). In this context, enquiries that need

to be answered include:

Why (algorithmic) judgement dynamics making process differs?

What is the cognito scientific analysis behind it?

What makes organisations to choose a particular response not others?

How to choose in threatening circumstances where vulnerabilities are high?

How to choose when there are multiple incompatible objectives?

How to deal with risks and uncertainties in (algorithmic) judgement dynamics?

How to create options better than ones initially?

How to become better (algorithmic) judgement dynamics deciders?

What resources to be endowed in (algorithmic) judgement dynamics - making?

Cognito - Prototype

Managers make (managerial) algorithmic managerial judgements in complex situations. Cognito -

managerial judgement making needs a judgement decider (Manager) responsible for managerial

judgement making. This decider has substitutions and must choose ‘best alternative’ (or ‘optimised’

combination). When made, events may have occurred (decider has no control). Each (combination)

of substitutions, followed by an event, leads to some quantifiable significance. Cognitive cognito -

science research suggests that diverse preference orderings and judgements possibly will surface

depending on which brain circuits are activated. This perchance contradicts micro - managerial



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 364

postulate that one complete preference ordering provides sufficient information to predict

judgement and behaviour.

Specific brain structure potentiates cognitomanagerial (algorithmic) judgement making depending

on stratagem, behaviours and agenda. Consequently, cognitomanagerial (algorithmic) judgement

making is reasoning or emotional processes which can either be rational or irrational. This is based

on explicit / tacit assumptions. Such a situation leads to formulation of ‘cognito - cognitomanagerial

(algorithmic) judgement making scenario. Explorations juxtapose link between brain and behaviour

to project cognitional activities, linkage - web between cognitions, plasticity of brain and relationship

between brain and behaviour. These inherit methods as how brain scrambles, processes information,

stores representation in mind to craft actions in reaction to stimuli. Pathway embraces sensation and

perception, interface linking data in dissimilar modalities, matrix of memory and dispensation of

data. Deduction is grounded on postulation that cognitive functions is based on neural activities in

brain.

What does ‘Judgemental 7.0’ bring to (algorithmic) cognito - judgement making

process? Presumably, ‘Judgemental 7.0’ brings to (algorithmic) cognito - judgement making process

a set of refined and testable data ‘pillar’ diagonally across functionalities and operable domains.

How is (algorithmic) data cast in organisational development interstellar continuum and

commercial inter - galactic continuum? What (algorithmic) judgements are made in development

interstellar continuum vs commercial inter - galactic continuum? Are development interstellar

continuum and commercial inter - galactic continuum (algorithmic) data - concentrated? Are

(algorithmic) organisational development interstellar continuum and commercial inter - galactic

continuum data models analogous or diverse? How much (algorithmic) development interstellar

continuum and commercial inter - galactic continuum data cascaded is used in judgement - making?

How do development interstellar continuum and commercial inter - galactic continuum data and

conviction notify judgement making process? Consistency properties are internal to

cognitomanagerial (algorithmic) judgement function that describes behaviour. Samuelson’s revealed

preference formulation is methodically more suitable (since) if individual’s behaviour is consistent,

then it is possible to explain behaviour with reference to judgement behaviour. Sen (2002) identifies

‘internal consistency’ approach and ‘self-interest pursuit’ approach, respectively. Internal

consistency model explains behaviour by finding regularities in experiential behaviour that enable

to assess consistency without reference to anything other than (or external to) observed (algorithmic)

managerial behaviour. In order to envisage cognito - managerial (algorithmic) judgements. Added

approach is ‘self-interest pursuit’ approach. It is assumed that self-interest, represented by complete

preference ordering, dominates all motivations in coherent matrix. ‘Rational’ (algorithmic)

behaviour comprises of pursuit of self-interest. This provides basis for application of utility theory in

coherent analysis which represents chooser’s preferences and explains how preferences determine

cognitomanagerial (algorithmic) judgements. Internal consistency is neither sufficient nor necessary

condition of cognitomanagerial (algorithmic) judgement. It is not sufficient because ‘[a] manager

who always chooses things he values least and hates most would have great consistency of



