new application for grants under the · 2014. 7. 18. · u.s. department of education washington,...

U.S. Department of EducationWashington, D.C. 20202-5335

APPLICATION FOR GRANTSUNDER THE

84.282M CSP Grants for Replication and Expansion

CFDA # 84.282M

PR/Award # U282M110023

Gramts.gov Tracking#: GRANT10945437

OMB No. , Expiration Date:

Closing Date: Aug 11, 2011


U282M110023 0023

**Table of Contents**

Form Page

1. Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 e3

Attachment - 1 (1245-16.B. congressional districts, RMA) e6

2. Standard Budget Sheet (ED 524) e7

3. Assurances Non-Construction Programs (SF 424B) e9

4. Disclosure Of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL) e11

5. ED GEPA427 Form e12

Attachment - 1 (1236-427 RMA) e13

6. Grants.gov Lobbying Form e14

7. Dept of Education Supplemental Information for SF-424 e15

8. ED Abstract Narrative Form e16

Attachment - 1 (1235-RMA Proposal Abstract) e17

9. Project Narrative Form e18

Attachment - 1 (1244-RMA Project Narrative) e19

10. Other Narrative Form e63

Attachment - 1 (1237-Attachment 1, RMA) e64


Attachment - 3 (1239-Attachment 3 RMA) e103





11. Budget Narrative Form e468

Attachment - 1 (1234-RMA, Budget Narrative) e469

12. Form FaithBased_SurveyOnEEO-V1.2.pdf e485

This application was generated using the PDF functionality. The PDF functionality automatically numbers the pages in this application. Some pages/sections of this application may contain 2

sets of page numbers, one set created by the applicant and the other set created by e-Application's PDF functionality. Page numbers created by the e-Application PDF functionality will be

preceded by the letter e (for example, e1, e2, e3, etc.).

Page e2

U282M110023 0023

OMB Number: 4040-0004Expiration Date: 03/31/2012

* 1. Type of Submission: * 2. Type of Application:

* 3. Date Received: 4. Applicant Identifier:

5a. Federal Entity Identifier: 5b. Federal Award Identifier:

6. Date Received by State: 7. State Application Identifier:

* a. Legal Name:

* b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EIN/TIN): * c. Organizational DUNS:

* Street1:

Street2:

* City:

County/Parish:

* State:

Province:

* Country:

* Zip / Postal Code:

Department Name: Division Name:

Prefix: * First Name:

Middle Name:

* Last Name:

Suffix:

Title:

Organizational Affiliation:

* Telephone Number: Fax Number:

* Email:

* If Revision, select appropriate letter(s):

* Other (Specify):

State Use Only:

8. APPLICANT INFORMATION:

d. Address:

e. Organizational Unit:

f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application:

Application for Federal Assistance SF-424

Preapplication

Application

Changed/Corrected Application

New

Continuation

Revision

08/11/2011 NA

NA NA

Richard Milburn Academy, Inc.

541864466 9411045310000

27 Congress Street

Shetland Park #310

Salem

Essex

MA: Massachusetts

USA: UNITED STATES

01970-7309

Peter

G

Briggs

President RMA/TX & RMA, Inc.

RMA

(978)741-7161 (978) 741-0414

[email protected]


Page e3

U282M110023 0023

* 9. Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type:

Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type:

Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type:

* Other (specify):

* 10. Name of Federal Agency:

11. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number:

CFDA Title:

* 12. Funding Opportunity Number:

* Title:

13. Competition Identification Number:

Title:

14. Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.):

* 15. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project:

Attach supporting documents as specified in agency instructions.


M: Nonprofit with 501C3 IRS Status (Other than Institution of Higher Education)

E: Regional Organization

G: Independent School District

U.S. Department of Education

84.282

Charter Schools

ED-GRANTS-071211-001

Charter Schools Program (CSP) Grants for Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools - CFDA 84.282M

84-282M2011-1

Go Career! Go College! Expanding Opportunities for High Need Students

View AttachmentsDelete AttachmentsAdd Attachments

View AttachmentDelete AttachmentAdd Attachment


Page e4

U282M110023 0023

* a. Federal

* b. Applicant

* c. State

* d. Local

* e. Other

* f. Program Income

* g. TOTAL

.

Prefix: * First Name:

Middle Name:

* Last Name:

Suffix:

* Title:

* Telephone Number:

* Email:

Fax Number:

* Signature of Authorized Representative: * Date Signed:

18. Estimated Funding ($):

21. *By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications** and (2) that the statements herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances** and agree to comply with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U.S. Code, Title 218, Section 1001)

** The list of certifications and assurances, or an internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or agency specific instructions.

Authorized Representative:


* a. Applicant

Attach an additional list of Program/Project Congressional Districts if needed.

b. Program/Project

* a. Start Date: * b. End Date:

16. Congressional Districts Of:

17. Proposed Project:

MA006 TX27

16.B. congressional districts, RMA.pdf Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment

06/30/201601/01/2012

6,213,036.00

0.00

23,440,600.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

29,653,636.00

a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on

b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review.

c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.

08/11/2011

Yes No

Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment

** I AGREE

Barbara

Tamez

Executive Assistant

703.494.7882x106 703.494.6093

[email protected]

Barbara Tamez

* 20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If "Yes," provide explanation in attachment.)

* 19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process?

08/11/2011

If "Yes", provide explanation and attach


Page e5

U282M110023 0023

27 Congress Street, Shetland Park #310, Salem, MA 01970 Phone (978) 741-7161 • Fax (978) 741-0414

Richard Milburn Academy

16.B APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE (SF-424)

CONGRESSIONAL

DISTRICTS

1. Corpus Christi, TX - Congressional District TX-027

2. Round Rock, TX - Congressional District TX-031

3. Arlington, TX - Congressional District TX –024

4. Spring, TX - Congressional District TX-018

5. Volusia County, FL - Congressional District FL-007

6. Lee County, FL - Congressional District FL-014

7. Manatee County, FL - Congressional District FL-011

8. Bradenton County, FL - Congressional District FL-011


Page e6

U282M110023 0023

Project Year 1(a)

OMB Control Number: 1890-0018

Expiration Date: 02/28/2011

* Name of Institution/Organization Applicants requesting funding for only one year should complete the column under "Project Year 1." Applicants requesting funding for multi-year grants should complete all applicable columns. Please read all instructions before completing form.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION BUDGET INFORMATION

NON-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS

SECTION A - BUDGET SUMMARY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FUNDS

6. Contractual

4. Equipment

Budget Categories

Project Year 2(b)

1. Personnel

2. Fringe Benefits

3. Travel

5. Supplies

11. Training Stipends

7. Construction

8. Other9. Total Direct Costs (lines 1-8)

12. Total Costs (lines 9-11)

10. Indirect Costs*

Project Year 3(c)

Project Year 4(d)

Project Year 5(e)

Total(f)

*Indirect Cost Information (To Be Completed by Your Business Office): If you are requesting reimbursement for indirect costs on line 10, please answer the following questions:

(1) Do you have an Indirect Cost Rate Agreement approved by the Federal government?

* Period Covered by the Indirect Cost Rate Agreement: To:

* Approving Federal agency:

From: (mm/dd/yyyy)

171,500.00

34,300.00

27,000.00

5,000.00

4,000.00

238,000.00

0.00

0.00

479,800.00

19,192.00

498,992.00

(2) If yes, please provide the following information:

(3) For Restricted Rate Programs (check one) -- Are you using a restricted indirect cost rate that:

ED Form No. 524

1,161,784.00 864,604.00 1,843,788.00 1,843,868.00 6,213,036.00

44,684.00 33,254.00 70,918.00 70,918.00 238,966.00

1,117,100.00 831,350.00 1,772,870.00 1,772,950.00 5,974,070.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

800,000.00 200,000.00 807,620.00 807,700.00 2,853,320.00

30,000.00 0.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 224,000.00

175,100.00 295,350.00 328,250.00 328,250.00 1,131,950.00

52,000.00 52,000.00 62,000.00 62,000.00 255,000.00

10,000.00 10,000.00 80,000.00 80,000.00 214,300.00

50,000.00 274,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 1,295,500.00


Yes No

Complies with 34 CFR 76.564(c)(2)? Is included in your approved Indirect Cost Rate Agreement? or,

ED Other (please specify):


Page e7

U282M110023 0023

Project Year 1(a)

* Name of Institution/Organization Applicants requesting funding for only one year should complete the column under "Project Year 1." Applicants requesting funding for multi-year grants should complete all applicable columns. Please read all instructions before completing form.

SECTION B - BUDGET SUMMARY NON-FEDERAL FUNDS

SECTION C - BUDGET NARRATIVE (see instructions)

6. Contractual

4. Equipment

Budget Categories Project Year 2(b)

1. Personnel

2. Fringe Benefits

3. Travel

5. Supplies

11. Training Stipends

7. Construction

8. Other9. Total Direct Costs (lines 1-8)

12. Total Costs (lines 9-11)

10. Indirect Costs

Project Year 3(c)

Project Year 4(d)

Project Year 5(e)

Total(f)

ED Form No. 524



Page e8

U282M110023 0023

1.

OMB Approval No.: 4040-0007 Expiration Date: 07/30/2010

ASSURANCES - NON-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMSPublic reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-0040), Washington, DC 20503. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET. SEND IT TO THE ADDRESS PROVIDED BY THE SPONSORING AGENCY.

NOTE: Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to your project or program. If you have questions, please contact the awarding agency. Further, certain Federal awarding agencies may require applicants to certify to additional assurances. If such is the case, you will be notified.

As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I certify that the applicant:

Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance and the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of project cost) to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project described in this application.

Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. §794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps; (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; (e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; (f) the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (g) §§523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. §§290 dd-3 and 290 ee- 3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records; (h) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. §§3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (i) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made; and, (j) the requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application.

2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States and, if appropriate, the State, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the award; and will establish a proper accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards or agency directives.

3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain.

4. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency.

5. Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§4728-4763) relating to prescribed standards for merit systems for programs funded under one of the 19 statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit System of Personnel Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F).

6. Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C.§§1681- 1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation

Previous Edition Usable Standard Form 424B (Rev. 7-97)Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102Authorized for Local Reproduction

7. Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of Federal or federally-assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in purchases.

8. Will comply, as applicable, with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§1501-1508 and 7324-7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.


Page e9

U282M110023 0023

Standard Form 424B (Rev. 7-97) Back

9. 12.Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis- Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. §§276a to 276a-7), the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. §276c and 18 U.S.C. §874), and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. §§327- 333), regarding labor standards for federally-assisted construction subagreements.

Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. §§1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system.

10. Will comply, if applicable, with flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more.

11. Will comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b) notification of violating facilities pursuant to EO 11738; (c) protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (d) evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with EO 11988; (e) assurance of project consistency with the approved State management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. §§1451 et seq.); (f) conformity of Federal actions to State (Clean Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§7401 et seq.); (g) protection of underground sources of drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended (P.L. 93-523); and, (h) protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (P.L. 93- 205).

13. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. §470), EO 11593(identification and protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. §§469a-1 et seq.).

14. Will comply with P.L. 93-348 regarding the protection of human subjects involved in research, development, and related activities supported by this award of assistance.

15. Will comply with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (P.L. 89-544, as amended, 7 U.S.C. §§2131 et seq.) pertaining to the care, handling, and treatment of warm blooded animals held for research, teaching, or other activities supported by this award of assistance.

16. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. §§4801 et seq.) which prohibits the use of lead-based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures.

17. Will cause to be performed the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular No. A-133, "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations."

18. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other Federal laws, executive orders, regulations, and policies governing this program.

* SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL * TITLE

* DATE SUBMITTED* APPLICANT ORGANIZATION

Executive Assistant


Barbara Tamez

08/11/2011


Page e10

U282M110023 0023

10. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Registrant:

9. Award Amount, if known: $

* Street 1

* City State Zip

Street 2

* Last Name

Prefix * First Name Middle Name

Suffix

DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIESComplete this form to disclose lobbying activities pursuant to 31 U.S.C.1352

Approved by OMB0348-0046

1. * Type of Federal Action:a. contract

b. grant

c. cooperative agreement

d. loan

e. loan guarantee

f. loan insurance

2. * Status of Federal Action:a. bid/offer/application

b. initial award

c. post-award

3. * Report Type:a. initial filing

b. material change

4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity:Prime SubAwardee

* NameRichard Milbrun Academy, Inc.

* Street 127 Congress Street

Street 2#310 Shetland Park

* CitySalem

StateMA: Massachusetts

Zip01970

Congressional District, if known: MA006

5. If Reporting Entity in No.4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime:

6. * Federal Department/Agency:U.S. Department of Education

7. * Federal Program Name/Description:Charter Schools

CFDA Number, if applicable: 84.282

8. Federal Action Number, if known:

NA

NA

b. Individual Performing Services (including address if different from No. 10a)

Prefix * First Name Middle Name

* Street 1

* City State Zip

Street 2

NA

NA

11.

* Last Name Suffix

Information requested through this form is authorized by title 31 U.S.C. section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying activities is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed by the tier above when the transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. This information will be reported to the Congress semi-annually and will be available for public inspection. Any person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

* Signature:

08/11/2011

Barbara Tamez

*Name: Prefix * First NameBarabara

Middle Name

* Last NameTamez

Suffix

Title: Executive Assistant Telephone No.: 703.494.7882x106 Date:

Federal Use Only: Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form - LLL (Rev. 7-97)


Page e11

U282M110023 0023

OMB Control No. 1894-0005 (Exp. 01/31/2011)

NOTICE TO ALL APPLICANTS

The purpose of this enclosure is to inform you about a new provision in the Department of Education's General Education Provisions Act (GEPA) that applies to applicants for new grant awards under Department programs. This provision is Section 427 of GEPA, enacted as part of the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 (Public Law (P.L.) 103-382).

To Whom Does This Provision Apply?

Section 427 of GEPA affects applicants for new grant awards under this program. ALL APPLICANTS FOR NEW AWARDS MUST INCLUDE INFORMATION IN THEIR APPLICATIONS TO ADDRESS THIS NEW PROVISION IN ORDER TO RECEIVE FUNDING UNDER THIS PROGRAM.

(If this program is a State-formula grant program, a State needs to provide this description only for projects or activities that it carries out with funds reserved for State-level uses. In addition, local school districts or other eligible applicants that apply to the State for funding need to provide this description in their applications to the State for funding. The State would be responsible for ensuring that the school district or other local entity has submitted a sufficient section 427 statement as described below.)

What Does This Provision Require?

Section 427 requires each applicant for funds (other than an individual person) to include in its application a description of the steps the applicant proposes to take to ensure equitable access to, and participation in, its Federally-assisted program for students, teachers, and other program beneficiaries with special needs. This provision allows applicants discretion in developing the required description. The statute highlights six types of barriers that can impede equitable access or participation: gender, race, national origin, color, disability, or age. Based on local circumstances, you should determine whether these or other barriers may prevent your students, teachers, etc. from such access or participation in, the Federally-funded project or activity. The description in your application of steps to be taken to overcome these barriers need not be lengthy; you may provide a clear and succinct

description of how you plan to address those barriers that are applicable to your circumstances. In addition, the information may be provided in a single narrative, or, if appropriate, may be discussed in connection with related topics in the application.

Section 427 is not intended to duplicate the requirements of civil rights statutes, but rather to ensure that, in designing their projects, applicants for Federal funds address equity concerns that may affect the ability of certain potential beneficiaries to fully participate in the project and to achieve to high standards. Consistent with program requirements and its approved application, an applicant may use the Federal funds awarded to it to eliminate barriers it identifies.

What are Examples of How an Applicant Might Satisfy the Requirement of This Provision?

The following examples may help illustrate how an applicant may comply with Section 427.

(1) An applicant that proposes to carry out an adult literacy project serving, among others, adults with limited English proficiency, might describe in its application how it intends to distribute a brochure about the proposed project to such potential participants in their native language. (2) An applicant that proposes to develop instructional materials for classroom use might describe how it will make the materials available on audio tape or in braille for students who are blind. (3) An applicant that proposes to carry out a model science program for secondary students and is concerned that girls may be less likely than boys to enroll in the course, might indicate how it intends to conduct "outreach" efforts to girls, to encourage their enrollment.

We recognize that many applicants may already be implementing effective steps to ensure equity of access and participation in their grant programs, and we appreciate your cooperation in responding to the requirements of this provision.

Estimated Burden Statement for GEPA Requirements

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 1894-0005. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 1.5 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20202-4537.

Optional - You may attach 1 file to this page.

427 RMA.pdf View AttachmentDelete AttachmentAdd Attachment


Page e12

U282M110023 0023

RMA



SECTION 427 OF GEPA RMA Charter Schools are certified to be barrier free, available to all

applicants and accessible to all enrollees. Specifically:

1. All ads and announcements soliciting applicants are in Spanish and English,

both spoken and written.

2. All admissions are on a first-come-first-served bases until fully enrolled and then

by lottery with no disqualifying prior conditions.

3. All RMA schools are currently on ground level, open to all physically

challenged staff and students.

4. All RMA Charter Schools in Florida and Texas are required by state

law to accommodate special learning needs of enrolled students through

tutors (ESL, etc.) or individualized instruction (Milburn OnLine).


Page e13

U282M110023 0023

Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements

(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, ''Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,'' in accordance with its instructions.

(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,00 0 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

If any funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, ''Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,'' in accordance with its instructions. Submission of this statement is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required statement shall be subjec t to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

* APPLICANT'S ORGANIZATION

* SIGNATURE: * DATE:

* PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

Suffix:

Middle Name:

* Title:

* First Name:

* Last Name:

Prefix:

CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING

(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.

The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:

Statement for Loan Guarantees and Loan Insurance

The undersigned states, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:


Barbara

Executive Assistant

Tamez

Barbara Tamez 08/11/2011


Page e14

U282M110023 0023

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION GRANTS

* Zip Code:

* State:

Address:

Prefix: * First Name: Middle Name: * Last Name:

* Phone Number (give area code)

* Street1:

* City:

Suffix:

Email Address:

1. Project Director:

Fax Number (give area code)

2. Applicant Experience:

Novice Applicant

3. Human Subjects Research

Are any research activities involving human subjects planned at any time during the proposed project Period?

Are ALL the research activities proposed designated to be exempt from the regulations?

Provide Exemption(s) #:

Provide Assurance #, if available:

Street2:

* Country:

County:

Please attach an explanation Narrative:

Peter G Briggs

27 Congress Street

Shetland Park #310

Salem

USA: UNITED STATES

MA: Massachusetts

(978)741-7161

Yes No

Yes

No

Yes No Not applicable to this program

Close Form

01970

Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment


Page e15

U282M110023 0023

AbstractThe abstract narrative must not exceed one page and should use language that will be understood by a range of audiences. For all projects, include the project title (if applicable), goals, expected outcomes and contributions for research, policy, practice, etc. Include population to be served, as appropriate. For research applications, also include the following:

Theoretical and conceptual background of the study (i.e., prior research that this investigation builds upon and that provides a compelling rationale for this study)

Study design including a brief description of the sample including sample size, methods, principals dependent, independent, and control variables, and the approach to data analysis.

···

* Attachment:

[Note: For a non-electronic submission, include the name and address of your organization and the name, phone number and e-mail address of the contact person for this project.]

Research issues, hypotheses and questions being addressed

RMA Proposal Abstract.pdf View AttachmentDelete AttachmentAdd Attachment

You may now Close the Form

You have attached 1 file to this page, no more files may be added. To add a different file, you must first delete the existing file.


Page e16

U282M110023 0023

RMA 27 Congress Street, Shetland Park #310, Salem, MA 01970 Phone (978) 741-7161 • Fax (978) 741-0414


PROPOSAL ABSTRACT TITLE: Go Career! Go College! Expanding Opportunity for High Need Students CONTACT: Peter G. Briggs, President RMA, Inc. and

RMA, TX Richard MilburnAcademy, Inc. 27 Congress Street, Shetland Park #310 Salem, MA 01970

Email: [email protected] Phone: 978-741-7161 ext. 239

The RMA, Inc. serves 2500 high need secondary school students, 75% of whom are

economically disadvantaged, in five schools in Florida and nine schools in Texas. The

goals of this project are: Goal 1: Introduce the Corpus Christi, Texas Charter School

Model into six new Texas school districts: Spring ISD, Arlington ISD, Victoria ISD,

Pasadena ISD, Aldine ISD and Round Rock ISD. Goal 2: Increase the number of at

need students served by 60%, from 1,700 to 4,000. Goal 3: Improve CMO project

management and school-based programs through continuous feedback loop of interim

measures of progress toward outcome goals of 90% graduation rate, 60% career rate,

and 30% career preparation rate. Goal 4: Validate teacher and administrator

performance incentive plans (EPIC) utilize by RMH charter management since 2004.

This proposal requests $5,870,640 over five years to address Competitive

Preference Priority 1- Low-Income Demographic and Competitive Preference

Priority 3- Promoting Diversity.


Page e17

U282M110023 0023

Project Narrative File(s)

* Mandatory Project Narrative File Filename:

To add more Project Narrative File attachments, please use the attachment buttons below.

Close Form

RMA Project Narrative.pdf

View Mandatory Project Narrative FileDelete Mandatory Project Narrative FileAdd Mandatory Project Narrative File

Add Optional Project Narrative File Delete Optional Project Narrative File View Optional Project Narrative File


Page e18

U282M110023 0023

Richard Milburn Academies GO CAREER! GO COLLEGE! EXPANDING OPPORTUNITY FOR HIGH NEED STUDENTS August 2011

1

Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. Corporate: 27 Congress Street

Shetland Park #310

Salem, Massachusetts 01970

Telephone (978) 741-7161 ext. 239

Facsimile (978) 741-0414

Peter G. Briggs, CEO

[email protected]

GO CAREER! GO COLLEGE!

EXPANDING OPPORTUNITY FOR HIGH NEED STUDENTS

Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools

August 11, 2011


Page e19

U282M110023 0023

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A. THE RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY: MEASURING SUCCESS…………3 1. The Degree to Which the Applicant has Addressed Student Achievement……....5 2. The Degree to Which the Applicant has Addressed Historic Achievement Gaps…………………………………………………………………………………8 3. The Degree to Which the Applicant has Impacted Specific Metrics……………………………………………………………………...……….8

B. ASSISTING EDUCATIONALLY DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS…………9

C. QUALITY OF DESIGN………………………………………………………….14

1. Reception………………………………………………………………………15 2. Recovery……………………………………………………………………….15 3. Restoration……………………………………………………………………..16 4. Redirection……………………………………………………………………..16 5. Design Costs…………………………………………………………………...16 6. The RMA Program Model……………………………………………………..17 7. Goals, Objectives, and Outcomes…………………………………………….. 24

D. MANAGEMENT PLAN………………………………………………………….25

1. Adequacy of the management plan ……………………………………………25 2. Business plan for improving schools…………………………………………..33 3. Multi-year operating model…………………………………………………….34 4. Plan for closing charter schools.……………………………………………….36 5. Qualifications of key personnel………………………………………………..37

E. EVALUATION PLAN……………………………………………………………..39 Attachments Attachment 1: Resumes Attachment 2: Letters of Support Attachment 3: Proof of Non-Profit Support Attachment 4: Schools Operated by the Applicant Attachment 5: Student Academic Achievement Attachment 6: Organizational Budget and Financial Information Attachment 7: RMA Weekly Attendance Report and Educational Performance Incentive Compact Plan (EPIC)


Page e20

U282M110023 0023

3

A. The Richard Milburn Academy: Measuring Success

Richard Milburn Academies (RNA) are public charter high schools that offer students

who are struggling in the traditional high school setting an opportunity to get back on

track, improve their grades, and earn a high school diploma. Supporting students at

high-risk for drop-out, Richard Milburn Academies implement nontraditional learning

environments, small class sizes, flexible scheduling and a wealth of supportive services

that provide students the individual attention and student-centered academic assistance

necessary to promote positive outcomes. Since the first Richard Milburn Academy

opened in 1998, more than 33,000 students have earned a high school diploma from

these schools, which are dedicated to providing a positive learning environment for even

the most discouraged student. Today, there are eight Richard Milburn Academies in

Texas, meeting the diverse needs of more than 1,500 high school students annually.

The Richard Milburn Academies in Texas are located in diverse regions

across the state- Amarillo, Corpus Christi, Fort Worth, Houston, Killeen, Lubbock,

Midland and Odessa. Although these schools serve diverse communities, there are

striking similarities among the students that choose to enroll in this nontraditional

educational program:

• Economic Issues- 70% of RMA students are economically disadvantaged.

• Academic Issues- RMA students have struggled throughout their academic career,

working hard to meet requirements but too often unable to access home supports that

promoted success for their non-disadvantaged peers.

• Parental Support Issues- The majority of RMA students are potential first-

generation college students. Parents of RMA students frequently have low levels of

education and are not prepared to offer homework assistance. Although RMA


Page e21

U282M110023 0023

4

parents want a better future for their children, they often struggled academically

themselves and are ill equipped to promote scholastic success for their children.

RMA parents are often intimidated by institutions of higher education as they have

little to no experience in this realm. RMA parents often believe that a college

education is unattainable due to both cost and academic difficulty – beliefs that they

unintentionally pass on to their children. As a result, RMA students rarely list any

long-term goals related to education beyond earning a high school diploma when they

first enroll in the Academy. RMA has worked hard to address this, with notable

success that we continue to replicate in the state of Texas and beyond.

One such replication and expansion strategy is the GO CAREER! GO

COLLEGE! EXPANDING OPPORTUNITY FOR HIGH NEED STUDENTS

(GO CAREER! GO COLLEGE!) project, a joint venture between Richard Milburn

Academy, Texas and Agile Mind, Incorporated and Avid, Incorporated. The goals of

the five years of this project include:

Goal 1: Introduce the Corpus Christi, Texas Charter School Model into six new Texas

school districts: Spring ISD, Arlington ISD, Victoria ISD, Pasadena ISD, Aldine ISD

and Round Rock ISD.

Goal 2: Improve CMO project management and school-based programs through

continuous feedback loop of interim measures of progress toward outcome goals of:

o 90% graduation rate

o 60% career rate

o 30% career preparation rate

Goal 3: Validate teacher and administrator performance incentive plans (EPIC) utilize

by RMH charter management since 2004.


Page e22

U282M110023 0023

5

Richard Milburn Academies is applying for an expansion grant to begin January 1, 2012

and end June 30, 2016. Out total grant request is $6,213,036 for a 4 ½ year project to establish

6 additional schools to serve 6,000 students in Texas.

RMA is applying for the following program priorities:

Competitive Preference Priority 1- Low-Income Demographic

In 2009-2010, 70% of Richard Milburn Academy students were eligible for free or reduced-

price lunch. The proposed replication project will serve a comparable student population.

Competitive Preference Priority 3- Promoting Diversity

As described in multiple sections, RMA has demonstrated prior success in promoting diversity,

particularly as it relates to promoting student achievement.

1. The degree to which the applicant has demonstrated success in increasing student

achievement.

In the eleven years of operating charter schools in Texas, over 25,000 at need high

school students have been successfully educated in nine schools. Table 1 contains the

demographic and educational profile of the 2008-09 student population, the most recent data

from the Texas Education Agency (TEA):


Page e23

U282M110023 0023

6

TABLE 1: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY / TEXAS

2009/2010 Student Data / Information Summary

RMA, Inc. RMA/TX, Inc. 2009/10 Amarillo Beaumont Corpus

Christi Killeen Fort

Worth Houston Lubbock Midland Odessa Total

or Avg. Enrollment 411 258 412 326 361 446 816 3,030

Graduates 62 39 75 54 40 38 53 29 47 437

Attendance 81.8% 82.2% 88.0% 89.4% 80.7% 84.6% 85.8% 87.0% 91.6% 85.7%

Completion Rate (w/GED) 2007/08

68.0% 78.0% 63.0% 84.3% 58.4% 43.9% 68.4% 66.3%

Dropout Rate 2007/08 20.3% 16.1% 18.5% 4.4% 22.3% 37.6% 8.5% 18.2%

Students/Teacher 17.7 15.3 16.8 18.0 19.7 15.2 18.1 17.6 22.5 17.9

At-Risk 89.6% 92.2% 89.7% 93.1% 83.9% 97.5% 92.2% 88.0% 83.7% 90.0%

Economically Disadvantaged

59.0% 100% 56.9% 61.7% 79.3% 78.9% 65.4% 52.0% 68.9% 69.1%

Mobility 2007/08 78.7% 47.4% 69.5% 77.7% 73.0% 79.3% 71.3% 71.0%

TAKS Progress Measure

88% 63% 84% 67% 76% 77% 89% 77.7%

Satisfaction Surveys 83.7% 77.5% 91.2% 83.1% 86.9% 80.3% 88.8% 80.2% 95.4% 85.2% Gold Performance

Acknowledgements Class of

2008 Class of 2008


Page e24

U282M110023 0023

7

The profile of RMA, TX schools in Table 1 reveals a uniform record of successful outcomes

with a severely at-need population under demanding circumstances. Over 3,000 students

enrolled in the nine schools is evidence of successfully accomplishing the mission of being

open to all students. However, an average mobility rate of 71% means that over two thirds of

the student body, 2,200 students, came and went during the school year. This is congruent with

the RMA credit recovery mission, which fosters short-term enrollments. However, the high

mobility results in substantially increased administrative and pedagogical burdens compared to

schools that serve more stable and less needy populations.

The data also reveal the diversity and needs of the RMA students as a whole and in each

school: 90% at risk; 69% economically disadvantaged; 64% ethnic/racial minority (separate

PEIMS data source). True to its mission, RMA serves, almost exclusively, the most needy

students; and, for the vast majority, RMA is their last chance for renewal. Under these

circumstances of mobility, poverty, educational gaps and discontinuities, the RMA,

performance is remarkable and is evidence of the efficacy of its philosophy, management, and

programs. An attendance rate of 86% is a direct outgrowth of the RMA Advisor System and

the policy of continual home to school contact. The Completion Rate II of 66% among

dropouts and at risk students is equally impressive.

The TAKS accomplishments are also impressive. Each campus and RMA as a whole far

exceeded the Texas Alternative Education Standard of 50% passing all TAKS Tests. Across all

nine schools, RMA students passed 78% of the TAKS Tests, with four campuses approaching

the 90% passing rate. Finally, although not strictly a performance measure, it is worth pointing

out that 85% of all parents and students surveyed (row eleven) were satisfied with their RMA

school. If this grant is not funded and our 6 new charter schools are not able to be established as

quickly as federal funding would allow, additional children needing an alternative educational


Page e25

U282M110023 0023

8

experience will drop-out or give up, never obtaining the education needed to be successful in

the future workforce. Most of these children will begin a new cycle of poverty, much like that

of their parents who also failed to thrive in school for a multitude of reasons.

2. The degree to which the applicant has demonstrated success in closing historic

achievement gaps.

70% of RMA’s students belong to the subgroups described in Section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II).

Hence, the success of RMA is directly related to closing achievement gaps for these students. As

stated above, students at all nine RMA schools passed 78% of the TAKS Tests, with four

campuses approaching the 90% passing rate.

3. The degree to which the applicant has achieved results in addressing in key metrics.

For the past decade, RMA has tracked each school’s performance as measured by

graduates, withdrawals, dropouts, etc. to determine the school’s Record of Success. This

somewhat complicated metric tracks all students in a school, no matter how brief their stay

and yields two key numbers.


Page e26

U282M110023 0023

9

TABLE 2: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY Cumulative Success Rate by School

1998/99 – 2009/10

School Total Enrollments

Graduates of RMA

Returned to Home School

Recommended to Remain at RMA

Withdrawals Drops Percent Success

Amarillo 2,416 439 388 1,178 101 310 86.6%

Beaumont 2,369 396 316 1,204 164 289 86.9%

Corpus 3,215 412 609 1,531 197 466 84.6%

Killeen 3,541 514 1,141 1,343 309 234 92.8%

Fort Worth

1,843 213 215 1,001 27 387 78.7%

Houston 2,289 223 232 1,047 103 684 68.7%

Odessa 2,044 254 446 1,019 59 266 86.6%

Lubbock 2,940 409 730 1,329 110 362 87.2%

Midland 2,661 317 488 1,123 368 362 84.1%

Total 23,318 3,177 4,565 10,775 1,438 3,360 84.6%


Page e27

U282M110023 0023

9

Table 2 displays the school-by-school and Total RMA, eleven year record of 85% success

with a concomitant dropout rate of 15%. Less abstractly phrased, of the 23,000 RMA students

enrolled over ten years 20,000 have substantially improved their education and their chances for

future success.

B. Assisting Educationally Disadvantaged Students

1. RMA History Richard Milburn Schools exist to rebuild education for three categories of

students. First, those who need to make up a course or two before returning to their home school.

Second, those who need to recover their educational momentum, lost for a variety of reasons and

typically recaptured only through a year of hard work. Finally, those who need to rebuild their

future, usually lost traumatically, and who therefore require a long-term commitment to Richard

Milburn. Thus, to one degree or another all our students are educationally disadvantaged and at

need.

The problem of high school dropouts in America has been thoroughly researched for more

than forty years and addressed at the presidential level since the administration of President

Johnson. More recently, and more urgently, Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama have

highlighted the human and economic costs of this phenomenon, calling for increased funding for

dropout prevention programs (Michael McLaughlin, “High School Dropouts…” the Heritage

Foundation, 1990; Andrew Sum, et. al. “The Hidden Crisis in the High School Dropout

Problems…” Northeastern University, 2003).

And, as despairing as the dropout problem is across our nation, the situation is even worse in

Texas where Richard Milburn Academy proposes to initiate this program to promote college

access and success. The most recent statistics reveal the national scope of the situation:

• Approximately 1.5 million students do not graduate each year


Page e28

U282M110023 0023

10

• More than 50% of the above students are from racial or ethnic minorities

• Only half of the age-eligible minority students graduate from high school with a standard

diploma.

In summary, too many students are dropping out of high school, and far too many of

those students are poor and minorities. Annually, across the United States, more than a million

students dropout; more than half a million of these dropouts are minority students; and a wealthy

student is eight times more likely to graduate than a poor student.

2. High Need Student Program Model. In designing and implementing a successful

secondary program for high need students, it is not enough to know how many high need there

are and where they are located. One most also know why they are dropping out; and in the

process of answering that question, one discovers that “dropout,” with its implication of

individual choice, is an unsatisfactory and perhaps even misleading description.

Students who arrive on the RMA campuses are at immediate need and defy easy

categorization. However, over the twelve years of operating and refining our program, we have

found that they fall into five general groups, approximating the analysis by Robert Balfanz of the

Center for Social Organizations of Schools (CSOS), and subsequently confirmed by “The Silent

Epidemic” Bridgeland, et.al, Civic Enterprises, Johns Hopkins University. The five classes of

dropouts served by RMA are:

Personal Accident. This includes the myriad of teenage troublesome events: pregnancy,

arrest, gang membership, auto accident, etc. Whatever the event is, it either precludes

continuing a conventional high school program or necessitates a more flexible program.

Failure to Thrive. Some students find that their academic, social, co-curricular, and

personal skills are not adequate to the challenges posed by today’s large and competitive

comprehensive high schools. Although there is no such thing as an average ninth grader,


Page e29

U282M110023 0023

11

the typical comprehensive high school hurls them into a complex and competitive

environment virtually overnight. For whatever reason, some do not catch on and begin to

lose confidence and initiative. Soon they fall behind and either quit, act out, or both.

Ignored and Submerged. These students present special needs, e.g. learning disability,

non-native language, or less frequently, unique academic talents. For many reasons,

their school either does not recognize their need or does not respond to it. Consequently,

the student loses interest and motivation.

Family Circumstances. This group correlates with poverty, divorce, death or a

catastrophic family event, such as eviction, homelessness, etc. Unfortunately, during this

current recession these circumstances are all too common; they have a crippling impact on

the students, forcing them to seek part-time work that necessitates a more flexible and

innovative program.

Expelled or Repelled. Students who are dangerous, disruptive, or more often, just

difficult or “different” are either expelled or too frequently suspended. Finding

themselves behind in everything, courses completed, grade point average, low

attendance, they give up and leave school.

3. High Need Program Outcomes. Kicked out. Nudged out. Dropped out. Sent by

sympathetic guidance counselors, stern judges, indifferent policemen. Hostile, confused,

apathetic. Black, Brown, White. For many reasons, from numerous sources, and carrying with

them a variety of attitudes and needs, for over a decade these students have been accepted into

Richard Milburn. Not one has been rejected, for as diverse as their origins may be, they share a

common bond: All are educationally disadvantaged and at the end of the line.


Page e30

U282M110023 0023

12

The value added of an education provided by Richard Milburn charter schools is evident in a

number of metrics:

• Cumulative 10 Year Enrollment: 30,000. A number of this magnitude, achieved in a

decade of operation, indicates that Richard Milburn, the personnel, schools and the CMO

itself, is intimately familiar with the educationally disadvantaged. In fact, no other CMO can

equal RMA’s years of experience and number of students served in the field of the

educationally disadvantaged.

• Average 10 Year Daily Attendance: 81.3%. ADA is a process metric that is proven to be

correlated with academic achievement. The ADA is a substantial achievement by itself and

testimony to the schools’ aggressive monitoring and follow through with truant students.

Furthermore, the ADA has increased over the years, going from 79.1% in 1999 to 85.7% in

2009 in Texas. On any given day, 2,400 at need students are attending classes in a Richard

Milburn Academy in Texas.

• 10 Year Success Rate: 86%. Phrased another way, of the 30,000 students enrolled over ten

years, only 3,900 have dropped out while over 25,000 remained in school or graduated. As

impressive as this decade of success has been in holding and reshaping the lives of students,

the dropout rate can and will be lowered in the proposed project.

• 2008 – 09 Highstakes Test Success Rates:

TABLE 3: RMA, TEXAS 2008 – 09 TAKS RESULTS

Percent Meeting AEA Standard

Reading Math Science Social Science

71% 33% 36% 71%


Page e31

U282M110023 0023

13

The test results shown here are not as high as they should be, but it is not a result of lack of

effort or an inadequate commitment to professional development. For example, in an effort to

improve math scores in Texas, the following changes were made: teacher training funding

increased 120%; math instructional time increased 17%; and $33,000 in bonuses were paid to

math teachers based on TAKS results.

RMA monitors test results closely and quickly mobilizes resources to deal with emerging

needs. Consequently, Texas test scores have steadily improved over the past five years for all

schools and all tests:

TABLE 4: COMPARISON 04 – 09 TAKS PASSING RATES

Reading Math Science Social Science

2009 71% 33% 36% 71%

2004 53% 14% 28% 69%

Change: +18% +19% +8% +2%

There is room for improving the RMA high stakes testing results, but the record is clear. Passing

rates have increased over the years and RMA has the commitment, flexibility and resources to

deploy swiftly and effectively to improve test performance.

4. Beyond Graduation: The RMA Record. From the beginning, the RMA philosophy and

program have embraced post-secondary education as the ultimate goal. Attending RMA was not

simply a credit recovery, short-term, experience and then back to another school for


Page e32

U282M110023 0023

14

graduation. Rather, the RMA program, The Arc of Renewal, is predicated upon crafting a

fundamental redirection in each student’s life. Hence, RMA annually surveys its graduates as to

their plans after graduation and then follows up with a second survey six months later. The results

are encouraging:

TABLE 5: PERCENT POSTSECONDARY PLANNING, 2009

At Graduation Six Month Follow Up

Texas 73% 39%

Their postsecondary intentions at graduation run high; however the rates in the six month

follow up are cause for concern. The mailed survey has only a 40% response rate, but clearly work

needs to be done. For example, in addition to adding “graduation coaching” to the RMA progress,

a unit on post-RMA financial planning and scholarship and grant opportunities will be added to the

curriculum.

C. Quality of Design.

High need students presented to a Richard Milburn Alternative School manifest many

symptoms that demand immediate attention. The RMA model, based upon a unique blend of

extant research refined by twelve years of field experience, consists of a Basic Component of six

elements and an Innovative Component of five elements. It is evolutionary in design and is

experienced by the student as the Arc of Renewal, visualized below in Figure 1:


Page e33

U282M110023 0023

15

The Arc of Renewal

Recovery Restoration

Reception Redirection

Time

Figure 1

The Arc of Renewal is both a process and philosophy, based upon optimism and delivered

with skill and care. From Reception to Redirection, the process is designed to deliver the six

RMA Basic Elements and five RMA Innovative Elements in a healing manner that rebuilds

skills and confidence and leads to previously unimagined career and college aspirations:

1. Reception. The high need student comes with emotional and academic baggage, and is

personally welcomed by the RMA School Director. The Director sets the academic and

organizational parameters and, equally important, the tone of the school. From this point to

graduation, the Director knows the student’s name, history, and circumstances. Furthermore, the

Directors are expected to follow and make contact frequently, when both good and bad things

happen. In brief, the RMA Directors are perceived as receptive, authoritative, engaged in the

student’s life and always present throughout the school. In the RMA school, the Director is the

“Go-To” person.

2. Recovery. Gradually the student is re-introduced into the discipline of academic life,

course selection, attendance, homework, etc. However, this phase of the process is much less


Page e34

U282M110023 0023

16

stressful for the student at RMA because: 1.) The schools are small and classes are small. There

is no back row at RMA, 2.) The student does not feel “different” because virtually all the

students are “different”, and 3.) Each student is part of a small home room group that meets

frequently with a teacher who closely monitors and follows-up on progress or the lack thereof.

Thus, close constraint, sympathetic attention, and rapid intervention keep the sometimes

recalcitrant scholars on the road of Recovery.

3. Restoration. Success breeds hope and hope breeds plans. Although the process is hardly

linear or smooth, the student is restored, both in skills and attitude. Academic rebuilding of

courses, grades, and aptitude, is the significant achievement, but it is not singular. The student

begins to feel at home: the Director is engaged and is present; the teachers call home;

extracurriculars, e.g. sports, government, prom committee, etc. seek the student out for help.

Graduation is no longer a dream; it is a reality. And, with increased support from the Richard

Milburn program Innovative Elements, the student contemplates a broader, brighter, post-

graduate horizon of entering a career or a post secondary institution.

4. Redirection. The goal of the Richard Millburn program and experience is full preparation

for entering a career, or a post-secondary institution. Thus graduation is a means, not an end, and

the full counseling and academic resources of the RMA Innovative Components are deployed to

create a Redirection in the student’s life.

5. Design Costs. RMA has provided public and private alternative educational services for

high need students for the past ten years. Recognizing the need for nontraditional education

programs for high need students, RMA develops charter alliance arrangements with public

school systems seeking to enhance and supplement their existing alternative programs for high

need students. The RMA Model, is cost effective as it has demonstrated significant results for a


Page e35

U282M110023 0023

17

per student cost less than the public district’s average per student expenditures, and, in fact, less

than other charter schools.

Two recent reports comparing charter and public school funding confirms what is already

known: Charter Schools are systematically under-funded when compared to their public school

counterparts throughout the nation receiving $2,247 less in 2006-07 (Ball State University 2010

study for Florida Consortium of Public Charter Schools) and the inequities are even greater in

Florida and Texas, as can be seen in Table 6.

TABLE 6: PER STUDENT REVENUE, 2006 – 07

Texas

All Public All Charter All RMA

$10,158 $9,141 $6,710

In Texas, RMA operates successful charter schools for $3,448 less than the public schools,

34% less than the public school revenue.

Although inputs have been proven to be an unsatisfactory predictor of student achievement

(Coleman, “Equality of Educational Opportunity”, 1966; Hanushek, “Conclusions and Controversies

about the Effectiveness of School Resources”, 2008), the “bare-bones” physical plant and the “no

frills” curriculum offered by RMA could benefit from a more equitable distribution of public monies,

particularly in recruiting high quality teachers, retaining them, and rewarding their superior

performance. The centrality of the teacher in improving and sustaining student learning is

undisputable (Woessmann, “Cross-Country Evidence on Teacher Performance Pay; 2010, paper

presented to Harvard Program on Education Policy and Governance).

6. The RMA Program Model

a. Basic Program Components


Page e36

U282M110023 0023

18

• Academic Core Curriculum: RMA adopts the local public high school curriculum to

ensure we meet state standards.

• Work Study: The School to Work Program (STW) includes

monitored/documented work study, career assessment/job preparation, pre-

employment counseling, external learning experiences, and career readiness.

• Remediation/Skill Building Classes: Reading, Writing, and Mathematics skill

tutoring are provided to increase student performance;

• Low Pupil Teacher Ratio: Direct instruction is focused on individual students with

an average ratio of 15 students to one certified teacher;

• Life Skills: Practical problem-solving techniques and Life Management Skills are

incorporated throughout the program

• Monitored Study: An individualized and evaluated program for students who

cannot be in class on a daily basis.

b. Innovative Program Components

The model builds on previous successes at RMA with the following additional elements:

i. Milburn High School OnLine: Milburn High School Online (MHSO) is accredited by the

Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), AdvancEd and the Distance Education

Training Council (DETC). MHSO offers core courses developed in accordance with national

standards and aligned with state standards, and elective courses. Milburn online courses are well

structured offering student activities and assignments clearly identified, as well as the ability to

complete work, submit assignments, and contribute to class discussion at anytime, anywhere.

Our courses offer both asynchronous and synchronous interactive learning environments and are

taught by teachers fully certified in the subject matter area. Additionally, our counseling and


Page e37

U282M110023 0023

19

administrative staff monitors and intervenes when students are not making timely progress or

completing course assignments. Certified subject matter teachers consistently interact with

students through instruction, classroom discussion, group projects and individual learning

opportunities using subject matter content provided through books and reading assignments

posted on the Internet.

The eCollege Learning Management System (LMS) delivery platform and the Bocavox

Maestro Student Information System (SIS) provide the cutting edge technology systems for

delivery and tracking data. MHSO averages an 80% or greater course completion rate which is a

direct result of using technology that is cutting edge and a program design that includes

consistent teacher involvement and interaction with students.

ii. Focus on Graduation and Post Secondary Success: High school graduation and

preparation for post-secondary success are the ultimate RMA goals for our students. RMA staff

members are committed to setting high expectations, holding our students accountable for their

performance and behavior, and individualizing instruction to help each student complete high

school, and reach their academic and career goals. RMA instruction incorporates life skills and

educational skills throughout the curriculum that enable our students to succeed. Dual enrollment

and advanced placement cause are options at RMA, which offer students exposure to post

secondary experience and additional credit options.

