neutrinos & the minos experimentminos/seminaria/seminarium_dyplomowe-minos2.pdf\2.5x1013...
TRANSCRIPT
Neutrinos & theMINOS Experiment
Krzysztof Wojciech FornalskiWF PW 2007
supervisor:Dr Katarzyna Grzelak
UW
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 2
Overview of the talk
neutrino theoryneutrino beam & MINOS experimentsoftware analysisneutrino eventsfirst results of event selectionsummary
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 3
A little bit of theory
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 4
Standard modelthere are 3generations ofneutrinosneutrinos are non-charged leptonsneutrinos have avery low massneutrinos are notvisible!we can detect themthanks to particlecollisions
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 5
Theory
in many neutrino experiments scientistsproved that neutrinos can oscillate intoeach other (for ex. K2K experiment)the neutrino „flavour” is changing duringtheir travel
νµ <−> ντ <−> νe <−> νµ etc.
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 6
Theory
The approximate formula describing oscillations is:
P(να → νβ) = sin22θ sin2(1.27 ∆m2 L/E) where L (source to detector distance) and E
(neutrino energy) are experimental parameters
2θ (mixing angle) and ∆m2 (mass squareddifference) are oscillation parameters
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 7
Example of a νµ disappearancemeasurement
Look for a deficit of νµ events at FD)/267.1(sin2sin1)( 222 ELmP ∆−=→ θνν µµ
1 2
1
2
Unoscillated
Oscillated
νµ spectrum spectrum ratioMonte Carlo Monte Carlo
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 8
MINOS Experiment
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 9
First informations
MinosMinos - mythical Greek king of Creta, son ofZeus and EuropeMMain IInjector NNeutrino OOscillation SSearch- along-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment
Two detectors (at FermiLab and Soudan)The MINOS experiment measures theneutrino oscillation between the detectors
Experiment started in 2005First results at the beginning of 2006
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 10
Beam production
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 11
Production of the beam
Fermi National Laboratorynear Chicago120 GeV protons from theMain Injector acceleratortime between pulses - 2s(design parameter)length of the pulse = 10µs2.5x1013 protons/pulse
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 12
Producing the neutrino beam- the scheme
Proton beam collides with a graphite target. As aresult there are many short-life particles (pions, kaons,etc.), which decay into muons (and ν). Muons decayinto muon neutrinos. In such a way the neutrino beamis formed.
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 13
MINOS long-baselineexperiment detectors
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 14
Why „long-baseline”experiment?
neutrino beam travels fromFermilab to the Near Detector(ND) at Fermilab and to the FarDetector (FD) in the SoudanMine (Minnesota)long distance betweendetectors => neutrino
oscillations
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 15
Detectors constructionNear & Far detectors are functionallyidenticalThey share the same basic detectortechnology and granularity:
Iron/Scintillator trackingcalorimeters2.54cm thick magnetized steelplanes <B> = 1.2T1cm thick scintillator planesAlternate planes rotated by ±90o
(U,V)thanks to this rotation we can findthe 3D representation of an event
UVUVUVUVSteelScintillator
Orthogonalstrips
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 16
MINOS Near Detector (ND)Located at FNAL1040m from thetarget103m undergroundmass 980 tons3.8m x 4.8m x 16m282 steel + 153scintillator planesND is to measurethe beamcomposition andenergy spectrum
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 17
MINOS Far Detector (FD)
735 km from the target705m underground5.4 kton mass8m x 8m x 30m484 scintillator planesveto shield for cosmicray rejection inatmospheric ν analysisFD to search forevidence of oscillations
Veto Shield
Coil
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 18
Software analysis
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 19
How you can see the signalIn the picture you can see a track of the muon in ND as the
result of the neutrino interaction. Each point is a signal fromone scintillator strip
beam
21st January
2005
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 20
Types of interactions
Neutral Current (NC) - Z boson exchange
ν + N -> ν + X(X - hadronic cascade)Charged Current (CC) - W bosons exchange
ν + N -> l + X (X - hadronic cascade, l - charged lepton)
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 21
Neutral Current orCharged Current?
νµ CC Event NC Event νe CC EventUZ
VZ
•We have µ with long µ track+ hadronic shower
• short, with typicalEM shower profile•no µ !•No electron track -short radiation length
• short event, oftendiffuse•the neutrino is“deflected”!
3.5m 1.8m 2.3m
Data analysisand my first results
(Far Detector)
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 23
Data structure
ROOT TTree (NTuple)MC or DataThere is 1000 to 5000 neutrino events inone filemany variables in each eventtree structure - branches and leaves
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 24
Some variables - examples- ‘evthdr’ branch
evthdr.ph.sigcor – pulse height of the event(visible energy)
evthdr.ntrack – number of reconstructedtracks in the event
evthdr.nshower – numer of recontructedhadronic cascades in the event
evthdr.planeall.n – number of activescintillator planes (total lenght of the event)
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 25
One important MC variable
mc.iaction‘mc’ branch= 1 when there is a CC event= 0 when there is a NC eventthanks to that we can compare thedistributions for the NC and CC events...
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 26
NC & CC event distributionsMonte Carlo simulation
Do wstawienia plik MC_IACTION.JPG wGeVach!
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 27
Medium-energy beam
Some examples ofvariables’ distributions
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 29
evthdr.ph.sigcor variableNC & CC comparison
Sigcor.jpg
evthdr.ph.sigcor (visible energy)
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 30
evthdr.planeall.n variable NC & CC comparison
evthdr.planeall.n (event lenght)
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 31
evthdr.nstrip variable NC & CC comparison
evthdr.nstrip (number of strips)
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 32
evthdr.ph.sigcor/evthdr.planeall.n variable NC & CC comparison
evthdr.ph.sigcor/evthdr.planeall.n (energy / event lenght)
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 33
energy in the first x planes (x=1/4) / energy of the main shower
NC & CC comparison
energy in the first x planes (x=1/4) / energy of the main shower
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 34
NC & CC selection alghoritm
Thanks to cuts onvariables alghoritmcan separate CCfrom NC events
•We have candidates for NC and CC events
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 35
Purity and efficiency of theNC & CC selection
To check the correctness of the selection, it isnecessary to calculate the purity and efficiencyof the selection:Pur = Ntrue / (Ntrue + Nfalse)Eff = Ntrue / Nall
where Ntrue is a number of correctly selectedevents, Nfalse of incorrectly events, Nall is thenumber of all events (CC or NC)
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 36
Purity ‘Pur’
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 37
Efficiency „Eff’
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 38
Near future...
better NC & CC selectionbetter Pur & Eff histogramsadd new NC & CC variables to this selectionuse more events to check the selectionalghoritmmake my alghoritm better and better...
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 39
Summary
MINOS is a new neutrino experiment in USAthe main goal is to test the neutrinooscillation hypothesis and measure theoscillation parametersit is necessary to have selected NC and CCeventsthe selection must be as good as possible
Krzysztof W. Fornalski 40
References
www-numi.fnal.gov
especially:www-numi.fnal.gov/talks/results093e18.htmlwww-numi.fnal.gov/talks/results127e18.htmlbeaker.astro.indiana.edu/brebel/powerpoint/minos_overview.ppt