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 365

behaviour. There may be rational (algorithmic) engagements but where axiomatic conditions of

consistency of behaviour would not obtain. Internal (intrinsic) psychological structure of manager

may be affected by conflicting motivations, values or goals. Each corresponds to different ordering

and interacting in a way that precludes emergence of internally consistent (algorithmic) preference

ordering. External (extrinsic) factors may influence cognitomanagerial (algorithmic) judgement

based on ‘menu-dependence’. Changes may modify attitude towards other elements thereby

changing preference ordering. These contravene axiomatic conditions of internal consistency which

require that orderings must be independent from external conditions. Appreciation of ‘(algorithmic)

data operational judgements’ compared to ‘data-aided judgements’ leverages ‘Judgemental 7.0’

(algorithmic) cognito - judgement making.

(Algorithmic) judgement models propose bounded rationality as basic problem in (algorithmic)

judgement-making in a complex environ. Thus, an option exists by optimisation stratagem under

given constraints or heuristics solutions. Both support idea of dual processing which distinguishes

between automated processing and analytic reasoning. Usage depends on saliency of incoming

stimuli and availability of resources. With signature reference to (algorithmic) judgement making,

managers may be able to make squandering choices with limited information and limited cognitive

resources. From cognito - scientific standpoint, evidence supports bipartite processing schemes with

differing attributes. Depending on judgement task, occipital, parietal, and temporal areas, cortical

areas, lateral and medial prefrontal cortexes are observed to be activated during (algorithmic)

judgement-making tasks. Some algorithmic cognito - prototypes that ‘Judgemental 7.0’ could

do well to adopt are listed below:-

Functional MRI (fMRI): Functional magnetic resonance imaging measures brain activity by

detecting associated changes in blood flow. Methodology focuses (‘information - based’) on

(algorithmic) judgements under uncertainty and relies on either a rapid intuitive, automated or a

slower rational processing scheme.

Magneto Encephalography (MEG): Magneto Encephalography is for mapping (‘information -

based’) brain activity by recording magnetic produced by electrical currents occurring naturally in

brain over a period of time.

Electro - Encephalo - Graphy (EEG): Electroencephalography (EEG) is used to record

(‘information - based’) electrical activity of brain along the scalp.

Positron Emission Tomography (PET): Positron Emission Tomography is used to obtain a 3D

image of functional processes in brain.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS): Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation is used to stimulate

small regions of brain.

Eye ‘Tracking’: Eye ‘tracking’ measures (‘information - based’) either point of gaze (where one is

looking) or motion of eye relative to head. [An experimental study is addressed in this paper].



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 366

Electro - Dermal Activity (EDA): Electro - dermal Activity (EDA) Skin Conductance, Galvanic

Skin Response (GSR), Electro - dermal Response (EDR), Psycho - galvanic Reflex (PGR), Skin

Conductance Response (SCR), and Skin Conductance Level (SCL) measures (‘information - based’)

continuous variation in electrical properties of human skin.

BOLD: Blood - Oxygen - Level Dependent Contrast Imaging or BOLD - contrast imaging is used to

observe active areas of brain at any given point of time.

Cognito - Instruments (Eye ‘tracking’)

A cognito - based eye ‘tracking’ experiment was conducted at NTN University, Taiwan to

experiment (‘information - based’) judgement making dynamics of managers.

Time to First Fixation_4.JPG_1_N Time to First Fixation_ 4.JPG_1_Mean Time to First

Fixation_4.JPG_1_Sum Time to First Fixation_4.JPG_2_N Time to First Fixation_4.JPG_2_Mean

Time to First Fixation_4.JPG_2_Sum Time to First Fixation_4.JPG_3_N Time to First

Fixation_4.JPG_3_Mean Time to First Fixation_4.JPG_3_Sum Time to First Fixation_4.JPG_4_N

Time to First Fixation_4.JPG_4_Mean Time to First Fixation_4.JPG_4_Sum Time to First