The RMA Graduation Coach provides the motivation and support students and parents need

to stay focused on reaching the student’s full potential and educational goal of graduation and

post-secondary education/training/career. The Graduation Coach provides guidance, direction

and reassurance to students as they move toward graduation and life after high school; gives

parents information and assistance with supporting their child, understanding information about

post secondary opportunities and how to make/complete applications for continuing education


Page e38

U282M110023 0023

20

and federally funded programs.

iii. Portfolios: Portfolios that are documented and validated learning experiences provide a

unique opportunity for Richard Milburn Academy students to showcase past and current

accomplishments. Students not only collect and demonstrate their work but also must

examine and communicate what they have learned when and how, as well as what difference this

learning has made in their lives. Because portfolios represent life experiences the process can be

highly motivational and rewarding for the student. Students receive guidance and direction to insure

the value of the experience and qualified Richard Milburn staff evaluate the validity of the portfolio

to ensure a rigorous process with the high standards for which all students are accountable.

iv. Experiential Learning: The Richard Milburn Academy program stresses experiential leaning

because hands-on student centered instructional activities are effective with our student

population. Leaning needs to be relevant and useful to students, otherwise there is little motivation

to become involved in the process. Students who have struggled in a traditional setting need

approaches to learning that have value for them, which is why our teachers devote time and energy

to ensure they are using teaching strategies to meet the diverse needs of our diverse student

population. Richard Milburn teachers collaborate to create a learning environment where students

recognize the value of the learning situation to their own life, and therefore become engaged in the

process, increase their knowledge/skills and are ready for the next related learning experience.

v. Non-traditional Scheduling Options: Richard Milburn offers flexible scheduling allowing

students, who have many factors outside school effecting and interfering with their education, a

way to complete high school that is generally not available in traditional settings. Schedules can be

staggered to accommodate student’s work schedules or family/childcare needs with staggered

starting times in the morning, early afternoon, and early evening. Block scheduling is available and

provides an option for students who need to complete courses in one


Page e39

U282M110023 0023

21

semester. Additionally, Milburn High School Online courseware is available for both course

credit and remediation.

The RMA model yields success that is cost effective and affordable across the United States.

Certainly, a model could be successful at a much higher cost per student, but the GO CAREER!

GO COLLEGE! model provides a program for $6,000 to $7,000 per student that produces

extraordinary successes for high need students. The GO CAREER! GO COLLEGE! model can

be easily replicated in any district to serve a large proportion of their high need population.

GO CAREER! GO COLLEGE! Project Partners

The primary external partners in this project are Agile Mind, Incorporated and AVID,

Incorporated. The Agile Mind system is grounded in the Charles A. Dana Center's years of

research and experience nurturing high achievement in mathematics and science. The system

builds on Dana Center studies of high-performing, high-poverty schools and districts, including

schools with exemplary high-enrollment AP calculus programs for traditionally underserved

students. The products of the Center's work, which include the Advanced Placement Program®

Mathematics Vertical Teams Toolkit and the Advanced Placement Capacity Assessment Tool (both

developed for the College Board), have set the standard of excellence for supporting successful AP

programs. Agile Mind has conducted research analyzing empirical data from more than 900,000

student users and more than 15,000 educator users of the system’s online services – and results

show significant gains for students in both math and science. Beyond these national results, the

Corpus Christi RMA campus has worked closely with Agile Mind since 2008 to improve student

math scores, and the results have been phenomenal – raising student proficiency rates on the TAKS

mathematics assessment from 20% to 95%.

Mathematics:


Page e40

U282M110023 0023

22

Agile Mind has promoted great success for RMA students in mathematics since 2008.

Committed to excellence, equity, and sustainable school capacity, Agile Mind’s mission is to

provide the programs, tools and instructional improvement systems needed to transform student

engagement and achievement through exemplary, sustainable teaching practices. When Agile

Mind first began working with the RMA Corpus Christi campus in 2008, only 20% of students

were earning proficient scores on the TAKS math assessment. With intensive teacher trainings, the

implementation of evidence-based educational tools, and technology-based learning resources all

provided through Agile Mind, 95% of Corpus Christi students earned a proficient score on the

TAKS math assessment in 2010.

Science:

Agile Mind also enhances both equity and high achievement in science. RMA will integrate

the evidence-based science educational tools, intensive teacher trainings, and technology-based

learning resources necessary to dramatically increase the rigor of core science offerings, and prepare

students to succeed at the Advanced Placement level. Agile Mind's science programs were

developed in collaboration with the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study group, which has been

nationally recognized for its excellence in science education, and the Charles A. Dana Center at The

University of Texas at Austin, widely respected for its contribution to significant gains in student

achievement in mathematics and science.

The Agile Assessment component of both the math and science programs provide teachers with

high quality assessment tools that are expertly aligned to standards, objectives, and Agile Mind

course support services – providing teachers and administrators with the resources to evaluate

student understanding of concepts and skills necessary for mastery of learning standards, success on

high-stakes exams, and proficiency in Biology, Algebra I and Geometry. The direct alignment of


Page e41

U282M110023 0023

23

each assessment item to Agile Mind course support material offers educators a comprehensive

integrated curriculum and instructional support.

AVID (Advancement Via Individual Determination) is an evidence-based college readiness

system that is designed to increase school-wide learning and performance. The AVID system

accelerates student learning, uses research-based methods of effective instruction, provides

meaningful and motivational professional development, and acts as a catalyst for systemic reform

and change. Although AVID serves all students, it focuses on the least served students in the

academic middle. The formula is simple - raise expectations of students and, with the AVID

support system in place, they will rise to the challenge. What differentiates AVID from other

educational reform programs is its astounding success rate. Since 1990, more than 85,500 AVID

students have graduated from high school and planned to attend college. Of the 22,210 AVID 2010

seniors who reported their plans, 91.3% intended to attend a postsecondary institution, 58.3% in

four-year institutions and 33.0% in two-year institutions. These results are what RMA desires for

its students.

State-funded, independent research, together with AVID's own data, validate that the AVID

college-readiness system works. Data shows that AVID students are more likely to take AP classes,

complete their college eligibility requirements, and get into four-year colleges than students who

don't take AVID. Almost all AVID students who participate for at least three years are accepted to

college, with roughly three quarters getting into four-year universities. AVID also helps ensure

students, once accepted to college, possess the higher-level skills they need for college success.

Particularly attractive to the Richard Milburn Academies, is the fact that AVID targets

students in the academic middle - B, C, and even D students - who have the desire to go to college

and the willingness to work hard. Like RMA, AVID recognizes that these are students who are

capable of completing rigorous curriculum but are falling short of their potential. The typical AVID


Page e42

U282M110023 0023

24

student looks very similar to the typical RMA student: they are typically first in their families to

attend college, and are from low-income or minority families. Through AVID, RMA will be

prepared to advance these students from current unchallenging courses into a college track.

7. Goals, Objectives, and Outcomes

The Goals, Objectives, and Outcomes of the project are described in Table 7:

Goals Objectives Outcomes Measures Goal 1: Introduce the Corpus Christi, Texas Charter School Model into six new Texas school districts: Spring ISD, Arlington ISD, Victoria ISD, Pasadena ISD, Aldine ISD and Round Rock ISD.

Obj. 1.3: Develop individual timelines for 6 potential academies. Obj. 1.2: Determine program sites. Obj. 1.3: Hire program staff. Obj. 1.4: Increase the number of at need students served by 60%, from 1,700 to 4,000

Outcome 1.1: Establish 6 new Academies by end of project period. Outcome 1.2: Enroll 2,300 students in 6 new academies in determined ISDs by end of project period.

Number of charter schools established during project period. Locations of charter schools. Number of students enrolled.

Goal 2: Improve CMO project management and school-based programs through continuous feedback loop of interim measures of progress toward outcome goals of: • 90% graduation rate • 60% career rate • 30% career

preparation rate

Obj. 3.1: Establish outcome goal collection methods and timelines. Obj. 3.2: Establish regular meetings for review of data.

Outcome 3.1: Establish a continuous feedback loop by end of project period. Objective 3.2: Meet outcome goals of 90% graduation rate, 60% career rate, and 30% career preparation rate.

Data Collection method established. Meetings regarding feedback loop established at regular intervals. Graduation rate, career rate and career preparation rate data.

Goal 3: Validate teacher and administrator performance incentive plans (EPIC) utilized by RMH charter management since 2004.

Obj. 4.1: Determine EPIC plan measures. Objective 4.2: Establish focus teacher and administrator focus groups.

Objective 4.1: Determine validity of EPIC plans. Objective 4.2: Determine changes to EPIC plan in terms of either substance or administration.

Student and charter school achievement rates. Data regarding individual teachers tied to student achievement. Focus group data regarding EPIC plans.

Table 7


Page e43

U282M110023 0023

25

D. Management Plan.

1. The adequacy of the management plan

Past performance is the single best predicator of future success. All four organizations involved

in this proposal, the prime contractor Richard Milburn Academy of Texas, Inc. and the sub-

contractors, Richard Milburn Academy of Florida, NESI, Inc., and Resource Management

Corporation, Inc., have operated charter schools or evaluated large social programs in the field for

decades.

In both Florida and Texas over the past eleven years years, Richard Milburn CMO has opened

17 schools in 15 districts, increased enrollment from 81 in the first year to nearly 3,000 this school

year, negotiated 25 school building leases, hired 29 school directors, and increased the teaching

staff from 9 to 263. This substantial growth was accomplished in “school districts” of incredible

size. The RMA, TX schools stretch from Beaumont to Odessa, Amarillo to Corpus Christi,

encompassing a geographic region larger than New England and New York combined. In Florida,

the schools range from Daytona to Ft. Myers in the south and Bradenton in the west, a region larger

than Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island combined. Richard Milburn CMO staff know

how to scale up, maintain and grow charter schools efficiently and effectively. Table 8 addresses

specific requirements of the federal funding:

Application Requirement How It’s Addressed

a. Describe replication/expansion objectives, and the methods to be used.

RMA plans to significantly open 6 additional academies under the proposed project. Work to open these 5 academies will begin immediately, to bring to fruition within the project period.


Page e44

U282M110023 0023

26


b. Describe how you currently manage your schools, and how you will manage your new schools, including central office functions, governance, daily operations, financial management, human resources management, and instructional management

RMA academies are currently managed through supervised, standardized, but decentralized management tied into a cohesive, data-driven network. Each academy is managed according to a single set of principles through a common guidebook communicated and reinforced by training. Every school prepares a yearly self-assessment to demonstrate their compliance with RMA requirements, government, regulations, accrediting standards, and state and national standards.

c. Describe how you will ensure that each school will receive its commensurate share of Federal “formula” funds.

Federal “formula” funds for RMA schools are applied for and managed centrally, by the Chief Financial Officer, to ensure that each school receives its commensurate share. Since RMA’s founding all external audits have been exemplary.

d. Describe the educational program and how it will enable all students (including “educationally disadvantaged” to meet State standards; grade levels/ages, curriculum and instructional practices.

The Educational Program is described in the Quality of Design section.

e. Describe relation between new schools and chartering agency.

We will assist all schools in obtaining their own charter.

f. Describe sustainability after Federal grant ends.

RMA is designed to be sustainable through normal state and Federal funding. RMA’s ability to attract private donations, corporate partnerships and volunteers enhances the schools’ operations.

g. Describe parent and community involvement in planning, design, and implementation.

Every RMA school is designed and operated by its own community for its unique environment. Although most current RMA schools are situated in at-risk areas, every one has unique characteristics determined by the location and student population. RMA holds stakeholder meetings to determine programing, site selection and other need aspects of the new charter schools. When many of the initial plans have been determined, community meetings are then held to gather additional information,


Page e45

U282M110023 0023

27


h. Request and justify waivers of Federal regulations needed to achieve desired results.

There are no required waivers of federal regulations for RMA.

i. Describe how grant funds will be used in conjunction with other Federal funds and matching funds.

The funds to be spent under this grant will be used to accelerate the dissemination of RMA schools. The funding under this grant will permit each RMA school to open at a more rapid pace than heretofore possible, enabling the benefits of RMA learning to reach more children more quickly.

j. Describe your equal-opportunity marketing plan.

When we open a school, we market the school openly and broadly to the local community, distributing flyers in the languages common in the community, holding open houses, and community gatherings. We distribute flyers to nearby apartments and homes. For each of the new schools, we will always include equal opportunity notices and laws.

l. Describe how you will comply with Disabilities Education Act

We will comply in every way. RMA has always been known for having a high percentage of children with disabilities. Because of our attention to the needs of every child, we have become known as the school that will embrace students that other schools shun or discourage from attending.

m. Describe significant issues in student safety, financial management, statutory/regulatory compliance (significant = could lead to revocation of charter).

RMA has no significant issues in student safety, financial management, or statutory/regulatory compliance.

n. Provide objective data showing applicant quality.

Data is described in Section A.1, A.2, and A.3 (Quality of the Eligible Applicant).

Table 8

Project Structure and Process. Structure.

a. This is a far-flung and complex project with many moving parts. However, the


Page e46

U282M110023 0023

28

principals in each organization have extensive experience in such field operations, going

as far back as the first field experiment of an educational program, the $20M two year

nationwide field test of Performance Contracting in education, 1969- 1971.

b. Process. Based upon previous experience in opening charter schools in multiple site

simultaneously, a multi-task start up plan in Table 9 has been developed, predicated on a

September 2011 award notification. The division of labor within the project, as outlined

in Table 9, is as follows:

Government Relations and Governance: Charter Authorization, Permitting, Grant

Managements, Reporting Business Operations: Facility Construction, Leases, Insurance, Banking,

Equipment and Supplies, IT.

Human Resources: Counseling. Recruiting, Hiring, Training Financial: Budgeting, Procurement, Payroll, Accounting, Audit, Reporting.

School Management: Enrollment, Program Implementation, Curriculum,

Evaluations.


Page e47

U282M110023 0023

29

TASK RESPONSIBILITY COMPLETION

DATE A. GOVERNANCE RELATIONS/GOVERNANCE 1 Negotiate/Sign Grant Project Manager 10/2012 2 Charter Expansion Negotiate Directors, 12/2012 3 Charter Contracts Negotiate/Sign Project Manager 1/2013 4 LEA/Local Authority Contacts Directors 1/2013 5 State/Federal Communication Project Manager On-Going 6 Annual D.C. 2 Day Meeting Project Manager TBD 7 Recruit/Meet Charter Holder Board Project Manger/Director 1/2013 B. BUSINESS OPERATIONS 1 Sites Locations, Negotiated Leases RMHS Contracts 2/2013 2 Leases Signed Project Manager 2/2013 3 Design – Buildout RMHS Contracts 7/2013 4 Obtain CO’s RMHS Contracts 7/2013 5 Purchase Furniture, Equipment, Supplies,

Services, I.T. Directors 8/2013

6 Insurance, Property, Liability, Casualty, Signed

RMHS Financial 6/2013

7 Bank Accounts, LOC Signed RMHS Financial 6/2013 8 Process Purchase Orders For Start Up

Office Supplies and Equipment Operations/Regional Director

4/2013

9 Ensure Telephone Installation Operations/Regional Director

4/2013

10 Receive Equipment And Supplies Operations/Regional Director

5/2013

11 Forward Inventory Listing Equipment and Supplies to the Business Assistant at the Regional Office

School Director 6/2013

12 Process Purchase Orders For Administration, Teacher, And Student Computers

Operations/Technology Staff

6/2013

13 Ensure Training For Administration, Teacher, And Student Computers

Operations/Technology Staff

7/2013

14 Distribute RMA Policies & Procedure

Contract Administration 7/2013

15 Distribute Quick Reference Manual Contract Administration 7/2013


Page e48

U282M110023 0023

30

16 Distribute Contract Deliverables Itemized Contract Administration 8/2013

17 Distribute School Board Policy Manual Contract Administration 8/2013

C. HUMAN RESOURCES 1 Hire School Directors H.R. and Directors

FL/TX 4/2013

2 Determine Salary Schedules and Benefits Package

H.R. and Project Manager 4/2013

3 Determine Project Staffing H.R. and Project Manager 11/2012

4 Finalize Manager Recruiting (National, Local)

Human Resources 12/2012

5 Finalize Support Staff Recruiting (National, Local) Clerical, Business Operations, Administrative Assistant, Security, Educational Aides


6 Finalize educational staff recruiting (National, Local) Teachers, Work Study Coordinator, Counselor/Social Worker


7 Conduct Interviews Human Resources and Directors

4/2013

8 Initiate Personnel Action Forms Regional Director 4/2013 9 Conduct Background Investigations: Police Human Resources 5/2013 10 Complete Qualification Documentation Human Resources 5/2013 11 Ensure liability insurance be in force prior

to any school employee engaging in work related activities

Human Resources and Executive Management

6/2013

12 Complete Hiring Process Regional Director and Human Resources

6/2013

13 Process completed Personal Action Form Regional Director and Human Resources

6/2013

14 Process Personnel Files Regional Director and Human Resources

6/2013

15 Brief Employees On Benefit & Pay Procedures

Finance & Human Resources

7/2013


Page e49

U282M110023 0023

31

D. FINANCIAL

1 Ensure the financial operations meet or exceed the same standards of the school district.

Executive Management 12/2012

2 Ensure the types & limits of insurance the school plans to obtain are adequate


3 Ensure the budget allocates sufficient funds to cover the cost of insurance


4 Obtain State Authority To Do Business Controller 12/2012 E. SCHOOL MANAGEMENT 1 Revise Comprehensive Competency Based

Curriculum And Standards to align with District’s & state content standards.

Program Development Staff

4/2013

2 Revise Comprehensive Competency Based Assessment System to indicate specific indicators of success, measurable objectives, and annual targets for success.


4/2013

3 Revise School Improvement Planning Procedures.


5/2013

4 Schedule Founders And Board Of Trustees Retreat/Orientation To Educational Goals,


6/2013

5 Distribute Comprehensive Competency Based Curriculum And Standards.


6/2013

6 Distribute Comprehensive Competency Based Assessment System.


7/2013

7 Schedule Management Program Orientation


6/2013

8 Schedule Staff and Teacher Orientation Program Development Staff

6/2013

9 Conduct Staff and Teacher Program Orientation


7/2013

10 Distribute Student Handbooks to School Program Development Staff

7/2013

11 Distribute Student Handbooks to Parents of Students before students may submit formal applications to attend RMA

Managers 4/2013

12 Revise Procedural Safeguards Policies & Procedures


5/2013

13 Revise Due Process Hearings Policies & Procedures


4/2013

14 Revise Prior Written Notice Policies & Procedures


4/2013

15 Revise Confidentiality Of Records Policies & Procedures


4/2013


Page e50

U282M110023 0023

32

16 Revise Suspension Expulsion Policies & Procedures


4/2013

17 Forward Evaluation Policies & Procedures Program Development Staff

6/2013

18 Revise the Student Handbook, ensuring student discipline and attendance plans are adequate and comply with federal and state law


6/2013

19 Revise the Student Handbook outlining student rights and responsibilities and the school attendance policy shall be complete and distributed at the time students first register to attend classes


6/2013

20 Submit a complete course of study for the project, indicating each subject at each grade the school will offer during its first three years of operation. The course of study shall demonstrate alignment with State content standards


6/2013

21 Distribute Student Handbooks Program Development Staff

6/2013

22 Conduct a lottery for student admissions if more students enroll than the project is approved to admit


23 Develop SY Schedules [Teacher’s Evaluations, Staff Meetings, Etc.]


24 Develop Master Schedule School Director 8/2013 25 Develop Staff Assignments School Director 7/2013 26 Finalize Emergency Procedures School Director 7/2013 27 Conduct Student Baseline Assessments Counselors/Teachers 8/2013 28 Ensure Implementation of Standard

Operating Procedures Regional/School Directors

8/2013

29 Conduct Student Records Review School Director/ Counselors

8/2013

30 Initiate Student Interviews School Director/ Counselors

7/2013

31 Inform Staff of Standard Operating Procedures


F. EVALUATION 1 Revise Evaluation Plan CBI Research Staff 1/2013

2 Develop Map of Essential Elements of

l i d l

CBI Research Staff 2/2012 – 4/2012

3 Develop Implementation Fidelity Measures CBI Research Staff 4/2013 – 6/2013

4 Develop Questionnaire and Interview

f h l ff


5 Develop Operational Definitions of Student and School Outcomes



Page e51

U282M110023 0023

33

6 Collect Initial Implementation Data CBI Research Staff 6/2013 – 7/2013 7 Analyze Data CBI Research Staff 8/2013 8 Write and Submit Year 1 Evaluation

CBI Research Staff 8/2013

Table 9

2. The business plan for improving and sustaining schools.

Management and program are data-driven. The historical data for the past decade were

accumulated and analyzed by RMA and employed in personnel and program decisions. Enrollment and

attendance data are distributed weekly, directing staffing, budgeting, recruiting refinements in real time.

A copy of the RMA weekly attendance report is included as Attachment 7.

RMA charter schools are a constant financial challenge, with sub-par state financing, a

fluctuating enrollment, and an attendance rate that necessitates close monitoring and follow up.

Consequently, a Monthly Financial Statement and accompanying analysis is prepared for RMA senior

management. This report combines staffing; financial activities for the month, quarter, year and

cumulative; and financial position.

Hiring, evaluation, promotion and salary decisions are based upon performance; not on

credentials or years of experience. All personnel decisions down to the classroom are made by the CMO

staff with substantial input from the School Directors. RMA considers its unique Educational

Performance Incentive Compact (EPIC) as the cement that holds the CMO together.

It not only recognizes and rewards school-site performance but also, through decisions as to what

criteria will be rewarded in any given year, keeps all employee attention focused upon the larger,

corporate picture. Thus, for example, School Directors might be rewarded for financial performance and

attendance in a year that the CMO selects surplus and growth as critical corporate objectives. That same

year all teachers might be rewarded for student test performance and daily attendance.

Attachment 7 presents the EPIC Plan for the 2005-06 school year in Texas. In that school year,

the directors’ performance bonus averaged 9% of their salary; and the teachers’ performance bonus

averaged 6% of salary. A total of $183,000 in performance bonuses was awarded. More importantly, the


Page e52

U282M110023 0023

34

Texas criteria for student performance that year were exceeded, placing RMA schools well ahead of the

Texas Alternative Education Accountability test.

3. A multi-year financial and operating model

RMA proposes to open and operate six charter schools with approximately 1,200 high need

students to provide strong evidence of our success. Our track record shows that RMA can accomplish

this task.

Capacity: In order to develop and bring to scale the proposed project, the organization must

have the capacity to expand. A small organization no matter how effective their project may be may

not have the capacity to expand. The RMA Team has this capacity in terms of corporate

administration, revenue size, and bank loan capabilities.

RMA and its partners have 1,300 employees supported by more than 80 administrative

staff including Management (18), Human Resources (20), Accounting/Finance (40), and Facilities (2)

serving approximately 2,700 high need students. The RMA Team has been in business for more than

ten years, has a combined net worth of more than $3.0 million, a bank line of credit of $2.0 million,

and the demonstrated capacity to perform this project. Furthermore, the quality and experience of our

management team demonstrate that RMA has the management capacity to develop our model and

bring it to scale. RMA’s model, GO CAREER! GO COLLEGE! for high need high school students

can be operated within the average school district per pupil costs. The best predictor of future

corporate growth and sustainability is past performance, and RMA has an enviable record in Florida

and Texas.

The ten year academic record has been established in the preceding pages of this proposal.

These accomplishments, achieved through steady growth despite inadequate state funding, are based

upon the CMO’s management style: nimble, responsive and parsimonious. And, we are confident that

these time-tested qualities will enable RMA to go to scale swiftly at the conclusion of this project.

Table 11 contains the audited financial results for FY2009 for RMA, Inc., RMA, TX, and RMA, FL,


Page e53

U282M110023 0023

35

the three CMO groups. These financial results are certified by the public accounting finance BKHM,

PA of Winter Park, FL. The healthy balance sheet for each organization is testimony to the CMO’s

management skill and clearly indicates its ability to go to scale.

TABLE 10: RMA, INC; RMA, TX; RMA, FL, FY2009

Cumulative Net Assets

RMA, Inc. $447,096

RMA, TX $1,663,197

RMA, FL $1,061,1476

TOTAL $3,171,769


Page e54

U282M110023 0023

36

4. The plan for closing charter schools affiliated with the applicant. The plan for closing charter schools is as follows in Table 11:

TASK RESPONSIBLE COMPLETION DATE

1 Review Performance Data Project Management

2 Discuss Data with Governing Agencies

Project Management

3 Review with Legal Counsel Project Management

4 Recommend to Charter Holder Board Project Management

5 Notify Agencies of Board Action Project Management

6 Prepare Public Announcements Project Management

7 Notify Local Charter Board Project Management

8 Notify School Personnel Project Management

9 Notify Students/Parents School Director

10 Media Relations School Director

11 Negotiate Lease Buy-Out Project Management

12 Notify/Negotiate Suppliers/Creditors Project Management

13 Conduct Students’ Counseling School Director

14 Arrange Students’ Transitions School Director

15 Final Inventory of Federally Purchased Equipment

Project Management

16 School Records (Student, Financial, Personnel) Inventoried and Forwarded to Records Management Site

Project Management

17 Secure Building Project Director

18 Discuss Equipment Disposal with Government Agencies

Project Management

19 Dispose of Equipment School Director

20 Conduct Financial Exit Audit by Public Auditor

Project Management

Table 11


Page e55

U282M110023 0023

37

5. The qualifications of the project team

Management Teams. The companies submitting this proposal have all been in existence

for a maximum of 30 years to a minimum of eleven. They have also worked together in various

configurations in previous large-scale projects. The highlights of the key staff are:

RMA, TX. Prime Contractor: Peter Briggs, Project Director, has been President of RMA since January 2004. Mr. Briggs

education includes a M.A., in American History and an ABD in education from Stanford

University; a M.Ed., in Secondary Education from Johns Hopkins University, and an A.B. in

Government from Harvard University. He served as Headmaster at the Greenhill School in

Addison, Texas, 1992-2000, during which time he supervised a staff of 215, with 1,250

students, an annual budget of $16.5M. Prior to Texas, he was Headmaster at Greenwich

Country Day School in Greenwich, Connecticut, 1976-1992. From 1968-1973, Mr. Briggs

opened two educational research and development firms in Washington, D.C. and from 1973 –

1976, he was Deputy Assistant Secretary for Dissemination concentrating on voucher

experiments in the National Institute of Education.

Sally Irvine, Assistant Regional Director for RMA Texas since 2009. Ms. Irvine works closely

with the management team in the daily operations and in planning for future growth for the

Charter Schools in Texas. She has twenty years experience in education and management, and

was the recipient of Texas’ Region 2’s 2008 Outstanding Administrator Award. Ms. Irvine has

a School Administrator Training Masters from PEL 4 Training, Region 2 Service Center and a

B.S. in Elementary Education from Texas Tech University

Chantell Denson, Assistant Project Manager. Ms Denson’s experience over two decades in

education ranges from teaching to school principalship to district-wide supervision. She

worked for RMA in Texas from 2000 to 2006, serving as a School Director, PEIMS


Page e56

U282M110023 0023

38

Coordinator, and Director of Accountability and Compliance. Currently working in

Wyoming, Ms. Denson is returning to Texas.

NESI, Subcontractor for Finance and Operations. Donna Eldridge has been Vice President since

1990. As Vice President, High School Division, Ms. Eldridge is responsible for the total

operational and educational components of all schools in the High School Division, the

development and start-up of newschools and programs, and the provision of administrative

services to all Richard Milburn charter schools. Ms. Eldridge has a Masters in Education,

Guidance and Counseling from Providence College, Rhode Island.

Gregory Shields has been Director, Distance Education since 1999. Mr. Shields supports the

Division Director in the application of distance learning technologies for staff training and

develops and implements policy for company distance learning initiatives, including Milburn

High School Online. Mr. Shields has more than 20 years experience in the field of education,

primarily adult education programs with the U.S. Marine Corps where he served as Director,

Voluntary Education. His education includes: a Masters of Arts Guidance and Counseling from

Virginia Tech and a BA Bachelor of Arts in Business Education from Marshall University.

Edla Hodgeson has been Director, Human Resources since 1997. As Director of Human

Resources, Ms Hodgeson coordinates policy and procedure guidelines, recruiting and selection

of personnel, employee benefits and relations, compliance issues and other relate

activities. Her experience includes six years as Employee Relations Manager and Human

Resources Manager for an international technical contracting firm. Ms. Hodgeson is a member

of the Northeast Human Resources Association. She holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in History

from the University of Connecticut. David Morrissette has been Chief Financial Officer since 2004. Mr. Morrissette holds a

Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from Bentley College, Waltham, Massachusetts. Mr.


Page e57

U282M110023 0023

39

Morrissette has more than twenty years experience in the accounting field which includes

Finance Manager/Division Controller with Acterna Corporation; Controller for New England

Technology Group, Inc.; and Controller for Winchester Healthcare Enterprise, Inc.

Dr. Greg Muller is the Principal Evaluator for Capacity Builders, Inc., and will lead the

evaluation effort. Dr. Muller holds his Master’s and Ph.D. in Sociology from Brigham Young

University and Texas A&M. He has more than 20 years experience working as a lead evaluator

with the US Department of Health and Human Services and the US Department of Education for

such programs as: Community Based Abstinence Education, Drug Free Communities, and the

Juvenile Mentoring Program. Dr. Muller is also a published author whose work spans such topics

as: Family Dynamics and Divorce, Conflict Resolution in Youth Mentoring and Prevention

Programs, the Importance of Goal Setting in Youth Prevention Education, and Engaging the At

Risk Child. Dr. Muller and his team of 18 doctorate level evaluators from at Capacity Builders,

Incorporated have successfully provided summative and formative evaluation services to

numerous federally funded projects to address issues related to student achievement and child

outcomes.

E. Evaluation Plan

To ensure the reliability and validity of project strategies and outcomes, Richard Milburn

Academy will utilize the expertise of an external evaluation firm with experience in evaluating

federally funded grant projects designed to improve student achievement. Capacity Builders, Inc.

was selected to conduct a multi-faceted evaluation plan with the aim of understanding the

particular aspects of the project that are effective in establishing high quality charter schools. We

will also examine activities that are effective in promoting achievement for disadvantaged

students. Capacity Builders, Inc. is particularly qualified to lead the evaluation. The lead project

investigator, Dr. Greg Muller has a Ph.D. in sociology providing unique insight and


Page e58

U282M110023 0023

40

understanding of the social, economic, and circumstantial barriers that impact the educational

experiences of disadvantaged, at-risk students, and their peers who are making adequate

academic progress.

The mission of Capacity Builders, Inc. is also closely aligned to the legislative intent of

the funding opportunity. The mission of Capacity Builders, Inc. is to improve organizations and

government efficiency in implementing programs by collecting and analyzing data towards a

continuous cycle of improvement. Funds received under the federal project will improve

educational quality on our campuses leading to improved academic outcomes for students, which

is a core component of the funding opportunity. Dr. Muller has specific experience in this type of

evaluation, having worked with charter schools in the past.

Capacity Builders, Inc. will undertake data collection, analysis, and reporting processes

that identify the systemic issues that positively lead us towards our goals and elements that are

barriers to our success. The project will use process and outcome evaluation techniques that link

data to project outcomes, discover patterns within the project implementation, and identify causal

relationships among the objectives and associated goals.

The proposed evaluation is intended to provide comprehensive formative and

summative information about the implementation and effectiveness of the proposed model for

adding new charter schools in six schools districts in two states. RMA is interested in receiving

detailed feedback about the implementation of its model in the six proposed new charter

schools, especially during the first several years, so that modifications can be made to improve

the implementation of the model. RMA is also interested in obtaining comprehensive

information about the effectiveness of these schools in meeting a variety of performance

objectives based on student outcomes, especially in the last 2-3 years of the grant period, so


Page e59

U282M110023 0023

41

that information will be available to inform decisions about possible replications of this model.

The second major component of the proposed evaluation design is to determine the

effectiveness of the new charter schools in meeting performance objectives measured by various

student outcomes. The evaluation will focus on the attainment of measurable objectives as

opposed to assessing “impact” since the nature of the Charter School Program does not lend

itself to experimental or quasi-experimental designs that permit the determination of how

students enrolled in new charter schools would perform had they not been enrolled in such

schools. On the other hand, where possible and meaningful, this evaluation will make

comparisons between students attending the RMA schools and other schools. In addition, the

evaluation will examine changes in the level of student outcomes over time to determine the

amount of progress the schools are making in addressing the academic needs of students.

The student outcomes that will be measured include attendance, graduation, dropping

out, and suspension/expulsion, as well as performance on state assessments the TAKS in Texas

in at least reading/language arts and mathematics. One of the early evaluation activities will be

to work with RMA staff to establish performance objectives based on these measures for each of

the new schools. In addition, a system for comparing the new schools’ performance on these

measures with other, similar schools based on school report cards will be developed. Finally,

these measures and others such as enrollment and number of staff will be tracked each year to

determine the progress each school has made during the grant period. Since the six schools will

not be completely operational until the second year of the grant period, the evaluation will focus

on the procedures for collecting student outcome data during the first year. The first annual

evaluation report will contain only information about the systems developed for measuring these

outcomes. Subsequent annual evaluation reports will contain summative information about the

effectiveness of the schools in terms of the student outcomes. The evaluation plan is described


Page e60

U282M110023 0023

42

in Table 12:

Goals Data Collected Milestones Target

Goal 1: Introduce the Corpus Christi, Texas Charter School Model into six new Texas school districts: Spring ISD, Arlington ISD, Victoria ISD, Pasadena ISD, Aldine ISD and Round Rock ISD.

RMA school opening plans and tracking. Enrollment records. Charter documentation, and documentation related to individual sites. Enrollment data collected and reported each quarter, training, exams, attendance records collected monthly, analyzed quarterly, and reported in quarterly program improvement and formal annual reports.

Opening of individual schools. Hiring of individual school staff. Enrollment of students at each school. Incremental enrollment growth over 5 year project period to reach 60% total growth.

Establish 6 new Richard Milburn Academies by end of project period. Serve an additional 2,300 at need students in Texas.

Goal 2: Improve CMO project management and school-based programs through continuous feedback loop of interim measures of progress toward outcome goals of 90% graduation rate, 60% career rate, and 30% career preparation rate.

RMA student records. TEA student and school records.

Review of measures of progress by CMO executive team. Development of regular reports for CMO executive team and relevant staff.

Develop a feedback loop for all RMA schools.

Goal 3: Validate teacher and administrator performance incentive plans (EPIC) utilized by RMH charter management since 2004.

Teacher and Administrator focus group records and surveys. School and classroom achievement records.

Development of an EPIC analysis report. Information regarding EPIC distributed throughout the RMA system.

Determine the validity and impact of the EPIC plan. Make any needed adjustments to the plan to promote quality in the schools.


Page e61

U282M110023 0023

43


Page e62

U282M110023 0023

Other Attachment File(s)

* Mandatory Other Attachment Filename:

To add more "Other Attachment" attachments, please use the attachment buttons below.

Attachment 1, RMA.pdf

Add Mandatory Other Attachment Delete Mandatory Other Attachment View Mandatory Other Attachment

Add Optional Other Attachment Delete Optional Other Attachment View Optional Other Attachment


Page e63

U282M110023 0023

A 27 Congress Street, Shetland Park #310, Salem, MA 01970

Phone (978) 741-7161 • Fax (978) 741-0414


Attachment 1 - Resumes/Curriculum Vitae

Please refer to the resumes included in this section.

Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. 1. Peter Briggs 2. Sally Irvine 3. Chantell Denson

Richard Milburn High School 4. Robert Crosby 5. Donna Eldridge 6. David Morrisette 7. Edla Hodgeson 8. Gregory Shields 9. John Brown

RMC, Inc. 10. Allen Schenck 11. Jill Lammert 12. Deanna Kelley-Winstead Capacity Builders, Inc. 13. Greg Muller


Page e64

U282M110023 0023


Page e65

U282M110023 0023

"Use or disclosure of data on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation."

PETER G. BRIGGS President, Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. and Richard Milburn Academy of Texas, Inc.

EDUCATION:

M.A., American History, Stanford University M.Ed., Secondary Education, Johns Hopkins University A.B., Government, Harvard University

EXPERIENCE:

• President, Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. and Richard Milburn Academy of Texas, Inc.

Executive Manager of nine charter schools in Texas. Working with the Chief Education Officer, supervise a staff of 102 teachers at nine at-risk schools, 1,635 students, with an annual surplus of _.

• Headmaster, Greenhill School, Addison, Texas, 1992 - 2000. Supervised a staff of 215, with

1,250 students, an annual budget of $16.5M, and endowment of $17M. Raised $20M for plant, technology, security, and renovation or addition of 60% to the campus buildings. Middle school football and lacrosse coach.

• Headmaster, Greenwich Country Day School, Greenwich, Connecticut, 1976 - 1992.

Administered a private school with 750 students, 150 employees, an annual budget of $6.2M, and endowment of $7.1M. Raised $9.5M for faculty compensation, buildings, and financial aid. Middle school English and history teacher, football and ice hockey coach.

• Deputy Assistant Director, National Institute of Education, Washington, D.C., 1974 - 1976.

Developed and implemented national dissemination programs for school improvement. Special Assistant to the Director for Educational Laboratories and R&D Centers. Senior Associate, National Vouchers Program.

• Vice-President, Education Turnkey Systems and The Planar Corporation, Washington, D.C.,

1970-1974. Co-founder of both corporations. Developed, managed and supervised performance-based incentive plans for education and industry.

• Teaching Assistant, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1967 - 1969.

• History Teacher, Newton South High School, Newton, Massachusetts, 1964 - 1967.

COMMUNITY SERVICE:

2002 – 2005 Board of Directors, Cape Ann YMCA 1992 – 2000 Board of Directors, Boys and Girls Clubs of Dallas 1990 – 1993 Chairman, Advisory Council FIRST Program, U.S. Department of Education 1980 – 1992 Board of Directors, Greenwich Advisory Council on Youth and Drugs 1988 Chairman Community Division, United Way of Greenwich


Page e66

U282M110023 0023


SALLY IRVINE

EDUCATION:

Masters, School Administrator Training, PEL 4 Training, Region 2 Service Center B.S., Elementary Education, Texas Tech University

EXPERIENCE:

• School Director, Richard Milburn Academy, Corpus Christi, March 2005 to present. Responsible for the

marketing and growth of RMA, Corpus Christi throughout the area. Direct and manage the instructional program and supervising general operations for RMA, Corpus Christi. Monitor the instructional program by reviewing teacher lesson plans, observing classroom instruction on a regular basis, conferencing with staff, and carefully analyzing assessment data related to student academic performance. Provide educational leadership focused on improving student performance and program effectiveness. Work closely with the Regional Director and staff to plan, implement, and evaluate the curriculum on a systematic basis. Ensure implementation of high performance program offerings that maximize student opportunities. Develop and implement a plan to ensure utilization of technology to improve student, staff, and administrative productivity. Assist the Regional Director to provide appropriate curriculum/instruction staff development in a timely and effective manner.

• Superintendent, Costal Bend Youth City Charter School, 1998 to 2005. Responsible for school operations to include but not limited to: develop budgets, Title I application and expenditures: federal grants and IDEA Federal funds: conducting A.R.D.’s and developing I.E.P.’s: development, implement, and monitor the Campus Improvement Plan: PIEMS and E-Rate data, and hire and evaluate staff.

• Special Education Coordinator, Tuloso Midway I.S.D., 1996 to 1998. Responsible for all subject areas to emotionally disturbed students. Coordinated and conducted all A.R.D.'s at Middle School campus.

• Instructional Facilitator, Robstown I.S.D., 1995 to 1996. Responsible for the curriculum administration for the high school campus. TAAS Coordinator.

• Content Mastery, Copperas Cove, I.S.D., 1994 to 1995. Instructed all subject areas to intermediate level students.

• Director of Education, Charter Hospital, 1989 to 1994. Chief Administrator of at risk private school for children and adolescents. Provided in-service training for numerous Costal Bend School Districts regarding behavior disorders Received Gold Star Award from Southern Association of Schools and Colleges for Special Purpose Schools in 1993.

• Dean of Education, Southwest Texas Technical Institute, 1987-1989. Hired, dismissed, and evaluated faculty members. Responsible for all academic records within the institution.

• Teacher/Coach/Cheerleader Sponsor: Bastrop ISD, 1985-1987. English and Spanish instruction at the junior high level. Coached varsity tennis, freshman volleyball, and junior high cheerleading.

• Teacher, Athletic Director: Nazareth Academy, 1980-1985. English and Spanish instruction. Coached girls sports; Cheerleader and Drill Team sponsor.

• Teacher, Corpus Christi ISD, 1979-1980. Third grade teacher.


Page e67

U282M110023 0023

Chantell Denson 1

Chantell Jo Denson 1418 Montana Street

Rawlins, Wyoming 82301 307-321-6082 Cell

ACADEMIC PREPARATION

2003 M.Ed. in Education - Texas Tech University, Educational Leadership

1992 B.S. in Multidisciplinary Studies - Texas Tech University, Elementary

Education, Special Education All level

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE - ADMINISTRATIVE

Feb 2009 – Present Director of Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Technology

Carbon County School District #1 Implement and maintain the district-wide School Improvement Process including NCA Accreditation. Develop a system-wide plan for curriculum study and improvement consistent with the district vision, goals, and policies. Plan, develop, implement, and evaluate the curricular and instructional program of the district. Organize and review the results of curriculum committees, ensuring results are consistent with district objectives. Work with principals and teacher committees in organizing and coordinating grade level and department meetings in order to effect horizontal and vertical integration and articulation of the instructional program throughout the district. Interpret the present curriculum and proposed curriculum changes to the board, the administration, the staff, and the general public. Provide leadership and direction to the district for all educational programs including GT, CTE, Title I, IIA, IID, and III, Instructional Facilitators, and ESL. Monitor textbook and supplementary materials selection used in educational programs in the district. Direct the creation of and edit for publication all curriculum guides and materials prepared by and to be distributed among the instructional staff.

Supervise and coordinate district assessment program. Conduct and coordinate district-wide research and testing for measuring the effectiveness of the total educational program. Keep informed on the latest research, trends, and developments in all areas of education and interpret for staff as necessary.

Coordinate and monitor staff development and in-service activities for the education staff. Upon request of principals, observe teachers in their classrooms and offer insights for the enhancement of effective instruction. Supervise the educational technology program of the district including acquisition and usage for appropriate technology equipment. Play a significant leadership role in fostering professional growth and building staff morale throughout the district. Examine and develop graduation requirements and other educational standards and develop appropriate recommendations for revision consistent with district goals and within state requirements.

Attend board meetings and prepare reports and presentations for the board as the Superintendent may request. Assist in the development of district policies and administrative rules. Act in the absence of the Superintendent when so designated. Serve as a member of the Superintendent Advisory Council.


Page e68

U282M110023 0023

Chantell Denson 2

2008 – Jan. 2009 Assistant Principal Reese Education Center Frenship Independent School District

2007 – 2008 Assistant Director of Alternative Education

Evergreen Public Schools 2006 – 2007 Coordinator of Assessment

Frenship Independent School District 2004 – 2006 Director of Accountability and Compliance

Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. 2003 – 2004 Director of PEIMS and Special Education

Richard Milburn Academy, Inc 2000 – 2001 Interim School Director and Counselor

Richard Milburn Academy, Lubbock, Texas 2000 – 2003 Special Programs Coordinator

Richard Milburn Academy, Lubbock, Texas 1995 – 1996 Director of Exceptional Programs

YWCA of Lubbock, Lubbock, Texas

Teaching Experience: 2000 - 2002 Technology Teacher (9-12); Richard Milburn Academy Lubbock, Texas 1999 – 2000 Resource Teacher (9-12); Littlefield High School, Littlefield, Texas 1998 – 1999 Behavior Management Teacher (9th); Killeen Ninth Grade, Killeen, Texas 1997 – 1998 Behavior Management Teacher (9-12); Slaton High School, Slaton, Texas January 1997- June 1997 Homebound Education Teacher; Lubbock ISD, Lubbock, Texas 1993 – 1996 PPCD Teacher; Lubbock Independent School District, Lubbock, Texas 1993 – 1998 Summer School Teacher; Lubbock ISD (PPCD) and Slaton ISD, Slaton, Texas

PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS

NSDC National Staff Development Council ASCD Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development WASA Wyoming Association of School Administrators National Alternative Education Association Texas Association for Alternative Education L.E.A.D. – Leading Educators of Alternative Disciplines Texas Charter Schools Association Washington Association for Learning Alternatives Texas Association of Secondary Principals American Association of School Administrators West Texas Council of Administrators in Special Education


Page e69

U282M110023 0023

EDUCATION:

ROBERT H. CROSBY President/CEO NESI/RMHS

• Masters in Administration, George Washington University • B.S., Engineering, Massachusetts Maritime Academy

A. NonPublic Educational Services, Inc. (NESI) – 4/79 to present

President/CEO of a multifaceted educational corporation serving at-risk students in grades kindergarten through 12 in alternative high schools and charter schools; and numerous contracts for training and education at a vast array of military institutions in the United States and South Korea. Responsible for the oversight of all operations including strategic planning, daily operations, administration of corporate policies and procedures, financial planning, operations, and reporting and evaluation of all programs.

NESI and its wholly owned subsidiary, Richard Milburn High School, Inc. (RMHS), operates three contracted alternative high schools in three states; 15 charter schools in two states, and Title I remedial reading and math programs in seven states and the District of Columbia, with more than 1,000 employees.

TECHNICAL EDUCATION/EXPERIENCE:

• Contract Administrator, Title I Bypass, Virginia, 1979 to present. Title I ByPass,

Missouri, 2003 - present. Responsibilities include: • Contract administrator for Title I services for nonpublic school children in 14 public

school districts across Virginia in 35 private schools with approximately 700 Title I students and a professional staff of 30 certified teachers. Also in 59 public school districts in Missouri, 105 private schools with 2,500 students and a professional staff of 50 certified teachers.

• Wrote and edited seven Title I proposals for submission to the U.S. Department of Education securing contracts in national competitive bidding.

• Developed and monitored an annual program budget of more than $1.4 million. • Interpreted, applied corporate personnel policies and insured confidentiality and

maintenance of personnel files on all Title I staff • Established effective communication with the U.S. Department of Education,

Virginia Department of Education, Missouri Department of Education, and private school officials to insure effective coordination and cooperation.

• Compiled and analyzed data for annual project evaluation reports. • Coordinated negotiations with the U.S. Department of Education officials for Title I

Bypass contracts.


