neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation fonseca r,...
Post on 15-Jan-2016
235 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Neuronal activity determines the protein
synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T.
Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie Tanaka, Hanz Tao, Cindy Tsau, Vincent Tse, Christine Tran, Victor Tung, Christian Villarosa, Courtney Warren, Jared Whittier, Tim Wong, Abel Wu
![Page 2: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OutlineI. Introduction
a) Definitions
b) Background and Findings
II. Experiment 1: Protein Synthesis Blockade on L-LTP at 0.017Hz
III. Experiment 2: Protein Synthesis Blockade on L-LTP at 0.100Hz
IV. Experiment 3: Protein Synthesis, Test Pulse Stimulations, and NMDA Receptors
V. Conclusions
VI. Critiques
VII.Questions
![Page 3: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
IntroductionThis paper looks at how protein synthesis inhibition affects long term potentiation, both early and late stage.
Definitions:Long term potentiation (LTP) is divided into two phases:
• E-LTP = Early Phase Long Term Potentiation. - Increased synaptic sensitivity that occurs up to one hour
following LTP induction.
• L-LTP = Late Phase Long Term Potentiation. - Potentiation that occurs one hour and beyond.
![Page 4: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Background and Findings• It is generally accepted that only L-LTP was
dependent on protein synthesis. – This experiment finds that E-LTP may also be dependent on protein synthesis
• It is also generally accepted that L-LTP maintenance is dependent on translation in the early induction phase.– This experiment shows that L-LTP maintenance depends on synaptic stimulation
• The TAKE HOME POINTS:– Neuronal Activity is crucial in determining the role of protein synthesis in E and L-LTP– Protein synthesis occurs at the dendrites
![Page 5: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
MethodsSlice Preparations
• Male Wistar rats• 3-4 weeks old• Hippocampi were
isolated and cut into 400 μm transverse slices.
• hello
![Page 6: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Methods Electrophysiological Recordings
• Schaffer collaterals were stimulated by pulses lasting 0.2 ms (unless otherwise noted) at varying frequencies. – Test Pulse stimulation
• Field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSP) were recorded extracellulary in the stratum radiatum of the CA1 region.
![Page 7: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
MethodsInduction of LTP
• Two stimulating
electrodes were used,
positioned in the
stratum radiatum.
• This allowed for the activation of two sets of Schaffer collaterals which were independent of each other.
![Page 8: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
MethodsInduction of LTP
• Experimental pathway– Received a tetanus at a frequency of 100 Hz for 1
second
• Control pathway. – Test pulse frequency set at 0.1 Hz.
![Page 9: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
MethodsProtein Synthesis Inhibitor
• 25 μM of Anisomycin in 0.01% DMSO
• Anisomycin inhibits protein synthesis– Blocks translation of mRNA
![Page 10: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Experiment 1 Protein Synthesis Blockade on L-LTP
• Tests the effect of protein synthesis blockade on L-LTP
• Anisomycin was bath applied for 100 minutes. At 40 minutes, LTP was induced by tetanic stimulation.– Test pulse frequency was 0.017 Hz (roughly 1/min)
• Results:– E-LTP = unaffected.
– L-LTP = affected
![Page 11: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Experiment 1Figure 1a and 1b
![Page 12: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Experiment 1c and 1d
• The other part of experiment 1 in this paper shows that when protein synthesis inhibitors are added after LTP induction, there is no change to E-LTP or L-LTP.
![Page 13: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Experiment 1Figure 1c and 1d
![Page 14: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Experiment 1Conclusions
• Anisomycin must be present during the induction of LTP in order to affect L-LTP.
• L-LTP is crucially dependent on protein synthesis during early induction of LTP
• E-LTP is seemingly unaffected (0.017 Hz).
![Page 15: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Experiment 2
• Experiment 1 was repeated using different test pulse frequencies.– 0.017 Hz vs 0.1 Hz
• Test to see if LTP maintenance and protein synthesis increases with increased levels of synaptic activity
![Page 16: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Experiment 2Figure 2a and 2b
• hello
![Page 17: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Experiment 2Figure 1a vs Figure 2a
Figure 1a = 0.017 Hz Figure 2a = 0.1 Hz
![Page 18: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Experiment 2Figure 2c and 2d
![Page 19: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Experiment 2Conclusions
• At higher frequencies, E-LTP is affected.
• The stimulation frequency during inhibition does not effect the final amount of LTP reduction
• Higher levels of synaptic activity require more protein synthesis for LTP maintenance
![Page 20: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Experiment 3
• To change the protocol of previous experiments and observe LTP decay– Anisomycin applied for 100 mins after tetanus
• 1 expt: anisomycin applied during period of no test pulses
• 2nd expt: anisomycin applied 100 minutes with 20 minutes of test pulses in the middle of application
• 3rd expt: repeat 2nd expt with concurrent AP5 (NMDA antagonist) treatment and removal
• Help prove hypothesis that elevated synaptic activation may decrease availability of proteins important for LTP
![Page 21: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Experiment 3Figure 3a and 3b
• Inhibitor applied with no test pulse stimulation– No decrease in L-LTP
![Page 22: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Experiment 3Figure 3c and 3d
• Inhibitor applied with test pulse stimulation– L-LTP decreases
![Page 23: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Experiment 3Figure 3d and 3f
• Inhibitor applied with AP-5 and test pulse stimulation– L-LTP is saved, no decrease
![Page 24: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Experiment 3Conclusions
• Test pulse stimulation must occur during protein synthesis inhibitor application in order to have any effect on L-LTP.– LTP decays as a supply of synthesized proteins for
maintenance is inhibited
• If AP-5 is applied with the inhibitor (with test pulse stimulation), LTP decrease is prevented.– Implicates translation is happening at the potentiated
synapses and dendritic area– Implicates Ca2+ as a modulator of translational activity
![Page 25: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Paper Conclusions• Experiment 1
– L-LTP is crucially dependent on protein synthesis during early induction of LTP
• Experiment 2– Increase in synaptic activity (test pulse frequency) reveals
that E-LTP may also require protein synthesis.• Higher frequency leads to accelerated decay of LTP
• Experiment 3– Stimulation of potentiated synapses recruits protein
synthesis for LTP maintenance
– Protein synthesis is modulated by NMDA R/Ca2+ activity
– Protein synthesis very likely occurs at dendritic area and the potentiated synapse
![Page 26: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Critiques• 30% of the data was rejected and not included
in the paper– Fix: Include the data in the write up
• Reasoning behind why the experiments worked was not discussed– No explanation as to why a change in frequency
affects LTP– No explanation about the interaction between
protein synthesis and AP-5
![Page 27: Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T. Group 8 : Seaton Tai, Kristie](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033018/56649d5e5503460f94a3d5dc/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)