Fixation_5.JPG_5_N Time to First Fixation_5.JPG_5_Mean Time to First


Time to First Fixation_6.JPG_6_Sum Time to First Fixation_6.JPG_7_N Time to First

Fixation_6.JPG_7_Mean Time to First Fixation_6.JPG_7_Sum Time to First Fixation_7.JPG_10_N

Time to First Fixation_7.JPG_10_Mean Time to First Fixation_7.JPG_10_Sum Time to

First Fixation_7.JPG_8_N Time to First Fixation_7.JPG_8_Mean Time to First


Time to First Fixation_7.JPG_9_Sum First Fixation Duration_4.JPG_1_N First Fixation

Duration_4.JPG_1_Mean First Fixation Duration_4.JPG_1_Sum First Fixation

Duration_4.JPG_2_N First Fixation Duration_4.JPG_2_Mean First Fixation

Duration_4.JPG_2_Sum First Fixation Duration_4.JPG_3_N First Fixation








Duration_7.JPG_10_N First Fixation Duration_7.JPG_10_Mean



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 367



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 368



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 369

The following deductions were obtained:-

Eye ‘tracking’ affords instrumental evidence during judgement making process.

Eye ‘tracking’ is recognised as an appreciated method to appraise conception procedures in a

manager - centered judgement process.

Apart from judgement - task exactitudes and conclusion stretches, eye movements can be logged

to scrutinise judgement - task key approaches and cognitive workload of managers.



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 370

Eye movement help managers represent vigorous judgement making in an articulate mode.

Strong variations in eye movement comportment represent judgement certainty

Observing oculomotor variables in judgement - task routine helps identify transitory situations

of ambiguity.

Eye movements serve as a calculation technique that goes beyond customary analysis.

Conclusion

Real-world problems are complex. Psychologists offer how people make (algorithmic) judgements.

Philosophers, management scholars and economists offer areas of overlap between cognitive

modeling and multi-attribute judgement. This offers hope to stimulate further cross-fertilization and

inspire research exploring boundary conditions of various models in ‘Judgemental 7.0 ‘continuum.

Deciphering brain - (algorithmic) judgements transactions requires mechanistic understandings of

cognito - biological processes that implement organisational (algorithmic) judgement-making. There

is crucial difference between ‘thinking about thinking’ and actually enhancing brain processes by

developing latent potential of each individual in (algorithmic) judgements in ‘Judgemental 7.0

‘platform. Research on interstellar continuum and commercial inter - galactic continuum can

accomplish this through neural computations. If human brain is compared with computer, humans

define goals for information processing in computers, whereas goals for biological brains are

determined by need for survival in uncertain and competitive environs.

Organisational cognitive cognito - science is a brave new world of research opportunities in in

‘Judgemental 7.0 ‘continuum. Cognito - imaging has attracted concerns from those critical of

cognitoscientific research in sustainable trade and in Judgemental 7.0. Organisational cognitive

cognito - science research has made a number of inroads into understanding managerial

(algorithmic) judgement-making in in ‘Judgemental 7.0 ‘continuum .There is growing interest in

exploring potential links between human biology and management to bear on place of mental

processes in explaining managerial judgement and operationalness. This paper offers, in a nut -

shell, the entire drapery of a cognitomanagerial ‘modulator-demodulator’ to answer issues in data -

transmission from the (sustainable trade) milieu to the managerial mind and vice versa in judgement

making dynamics. This represents multidisciplinary and multi-method approach to

conceptualization of management and organisations.



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 371

References

Satpathy, J., Maheshkar, S. and Dharwadkar, K. (2019). Inquiry into Digitalised Neuro - Decision

Making, Proceedings of International Conference on Industry 4.0: Engaging with Disruptions, 30 Sep

- 01 Oct 2019, Global Business School and Research Centre, Dr D Y Patil University, Pune India

(International). Forthcoming

Satpathy, J. (2019). Ophthalmic Signatures in Lending Decisions, Proceedings of International

Conference on Transformation in Industry in an Era of Digitalization: Challenges and Opportunities

(ICID 2019) , 28 Sep 2019, Dept. of Commerce, Guru Nanak College (Autonomous), Chennai, Tamil

Nadu, India (International).