Page e70

U282M110023 0023

R. Crosby Page 2

• Transition Team Manager, for project start-ups, Richard Milburn High School,

NonPublic Educational Services, Inc., April 1979 to present. Managed school start-ups to include recruitment, interviewing, hiring, and training of qualified staff. Developed standard operating procedures, quality control plan, physical security plan, and government inventory property control. Established payroll records and procedures. Coordinated with contract offices and school district administrators. Reviewed operations to insure cognizance with all contract requirements. Conducted follow-up site visits to monitor performance. Managed the transition team at the following projects.

Alternative High Schools: Sarasota, Florida Chicago, Illinois Fort Wayne, Indiana Haverhill/Amesbury, Massachusetts Plymouth, Massachusetts Winchendon, Massachusetts

Wake County, North Carolina Chesterfield County, Virginia Norfolk, Virginia Virginia Beach, Virginia Warren County, Virginia

B. Vice President, RMC Research Corporation, 1965 – 1979

• Project Director, 1971 - 1979, in the design of a process evaluation for ten education

personnel training programs in the U.S. Office of Education. Instruments were developed for the process evaluation, field tested in 80 projects, and implemented in more than 500 projects.

• Project Director, 1968-1971, for the evaluation of the National Teachers Corps program in the U.S. Office of Education. Designed a detailed interview guide for use as a data- collection instrument for ten project site visits. Interviewed 200 paraprofessionals in the field directly involved with the Teacher Corps project as well as individuals in colleges, the elementary system, and the community.

• Key Analyst, 1968-1970, in the planning and development of a sample design, methodology, and resulting instruments used for an evaluation of the Emergency School Assistance Program of the U.S. Office of Education.

• Project Director, 1967 – 1973, of the preparation and implementation of analysis plans of the data collected from the Consolidated Program Information Report (CPIR) during 1971, 1972, and 1973 for the National Center of Educational Statistics of the U.S. Office of Education. This statistical analysis focused on measures of program input including staffing, participants, and expenditures for various educational programs.

• Program Director, 1965 – 1967, to validate data collected on the Consolidated Program Information Report (CPIR). Designed validation methodology, analysis plan, and field interviewing techniques for the U.S. Department of Education.


Page e71

U282M110023 0023

DONNA T. ELDRIDGE Vice President, High School Division

Richard Milburn High School

EDUCATION: • Postgraduate Work, College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, Old Dominion University ,

Norfolk, Virginia • Masters in Education, Guidance and Counseling, Providence College, Providence, Rhode Island • B.A., English, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, North Carolina

EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCE: • Vice President, High School Division, Richard Milburn High School. Responsible for the total

operational and educational components of all schools in the High School Division, the development and start-up of new schools and programs, and the provision of administrative services to charter schools.

• Regional Director for RMHS projects throughout South Virginia and North Carolina. Responsible for the total operational and educational components of multiple projects, as well as the operational start up of new RMHS programs as required by rapid growth.

• South Virginia Area Director for RMHS projects. Responsible for the total operation of projects including implementation of the educational program, securing and maintaining adequate facilities, developing and administering budgets, and staffing projects with qualified personnel. Member of the RMHS – High School Division Steering Committee which: 1) reviews RMHS-HSD policies and procedures and recommends revisions and 2) evaluates and recommends whether RMHS priorities are being met or need revision to meet the needs of clients and ensure quality programs.

• Regional Supervisor for RMHS projects in the Hampton Roads Virginia area. Total responsibility for all operational and programmatic aspects of the start up of new projects and the maintenance of existing projects.

• Program Director for RMHS projects in the Hampton Roads area. Responsible for the marketing and growth of RMHS programs throughout the area with 8 public school divisions.

• Program Coordinator for RMHS in Virginia Beach. Opened operations for private high school classes in Virginia Beach which grew to encompass nontraditional programs with 3 public school divisions.

• Program Manager and teacher of Adult Basic Education and GED in correctional setting. Developed and implemented program. Responsible for testing and educational counseling of male and female students.

• Teacher for RMHS at Quantico, Virginia. Taught high school English classes to U.S. Marines and dependents. Responsibilities included design of curriculum.

• Teacher for public schools in Chesapeake, Virginia (3 years) and Anne Arundel, Maryland. (2 years). Taught English for grades 7 through 12 for students of all ability levels. Involved in curriculum development. Counseled students in educational choices and planning.

• Volunteer work includes intense involvement with children and young people as well as efforts to provide support to others in a variety of environments.

MEMBERSHIPS: • National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP) • Association Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD)



Page e72

U282M110023 0023

DAVID R. MORRISSETTE Chief Financial Officer

EDUCATION: B.S., Accountancy, Bentley College, Waltham, Massachusetts 1981 Summa Cum Laude

EXPERIENCE: • Chief Financial Officer, Nonpublic Educational Services, Inc., Salem,

Massachusetts, 2002 - Present

• Business Development Finance Manager/Division Controller, Financial Analysis, Acterna Corporation (formerly Dynatech Corporation), Burlington, Massachusetts, 1993 – 2002 International technology provider with over 60 entities. Primary responsibilities included financial analysis; interim controller services; and designing and implementing tools and providing advice in the strategic planning process. Key member of a team that completed 15 acquisitions and 40 divestitures in six years. Acquisition Related Activities: Analyzed and reviewed over 75 potential acquisitions in a variety of markets, technologies, industries, and geographic locations resulting in the acquisition of 15 companies. Performed accounting and legal due diligence managing internal and external resources on selected acquisition candidates, with particular attention on financial systems; recommended controls and procedures for successful integration. Determined valuation of acquisition candidates ranging from $2M-$165M. Analyzed historical and forecasted financial statements to assess viability of candidates. Reviewed markets and products of candidates to determine strategic fit with core businesses. Reviewed offering memorandums and presentation material to estimate valuation ranges and determine extent of due diligence review. Negotiated letters of intent and terms and conditions of sales to minimize exposure. Negotiated terms of purchase and sale agreements based on results of due diligence findings. Designed and implemented detailed acquisition model, incorporating numerous variables, on Microsoft Excel to value businesses for potential acquisition. Divestiture Related Activities: Participated in over 40 divestitures meeting the board of director’s goals of cash generation and company restructuring. Assumed controller responsibilities of companies held for sale. Reviewed financial systems and implemented appropriate controls and procedures to prepare businesses for sale. Reviewed contracts and analyzed financial statements to determine extent of actual and contingent liabilities to minimize exposure and valuation erosion. Analyzed business forecasts and determined viability for presentation to potential buyers to maximize value. Co-wrote and edited offering memorandums. Managed investment bankers, attorneys, and outside accountants resulting in lower costs and fees. Presented financial information and represented Dynatech to potential buyers. Negotiated letters of intent and terms and conditions of sales to maximize value and minimize exposure. Negotiated final purchase price adjustments and breaches of representation and warranty claims subsequent to closings. Strategic Planning Activities: Collaborated with Vice President Corporate Development in designing and implementing strategic planning process data collection system. Participated in the process of determining viability of subsidiary companies’ strategic plans. Made recommendations for growing or exiting the businesses. Designed and implemented on Lotus


Page e73

U282M110023 0023

D. Morrissette Page 2

a detailed product development information collection system for tracking and measuring return on investment.

• Controller, New England Technology Group, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, a subsidiary

of Dynatech Corporation, 1990 – 1993 Directed all accounting and administrative functions. Implemented and maintained financial systems, controls, and procedures resulting in improved cash management, reduced costs and expenses, and increased reliability of financial statements. Coordinated annual audits and prepared supporting tax schedules. Reported to Dynatech Corporation Group Controller as Special Projects Controller: documented employee embezzlement case; performed internal audits on poorly performing entities; performed acquisition diligence; acted as interim controller for newly acquired companies; and reviewed financial books and records of companies held for sale. Transferred to Dynatech after divestiture.

• Controller, Winchester Healthcare Enterprise, Inc., Winchester, Massachusetts, 1988 –

1990: Directed all accounting functions in a multiple entity environment. Implemented and maintained PC based (Solomon) accounting system. Implemented and maintained financial systems, controls and procedures. Coordinated annual audit and prepared supporting tax schedules

• General Accounting Manager, Budget Rent-A-Car of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts,

1987 - 1988

• Assistant Corporate Controller, The Robert A. McNeil Corporation, San Mateo, California, 1981-1987


Page e74

U282M110023 0023

e107 PR/Award # U29862CM10008175

EDLA HODGESON Director of Human Resources

EDUCATION: Human Resources Management Program, Bentley College, Massachusetts Bachelor of Arts, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut

EXPERIENCE: NonPublic Educational Services, Inc. 199_ to Present • Director, Human Resources, Responsible for providing resource leadership and support to

800 employees in the areas of organizational effectiveness, talent management, performance evaluation and review, employee relations, diversity/inclusion, staffing, compensation, benefits, policy development and interpretation, legal and government compliance, and training and development. Serves as the strategic business partner to the executive leadership team in developing and implementing programs and initiatives that support and enable the company’s goals, strategies, and mission. Manages a HR staff of specialists.

Oxford & Associates, Inc • Manager, Human Resources. Responsible for managing a staff of three and leading

recruitment, employee relations, compensation, HRIS, and administration. Managed employee relations for 32 national office sites, working with managers and employees to ensure a productive work environment and compliance with corporate policy, and state and federal employment laws. Responded to six discrimination claims (EEOC). Each dismissed. Coordinated company efforts and records review for DOL and OFCCP audits. Managed recruitment function for a 150 employee telemarketing center and six corporate departments, recruiting 87 new hires. Conducted management training sessions on interviewing skills and sexual harassment prevention. Produced and managed affirmation action program. Oversaw administration compliance for all employee records, including state audits. Supervised immigration matters including H-1B visa applications.

• Manager, Employee Relations. Developed, implemented, and monitored employee

relations programs to achieve business and management objectives and foster positive employee relations.

The Colonial Group • HR Specialist. Recruited for over 100 exempt and hourly positions. Managed quarterly and

annual recruiting costs, achieving a 36% company savings in cost per hire. • Benefits Administrator. Supervised two staff members. Managed seven benefit plans for

more than 500 employees at two national sites. Negotiated renewal contracts for insurance plans within budget and deadline.

• Recruiter. Supervised recruiting assistant. Recruited for hourly and exempt positions and managed company temporary staffing needs.

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: • The Society for Human Resources Professionals • United Way Loaned Executive Alumni


Page e75

U282M110023 0023

C. GREGORY SHIELDS Program Director

EDUCATION: Bachelor of Management, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, 1974 Bachelor of Business Education (Comprehensive 7-12 Teaching Certificate), Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, 1978 Master of Guidance Counseling and Rehabilitation, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, 1982 Advanced Graduate Studies in Education Administration, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 1983

EXPERIENCE: • Director, Worldwide Internet Secondary Education Program, Richard Milburn High School,

2001 – Present. Oversee admissions, counseling, and technology support services for more than 350 students. Responsible for accreditation, compliance, and all online regulatory requirements.

• President and Owner, Education Tomorrow, 1998-2001. Managed and coordinated all business activities of a small education and training consulting business specializing in e-learning education/training and support applications. Recruited, supervised, and trained contracted personnel in web-based course design and development, course conversions, and assessment for placement in government and commercial contracts.

• Program Manager, Marine Corps Satellite Education Network, United States Marine Corps, 1997-1998. Created, designed, and managed the Marine Corps Satellite Education Network offering video-conferencing training and education programs to 170,000 Marines worldwide. Served as Lifelong Learning’s distance learning expert and coordinator.

• Director, Voluntary Education Programs, United States Marine Corps, 1993-1998. Served in highest-ranking USMC civilian education position. Oversaw USMC Off-Duty Voluntary Education programs. Managed a $15 million tuition program and developed education policy for 170,000 Marines. Responsible for quality control, program implementation, and inspections of all USMC installation education centers. 1997 National Military Educator of the Year. 1995 and 1993 Official Commendations for Exceptional Performance.

• Command Education Officer, Marine Corps Combat Development Command, United States Marine Corps, 1989-1993. Directed and supervised off-duty college/university program encompassing 2,000 student enrollment. Managed tuition assistance and financial aid budget of approximately $400,000. Monitored and evaluated all counseling and admissions services. Negotiated college/USMC Education Services Agreements. Served as Test Control Officer.

• Senior Education Services Officer, Army Education Center, United States Army, 1988-1989. Supervised and managed overall operations of two Army Education Centers. Assumed collateral duty of Equal Employment Opportunity Officer. Directly supervised 10 GS personnel in the administration and coordination of all Army Education Center Programs and Services. Fund Control Officer for $350,000 budget.

• Supervisory Education Services Specialist, United States Army, Flak Army Education Center, West Germany, 1986-1988. Managed overall operations for two Army Education Centers supporting a student population of 1,000. Responsible for directing, planning, and implementing all education programs offered by the Army Education Center. Directly supervised 6 GS personnel and 4 contracted personnel. Fund Control Officer for $800,000 education center budget.

• Guidance Counselor, United States Army, H.C. Cobb Army Education Center, West Germany, 1984-1986. Provided career guidance and counseling to military and family population of 2,500. Responsible for identifying and assessing needs of military personnel and family members to provide full range of general and career developing counseling.



Page e76

U282M110023 0023

JOHN BROWN IT Administrator

EDUCATION

NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, Boston, Massachusetts. September 2002 Earned: "Bachelor of Science in Electrical and Computer Engineering". Honors: Q.P.A. 3.38/4.0, Deans List most Quarters. Courses: Microprocessor Based Design, Computer Architecture, Data Structures and Algorithms,

Communications Systems, Electronics (Analog, Digital and Power), Topics in IC Design, Engineering Design and Graphics, EE Material Science, Electromagnetic Fields and Waves.

Activities: Member of Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society.

NORTH SHORE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Lynn, Massachusetts. December 1996 Earned: "Associates in Science in Engineering Transfer". Honors: Q.P.A. 3.82/4.0, Deans List all Semesters, Distinguished Service Award-Phi Theta Kappa. Courses: Circuit Theory, Digital Logic Design, Technical Drawing, Calculus, Physics, Chemistry. Activities: ember of Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society. Member of Engineering Club.

PEABODY VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL, Peabody, Massachusetts. June 1986 Earned: High School Diploma.

COMPUTER SKILLS Operating Systems: Windows XP, 2KPro, 2003 Server, NT, NT Server, 98, 95, MS DOS, Solaris. Programming Languages: Borland C 5.2, HTML, Assembly, Binary, Fortran 77, VHDL, LabView 5.1. Applications: MS Office, Star Office, AutoCAD 2000, View Draw 7.7, Power PCB 3.6,

PSpice 7.1, OrCad Capture and Layout 9.2.

EXPERIENCE IT CONSULTANT, Accent Communications, Danvers, MA. Dec 02 - June 05 Responsible for the setup, maintenance, upgrading and repair of desktop and server hardware. Configure new users for network access. Install and configure server and client based applications. Troubleshoot and resolve application errors. Maintain printing systems. Install networking cables as needed.

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING COOP, Instrumentation Laboratory, Lexington, MA. Apr 0l-Mar 02 Responsible for the ACL-Top CPU, CPU Interface and Y-axis boards. Correct circuit design problems, verify solutions through testing, update documentation and schematics, perform design reviews. Work with outside vendors for board layout modification and manufacturing. Install and support EE design software on NT server and clients. Assemble, install and support Y -Axis shuttles in prototype machines.

ANALOG ENGINEERING INTERN, Sun Microsystems, Burlington, MA. Jan-Mar, June-Dec 2000 Assist with design and prototyping of DC/DC converters, and the design and construction of test equipment. Other tasks include testing power supplies from outside vendors, maintaining the lab and ordering supplies.


Page e77

U282M110023 0023

E. Allen Schenck

Areas of expertise Educational Research, Evaluation, and Assessment

Technical Assistance and Training

Accountability in Title I, NCLB

Data Utilization for School Improvement

Education Ph.D., Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1968 M.A., Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1966 B.A., Psychology and Mathematics, The College of Wooster, 1964

Professional history

2003-Present Senior Research Associate, RMC Research Corporation, Arlington, VA 1979-2003 Senior Research Associate, RMC Research Corporation, Portsmouth, NH 1984-2002 Adjunct Faculty, School of Management, Lesley College 1978-1979 Research Associate, RMC Research Corporation 1977-1978 Measurement Specialist, Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory 1970-1977 Research Psychologist, Battelle-Columbus Laboratories 1968-1970 Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of

Illinois

Professional experience

Project Direction/Management/Administration

Currently directing a statewide evaluation of the Ohio 21st Century Community Learning Centers.

During 2006-2007, directed an evaluation of a Mathematics and Science Partnership grant involving a consortium of eight school districts.

During 2005-2008, was project director of the development and implementation of alternative accountability self assessment procedures for selected schools in New York.

During 1998-2000, directed an evaluation of a USED-funded project to promote improved data utilization by Safe and Drug Free Schools program directors in New York City school districts.

During 1993-96 directed the Region A Title 1 Technical Assistance Center, a contract funded by USED to assist state and local Title 1 programs in the evaluation and


Page e78

U282M110023 0023

improvement of federally funded compensatory education programs designed to assist educationally disadvantaged students attain higher levels of achievement in school.

During 1991-93 directed a national survey of approximately 2,000 Title 1 schoolwide projects in about 400 school districts for USED. Responsible for the development of data collection instruments, data collection procedures, data analysis, and report writing.

During 1987-88 directed a project, under subcontract to Westat, Inc., supporting the development of questionnaire content for an OERI-sponsored survey of teachers and principals in Chapter 1 schools. The results of this survey were incorporated into the 1987 national assessment of Chapter 1 that informed the development of the 1988 Hawkins-Stafford amendments.

Research, Evaluation, and Assessment

Currently the principal investigator of a five-year evaluation of a Striving Readers project in Virginia. Nine middle schools from three school districts will implement a targeted reading intervention for randomly assigned struggling readers. Responsible for designing and monitoring the random assignment process, collecting student achievement data from state and local assessments, developing analytical models for estimating program impact, conducting data analyses, and reporting results.

Also currently participating in a five-year evaluation of a Striving Readers project in Memphis, TN. Responsible for developing the experimental design for assessing the effects of a schoolwide literacy academy for core content teachers and a targeted reading intervention in eight middle schools on student achievement in reading, mathematics, science, and social studies. Also responsible for designing and implementing multi-level data analyses of the impacts of these two treatments and their interactions and preparing reports of the results of the impact evaluations.


Page e79

U282M110023 0023

Jill D. Lammert

Areas of expertise

Ph.D. candidate in Education (expected graduation August 2010). Knowledge of advanced qualitative and quantitative research methods,

including single-subject research design, mixed-methods research design, program evaluation, and structural equation modeling.

Excellent leadership, interpersonal, and communication skills. Strong management, organization and problem-solving abilities. Fluent in Spanish and highly proficient in Portuguese.

Education

Ph.D. candidate, Education Research Methods, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, January 2004 to present (expected graduation August 2010) M.A., Education and Human Development, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., May 1999 B.A. Psychology, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., May 1996

Professional history

2009 – Present RMC Research Corporation – Research Associate

2008 – 2009 Research for Better Schools (RBS) – Consultant

2004 – Present George Mason University – Graduate Research Assistant, Educational

Research Methods

2005 – 2006 PADECO, CO., Ltd. – Consultant

June – October Appalachian Educational Laboratory (AEL) – Consultant 2004

2000 – 2006 World Bank – Consultant

1999 – 2000 Inter-American Development Bank – Consultant


Page e80

U282M110023 0023

DEANNA KELLEY-WINSTEAD, PHD

10340 Luria Commons Court, Apt F Burke, VA 22015

phone: 703.725.8218 [email protected]

OBJECTIVE To join a corporation that will utilize my educational background, research skills, and technical skills in the conduction of social science evaluation research that will enhance national initiatives.

SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Professional with 8 years of experience in social science research in the areas of workforce development, substance abuse, child abuse and neglect, and school violence. Excellent analysis skills using both qualitative and quantitative methods.

EDUCATION

DEGREES 2010 Ph.D. Research Methodology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA Minor: Educational Psychology Dissertation Title: New Directions in Educational Research: Using Data Mining Techniques to Explore Predictors of Grade Retention 2005 M.Ed. Educational Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA Concentration: Assessment, Curriculum, and Evaluation 2003 B.A. Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

2009-Present Research Associate, UNCF Special Programs Corporation Falls Church, VA

Serve as primary author for proposals requiring a technical methodological approach. Analyze requests for proposals/appropriations and assist in formulating strategic technical responses. Apply mixed methods (program evaluation, qualitative and quantitative) to the design and implement evaluation, applied research and/or assessment projects, including the analysis, writing and dissemination of findings. Provide technical expertise for evaluation/assessment/research related programmatic activities of the sponsored program in accordance with the program plan approved by the funding agency or organization. Plan, organize and implement internal and external evaluation, assessment and/or research activities. Review potential research projects and initiatives, and develop proposals. Generate grant activity reports for internal and external use. Provide leadership and direction to project team members in the planning, organizing and coordination of the activities of program participant, including data collection. Conduct presentations, group sessions and individual interviews.

2009 Consultant, RMC Research Corporation Arlington, VA

Provide support to external evaluations in the field of education, including school improvement and accountability, arts in education, and special education. Develop instruments including surveys and rubrics for observations. Conduct focus groups, interviews, site visits, data analysis, and proposal writing.


Page e81

U282M110023 0023

2007-2008 Research Associate, Circle Solutions, Inc. McLean, VA

Conducted and implemented research projects, including program evaluation and descriptive studies related to school based prevention and policing programs, as well as other prevention based programs. Collaborated with law enforcement, community organizations, and other government organizations in conducting research and providing technical assistance. Conducted interviews and focus groups. Prepared research reports, documents, and briefs. Developed data collection instruments and conducting multivariable statistical analysis. Conducted literature reviews on various topics in support of proposals and client deliverables (e.g., Office of Community Oriented Policing Service [COPS Office]; National Institutes of Health: National Institute of Mental Health [NIMH], National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [NIAMS], National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseased [NIDDK], Health Resources and Services Administration [HRSA], and Emergency Medical Services for Children [EMSC]).

2006-2008 Graduate Research Assistant, George Mason University (GMU) Fairfax, VA

Conducted research using data mining techniques on criminal justice treatment practices funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).

2005-2007 Research Associate, Community Science Gaithersburg, MD

Formerly, Association for the Study and Development of Community Performed program evaluations for national programs focused on the following areas of study: education, school violence prevention, substance use prevention, child abuse and neglect prevention, cultural diversity, and community capacity building. Provided technical support to national initiatives that focus on comprehensive community development and community capacity building. Conducted project coordination, case studies, and site visits. Prepared case studies, meeting materials, assist with proposal development, as well as, edited reports and questionnaires. Maintained company website.

2004-2005 Skills Instructor, UCM-Community Solutions; Workforce Development Center

Alexandria, VA Designed, implemented and instructed the curriculum for the following workforce essential skills classes: an on-the-job retail apprenticeship program, resume writing workshop, interviewing skills, clerical procedures, Microsoft in a Minute; computer literacy courses, and budgeting.

2004 Research Assistant, George Mason University (GMU) Fairfax, VA

Conducted survey research at INOVA Fairfax Hospital with persons diagnosed with type II diabetes. Survey data was collected to assess an individuals self-regulation, self-efficacy and self- management. Qualitative and quantitative data analysis were also conducted.


Page e82

U282M110023 0023

e0 PR/Award # U282M100015

Dr. Greg O. Muller

Resume

Education Ph.D., Sociology, Texas A&M University, 2002 M.S., Sociology, Brigham Young University, 1992

B.S., Sociology, Brigham Young University, 1989

Areas of Specialization Sociology of Deviance, Social Psychology, Family, Grant-Writing and Administration, Program Evaluation

Research, Evaluation & Administration Experience 2003-2005 Snow Community Grant Support Office, Director. Established and

oversaw a center that offers a wide range of grant-writing support, training and program evaluation services to rural communities, designed to improve the quality of life and promote safe and healthy living. (reasons for leaving: to work from home; to finish my book)

1998-2003 School-to-Work Opportunities Project, Snow College, Director.

Administration of 1.7m program designed to prepare students for academic and employment success. Responsibilities included instruction, training, staff development, budgeting, reporting, grant seeking, program development and evaluation. (reasons for leaving: to establish a grant support office at Snow College)

1991-1998 Public Policy Research Institute, Texas A&M University, Research Assistant. Involved in policy relevant research projects in the public health, technology transfer, and drug-prevention arenas; involved all phases of research, including program evaluation, grant-writing and reviewing, research design, survey instrumentation, data collection, data management, SAS/SPSS/STATA programming, data analysis,


Page e83

U282M110023 0023


report preparation and presentation; and periodic university course instruction. (reasons for leaving: to care for the health of a family member in Utah)

1989-1991 Women’s Research Institute, Brigham Young University, Research Assistant (Dr. Marie Cornwall, thesis chair). Research and administrative duties related to the Adolescent Development Study, a three-year, national study, including survey design, data collection, data analysis, database management, report writing and literature review research (reasons for leaving: graduate school in Texas).

Selected Publications

Muller, G.O. (2007). HIGH GLORY: Maximize What You Believe, Knowbility Press.

Muller, G.O. (2002-2006) APR – GEARUP Program, Annual Reports submitted

yearly to U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. Muller, G.O. (2003) APR - 21st Century Learning Centers: Summary Report. Final

Report submitted to U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. Nader, R., Muller, G.O., Johnson, C. D., & Blakely, C.H. (1999). Developing

Effective University-Community Collaboration Through Grantwriting: The Community Grant Support Initiative. In R. Lerner & T. R. Chibucos (Eds.), Serving Children And Families Through Community-University Partnerships: Success Stories. New York: Sage Publications.

Kotch, J.B., Muller, G.O., & Blakely, C.H. (1999). Understanding the Origins and

Incidence of Child Abuse and Neglect. Lead Chapter (ch.1) in T.P. Gullotta & S. McElhaney (Eds.), Preventing Family and Community Violence: Voices vs Violence. New York: Sage Publications.

Menon, R., Muller, G.O., Jordan, J.A., Bell, M. & Halperin, L. (1997). Juvenile

Justice in Texas: Factors Correlated with Processing Decisions (Final Report). Criminal Justice Division of the Texas Governor's Office, Austin, TX.

Muller, G.O. & Blakely, C.H. (1996). The Graphic Program: A Tool For

NSF/IUCRC Evaluators In The Collection And Presentation Of L.I.F.E., Extended L.I.F.E., And Meeting Effectiveness Data. Computer software application and accompanying evaluation instruction pamphlet presented to the National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.


Page e84

U282M110023 0023


Muller, G.O. & Blakely, C.H. (1998) (1997) (1996). Process/Outcome Survey Of Industry, Faculty, And Students At The NSF Industry/Cooperative Research Center In Ergonomics at Texas A&M University. Annual center report to the National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.

Blakely, C.H., Menon, R., Jones, D.C., Bell, J.M., Jordan, J. Muller, G.O., Haynes,

F.L., and Baez, L.A. (1995). Project BELONG (Building Essential Life Options Through New Goals) 1992-1995. Final report for the Drug-Free Schools and Community Prevention Programs, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.

Muller, G.O. and Wolf, A. (1994). Conflict Resolution And Other Mentoring Issues.

In Project BELONG Mentoring At-Risk Youth: Training Manual. U.S. Department Of Education, Washington, D.C.

Menon, R., Johnson, C.D., Messer, I., Blakely, C.H., and Muller, G.O. (1992) Tactics

And Technologies Survey: A Summary Report. Final Report Submitted To The Institute For National Drug Abatement Research, Texas A&M University, College Station.

Carmichael, D.J., Blakely, C.H., and Muller, G.O. (1992). Fiscal Policy Alternatives

For Special Program Finance: A Review Of The Literature And Survey Of The States. Final Report Submitted To The Legislative Education Board/Educational Economic Policy Center In Austin, TX.

Hammond, R.J., and Muller, G.O. (1992). The Late-Life Divorced: Another Look.

Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 17, 135-150.

Selected Presentations Muller, G. O., John, C.R. (October, 2001). Applied Sociology: A Framework For

Turning College Student Assignments Into Resume, Network And Community Building Opportunities. Presented at the Society for Applied Sociology Meetings, St. Louis, MO.

Muller, G.O., Olmstead, B., Scott, C., and McGulivary, B. (April., 1999). Strategic

Volunteerism: A Unique Strategy for Developing a Resume of Experience. Presented at the Utah Conference on Volunteerism, Salt Lake City, UT.

Menon R. & Muller, G.O. (August, 1998). Understanding Minority

Overrepresentation In The Juvenile Justice Population: Perceptions Of Juvenile Justice Practitioners. Presented At The Annual Meeting Of The American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA.

Muller, G.O. (April, 1998). Center Evaluation and Process-Outcome Survey Results

for the I/UCR Center in Ergonomics. Presented at the National Science Foundation’s I/UCRC Bi-Annual Industry Advisory Board Meetings, San Antonio, TX.


Page e85

U282M110023 0023


Muller, G.O., Muller, P.A., Blakely, C.H. & Menon, R. (August, 1997). The effects

of mentoring on family environment, adolescent substance use, delinquency, and academic achievement. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Toronto, Canada.

Hunter, P. & Muller, G.O. (August, 1996).A Preliminary Analysis Of Qualitative

Research Focusing On Sexual Abstinence. Presented At The Annual Meeting Of The Sociological Association, New York.

Muller, G.O., Menon, R., Jordan, J.A., Blakely, C.B., & Muller, P.A. (August, 1996).

The Impact Of Mentoring On The Relationship Between Parental Rejection And Parental Monitoring, And Antisocial Behavior. Presented At The Annual Meeting Of The American Sociological Association, New York.

Blakely, C.H., Johnson, C.D., Jones, D.J., Muller, G.O., & Menon, R. (June, 1996).

Mentoring At-Risk Youth: A School-Focused Intervention. Presented At The Annual Meeting Of The Society For Prevention Research. San Juan, PR.

Muller, G.O. (March, 1995). Mentoring And The Relationship Between Family

Environment And Problem Behaviors Among At-Risk Youth. Presented At The Annual Meeting Of The Southwestern Social Science Association, Houston, TX.

Muller, G.O. & Menon, R. (August, 1995). Family Influences On Peer Associations

And Delinquency: A Tale Of Two Constructs. Presented At The Annual Meeting Of The American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.

Muller, G.O. (March, 1995) Only The Lonely? Non-Affiliation In Voluntary

Associations. Presented At The Annual Meeting Of The Southwestern Social Science Association, Dallas, TX.

Knight, L., Haynes, F.L., Muller, G.O., Glenn, C. Menon, R., & Blakely, C.H.

(March, 1995). Mentoring At-Risk Adolescents: Project BELONG (Building Essential Life Options Through New Goals). Presented At The Annual Meeting Of The National Association Of The National Association Of School Psychologists, Chicago, IL.

Muller, G.O., Blakely, C.H., Haynes, F.L., Menon, R, & Wolf, A. (October, 1994).

Family Interaction, Self-Esteem, And Aggressive Attitudes Among At-Risk Adolescents. Presented At The Annual Meeting Of The Mid-South Sociological Association, Lafayette, LA.

Selected Grants

2005 Distance Education Grant, funded by U.S. Department of Education ($200,000)


Page e86

U282M110023 0023


2004 Community Mosquito Abatement, funded by Utah Department of Agriculture ($25,000)

2004 Adult Education and Family Literacy Grant, funded by Utah State Office of Education, ($50,000)

2004 Transportation Enhancement Grant, funded by Utah Department of Transportation ($250,000)

2004 Enhancement of Education Technology Training (EETT) Grant, funded by

Utah State Office of Education ($254,000)

2003 Adult Education and Family Literacy Grant, funded by Utah State Office of

Education, ($30,000)

2002 Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs Grant, funded by the U.S. Department of Education ($2,500,000)

2000 21st Century Community Learning Center Grant, funded by the U.S.

Department of Education ($1,503,000) 1998 Automated Process/Outcome: A Data Processing Tool for Evaluators, a

grant funded by the National Science Foundation ($7,500). 1995 Disproportionate Minority Confinement, a grant funded by the State of

Texas Governor’s Office ($100,000).

Selected Consulting and Evaluation Ongoing Program Evaluation, Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for

Undergraduate Programs, Sanpete Community

Ongoing Consulting, Technical Assistance Provider Pool, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Washington, D.C.

2001-2003 Consulting, Chair, Utah Department of Workforce Services Western Region Youth Council, Utah Western Region


Page e87

U282M110023 0023


2001-2004 Program Evaluation, 21st Century Community Learning Centers, Sanpete Community

1999-2002 Program Evaluation, Extended Year School Program Evaluation, North Sanpete School District and South Sanpete School District

2000 (Nov.) Consulting, U.S. Department of Education Safe and Drug-Free Recognition Program Advisory Panel. Phoenix, AZ

1999-2002 Program Evaluation, Extended Year School Program Evaluation, North Sanpete School District and South Sanpete School District

1995-1998 Program Evaluation, National Science Foundation Center for Ergonomics and National Science Foundation Center for Applied Materials and Devices, Texas A&M University

2000-2001 Consulting, Meridian GeoSystems, Inc., Production of demographic maps and reports for major U.S. Corporations

2000 (Aug.) Consulting, U.S. Department of Education, Review of GEARUP State Grant Proposals, Washington, D.C.

2000 (Nov.) Consulting, U.S. Department of Education Safe and Drug-Free Recognition Program Advisory Panel, Phoenix, AZ.

1997 (Aug.) Consulting, U.S. Department of Education SDFSC Program, Review of Effective Programs and Strategies to Prevent Youth Drug Use, Violent Behavior, or Both Grant Proposals, Washington, D.C.


Page e88

U282M110023 0023


1997 (June) Consulting, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services , Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA), CSAP, Review of Starting-Early-Starting Smart (Primary Health Care and Data Coordinating Centers) Grant Proposals, Washington, D.C.

1996 (July) Consulting, U.S. Department of Education, Panel Chair and Reviewer

for SDFSC Program Drug and Violence Prevention Demonstration Grants, Washington, D.C.

Professional Associations American Sociological Association

Society for Applied Sociology

Recent Professional Development Great Teachers Seminar, Salt Lake Community College (Dec., 2004)


Page e89

U282M110023 0023

A



Attachment 2 - Letters of Support

1. David Dunn, Executive Director – Texas Charter Schools Association

2. Charter Amendment Requests, RMA expansion into Round Rock ISD, Arlington ISD,

Pasadena ISD, Victoria ISD, and Spring ISD

3. Capacity Builders, Inc.- Memo of Understanding

These requests were approved by TEA on 7/25/08 and will be renewed by RMA.


Page e90

U282M110023 0023

512.584.8272 Phone 512.584.8492 Fax

700 Lavaca Street, Suite 930 Austin, Texas 78701

www.txcharterschools.org

May 11,2010

To Whom It May Concern:

We are pleased to acknowledge that Richard Milburn Academy is a member of the Texas Charter School Association and is actively involved in the Charter School movement in Texas. Their activities include, but are not limited to, searching for creative approaches to the teaching- learning processes where at-risk students are involved.

Executive Director


Page e91

U282M110023 0023


Page e92

U282M110023 0023

\ l I

1263 Terminal loop McQueeney, Texas 78155 Phone.(830) 557·6181 • Fax (830) 557·5424

ver \ I \


Ms. Monica Sena-Martinez Division of Cha1ter Schools Texas Educat ion Agency 1701 North Congress A venue Austin, TX 78701-1494

Dear Ms. Sena-Martinez:

Enclosed please find our request for the Commissioner's approval of the expansion of the Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. charter school in Beaumont into the Round Rock and Arlington ISDs.

I would be pleased to answer any questions you might have and look forward to the Agency's response to this request. Should campus start-up funding become available for existing charter school expansions, we would want this request to be considered.

S incerely,

Dr. Norman Hall Chief Educationa l Off i cer

pc: Mr. Robert Schu lman, Esquire Mr. J ames Cardle

Enclosure: Charter Amendment' Request, RMA Beaumont Business Plan Board Approval Charter Language Change Impact Statemen t Return Receipts


Page e93

U282M110023 0023

CHARTEH AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM • TexRS Education Agency • Charter Schools Division • Phone (512) 463-957 5 • fox (512) 463-9732

R j c h a rd M iJ burn A c a d emy . Beaumont ------'1 2':"!3o;;8!!10:::!4;-c;:;-:-:-;-:-:-;:-;:;:- ;:--:----- Namc of Charter School County-District Number

All amendment requests llltlSI be made in or attached to a written resolution adopted by the goveming body of the charter holder and signed by the members voting in favor. In addition, a!! amendment requests should include the text and page number, or a photocopy, of the current charter language to be changed, cmd the text proposed as the new charter language. Expansion amendments, numbers 1 A, must be submitted by Februat")' l of the year preceding the school yem· dming \Vhich the amendment would become effective.

1. Add Grade Levels (Exp8nsion Amendment)- Requested effective date: _

Currently approved grade levels:--------- Requested new gmdc levels:-,----,--,,--,----:-

Auach the wrillen board resolution as described at the top a./the page; Allach aeducation plan for each new grade level to be serl'ed; A!tach evidence that impact statements hape been sent to school districts and charier schools wilhin the geographic boundary o.fthe requesring school.

2. Add a Site (Expansion Amendment)- Requested effective date: J August 2008

New Address (if available): Arlington ISO ls the proposed campus within the cutTently approved geographic boundary? ®No 0 Yes If not, see request below to Change Geographic Boundary. If the amendment is approved, is a campus number requested? 0 No (X) Yes If the nmenchnenl is approved, should a cmnpus name different fmm the charter nmne be used? 0No {jl Yes If the mnendmenl is approved, should mail be sent Lo the campus? 0 No (X) YeR

1111ach the wrilten board resolution as described at the lop oft he page: A/tach evidence !hat impacl statements hal!e been sen/10 school rlislricls a11d charter schools H'ithin the geographic boundary qf the requesting school: Atlach a cert(flcate (ioccupan(y, or equivale/11 cert{{lcare, appropriate for the proposed use of the facility at the new site; !f the spec({lc location is 1101 idenl tfied at the timt of !he amendmenl request, tluil?fOrmat ion shall be submilted prior to commencing any opel'ations at lhat.\·ite.

3. Change Geographic Boundary (Expansion Amendment)- Requested effective date: 1 A'l9'tSt 2QQ8

School districts and charter schools in cmrently approved boundary: __,R, .e"""a"u"'m""o"n'-t"--"I'-'S"-D"------------- Proposed new school districts and charter schools: __,A'-r"-=l i"'n gl!tc.o,..nc.·J'""Sy,_Q, _

Attach the wrif!en hoard resolution, with the required language (see instructions), as described at the lop o,/fhe page; Alfach evidence that impact statements have been semto school rUstricls and charier schools within the geographic boundmy of the requesting school; A!fach another sheel of paper to describe the request, ({necesswy.

4. Increase Mllximum Enrollment (Expansion Amendtnenl)- Requested effective date: August 2 0 0 8

Currently approved maximum enro!Jmenl:_ 3""-"------ Requested new total maximum enrollment:_,_14 ._.Q,_,Q"-"O--..,..-=-

Attach a board resolution 1vith the required language (.see instructiom); The amendment will not be considered bv the commissioner without the Ct!JlJI'Q{JI'iare board resolulion. Note that/he resolution required (or this tvpe ofamendmem is di(ferent from that used for other tvpes of amendments; A1/ach evidencc: !hat impact swtements have been sen/ to school di Hrfct,,. and chcll'ter schools within the geographic boundary of the requesling , chou/.

D 5. Relocate Campus or Site·Requested effective dale:--------- County District Number: _ Current Address:--:::::--c;-;-:-;------------------------ Proposed Address (if available):-,----.,----:----:-:--,---:---=:---;;:--- Is the proposed relocation within the currently approved geographic boundary? O No 0 Yes If not, see request above to Change Geographic Boundary. If the amendment is approved, should mail be sent to the campus? 0 No 0 Yes

Atlach the written board resolution as desctibed a/ the lop of the page; Note that the proposed site must be within the currently approved geographic bou11dmy {fit iJ not, you must also submit an qmendment request to extend the geographic houndmy

6. Othc1· Amendment to Cluutcr- Requested effective date:--------- Description: Al!ach anoi Jel' sheet ofpapp· to describe the request. if necessary. ,,

};!/iM' / : - -.1:/.; Phone Number

_ 210-3Z5o9236 Fax Number

William P.. Gayton /-17-c-(j Printed Nflme of Clwrter School CLO Date


Page e94

U282M110023 0023

Richard Milburn Academy, Inc., Charter Holder Board Board Resolution

Beaumont Expansion- Arlington lSD 17 January, 2008

Having reviewed the TEA mandated Business Plan, the Board authorizes the Richard Milburn Academy, Beaumont, to submit a Charter Amendment Request to TEA (attached) requesting:

1. the addition of a site in the Arlington lSD, and 2. the increase of maximum enrollment to I ,000.

These requests will be effective I August, 2008.

Signature: r 7

OPPOSED Signature: -----------------

Prim: /t/t 1-t-/ th-1 d' tfdY .?'v _) Print:

Signulure:

Print: Signf!turc: -----------

Print:

Signature:

Print:

filt.,JV-42/ C{' lulJ:; I - rH) f£/111"-tS /1 . U)HIif

Signature: Print: Signature:------------

Print: Signnture: -----------

Print:


Page e95

U282M110023 0023

O

CHARTER AMENDMENT REQUEST FOHM fexas o:clucacion Agency • Clwncr Schoolo DiviSion • Phone (512) 463-9575 • Fax (512) 463-9732

R ic h a r d M i1b11 rn Ac ad em v , ' 8ea umo n t 1._,2':'3'-"8"'0"'4-,;c:- -:-;:;---:-;- ---- Name of Chnc·ter School Coulll)•-District Num cr

All ftmendment requests must be made in or allacbccl ton written resolution adopted by the goveming body of the charter holder and signed by the members voting in t3vor. In addition, ?.II <'lmendment requests should include the text and page number, or a photocopy, of the current chaner language to be changed, and the text proposed As the new charter \cmguagc. Expansion flmendments, number::; l-4, mu be submitted by Fcbru(lry \of the year preceding the school year during which the Rl1lCIHitnent would become e!Tcctive.

D 1. Add Grade Levels (Expansion A1nendment)- Re ucsced eficclive dale _ Currently approved grade levels:--------- •" Requested new grade levels:---------

A f/ach the wriflen board J·esolution as described at !he top of the page; A!tach a A educotion plan for each new grade level to be served, A f/ach evidence that impncr sra!emen!s huve been sent to school di.1·tricts and charter schools within the geographic boundat qf the 1·equesting school.

2. Add r1 Site (Expansion Amendment)'Rrquested effective date: 1 August 2008

New Address ( i!'available):-Ro.!illrlu_-'Rs.coJJ.cc'k'-'Ic.,;SuD<---,:-- -c-;-- ls the proposed campus within the c:w1·cntly approved geographic boundary? (!)No Yes lfnot, .see request below to Cbcmge Geographic Boundary. lfthe amendment is approved; is <1 cmnpus number requested? 0 No ®Yes lfthe amendn1cnt is appmved) should a campus nmne different from the churler nnme be used'? 0No 0 Yes \!'the mnendment is npproved, should nu-1il be sent to the campus? 0 No ®Yes

A /lach the wrilfen board resolution WJ described at the top o,f the page; A ffrch evidence thai impc1ct stalements have been sent to school districts and charter schools within the geogrnphic boundmy qflhe requesting school,· Aflach a cel·tificate qf occupancy, or equivalent certificate, appropriatej(JI· the proposed use (?[!he facility nt the new site; ((the specific focatio11 iJ not identified a/the li (?/the amendment request, this il?(ormationsha/1 he submitted prior to commencing any operations at that site.

3. Change Geogr phic Boundary (Expr nsion Amendment)- Requested effective date: --- 8

• School districts and charter schools in currently approve(\ boundary: Bf>eec<alJ\ClliLffl><O>J'JU:t--:II'-££fD)------------ Proposed new school districts and charter schools: _,R-"o"'-"u'-'n..._ct, ,R""'o"c"k'-.-LI-'S>JDL-----------------

Allach the wri!len board resolution, H'ilh the required language (.\·ee instructions), as described at the lop of the page; Allach evfden that impact stateme111s have been sent to school districts and charter schools within the geographic houndm:JI of the requesting scho Attach another sheet q(pc1per to describe the request, if necessary.

4. lncrease Maximum Enrollmenl (Exp;msion Amendment)* Requested effective dat.e: August 2008

Currently approved maximum enrollmenl:_-:3:-'0"-:0':-:------- Requested new total maximum enrollment: _1, ,_,0'-0"-"0'-----,---:c--

Attac:h a board !'&solution with the required language (see instructions); The ame11d111ent wi!ll?of be considered bJI the commissionc. without the appropriate board resolution Note that the resoh1tion required (or this IVQJj_ o(amenclnumt is differe11t fi'om that used fc othertJipes of amendments; Allach evidencr? that impact statements have heen sent to school di:·;fricfs and chcll'ter schools l<Jiithin the geographic boundary qfthe requesting sclwof.

D 5. Relocate Campus Ot' SHe- Requested effective da!e: _ County District Number: _ Current Address:--;-:;:-----, ------------------------ Proposed Address (if "va ilable): -,-----,---,---.,----;-:-.---:--:,-:;:-:-:----;;;;:-:::-- Is the proposed relocalion within the currently approved geographic boundary? No Yes Ifnol, see request above to Change Geographic Boundary. if tl1e amendment is approved, should mail be sent to the campus? 0 No 0 Yes

Attach the written board resolution as described at the top of the p'aie: Note that the proposed site must be within the currently approved geographic boundary. /fit is not, you must also submit an a,mendment request to extend the geographic boundary.

6. Other Ame11dment to Charter- Requested effective date:-------- Description:

Attach anplber sheet of paper to describe the request, if necessary

Signacin·e of ChanevSchool CEO


210-493-7356 Phone Nmnbcr

I -- ! /- (J ,> Dntc

e6

2),0 .375-9236 f<1X Number


Page e96

U282M110023 0023

Richard Milbum Academy, Inc., Charter Holder Board

Board Resolution Beaumont Expansion - Round Rock ISO

I 7 January, 2008

Having reviewed the TEA mandated Business Plan, the Board authorizes the Richard Milburn Academy, Beaumont. to submit a Charter Amendment Request to TEA (attached) requesting:

3. the addition of a site in the Round Rock ISO, and 4. the increase of maximum enrollment to 1 ,000.

These requests will be effective 1 August, 2008.

AFFI)VMED ;;;;/ DATE OPPOSED . . -7 I - Signflture ,d&£,, "' · · v ;-/ /J. vi Signnturc:

Print: /(/ [L;f.-J ,,,;? tf/Y /'()() Print:

Signflturc: t- 1- f7-tl.f Signature:

Print: /Vo.vtJNW...'L Print:

Sigm1ture: "f(llw</1-.f.<V r; w.1.l:r; J- n- o6 Signa tun :

Print: FI (/!IIOS .1 .>'il ;T[ Print:

Slgn.t\lllC .;?L/(f Sigllaturc:

P11n1 I 1-/(J&< $-f-.!J,J_ Corl (ey 1-1 z-o;? Print:

S1gnDIU1e a14.f2.it .r -11'!<t!{g1,. Signature:

Print: ££.4eS.t ('6ambers J- !.2 -(!''6 Print:


Page e97

U282M110023 0023

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1 70 I North Congress Ave.* A ustin, Texas 78701-1494 * 512/463-9734 * FA X: 512/463-9838 * http://www.tea.state.t x.us

,/ "'--,.,.,,

Robert Scott

/ f.·: 1

L ·'' · Commissioner

t · · I

4. ' ( i {.ill' I

..l . '. ''.....,.l.... \ .. ,

. ••. •.' ' • I I

'· ' I' J

·---...._.)

July 25, 2008

Dr. Norman Hall Richard Milburn Academy- Beaumont 1263 Terminal Loop McQueeney, TX 78123

Dear Dr. Hall:

The comm issione r has approved the following amendment requests:

• (028-08/1) to add a site in Round Rock, Texas effective August I, 2008; and

• (028-08/2) to expand the charter's geographic boundary to include Round Rock lSD effective August I ,

2008.

Approva l of any new or relocated campus and/or site is contingent upon the receipt of a certificate of occupancy or equivalent certificate appropriate for the proposed use of t he facility. A campus and/or site is not consid ered operat iona l until t he agency is in receipt of the appropriate cert ificate of occupancy. Please fax the certificate of occupancy, or equ ivalent certi ficate, to the Division of Charter Sc hool Administration at (512) 463-9732 prior to serv ing students at the ca m pus a nd/or site.

Itduring the 2008-2009 school yea r, the charter holder fails to open any campus and /or site a pproved by th is amendment, the a pprova l to add a campus and/or site is considered null a nd void.

If yo u have any questions, please contact Monica Sena-Martinez in the Di vision of Chat1er School Administration at (512) 463-9575.

Sincerely, Mary Perry, Director Charter School Administration


Page e98

U282M110023 0023

1263 Terminal Loop McQueeney, Texas 78155 Phone (830) 557-6181 • Fax (830) 557-5424


August 12, 2008

Ms. Mary Perry, Director

Charter School Administration

Texas Education Agency

1701 N01th Congress Avenue

Austin, Texas 78701

Ref: Approved Round Rock Amendment Request

Dear Ms. Perry:

This communication will acknowledge receipt of your letter conveying the Commissioner's

approval to add a site in Round Rock, Texas. Along with an extended geographical boundary

effective August I, 2008.

Due to the approval date of the new site we are still in the process of securing a facility along

with organizing our staff. We will keep you advised of our progress.

Sincerely,

Norrnan Hall

Superintendent


Page e99

U282M110023 0023

1263 Terminal Loop McQueeney, Texas 78155

Phone (830) 557-6181 • Fax (830) 557-5424


August 12, 2008

170 I North Congress Avenue

Austin, Texas 7870 I

Ref: Approved Arlington Amendment Request

Dear Ms. Perry:

This communication will acknowledge receipt of your letter

conveying the Commissioner's approval to add a site in

Arlington, Texas. Along with an extended geographical boundary

effective August I, 2008.

Due to the approval date of the new site we are still in the

process of securing a facility along with organizing our staff. We

will keep you advised of our progress.

Sincerely, Norman Hall

Superintendent


Page e100

U282M110023 0023

August 9, 2011

Peter Briggs, Chief Executive Officer


27 Congress S., Shetland Park #310

Salem, MA 01970-5523

Dear Mr. Briggs,

Capacity Builders, Inc. will be partnering with the Richard Milburn Academy, Inc., to evaluate the Department of Education’s Charter School Expansion and Replication grant: GO CAREER! GO COLLEGE! EXPANDING OPPORTUNITY FOR HIGH NEED STUDENTS, upon notification of award.

Capacity Builders, Inc. is an exceptionally qualified 501(c) 3 organization that will provide evaluation and capacity building services to enhance the Richard Milburn Academy’s ability to support your grant by acting as the evaluation solutions provider. We have a 15 plus year reputable history of performing research on more than 200 government grants. We will be able to dedicate one of our top researchers to perform the evaluation of this grant. We have a track record of performing similar evaluations for other agencies and foundations throughout the nation. In addition, we have never been sanctioned by a funder for not meeting the funder’s evaluation requirements.

Since 1995, Capacity Builders Inc. has been diligently serving the development needs of nonprofits, tribes, and governmental agencies. The central goal driving our organizational endeavors is to equip as many nonprofit and public leaders as humanly possible with no less than 100% of the resources needed to achieve these outcomes.

As stated above, we are a non-profit organization and a long-time member of the New Mexico Better Business Bureau (note that we have never had a complaint filed against us) that work diligently to enhance the education, economic independence, health, wellness, and overall quality of life for the current and future generation of Americans.


Page e101

U282M110023 0023

The specific functions of the stated parties when the grant term begins will be the following:

• When contracted to perform the evaluation service for the grant, Capacity Builders Inc. will recruit a University PhD to take on the role of Lead Evaluator. He/she will be responsible for collaborating with your organization and the funder on every aspect of the program evaluation.

• The Lead Evaluator will be responsible for facilitating and supporting all aspects of the program evaluation for the Richard Milburn Academy Inc. according to the outline in the proposal narrative as well as in accordance to any modifications made by the funder.

• The overall goal of the program evaluation will be to document activities outlined in the grant, provide on-going feedback regarding program effectiveness, provide guidance to reach the project goals, and guide plans to improve and sustain the project.

• The evaluation will include both formative and summative analysis of program effectiveness, and look at both qualitative and quantitative data.

• The Lead Evaluator will also oversee the development of all survey instruments specified in the proposal, oversight of all data collection/aggregation/reporting processes and coordinating the publication of any findings in scientific journals and other media.

• Capacity Builders, Inc. also agrees to use its online survey system and any research assistants that might be necessary.

This agreement shall be in force from the beginning of the grant award and renewable every year unless terminated in writing by one or both parties.

Thank you for allowing us to be a part of this project!

Sincerely,

Kristen S. Rivas Kristen S. Rivas, MS Ed, LADC

Post Awards Services Manager

Resource Associates: The Grant Experts

Capacity Builders Inc.

775-690-5992


Page e102

U282M110023 0023

PR/Award # U282M100015 e2


Page e103

U282M110023 0023



Page e104

U282M110023 0023



Page e105

U282M110023 0023



Page e106

U282M110023 0023


A 27 Congress Street, Shetland Park #310, Salem, MA 01970 Phone (978) 741-7161 • Fax (978) 741-0414


Attachment 4 - Schools Operated by Applicant

Provide information to show that the applicant operates more than one charter school, therefore meeting the Absolute Priority. Information should include school name, grade levels, location, whether the school holds a separate charter, and authorizer for each charter school operated by the applicant. If the applicant holds only one charter but operates multiple schools under the same charter, provide documentation demonstrating that they are separate and distinct schools, including, but not limited to:

Please refer to table below.

School Name

Grade

Location Separate Charter

Authorizer

Richard Milburn Academy of Florida, Inc. (Legal Name of Company)

RMA, Bradenton

9-12

Bradenton, FL

Yes The School Board of Manatee County

RMA, Fort Myers

9-12

Fort Myers, FL

Yes The School Board of Lee County

Lee Alternative Charter High School

9-12

Lehigh Acres, FL

Yes The School Board of Lee County

RMA West, Deland

9-12

Deland, FL

Yes The School Board of Volusia County

RMA, Daytona Beach

9-12

Daytona Beach, FL

Yes The School Board of Volusia County

School Name

Grade


Authorizer

Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. (Legal Name of Company)

RMA, Amarillo

9-12

Amarillo, TX

Yes Texas State Board of Education

RMA, Corpus Christi

9-12

Corpus Christi, TX


RMA, Killeen

9-12

Killeen, TX


School Name

Grade


Authorizer

Richard Milburn Academy of Texas, Inc. (Legal Name of Company)

RMA, Fort Worth

9-12

Fort Worth, TX


RMA, Suburban Houston

9-12

Houston, TX


RMA, Odessa

9-12

Odessa, TX


RMA, Lubbock

9-12

Lubbock, TX


RMA, Midland

9-12

Midland, TX



Page e107

U282M110023 0023



Phone (978) 741-7161 • Fax (978) 741-0414


a) A copy of the charter agreement Attached are the full Charter Agreements for Bradenton, FL and Corpus Christi, TX. Because we are close to the 8MB proposal limit, we are submitting only pertinent pages of the other eleven Charter Agreements. Upon request, we will then immediately forward the balance of those eleven Charter Agreements under separate cover.

b) Documentation of whether the charter schools were established and are recognized as

separate schools under state law (i.e., the applicable state statute or unique school identification number issued by the state)


City / State Where School is Located

State School Number Assigned

County Number Assigned by the State

Bradenton, FL 2107 Manatee (41) Deland, FL 7991 Volusia (64) Fort Myers, FL 4101 Lee (36) Lehigh Acres, FL 4235 Lee (36) Daytona Beach, FL 7891 Volusia (64)

Amarillo, TX 188801001 Potters County Corpus Christi, TX 178804001 Neuces County Killeen, TX 014801001 Bell County

Fort Worth, TX 220812001 Fort Worth County Suburban Houston, TX 101854001 Suburban Houston Lubbock, TX 068801003 Lubbock County Midland, TX 068801002 Midland County Odessa, TX 068801001 Ector County

c) A copy of the performance agreements with the authorized public chartering agency,

if different from the charter agreement At this time, no separate performance agreements exist.


Page e108

U282M110023 0023



Phone (978) 741-7161 • Fax (978) 741-0414


d) Physical locations of the schools Please refer to table below.

School Name Location

Richard Milburn Academy of Florida, Inc.

RMA, Bradenton 6210 17th Avenue West Bradenton, FL 34209

RMA, Fort Myers 3800 Evans Avenue Fort Myers, FL 33901

Lee Alternative Charter High School 1201 Taylor Lane Extension Lehigh Acres, FL 33936

RMA West, Deland 913 New York Avenue East Deland, FL 32724

RMA, Daytona Beach 1025 Mason Avenue, Unit 1031 Daytona Beach, FL 32114


RMA, Amarillo 4106 SW 51st Street Amarillo, TX 79109

RMA, Corpus Christi 5333 Everhart Road, Bldg C Corpus Christi, TX 78411

RMA, Killeen 1001 E. Veterans' Memorial Blvd., #301C Killeen, TX 76541

Richard Milburn Academy of Texas, Inc.

RMA, Fort Worth 6785 Camp Bowie Blvd., #200 Fort Worth, TX 76116

RMA, Suburban Houston 713 East Airtex Drive Houston, TX 77073

RMA, Odessa 2525 North Grandview, #600 Odessa, TX 79761

RMA, Lubbock 4902 34th Street, #10 Lubbock, TX 79410

RMA, Midland 3303 West Illinois, #14 Midland, TX 79703


Page e109

U282M110023 0023



Phone (978) 741-7161 • Fax (978) 741-0414


e) Documentation of whether the schools have separate facilities, staffs, and student bodies.


RMA, Bradenton 6210 17th Avenue West Bradenton, FL 34209 RMA West, Deland 913 New York Avenue East Deland, FL 32724 RMA, Fort Myers 3800 Evans Avenue Fort Myers, FL 33901 Lee Alternative Charter HS 1201 Taylor Lane Extension Lehigh Acres, FL 33936 RMA, Daytona Beach 1025 Mason Avenue, Unit 1031 Daytona Beach, FL 32114

RMA, Amarillo 4106 SW 51st Street Amarillo, TX 79109 RMA, Corpus Christi 5333 Everhart Road, Bldg C Corpus Christi, TX 78411 RMA, Killeen 1001 E. Veterans' Memorial Blvd., #301C Killeen, TX 78411

RMA, Fort Worth 6785 Camp Bowie Blvd.,#200 Fort Worth, TX 76116 RMA, Suburban Houston 713 East Airtex Drive Houston, TX 77073 RMA, Lubbock 4902 34th Street, #10 Lubbock, TX 79410 RMA, Midland 3303 West Illinois, #14 Midland, TX 79703 RMA, Odessa 2525 North Grandview, #600 Odessa, TX 79761


Page e110

U282M110023 0023



Phone (978) 741-7161 • Fax (978) 741-0414


f) Documentation of whether day to day operations at the separate schools are carried out by different administrators, and of whether schools are run by separate principals.


School Name Administrators Principal Richard Milburn Academy of Florida, Inc.

Dr. Houston Conley – President Art Sands – Area Director

RMA, Bradenton Krista Morton, School Director

RMA, Fort Myers

Irma Miller, School Director

Lee Alternative Charter High School

Art Sands, Interim School Director

RMA West, Deland Catherine Egley, School Director

RMA, Daytona Beach Sam Smith, School Director Richard Milburn Academy, Inc.

Administrators

Principal

Peter Briggs – President Norman Hall – Regional Director Sally Irvine – Asst. Regional Director

RMA, Amarillo Becky Pinson, School Director

RMA, Corpus Christi Denise Blanchard, School Director

RMA, Killeen Rose Thompson, School Director

Richard Milburn Academy of Texas, Inc.

Administrators

Principal

Peter Briggs – President Norman Hall – Regional Director Sally Irvine – Asst. Regional Director

RMA, Fort Worth Armard Anderson, School Director

RMA, Suburban Houston

Charles Climer, School Director

RMA, Odessa 'DJ' Hittinger, School Director RMA, Lubbock Starlette Gill, School Director RMA, Midland Teffanie White, School Director


Page e111

U282M110023 0023

Manatee County Public


RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY OF FLORIDA, INC. d/b/a RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY- MANATEE COUNTY

And THE SCHOOL BOARD OF MANATEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

For the School Years 2008-2013

I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

This is a Contract made and entered into between The School Board of Manatee County, Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "Sponsor", and Richard Milburn Academy of Florida, Inc., a non-profit organization organized under the laws of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "School". That legislation authorizes that: Charter schools shall be part of the state's program of public education. All charter schools in Florida are public schools.

It is the intent of the parties that this Charter shall constitute the School's charter.

A. GOVERNINGLAW

1. The Sponsor and the School agree to be bound by State and Federal law pertaining to Charter Schools and their operation. Both parties agree that Florida Statute1002.33, including other sections of the Florida School Code or Statutes referenced therein as applicable to charter schools and any subsequent changes, revisions, etc. to those statutes shall be the law by which the Sponsor and the School conduct their operations and. interactions. The terms and conditions for the operation of the School are set forth by the sponsor and the School in this written Charter. Should items in this Charter conflict with State or Federal law at any time, the law shall take precedence over the Charter.

2. The Sponsor shall not impose unreasonable rules or regulations that violate the

intent of giving charter schools greater flexibility to meet educational goals. The Sponsor's policies shall not apply to the School unless mutually agreed upon.

B. SCHOOL CONCEPT

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY- Manatee County will provide a

comprehensive alternative instructional program designed to meet and exceed the expectations of the State of Florida High Quality School Legislation and the No Child Left Behind Act Requirements (NCLB). The major components that will be provided are contained in Attachment 1 - The Richard Milburn Academy Education Plan.

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY- Manatee County, will provide students with a world-class learning opportunity by maintaining a caring learning environment; working with parents and the local community to develop the intellect and character of the students who choose to attend the school; utilizing innovative teaching techniques delivered by a qualified faculty; and offering a challenging curriculum that prepares children for lives of leadership in a rapidly changing world.


Page e112

U282M110023 0023


The school agrees to provide a quality educational program to all students, grades 9 through 12 residing in Manatee County who elect to attend in lieu of a traditional public school.

It is the intent of the parties that this Contract shall constitute the School's Charter. The

·application approved by the Sponsor on January 10, 2000 is incorporated by reference into this Charter Contract and is attached hereto as Appendix 2. If any provision of this Charter Contract is inconsistent with the application, the provisions of this Charter Contract shall prevail.

C. TERM OF CONTRACT

This Contract shall become effective as of June 30, 2008, or upon signing by both parties, and shall be for a term of five years commencing on July 1, 2008, and ending on June 30, 2013.

1. The timetable for implementation of this Charter shall be as follows: This charter

will be effective immediately upon signatures by both parties.

2. This Charter may be renewed as provided for in §1002.33, Florida Statute (2007).

3. This Charter may be modified during its term upon the approval of both parties and such modifications shall be in writing and executed by both parties.

4. At the end of the term of the Charter, the Sponsor may choose not to renew the

Charter for any of the following grounds:

a) Failure to participate in the state's education accountability system created in §1008.31, as required in this Charter section, or

b) Failure to meet the requirements for student performance stated in this Charter;

c) Failure to meet generally accepted standards of fiscal management; violation of law; and/or

d) Other good cause shown.

5. During the term of this Charter, the Sponsor may terminate the Charter for any of the grounds listed in paragraph (4) (a) - (d) as well as if insufficient progress has been made in attaining the student achievement objectives of this Charter and if the School is not likely that such objectives can be met before the expiration of the Charter. For purposes of this Charter, the term "good cause," as used in paragraph (4) (d) shall mean the following: A School's failure to materially comply with the terms and conditions of the Charter after being notified of its non:-s_9mpliance; and continuing failure by the School to cure its non-com13liance with the terms and conditions of the Charter after being issued the requisite notice under §1002.33(8), Florida Statute (2007).


Page e113

U282M110023 0023


I I ---·----------···-·····-·--------·--·--- --·-··---·------------···--·

6. At least ninety (90) calendar days prior to renevv'ing or terminating a Charter, the Sponsor shall notify the governing body of the School of the proposed action in writing. The notice shall state in reasonable detail the grounds for the proposed action and stipulate that the School's governing body may, within fourteen (14) calendar days after receiving the notice, request an informal hearing before the Sponsor. The Sponsor shall conduct the informal hearing \vitbin thirty (30) calendar days after receiving a written request. The School's governing body may, within fourteen (14) calendar days after receiving the Sponsor's decision to terminate or refusal to renew the Charter, appeal the decision pursuant to the procedure in §1002.33(8)(c), Florida Statute (2007).

7. This Charter may be terminated immediately if the Sponsor determines that good

cause has been shown or if the health, safety, or welfare of the students is threatened. The Sponsor may assume the operation of the School under these circumstances. The School agrees to submit to the Sponsor all records related to the School without undue delay and follow the termination procedures and practices developed. The Sponsor must provide the basis for termination in writing detailing the basis for this and such findings should be made concurrently with termination. The School's governing board may, within fourteen (14) calendar days after receiving the Sponsor's decision to terminate the Charter, appeal the decision pursuant to the procedure established in §1002.33(8)(d), Florida Statute (2007).

8. In case of termination of the Charter, the School shall be dissolved under the

provisions of law under which the School was organized. In that event, any property, improvements, furnishings, and equipment purchased with public funds shall automatically revert to the Sponsor (subject to any lawful liens and encumbrances). If the School's accounting records fail to clearly establish whether a particular asset was purchased with public funds or non-public funds, then it shall be presumed public funds were utilized and ownership of the asset shall automatically revert to the Sponsor. Property and assets purchased with public funds shall be defined as those goods purchased directly with grants and funds provided by a governmental entity. Property and assets purchased by an educational management organization in conjunction with operating the School shall not be deemed purchased with public funds.

9. In case of termination or non-renewal of the Charter, the School shall be

responsible for all the debts of the School. The Sponsor may not assume the debt from any Chartered services made between the governing body of the School, the management company, if applicable, and/or third party, except for a debt that is previously detailed and agreed upon in writing and executed with the same formalities as set forth in this Charter by both the Sponsor, the governing body of the School, and that may not reas.QQably be assumed to have been satisfied by the Sponsor.

10. It shall be understood that the School intends to renew this Charter unless the


Page e114

U282M110023 0023

# U282M100015

School notifies the Sponsor in writing no later than February 1, prior the expiration of this Charter as to the School's intent not to renew. The School agrees to submit all school records within 15 days of the expiration of this Charter if the School declines to renew the Charter.

11.. If this Charter is not renewed or is terminated, the School shall be responsible for

the debts of the School. The Sponsor shall not assume the debt from any Charter for services made between the governing body of the School and a third party, except for a debt that is previously detailed and agreed upon, in writing, by both the Sponsor and the governing body of the School and that may not reasonably be assumed to have been satisfied by the Sponsor.

12. The parties agree to modify this charter contract as necessary to provide for

compliance with Federal and state requirements that are applicable to charter schools.

D. DISPUTES

All disagreements relating to or arising out of the charter, which the parties are·unable to resolve informally, will be subject to the dispute resolution procedure as set forth in F. S. 1002.33 (6).

E. STATUTORY AND SPONSOR RULE REQUIREMENTS

1. The School shall operate in accordance with its Charter and shall be exempt from

all statutes in chapters 1000-1013 of the Florida School Code, with the exception of the following:

a. Those statutes specifically applying to charter schools, including §1002.33,

Florida Statute (2007). b. · Those statutes pertaining to the student assessment program and school

grading system. c. Those statutes, laws, rules, and regufations pertaining to the provision of

services to students with disabilities. d. Those statutes pertaining to civil rights, including §1000.05, Florida Statute

(2007), relating to discrimination. e. Those statutes, rules, and regulations pertaining to student health, safety, and

welfare.

2. Additionally, the School shall be in compliance with:

a. Section 286.011, Florida Statute (2007), relating to public meetings and records, public inspection, and criminal and civil penalties.·----.-..., .

b. Chapter 119, Florida Statute (2007), relating to public records. c. Chapter 112, Florida Statute (2007), relating to conflicts of interest.


Page e115

U282M110023 0023


3. The School's governing board may apply to the Co1mnissioner of Education for a

waiver of the provisions of Chapters 1000-1013, Florida Statutes, which are applicable to charter schools, as long as it does not affect funding allocations or create inequity in public school funding.

programs/activities and employment as required by federal and state laws, State Board of Education Administrative rules:

a. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis

of race, religion or national origin. b. Title VII of the:Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended prohibits discrimination

in employment on the basis of race, religion, gender or national origin. c. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 prohibits discrimination on

the basis of sex. No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.

d. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967' (ADEA) protects certain applicants and employees 40 years of age and older from discrimination on the basis of age in hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation, or terms, conditions or privileges of employment.

e. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits any individual who is otherwise qualified with a disability in the United States, as defined in section 706 (20) of this title, shall, solely by reason of his or her disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.

f. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in employment, public service, public accommodations and telecommunications.

g. The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) requires covered employers to grant family and temporary medical leave under certain circumstances to eligible employees up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job protected leave.

h. Florida Educational Equity Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, national origin, sex, handicap, or marital status against a student or an employee in the state system of public education. This section is aimed at equality of access for Underrepresented groups.

1. Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 secures for all individuals within the state freedom from discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status and thereby to protect their interest in personal dignity,. to-.make available to the state their full productive capacities, to secure the state against domestic strife and unrest, to preserve the public safety, health, and general welfare, and to promote the interests, rights, and privileges of individuals within the state.


Page e116

U282M110023 0023


}. .......--·-·------ ····-----··---· ·- -·-·-·····--··---·-·-··-·····-·--·-·

5. If the School chooses to use the Sponsor's internal purchasing process, the School shall comply with all of the Sponsor's rules regarding internal purchasing of supplies from the Sponsor's warehouse, -- textbook ordering, the processing of library media materials, and the marking and inventorying of fixed assets valued at $1000.00 or greater. ·

6. The School agrees to comply with subsection 3 (of section § 1012.465) which

states, that if it is found that a person who is employed or under Charter and does not meet the level 2 screening requirements, the person will be immediately suspended from working in that capacity and shall remain suspended until the final resolution of any appeals.

F. ANNUAL REPORT

The School shall make annual progress reports to its Sponsor as required in statute. Upon verification by the Sponsor, the report shall be forwarded to the Commissioner of Education. The annual report shall be made to the Sponsor on or before November 15. The report shall follow the Department of Education format and contain at least the following:

a. Student achievement performance data and student achievement information

required in the annual school report and the education accountability system governed by ss.1008.31 and §1008.345, Florida Statute (2007);

b. An audited financial record of the School which must include revenues and · expenditures at a level of detail that allows for analysis of the ability to meet financial obligations and timely repayment of debt in a form and manner consistent with state and Florida Red Book standards;

c. Documentation of the facilities in current use and any planned facilities for use by the School for instruction of students, administrative functions, or investment purposes;

d. Descriptive information about the School's personnel, including salary and benefit level of School employees, the proportions of instructional personnel who hold professional or temporary certificates, the proportion of instructional personnel teaching in-field or out-of-field and, the proportion of teachers meeting the high qualified teacher designation; and

e. Total number of available student stations by grade level; the projected number of students by grade level for five years or the planning period; and, any capital improvements plans including the number of student stations being increased or decreased by grade level for five years or the planning period.

G. LENGTH OF SCHOOL YEAR

The School shall provide instruction for at least the number of days required by law for other public schools. The School shall commence its initial start-up with the beginning of the public school calendar for Manatee County. The School may choose


Page e117

U282M110023 0023


I - -----------·--------·-·----- -----·-··-----------··-----·--·- --- ------------- -- -

to provide a summer school progra.iTI utilizing the Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI) funds provided by the State of Florida, or other available funds.

II. ACADEMIC ACCOUNTABILITY AND STUDENT PERFORMANCE

A. EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM

1. The School agrees to implement its educational and related programs as specified in the

School's approved application (Appendix 2) and the RMA Education Plan (Appendix 1), setting forth the School's curriculum, the instructional methods, any distinctive instructional techniques to be used, and the identification and acquisition of · appropriate. technologies needed to improve educational and administrative - · performance which include a means for promoting safe, ethical, and appropriate uses of technology which comply with legal and professional standards.

2. The School ensures that reading is a primary focus of the curriculum and that

resources are provided to identify and provide specialized instruction for students who are reading below grade level. Further, the curriculum and instructional strategies for reading - are consistent with the Sunshine · State Standards and are grounded in scientifically based reading research.

3. The Sponsor's Plan for Limited English Proficient Students is included in Appendix 2, which the School shall adopt or amend as agreed, or submit its own state approved document.

4. The School further agrees that its programs and operations shall be nonsectarian.

5. The School shall continue to provide staff development through a comprehensive plan

to support the classroom implementation of the school initiatives. The School will establish records or portfolios for all full-time instructional staff which detail their competencies within the academic design, such records or portfolios will be open to inspection by the Sponsor.

B. ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN

1. During the first year of the contract, the School agrees to establish the baseline

standard of achievement, to determine outcomes to be achieved, and to determine methods of measurement as identified in the School's approved application.

2. In subsequent years, the School agrees to show growth from the baseline student

achievement data. This Contract may be terminated by the Sponsor if insufficient progress has been made towards the goals and outcomes designated in the School Accountability Plan or the School receives a state designated grade of "F" in two of any four years.

3. In addition to evaluating the School's success in achieving the objectives stated in

either the application, all Charter schools will be held accountable for meeting the


Page e118

U282M110023 0023


·------- -·-----------------------·--- . --- --- ·--..--..·----- -------- .. _

State's student performance requirements as Q lineated in State Board of Education Administrative Rule 6A-1.09981, Implementation of Florida's System of School Improvement and Accountability. Specific Authority for this is found in §1001.02, §1008.33, and §1008.345, Florida Statute (2007).

4. The methods used to identify 'the educational strengths and needs of students and the

educational goals and performance standards are set forth in the School's approved application and the RMA Educational Plan.

5. The School shall ensure that its curriculum exposes students to the Sponsor's

curriculum frameworks to assist students who transfer into and out of the School.

6. The School agrees to allow the Sponsor reasonable access and to review data sources, including collection and recording procedures, in order to assist the Sponsor in making a valid determination about the degree to which student performance requirements, as stated in this Charter Contract have been met.

7. The School agrees to report annually all site generated test scores, class grades, and

· -student information in the appropriate format required by the Sponsor.

C. ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

1. All students at the School will participate in all State assessment programs and may participate in ·all district assessment programs in which the district students in comparable grades/schools participate. All School personnel involved with any aspect of the testing process must have knowledge of and abide by State (and, if applicable, Sponsor's) policies, procedures, and standards regarding test administration, test security, test audits, and reporting of test results.

2. When determining the baseline standard of achievement for students, the School shall

develop, maintain, monitor, track, and include the following:

a. How the baseline student academic achievement levels and prior rates of academic progress will be established.

b. How these baseline rates will be compared to rates of academic progress achieved by these same students while attending the School.

c. To the extent possible, how these rates of progress will be evaluated and compared with rates of progress of other closely comparable student populations.

d. Sponsor is required to provide academic student performance data to School for each of its students coming from Sponsor's system, as well as rates of academic progress of comparable student populations in Sponsor's system.

3. If an ESE student's IEP indicates an alternate assessment, in lieu of full or partial

participation in a State assessment, the School will facilitate the alternate


Page e119

U282M110023 0023


assessment and comply ·with State reporting procedures.

D. DATA USE AND ACCESS

1. The School agrees to use data provided through its participation with the Sponsor in

electronic data piocessing systems or TERMS pertaining to admissions; registration; and student records.

2. The School agrees to allow the Sponsor reasonable access to its facilities and records

to review data sources, including collection and recording procedures, in·. order to assist the Sponsor in making a valid determination about the degree to which student

· . performance requirements have been met as stated in the Contract, and required by § 1002.33.(23), Florida Statute (2007).

3. The Sponsor is required to provide to the State Board of Education and the

Commissioner of Education an analysis and comparison of the overall performance of the School's students. The parties agree that the Sponsor will use results from the State required assessment programs referenced in this Contract (and any of Sponsor's assessment programs in which the School elects· to participate) and the data elements to be included in the annual report which the School is required to submit pursuant to § 1002.33(23), Florida Statute (2007).

4. The Sponsor shall ensure that the School's program is consistent with the state

education goals established by § 1000.03(5), Florida Statute (2007). ....

5. The School will use records and grading procedures that adequately provide the information required by the Sponsor. This may be an alternative grading and recording system. The School's grading and recording system must be in accordance with the State's reporting guidelines.

6. The School may choose to follow the Sponsor's High School Academic Programs

Course Codes.

7. The School will maintain both active and archival records for current/former students in accordance with Florida Statutes.

8. All permanent cumulative records (Both Category A, Permanent Information and

Category B, Temporary Information) of students leaving the School, whether by transfer to a traditional public school within the school system, or withdrawal to attend another charter school, shall be transferred upon receipt of an official request from a receiving Manatee County public school or a charter school sponsored by The School Board of Manatee County, Florida. The School may retain copies of the departing student's academic records created during the student's attendance at the School.

9. Upon termination of a student's enrollment at the School, all permanent cumulative

records (Both Category A, Permanent Information, and Category B, Temporary

Manatee County Public Schools 9


Page e120

U282M110023 0023


Information) of students leaving the School, but not transferring to a v1anatee County public school or a charter school sponsored by The School Board of Manatee County, Florida, shall be maintained at the school as described in Chapters 110.07 and 228.093 of the Florida Statutes or until such time that the student returns to a Manatee County public school.

E. EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION

1. Exceptional education students shall be provided with programs implemented in

accordance with federal, state and local policies and procedures, (or other State approved procedures) and,. speCifically, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 2004 (IDEA), Section 504.of.the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, §1000.05, §1003.57, §1001.42 (4) (1), and §1002.33, Florida Statute (2007), and Chapter 6A-6 of the State Board of Education Administrative Rule. The School will be responsible for the delivery of all educational and related services indicated on the student's Individual Education Plan (IEP). Related services and programs e.g., speech/language therapy, occupational therapy, physical therapy, and counseling must be provided by the School staff or paid for through a separate contract.

2. The Sponsor will provide an ESE Specialist who will have the responsibility of

conducting the inithtl evaluation of students referred for potential ESE placement in accordance with federal and state mandates. All subsequent evaluations will be the responsibility of the School.

3. The Sponsor will provide an ESE Specialist for the review of the Matrix of Services

form following the completion or revision of an IEP.

4. If it is determined by an IEP committee that the needs of a student with disabilities cannot be met at the School, the School will work with the Sponsor to take steps to secure another placement for the student in accordance with federal and state mandates. The School will identify a person to serve as the Local Education Agency (LEA) when the IEP meeting is considering an initial placement, a change in placement, a dismissal from a program or a change in personnel assignments or reassignments.

5. Students with disabilities will be educated in the least restrictive environment. Those

students, whose needs cannot be adequately addressed at the School as determined by an IEP committee, will be appropriately referred; and the School staff will work together with the Sponsor's personnel to ensure that the needs of these students are met. The School's staff will work closely and as early as possible in the planning/development stages, with Sponsor staff to discuss the services needed by the School's students with disabilities.

6. In the event there is a Due Process Hearing in accordance with Section 615 of the

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act involving the provision of education and related services to a student with disabilities at the School, the School shall bear all


Page e121

U282M110023 0023


the costs of the hearing, including legal representation. In the event that the party representing the parents or guardians is prevailing, any and all attorneys fees awarded to prevailing party will be paid by the School.

7. Parents of students with disabilities will be afforded procedural safeguards in their

n :: +-iuP lo::tnnno::tnPc J.ih-if""''h 1nf""'lnr1P t'hP o::t-rPo::tco nf' nnttf""'P o::tnrl f""'nncoPnt 1n PnPnrlPn+ U.l,...l. Y V l''¥ .J. V Y\...1.1rt.l \...l..l.V fo,.l...l. .._,"""-JJI V.L .1. '\J L..L""' \..4... ..1."""'- '""'-'.L..1.1J'""..L..L'"'' ..L..\..1.."-+.....,_r'.....,..L.L"""""""..1..1.Lo

educational evaluations, confidentiality of student records, due process hearings and surrogate parents. Upon request by the School, the Sponsor will provide copies of complying procedural safeguards in whatever languages that the Sponsor has previously published or has available.

-.···F. ENGLISH SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES

1. The School will provide programs such as English for Speakers of other Languages

(ESOL) and services for Limited English Proficient (LEP) students according to Florida Statute and Florida State Board of Education Rules to meet the requirements of the Multicultural and Educational Training Advocacy Inc. (META) Consent Decree.

2. The Sponsor will monitor the ESOL program to ensure compliance with the Florida Administrative Code and all applicable federal and state laws and regulations including Florida statutes.

3. The School will ensure that teachers who have responsibility for the instruction of

LEP students received the appropriate training as required for ESOL certification and/or endorsement..

4. Every LEP student will have equal access to any and all programs available in the School. These include, but are not limited to programs for: exceptional student education, including gifted, vocational education and dropout prevention.

G. STUDENT PROGRESSION AND DISASTER PLANS

1. The School may adopt the Sponsor's "Student Progression Plan" (SPP), which is

attached as Appendix 3, with the exceptions attached in Appendix 3, or the School may develop its own SPP in accordance with applicable Florida State Statutes. This plan must be submitted to the Sponsor's Curriculum Committee for review prior to the first working day in June of the opening year and no later than sixty (60) days following Sponsor's approval of its SPP.

2. The School must be aware of what is in Sponsor's SPP and the School must write

exceptions for Sponsor's review.

3. The SPP is a document that is revised yearly; therefore the. _School agrees to implement the SPP for the current operational year. Notwithstanding the above acceptance of the Sponsor's SPP, the School and the Sponsor may agree to any additional reasonable exemptions from the SPP the School may wish. Any failure to


Page e122

U282M110023 0023


agree on exemptions shall not be considered a dispute.

4. The School will adopt the Sponsor's "School Emergency Response Plan," ("SERP")

which is attached as Appendix 4. Notwithstanding the above acceptance of the SERP, the School and the Sponsor may agree to any reasonable exemptions from the SEllP the School may wish. Any failure to agree on exemptions shall not be considered a dispute.

5. The School agrees to pursue and secure applicable certification/accreditation for its

educational program in order to ensure transferability of courses completed by the students at the School.

III. STUDENTS

A. DEFINITION OF STUDENTS

1. The school community to be served by RlCHARD MILBURN ACADEMY- Manatee

County, will serve any students, grades 9 through 12 residing in the cities and the County of Manatee who elect to attend in lieu of a traditional public school. . The .. School will be limited to no more than 300 students for the 2008-2009 school year, and a maximum student enrollment of350.

2. The School further agrees that it shall achieve a socio-economic balance reflective of

the "community" it serves, as defined above or within the socio-economic range of other public schools in the Sponsor's district; that it will not discriminate against students with disabilities who are served in Exceptional Student Education programs (ESE) and students who are served in English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) programs; and that it shall not violate the anti-discrimination provisions of Section 228.2001, Florida Statutes, the Florida Education Equity Act.

3. The School will guarantee that its admissions policies shall be nonsectarian.

B. ENROLLMENTPROCESS

1. The School agrees to enroll any eligible student who submits a timely and completed

application. However, if the number of applications exceeds the capacity of a program, class, grade level, or building all eligible applicants shall have an equal chance of being admitted through a random selection process that complies with Florida law.

2. The School may give enrollment preference to eligible siblings of students enrolled in

the School, to the child of an employee of the School, to the child of a member of the governing board of tbSchool or to any other student as authorized by Florida law. Preference may also be given to students living in the same household with an accepted/attending student (i.e., foster home, foreign exchange student) with appropriate documentation.


Page e123

U282M110023 0023


3. Informational meetings will be held by the School to inform interested parents/guardians of the mission of the School, the registration process, and required contractual obligations. The School will provide this information to parents/guardians in English as well as in other l nguages (e.g., Spanish and Haitian Creole).

4. If the target enrollment goal is not met, the School will give sufficient public notice

and extend the application deadline through August 1. Students applying during the extended timeline will be enrolled on a first-come, first serve basis.

5. If space becomes available during the academic year, admission will be given based

on a random selection of those desiring admission.· If the number of applicants is below the desired number of students, the School reserves the right to extend the application deadline provided sufficient public notice. ·

6. To require that each child who is entitled to initial admittance to any school in this

state present a certification of a school-entry health examination performed within 1 year prior to enrollment in school. Each child should also present or have on file a certification of immunization for the prevention of those communicable diseases for which immunization is required by the Department of Health.

7. To provide for appropriate screening of students for scoliosis at the proper age.

8. To maintain health records on each student. Where appropriate, schools should use

forms approved and provided by the Department of Health. These records become a part of each student's permanent record, to be transferred when the student transfers, is promoted, or changes schools.

C. WITHDRAWAL OR TRANSFER OF STUDENTS

1. The School may not withdraw or transfer a student involuntarily, unless the

withdrawal or transfer is accomplished through established, written administrative procedures mutually agreed upon in this Contract, or through existing administrative procedures in the Sponsor's Board Rules and/or Policies.

2. A student may withdraw from the School at any time and enroll in another public

school, as determined by the Sponsor's School Board rules.

D. DISCIPLINE

1. The School agrees to maintain a safe learning environment at all times. In order to provide criteria for addressing discipline issues that will ensure the health, safety and welfare of all students attending the School, the chool will adopt and follow the Sponsor's Code of Student Conduct with exceptions or as later modified which is attached as Appendix 5 until such time as the School develops and receives Sponsor's approval of its own Code of Conduct.


Page e124

U282M110023 0023


2. Students who attend the RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY- Manatee County, and their parents/guardians will enter into contracts with the School. Such contracts will detail the responsibilities staff members, students, and parents/guardians are expected to fulfill. If parents/guardians or students do not meet these obligations, it will be recm:n_mended that the student attend another school. ·

3. The School shall follow the federal and state requirements for the discipline of ESE

students.

4. Notwithstanding the above acceptance of the Sponsor's Code of Student Conduct, the School :and the Sponsor may agree to other reasonable exemptions from the Code. Any failure to agree on exemptions shall not be considered a dispute.

5. The School agrees that it will not engage in the corporal punishment of students.

6. The School may dismiss a student for conduct not subject to expulsion, but yet in

violation of the School's student contract. Similarly, the School may dismiss a student whose parent is in violation of the School's parent contract. Upon the School's decision to implement dismissal, the School shall refer the student to the Sponsor for appropriate placement with the district. The withdrawal or transfer will be accomplished based on established, written administrative procedures that have been shared with both parents and students.

7. The School agrees to refer any student recommended for expulsion to the Sponsor for

proper disposition.

E. EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES

1. The Sponsor agrees to support the School in its efforts to recognize student accomplishments. Such support shall include, but not be limited to, district competitions, district recognition programs, and district scholarship programs. If there are any costs not paid for or reimbursed by the State, then the School shall pay its pro rata share of the costs of such recognition programs.

2. The School's students may participate in extracurricular activities in accordance with

the provisions in §1002.33(11), Florida Statute (2007).

IV. FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY

A. GENERAL TERMS

1. Pursuant to section 1002.33(17), Florida Statutes (2007), students enrolled in. the _ School shall be funded as if they are in a basic program or a special program the same as students enrolled in other public schools in the· School District. The basis of the funding shall be the sum of the Sponsor's operating funds from the Florida Education


Page e125

U282M110023 0023


Finance Program (FEFP) as provided in Section 1011.62, Florida Statutes (2007), and the General Appropriations Act, including gross state and local funds, discretionary lottery funds, and funds from the Sponsor's current operating discretionary millage levy; divided by the total funded weighted full-time equivalent students (WFTE) in the Sponsor's district; multiplied by the WFTE of the School.

2. If the School's students or p:rograms meet the legal eligibility criteria, the School shall

be entitled to its proportionate share of categorical program funds included in the total available FEFP funds by the legislature, including transportation.

3. Total funding for the School shall. be recalculated during the year to reflect the

revised calculations under the FEFP by ;the state and the actual WFTE students reported by the School during the full-time equivalent survey periods designated by the Commissioner of Education.

4. With regard to any program or service provided by the Sponsor which is funded by

federal funds that follow an eligible student, the Sponsor agrees that if the same program or service is provided to an eligible student at the same level of service by ·the School, then upon ·receipt of· adequate documentation from the · School, the Sponsor shall transfer to the School the federal funds received by the Sponsor attributable to that student, provided that federal law or regulation does not prohibit such transfer of funds. All current federal funds will be forwarded to the School on an equitable basis. Sponsor will provide the calculation method and support documentation. Pursuant to provisions of 20. U.S.C. 8061 s. 10306, the School shall receive all federal funding for which the School is otherwise eligible, including Title I funding, not later than five (5) months after the School enrolls students for the start of the new school year. The IDEA discretionary portion of the IDEA appropriation will remain with the Sponsor to provide training as required by IDEA guidelines. All other IDEA funds will be distributed on a per student basis using all category areas. The School may participate in discretionary IDEA training offered by the Sponsor at no cost.

5. The Sponsor agrees to timely notify the School of all dates and other information

regarding reporting of student data, calendar of district in service opportunities, and other dates and information pertinent to the School's compliance with this Contract.

6. The Sponsor agrees to support the School in its efforts to secure grants by timely

processing and submitting all documentation prepared by the School and necessary for the School's competition for grants and other monetary awards, including, but not limited to, Federal Start-up Grant and Dissemination Grant.

7. The School agrees to comply with the Sponsor's rules, policies and procedures for

federal and state grant management which include submitting a Grant Application Executive Summary Form and grant description for each such grant processed, and submitting an annual End of the Year Grant Final Report.


Page e126

U282M110023 0023


8. Unless otherw·ise provided in tt.Js Contract, if the School's students, programs, staff

and/or facilities are used to generate funds for the Sponsor, the Sponsor agrees to give the School its proportionate share of federal and/or state funds generated. This includes any changes in law creating new categories of funds.

9. The School shall report its student enrollment to the Sponsor as required iri Section

1011.62, Florida Statutes (2007), and in accordance with the definitions in Section 1011.61, Florida Statutes (2007), at the agreed upon intervals and shall use the reporting method required by the Florida Department of Education (if any) and the Florida Auditor General (if any) when reporting cost data by program. The Sponsor

· shaH include the School's enrollment in the Sponsor's district ·· repo:i:t of- student ..·-enrollment.

10. The School shall not charge tuition or fees, except those fees normally charged by

other Manatee County public schools or as allowed by Florida law.

11. The Sponsor shall make certain that the School receives timely distribution of all funding for which School is eligible. Payment will be broken into twelve (12) monthly payments with ·no payment in June. Each payment shall be issued no later than ten (10) working days after Sponsor receives a distribution of state or federal funds. The first payment of every subsequent year shall be adjusted by any final amounts due to or from the Sponsor for services provided the School during the previous year as well as for administrative oversight. If a warrant for payment of a scheduled disbursement is not issued within thirty (30) working days after the receipt of funding by the Sponsor, the Sponsor shall pay to the School, in addition to the amount of the scheduled disbursement, interest at a rate of one percent (1%) per month calculated on a daily basis on the unpaid balance from the expiration of the thirty (30) day period until such time as the warrant is issued. The Sponsor will cooperate and assist the School, as required by Florida Statutes, to obtain capital outlay funding for which the School may be eligible. The School agrees to use procedures for submitting and approving requests for funding under §1013.62, Florida Statute (2007), Charter Schools Capital Outlay Funding.

B. ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT

1. The administrative fee charged by the Sponsor shall be limited to five percent (5%) of

available funds for the first 500 students as defined in § 1002.33(20)(a), Florida Statute (2007) not including capital outlay funds, federal and state grants, or any other funds, unless explicitly provided by law. The Sponsor will withhold indirect cost at the approved rate where authorized by the grant. If the School has a population of 501 or more students, the difference between the total administrative fee calculation and the amount of the administrative fee withheld may be used for capital outlay

. ...pttrposes specified in §1013.62(2), Florida Statute (2007). The Spon .gr_ shall not withhold an administrative fee from capital outlay funds unless it is authorized by Florida law. Access by the School to services not required in, but available through the Sponsor, may be negotiated separately by the parties. The Sponsor shall provide

Manatee County Public Schools

16


Page e127

U282M110023 0023

S OOO V\IG82':n # PJ8M'If/C:Id

-- ---- ---- ------···-·------

certain services to the School at no additional fee. The services shall include contract management services, FTE and data reporting, exceptional student education support, test administration services, including payment of the costs of state-required or district-required student assessments, processing of teacher certificate data, and information services, including equal access to student information systems that are used by public schools in the district in which the School is located. If goods and services are made available to the School they shall be provided to School at a rate no greater than the Sponsor's actual cost, unless otherwise agreed.