Satpathy, J. and et. al. (2019). Neuro - Diagonals in Managerial Preferences, Proceedings of

National Conference on Strategic Human Resources Management : A Global Perspective, 13 Sep

2019, Dept. of Management, St Mary’s College (Autonomous), Toothukudi, Tamil Nadu, India

(National).

Satpathy, J. and Banerji, J. S. (2019). Neuro - Economic ‘Agent’ in Business Transformation, A

Journal of Composition Theory, UGC - CARE Group ‘A’ Journal Approval Number: 18482, Volume

XII, Issue VII, July, Pp: 426-442, DOI: 19.18001.AJCT.2019.V12I7.19.10048, Karnataka, India

(National).

Satpathy, J. and Banerji, J. S. (2019). Neuro - Monikers in Entrepreneurial Behaviour, Poster

Paper, Society for Judgment and Decision Making (SJDM) Conference, 15-18 November 2019,

Montreal, Canada (International). Accepted and Forthcoming.

Satpathy, J. and Banerji, J. S. (2019). Oculo - Tactical Monikers in Managerial Decision,

Proceedings of Global Management Research and Education: Challenges and Opportunities

(GOMRECA 2019) Conference, 09 - 10 Aug 2019, Dept. of Management, International School of

Management (ISM),Patna, Bihar, India (National).

Satpathy, J., Malhotra, S., Hejmadi, A., Pradhan, S., Sahoo, K. and Wadhwa, C. (2019). Endoscopic

View of Neuro - Preference Connectionism, European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, ISSN:

2235-767X, Volume 07 Issue 06, June, Pp: 182 - 202, Zurich, Switzerland (International).

Satpathy, J., Hejmadi, A. and Mishra, I. (2019). Clinical Observation On Neuro - Decision

Capability, European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, ISSN: 2235-767X, Volume 07 Issue 05, May, Pp: 1091 - 1109, Zurich, Switzerland (International).

Satpathy, J., Pati, P., Hejmadi, A., Gankar, S. and Malhotra, S. (2019). Visual Monikers in

Entrepreneurial Choices, European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, ISSN: 2235-767X,

Volume 07 Issue 05, May, Pp: 374 - 380, Zurich, Switzerland (International).



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 372

Satpathy, J. and Hejmadi, A. (2019). Neurophysiological Drivers of Chaos in Entrepreneurial

Decision (Poster), NeuroPsychoEconomics Conference, Code: P - 05, NeuroPsychoEconomics

Conference, 06 - 07 June, LUISS University, Rome, Italy (International).

Mishra, B.P. and Satpathy, J. (2019). Managerial Decision Making, Journal of Personnel Focus,

ISSN: 2229 - 6506, Vol. 14, Issue (3), July, Pp: 01 - 07, Bhubaneswar, India (National).

Satpathy, J. and Hejmadi, A. (2019). Managerial Decision Uncertainties In VUCA Spectrum,

Proceedings of National Seminar on Issues and Challenges in VUCA World, 23 Mar 2019, ICBM -

School of Business Excellence, Hyderabad, Telengana, India (Adjudged as Outstanding Research

Paper) (National).

Satpathy, J. and Hejmadi, A. (2019). Neuro - Optometric Decision Estimates in Managing Creative

Organisation, Proceedings of National Seminar on Managing Resource through Creativity for

Generating Opportunities in 21st Century, Pp: 30 - 55, ISBN Number: 978 - 81 - 922746 - 9 - 0, S B Patil

Institute of Management, Pune University, 18 -19 Jan 2019, Pune, India (National).

Satpathy, J. and Hejmadi, A. (2019). Electrodermal Traces in Decision Making, Proceedings of

National Seminar on Technology, Innovation, Policy Initiatives and Entrepreneurship Development

(NSTIPED - 2019), 30th - 31st Jan 2019, Parala Maharaja Engineering College, BPUT University,

Berhampur, Odisha, India (National).