2. The Sponsor will charge the School for additional services that are beyond the scope

of the services described above provided the parties mutually agree in writing that the School shall be charged fo'SUch additional services prior to the rendering of such services. Payment shall be made to Sponsor upon submission of invoices to the School. Examples of such additional services are purchasing goods for the School, deliveries from.the Sponsor's warehouse to the School, electronic equipment repairs, and technological services and installation of dedicated telephone lines and participation in teacher training. This is not intended to be an exhaustive list.

3. The School shall utilize the standard state codification of accounts as contained- in the

Financial and Program Cost Accounting and Reporting· for Florida Schools (Red Book), as a means of codifying all transactions pertaining to its operations. Federal, state and local funds shall be maintained according to existing mandates and practices, i.e., separate funds and bank accounts for federal, state, and local funds as required under applicable statutes.

4. The School shall provide monthly financial statements to the Sponsor, which shall

include a balance sheet and a statement of revenues and expenditures and changes in fund balances prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles as specified in section (4) herein above and in a format to include a detail of all revenue and expenditure activities relating to its operations, and file the appropriate reports with the respective state and federal agencies. In the event the School elects to follow generally accepted accounting standards for not-for-profit organizations, it shall be reformatted for reporting purposes. Monthly fmancial statements shall be submitted to the Finance Department by the 20th day of the following month. Failure to timely submit monthly financial reports without reasonable cause shall constitute a material breach of this Contract.

5. The School shall provide the Sponsor with annual audited financial reports as of

November 1 of each year for inclusion in the Sponsor's financial statements. These reports shall include a complete set of annual financial statements and notes thereto, prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting principles and reflecting the detail of revenue sources and expenditures by function and object at a level of detail that allows for analysis ,_of the ability to meet financial obligations and timely repayment of debt. Additionally, the financial statements must be presented in the new format as required by Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement 34, applicable for state and local governments and their component units


17


Page e128

U282M110023 0023


h

which became effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2001. The follow·ing timeline must be adhered to for submitting the School's financial reports:

Unaudited Statements- NO LATER THAN AUGUST 15th OF EACH YEAR Audited Statements- NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 1ST OF EACH YEAR Cost Report- NO Li\TER THi\N AUGUST 151 OF EA.CH YEAR .

6. An annual financial audit, requested and paid for by the School, shall be performed

by a licensed Certified Public Accountant. The audit shall be performed in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards;· ·Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and the Rules of the Auditor General, Statof Florida. The School shall submitthis audit no later than the last working day in September including the information required in Section 1010.20, Florida Statutes (2007). In addition to conforming to applicable accounting standards and statutory requirements, the independent CPA shall consider appropriate analysis of financial trends and conditions. At a minimum, the independent CPA should examine the level of unreserved fund balance within the general fund in relation to general fund revenues. Such level should be 2.5% or higher. The Florida Office of the Auditor General has identified this percentage as indicating a minimum level of resources to be available for emergencies and unforeseen situations. The School further agrees to provide the Sponsor with a copy of such audit and the corresponding responses to the findings, which shall be bound together in one complete report. Furthermore, if the School's internal audit reveals a deficit financial position, the auditors are required to notify the School's governing board, the Sponsor, and the Department of Education. The Internal auditor shall report such findings in the form of an exit interview to the principal or the principal administrator of the Charter School and the chair of the governing board within seven (7) working days after finding the deficit position. A final report shall be provided to the entire governing board, the Sponsor and the Department of Education within fourteen (14) working days after the exit interview. Funding for any subsequent year or Contract extension, if approved by the School Board, shall be contingent upon the receipt and subsequent approval of the audit by the Sponsor and/or its representatives, and such funding shall be adjusted as necessary to reflect audit results. Additionally, failure of the School to comply with the timely submission of all financial statements will result in the Sponsor's withholding of subsequent payments to the School without penalty of interest as described in Part IV (5) of this Contract until such time as the statements are received. The Sponsor reserves the right to perform additional audits at its expense as part of the Sponsor's financial monitoring responsibilities as it deems necessary. The Sponsor will notify the School of this procedure in a timely manner consistent with the notification given to other public schools. Additionally, a cumulative listing of all property valued over $1,000 purchased with public funds i.e., FEFP, grant, and any other public-generated funds; and a cumulative listing of all property valued at more than $1,000 purchased with private funds will be submitted yearly along with the annual audited financial statements. These lists will include: (1) date of purchase; (2) item purchased; (3) cost of item; and (4) item location. If the School has been granted tax-exempt status, the School will provide the Sponsor with


18


Page e129

U282M110023 0023

19


a copy of correspondence from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) granting tax- exempt status as a section 501(c)(3) organization. In the event it is not included in the audit report, the School also will provide the Sponsor a copy of its Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax, and all schedules and attachments, within fifteen (15) days of filing with the IRS. If the IRS does not require Form 990 to be filedthe School will provide the Sponsor with written confirmation from the IRS of such non-requirement. Notwithstanding anything set forth in this Contract, the Sponsor does not covenant to extend or pledge its tax-exempt authority in any way for the use and benefit of the School.

7. ·The Sponsor .reserves the right to require the School and the School agrees to adhere .

to any additional.financial requirements mandated by the State and/or Federal laws and regulations.

8. The School shall not suggest or represent to third parties, including, but not limited

to, vendors, creditors, other business entities or their representatives, governmental entities, or other individuals, that the Sponsor will guarantee payment for any purchases made or debts incurred by the School, nor shall the School represent that

· the Sponsor will guarantee payment for any loans secured by the School, or that the Sponsor will lend its good faith and credit in order for the School to obtain a loan or other forms of credit.

9. The School will maintain financial viability, which includes, but is not limited to,

maintaining adequate. cash flow to meet salary and benefits requirements and meeting financial obligations to vendors and the Sponsor. The parties agree that the submission of the School's approved budget shall satisfy this requirement. Pursuant to section 1002.33(9) G), Florida Statutes (2007), the School's governing board shall adopt and maintain an annual budget. Provided further that the School agrees that any adopted budgets shall be balanced budgets. The School agrees to transmit to the Sponsor a copy of the School's adopted budget at the beginning of the Sponsor's fiscal year

C. TRANSPORTATION

1. Pursuant to section 1002.33(20)(c), Florida Statutes (2007), the School agrees to

provide for transportation of the School's students consistent with the requirements of Chapter 1006, Florida Statutes. At the discretion of the School's governing body, transportation may be provided through private providers who meet all applicable State and Sponsor's safety and transportation standards with funds allocated to eligible students. The School and the Sponsor shall cooperate in making arrangements that ensure that transportation is not a barrier to equal access for all students residing within a reasonable distance of the School. Notwithstanding this section, the governing board of the School may, at its discretion, provide transportation to students outside the "reasonable distance" area.


Page e130

U282M110023 0023


2. The School and the Sponsor, if agreeable to the Sponsor, may enter into a separate

contract for the provision of transportation services.

3. If applicable, the School will provide the Sponsor the name of the private transportation provider and a copy of the signed transportation contract ten (10) u··r{)r-koin-a-.rl.:::1-vnr-rt{)rz:t:{,) -th.P;. {-)n-P.n-in·a fbv {)f f'l P.

D. FOOD SERVICE

1. Responsibilities for providing food and related services, and meeting reporting

requirements will be assumed by the School. · The School may contract with the Sponsor if the Sponsor is agreeable to provide. food service for the term of which will be set forth in a separate annual contract.

2. If the School desires to provide meals for students not eligible for free and reduced

priced meals, the Sponsor will provide such meals at the regular rate per student. If the Sponsor's meal service is utilized, the School and the Sponsor will enter into a separate contract for such food service.

E.FTE

1. The School must provide the Sponsor with the following year's projected FTE by

December 15 of the current year. The Sponsor may initially calculate monthly distribution to the School until the results of the October FTE become available.

2. Any eligible student enrolled in the School shall be provided federal funds for the

same level of service provided other eligible students in the schools operated by the Sponsor, including Title I funding.

3. Total funding shall be recalculated during the school year to reflect actual WFTE

students reported by the School during the FTE student survey periods. Additionally, funding for the School shall be adjusted during the year as follows:

a. In the event of a state holdback or a proration, which reduces or increases

district funding, the School's funding will be reduced or increased proportionately. The Sponsor will not be responsible for any liabilities incurred by the School in the event of a state holdback.

b. In the event that the district exceeds the state cap for WFTE for Group 2 programs established by the Legislature, resulting in unfunded WFTE for the district, then the School's funding shall be reduced to reflect its proportional share of any unfunded WFTE.

4. The School shall not levy taxes or issue bonds secured by tax revenue.

5. All payments shall be made to the School no later than the 15th of each month from

July through May.


Page e131

U282M110023 0023


F. MONITORING

The parties agree that the Sponsor, with reasonable notice, may schedule and perform monitoring site visits at any time and up to four (4) times a year. This does not preclude additional unscheduled site visits as deemed necessary by the Sponsor. These site visits will monitor school operations and student performances and the School shall provide responses in a timely manner or within thirty days of receipt of said requests.

G. TITLEI

. . 1. If _the, chool is eligible, any Title I funds allocated to the School must ..qe usd to

supplement students greatest instructional needs that have been identifiea· by a comprehensive needs assessment of the entire School and shall be spent in accordance with federal regulations. The School's eligibility to receive Title I funds will be based on the percentage of students participating in the Free and/or Reduced Price Lunch Program as determined by an Economic Survey using a predetermined cut-off level established by the Sponsor.

2. The per pupil allocation of Title I funds will be determined annually in accordance

with the economic survey conducted by the Sponsor for that purpose. The allocation of Title I Funds shall be made in accordance with the Public Charter Extension Act of 1998 and all corresponding guidance and regulations.

3. Any capital outlay item purchased with Title I funds costing $250 or more, which is

classified as Audio Visual, Software, Furniture or Equipment remains the property of Title I. This property must be identified and labeled for Title I property audits.

4. Schools receiving Title I funds will employ highly qualified staff: teachers that are

certified and teaching infield; para-educators with two years of college or that have passed an equivalent exam.

5. If the School accepts Title I funds, at least one percent of the Title I funds budget

must be spent in support of parental involvement activities.

6. The district and regional Title I staff will provide technical assistance and support in order to ensure that Title I guidelines are being followed at the School and that students are meeting or exceeding high content and performance standards.

H. GRANTS

1. When the funding source requires that the Sponsor serve as the fiscal agent for a

grant, the School shall, prior to generating any paperwork to the funding agency, notizy'"""fne Sponsor in writing of its intent to submit a grant application ancCattach grant application guidelines.


Page e132

U282M110023 0023


2. If the Sponsor develops a districtwide grant, the School may be included in the

district proposal, if mutually agreed to by the School and the Sponsor.

3. When grant proposals are developed by district staff using student or school counts that include the students of the School, and the grant is awarded to the Sponsor, the pro rata share of the dollars or services received from that grant shall be distributed to the School, as defined in the budget developed for the grant.

4. When a charter school elects to participate in a districtwide grant prepared by the

Sponsor's staff, dollars and/or services distributed via grant funds will be provided to charter schools in the same manner as traditional public schools.

I. REPORTING OF STUDENTS

1. In order to facilitate the School's reporting requirements as reflected in the law and in

order to provide continuous data for students participating in the School, the parties agree that the School will use the Sponsor's electronic data processing systems and procedures for the processing of student enroliment, attendance, FTE coiiection, and assessment information. The. Sponsor will analyze the School's facility and develop a hardware/software solution which provides the School with limited access to the Sponsor's data processing systems. The School will provide hardware and related infrastructure. There will be no cost to the School for the related installation of software programs.

2. The Sponsor will also provide training for the School's personnel in the use of

designated district applications necessary to respond to the requirements of§1008.345, Florida Statute (2007), including the annual report and the state/district required assessment program. The Sponsor's support for this function will be provided at cost and will not exceed the administrative fee provided in the law. Access by the School to additional data processing applications not required by law but available through the Sponsor may be negotiated separately by the parties.

3. If the School submits data relevant to FTE funding that is later determined through the

audit procedure to be inaccurate, the School shall be responsible for any reimbursement to the state for any errors or omissions for which the School is responsible. Likewise, if the Sponsor submits data relevant to FTE funding that that was properly and accurately reported by the School and it is later determined through the audit procedure to be inaccurate, the Sponsor shall be responsible for any reimbursement to the School of all monies that were withheld or deducted because of the inaccurate report. The monies shall be paid in a lump sum in the next month follov"ing the determination of the inaccurate report.

4. Access by the School to materials and forms not required by law but available through

the Sponsor may be negotiated separateiy by both parties.

5. Prior to the opening of school each year, the School shall report to the Sponsor the



Page e133

U282M110023 0023


names and addresses of all registered students. The School will report the monthly attendance of each student to the sponsor in the format appropriate for the District to meet attendance reporting requirements. Documentation of student withdrawals shall be entered in the student information system within ten school days.

VFACILITIES

1. The School agrees to use facilities which comply with the Florida Building

Code pursuant to Chapter 553 except for the State Requirements for Educational Facilities. The School is not required to comply, but may choose to -comply, with the

· State Requirements for Educational Facilities of the Florida.Building Code adopted pursuant to F.S 1013.37 (2007). The School has sole discretion_ as· to which code the facility must meet. All inspections (Health, Fire and Certificates of Occupancy) shall be included in the annual report for each year. Written evidence of inspections and certificates of occupancy for a public school building shall be delivered to the Sponsor immediately preceding the opening of school.

2. Neither the local governing authority nor the Sponsor shall adopt or impose local

building requirements or restrictions that are more stringent than those found in the Florida Building Code. The agency having jurisdiction for inspection of the facility and issuance of a certificate of occupancy shall be the local municipality or, in an unincorporated area, the county governing authority. F.S. 1002.33 (18) (a) (2007).

3. The School shall use facilities that comply with the Florida Fire Prevention Code,

pursuant to F.S. 633.025, as adopted by the authority in whose jurisdiction the facility is located as provided in paragraph 2 above. · ·

4. The School shall provide the Sponsor with a list of the facilities to be used and their

location. The School must provide a copy of certificate of occupancy.

5. If the Sponsor has facilities or property available as surplus, marked for disposal, or otherwise unused, it shall be provided for the School's use on the same basis as it is made available to other public schools. The School may not sell or dispose of such property without the written permission of the Sponsor. The School agrees to establish a system of accounting for fixed assets in accordance with the Rules of the Auditor General10.400.

6. In the event School is dissolved or terminated, all of the School's property

improvements, furnishings, and equipment purchased with public funds, in part or in whole, or surplus property obtained from the Sponsor shall be delivered to the Sponsor and automatically revert to full ownership by the Sponsor. Donated property, furnishings, equipment, etc. remain the property of Renaissance Arts and Education, Inc., the parent corporation of the School.

7. The School shall establish and maintain a property inventory and label all purchases

of items that cost more than $1000.00 in public funds. The School shall provide a



Page e134

U282M110023 0023


copy of the property inventory to the Sponsor each year as part of its annual report. The property inventory shall show the status of all such property including but not limited to the location of all such property.

8. The Sponsor shall annually provide to the Department of Education as part of its 5-

year work plan the number of existing vacant classrooms in each school the district does not intend to use or does not project will be needed for educational purposes for the following school year. The Department of Education may recommend that the Sponsor make such space available to the School. F.S. 1002.33 (18) (g) (2007).

9. The School agrees. not to affix any religious symbols, statutes, artifacts, etc., on or

about the property·and facilities where the School will operate.

VI. INSURANCE & INDEMNIFICATION

A. EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE

The School shall provide evidence of liability insurance in the following manner:

1. As evidence of compliance with the insurance required by this contract, the School shall furnish the Sponsor with fully completed certificate(s) of insurance signed by an authorized representative of the insurer(s) providing the coverage before the initial opening day of classes.

2. The evidence of insurance shall provide that the Sponsor be given no less t an sixty

(60) days written notice prior to cancellation.

3. Until such time as the insurance is no longer required to be maintained by the School, the School shall provide the Sponsor with evidence of the renewal or replacement of the insurance no less than 30 days before the expiration or termination of the required insurance for which evidence was provided. Failure to comply with this section or to maintain the requisite insurance coverage shall constitute a material breach of this contract.

B. REQUIREMENTS OF INSURANCE

1. Insurance required under the terms of this contract must either be authorized by

subsisting certificates of authority by the Department of Financial Services of the State of Florida or an eligible surplus lines insurer under Florida Statutes. In addition, the insurer must have a Best's Rating of "A" or better and a Financial Size Category of "VI" or better, according to the latest edition of Best's Key Rating Guide, published by A.M. Best Company.

2. If, during this period when an insurer is providing the insurance as required by this

Contract, an insurer fails to comply with the foregoing minimum requirements, as soon as the School has knowledge of any such failure, the School shall immediately


24


Page e135

U282M110023 0023


notify the Sponsor and promptly replace the insurance provided by the insurer with another insurer meeting the requirements. Such replacement insurance coverage must be obtained within twenty (20) days of cancellation or lapse of coverage.

3. Without limiting any of the other obligations or liabilities of the School, the School

- shall, at the School's sole expense,-procure, maintain and keep in force the amounts and types of insurance conforming to the minimum requirements set forth in this Contract. Except as otherwise specified in this Contract, the insurance shall commence prior to the commencement of the opening of the School and shall be maintained in force, without interruption, until this Contract is terminated.

C. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE:

Except as otherwise provided, the Commercial General Liability Insurance provided by the School shall conform to the requirements hereinafter set forth:

1. The School's insurance shall cover the School for those sources of liability

(including, but not by way of limitation, coverage for operations, Products/Compieted Operations, independent contractors, and liability contractually assumed) _which would be covered by the latest occurrence form edition of the standard Commercial General Liability Coverage Form (ISO Form CG 00 01), as filed for use in the State of Florida by the Insurance Services Office.

2. The minimum limits to be maintained by the School (inclusive of any amounts

provided by an umbrella or excess policy) shall be $1 million per occurrence/$3 million annual aggregate. The Sponsor will be notified when 50% of any aggregate limit has been incurred.

3. Except with respect to coverage for Property Damage Liability, the Commercial

General Liability coverage shall apply on a first dollar basis without application of any deductible or self-insured retention. The coverage for Property Damage Liability may be subject to a maximum deductible of $1,000 per occurrence.

4. The School shall include the Sponsor and its members, officers, and employees as

Additional Insured on the required Commercial General Liability Insurance. The coverage afforded such Additional Insured shall be no more restrictive than that which would be afforded by adding the Sponsor as Additional Insured using the latest Additional Insured - Owners, Lessees or Contractors (Form B) Endorsement (ISO Form CG 20 10). The certificate of insurance shall be clearly marked to reflect "The Sponsor, its members, officers, employees, and agents as Additional Insured."

D. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Automobile Liability Insurance provided by the School shall conform to the following requirements:



Page e136

U282M110023 0023


1. The School's insurance shall cover the School for those sources of liability which

would be covered by Section II of the latest occurrence edition of the standard Business Auto Policy (ISO Form CA 00 01), including coverage for liability contractually assumed, as filed for use in the State of Florida by the Insurance Services Office.

2. Coverage shall be included on all owned, non-owned, and hired autos used 1n

connection with this Contract.

3. The minimum· limits to be maintained by the School (inclusive of any amounts provided by an umbrella or excess policy) shall be $1 million per occurrence, a11d if subject to an annual aggregate, $3 million annual aggregate.

4. The automobile -liability policy will include a provision naming the Sponsor as an

additional insured.

5. If transportation service is contracted, the transportation provider shall name the School Board of Manatee County as an additional insured.

E. WORKERS' COMPENSATION/EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation/Employers' Liability Insurance provided by the School shall conform to the following requirements:

1. The School's insurance shall cover the School (and to the extent its subcontractors

and its sub-subcontractors are not otherwise insured), for those sources of liability which would be covered by the latest edition of the standard Workers' Compensation Policy, as filed for use in Florida by the National Council on Compensation Insurance, without restrictive endorsements. In addition to coverage for the Florida Workers' Compensation Act, where appropriate, coverage is to be included for the Federal Employers' Liability Act and any other applicable federal or state law.

2. Subject to the restrictions found in the standard Workers' Compensation Policy,

there shall be no maximum limit on the amount of coverage for liability imposed by the Florida Workers' Compensation Act or any other coverage customarily insured under Part One of the standard Workers' Compensation Policy. The minimum amount of coverage for those coverage's customarily insured under Part Two of the standard Workers' Compensation Policy shall be: EL Each Accident: $500,000; EL Disease-Policy Limit: $500,000; EL Disease-Each Employee: $500,000.

3. Volunteers will be covered by the School's workers compensation policy, or the

School must provide additional indemnification for any injury or property damage sustained by a volunteer.



Page e137

U282M110023 0023


F. SCHOOL LEADER'S ERRORS AND OMISSIONS LIABILITY INSURANCE

The School shall provide, subject to reasonable commercial availability, the School Leader's Errors and Omissions Liability Insurance conforming to the following requirements:

1. The School Leader's Errors and Omissions Liability Insurance shall be on a form

acceptable to the Sponsor and shall cover the School for those sources of liability typically insured by School Leader's Errors and Omissions Liability Insurance. This coverage addresses liability arising out ·0f the rendering or failure to render professional services in the performance of this Contract, including all provisions of indemnification, which is part of this Contract.

2. The insurance shall be subject to a maximum deductible not to exceed $25,000 per

claim.

3. If on a claims-made basis, the School shall maintain, without interruption, the Professional Liability Insurance until three· (3) years after termination of this Contract.

4. The minimum limits to be maintained by the School inclusive of any amounts

provided by an umbrella or excess policy, shall be $1 million per claim/annual aggregate.

5. If the School Leader's Error and Omissions liability insurance required hereby is not

reasonably commercially available the School shall provide Officers, Directors, and Employees Errors and Omissions liability insurance in lieu thereof with the same minimum limits of coverage as set forth above.

G. PROPERTYINSURANCE

1. (Leased property).If the School leases the site location, then the School shall provide

on a form acceptable to the Sponsor no later than ten (10) days prior to the opening of school, evidence of Business Personal Property Insurance, to include funiiture, fixtures, equipment and machinery used in the School.

2 The School will secure and maintain Property Insurance for special perils (all risk)

with limits mutually acceptable to the School and lien holder(s) but, not less than one hundred percent (100%) of replacement value of all contents therein which are owned by the Sponsor.

H. APPLICABLE TO ALL COVERAGES

1. The insurance provided by the School shall apply on a primary basis and any other

insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Sponsor or its members, officers, employees or agents, shall be in excess of the insurance provided by or on behalf of


Page e138

U282M110023 0023

Commercial General Liability Insurance. In addition, the School shall

# U282M100015

the School. Except as otherwise specified, the insurance maintained by the School shall apply on a first dollar basis without application of deductible or self-insurance retention. Compliance with the insurance requirements of this Contract shall not limit the liability of the School, its subcontractors, its sub-subcontractors, its employees or its agents to the Sponsor or others. Any remedy provided to the Sponsor or its members, officers, employees or agents by the insurance shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any other remedy available under the Contract or otherwise.

2. The School shall require its subcontractors and its sub-subcontractors to maintain any

and all insurance required by law. Except to the extent required by law, this, Contract does not establish minimum insurance requirements for su contractors or

... sub-subcontractors.

3. Neither approval by the Sponsor nor failure to disapprove the insurance fumi hed by the School shall relieve the School of the School's full responsibility to provide the insurance as required by this Contract. The School shall be in default of this Contract for failure to maintain such insurance as required by this Contract, provided further that the insurance requirements in this Contract shail not be construed to waive the Sponsor's sovereign immunity or limits of liability set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statute (2007).

I. INDEMNIFICATION

1. The School agrees to indemnify and defend with competent counsel and hold the

Sponsor, its members, officers, and agents, harmless from any and all claims, actions, costs, expenses, damages, and liabilities, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising out of, connected with or resulting from: (a) the negligence of the School's employees, contractors, subcontractors, or other agents in connection with and arising out of their services within the scope of this agreement; (b) disciplinary action or the termination of a School employee; (c) the debts accrued by the School and/or non- payment of same; (d) the School's material breach of this agreement or violation of law; (e) any failure by the School to pay its suppliers or any subcontractors, or (f) personal injury, property damage, or violations of civil rights that may arise out of, or by reason of actions of the School and/or its employees, agents, and representatives. However, the School shall not be obligated to indemnify the Sponsor, against claims, damages, expenses or liabilities to the extent these may result from the negligence of the Sponsor, its directors, officers, employees, and subcontractors. The duty to indemnify for professional liability as insured by the School Leaders Errors and Omissions Liability Policy described in this Contract will continue in full force and effect notwithstanding the expiration or early termination of this Contract with respect to any claims based on facts or conditions which occurred prior to termination. In no way shall the School Leader's Errors and Omissions Liability Policy three (3) year limitation on post-termination claims of professional liability impair the Sponsor's claims to indemnification with respect to a claim for which the School is insured or for which the School should have been insured under


Page e139

U282M110023 0023

6. No member of the School's governing board will receive compensation, directly or


defend and protect and hold the Sponsor harmless against all claims and actions brought against the Sponsor by reason of any actual or alleged infringement of patent or other proprietary rights in any material, process, machine or appliance used by the School.

2. The School'shall notify the Sponsor of the existence of any third party claim, demand

or other action giving rise to a claim for indemnification under this provision (a "Third Party Claim") and shall give each other a reasonable opportunity to defend the same at its own expense and with its own counsel, provided that the Sponsor shall at all times have the right to participate in such defense at its own expense. If, within a reasonable amount of time after receipt of notice of a Third Party Claim, the School shall fail to undertake to so ,-defend, the other party shall have the right, but not the obligation, to defend and to compromise or settle (exercising reasonable business judgment) the Third Party Claim-for the account and at the risk and expense of the School which the School agrees to assume. The School or the Sponsor shall make available to each other, at their expense such information and assistance as each shall request in connection with the defense of a Third Party Claim.

3. The School's indemnity obligations under this provision and elsewhere in. the

Contract shall survive the expiration or termination of this Contract.

VII. GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE

A. REQUIREMENTS

1. Richard Milburn Academy- Manatee County shall be a Florida not for profit entity, and a governing board, shall manage its activities and affairs. Voting shall control the corporation, and only the governing board shall vote. The officers shall consist of a president, a vice president, a treasurer, and a secretary.

2. The School's governing body shall be made up of its governing board. This board

will define and refine policies regarding educational philosophy, and oversee assessment and accountability procedures to assure that the School's student performance standards are met or exceeded.

3. The School's governing board will include representation from parents/guardians and

professionals qualified to support the educational and moral development of the School's students.

4. Within 45 days of appointment to the School's governing board, the members shall be

fingerprinted pursuant to § 1002.33(12)(g) Florida Statute(2007).

5. The teachers, support, and contractual staff will be directly supervised by the Principal. ,._ .:


Page e140

U282M110023 0023

# U282M100015

indirectly from the School's operations. Violation of this provision shall constitute a material breach of the Contract.

7. To insure that parents/guardians will have ready access to the governance of the

School, board meetings will be open to the public in accordance with §286.011, Florida StatUte (2007), and public notice shatl be given in a timely manner.

8. The School will comply with §1002.33(16) (b)(2), Florida Statute(2007), relating to

public records.

9. The School agrees to allow reasonable access to its facilities- and records to duly authorized representatives of the Sponsor. Conversely, the .Sponsor agrees to allow reasonable access to its records to duly authorized representatives- of the School to the extent allowable by law. Failure to provide such access will. co_nstitute a material breach of this Contract.

B. MANAGEMENT COMPANIES

1. If a management company will be .operating the School, the contract between the

management company and the governing body of the School shall be submitted to the Sponsor prior to the approval of the School's Contract. All amendments to the contract between the management company and the governing body of the School shall be submitted to the Sponsor within five (5) days of execution.

2. The contract between the governing body of the School and the management

company shall require that the management company operate the School in accordance with the terms stipulated in the School's Contract and all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations.

3. Any default or breach of the terms of this Contract by the management company shall

constitute a default or breach under the terms of the Contract between the School and Sponsor.

VIII. HUMAN RESOURCES

A. HIRING PRACTICES

1. The School shall hire its own employees. Leave will be available to Sponsor's employees as contemplated in Section 1002.33(12) Florida Statutes (2007) and/or other leave arrangements approved by Sponsor.

2. The School agrees to hire the equivalent of a full-time administrator and sufficient

instructional and support staff to meet the pupil-teacher ratios and services as described in the approved charter application and according: to any statutory guidelines.



Page e141

U282M110023 0023

# U282M100015

- -----·-···-····------- -------·-----···- ---------·--- - - -- ---·---·--------·-

3. The School agrees that its employment practices shall be nonsectarian and non- discriminatory. The School's governing board will determine salaries, benefits, and Position/Title classification, provided that the School's governing board may establish any additional positions it deems necessary.

4. The School shall be responsible for promoting diversity in its staff.

5. All teachers employed by or under contract to the School shall be certified as required

by Chapter 1012, Florida Statutes and any other applicable state or federal law.

6. The School agres not to knowingly employ an individual for instructional services if the individual's Gertific_ tion or licensure as an educator is suspended or revoked by this or any other state.

7. The School agrees not to knowingly employ an individual who has resigned in lieu of

disciplinary action with respect to child welfare or safety or who has been dismissed for just cause by any school district with respect to child welfare or safety.

8. _The School agrees. to fingerprint at its cost all applicants for instructional and non-

instructional positions including contracted personnel, as required by §1012.32(2)(a), Florida Statute (2007). The Sponsor shall perform the processing of each applicant's fingerprints. The School agrees that new applicants shall be on probationary status pending fingerprint processing and determination of compliance with standards of good moral character. These fingerprints shall be submitted to the Florida Department -of Law Enforcement for state processing and the Federal Bureau of Investigations for federal processing. Potential School employees shall submit official court dispositions for criminal offenses of moral turpitude listed as part of their fingerprint results. The School agrees not to hire applicants whose fingerprint check results reveal noncompliance with standards of good moral character.

B. EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES

1. The School agrees that its employees will be required to abide by the guidelines set forth in Chapter 6B-1.001, Code ofEthics ofthe.Education Profession in Florida, and Chapter 6B-1.006, Principles of Professional Conduct for the Education Profession in Florida.

2. The Sponsor agrees to allow the School's employees to participate in Sponsor's non-

economic recognition programs. This shall not include any school recognition dollars.

3. Training activities shall be made available to School employees and the School shall

pay all of the additional costs associated with such training activities at the same rates and reimbursement methodologies currently charged to the Sponsor.

4. The School's teachers may participate in training conducted by the Sponsor and the

Sponsor's teachers may participate in training conducted by the School. New


Page e142

U282M110023 0023

# U282M100015

teachers who are employed by the School may participate in the Sponsor's Growing Educators in 1v1anatee County Program (GEMS). In such event, the School shall pay the Sponsor for the Sponsor's actual costs of providing such Growing Educators in Manatee County Program (GEMS) to ·the School's teachers and vice versa, as applicable.

IX. MISCELLANEOUS

A. The Sponsor agrees to process and submit in a timely manner all documentation prepared

by and necessary for the School's competition for applicable grants or other monetary awards.

B. Neither party shall be in default of this Charter, if the performance of any or all of this

Charter is prevented, delayed, hindered or otherwise made impracticable or impossible by reason of any strike, flood, hurricane, riot, fire, explosion, war, act of God, sabotage or any other casualty or cause beyond either party's control, and which cannot be overcome by reasonable diligence and without unusual expense.

C. This Charter is made and entered into in the State of Florida and shall be interpreted

according to the laws of Florida, and any inconsistent or contrary provisions in this Charter shall be preempted by the laws of Florida. School's approved Application to operate a charter school herein incorporated by reference as part of this Charter, and any inconsistent or contrary provision in the Application shall be preempted by this Charter. Manatee County shall be the proper venue for any litigation arising under this Charter.

D. This Charter shall constitute the full, entire, and complete agreement between the parties

hereto. All prior representations, understandings and agreements whether written or oral are superseded and replaced by this Charter. This Charter may be altered, changed, added to, deleted from or modified only through the voluntary, mutual consent of the parties. Any amendment to this Charter shall require approval of the School Board.

E. This Charter shall not be assigned by either party. The School may, without the consent

of the Sponsor, enter into Charters for services with an individual or group of individuals organized as a partnership or cooperative so long as the School remains ultimately responsible for said services as set forth in this Charter.

F. No waiver of any provision of this Charter shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of

any other provision unless expressly stated. The failure of either party to insist in any one or more instances upon the strict performance of any one or more of the provisions of this Charter shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of said term or provision, and the same shall continue in full force at""1d effect. No waiver or relinquishment to any provision of this Charter shall be deemed to have been made by either party unless in writing and signed by the parties.

G. In the case that this Charter School Charter must be terminated, the goal of the School

and the Sponsor should be to provide a smooth and seamless transition for students from


Page e143

U282M110023 0023


h

·----·-···-----·------ ----- ------ ---- - - -------- --------- ----··-···-··· ---- - ----- --------- ------------··---·-- -- ----···--. -·-·-·····----···-- ----- ·------- --- --···--- ----- .• ------ - ·---·

the Charter School to the assigned public school. Non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this Charter shall constitute a material breach of Charter,

H. This Charter is not intended to create any rights of a third party beneficiary. This clause

shall not be construed, however, as a waiver of any right possessed by a member of the corrununity, a stu.dent or parent/guardian of a student of the School.

I. Every notice, approval, consent or other communication authorized or required by this

Charter shall not be effective unless same shall be in writing and sent postage prepaid by United States·mail, directed to the other party at its address hereinafter provided or such other address as either party may designate by notice from time to time in accordance herewith:·

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY

SCHOOL CONTACT Robert H. Crosby President, RMA, FL, Inc. 27 Congress St., #310 Salem, MA 01970

SCHOOL CONTACT Krista Morton Director 6210 171 Ave. W Bradenton, Fl. 34208

Copies of all Notices to:

The School Board of Manatee County, Florida 215 Manatee Avenue West Bradenton, FL 34205 ATTN: Supervisor, Innovative Programs and Parental Options

J. The headings in the Charter are for convenience and reference only and in no way define,

limit or describe the scope of the Charter and shaH not be considered in the interpretation of the Charter or any provision hereof.

K. This Charter may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an

original, but all of which together shall constitute one Charter.

L. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Charter and any Appendix, this Charter shall prevail.



Page e144

U282M110023 0023


IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have cau.sed this thirty-four (34) page Charter to be executed by their undersigned officials as duly authorized.

SCHOOL BOARD OF MANATEE COUNTY RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY 1""-T.' T.'IT ..n.nTA T T£"1 ;J/1.,./.,. DTf"'IUAnn UJ.1 J.1.LJV n..i..l.Jf.t'l.' .1.1.,'-'•' U/1.11 a .L'-A.'->'.A..&..cYL.L'-LI"

MILBURN ACADEMY-MANATEE

APPROVED AS TO F

(l/'l

Date

I

1:..------ IL---'------ u/



Page e145

U282M110023 0023


AMENDMENT TO RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY OF FLORIDA, INC.,

CONTRACT

Come now the parties, the School Board of Lee County, Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "Sponsor" and Richard Milburn Academy of Florida, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the "School" and agree to amend the Charter School renewal contract entered into on June 20, 2006 to operate a charter school named Richard Milburn Academy, as follows:

The following sentence shall be added to the end of Paragraph 2.6.

The School, at its discretion, may enroll students who have been expelled from

attendance at Lee County Public Schools by action of the Lee County School Board and have been assigned to the school's Expulsion Diversion Program pursuant to School Board Policy 4.04.

All other terms of the contract will remain in full force and effect.

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY OF FLORIDA, INC.


Page e146

U282M110023 0023


ARTICLE 1.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are

incorporated herein by reference.

1.2. Application. The School's October 1, 2000 application, and any

amendments thereto, to operate a charter school named Richard

Milburn Academy, which was approved for operation as a school

serving students in grades 9- 12, is appended hereto as

Attachment 1 and is incorporated herein by reference. If any

provision of this Charter is inconsistent with Attachment 1, the

provision of this Charter shall prevail.

1.3. Term:

1.3.1. Effective Date: This Renewal Charter shall become effective

upon the signing by both parties and shall cover a term of five

(5) years commencing on July 1, 2006 and ending on June 30,

2011, except as otherwise provided in this Renewal Charter.

1.3.2. Instructional Calendar: The School's instructional calendar

shall be consistent with that of the Sponsor's public school

instructional calendar for each year of this charter. The

School shall be permitted to provide instruction on additional

days, but acknowledges it will not make claim for nor receive

funding for such days from the Sponsor.

5


Page e147

U282M110023 0023


AMENDMENT TO LEE ALTERNATIVE CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL

CONTRACT

Come now the parties, the School Board of Lee County, Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "Sponsor" and Richard Milburn Academy of Florida, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the "School" and agree to amend the Charter School renewal contract entered into on June 20, 2006 to operate a charter school named Lee Alternative Charter High School, as follows:

The following sentence shall be added to the end of Paragraph 2.6.

The School, at its discretion, may enroll students who have been expelled from

attendance at Lee County Public Schools by action of the Lee County School Board and have been assigned to the school's Expulsion Diversion Program pursuant to School Board Policy 4.04.

All other terms of the contract will remain in full force and effect.

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY F FLORIDA, INC.

APPROVED

JUN 1 7 2008 SCHOOL BOP.;tu iJl:.

LEE COUNTY


Page e148

U282M110023 0023


- '-

j Let Alternative Charter High Scnool

APPRO\If.!' AGREEMENT WITH THE LEE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD , 006

JUN \7 t..u

For the 2008-2009 School Year SC\-\OOL SO"RO Of LEE COUN1'l

THIS AGREEMENT is between Richard Milburn Academy of Florida, Inc. for Lee Alternative Charter High School hereinafter referred to as the "Charter School" and the School Board of Lee County, hereinafter referred to as the "District."

WITNESS:

WHEREAS, the parties agree to provide services in accordance with the conditions specified below.

TERM OF AGREEMENT: This agreement is effective from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009. The agreement will automatically renew for consecutive one -year terms unless written notice is provided to the Chief Executive Officer of the other party of the desire not to renew the agreement at least 60 days before an anniversary date.

The Charter School agrees the District and the Florida Department of Education may review any and all professional development delivered or approved by District staff and managed on the District's professional development database system in order to ensure alignment with the Florida Professional Development System Protocol Standards.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

The Charter School agrees to pay a proportionate share based on un-weighted FTE of the amount that the District pays for the Staff Development budget (Location 9150) (projected per UFTE cost is $16.15 per UFTE) in order for the Charter School to be eligible for the following services:

• The Charter School's name will be added to the school list drop down menu on the District PDMS Account

Set-up Page, allowing for both school and employee in-service registration.

• Charter School employees may register for Curriculum and Staff Development Center (CSDC) courses via the Professional Development Management System (PDMS) on the District website at http://\VvV\v.leeschools.net/dept/cun/\velconle.htin. There will be no charge for these courses.

• Charter School employees will be on the same priority status for most workshop seats as District employees.

Currently priority seating is given in a "first-registered, first-confirmed" basis, as well as meeting the advertised requiren;ents for the class.

• Charter School must appoint a school Site In-service Representative (SIR) who will have access to in-service

registration functions for that location's in-service activities on the Professional Development Management System, which will provide in-service credit for those activities to attending Charter School participants.

• Official employee tracking of in-service credit NOT provided for by the School District of Lee County is the

responsibility of the Charter School. Upon official request from the Principal with a list of Charter School employee names and Social Security numbers, CSDC will provide an unofficial transcript for each employee.


Page e149

U282M110023 0023


, ,. ". i

This transcript will only contain ..Jlstrict and school-based courses taken by the individual. Individual Charter School employees may also obtain this information using the request form provided on the CSDC website.

Other Important Information

• This plan applies only to staff development center courses, which use yearly Federal, State and/or District

funding to cover the cost of trainers/materials. Charter School employees may not be eligible to participate in certain specially-funded grant programs and other programs with funding sources which are intended for use by LCSD employees only.

• The costs of stipends and substitutes are the responsibilities of the Charter School.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on Date.

The Lee County School Board

Richard Milburn Academy of Florida, Inc.

APPROVED

JUN 1 7 2008 SCHOOL BOP-k0 OF

LEE COUNTY


Page e150

U282M110023 0023


THE SCHOOL BOARD OF VOLUSIA COill TY, FLORIDA CHARTER FOR THE RICHARD MILBURN SCHOOL OF

VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

This is a contract (also referred to as "charter") made and entered into in duplicate this 24th day

of February, 2009, by and between THE SCHOOL BOARD OF VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, a

political subdivision of the State of Florida and a body corporate pursuant to section 1001.40, F.S.,

hereinafter referred to as the "Sponsor" or the "District", and the RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY OF

FLORIDA, INC., a Florida not for profit corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida,

hereinafter referred to as the "School" or "RMA".

This charter for the operation and maintenance of a Florida public charter school is granted by the

Sponsor to the School for the maintenance and operation of a Florida public charter school in Volusia

County, Florida, to be known as the Richard Milburn Academy West. The School is a unit of the School

District of Volusia County, Florida, and shall be subject to the supervisory jurisdiction of the Sponsor and

accountable to the Sponsor for performance, to the extent provided by law. The School is a Florida public

school and shall be subject to the laws of Florida, including but not limited to all applicable laws

regarding health, safety and civil rights requirements, and all rules of the State Board of Education, but in

regard to Sponsor policies, only the policies referred to in this charter. The School shall also adhere to all

legal requirements under federal laws and regulations. The School shall be primarily responsible for

ensuring compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, rules and policies, and will indemnify and hold

the Sponsor harmless for any failure to comply with any applicable law, regulation, rule or policy. The

School's application, which was submitted to the Sponsor on August 1, 2008, is incorporated by reference

in this charter. If any provision of this charter is inconsistent with the application, the provision of this

charter shall prevail.

Pursuant to section 1002.33, Fla. Stat., as same shall be amended from time to time, applicable

rules and regulations of the State Board of Education, and applicable policies of the Sponsor, this charter

school shall provide a non-traditional educational program for at-risk students to earn high school

diplomas and to gain employment experience.

I. General Provisions

A. School Mission

The mission of the School is to motivate and challenge at-risk adolescents to achieve

academic excellence, employment success, and social responsibility by providing non-traditional

experiential learning opportunities in which students develop self-confidence, self-worth, self-

discipline, and self-acceptance. The primary purpose of the School is to attract and motivate at-

risk students to attend school regularly; to achieve measurable improvement in academic skills; to


Page e151

U282M110023 0023


increase employability skills; to refine social and life skills; to earn a high school diploma; to

become responsible community members; and to achieve employment success. The School

operates as a charter high school that provides alternative education for students in Volusia

County who choose to attend.

B. Enrollment Capacity/Limits

The anticipated population to be served by the School is at-risk students age thirteen (13)

through twenty (20) in grades nine (9) through twelve, (12). The School will serve no more than

300 students. The School shall demonstrate to the District that it has at least eighty (80) students

enrolled by July 31, 2009. If the School has not enrolled eighty (80) students and documented

such enrollment to the District by that date, then the first year of this charter shall be solely for

planning and development, and the School shall not enroll any students or receive any funding

from the District for the 2009-2010 school year, with the opening of the School being deferred

until the 2010-2011 school year. In such case, any FTE funding advanced by the District to the

School shall be refunded. Should the School open for the 2009-2010 school year, then the School

pledges to take all necessary steps and all necessary funding to operate the School for the 2009-

2010 school year. Notwithstanding these stated enrollment standards, the maximum number of

students to be served by the School in any year shall not exceed the recommended capacity of

satisfactory classroom space as set forth in the State Requirements for Educational Facilities and

those limits established by the applicable jurisdiction.

II. Academic Design

A. Curriculum Focus/Educational Program

(1) A Personal Education Plan (PEP) shall be developed for each student. Each

student shall be provided challenging academic and vocational instruction to meet their

individual needs as presented in their PEP. Teachers shall be provided up-dated

curriculum materials and on-going staff development opportunities to ensure that state-

of-the-art curriculum and instruction will be delivered in each classroom at the School.

The School shall use the curriculum utilized by the Sponsor, with all curriculum being

correlated with the Sunshine State Standards. This will also include adoption of the same

textbooks. The curriculum will be modified as appropriate to meet any changes in, or

successors to those standards, and shall meet or exceed any of the Sponsor's benchmarks.

Should amendments to state law require changes in the curriculum, such changes will be

implemented. The School shall designate an individual to serve as a contact person for

the Sponsor's curriculum department. The School's comprehensive curriculum includes

vocational programming that consists of a "Transition to Work" elective course


Page e152

U282M110023 0023

33


provision of this charter invalid or contrary to law in effect after such amendment, then the parties

agree that they will meet to discuss an amendment to this charter to rectify the conflict. If the

parties are unable to agree to an amendment, then, within thirty (30) days of written notice by either

party that the agreement to a requested amendment cannot be reached, the parties will submit to the

dispute resolution process as set forth in this charter.

K. Notices: Where written notice is required by this charter, it shall be directed to the other

party at the address hereinafter provided, or to such other address as either party may designate by

notice from time to time in accordance herewith, and to the attention of the individual designated by

the Superintendent of Schools for the District, and to the Principal for the School:

President Richard Milburn Academy of Florida, Inc.

The School Board of Volusia County Attention: Designee

L. Legal Representation: The parties acknowledge that each has been represented by legal

counsel in connection with the negotiation and execution of this charter and each is satisfied with

the legal advice and representation received.

M. Authorization: Each of the persons executing this charter has the full power and authority

to execute the charter on behalf of the party for whom he or she signs.

N. Counterparts: This charter may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which

shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one charter contract.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Contract as of the day and year

first above written.

BY: Robert H. Crosby, President of RMA of Florida, In .


Page e153

U282M110023 0023


THE SCHOOL BOARD OF VOLUSIA COUNTY

BY:

ATTEST:

D

Diane J. Smith, ChaiTlll£theBoarci


Page e154

U282M110023 0023


THE SCHOOL BOARD OF VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA CHARTER FOR THE RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY OF

VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

This is a contract (also referred to as "charter") made and entered into in duplicate this 25th day of

March, 2008, by and between THE SCHOOL BOARD OF VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political

subdivision of the State of Florida and a body corporate pursuant to section 1001.40, F.S., hereinafter

referred to as the "Sponsor", and the RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY, a Florida not for profit

corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "School" or

"RMA".

This charter for the operation and maintenance of a Florida public charter school is granted by the

Sponsor to the School for the maintenance and operation of a Florida public charter school in Volusia

County, Florida, to be known as the Richard Milburn Academy. The School is a unit of the School

District of Volusia County, Florida, and shall be subject to the supervisory jurisdiction of the Sponsor and .

accountable to the Sponsor f :>r performance, as provided by law. The School is a Florida public school

and shall be subject to the laws of Florida, including but not limited to all applicable laws regarding

health, safety and civil rights requirements, all rules of the State Board of Education, and the policies of

the Sponsor, unless otherwise exempted by law. The School shall also adhere to all legal requirements

under federal laws and regulations. The School shall be primarily responsible for ensuring compliance

with all applicable laws, regulations, rules and policies, and will indemnify and hold the Sponsor

harmless for any failure to comply with any applicable law, regulation, rule or policy. The School's

application, which was approved by the Sponsor on December 26, 2002, is incorporated by reference as

Appendix I. If any provision of this charter is inconsistent with Appendix I, the provision of this charter

shall prevail.

Pursuant to· Section 1002.33, Fla. Stat., as same shall be amended from time to time, applicable

rules and regulations of the State Board of Education, and applicable policies of the Sponsor, this charter

school shall provide a non-traditional educational program for at-risk students to earn high school

diplomas and to gain employment experience. The School shall be open to students age 13 through 20 in

grades 9 through 12.

I. General Provisions

A. School Mission

The mission of the School is to motivate and challenge at-risk adolescents to achieve

academic excellence, employment success, and social responsibility by providing non-traditional

experiential learning opportunities in which students develop self-confidence, self-worth, self-

discipline, and self-acceptance. The primary purpose of the School is to attract and motivate at-


Page e155

U282M110023 0023

20


the Board of Directors are entitled to vote on the business and affairs of the School. The Board of

Directors shall annually adopt and maintain an operating budget.

D. The School will submit the names, addresses and resumes of each member of the Board of

Directors to the Sponsor. Members of the Board of Directors of the School shall be fingerprinted in

the manner provided for in section 1012.32, Fla. Stat.

E. The Board of Directors will meet every other month on the second Tuesday. The specific

duties of the Board of Directors include electing the officers of the board, reviewing and approving

the annual budget, approval of policies such as personnel policies, student code of conduct and

disciplinary policy, etc., hiring staff and administrative oversight.

F. The School Director shall oversee the daily functions of the School. All staff will report to

the School Director who will report to the Board of Directors.

G. Parental involvement will occur on both a formal and informal basis. Parents shall have

opportunities for informal dialogue with members of the Board of Directors, the School Director of

the School, and members of the School staff.

H. All records of the School, except student records and other information specifically

excepted by law, shall be maintained as public records subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Fla.

Stat.

I. All meeting of the School's Board of Directors shall comply with the state's Sunshine Law,

as such is set out in Chapter 286, Fla. Stat.

XII. Term

A. EffectiveDate

This contract shall become effective on July 1, 2008, or upon signing by both parties,

whichever date is later and shall remain in effect through and including June 30, 2013.

B. RenewaVferndnation

(1) This charter may be terminated or non-renewed as provided for by sections

1002.33(7)(a)11, 1002.33(7)(a)12 and 1002.33(8), Fla. Stat., as same may from time to time be

amended.

(2) This contract may be renewed upon request of the School in increments of five (5)

years by mutual agreement of both parties.

(3) This contract may be modified during its initial term or any renewal term upon the

approval of both parties to the contract and such modification shall be in writing and executed by

the parties.

(4) If the charter is not renewed or is terminated, the School shall be dissolved under

the provisions of the law under which the School was organized, and any unencumbered public


Page e156

U282M110023 0023

25


disciplinary records as would commonly be available to a public school in Volusia County and in

accordance with law.

(4) The School will comply with the requirements of section 1003.54, Fla. Stat. in regard to

procedures involving parent notification, documentation of eligibility, and retention of records. The

School will also participate in the Sponsor's compliance monitoring for dropout prevention

programs.

XIX. Severability

If any word, phrase, sentence, paragraph or provision of this charter shall be deemed illegal or void

as against public policy, same shall not operate to invalidate the whole if same may be deleted without

impairing the validity or intent of the whole agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Contract as of the day and year

first above written.

BY: fthairman of the Board of Directors Director

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF VOLUSIA COUNTY

BY: Ju th G. Conte, Chamnan of the Board

ATIEST: Margkt A. SIJi'th, D.Ed., Superintendent of Schools


Page e157

U282M110023 0023


TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY ':"k

1701 North Congress Ave.* Austin, Texas 78701-1494 512/463-9734 *FAX: 512/463-9838 * http://www.tea.state.tx.us

Charter Renewal

January 4, 2008

Mr. William P. Gayton, Chair Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. 1818 Eagle Meadow San Antonio, Tx 78248

Re: Charter Renewal for Richard Milburn Academy (Amarillo) (CON 188801)

Dear Mr. William P. Gayton:

I am pleased to inform you that the charter renewal is approved for Richard Milburn Academy (Amarillo) with a contract ending date of July 31. 2015. After renewal, the charter contract shall consist of the following:

• the representations and assurances made by the charter holder in the original request

for application under the standard application system;

• the original contract for charter, as signed by the charter holder and the State Board of Education;

• any condition, amendment, modification, revtston, or other change to the charter

approved by the State Board of Education or the commissioner of education;

• the final renewal application, on file with the Division of Charter Schools, including any revisions required by the agency and any amendments to the charter made through the renewal application; and

• all statements, assurances, commitments and representations made by the charter

holder in its application for charter renewal and its attachments or related documents, to the extent that these documents are consistent with those listed above.

Note that this contract is contingent upon legislative authorization and that the contract and the funding under state and federal law may be modified or even terminated by future legislative act. Furthermore, state and federal laws and rules may periodically be adopted, amended, or repealed and all such changes applicable to the charter holder or its charter school(s) may modify this contract, as of the effective date provided in the law or rule. Nothing in this contract shall be construed to entitle the charter holder to any privilege or benefit, including any funding, but in accordance with state and federal laws in effect and as they may in the future be amended. A contract term that conflicts with any state or federal law or rule is superseded by the law or rule to the extent that the law or rule conflicts with the contract term.


Page e158

U282M110023 0023


of the contract shall remain in full force and effect, so as to give effect to the intent of the parties to the extent valid and enforceable.

42. Conditions of Contract. Execution of this contract by the Board is

conditioned on full and timely compliance by Charterholder with: (a) the terms, required assurances and conditions of Request for Application #701-00-006; (b) applicable law; and (c) all commitments and representations made in Charterhoider's application and any supporting documents (to the extent such commitments and representations are consistent with the terms of this contract).

43. No Waiver of Breach. No assent, express or implied, to any breach of

any of the covenants or agreements herein shall waive any succeeding or other breach.

44. Venue. Any suit arising under this contract shall be brought in Travis

County, Texas.

45. Governing Law. In any suit arising under this contract, Texas law shall apply.

46. Authority. By executing this contract, Charterholder represents that it is

an "eligible entity" within the meaning of Section 12.101 (a), TEC. Charterholder shall immediately notify the Board of any legal change in its status, which would disqualify it from holding the charter, of any violation of the terms and conditions of this contract, or of any change in the chief operating officer of the Charterholder. Charterholder further represents that the person signing this contract has been properly delegated authority to do so.

1signature/date) Chief Operating Officer, Ch

Robert H. Crosby

(Printed Name)

8


Page e159

U282M110023 0023


TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1701 North Congress Ave.*Austin, Texas 78701-1494 * 512/463-9734 * FAX: 512/463-9838 * http://www.tea.state.tx.us

Shirley J. Neeley, Ed.D. Commissioner

June 16, 2004

Mr. Peter Briggs, Board Chair Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. 27 Congress Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970

Dear Mr. Briggs:

I am pleased to inform you that the charter renewal for Richard Milburn Alternative High School,

_9orpus Christi (county-district number 178-804) is approved for a term of ten years with a contract ending date of July 31, 2013. After renewal, the contract for charter shall consist of the following elements:

• the representations and assurances made by the charter holder in the original request for

application under the standard application system;


• any condition, amendment, modification, revision, or other change to the charter approved by

the State Board of Education or the commissioner of education;

• the final renewal application, on file with the Division of Chf.rter Schools, including any revisions required by the agency and any amendments to the charter made via the renewal application, except any responses in the following sections (not all applications contain each section listed), including relevant attachments: Code of Conduct; Evaluation of Student Performance; Student Performance Goals; Plans and Initiatives to Improve Student Performance; Monitoring Follow-Up; IDEA Key Components; and Information Request, Subsections D and E; and

• all statements, assurances, commitments and representations made by the charter holder in

its application for charter renewal and its attachments or related documents, to the extent that these documents are consistent with those listed above.

Note that a contract term that conflicts with any state or federal law or rule is superseded by the law or rule to the extent that the law or rule conflicts with the contract term. By continuing to operate past the ending date of the original charter, the charter holder indicates its agreement to the contract for charter as described above.

Please know that the efforts of those who have contributed to the school's successes are appreciated. I look forward to hearing of the school's accomplishments in its new term. Contact Mary Perry in the Division of Charter Schools at (512) 463-9575 with any questions.

Peter G.Br1ggs CAROLE RENALErl P es ident.

{W NOTARY PUBLIC R1 chard M1lburn Academy COMMONWEALTH CF MASSACHUSETIS

"Good, Bett tM flllMf @Nrii:P-H F.tS!o t 12d is better-and your better is BEST!"


Page e160

U282M110023 0023


FROM RMA-REG S_OFFC PHONE NO. 8305575424 -. Sep. 04 2002 04:41PM P2

TEXAS Enuc.Arr'ION AGENcy· Jirn Nelson

Gvmmbsi•>llr v ( ErJucmion

NOTtF'lCATION OF, STATE 'HOARD OF EDUCATlON ACTION

TO:

FROIVI:

Ml". Non11ar1 Hall Richard MilbUln Ac:ademy

br. Susan Bam Managing Directt)r Charter Schools D.ivision

RE: Nlay 2001 State Board ofEducatlon Action

DATE: May 2:3, 2001

At the regulaJ.· eeting of the State Board of Education on May 10,2001, the following requested a1nendn1e11ts were approved: to expand the geographic boundary of1U£4J ·.ci Milburn Amariio to include Canyon Independeut School .District (ISD); ro inc.h.Kie-· "

·"Co!'.Pcna.s cove·fD in the geographic boundary ofRit hard Milbl.tm I<illeen; to change tha l'l'lake..up of the five representatives on the governing boards; to change the aveTage <laily attendance rate goal :fron1 90o/o to 80% at Richard Milburn Corpus Christi, Kille.en) L tbbocle; Midl d, An1_a_d. and Beaun1ont; and to have quarterly :rather than monthly schoolll'laJ.1agement board. n1eetings.

Approval for any new o1·relocated. site OI' sites is co1'1tingent upon the locatio11 of the site/s withill the approved geographic boundaries of your charter. In addition, the Charter Schools Division mus't receive a certificate of occupan.cy for the site/s ifreqtiired by lot;al regulations. Please send the ce11i:fic te to the attention ofK.irste.n Christoph rse11, Charter Schools Division, \.Vhen it is 1nade available to you.

Plc::ase feel free to call (512) 463-9575 if you have questions. The agency staiilooks f{)t-ward to woTking with you.

.Preparing Children, Pr01n.otin.g Excellence


Page e161

U282M110023 0023


Jim Nelson Commissioner of Education

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY I 70 I North Congress Ave.* Austin, Texas 78701- I494 * 5 I 2/463-9734 * FAX: 5 I 2/463-9838 * http://www.tea.state.tx.us

AMENDMENT NOTIFICATION

TO:

FROM:

Dr. Norman Hall Richard Milburn Academy 1263 Terminal Loop McQueeney, TX 78123 Susan Barnes, Managing Director cjJ Charter Schools

DATE: November 6, 2000

RE: Charter Amendment

The State Board of Education at its regularly scheduled meeting on November 3, 2000, deliberated on the amendment(s) submitted by your charter school with the following results:

The Board approved amendments for Richard Milburn Academies to: • Change Amarillo and Beaumont opening to January 2001. • Corpus Christi, Midland, Lubbock and Killen-

1. Allow for hiring uncertified, degreed teachers with 0-5 years' experience and director with master's degrees and 5 years' experience,

2. Allow a work study and college work component with high school coursework requirements; and

3. AJd transition to work programs through relationships with local community colleges and using community resources.


Page e162

U282M110023 0023

# U282M100015

CONTRACT FOR CHARTER Fl LE This contract is executed the 15 day of June 1998 between the Texas State Board of Education (the "Board) and·Richard Milburn Alternative ffigh School - Cornus Christi ("Charterholder") for an open-enrollment charter to operate a Texas public school.

General

1. Definitions. As used in this contract: "Charter" means the open-enrollment charter, as provided by Subchapter D, Chapter 12, Texas Education Code (TEC), granted by this contract. "Charter school" means the open-enrollment charter school. Charterholder agrees to operate as provided in this contract. The charter school is a Texas public school. "Agency" means the Texas Education Agency.

2. The Charter. This contract grants to Charterholder an open-enrollment

charter under Subchapter D, Chapter 12, TEC. The terms of the charter include: (a) this contract; (b) applicable law; (c) Request for Application #701-97-028; (d) any condition, amendment, modification, revision or

. other change to the charter adopted or ratified by the Board and (e) all statements, assurances, commitments and representations made by Charterholder in its application for charter, attachments or related documents, to the extent consistent with (a) through (d).

3. Authority Granted by Charter. The charter authorizes Charterholder to

operate a charter school subject to the terms of the charter. Action inconsistent with the terms of the charter shall constitute a material violation of the charter.

4. Alienation of Charter. The charter may not be assigned, encumbered,

pledged or in any way alienated for the benefit of creditors or otherwise. Charterholder may not delegate, assign, subcontract or otherwise alienate any of its rights or responsibilities under the charter. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void and of no force or effect; provided, however, that Charterholder may contract at fair market value for services necessary to carry out policies adopted by Charterholder or the governing body of the charter school.

···-·· ,· ·· · --

5. Term of Charter. The charter shall be in effect from August 1, 1998

through July 31, 2003, unless renewed or terminated.

6. Renewal of Charter. On timely application by Charterholder in a manner prescribed by the Board, the charter may be renewed for an additional period determined by the Board. The charter may be renewed only by


Page e163

U282M110023 0023

# U282M100015

written amendment approved by vote of the Board and properly executed by its chair.

7. Revision bv Aareement. The terms of the charter may be revised with the

consent of Charterholder by written amendment approved by vote of the Board. The commissioner of education ("the commissioner") may revise the charter on a provisional basis during an interim between Board meetings; however, such action shall expire unless ratified by the Board at its next regular meeting. Nothing in this paragraph limits the authority of the Board or the commissioner to act in accordance with other provisions of this contract.

Students

8. Ooen Enrollment. Admission and enrollment of students shall be open to any person who resides within the geographic boundaries stated in the charter and who is eligible for admission based on lawful criteria identified in the charter. Total enrollment shall not exceed 300 students. The charter school's admission policy shall prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, national origin, ethnicity, religion, disability, academic or athletic ability, or the district the student would otherwise attend. Students who reside outside the ·geographic boundaries stated in the charter shall not be admitted to the charter school until all eligible applicants who reside within the boundaries have been enrolled.

9. Public Education Grant Students. Charterholder shall adopt an express

policy providing for the admission of, and shall admit under such policy, students eligible for a public education grant under Subchapter G, Chapter 29, TEC. .

10. Non-discrimination. The educational program of the charter school shall

be nonsectarian, ang shall not discriminate against any student or employee on the basrs· of race, creed, sex, national origin, religion, disability or need for special education services.

11. Children with Disabilities. The charter school is a "local educational

agency" as defined by federal law. Charterholder must comply with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. §1401, et seq., and implementing regulations; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ("Section 504"), 29 U.S.C.§794, and implementing regulations; Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §12131-12165, and implementing regulations; Chapter 29, TEC, and implementing rules; and the many court cases applying these laws. For example:

(a) Child Find. Charterholder must adopt and implement policies and

practices that affirmatively seek out, identify, locate, and evaluate children with disabilities enrolled in the charter school or contacting the charter school regarding enrollment, and must develop and implement a practical


Page e164

U282M110023 0023

# U282M100015

method · to determine which children with disabilities are currently receiving needed special education and related services. For each eligible child, Charterholder must develop and offer an individualized education plan appropriate to the needs of that student.

(b) Free Appropriate Public Education. Charterholder must provide a free

appropriate public education to all children with disabilities otherwise eligible to enroll in the charter school. If the program, staff or facilities of the charter school are not capable of meeting the needs of a particular child, Charterholder must implement changes necessary to accommodate the child at the charter school. If reasonable accommodations would be insufficient to enable the child to benefit from the charter school's program, Charterholder must, at its own expense, place the child at an appropriate school.

(c) Services to Expelled Students. Charterholder must continue to provide a

free appropriate public education to a child with disabilities even after expelling or suspending the child for valid disciplinary reasons. This obligation to serve the child continues until the end of the school year.

(d) Monitoring. The charter school's implementation of the laws governing

education of children with disabilities will be monitored for compliance by the United States Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs; the United States Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights; the Texas Education Agency; and others. This monitoring activity includes responding to complaints, random on-site inspections and other investigations by the enforcing agencies, and will result in corrective actions imposed on Charterholder by these agencies for all discrepancies found.

(e) Due Process Hearings. The charter school's implementation of the laws

governing education of children with disabilities will, in addition, be subject to court supervision via litigation against Charterholder brought by individuals affected by the actions of the charter school. The cost of this litigation can be substantial.

Notice: These are only a few of the charter school's legal responsibilities

in this area, included here for illustrative purposes only.

12. Student Performance and Accountability. Charterholder shall satisfy Subchapters 8, C, D, and G of Chapter 39 of the TEC, and related agency rules, as well as the student performance accountability criteria stated in its application for charter. Charterholder shall annually provide in a manner and form defined by the commissioner a ..written evaluation of the charter school's compliance with the statements, assurances, commitments and representations made by Charterholder in its

J application for a charter, attachments, and related documents.

13. Criminal Historv. Charterholder shall take prompt and appropriate measures if Charterholder or the charter school, or any of their employees or agents, obtains information that an employee or volunteer


Page e165

U282M110023 0023

# U282M100015

of the charter school has a reported criminal history that bears directly on the duties and responsibilities of the employee or volunteer at the school. Charterholder further represents that the Board and the agency shall be notified immediately of such information and the measures taken.

14. Reporting Child Abuse or Neglect. Charterholder shall adopt and

disseminate to all charter school staff and volunteers a policy governing child abuse reports required by Chapter 261, Texas Family Code. The policy shall state that no employee, volunteer or agent of Charterholder or the charter school can be required to report child abuse or neglect to Charterholder or the charter school. Rather, such reports must be made directly by the person suspecting child abuse or neglect to an appropriate entity listed in Chapter 261, Texas Family Code.

15. Notice to District. Charterholder shall notify the school district in which

the student resides within three business days of any action expelling or withdrawing a student from the charter school.

16. School Year. Charterholder shall adopt a school year with fixed

beginning and ending dates.

Financial Managment

17. Fiscal Year. Charterholder shall adopt a fiscal year beginning September 1 and ending August 31.

18. Financial Accounting. Charterholder shall comply fully with generally

accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") and the Financial Accountability System Resource Guide, Bulletin 679 or its successor ("Bulletin 679") published by the agency in the management and operation of the charter school.

19. Annual Audit. Charterholder shall at its own expense have the financial

and programmatic operations of the charter school audited annually by a certified public accountant holding a permit from the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy. Charterholder shall file a copy of the annual audit report, approved by Charterholder, with the agency not later than the 120th day after the end of the fiscal year for which the audit was made. The audit must comply with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and must include an audit of the accuracy of the fiscal information provided by the charter school through PEIMS. Financial statements in the audit must comply with Government Auditing Standards and the Office of Management and Budget Circular 133.

20. Attendance Accounting. To the extent required by the commissioner,

Charterholder shall comply with the "Student Attendance Accounting Handbook" published by the Agency; provided, however, that


Page e166

U282M110023 0023

# U282M100015

Charterholder shall report attendance data to the agency at six-week intervals or as directed by the agency.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

Foundation School Program. Funds distributed to the charter school under Section 12.106, TEC shall be calculated and distributed by the agency at six-week intervals. Distribution of funds to the charter school is contingent upon charterholder's compliance with the terms of the charter. Charterholder is ineligible to receive Foundation School Program funds prior to September 1, 1998. Within 30 days of receiving notice of overallocation and request for refund under Section 42.258, TEC, Charterholder shall transmit to the agency an amount equal to the requested refund. If Charterholder fails to make the requested refund, the agency may recover the overallocation by any means permitted by law, including but not limited to the process set forth in Section 42.258, TEC. Tuition and Fees. Charterholder shall not charge tuition and shall not charge a fee except that it may charge a fee listed in Subsection 11.158(a), TEC. Assets of Charter. Charterholder shall not apply, hold, credit, transfer or otherwise make use of funds, assets or resources of the charter school for any purpose other than operation of the charter school described in the charter. Indebtedness of Charter. Charterholder shall not incur a debt, secure an obligation, extend credit, or otherwise make use of the credit or assets of the charter school for any purpose other than operation of the charter school described in the charter. Interested Transactions. All financial transactions between the charter school and (a) Charterholder; (b}/an officer, director, or employee of Charterholder or of the charter school; or (c) a person or entity having partial or complete control over Charterholder or the charter school shall be separately and clearly reflected in the accounting, auditing, budgeting, reporting, and record keeping systems of the charter school. Charterholder shall not transfer any asset of the charter or incur any debt except in return for goods or services provided for the benefit of the charter school at fair market value.

26. Non-Charter Activities. Charterholder shall keep separate and distinct

accounting, auditing, budgeting, reporting, and record keeping systems for the management and operation of the charter school. Any business activities of Charterholder not directly related to the management and operation of the charter school shall be kept in separate and distinct accounting, auditing, budgeting, reporting, and record keeping systems from those reflecting activities under the charter. Any commingling of charter and non-charter business in these systems shall be a material violation of the charter. "


Page e167

U282M110023 0023

# U282M100015

Governance and Operations

27. Non-Profit Status. Charterholder shall take and refrain from all acts necessary to be and remain in good standing as an organization exempt from taxation under Section 501(c)(3), Internal Revenue Code. If Charterholder is incorporated, it shall in addition comply with all applicable laws governing its corporate status. Failure to comply with this paragraph is a material violation of the charter, and the Board may act on the violation even if the Internal Revenue Service, Secretary of State, or other body with jurisdiction has failed to act.

28. Records Retention and Management. Charterholder shall implement a

records management system that conforms to the system required of school districts under the Local Government Records Act, · Section 201.001 et seq., Local Government Code, and rules adopted thereunder; provided, however, that records subject to audit shall be retained and available for audit for a period of not less than five (5) years from the latter of the date of termination or renewal of the charter.

29. PEIMS Reporting. Charterholder shall report timely and accurate

information to the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS), as required by the commissioner.

30. Conflict of Interest. Charterholder shall comply with any applicable

prohibition, restriction or requirement relating to conflicts of interest. If an officer or board member of Charterholder or of the charter school has a substantial interest, within the meaning of Chapter 171, Local Government Code, in a transaction, such interest shall be disclosed in public session at a duly called meeting of the governing body prior to any action on the transaction.

31. Disclosure of Campaign Contributions. Charterholder shall adopt policies

that will ensure complt nce with the disclosure requirements of State Board of Education Operating Rule 4.3 or its successor.

32. Indemnification. Charterholder shall hold the Board and agency harmless

from and shall indemnify the Board and agency against any and all claims, demands, and causes of action of whatever kind or nature asserted by any third party and occurring or in any way incident to, arising out of, or in connection with wrongful acts of Charterholder, its agents, employees, and subcontractors.

33. Failure to Operate. Charterholder shall operate the charter school for the

full school term as described in the charter application in each year of the charter contract. Charterholder may not suspend operation for longer than 21 days without a revision to its charter, adopted by the Board, stating that the charter school is dormant and setting forth the date on which operations shall resume and any applicable conditions.


Page e168

U282M110023 0023

# U282M100015

Suspension of operations in violation of this paragraph shall constitute abandonment of this contract and of the charter.

34. Charter School Facility. Charterholder shall have and maintain

throughout the term of the charter a lease agreement, title or other legal instrument granting to Charterholder the right to occupy and use one or more facilities suitable for use as the charter school facilities described by the charter. During any period of dormancy granted by the Board, this requirement may be waived by the Board.

Enforcement

35. Agency Investigations. The commissioner may in his sound discretion direct the agency to conduct investigations of the charter school to determine compliance with the terms of the charter or as authorized in Sections 39.074 and 39.075, Subchapter D, Chapter 39, TEC or other law. Charterholder, its employees and agents shall fully cooperate with such investigations. Failure to timely comply with reasonable requests for access to sites, personnel, documents or things is a material violation of the charter.

36. Commissioner Authority. The commissioner in his sole discretion may

take anyaction authorized by Section 39.131, TEC or Chapter 29, TEC relating to the charter school. Such action is not "adverse action" as used in this contract. Charterholder, its employees and agents shall fully cooperate with such actions. Failure to timely comply with any action authorized by Section 39.131, TEC or Chapter 29, TEC is a material violation of the charter.

37. Adverse Action. The Board in its sole discretion may modify, place on

probation, revoke or deny timely renewal of the charter for cause ("adverse action"). Each of the following shall be cause for adverse action on the charter: (a) any material violation of the terms of the charter listed in paragraph 2; (b) failure to satisfy generally accepted accounting standards of fiscal management; or (c) failure to comply with an applicable law or rule.

This Agreement

38. Entire Agreement. This contract, including all referenced attachments and terms incorporated by reference, contains the entire agreement of the parties. All prior representations, understandings and discussions are merged into, superseded by and canceled by this contract.


Page e169

U282M110023 0023

# U282M100015

1. Conditions of Contract. Execution of this contract by the Board is

conditioned on full and timely compliance by Charterholder with: (a) the terms, required assurances and ·conditions of Request for Application #701-97-028; (b) applicable law; and (c) all commitments and representations made in Charterholder's application and any supporting documents (to the ·extent such commitments and representations are consistent with the terms of this contract).




County, Texas.



an "eligible entity" within the meaning of Section 12.101 (a), TEC. Charterholder shall immediately notify the Board of any legal change in its status which would disqualify it from holding the charter, of any violation of the terms and conditions of this contract, or of any change in the chief operating officer of the charter school or Charterholder. Charterholder further represents that the person signing this contract has been properly delegated authority to do so.

Entered into this _1...;;_5 day of June '1998.

Texas State Board of Education Charterholder

By D. ack Christie Chair an

Robert H. Crosby, resident Typed Name


Page e170

U282M110023 0023

# U282M100015

TEXAS EDUCATION. _r\_GENCY 1701 North Congress Ave.* Austin, Texas 78701-1494 * 512/463-9734 *FAX: 512/463-9838 *- http://www.tea.state.tx.us


June 16, 2004


Dear Mr. Briggs:

I am pleased to inform you that the charter renewal for Richard Milburn Alternative High School,

. Killeef (county-district number 014-801) is approved for a term of ten years with a contract ending aa eo July 31, 2013. After renewal, the contract for charter shall consist of the following elements:




• any condition, amendment,-modification, revision, or other change to the charter approved by


• the final renewal application, on file with the Division of Charter Schools, including any revisions required by the agency and any amendments to the charter made via the renewal application, except any responses in the following sections (nofall applications contain each section listed), including relevant attachments: Code _of Conduct; Evaluation of Student

· Performance; Student Performance Goals; Plans and · Initiatives to Improve Student Performance; Monitoring Follow-Up; IDEA Key Components; and Information Request, Subsections D and E; and



Note that a contract term that conflicts with any state orfederallaw or rule is superseded by the law or rule to the extent that the law or rule conflicts with the contract term. By continuing to operate past the ending date of the original charter, the charter holder indicates its agreement to the contract for charter as described above.

Please know that the efforts of those who have contributed to the school's successes are appreciated. I look fotward to hearing of the school's accomplishments in its new term. Contact Mary Perry in the Division of Charter Schools at (512) 463-95 ith any questions.

Shirley J. Nee , Ed.D. Commissioner of Education

·

Peter. G.Briggs President Richard Milburn Academy

,, ,· CAROLE RENALES NOTARY PUBLIC

,,f(J COMMON E ((Good, Better, Best-never let it rest-until your good is be ·-q_rnicY!!J:V!M rJ!' T{t B! 13SACHUSEITS

., .._..' L:r·.PIR!:S 05/03/2007


Page e171

U282M110023 0023


CONTRACT FOR CHARTER

This contract is executed the L5_ day of June 1998 between the Texas State Board of Education (the "Board} and Richard Milburn Alternative High School - Killeen ("Charterholder'') for an open-enrollment charter to operate a Texas public school.

General

1. Definitions. As used in this contract: "Charter'' means the open-enrollment charter, as provided by Subchapter D, Chapter 12, Texas Education Code (TEC), granted by this contract. "Charter school" means the open-enrollment charter school. Charterholder agrees to operate as provided in this contract. The charter school is a Texas public school. "Agency" means the Texas Education Agency.

2. The Charter. This contract grants to Charterholder an open-enrollment

charter under Subchapter D, Chapter 12, TEC. The terms of the charter include: (a) this contract; (b) applicable law; (c) Request for Application #701-97-028; (d) any condition, amendment, modification, revision or other change to the charter adopted or ratified by the Board and (e) all statements, assurances, commitments and representations made by Charterholder in its application for charter, attachments or related documents, to the extent consistent with (a) through (d).

3. Authority Granted by Charter. The charter authorizes Charterholder to

operate a charter school subject to the terms of the charter. Action inconsistent with the terms of the charter shall constitute a material violation of the charter.

4. . Alienation of Charter. The charter may not be assigned, encumbered,

pledged or in any way alienated for the benefit of creditors or otherwise. Charterholder may not delegate, assign, subcontract or otherwise alienate any of its rights or responsibilities under the charter. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void and of no force or effect; provided, however, that Charterholder may contract at fair market value for services necessary to carry out policies adopted by Charterholder or the governing body of the charter school.

5. · Term of Charter. The charter shall be in effect from August 1, 1998

through July 31, 2003, unless renewed or terminated.

6. Renewal of Charter. On timely application by Charterholder in a manner prescribed by the Board, the charter may be renewed for an additional period determined by the Board. The charter may be renewed only by


Page e172

U282M110023 0023


'' I

1. Conditions of Contract. Execution of this contract by the Board is conditioned on full and timely compliance by Charterholder with: (a) the terms, required assurances and conditions of Request for Application #701-97-028; (b) applicable law; and (c) all commitments and representations made in Charterhoider's application and any supporting documents (to the extent such commitments and representations are consistent with the terms of this contract).


any of the covenants or agreements herein shall waive any succeeding or other breach. ,


County, Texas.




Entered into this _1_5 day of June '1998.


Robert H. Crosby, Typed Name


Page e173

U282M110023 0023


Robert Scott Commissioner

December 5, 2008

TEXAS EDUCATION I 701 North Congress A\'c. k Austin, Tex.as 78701-1494 k 512/463-9734 * FAX:512/463-9838 k htt

William P. Gayton, Chair Richard Milburn Academy/Texas, Inc. 1263 Terminal Loop McQueeney, Texas 78123

Re: Renewal Status for Richard Milburn Academy (Fort Worth) (CON 220812)

Dear Mr. Gayton:

The charter renewal application for Richard Milburn Academy (Fort Worth} has been received by U1e Texas Education Agency. As stated in 19 Texas Administrative Code {TAC}§100.1031(a), if a charter holder makes timely and sufficient application for renewal of an open-enrollment charter, the existing open-enrollment charter does not expire until the commissioner of edwcation has finally granted or denied the application.

As authorized in Texas Education Code (TEC), §12.115, the commissioner may modify, place on probation, revoke or deny the renewal of the charter of an open-enrollment charter school if the commissioner determines that the charter holder: 1) committed a material violation of the charter; including failure to satisfy accountability provisions prescribed by the charter; 2) failed to satisfy generally accepted accounting standards of fiscal management; 3) failed to protect the health, safety, or welfare of the students enrolled at the school; or 4} failed to comply with the requirements of TEC, Chapter 12, Subchapter D or other applicable laws or rules. Rules at 19 TAC §100.1031 contain additional information about charter renewaL

The charter renewal process consists of reviews in the areas of accreditation status, student performance, business operations and fiscal management, data reporting, program effectiveness, and compliance. Before a renewat decision can be issued by the commissioner, the charter must receive clearance from the following areas: Accountability Ratings, Charter Schoo[ Administration, Child Nutrition, Fin mcial Audits. Grants Management, Legal Services, PEIMS Data Reporting, Program Monitoring and Interventions, IDEA Coordination, and Student Assessment. Our records show that your charter school is currently not cleared in the following areas:

• Accountability Ratings

Program Monitoring and Interventions

Please note that should additional areas of concern arise after the date of this letter, a!! areas will need to be clear before renewal is considered by the commissioner. Once all areas have been cleared and the commissioner has determined that renewal is appropriate, you wi[l be notified in writing that the renewal has been granted.


Page e174

U282M110023 0023


Please contact Kathryn Jones or Rick Salvo in the Division of Charter School Administration at (512) 463-9575 with any questions pertaining to the charter renewal process.

Sincerely,

"--/h f Mary Perry Director, Division of Charter Schoof Administration

cc: Norman Hall, Superintendent


Page e175

U282M110023 0023


Shirl,y J. Neeley, Ed.D. Commissioner

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1701 North Congress Ave.*Austin, Texas 78701-1494 *512/463-9734 * FAX: 512/463-9838 *http://www.tea.state.tx.us

February 16, 2007

William Gayton, Chair Richard Milburn Academy/Texas, Inc. 27 Congress Street Salem, MA 01970

Re: Charter Renewal for Richard Milburn Academy (Fort Worth)

Dear Mr. Gayton:

1 am pleased to inform you that the charter renewal is approved for Richard Milburn Academy (Fort Worth) with a contract ending·date of July 31, 2008. After renewal, the charter contract shall consist of the following:




o any condition, amendment, modification, revision, or other change to the· charter





Note that this contract is contingent upon legislative authorization and that the contract and the funding under it may be modified or even terminated by future legislative act. Furthermore, state and federal laws and rules may periodically be adopted, amended, or repealed and all such changes applicable to the charter holder or its charter school(s) may modify this contract, as of the effective date provided in the law or rule. ·Nothing in this contract shall be construed to entitle the charter holder to any privilege or benefit, including any funding, but in accordance with state and federal laws in effect and as they may in the future be amended. A contract term that conflicts with any state or federal law or rule is superseded by the law or rule to the extent that the law or rule conflicts with the contract term.


Page e176

U282M110023 0023


Chief Operating Officer of Richard Milburn Academy-Fort Worth:


Page e177

U282M110023 0023


TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1701 North Congress Ave.* Austin, Texas 78701-1494 * 512/463-9734 *FAX: 512/463-9838 * http://www.tea.state.tx.us

Charter Renewal

January 4, 2008

Mr. William P. Gayton, Chair Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. 1818 Eagle Meadow San Antonio, Tx 78248

Re: Charter Renewal for Richard Milburn Academy (Suburban Houston) (CON 101854)

Dear Mr. Wil!iam P. Gayton:

I am pleased to inform you that the charter renewal is approved for Richard Milburn Academy (Suburban Houston) with a contract ending date of July 31, 2015. After renewal, the charter contract shall consist of the following:




• any condition, amendment, modification, revts1on, or other change to the charter





Note that this contract is contingent upon legislative authorization and that the contract and the funding under state and federal law may be modified or even terminated by future legislative act. Furthermore, state and federal laws and rules may periodically be adopted, amended, or repealed and all such changes applicable to the charter holder or its charter school(s) may modify this contract, as of the effective date provided in the law or rule. Nothing in this contract shall be construed to entitle the charter holder to any privilege or benefit, including any funding, but in accordance with state and federal laws in effect and as they may in the future be amended. A contract term that conflicts with any state or federal law or rule is superseded by the law or rule to the extent that the law or rule conflicts with the contract term.


Page e178

U282M110023 0023

Mr. William P. Gayton, Chair Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. Page 2

To acknowledge acceptance of this renewed contract, the chair of the charter holder board must sign below and return the entire original document to:

Texas Education Agency

Division of Charter Schools William B. Travis Building, Room 5..107

1701 North Congress Avenue Austin, Texas 78701-1494

The charter holder should keep a copy of the document for its files. Please contact the Division of Charter Schools at (512) 463-9575 with any questions.

Sincerely,

Robert Scott Commissioner of Education

cc: Dr. Norman Hall, Superintendent

rs

I the undersigned hereby certify that the governing body of the charter holder has accepted and agreed to the charter renewal agreement for Richard Milburn Academy (Suburban Houston) as outlined in the foregoing letter and has authorized me tq sign below.

Agreed and Accepted:

/ ,.

.. /·.-,rj/../ )1/P . jftt'-'J J;,J/J I 2?'-.J.f(

Mr. William P. Gaitan Date Chair, Richard Mllbuin Academy, inc.

PR/Award # U282M100015 e72


Page e179

U282M110023 0023


Shidy J. Neeley, Ed.D. • =ommissioner

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1701 North Congress Ave.*Austin, Texas 78701-1494 *512/463-9734* FAX: 512/463-9838 *http://www.tea.state.tx.us

February 16, 2007

William Gayton; Chair Richard Milburn Academy/Texas, Inc. 27 Congress Street · Salem, MA 01970

Re: Charter Renewal for Richard Milburn Academy {Suburban Houston)

Dear Mr. Gayton:

I am pleased to inform you that the charter renewal is approved for Richard Milburn Academy (Suburban Houston) with a contract ending date of July 31. 2008. After renewal, the charter contract shall consist of the following:

" the representations and assurances made by the charter holder in the original request



o any condition, amendment, modification, revision, or other change to the charter


e the final renewal application, on file with the Division of Charter Schools, including any revisions required by the agency and any amendments to the charter made through the renewal application; and



Note that this contract is contingent upon legislative authorization and that the contract and the funding under it may be modified or even terminated by future legislative act. Furthermore, state and federal laws and rules may periodically be adopted, amended, or repealed and all such changes applicable to the charter holder or its charter school(s) may modify this contract, as of the effective date provided in the law or rule. Nothing in this contract shall be construed to entitle the charter holder to any privilege or benefit, including any funding, but in accordance with state and federal laws in effect and as they may in the future be amended. A contract term that conflicts with any state or federal law or rule is superseded by the law or rule to the extent that the law or rule conflicts with the contract term.


Page e180

U282M110023 0023


i

1,.

Chief Operating Officer of Richard Milburn Academy-Suburban Houston:

j


Page e181

U282M110023 0023


TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 170 I North Congress Ave.* Austin. Texas 78701-1494 * 512/46 -9734 * FAX: 5 12/463-9838 *http://v·iww.tea.statc.tx.u

Charter Renewal

September 11, 2007

Mr. Peter G. Briggs Richard Milburn Academy/Texas, Inc. 1263 Terminal Loop McQueeney,TX 78123

Re: Charter Renewal for Richard Milburn Academy (Ector County) (CDN 068801)

Dear Mr. Peter Briggs:

Iam pleased to inform you that your charter contract has been extended until July 31, 2015; 10 years from the end date of the original contract. After this expanded renewal, the charter contract shall consist of the following:

• the representations and assurances made by the charter holder in the original

request for application under the standard application system;


• any condition, amendment, modification, revision, or other change to the charter





Note that this contract is contingent upon legislative authorization and that the contract and the funding under state and federal law may be modified or even terminated by future legislative act. Furthermore, state and federal laws and rules may periodically be adopted, amended, or repealed and all such changes applicable to the charter' holder or its charter school(s) may modify this contract, as of the effective date provided in the law or rule. Nothing in this contract shall be construed to entitle the charter holder to any privilege or benefit, including any funding, but in accordance with state and federal laws .in effect and as they may in the future be amended. A contract term that conflicts w.ith any state or federal law or rule is superseded by the law or rule to the extent that the law or rule conflicts with the contract term.


Page e182

U282M110023 0023


Texas State Board of Education: 4Milburn Academy/Texas, Inc.:

,L--....¥ er: //,'-'A........: =:; /d-; 3Cj: Q ;) c £; Geraldine Miller, Chair date Peter Briggs, Chair / at-:/Ll....

Chief Operating Officer of Richard Milburn Academy-Ector County:

fEDrlE lE w1 rE 1 mll APR 11 2003 j UJ)

Charter Schoofs


Page e183

U282M110023 0023


TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1701 North Congress Ave.* Austin, Texas 78701-1494 * 512/463-9734 *FAX: 512/463-9838 *http://www.tea.state.tx.us


December 15, 2004

Mr. Peter G. Briggs, Chairman Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. 27 Congress St. Salem, MA 01970

Dear Mr. Briggs:

l am pleased to inform you that the charter renewal for Richard Milburn Alternative High School - Lubbock (county-district number 152801) is approved for a term of ten years with a contract ending date of July 31, 2013. After renewal, the contract for charter shall consist of the following elements:




• any condition, amendment, modification, revision, or other change to the charter approved by


• the final renewal application, on file with the Division of Charter Schools, including any revisions required by the agency and any amendments to 'the cha er made via the renewal application, except any responses in the following sections (not all applications contain each section listed), including relevant attachments: Code of Conduct; Evaluation of Student Performance; Student Pertormance Goals; Plans and Initiatives to Improve Student Performance; Monitoring Follow-Up; IDEA Key Components; and Information Request, Subsections D and E; and

• the. condition as described in the attached document, Exhibit I; and



Note that a contract term that conflicts with any state or federal law or rule is superseded by the law or rule to the extent that the law or rule conflicts with the contract term. By continuing to operate past the ending date of the original charter, the charter holder indicates its agreement to the contract for charter as described above.

Please contact the Division of Charter Schools at (512) 463-9575 with any questions.

CAROLE RENALES ;i A I •' _;)- d1p ,._ ,If "' ) NOTARY PUBLIC '-tt..,.·t,vrc_.e_ /l'l ULtLA-l/.L/

. \ COMMONWEf'-T:OF MASSACHUSETTS '.MY COMMISSIO:J EXP!R'::S 05/03/2007

, CEO/Chairman Date: [c!tzjor

Enclosure

"Good, Better, Best-never let it rest-until your good is better-and your better is BEST!"


Page e184

U282M110023 0023


., ' ' t' lJ " '4

1. Conditions of Contract. Execution of this contract by the Board is conditioned on full and timely compliance by Charterholder with: (a) the terms, required assurances and conditions of Request for Application #701-97-028; (b) applicable law; and (c) all commitments and representations made in Charterholder's application and any supporting documents (to the extent such commitments and representations are consistent with the terms of this contract).




County, Texas.



an "eligible entity" within the meaning of Section 12.101 (a), TEC. Charterh'Jider shall immediately notify the Board of any legal change in its status ''"hich would disqualify it from holding the charter, of any violation of th{'J termra and conditions of this contract, or of any change in the chief operating officer of the charter school or Charterholder. Charterholder further represents that the person signing this contract has been properly delegated authority to do so.

Entered into this 1s day of June--·' 1998.

Texas State Board of Education

Robert H. Crosb Typed Name


Page e185

U282M110023 0023


\ J

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1701 North Congress Ave.* Austin, Texas 78701-1494 * 512/463-9734 *FAX: 512/463-9838 * http://www.tea.state.tx.us


June 16, 2004


Dear Mr. Briggs:

I am pleased to inform you that the charter renewal for Richard Milburn Academy, Midland (county- district number 165-801) is approved for a term of ten years with a contract endin·g date of July 31, 2013. After renewal, the contract for charter shall consist of the following elements:



• the original contract for charter, as signe·d by the charter holder and the State Board of Education;

• any condition, amendment, modification, revision, or other change to the charter approved by the State Board of Education or the commissioner of education;

• the final renewal application, on file with the Division of Charte.r Schools, including any

revisions required by the agency and any amendments to the charter made via the renewal application, except any responses in the following sections (not' all applications contain each section listed), including relevant attachments: Code of Conduct; Evaluation of Student Performance; Student Performance Goals; Plans and Initiatives to Improve Student Performance; Monitoring Follow-Up; IDEA Key Components; and Information Request, Subsections D and E; and



·...-.,.

Note that a contract term that conflicts with any state or fed.eral law or rule is superseded by the law or rule to the extent that the law or rule conflicts with the contract term. By continuing to operate past the ending date of the original charter, the charter holder indicates its agreement to the contract for charter as described above. Please know that the efforts of those who have contributed to the school's successes are appreciated. I look forward to hearing of the school's accomplishments in its new term. Contact Mary Perry in the Division of Charter Schools at (512) 463-9575 with any questions.


Page e186

U282M110023 0023

# U282M100015

1. Conditions of Contract. Execution of this contract by the Board is conditioned on full and timely compliance by Charterholder with: (a) the terms, required assurances and conditions of Request for Application #701-97-028; (b) applicable law; and (c) all commitments and representations made in Charterholder's application and any supporting documents (to the extent such commitments and representations are consistent with the terms of this contract).




County, Texas.




Entered into this 15 dayof_J_u_n_e , 1998.


By Dr. ck Christie Chairm n

Robert H. Crosby,

Typed Name


Page e187

U282M110023 0023

# U282M100015


Page e188

U282M110023 0023

RMA

27 Congress Street, Shetland Park #310, Salem, MA 01970

Phone (978) 741-7161 Fax (978) 741-0414


A ttachment 5: Student Academic A chievement

Provide documentation on the student academic achievement for each charter school operated or managed by the applicant. Such information should contain performance data both school-wide and by subgroup, and should include comparisons to all students in the State at the same grade level, and, to the extent available, as compared with other schools serving similar demographics of students.

Please refer to the School Report Cards representing each school included in this section.

School Name School Report Cards

Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. RMA, Amarillo Please refer to attachment. RMA, Beaumont Please refer to attachment. RMA, Corpus Christi Please refer to attachment. RMA, Killeen Please refer to attachment.

Richard Milburn Academy of T exas, Inc. RMA, Fort Worth Please refer to attachment. RMA, Suburban Houston Please refer to attachment. RMA, Odessa Please refer to attachment. RMA, Lubbock Please refer to attachment. RMA, Midland Please refer to attachment.


Page e189

U282M110023 0023


Page e190

U282M110023 0023

2009-10 Academic Excellence Indicator System District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (AMARILLO) Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (AMARILLO) Campus #: 188801001 2010 Accountability Rating: AEA: Academically Acceptable This is a Charter School.