Satpathy, J., Hejmadi, A. and Padmaja, B. (2019), Cardio - Peep Into Organisational Decision

Foundation, Proceedings of National Seminar on 'Human Dimension In Information Age', 21 - 22 Feb

2019, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Ongole, Andhra Pradesh, India (National).

Satpathy, J. (2019). Neuro - Optometric Decision Estimates in Managing Creative Organization

(Poster), 4th Coller Conference on Behavioral Economics (CCBE), 19 - 20 June 2019, Center for

Behavior Change, Tel Aviv University, Israel (International).

Satpathy, J., Hejmadi, A., Mishra, D. and Singh, S. (2018). Managerial Eyes for Business

Decisions, FMU Journal of Management, Department of Business Management, Vol. 5 and 6, March

2018, Balasore, India (National).

Satpathy, J. (2018). Neuro - Based Decisions in Global Business Undercurrents, IMS International

Conference on Indian Trade and Commerce: Past, Present and Future, March 18, Bhubaneswar, India

(International).

Satpathy, J. and Hejmadi, A. (2018). Decision Signatures in Managerial Brain Architecture

(Poster), Proceedings of NeuroPsychoEconomics Conference, Pp: 61, May 24 - 25, Zurich,

Switzerland. (International).



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 373

Satpathy, J. and Hejmadi, A., Subhashree P. and Mishra, S. (2018). Decision Monikers in

Managerial Eyes, Proceedings of International Conference on Contemporary Issues in Business

Innovation, Technology and Social Sciences, Gautam Buddha University, 01 - 02 June 2018, June 2018,

Noida (UP), India (International).

Satpathy, J. and Mishra,S. (2018). Cognitive Competence ‘Agent’ in Organisational Decisions,

Proceedings of National Conference on Business Transformation Through Strategy And Innovation

(BTTSI-2018), BIITM Institute, Biju Patnaik University of Technology, 11 July 2018, Bhubaneswar

(Odisha), India (National).

Deo, M. and Satpathy, J. (2018). Hematological Insight into Entrepreneurial Decision, 71st All

India Commerce Conference, 20-22 Dec, Department of Commerce, Osmania University, Hyderabad,

India. (National).

Satpathy, J. and Mallik, B. (2018). Hematological Judgement in Entrepreneurial Decision,

Proceedings of International Conference on Management, Sciences, Engineering and Applications

(ICMSEA - 2018), Dept. of Mathematics, Centurion University, Odisha; Kaziranga University, Assam

and University of Perpetual Help, Philippines, 20 - 22 Dec 2018, Vishakhapatnam, India

(International).

Satpathy, J. and Mallik, B. (2018). Mathematical Exposition on Eye Movements in Decision

Dynamics, Proceedings of International Conference on Mathematical Sciences in Engineering

Applications (ICMSEA - 2017), Dept. of Mathematics, Centurion, University, 22 - 24 Dec 2017,

Vishakhapatnam, India (International).

Satpathy, J. and Singh, S. (2017). Romancing Neurodecision Making, Imperial Journal of

Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR), Vol. 3, Issue 4, ISSN: 1556-1583, Pp: 2171 - 2198, UAE].

(International).

Satpathy, J. and Mishra, B.P. (2017). Review on Neuromanagerial Decision Crescendos, Imperial

Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR), Vol. 3, Issue 9, ISSN: 2454 - 1362, Pp: 65 - 115, UAE

(International)

Satpathy, J. and Mishra, B.P. (2017). Managerial Neuro - Hybrid Decision Architecture, Imperial

Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR), Vol. 3, Issue 10, ISSN: 2454 - 1362, Pp: 245 - 292, UAE

(International)

Mishra, B.P. and Satpathy, J. (2017). How Managers Decide?, Journal of Personnel Focus, ISSN:

2229 - 6506, Vol. 13, Issue (1), July, Pp: 01 - 28, Bhubaneswar, India (National)



ISSN : 0950-0707

Page No : 374

neuro - evidence based managerial judgementsjournalstd.com/gallery/44-sep2019.pdf · the mind and...

Documents