Page e191

U282M110023 0023

This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank.


Page e192

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 9 Reading 2010 92% 88% - 88% * * 86% * * 80% * * 83% * 2009 88% 92% - 92% * * > 99% * * > 99% 80% * 88% * Mathematics 2010 72% 43% - 43% * * 33% * * * * * 50% * 2009 69% 42% - 42% * * 29% * * 50% * * 29% * All Tests 2010 71% 50% - 50% * * 43% * * 40% * * 50% * 2009 67% 43% - 43% * 60% 29% * * 50% 33% * 33% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 10 Eng Lang Arts 2010 91% 84% - 84% * 67% 92% * * 88% 81% * 80% * 2009 88% 71% - 71% * 80% 73% * * 79% 64% * 59% * Mathematics 2010 75% 40% - 40% * 33% 43% * * 40% 40% * 47% * 2009 67% 48% - 48% * 44% 54% * * 62% 33% * 47% * Science 2010 75% 46% - 46% * 25% 52% * * 60% 35% * 42% * 2009 67% 50% - 50% * 38% 62% * * 54% 45% * 40% * Soc Studies 2010 93% 79% - 79% * 83% 74% * * 81% 77% 60% 82% * 2009 91% 58% - 58% * 78% 50% * * 64% 50% * 60% * All Tests 2010 66% 36% - 36% * 21% 40% * * 41% 32% 40% 35% * 2009 56% 29% - 29% * 30% 27% * * 36% 21% * 29% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard ^ Grade 11 Eng Lang Arts 2010 93% 85% - 85% * 78% 88% * * 71% 95% * 73% * 2009 93% 67% - 67% * 50% 83% * * 73% 62% * 69% * Mathematics 2010 89% 71% - 71% * 50% 81% * * 80% 63% * 75% * 2009 82% 38% - 38% * 45% 30% * * 30% 45% * 29% * Science 2010 92% 84% - 84% * 63% 95% * * 87% 81% * 92% * 2009 86% 70% - 70% * 55% 89% * * 78% 64% * 64% * Soc Studies 2010 98% 97% - 97% * 86% > 99% * * > 99% 94% * 91% * 2009 97% 95% - 95% * 91% > 99% * * > 99% 91% * 93% * All Tests 2010 83% 68% - 68% * 50% 77% * * 72% 65% * 65% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 9 Reading 2010 92% 88% - 88% * * 86% * * 80% * * 83% * 2009 88% 92% - 92% * * > 99% * * > 99% 80% * 88% * Mathematics 2010 72% 43% - 43% * * 33% * * * * * 50% * 2009 69% 42% - 42% * * 29% * * 50% * * 29% * All Tests 2010 71% 50% - 50% * * 43% * * 40% * * 50% * 2009 67% 43% - 43% * 60% 29% * * 50% 33% * 33% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 10 Eng Lang Arts 2010 91% 84% - 84% * 67% 92% * * 88% 81% * 80% * 2009 88% 71% - 71% * 80% 73% * * 79% 64% * 59% * Mathematics 2010 75% 40% - 40% * 33% 43% * * 40% 40% * 47% * 2009 67% 48% - 48% * 44% 54% * * 62% 33% * 47% * Science 2010 75% 46% - 46% * 25% 52% * * 60% 35% * 42% * 2009 67% 50% - 50% * 38% 62% * * 54% 45% * 40% * Soc Studies 2010 93% 79% - 79% * 83% 74% * * 81% 77% 60% 82% * 2009 91% 58% - 58% * 78% 50% * * 64% 50% * 60% * All Tests 2010 66% 36% - 36% * 21% 40% * * 41% 32% 40% 35% * 2009 56% 29% - 29% * 30% 27% * * 36% 21% * 29% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard ^ Grade 11 Eng Lang Arts 2010 93% 85% - 85% * 78% 88% * * 71% 95% * 73% * 2009 93% 67% - 67% * 50% 83% * * 73% 62% * 69% * Mathematics 2010 89% 71% - 71% * 50% 81% * * 80% 63% * 75% * 2009 82% 38% - 38% * 45% 30% * * 30% 45% * 29% * Science 2010 92% 84% - 84% * 63% 95% * * 87% 81% * 92% * 2009 86% 70% - 70% * 55% 89% * * 78% 64% * 64% * Soc Studies 2010 98% 97% - 97% * 86% > 99% * * > 99% 94% * 91% * 2009 97% 95% - 95% * 91% > 99% * * > 99% 91% * 93% * All Tests 2010 83% 68% - 68% * 50% 77% * * 72% 65% * 65% * 2009 76% 38% - 38% * 33% 43% * * 33% 43% * 35% *


Page e193

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 85% - 85% * 73% 89% * * 81% 88% 64% 78% * 2009 88% 74% - 74% * 69% 82% * * 82% 66% 86% 68% * Mathematics 2010 84% 53% - 53% * 43% 58% * * 56% 51% 17% 57% * 2009 80% 43% - 43% * 46% 40% * * 48% 37% * 36% * Science 2010 83% 64% - 64% * 40% 74% * * 73% 56% * 61% * 2009 78% 59% - 59% * 47% 73% * * 64% 55% * 52% * Soc Studies 2010 95% 87% - 87% * 84% 86% * * 90% 84% 67% 85% * 2009 93% 74% - 74% * 85% 71% * * 79% 70% * 76% * All Tests 2010 77% 51% - 51% * 36% 57% * * 55% 48% 33% 48% * 2009 72% 35% - 35% * 37% 33% * * 38% 32% 14% 33% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard with TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 96% 90% - 90% * 82% 93% * * 89% 91% 73% 88% * 2009 95% 82% - 82% * 73% 91% * * 88% 75% 86% 78% * Mathematics 2010 91% 70% - 70% * 52% 77% * * 76% 64% 67% 76% * 2009 88% 60% - 60% * 67% 57% * * 61% 59% * 53% * Science 2010 92% 77% - 77% * 60% 86% * * 83% 72% * 81% * 2009 83% 70% - 70% * 63% 82% * * 77% 64% * 62% * Soc Studies 2010 99% 97% - 97% * 95% 98% * * > 99% 95% 83% 94% * 2009 98% 96% - 96% * 95% 96% * * 96% 96% * 97% * All Tests 2010 88% 64% - 64% * 40% 72% * * 73% 56% 58% 63% * 2009 82% 54% - 54% * 56% 56% * * 59% 50% 43% 49% * TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% 6% - 6% * 5% 7% * * 8% 5% < 1% 7% * 2009 31% 5% - 5% * 4% 6% * * 6% 3% < 1% 5% * Mathematics 2010 29% 4% - 4% * < 1% 4% * * 6% 3% < 1% 3% * 2009 28% 5% - 5% * 4% 7% * * 10% < 1% * 3% * Science 2010 28% 5% - 5% * < 1% 5% * * 10% < 1% * 3% * 2009 26% < 1% - < 1% * < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% * Soc Studies 2010 47% 18% - 18% * < 1% 23% * * 27% 11% < 1% 12% * 2009 44% 9% - 9% * 5% 13% * * 13% 4% * 10% * All Tests 2010 15% 3% - 3% * < 1% 3% * * 8% < 1% < 1% 4% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 85% - 85% * 73% 89% * * 81% 88% 64% 78% * 2009 88% 74% - 74% * 69% 82% * * 82% 66% 86% 68% * Mathematics 2010 84% 53% - 53% * 43% 58% * * 56% 51% 17% 57% * 2009 80% 43% - 43% * 46% 40% * * 48% 37% * 36% * Science 2010 83% 64% - 64% * 40% 74% * * 73% 56% * 61% * 2009 78% 59% - 59% * 47% 73% * * 64% 55% * 52% * Soc Studies 2010 95% 87% - 87% * 84% 86% * * 90% 84% 67% 85% * 2009 93% 74% - 74% * 85% 71% * * 79% 70% * 76% * All Tests 2010 77% 51% - 51% * 36% 57% * * 55% 48% 33% 48% * 2009 72% 35% - 35% * 37% 33% * * 38% 32% 14% 33% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard with TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 96% 90% - 90% * 82% 93% * * 89% 91% 73% 88% * 2009 95% 82% - 82% * 73% 91% * * 88% 75% 86% 78% * Mathematics 2010 91% 70% - 70% * 52% 77% * * 76% 64% 67% 76% * 2009 88% 60% - 60% * 67% 57% * * 61% 59% * 53% * Science 2010 92% 77% - 77% * 60% 86% * * 83% 72% * 81% * 2009 83% 70% - 70% * 63% 82% * * 77% 64% * 62% * Soc Studies 2010 99% 97% - 97% * 95% 98% * * > 99% 95% 83% 94% * 2009 98% 96% - 96% * 95% 96% * * 96% 96% * 97% * All Tests 2010 88% 64% - 64% * 40% 72% * * 73% 56% 58% 63% * 2009 82% 54% - 54% * 56% 56% * * 59% 50% 43% 49% * TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% 6% - 6% * 5% 7% * * 8% 5% < 1% 7% * 2009 31% 5% - 5% * 4% 6% * * 6% 3% < 1% 5% * Mathematics 2010 29% 4% - 4% * < 1% 4% * * 6% 3% < 1% 3% * 2009 28% 5% - 5% * 4% 7% * * 10% < 1% * 3% * Science 2010 28% 5% - 5% * < 1% 5% * * 10% < 1% * 3% * 2009 26% < 1% - < 1% * < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% * Soc Studies 2010 47% 18% - 18% * < 1% 23% * * 27% 11% < 1% 12% * 2009 44% 9% - 9% * 5% 13% * * 13% 4% * 10% * All Tests 2010 15% 3% - 3% * < 1% 3% * * 8% < 1% < 1% 4% * 2009 15% < 1% - < 1% * < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% *


Page e194

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Progress (Sum of All Grades Tested) (AEA Indicator) 2010 85% 89% - 89% 88% 83% 92% * * 92% 87% 87% 89% * 2009 81% 88% - 88% 63% 88% 90% * * 88% 87% 89% 85% * TAKS-M Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 85% > 99% - > 99% * * > 99% * * * * > 99% > 99% * 2009 82% > 99% - > 99% * * * * * * * > 99% * * Mathematics 2010 75% 91% - 91% * * 90% * * 83% > 99% 91% 88% * 2009 69% 67% - 67% * * * * * * * 67% * * Science 2010 58% 70% - 70% * * 67% * * 80% 60% 70% 63% * 2009 51% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 67% 71% - 71% * * 71% * * * * 71% 60% * 2009 64% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 64% 64% - 64% * * 60% * * 67% 60% 64% 50% * 2009 57% 78% - 78% * * > 99% * * > 99% * 78% 67% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 86% - 86% * 73% 90% * * 82% 89% 76% 80% * 2009 88% 76% - 76% 40% 71% 84% * * 84% 68% 92% 71% * Mathematics 2010 84% 58% - 58% * 43% 64% * * 60% 57% 65% 62% * 2009 80% 45% - 45% * 46% 45% * * 53% 37% 50% 36% * Science 2010 82% 64% - 64% * 40% 73% * * 74% 56% 62% 62% * 2009 77% 60% - 60% * 48% 75% * * 68% 52% 83% 50% * Soc Studies 2010 94% 85% - 85% * 84% 84% * * 88% 83% 69% 82% * 2009 92% 74% - 74% * 82% 72% * * 81% 67% 50% 73% * All Tests 2010 76% 51% - 51% * 36% 56% * * 53% 49% 39% 47% * 2009 71% 40% - 40% 40% 38% 40% * * 45% 35% 50% 38% * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% 9% - 9% * 5% 10% * * 11% 9% 18% 11% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Progress (Sum of All Grades Tested) (AEA Indicator) 2010 85% 89% - 89% 88% 83% 92% * * 92% 87% 87% 89% * 2009 81% 88% - 88% 63% 88% 90% * * 88% 87% 89% 85% * TAKS-M Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 85% > 99% - > 99% * * > 99% * * * * > 99% > 99% * 2009 82% > 99% - > 99% * * * * * * * > 99% * * Mathematics 2010 75% 91% - 91% * * 90% * * 83% > 99% 91% 88% * 2009 69% 67% - 67% * * * * * * * 67% * * Science 2010 58% 70% - 70% * * 67% * * 80% 60% 70% 63% * 2009 51% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 67% 71% - 71% * * 71% * * * * 71% 60% * 2009 64% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 64% 64% - 64% * * 60% * * 67% 60% 64% 50% * 2009 57% 78% - 78% * * > 99% * * > 99% * 78% 67% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 86% - 86% * 73% 90% * * 82% 89% 76% 80% * 2009 88% 76% - 76% 40% 71% 84% * * 84% 68% 92% 71% * Mathematics 2010 84% 58% - 58% * 43% 64% * * 60% 57% 65% 62% * 2009 80% 45% - 45% * 46% 45% * * 53% 37% 50% 36% * Science 2010 82% 64% - 64% * 40% 73% * * 74% 56% 62% 62% * 2009 77% 60% - 60% * 48% 75% * * 68% 52% 83% 50% * Soc Studies 2010 94% 85% - 85% * 84% 84% * * 88% 83% 69% 82% * 2009 92% 74% - 74% * 82% 72% * * 81% 67% 50% 73% * All Tests 2010 76% 51% - 51% * 36% 56% * * 53% 49% 39% 47% * 2009 71% 40% - 40% 40% 38% 40% * * 45% 35% 50% 38% * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% 9% - 9% * 5% 10% * * 11% 9% 18% 11% * Mathematics 2010 28% 4% - 4% * < 1% 3% * * 5% 2% < 1% 2% *


Page e195

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP 2010 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.6% 92.0% - 91.5% 75.0% 95.9% 90.1% * * 93.2% 90.2% 96.4% 90.6% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 84.6% - 84.1% 62.5% 91.8% 81.1% * * 83.6% 84.3% 50.0% 82.1% - Not on TAKS 7.8% 7.4% - 7.4% 12.5% 4.1% 9.0% * * 9.6% 5.9% 46.4% 8.5% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 1.1% - 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 1.8% * * 2.7% 0.0% 7.1% 0.9% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 4.6% - 4.5% 0.0% 2.0% 6.3% * * 6.8% 2.9% 28.6% 5.7% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 1.7% - 1.7% 12.5% 2.0% 0.9% * * 0.0% 2.9% 10.7% 1.9% - By Acct Status Acct System 90.0% 50.3% - 50.0% 37.5% 51.0% 52.3% * * 54.8% 47.1% 42.9% 43.4% - Non-Acct System 8.6% 41.7% - 41.5% 37.5% 44.9% 37.8% * * 38.4% 43.1% 53.6% 47.2% - Mobile 4.4% 37.1% - 36.9% 37.5% 42.9% 31.5% * * 31.5% 40.2% 25.0% 41.5% - Non-Acct Test 4.2% 4.6% - 4.5% 0.0% 2.0% 6.3% * * 6.8% 2.9% 28.6% 5.7% - Not Tested 1.4% 8.0% - 8.5% 25.0% 4.1% 9.9% * * 6.8% 9.8% 3.6% 9.4% - Absent 0.1% 2.3% - 2.3% 12.5% 2.0% 1.8% * * 0.0% 3.9% 0.0% 0.9% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 5.7% - 6.3% 12.5% 2.0% 8.1% * * 6.8% 5.9% 3.6% 8.5% - Total Count 3,175,337 175 - 176 8 49 111 3 4 73 102 28 106 0 2009 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.5% 97.3% - 97.3% 91.7% 96.6% 98.2% * * 100.0% 94.7% 100.0% 97.7% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 89.8% - 89.8% 83.3% 93.1% 88.4% * * 88.0% 91.6% 36.4% 89.7% - Not on TAKS 7.7% 7.5% - 7.5% 8.3% 3.4% 9.8% * * 12.0% 3.2% 63.6% 8.0% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 2.1% - 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% * * 3.3% 1.1% 18.2% 2.3% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 4.8% - 4.8% 8.3% 3.4% 5.4% * * 7.6% 2.1% 40.9% 5.7% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 0.5% - 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% * * 1.1% 0.0% 4.5% 0.0% - By Acct Status Acct System 87.3% 35.8% - 35.8% 33.3% 46.6% 31.3% * * 35.9% 35.8% 27.3% 49.4% - Non-Acct System 11.2% 61.5% - 61.5% 58.3% 50.0% 67.0% * * 64.1% 58.9% 72.7% 48.3% - Mobile 4.7% 55.1% - 55.1% 50.0% 46.6% 58.9% * * 54.3% 55.8% 18.2% 40.2% - Non-Acct Test 6.4% 6.4% - 6.4% 8.3% 3.4% 8.0% * * 9.8% 3.2% 54.5% 8.0% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Not Tested 1.5% 2.7% - 2.7% 8.3% 3.4% 1.8% * * 0.0% 5.3% 0.0% 2.3% - Absent 0.1% 0.5% - 0.5% 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% * * 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 1.1% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 2.1% - 2.1% 8.3% 1.7% 1.8% * * 0.0% 4.2% 0.0% 1.1% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP 2010 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.6% 92.0% - 91.5% 75.0% 95.9% 90.1% * * 93.2% 90.2% 96.4% 90.6% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 84.6% - 84.1% 62.5% 91.8% 81.1% * * 83.6% 84.3% 50.0% 82.1% - Not on TAKS 7.8% 7.4% - 7.4% 12.5% 4.1% 9.0% * * 9.6% 5.9% 46.4% 8.5% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 1.1% - 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 1.8% * * 2.7% 0.0% 7.1% 0.9% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 4.6% - 4.5% 0.0% 2.0% 6.3% * * 6.8% 2.9% 28.6% 5.7% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 1.7% - 1.7% 12.5% 2.0% 0.9% * * 0.0% 2.9% 10.7% 1.9% - By Acct Status Acct System 90.0% 50.3% - 50.0% 37.5% 51.0% 52.3% * * 54.8% 47.1% 42.9% 43.4% - Non-Acct System 8.6% 41.7% - 41.5% 37.5% 44.9% 37.8% * * 38.4% 43.1% 53.6% 47.2% - Mobile 4.4% 37.1% - 36.9% 37.5% 42.9% 31.5% * * 31.5% 40.2% 25.0% 41.5% - Non-Acct Test 4.2% 4.6% - 4.5% 0.0% 2.0% 6.3% * * 6.8% 2.9% 28.6% 5.7% - Not Tested 1.4% 8.0% - 8.5% 25.0% 4.1% 9.9% * * 6.8% 9.8% 3.6% 9.4% - Absent 0.1% 2.3% - 2.3% 12.5% 2.0% 1.8% * * 0.0% 3.9% 0.0% 0.9% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 5.7% - 6.3% 12.5% 2.0% 8.1% * * 6.8% 5.9% 3.6% 8.5% - Total Count 3,175,337 175 - 176 8 49 111 3 4 73 102 28 106 0 2009 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.5% 97.3% - 97.3% 91.7% 96.6% 98.2% * * 100.0% 94.7% 100.0% 97.7% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 89.8% - 89.8% 83.3% 93.1% 88.4% * * 88.0% 91.6% 36.4% 89.7% - Not on TAKS 7.7% 7.5% - 7.5% 8.3% 3.4% 9.8% * * 12.0% 3.2% 63.6% 8.0% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 2.1% - 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% * * 3.3% 1.1% 18.2% 2.3% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 4.8% - 4.8% 8.3% 3.4% 5.4% * * 7.6% 2.1% 40.9% 5.7% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 0.5% - 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% * * 1.1% 0.0% 4.5% 0.0% - By Acct Status Acct System 87.3% 35.8% - 35.8% 33.3% 46.6% 31.3% * * 35.9% 35.8% 27.3% 49.4% - Non-Acct System 11.2% 61.5% - 61.5% 58.3% 50.0% 67.0% * * 64.1% 58.9% 72.7% 48.3% - Mobile 4.7% 55.1% - 55.1% 50.0% 46.6% 58.9% * * 54.3% 55.8% 18.2% 40.2% - Non-Acct Test 6.4% 6.4% - 6.4% 8.3% 3.4% 8.0% * * 9.8% 3.2% 54.5% 8.0% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Not Tested 1.5% 2.7% - 2.7% 8.3% 3.4% 1.8% * * 0.0% 5.3% 0.0% 2.3% - Absent 0.1% 0.5% - 0.5% 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% * * 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 1.1% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 2.1% - 2.1% 8.3% 1.7% 1.8% * * 0.0% 4.2% 0.0% 1.1% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Count 3,132,150 187 - 187 12 58 112 3 2 92 95 22 87 0


Page e196

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 5 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers Percent of Failers Passing TAKS (Sum of Grades 4-11) Reading/ELA 2010 57% 46% - 46% * 20% 63% * * 57% 33% * 44% * 2009 43% 63% - 63% * 60% * * * 60% * * * * Mathematics 2010 43% 41% - 41% * 22% 48% * * 50% 35% * 47% * 2009 36% 27% - 27% * 25% 29% * * 38% 15% * 19% * Attendance Rate 2008-09 95.6% 81.8% - 81.8% 77.8% 80.7% 83.0% * * 83.1% 80.5% 87.3% 81.3% - 2007-08 95.5% 82.6% - 82.6% 83.2% 82.0% 82.8% * - 84.1% 81.5% 86.2% 81.7% - Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 7-12) (AEA Indicator) 2008-09 2.0% 18.4% - 18.4% 22.7% 19.8% 17.7% * * 17.3% 19.4% 16.7% 20.2% - 2007-08 2.2% 20.3% - 20.3% 21.1% 23.7% 18.8% * * 23.5% 17.8% 7.1% 18.7% - 4-Year Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2009 Graduated 80.6% 31.7% - 31.7% * 25.0% 36.5% - - 28.6% 35.0% 44.4% 49.2% - Received GED 1.4% 18.3% - 18.3% * 19.6% 17.3% - - 17.9% 18.8% 0.0% 4.8% - Continued HS 8.6% 15.2% - 15.2% * 25.0% 10.6% - - 17.9% 12.5% 22.2% 15.9% - Dropped Out 9.4% 34.8% - 34.8% * 30.4% 35.6% - - 35.7% 33.8% 33.3% 30.2% - Class of 2008 Graduated 79.1% 33.6% - 33.6% 28.6% 24.4% 39.2% - - 37.0% 31.6% 75.0% 24.5% - Received GED 1.5% 11.5% - 11.5% 0.0% 9.8% 13.5% - - 8.7% 13.2% 0.0% 15.1% - Continued HS 8.9% 23.0% - 23.0% 28.6% 26.8% 20.3% - - 23.9% 22.4% 12.5% 17.0% - Dropped Out 10.5% 32.0% - 32.0% 42.9% 39.0% 27.0% - - 30.4% 32.9% 12.5% 43.4% - 5-Year Extended Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2008 Graduated 83.4% 43.7% - 43.7% 37.5% 33.3% 50.0% - - 48.0% 40.8% 77.8% 31.5% - Received GED 2.1% 15.9% - 15.9% 0.0% 16.7% 17.1% - - 12.0% 18.4% 0.0% 18.5% - Continued HS 2.4% 1.6% - 1.6% 12.5% 0.0% 1.3% - - 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% - Dropped Out 12.2% 38.9% - 38.9% 50.0% 50.0% 31.6% - - 36.0% 40.8% 22.2% 46.3% - Completion Rate II (Graduates, Continuers, and GED) (AEA Indicator) Class of 2009 90.6% 65.2% - 65.2% * 69.6% 64.4% - - 64.3% 66.3% 66.7% 69.8% - Class of 2008 89.5% 68.0% - 68.0% 57.1% 61.0% 73.0% - - 69.6% 67.1% 87.5% 56.6% - Completion Rate I (Graduates and Continuers) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Class of 2009 89.2% 47.0% - 47.0% * 50.0% 47.1% - - 46.4% 47.5% 66.7% 65.1% - Class of 2008 88.0% 56.6% - 56.6% 57.1% 51.2% 59.5% - - 60.9% 53.9% 87.5% 41.5% - COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 5 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers Percent of Failers Passing TAKS (Sum of Grades 4-11) Reading/ELA 2010 57% 46% - 46% * 20% 63% * * 57% 33% * 44% * 2009 43% 63% - 63% * 60% * * * 60% * * * * Mathematics 2010 43% 41% - 41% * 22% 48% * * 50% 35% * 47% * 2009 36% 27% - 27% * 25% 29% * * 38% 15% * 19% * Attendance Rate 2008-09 95.6% 81.8% - 81.8% 77.8% 80.7% 83.0% * * 83.1% 80.5% 87.3% 81.3% - 2007-08 95.5% 82.6% - 82.6% 83.2% 82.0% 82.8% * - 84.1% 81.5% 86.2% 81.7% - Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 7-12) (AEA Indicator) 2008-09 2.0% 18.4% - 18.4% 22.7% 19.8% 17.7% * * 17.3% 19.4% 16.7% 20.2% - 2007-08 2.2% 20.3% - 20.3% 21.1% 23.7% 18.8% * * 23.5% 17.8% 7.1% 18.7% - 4-Year Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2009 Graduated 80.6% 31.7% - 31.7% * 25.0% 36.5% - - 28.6% 35.0% 44.4% 49.2% - Received GED 1.4% 18.3% - 18.3% * 19.6% 17.3% - - 17.9% 18.8% 0.0% 4.8% - Continued HS 8.6% 15.2% - 15.2% * 25.0% 10.6% - - 17.9% 12.5% 22.2% 15.9% - Dropped Out 9.4% 34.8% - 34.8% * 30.4% 35.6% - - 35.7% 33.8% 33.3% 30.2% - Class of 2008 Graduated 79.1% 33.6% - 33.6% 28.6% 24.4% 39.2% - - 37.0% 31.6% 75.0% 24.5% - Received GED 1.5% 11.5% - 11.5% 0.0% 9.8% 13.5% - - 8.7% 13.2% 0.0% 15.1% - Continued HS 8.9% 23.0% - 23.0% 28.6% 26.8% 20.3% - - 23.9% 22.4% 12.5% 17.0% - Dropped Out 10.5% 32.0% - 32.0% 42.9% 39.0% 27.0% - - 30.4% 32.9% 12.5% 43.4% - 5-Year Extended Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2008 Graduated 83.4% 43.7% - 43.7% 37.5% 33.3% 50.0% - - 48.0% 40.8% 77.8% 31.5% - Received GED 2.1% 15.9% - 15.9% 0.0% 16.7% 17.1% - - 12.0% 18.4% 0.0% 18.5% - Continued HS 2.4% 1.6% - 1.6% 12.5% 0.0% 1.3% - - 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% - Dropped Out 12.2% 38.9% - 38.9% 50.0% 50.0% 31.6% - - 36.0% 40.8% 22.2% 46.3% - Completion Rate II (Graduates, Continuers, and GED) (AEA Indicator) Class of 2009 90.6% 65.2% - 65.2% * 69.6% 64.4% - - 64.3% 66.3% 66.7% 69.8% - Class of 2008 89.5% 68.0% - 68.0% 57.1% 61.0% 73.0% - - 69.6% 67.1% 87.5% 56.6% - Completion Rate I (Graduates and Continuers) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Class of 2009 89.2% 47.0% - 47.0% * 50.0% 47.1% - - 46.4% 47.5% 66.7% 65.1% - Class of 2008 88.0% 56.6% - 56.6% 57.1% 51.2% 59.5% - - 60.9% 53.9% 87.5% 41.5% - COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 2007-08 23.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -


Page e197

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 6 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP RHSP/DAP Graduates Class of 2009 82.5% 81.0% - 81.0% * 85.7% 78.7% - - 71.4% 88.6% * 78.8% - Class of 2008 81.4% 67.6% - 67.6% * 73.7% 67.4% - * 72.4% 64.1% 12.5% 79.3% - AP/IB Results Tested 2009 21.2% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a 2008 20.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a Examinees >= Criterion 2009 51.2% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 50.1% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Scores >= Criterion 2009 47.4% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 46.0% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Texas Success Initiative (TSI) – Higher Education Readiness Component Eng Lang Arts 2010 60% 34% - 34% * 33% 35% * * 36% 33% * 27% * 2009 63% 22% - 22% * 17% 27% * * 27% 17% * 27% * Mathematics 2010 66% 23% - 23% * 13% 25% * * 27% 20% * 17% * 2009 62% 15% - 15% * 18% 11% * * 20% 10% * < 1% * SAT/ACT Results Tested Class of 2009 61.5% 3.2% - 3.2% * 0.0% 4.3% - - 3.7% 2.9% n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 65.0% 1.7% - 1.7% - 0.0% 2.4% - * 3.8% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a At/Above Criterion Class of 2009 26.9% * - * - - * - - * * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 27.2% * - * - - * - - * - n/a n/a n/a Average SAT Score Class of 2009 985 * - * - - * - - * * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 987 - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Average ACT Score Class of 2009 20.5 - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 20.5 * - * - - * - - * - n/a n/a n/a College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% 26% - 26% * 38% 23% * * 20% 30% * 32% * Class of 2008 59% 32% - 32% * 36% 31% * * 25% 39% * 40% * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% 41% - 41% * 50% 41% * * 57% 30% * 42% * Class of 2008 58% 26% - 26% * 33% 24% * * 30% 23% * 31% * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% 24% - 24% * 33% 23% * * 23% 25% * 28% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 6 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP RHSP/DAP Graduates Class of 2009 82.5% 81.0% - 81.0% * 85.7% 78.7% - - 71.4% 88.6% * 78.8% - Class of 2008 81.4% 67.6% - 67.6% * 73.7% 67.4% - * 72.4% 64.1% 12.5% 79.3% - AP/IB Results Tested 2009 21.2% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a 2008 20.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a Examinees >= Criterion 2009 51.2% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 50.1% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Scores >= Criterion 2009 47.4% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 46.0% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Texas Success Initiative (TSI) – Higher Education Readiness Component Eng Lang Arts 2010 60% 34% - 34% * 33% 35% * * 36% 33% * 27% * 2009 63% 22% - 22% * 17% 27% * * 27% 17% * 27% * Mathematics 2010 66% 23% - 23% * 13% 25% * * 27% 20% * 17% * 2009 62% 15% - 15% * 18% 11% * * 20% 10% * < 1% * SAT/ACT Results Tested Class of 2009 61.5% 3.2% - 3.2% * 0.0% 4.3% - - 3.7% 2.9% n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 65.0% 1.7% - 1.7% - 0.0% 2.4% - * 3.8% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a At/Above Criterion Class of 2009 26.9% * - * - - * - - * * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 27.2% * - * - - * - - * - n/a n/a n/a Average SAT Score Class of 2009 985 * - * - - * - - * * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 987 - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Average ACT Score Class of 2009 20.5 - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 20.5 * - * - - * - - * - n/a n/a n/a College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% 26% - 26% * 38% 23% * * 20% 30% * 32% * Class of 2008 59% 32% - 32% * 36% 31% * * 25% 39% * 40% * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% 41% - 41% * 50% 41% * * 57% 30% * 42% * Class of 2008 58% 26% - 26% * 33% 24% * * 30% 23% * 31% * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% 24% - 24% * 33% 23% * * 23% 25% * 28% * Class of 2008 44% 13% - 13% * 18% 12% * * 10% 17% * 13% *


Page e198

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Students: 234 100.0% - 234 4,824,778 Students By Grade: Early Childhood Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Pre-Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 4.4% Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 1 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.9% Grade 2 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.8% Grade 3 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.7% Grade 4 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 5 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.5% Grade 6 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 7 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 8 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.2% Grade 9 24 10.3% - 10.3% 8.1% Grade 10 79 33.8% - 33.8% 6.9% Grade 11 65 27.8% - 27.8% 6.4% Grade 12 66 28.2% - 28.2% 5.9% Ethnic Distribution: African American 12 5.1% - 5.1% 14.0% Hispanic 78 33.3% - 33.3% 48.6% White 141 60.3% - 60.3% 33.3% Native American 2 0.9% - 0.9% 0.4% Asian/Pac. Islander 1 0.4% - 0.4% 3.7% Economically Disadvantaged 130 55.6% - 55.6% 59.0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.9% Students w/Disciplinary Placements (2008-09) 4 0.9% - 0.9% 13.4% At-Risk 209 89.3% - 89.3% 47.2% Mobility (2008-09) 324 78.8% - 78.8% 18.9%

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Students: 234 100.0% - 234 4,824,778 Students By Grade: Early Childhood Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Pre-Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 4.4% Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 1 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.9% Grade 2 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.8% Grade 3 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.7% Grade 4 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 5 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.5% Grade 6 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 7 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 8 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.2% Grade 9 24 10.3% - 10.3% 8.1% Grade 10 79 33.8% - 33.8% 6.9% Grade 11 65 27.8% - 27.8% 6.4% Grade 12 66 28.2% - 28.2% 5.9% Ethnic Distribution: African American 12 5.1% - 5.1% 14.0% Hispanic 78 33.3% - 33.3% 48.6% White 141 60.3% - 60.3% 33.3% Native American 2 0.9% - 0.9% 0.4% Asian/Pac. Islander 1 0.4% - 0.4% 3.7% Economically Disadvantaged 130 55.6% - 55.6% 59.0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.9% Students w/Disciplinary Placements (2008-09) 4 0.9% - 0.9% 13.4% At-Risk 209 89.3% - 89.3% 47.2% Mobility (2008-09) 324 78.8% - 78.8% 18.9% Number of Students per Teacher 19.7 n/a - 19.7 14.5


Page e199

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Graduates (Class of 2009): Count Percent Group District State Total Graduates 63 100.0% - 63 264,275 By Ethnicity (incl. Special Ed.): African American 2 3.2% - 2 35,982 Hispanic 14 22.2% - 14 104,854 White 47 74.6% - 47 112,016 Native American 0 0.0% - 0 961 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0.0% - 0 10,462 By Graduation Type (incl. Special Ed.): Minimum H.S. Program 12 19.0% - 12 46,313 Recommended H.S. Pgm./DAP 51 81.0% - 51 217,962 Special Education Graduates 1 1.6% - 1 25,929 CLASS SIZE INFORMATION (Derived from teacher responsibility records.) Campus Class Size Averages by Grade and Subject: Campus Group District State Elementary: Kindergarten - - - 19.3 Grade 1 - - - 19.1 Grade 2 - - - 19.2 Grade 3 - - - 19.3 Grade 4 - - - 19.9 Grade 5 - - - 22.4 Grade 6 - - - 21.1 Mixed Grades - - - 24.7 Secondary: English/Language Arts 10.6 - 10.6 17.8 Foreign Languages 10.6 - 10.6 19.4 Mathematics 11.1 - 11.1 18.5 Science 9.3 - 9.3 19.3

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Graduates (Class of 2009): Count Percent Group District State Total Graduates 63 100.0% - 63 264,275 By Ethnicity (incl. Special Ed.): African American 2 3.2% - 2 35,982 Hispanic 14 22.2% - 14 104,854 White 47 74.6% - 47 112,016 Native American 0 0.0% - 0 961 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0.0% - 0 10,462 By Graduation Type (incl. Special Ed.): Minimum H.S. Program 12 19.0% - 12 46,313 Recommended H.S. Pgm./DAP 51 81.0% - 51 217,962 Special Education Graduates 1 1.6% - 1 25,929 CLASS SIZE INFORMATION (Derived from teacher responsibility records.) Campus Class Size Averages by Grade and Subject: Campus Group District State Elementary: Kindergarten - - - 19.3 Grade 1 - - - 19.1 Grade 2 - - - 19.2 Grade 3 - - - 19.3 Grade 4 - - - 19.9 Grade 5 - - - 22.4 Grade 6 - - - 21.1 Mixed Grades - - - 24.7 Secondary: English/Language Arts 10.6 - 10.6 17.8 Foreign Languages 10.6 - 10.6 19.4 Mathematics 11.1 - 11.1 18.5 Science 9.3 - 9.3 19.3 Social Studies 12.9 - 12.9 20.4


Page e200

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STAFF INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Staff: 19.4 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% Professional Staff: 19.4 100.0% - 100.0% 63.2% Teachers 11.9 61.0% - 61.0% 50.5% Professional Support 6.6 33.9% - 33.9% 8.9% Campus Admin. (School Leader.) 1.0 5.1% - 5.1% 2.8% Educational Aides: 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 9.8% Total Minority Staff: 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 43.9% Teachers By Ethnicity and Sex: African American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 9.5% Hispanic 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 22.5% White 11.9 100.0% - 100.0% 66.4% Native American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 1.3% Males 6.4 54.4% - 54.4% 23.0% Females 5.4 45.6% - 45.6% 77.0% Teachers by Years of Experience: Beginning Teachers 2.8 23.2% - 23.2% 6.0% 1-5 Years Experience 2.0 16.9% - 16.9% 31.0% 6-10 Years Experience 1.0 8.4% - 8.4% 20.3% 11-20 Years Experience 5.1 43.0% - 43.0% 24.4% 0ver 20 Years Experience 1.0 8.4% - 8.4% 18.3% Campus Campus Group District State Average Years Experience of Teachers: 10.1 yrs. - yrs. 10.1 yrs. 11.3 yrs. Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 1.8 yrs. - yrs. 1.8 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers $32,452 - $32,452 $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $40,837 - $40,837 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $44,992 - $44,992 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience $49,139 - $49,139 $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience $49,335 - $49,335 $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $43,526 - $43,526 $48,263 Professional Support $31,937 - $31,937 $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $63,000 - $63,000 $70,209

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STAFF INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Staff: 19.4 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% Professional Staff: 19.4 100.0% - 100.0% 63.2% Teachers 11.9 61.0% - 61.0% 50.5% Professional Support 6.6 33.9% - 33.9% 8.9% Campus Admin. (School Leader.) 1.0 5.1% - 5.1% 2.8% Educational Aides: 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 9.8% Total Minority Staff: 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 43.9% Teachers By Ethnicity and Sex: African American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 9.5% Hispanic 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 22.5% White 11.9 100.0% - 100.0% 66.4% Native American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 1.3% Males 6.4 54.4% - 54.4% 23.0% Females 5.4 45.6% - 45.6% 77.0% Teachers by Years of Experience: Beginning Teachers 2.8 23.2% - 23.2% 6.0% 1-5 Years Experience 2.0 16.9% - 16.9% 31.0% 6-10 Years Experience 1.0 8.4% - 8.4% 20.3% 11-20 Years Experience 5.1 43.0% - 43.0% 24.4% 0ver 20 Years Experience 1.0 8.4% - 8.4% 18.3% Campus Campus Group District State Average Years Experience of Teachers: 10.1 yrs. - yrs. 10.1 yrs. 11.3 yrs. Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 1.8 yrs. - yrs. 1.8 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers $32,452 - $32,452 $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $40,837 - $40,837 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $44,992 - $44,992 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience $49,139 - $49,139 $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience $49,335 - $49,335 $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $43,526 - $43,526 $48,263 Professional Support $31,937 - $31,937 $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $63,000 - $63,000 $70,209 Contracted Instructional Staff (not incl. above): 0.0 - 0.0 1,722.9


Page e201

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE INFORMATION |---------------------------Campus---------------------------| |---------Campus Group---------| (2008-09) General Percent Per All Percent Per All Percent Per Fund Student Funds Student Funds Student By Function: Total Operating Expenditures $991,153 100.0% $4,675 $1,292,284 100.0% $6,096 - - - Instruction (11,95) $522,558 52.7% $2,465 $764,803 59.2% $3,608 - - - Instructional-Related Services (12,13) $46,338 4.7% $219 $96,209 7.4% $454 - - - Instructional Leadership (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - School Leadership (23) $190,998 19.3% $901 $190,998 14.8% $901 - - - Support Services-Student (31,32,33) $78,761 7.9% $372 $79,721 6.2% $376 - - - Other Campus Costs (35,36,51,52,53) $152,498 15.4% $719 $160,553 12.4% $757 - - - By Program: Total Operating Expenditures $838,655 100.0% $3,956 $1,131,731 100.0% $5,338 - - - Bilingual/ESL Education (25) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Career & Technical Education (22) $113,086 13.5% $533 $113,086 10.0% $533 - - - Accelerated Education (24,30) $110,013 13.1% $519 $330,896 29.2% $1,561 - - - Gifted & Talented Education (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Regular Education (11) $591,484 70.5% $2,790 $636,592 56.2% $3,003 - - - Special Education (23) $24,072 2.9% $114 $51,157 4.5% $241 - - - Other (26,28,29) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Student Enrollment by Program: Bilingual/ESL Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.1% Career & Technical Education 171 73.1% - 73.1% 21.3% Gifted & Talented Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Special Education 34 14.5% - 14.5% 9.0% Teachers by Program (population served): Bilingual/ESL Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.0% Career & Technical Education 2.6 21.6% - 21.6% 3.9% Compensatory Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.4% Gifted & Talented Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 2.0% Regular Education 9.3 78.4% - 78.4% 71.0% Special Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 9.6% Other 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.0% '^' Primary Spring Administration, plus October first-time 11th grade testers who pass all 4 tests in October. '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 234 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (A 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 188801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE INFORMATION |---------------------------Campus---------------------------| |---------Campus Group---------| (2008-09) General Percent Per All Percent Per All Percent Per Fund Student Funds Student Funds Student By Function: Total Operating Expenditures $991,153 100.0% $4,675 $1,292,284 100.0% $6,096 - - - Instruction (11,95) $522,558 52.7% $2,465 $764,803 59.2% $3,608 - - - Instructional-Related Services (12,13) $46,338 4.7% $219 $96,209 7.4% $454 - - - Instructional Leadership (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - School Leadership (23) $190,998 19.3% $901 $190,998 14.8% $901 - - - Support Services-Student (31,32,33) $78,761 7.9% $372 $79,721 6.2% $376 - - - Other Campus Costs (35,36,51,52,53) $152,498 15.4% $719 $160,553 12.4% $757 - - - By Program: Total Operating Expenditures $838,655 100.0% $3,956 $1,131,731 100.0% $5,338 - - - Bilingual/ESL Education (25) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Career & Technical Education (22) $113,086 13.5% $533 $113,086 10.0% $533 - - - Accelerated Education (24,30) $110,013 13.1% $519 $330,896 29.2% $1,561 - - - Gifted & Talented Education (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Regular Education (11) $591,484 70.5% $2,790 $636,592 56.2% $3,003 - - - Special Education (23) $24,072 2.9% $114 $51,157 4.5% $241 - - - Other (26,28,29) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Student Enrollment by Program: Bilingual/ESL Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.1% Career & Technical Education 171 73.1% - 73.1% 21.3% Gifted & Talented Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Special Education 34 14.5% - 14.5% 9.0% Teachers by Program (population served): Bilingual/ESL Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.0% Career & Technical Education 2.6 21.6% - 21.6% 3.9% Compensatory Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.4% Gifted & Talented Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 2.0% Regular Education 9.3 78.4% - 78.4% 71.0% Special Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 9.6% Other 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.0% '^' Primary Spring Administration, plus October first-time 11th grade testers who pass all 4 tests in October. '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.


Page e202

U282M110023 0023

2009-10 Academic Excellence Indicator System District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (BEAUMONT) Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (BEAUMONT) Campus #: 123804001 2010 Accountability Rating: AEA: Academically Unacceptable This is a Charter School. Note: District at-risk dropout data were used for 2010 accountability evaluation purposes.


Page e203

U282M110023 0023



Page e204

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 9 Reading 2010 92% 50% - 50% 50% * * * * 71% 40% * 67% * 2009 88% 58% - 58% 58% * * * * 67% 50% * 58% * Mathematics 2010 72% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * * < 1% * < 1% * 2009 69% 13% - 13% 13% * * * * * 20% * 13% * All Tests 2010 71% 14% - 14% 14% * * * * 43% < 1% * 8% * 2009 67% 25% - 25% 25% * * * * 33% 17% * 25% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 10 Eng Lang Arts 2010 91% 67% - 67% 64% * * * * 67% * * 50% * 2009 88% 48% - 48% 43% * * * * 36% 56% * 48% * Mathematics 2010 75% 8% - 8% < 1% * * * * 11% * * < 1% * 2009 67% 16% - 16% 7% * * * * < 1% 25% * 16% * Science 2010 75% 27% - 27% 20% * * * * 38% * * 20% * 2009 67% 19% - 19% 12% * * * * 22% 17% * 19% * Soc Studies 2010 93% 22% - 22% 13% * * * * 25% * * 20% * 2009 91% 57% - 57% 47% * * * * 44% 67% * 57% * All Tests 2010 66% 15% - 15% 8% * * * * 20% * * < 1% * 2009 56% 19% - 19% 13% * * * * 9% 25% * 19% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard ^ Grade 11 Eng Lang Arts 2010 93% 63% - 63% 63% * * * * * 67% * 75% * 2009 93% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 89% 21% - 21% 21% * * * * < 1% 29% * 25% * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 92% 37% - 37% 37% * * * * < 1% 50% * 33% * 2009 86% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 98% 63% - 63% 63% * * * * 40% 71% * 67% * 2009 97% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 83% 22% - 22% 22% * * * * 17% 24% * 21% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 9 Reading 2010 92% 50% - 50% 50% * * * * 71% 40% * 67% * 2009 88% 58% - 58% 58% * * * * 67% 50% * 58% * Mathematics 2010 72% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * * < 1% * < 1% * 2009 69% 13% - 13% 13% * * * * * 20% * 13% * All Tests 2010 71% 14% - 14% 14% * * * * 43% < 1% * 8% * 2009 67% 25% - 25% 25% * * * * 33% 17% * 25% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 10 Eng Lang Arts 2010 91% 67% - 67% 64% * * * * 67% * * 50% * 2009 88% 48% - 48% 43% * * * * 36% 56% * 48% * Mathematics 2010 75% 8% - 8% < 1% * * * * 11% * * < 1% * 2009 67% 16% - 16% 7% * * * * < 1% 25% * 16% * Science 2010 75% 27% - 27% 20% * * * * 38% * * 20% * 2009 67% 19% - 19% 12% * * * * 22% 17% * 19% * Soc Studies 2010 93% 22% - 22% 13% * * * * 25% * * 20% * 2009 91% 57% - 57% 47% * * * * 44% 67% * 57% * All Tests 2010 66% 15% - 15% 8% * * * * 20% * * < 1% * 2009 56% 19% - 19% 13% * * * * 9% 25% * 19% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard ^ Grade 11 Eng Lang Arts 2010 93% 63% - 63% 63% * * * * * 67% * 75% * 2009 93% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 89% 21% - 21% 21% * * * * < 1% 29% * 25% * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 92% 37% - 37% 37% * * * * < 1% 50% * 33% * 2009 86% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 98% 63% - 63% 63% * * * * 40% 71% * 67% * 2009 97% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 83% 22% - 22% 22% * * * * 17% 24% * 21% * 2009 76% * - * * * * * * * * * * *


Page e205

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 58% - 58% 57% * * * * 65% 53% * 65% * 2009 88% 56% - 56% 53% * * * * 53% 58% * 56% * Mathematics 2010 84% 11% - 11% 9% * * * * 6% 14% * 11% * 2009 80% 26% - 26% 19% * * * * 17% 32% * 26% * Science 2010 83% 33% - 33% 31% * * * * 23% 41% * 29% * 2009 78% 32% - 32% 25% * * * * 36% 29% * 32% * Soc Studies 2010 95% 50% - 50% 48% * * * * 31% 67% * 53% * 2009 93% 64% - 64% 55% * * * * 55% 71% * 64% * All Tests 2010 77% 17% - 17% 16% * * * * 26% 11% * 13% * 2009 72% 28% - 28% 24% * * * * 26% 29% * 28% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard with TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 96% 74% - 74% 73% * * * * 80% 70% * 77% * 2009 95% 70% - 70% 66% * * * * 58% 79% * 70% * Mathematics 2010 91% 30% - 30% 28% * * * * 33% 28% * 41% * 2009 88% 35% - 35% 31% * * * * 33% 37% * 35% * Science 2010 92% 33% - 33% 31% * * * * 23% 41% * 29% * 2009 83% 40% - 40% 35% * * * * 45% 36% * 40% * Soc Studies 2010 99% 68% - 68% 67% * * * * 62% 73% * 71% * 2009 98% 84% - 84% 80% * * * * 73% 93% * 84% * All Tests 2010 88% 33% - 33% 32% * * * * 48% 23% * 38% * 2009 82% 37% - 37% 34% * * * * 37% 38% * 37% * TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% * 2009 31% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% * Mathematics 2010 29% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% * 2009 28% 3% - 3% < 1% * * * * 8% < 1% * 3% * Science 2010 28% 3% - 3% < 1% * * * * 8% < 1% * < 1% * 2009 26% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% * Soc Studies 2010 47% 4% - 4% < 1% * * * * 8% < 1% * < 1% * 2009 44% 4% - 4% < 1% * * * * < 1% 7% * 4% * All Tests 2010 15% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 58% - 58% 57% * * * * 65% 53% * 65% * 2009 88% 56% - 56% 53% * * * * 53% 58% * 56% * Mathematics 2010 84% 11% - 11% 9% * * * * 6% 14% * 11% * 2009 80% 26% - 26% 19% * * * * 17% 32% * 26% * Science 2010 83% 33% - 33% 31% * * * * 23% 41% * 29% * 2009 78% 32% - 32% 25% * * * * 36% 29% * 32% * Soc Studies 2010 95% 50% - 50% 48% * * * * 31% 67% * 53% * 2009 93% 64% - 64% 55% * * * * 55% 71% * 64% * All Tests 2010 77% 17% - 17% 16% * * * * 26% 11% * 13% * 2009 72% 28% - 28% 24% * * * * 26% 29% * 28% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard with TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 96% 74% - 74% 73% * * * * 80% 70% * 77% * 2009 95% 70% - 70% 66% * * * * 58% 79% * 70% * Mathematics 2010 91% 30% - 30% 28% * * * * 33% 28% * 41% * 2009 88% 35% - 35% 31% * * * * 33% 37% * 35% * Science 2010 92% 33% - 33% 31% * * * * 23% 41% * 29% * 2009 83% 40% - 40% 35% * * * * 45% 36% * 40% * Soc Studies 2010 99% 68% - 68% 67% * * * * 62% 73% * 71% * 2009 98% 84% - 84% 80% * * * * 73% 93% * 84% * All Tests 2010 88% 33% - 33% 32% * * * * 48% 23% * 38% * 2009 82% 37% - 37% 34% * * * * 37% 38% * 37% * TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% * 2009 31% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% * Mathematics 2010 29% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% * 2009 28% 3% - 3% < 1% * * * * 8% < 1% * 3% * Science 2010 28% 3% - 3% < 1% * * * * 8% < 1% * < 1% * 2009 26% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% * Soc Studies 2010 47% 4% - 4% < 1% * * * * 8% < 1% * < 1% * 2009 44% 4% - 4% < 1% * * * * < 1% 7% * 4% * All Tests 2010 15% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% * 2009 15% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% *


Page e206

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Progress (Sum of All Grades Tested) (AEA Indicator) 2010 85% 71% - 71% 68% * > 99% * * 72% 69% 36% 75% * 2009 81% 63% - 63% 61% * 67% * * 58% 66% * 63% * TAKS-M Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 85% 60% - 60% 60% * * * * * * 60% * * 2009 82% 84% - 84% 83% * * * * 81% * 84% 83% * Mathematics 2010 75% 40% - 40% 40% * * * * 40% * 40% * * 2009 69% 50% - 50% 47% * * * * 47% * 50% 50% * Science 2010 58% 17% - 17% 17% * * * * < 1% * 17% * * 2009 51% 8% - 8% 8% * * * * 10% * 8% 8% * Soc Studies 2010 67% 17% - 17% 17% * * * * < 1% * 17% * * 2009 64% 42% - 42% 42% * * * * 40% * 42% 42% * All Tests 2010 64% 29% - 29% 29% * * * * 17% * 29% * * 2009 57% 26% - 26% 22% * * * * 25% * 26% 22% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 58% - 58% 57% * * * * 63% 55% 38% 61% * 2009 88% 65% - 65% 63% * * * * 66% 63% 84% 64% * Mathematics 2010 84% 13% - 13% 12% * * * * 13% 14% 25% 13% * 2009 80% 35% - 35% 30% * * * * 33% 36% 50% 35% * Science 2010 82% 31% - 31% 29% * * * * 17% 44% 14% 25% * 2009 77% 24% - 24% 19% * * * * 24% 25% 8% 24% * Soc Studies 2010 94% 44% - 44% 42% * * * * 22% 69% 14% 45% * 2009 92% 57% - 57% 50% * * * * 48% 69% 42% 57% * All Tests 2010 76% 18% - 18% 17% * * * * 24% 14% 20% 11% * 2009 71% 27% - 27% 23% * * * * 26% 30% 26% 26% * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Progress (Sum of All Grades Tested) (AEA Indicator) 2010 85% 71% - 71% 68% * > 99% * * 72% 69% 36% 75% * 2009 81% 63% - 63% 61% * 67% * * 58% 66% * 63% * TAKS-M Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 85% 60% - 60% 60% * * * * * * 60% * * 2009 82% 84% - 84% 83% * * * * 81% * 84% 83% * Mathematics 2010 75% 40% - 40% 40% * * * * 40% * 40% * * 2009 69% 50% - 50% 47% * * * * 47% * 50% 50% * Science 2010 58% 17% - 17% 17% * * * * < 1% * 17% * * 2009 51% 8% - 8% 8% * * * * 10% * 8% 8% * Soc Studies 2010 67% 17% - 17% 17% * * * * < 1% * 17% * * 2009 64% 42% - 42% 42% * * * * 40% * 42% 42% * All Tests 2010 64% 29% - 29% 29% * * * * 17% * 29% * * 2009 57% 26% - 26% 22% * * * * 25% * 26% 22% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 58% - 58% 57% * * * * 63% 55% 38% 61% * 2009 88% 65% - 65% 63% * * * * 66% 63% 84% 64% * Mathematics 2010 84% 13% - 13% 12% * * * * 13% 14% 25% 13% * 2009 80% 35% - 35% 30% * * * * 33% 36% 50% 35% * Science 2010 82% 31% - 31% 29% * * * * 17% 44% 14% 25% * 2009 77% 24% - 24% 19% * * * * 24% 25% 8% 24% * Soc Studies 2010 94% 44% - 44% 42% * * * * 22% 69% 14% 45% * 2009 92% 57% - 57% 50% * * * * 48% 69% 42% 57% * All Tests 2010 76% 18% - 18% 17% * * * * 24% 14% 20% 11% * 2009 71% 27% - 27% 23% * * * * 26% 30% 26% 26% * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * Mathematics 2010 28% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% *


Page e207

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP 2010 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.6% 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% - 100.0% - - 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 92.4% - 92.4% 91.9% - 100.0% - - 86.0% 96.8% 42.9% 92.6% - Not on TAKS 7.8% 7.6% - 7.6% 8.1% - 0.0% - - 14.0% 3.2% 57.1% 7.4% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 7.6% - 7.6% 8.1% - 0.0% - - 14.0% 3.2% 57.1% 7.4% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - By Acct Status Acct System 90.0% 54.3% - 54.3% 56.6% - 16.7% - - 51.2% 56.5% 21.4% 47.1% - Non-Acct System 8.6% 45.7% - 45.7% 43.4% - 83.3% - - 48.8% 43.5% 78.6% 52.9% - Mobile 4.4% 38.1% - 38.1% 35.4% - 83.3% - - 34.9% 40.3% 21.4% 45.6% - Non-Acct Test 4.2% 7.6% - 7.6% 8.1% - 0.0% - - 14.0% 3.2% 57.1% 7.4% - Not Tested 1.4% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Total Count 3,175,337 105 - 105 99 0 6 0 0 43 62 14 68 0 2009 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.5% 94.6% - 94.6% 97.4% * 80.0% - - 98.0% 94.9% 95.5% 95.5% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 72.8% - 72.8% 73.1% * 70.0% - - 66.7% 84.6% 4.5% 73.9% - Not on TAKS 7.7% 21.7% - 21.7% 24.4% * 10.0% - - 31.4% 10.3% 90.9% 21.6% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 21.7% - 21.7% 24.4% * 10.0% - - 31.4% 10.3% 90.9% 21.6% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - By Acct Status Acct System 87.3% 46.7% - 46.7% 48.7% * 30.0% - - 37.3% 61.5% 0.0% 48.9% - Non-Acct System 11.2% 47.8% - 47.8% 48.7% * 50.0% - - 60.8% 33.3% 95.5% 46.6% - Mobile 4.7% 26.1% - 26.1% 24.4% * 40.0% - - 29.4% 23.1% 4.5% 25.0% - Non-Acct Test 6.4% 21.7% - 21.7% 24.4% * 10.0% - - 31.4% 10.3% 90.9% 21.6% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Not Tested 1.5% 5.4% - 5.4% 2.6% * 20.0% - - 2.0% 5.1% 4.5% 4.5% - Absent 0.1% 1.1% - 1.1% 1.3% * 0.0% - - 0.0% 2.6% 4.5% 1.1% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 4.3% - 4.3% 1.3% * 20.0% - - 2.0% 2.6% 0.0% 3.4% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP 2010 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.6% 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% - 100.0% - - 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 92.4% - 92.4% 91.9% - 100.0% - - 86.0% 96.8% 42.9% 92.6% - Not on TAKS 7.8% 7.6% - 7.6% 8.1% - 0.0% - - 14.0% 3.2% 57.1% 7.4% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 7.6% - 7.6% 8.1% - 0.0% - - 14.0% 3.2% 57.1% 7.4% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - By Acct Status Acct System 90.0% 54.3% - 54.3% 56.6% - 16.7% - - 51.2% 56.5% 21.4% 47.1% - Non-Acct System 8.6% 45.7% - 45.7% 43.4% - 83.3% - - 48.8% 43.5% 78.6% 52.9% - Mobile 4.4% 38.1% - 38.1% 35.4% - 83.3% - - 34.9% 40.3% 21.4% 45.6% - Non-Acct Test 4.2% 7.6% - 7.6% 8.1% - 0.0% - - 14.0% 3.2% 57.1% 7.4% - Not Tested 1.4% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Total Count 3,175,337 105 - 105 99 0 6 0 0 43 62 14 68 0 2009 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.5% 94.6% - 94.6% 97.4% * 80.0% - - 98.0% 94.9% 95.5% 95.5% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 72.8% - 72.8% 73.1% * 70.0% - - 66.7% 84.6% 4.5% 73.9% - Not on TAKS 7.7% 21.7% - 21.7% 24.4% * 10.0% - - 31.4% 10.3% 90.9% 21.6% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 21.7% - 21.7% 24.4% * 10.0% - - 31.4% 10.3% 90.9% 21.6% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - By Acct Status Acct System 87.3% 46.7% - 46.7% 48.7% * 30.0% - - 37.3% 61.5% 0.0% 48.9% - Non-Acct System 11.2% 47.8% - 47.8% 48.7% * 50.0% - - 60.8% 33.3% 95.5% 46.6% - Mobile 4.7% 26.1% - 26.1% 24.4% * 40.0% - - 29.4% 23.1% 4.5% 25.0% - Non-Acct Test 6.4% 21.7% - 21.7% 24.4% * 10.0% - - 31.4% 10.3% 90.9% 21.6% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Not Tested 1.5% 5.4% - 5.4% 2.6% * 20.0% - - 2.0% 5.1% 4.5% 4.5% - Absent 0.1% 1.1% - 1.1% 1.3% * 0.0% - - 0.0% 2.6% 4.5% 1.1% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 4.3% - 4.3% 1.3% * 20.0% - - 2.0% 2.6% 0.0% 3.4% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Count 3,132,150 92 - 92 78 2 10 0 0 51 39 22 88 0


Page e208

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 5 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers Percent of Failers Passing TAKS (Sum of Grades 4-11) Reading/ELA 2010 57% 29% - 29% 29% * * * * * * * * * 2009 43% 50% - 50% 50% * * * * * 60% * 50% * Mathematics 2010 43% 13% - 13% 13% * * * * < 1% 22% * 22% * 2009 36% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * * < 1% * < 1% * Attendance Rate 2008-09 95.6% 82.2% - 82.2% 82.4% * 81.0% - * 83.9% 80.5% 83.0% 82.6% - 2007-08 95.5% 83.4% - 83.4% 83.5% 77.7% 82.9% - * 83.1% 83.7% 82.5% 83.8% - Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 7-12) (AEA Indicator) 2008-09 2.0% 24.4% - 24.4% 22.3% 42.9% 41.2% - * 23.8% 25.0% 15.6% 20.7% - 2007-08 2.2% 16.1% - 16.1% 16.5% 25.0% 7.7% - * 17.7% 14.5% 19.4% 12.2% - 4-Year Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2009 Graduated 80.6% 42.4% - 42.4% 42.3% * * - * 32.4% 50.0% 55.6% 55.7% - Received GED 1.4% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Continued HS 8.6% 25.9% - 25.9% 26.9% * * - * 37.8% 16.7% 33.3% 9.8% - Dropped Out 9.4% 31.8% - 31.8% 30.8% * * - * 29.7% 33.3% 11.1% 34.4% - Class of 2008 Graduated 79.1% 52.4% - 52.4% 50.0% * * * * 48.5% 55.1% 66.7% 53.5% - Received GED 1.5% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Continued HS 8.9% 25.6% - 25.6% 27.8% * * * * 27.3% 24.5% 13.3% 26.8% - Dropped Out 10.5% 22.0% - 22.0% 22.2% * * * * 24.2% 20.4% 20.0% 19.7% - 5-Year Extended Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2008 Graduated 83.4% 65.9% - 65.9% 64.8% * * * * 63.6% 67.3% 78.6% 71.0% - Received GED 2.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Continued HS 2.4% 4.9% - 4.9% 4.2% * * * * 6.1% 4.1% 0.0% 1.4% - Dropped Out 12.2% 29.3% - 29.3% 31.0% * * * * 30.3% 28.6% 21.4% 27.5% - Completion Rate II (Graduates, Continuers, and GED) (AEA Indicator) Class of 2009 90.6% 68.2% - 68.2% 69.2% * * - * 70.3% 66.7% 88.9% 65.6% - Class of 2008 89.5% 78.0% - 78.0% 77.8% * * * * 75.8% 79.6% 80.0% 80.3% - Completion Rate I (Graduates and Continuers) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Class of 2009 89.2% 68.2% - 68.2% 69.2% * * - * 70.3% 66.7% 88.9% 65.6% - Class of 2008 88.0% 78.0% - 78.0% 77.8% * * * * 75.8% 79.6% 80.0% 80.3% - COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 0.9% - 0.9% 1.0% * 0.0% - - 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 1.2% -

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 5 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers Percent of Failers Passing TAKS (Sum of Grades 4-11) Reading/ELA 2010 57% 29% - 29% 29% * * * * * * * * * 2009 43% 50% - 50% 50% * * * * * 60% * 50% * Mathematics 2010 43% 13% - 13% 13% * * * * < 1% 22% * 22% * 2009 36% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * * < 1% * < 1% * Attendance Rate 2008-09 95.6% 82.2% - 82.2% 82.4% * 81.0% - * 83.9% 80.5% 83.0% 82.6% - 2007-08 95.5% 83.4% - 83.4% 83.5% 77.7% 82.9% - * 83.1% 83.7% 82.5% 83.8% - Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 7-12) (AEA Indicator) 2008-09 2.0% 24.4% - 24.4% 22.3% 42.9% 41.2% - * 23.8% 25.0% 15.6% 20.7% - 2007-08 2.2% 16.1% - 16.1% 16.5% 25.0% 7.7% - * 17.7% 14.5% 19.4% 12.2% - 4-Year Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2009 Graduated 80.6% 42.4% - 42.4% 42.3% * * - * 32.4% 50.0% 55.6% 55.7% - Received GED 1.4% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Continued HS 8.6% 25.9% - 25.9% 26.9% * * - * 37.8% 16.7% 33.3% 9.8% - Dropped Out 9.4% 31.8% - 31.8% 30.8% * * - * 29.7% 33.3% 11.1% 34.4% - Class of 2008 Graduated 79.1% 52.4% - 52.4% 50.0% * * * * 48.5% 55.1% 66.7% 53.5% - Received GED 1.5% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Continued HS 8.9% 25.6% - 25.6% 27.8% * * * * 27.3% 24.5% 13.3% 26.8% - Dropped Out 10.5% 22.0% - 22.0% 22.2% * * * * 24.2% 20.4% 20.0% 19.7% - 5-Year Extended Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2008 Graduated 83.4% 65.9% - 65.9% 64.8% * * * * 63.6% 67.3% 78.6% 71.0% - Received GED 2.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Continued HS 2.4% 4.9% - 4.9% 4.2% * * * * 6.1% 4.1% 0.0% 1.4% - Dropped Out 12.2% 29.3% - 29.3% 31.0% * * * * 30.3% 28.6% 21.4% 27.5% - Completion Rate II (Graduates, Continuers, and GED) (AEA Indicator) Class of 2009 90.6% 68.2% - 68.2% 69.2% * * - * 70.3% 66.7% 88.9% 65.6% - Class of 2008 89.5% 78.0% - 78.0% 77.8% * * * * 75.8% 79.6% 80.0% 80.3% - Completion Rate I (Graduates and Continuers) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Class of 2009 89.2% 68.2% - 68.2% 69.2% * * - * 70.3% 66.7% 88.9% 65.6% - Class of 2008 88.0% 78.0% - 78.0% 77.8% * * * * 75.8% 79.6% 80.0% 80.3% - COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 0.9% - 0.9% 1.0% * 0.0% - - 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 1.2% - 2007-08 23.1% 4.8% - 4.8% 5.2% 0.0% 0.0% - * 4.8% 4.8% 0.0% 4.8% -


Page e209

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 6 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP RHSP/DAP Graduates Class of 2009 82.5% 67.5% - 67.5% 66.7% * - - - 65.0% 70.0% 28.6% 69.2% - Class of 2008 81.4% 97.0% - 97.0% 96.7% * * - * 93.3% 100.0% 85.7% 96.7% - AP/IB Results Tested 2009 21.2% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * * - - 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a 2008 20.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * * - * 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a Examinees >= Criterion 2009 51.2% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 50.1% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Scores >= Criterion 2009 47.4% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 46.0% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Texas Success Initiative (TSI) – Higher Education Readiness Component Eng Lang Arts 2010 60% 19% - 19% 19% * * * * * 25% * 13% * 2009 63% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 66% 5% - 5% 5% * * * * < 1% 7% * < 1% * 2009 62% * - * * * * * * * * * * * SAT/ACT Results Tested Class of 2009 61.5% 36.4% - 36.4% 34.4% * - - - 53.3% 22.2% n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 65.0% 20.0% - 20.0% 18.5% * * - * 13.0% 24.3% n/a n/a n/a At/Above Criterion Class of 2009 26.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * - - - 0.0% * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 27.2% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - - - * * 0.0% n/a n/a n/a Average SAT Score Class of 2009 985 720 - 720 698 * - - - 730 * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 987 685 - 685 696 - - - * * 648 n/a n/a n/a Average ACT Score Class of 2009 20.5 * - * * - - - - * * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 20.5 - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% * * < 1% * Class of 2008 59% 6% - 6% 7% * * * * < 1% 8% * < 1% * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% * * < 1% * Class of 2008 58% 6% - 6% 6% * * * * < 1% 8% * 7% * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% * * < 1% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 6 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP RHSP/DAP Graduates Class of 2009 82.5% 67.5% - 67.5% 66.7% * - - - 65.0% 70.0% 28.6% 69.2% - Class of 2008 81.4% 97.0% - 97.0% 96.7% * * - * 93.3% 100.0% 85.7% 96.7% - AP/IB Results Tested 2009 21.2% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * * - - 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a 2008 20.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * * - * 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a Examinees >= Criterion 2009 51.2% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 50.1% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Scores >= Criterion 2009 47.4% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 46.0% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Texas Success Initiative (TSI) – Higher Education Readiness Component Eng Lang Arts 2010 60% 19% - 19% 19% * * * * * 25% * 13% * 2009 63% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 66% 5% - 5% 5% * * * * < 1% 7% * < 1% * 2009 62% * - * * * * * * * * * * * SAT/ACT Results Tested Class of 2009 61.5% 36.4% - 36.4% 34.4% * - - - 53.3% 22.2% n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 65.0% 20.0% - 20.0% 18.5% * * - * 13.0% 24.3% n/a n/a n/a At/Above Criterion Class of 2009 26.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% * - - - 0.0% * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 27.2% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% - - - * * 0.0% n/a n/a n/a Average SAT Score Class of 2009 985 720 - 720 698 * - - - 730 * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 987 685 - 685 696 - - - * * 648 n/a n/a n/a Average ACT Score Class of 2009 20.5 * - * * - - - - * * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 20.5 - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% * * < 1% * Class of 2008 59% 6% - 6% 7% * * * * < 1% 8% * < 1% * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% * * < 1% * Class of 2008 58% 6% - 6% 6% * * * * < 1% 8% * 7% * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% * * < 1% * Class of 2008 44% < 1% - < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% *


Page e210

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Students: 154 100.0% - 154 4,824,778 Students By Grade: Early Childhood Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Pre-Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 4.4% Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 1 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.9% Grade 2 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.8% Grade 3 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.7% Grade 4 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 5 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.5% Grade 6 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 7 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 8 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.2% Grade 9 42 27.3% - 27.3% 8.1% Grade 10 31 20.1% - 20.1% 6.9% Grade 11 42 27.3% - 27.3% 6.4% Grade 12 39 25.3% - 25.3% 5.9% Ethnic Distribution: African American 146 94.8% - 94.8% 14.0% Hispanic 0 0.0% - 0.0% 48.6% White 7 4.5% - 4.5% 33.3% Native American 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.4% Asian/Pac. Islander 1 0.6% - 0.6% 3.7% Economically Disadvantaged 77 50.0% - 50.0% 59.0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.9% Students w/Disciplinary Placements (2008-09) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 13.4% At-Risk 135 87.7% - 87.7% 47.2% Mobility (2008-09) 154 59.7% - 59.7% 18.9%

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Students: 154 100.0% - 154 4,824,778 Students By Grade: Early Childhood Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Pre-Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 4.4% Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 1 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.9% Grade 2 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.8% Grade 3 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.7% Grade 4 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 5 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.5% Grade 6 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 7 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 8 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.2% Grade 9 42 27.3% - 27.3% 8.1% Grade 10 31 20.1% - 20.1% 6.9% Grade 11 42 27.3% - 27.3% 6.4% Grade 12 39 25.3% - 25.3% 5.9% Ethnic Distribution: African American 146 94.8% - 94.8% 14.0% Hispanic 0 0.0% - 0.0% 48.6% White 7 4.5% - 4.5% 33.3% Native American 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.4% Asian/Pac. Islander 1 0.6% - 0.6% 3.7% Economically Disadvantaged 77 50.0% - 50.0% 59.0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.9% Students w/Disciplinary Placements (2008-09) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 13.4% At-Risk 135 87.7% - 87.7% 47.2% Mobility (2008-09) 154 59.7% - 59.7% 18.9% Number of Students per Teacher 16.5 n/a - 16.5 14.5


Page e211

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Graduates (Class of 2009): Count Percent Group District State Total Graduates 40 100.0% - 40 264,275 By Ethnicity (incl. Special Ed.): African American 39 97.5% - 39 35,982 Hispanic 1 2.5% - 1 104,854 White 0 0.0% - 0 112,016 Native American 0 0.0% - 0 961 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0.0% - 0 10,462 By Graduation Type (incl. Special Ed.): Minimum H.S. Program 13 32.5% - 13 46,313 Recommended H.S. Pgm./DAP 27 67.5% - 27 217,962 Special Education Graduates 7 17.5% - 7 25,929 CLASS SIZE INFORMATION (Derived from teacher responsibility records.) Campus Class Size Averages by Grade and Subject: Campus Group District State Elementary: Kindergarten - - - 19.3 Grade 1 - - - 19.1 Grade 2 - - - 19.2 Grade 3 - - - 19.3 Grade 4 - - - 19.9 Grade 5 - - - 22.4 Grade 6 - - - 21.1 Mixed Grades - - - 24.7 Secondary: English/Language Arts 3.2 - 3.2 17.8 Foreign Languages 4.6 - 4.6 19.4 Mathematics 6.9 - 6.9 18.5 Science 5.0 - 5.0 19.3

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Graduates (Class of 2009): Count Percent Group District State Total Graduates 40 100.0% - 40 264,275 By Ethnicity (incl. Special Ed.): African American 39 97.5% - 39 35,982 Hispanic 1 2.5% - 1 104,854 White 0 0.0% - 0 112,016 Native American 0 0.0% - 0 961 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0.0% - 0 10,462 By Graduation Type (incl. Special Ed.): Minimum H.S. Program 13 32.5% - 13 46,313 Recommended H.S. Pgm./DAP 27 67.5% - 27 217,962 Special Education Graduates 7 17.5% - 7 25,929 CLASS SIZE INFORMATION (Derived from teacher responsibility records.) Campus Class Size Averages by Grade and Subject: Campus Group District State Elementary: Kindergarten - - - 19.3 Grade 1 - - - 19.1 Grade 2 - - - 19.2 Grade 3 - - - 19.3 Grade 4 - - - 19.9 Grade 5 - - - 22.4 Grade 6 - - - 21.1 Mixed Grades - - - 24.7 Secondary: English/Language Arts 3.2 - 3.2 17.8 Foreign Languages 4.6 - 4.6 19.4 Mathematics 6.9 - 6.9 18.5 Science 5.0 - 5.0 19.3 Social Studies 3.9 - 3.9 20.4


Page e212

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STAFF INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Staff: 11.9 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% Professional Staff: 11.9 100.0% - 79.9% 63.2% Teachers 9.3 78.1% - 62.4% 50.5% Professional Support 2.0 16.4% - 13.1% 8.9% Campus Admin. (School Leader.) 0.7 5.5% - 4.4% 2.8% Educational Aides: 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 9.8% Total Minority Staff: 10.9 91.6% - 93.3% 43.9% Teachers By Ethnicity and Sex: African American 7.3 78.5% - 78.5% 9.5% Hispanic 1.0 10.7% - 10.7% 22.5% White 1.0 10.7% - 10.7% 66.4% Native American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 1.3% Males 3.3 35.8% - 35.8% 23.0% Females 6.0 64.2% - 64.2% 77.0% Teachers by Years of Experience: Beginning Teachers 4.0 42.7% - 42.7% 6.0% 1-5 Years Experience 3.0 32.2% - 32.2% 31.0% 6-10 Years Experience 1.3 14.4% - 14.4% 20.3% 11-20 Years Experience 1.0 10.7% - 10.7% 24.4% 0ver 20 Years Experience 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 18.3% Campus Campus Group District State Average Years Experience of Teachers: 3.6 yrs. - yrs. 3.6 yrs. 11.3 yrs. Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 1.4 yrs. - yrs. 1.4 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers $40,153 - $40,153 $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $40,826 - $40,826 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $48,857 - $48,857 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience $43,015 - $43,015 $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience - - - $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $41,927 - $41,927 $48,263 Professional Support $40,849 - $40,849 $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $75,000 - $75,000 $70,209

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STAFF INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Staff: 11.9 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% Professional Staff: 11.9 100.0% - 79.9% 63.2% Teachers 9.3 78.1% - 62.4% 50.5% Professional Support 2.0 16.4% - 13.1% 8.9% Campus Admin. (School Leader.) 0.7 5.5% - 4.4% 2.8% Educational Aides: 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 9.8% Total Minority Staff: 10.9 91.6% - 93.3% 43.9% Teachers By Ethnicity and Sex: African American 7.3 78.5% - 78.5% 9.5% Hispanic 1.0 10.7% - 10.7% 22.5% White 1.0 10.7% - 10.7% 66.4% Native American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 1.3% Males 3.3 35.8% - 35.8% 23.0% Females 6.0 64.2% - 64.2% 77.0% Teachers by Years of Experience: Beginning Teachers 4.0 42.7% - 42.7% 6.0% 1-5 Years Experience 3.0 32.2% - 32.2% 31.0% 6-10 Years Experience 1.3 14.4% - 14.4% 20.3% 11-20 Years Experience 1.0 10.7% - 10.7% 24.4% 0ver 20 Years Experience 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 18.3% Campus Campus Group District State Average Years Experience of Teachers: 3.6 yrs. - yrs. 3.6 yrs. 11.3 yrs. Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 1.4 yrs. - yrs. 1.4 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers $40,153 - $40,153 $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $40,826 - $40,826 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $48,857 - $48,857 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience $43,015 - $43,015 $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience - - - $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $41,927 - $41,927 $48,263 Professional Support $40,849 - $40,849 $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $75,000 - $75,000 $70,209 Contracted Instructional Staff (not incl. above): 0.0 - 0.0 1,722.9


Page e213

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE INFORMATION |---------------------------Campus---------------------------| |---------Campus Group---------| (2008-09) General Percent Per All Percent Per All Percent Per Fund Student Funds Student Funds Student By Function: Total Operating Expenditures $1,260,803 100.0% $7,004 $1,384,273 100.0% $7,690 - - - Instruction (11,95) $511,745 40.6% $2,843 $621,276 44.9% $3,452 - - - Instructional-Related Services (12,13) $71,815 5.7% $399 $79,563 5.7% $442 - - - Instructional Leadership (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - School Leadership (23) $271,376 21.5% $1,508 $271,376 19.6% $1,508 - - - Support Services-Student (31,32,33) $92,123 7.3% $512 $94,418 6.8% $525 - - - Other Campus Costs (35,36,51,52,53) $313,744 24.9% $1,743 $317,640 22.9% $1,765 - - - By Program: Total Operating Expenditures $947,059 100.0% $5,261 $1,066,633 100.0% $5,926 - - - Bilingual/ESL Education (25) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Career & Technical Education (22) $61,170 6.5% $340 $61,170 5.7% $340 - - - Accelerated Education (24,30) $144,568 15.3% $803 $207,615 19.5% $1,153 - - - Gifted & Talented Education (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Regular Education (11) $647,722 68.4% $3,598 $689,551 64.6% $3,831 - - - Special Education (23) $93,599 9.9% $520 $108,297 10.2% $602 - - - Other (26,28,29) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Student Enrollment by Program: Bilingual/ESL Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.1% Career & Technical Education 83 53.9% - 53.9% 21.3% Gifted & Talented Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Special Education 16 10.4% - 10.4% 9.0% Teachers by Program (population served): Bilingual/ESL Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.0% Career & Technical Education 1.4 15.5% - 15.5% 3.9% Compensatory Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.4% Gifted & Talented Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 2.0% Regular Education 7.9 84.5% - 84.5% 71.0% Special Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 9.6% Other 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.0% '^' Primary Spring Administration, plus October first-time 11th grade testers who pass all 4 tests in October. '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 154 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (B 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 123804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE INFORMATION |---------------------------Campus---------------------------| |---------Campus Group---------| (2008-09) General Percent Per All Percent Per All Percent Per Fund Student Funds Student Funds Student By Function: Total Operating Expenditures $1,260,803 100.0% $7,004 $1,384,273 100.0% $7,690 - - - Instruction (11,95) $511,745 40.6% $2,843 $621,276 44.9% $3,452 - - - Instructional-Related Services (12,13) $71,815 5.7% $399 $79,563 5.7% $442 - - - Instructional Leadership (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - School Leadership (23) $271,376 21.5% $1,508 $271,376 19.6% $1,508 - - - Support Services-Student (31,32,33) $92,123 7.3% $512 $94,418 6.8% $525 - - - Other Campus Costs (35,36,51,52,53) $313,744 24.9% $1,743 $317,640 22.9% $1,765 - - - By Program: Total Operating Expenditures $947,059 100.0% $5,261 $1,066,633 100.0% $5,926 - - - Bilingual/ESL Education (25) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Career & Technical Education (22) $61,170 6.5% $340 $61,170 5.7% $340 - - - Accelerated Education (24,30) $144,568 15.3% $803 $207,615 19.5% $1,153 - - - Gifted & Talented Education (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Regular Education (11) $647,722 68.4% $3,598 $689,551 64.6% $3,831 - - - Special Education (23) $93,599 9.9% $520 $108,297 10.2% $602 - - - Other (26,28,29) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Student Enrollment by Program: Bilingual/ESL Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.1% Career & Technical Education 83 53.9% - 53.9% 21.3% Gifted & Talented Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Special Education 16 10.4% - 10.4% 9.0% Teachers by Program (population served): Bilingual/ESL Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.0% Career & Technical Education 1.4 15.5% - 15.5% 3.9% Compensatory Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.4% Gifted & Talented Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 2.0% Regular Education 7.9 84.5% - 84.5% 71.0% Special Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 9.6% Other 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.0% '^' Primary Spring Administration, plus October first-time 11th grade testers who pass all 4 tests in October. '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.


Page e214

U282M110023 0023

2009-10 Academic Excellence Indicator System District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (ECTOR COU Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (MIDLAND) Campus #: 068801002 2010 Accountability Rating: AEA: Academically Acceptable Gold Performance Acknowledgments: Recommended High School Program (Class of 2009) This is a Charter School. Note: District at-risk completion data were used for 2010 accountability evaluation purposes.


Page e215

U282M110023 0023



Page e216

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 9 Reading 2010 92% 78% - 71% * 82% 57% * * 38% 92% < 1% 80% * 2009 88% 69% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 72% 30% - 18% * 33% < 1% * * 20% 17% * 23% * 2009 69% 38% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 71% 35% - 24% * 36% 14% * * 25% 23% < 1% 33% * 2009 67% 38% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 10 Eng Lang Arts 2010 91% 73% - 78% * 60% * * * * 71% * 71% * 2009 88% 65% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 75% 45% - 25% * * * * * * 33% * 40% * 2009 67% 18% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 75% 43% - 13% * * * * * * 17% * 20% * 2009 67% 6% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 93% 77% - 43% * * * * * * 60% * * * 2009 91% 71% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 66% 30% - 20% * 20% * * * * 14% * 29% * 2009 56% 6% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard ^ Grade 11 Eng Lang Arts 2010 93% 79% - 64% * 68% 50% * * 47% 78% * 65% * 2009 93% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 89% 49% - 24% * 24% 29% * * 13% 36% * 25% * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 92% 68% - 52% * 52% 43% * * 33% 71% * 55% * 2009 86% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 98% 88% - 83% * 81% 86% * * 67% > 99% * 85% * 2009 97% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 83% 46% - 24% * 23% 30% * * 7% 39% * 22% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 9 Reading 2010 92% 78% - 71% * 82% 57% * * 38% 92% < 1% 80% * 2009 88% 69% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 72% 30% - 18% * 33% < 1% * * 20% 17% * 23% * 2009 69% 38% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 71% 35% - 24% * 36% 14% * * 25% 23% < 1% 33% * 2009 67% 38% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 10 Eng Lang Arts 2010 91% 73% - 78% * 60% * * * * 71% * 71% * 2009 88% 65% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 75% 45% - 25% * * * * * * 33% * 40% * 2009 67% 18% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 75% 43% - 13% * * * * * * 17% * 20% * 2009 67% 6% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 93% 77% - 43% * * * * * * 60% * * * 2009 91% 71% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 66% 30% - 20% * 20% * * * * 14% * 29% * 2009 56% 6% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard ^ Grade 11 Eng Lang Arts 2010 93% 79% - 64% * 68% 50% * * 47% 78% * 65% * 2009 93% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 89% 49% - 24% * 24% 29% * * 13% 36% * 25% * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 92% 68% - 52% * 52% 43% * * 33% 71% * 55% * 2009 86% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 98% 88% - 83% * 81% 86% * * 67% > 99% * 85% * 2009 97% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 83% 46% - 24% * 23% 30% * * 7% 39% * 22% * 2009 76% * - * * * * * * * * * * *


Page e217

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 78% - 68% 86% 71% 56% * * 48% 82% 20% 71% * 2009 88% 67% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 84% 44% - 22% < 1% 29% 14% * * 14% 28% < 1% 26% * 2009 80% 27% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 83% 61% - 43% * 48% 33% * * 29% 55% 33% 48% * 2009 78% 6% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 95% 85% - 75% * 80% 67% * * 59% 89% 60% 83% * 2009 93% 71% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 77% 41% - 23% 14% 26% 21% * * 15% 29% < 1% 27% * 2009 72% 20% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard with TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 96% 83% - 70% 86% 74% 56% * * 52% 82% 20% 73% * 2009 95% 93% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 91% 52% - 30% 17% 38% 14% * * 14% 41% < 1% 37% * 2009 88% 40% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 92% 67% - 49% * 56% 33% * * 29% 65% 33% 56% * 2009 83% 41% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 99% 89% - 81% * 80% 78% * * 65% 95% 60% 83% * 2009 98% > 99% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 88% 50% - 31% 29% 37% 21% * * 15% 42% < 1% 38% * 2009 82% 40% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% 4% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * 2009 31% < 1% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 29% 2% - 2% < 1% 3% < 1% * * < 1% 3% < 1% 3% * 2009 28% 3% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 28% 3% - 3% * 4% < 1% * * < 1% 5% < 1% 4% * 2009 26% < 1% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 47% 14% - 3% * < 1% 11% * * 6% < 1% < 1% 4% * 2009 44% 12% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 15% 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 78% - 68% 86% 71% 56% * * 48% 82% 20% 71% * 2009 88% 67% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 84% 44% - 22% < 1% 29% 14% * * 14% 28% < 1% 26% * 2009 80% 27% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 83% 61% - 43% * 48% 33% * * 29% 55% 33% 48% * 2009 78% 6% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 95% 85% - 75% * 80% 67% * * 59% 89% 60% 83% * 2009 93% 71% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 77% 41% - 23% 14% 26% 21% * * 15% 29% < 1% 27% * 2009 72% 20% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard with TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 96% 83% - 70% 86% 74% 56% * * 52% 82% 20% 73% * 2009 95% 93% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 91% 52% - 30% 17% 38% 14% * * 14% 41% < 1% 37% * 2009 88% 40% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 92% 67% - 49% * 56% 33% * * 29% 65% 33% 56% * 2009 83% 41% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 99% 89% - 81% * 80% 78% * * 65% 95% 60% 83% * 2009 98% > 99% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 88% 50% - 31% 29% 37% 21% * * 15% 42% < 1% 38% * 2009 82% 40% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% 4% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * 2009 31% < 1% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 29% 2% - 2% < 1% 3% < 1% * * < 1% 3% < 1% 3% * 2009 28% 3% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 28% 3% - 3% * 4% < 1% * * < 1% 5% < 1% 4% * 2009 26% < 1% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 47% 14% - 3% * < 1% 11% * * 6% < 1% < 1% 4% * 2009 44% 12% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 15% 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * 2009 15% < 1% - * * * * * * * * * * *


Page e218

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Progress (Sum of All Grades Tested) (AEA Indicator) 2010 85% 85% - 72% 69% 73% 71% * * 66% 78% 48% 72% * 2009 81% 89% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS-M Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 85% > 99% - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 75% 78% - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 69% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 64% 80% - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 57% * - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 78% - 70% 88% 72% 56% * * 54% 82% 38% 73% * 2009 88% 68% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 84% 45% - 26% 14% 31% 14% * * 24% 28% 25% 32% * 2009 80% 26% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 82% 61% - 43% * 48% 33% * * 29% 55% 33% 48% * 2009 77% 11% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 94% 85% - 75% * 80% 67% * * 59% 89% 60% 83% * 2009 92% 72% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 76% 41% - 28% 33% 28% 21% * * 27% 29% 27% 33% * 2009 71% 19% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% 4% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Progress (Sum of All Grades Tested) (AEA Indicator) 2010 85% 85% - 72% 69% 73% 71% * * 66% 78% 48% 72% * 2009 81% 89% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS-M Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 85% > 99% - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 75% 78% - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 69% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 64% 80% - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 57% * - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 78% - 70% 88% 72% 56% * * 54% 82% 38% 73% * 2009 88% 68% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 84% 45% - 26% 14% 31% 14% * * 24% 28% 25% 32% * 2009 80% 26% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 82% 61% - 43% * 48% 33% * * 29% 55% 33% 48% * 2009 77% 11% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 94% 85% - 75% * 80% 67% * * 59% 89% 60% 83% * 2009 92% 72% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 76% 41% - 28% 33% 28% 21% * * 27% 29% 27% 33% * 2009 71% 19% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% 4% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * Mathematics 2010 28% 2% - 2% < 1% 3% < 1% * * < 1% 3% < 1% 2% *


Page e219

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP 2010 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.6% 99.7% - 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * - 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 87.0% - 87.0% 73.3% 93.3% 84.4% * - 82.0% 91.4% 12.5% 84.1% - Not on TAKS 7.8% 12.7% - 13.0% 26.7% 6.7% 15.6% * - 18.0% 8.6% 87.5% 15.9% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 8.8% - 7.4% 13.3% 3.3% 12.5% * - 10.0% 5.2% 50.0% 7.2% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 2.9% - 4.6% 13.3% 1.7% 3.1% * - 8.0% 1.7% 31.3% 7.2% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 1.0% - 0.9% 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% * - 0.0% 1.7% 6.3% 1.4% - By Acct Status Acct System 90.0% 58.4% - 58.3% 46.7% 63.3% 56.3% * - 50.0% 65.5% 62.5% 65.2% - Non-Acct System 8.6% 41.3% - 41.7% 53.3% 36.7% 43.8% * - 50.0% 34.5% 37.5% 34.8% - Mobile 4.4% 38.4% - 37.0% 40.0% 35.0% 40.6% * - 42.0% 32.8% 6.3% 27.5% - Non-Acct Test 4.2% 2.9% - 4.6% 13.3% 1.7% 3.1% * - 8.0% 1.7% 31.3% 7.2% - Not Tested 1.4% 0.3% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 0.3% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Total Count 3,175,337 385 - 108 15 60 32 1 0 50 58 16 69 0 Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers Percent of Failers Passing TAKS (Sum of Grades 4-11) Reading/ELA 2010 57% 49% - 29% * * * * * 20% * * * * 2009 43% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 43% 38% - 17% * 22% 13% * * 13% 20% < 1% 21% * 2009 36% < 1% - * * * * * * * * * * * Attendance Rate 2008-09 95.6% 88.4% - 87.0% 83.9% 87.6% 86.9% * - 88.0% 86.3% 84.7% 86.9% - 2007-08 95.5% 89.4% - - - - - - - - - - - - Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 7-12) (AEA Indicator) 2008-09 2.0% 13.8% - 19.1% 43.8% 20.6% 12.2% * - 17.9% 20.2% 11.1% 21.0% - 2007-08 2.2% 8.5% - - - - - - - - - - - - COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 10.4% - 21.0% 13.3% 18.6% 26.2% * - 18.1% 23.2% 12.5% 18.0% - 2007-08 23.1% 9.3% - - - - - - - - - - - - RHSP/DAP Graduates Class of 2009 82.5% 70.1% - 89.7% * 86.7% 92.3% - - 90.9% 88.9% - 90.9% -

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP 2010 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.6% 99.7% - 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * - 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 87.0% - 87.0% 73.3% 93.3% 84.4% * - 82.0% 91.4% 12.5% 84.1% - Not on TAKS 7.8% 12.7% - 13.0% 26.7% 6.7% 15.6% * - 18.0% 8.6% 87.5% 15.9% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 8.8% - 7.4% 13.3% 3.3% 12.5% * - 10.0% 5.2% 50.0% 7.2% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 2.9% - 4.6% 13.3% 1.7% 3.1% * - 8.0% 1.7% 31.3% 7.2% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 1.0% - 0.9% 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% * - 0.0% 1.7% 6.3% 1.4% - By Acct Status Acct System 90.0% 58.4% - 58.3% 46.7% 63.3% 56.3% * - 50.0% 65.5% 62.5% 65.2% - Non-Acct System 8.6% 41.3% - 41.7% 53.3% 36.7% 43.8% * - 50.0% 34.5% 37.5% 34.8% - Mobile 4.4% 38.4% - 37.0% 40.0% 35.0% 40.6% * - 42.0% 32.8% 6.3% 27.5% - Non-Acct Test 4.2% 2.9% - 4.6% 13.3% 1.7% 3.1% * - 8.0% 1.7% 31.3% 7.2% - Not Tested 1.4% 0.3% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 0.3% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Total Count 3,175,337 385 - 108 15 60 32 1 0 50 58 16 69 0 Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers Percent of Failers Passing TAKS (Sum of Grades 4-11) Reading/ELA 2010 57% 49% - 29% * * * * * 20% * * * * 2009 43% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 43% 38% - 17% * 22% 13% * * 13% 20% < 1% 21% * 2009 36% < 1% - * * * * * * * * * * * Attendance Rate 2008-09 95.6% 88.4% - 87.0% 83.9% 87.6% 86.9% * - 88.0% 86.3% 84.7% 86.9% - 2007-08 95.5% 89.4% - - - - - - - - - - - - Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 7-12) (AEA Indicator) 2008-09 2.0% 13.8% - 19.1% 43.8% 20.6% 12.2% * - 17.9% 20.2% 11.1% 21.0% - 2007-08 2.2% 8.5% - - - - - - - - - - - - COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 10.4% - 21.0% 13.3% 18.6% 26.2% * - 18.1% 23.2% 12.5% 18.0% - 2007-08 23.1% 9.3% - - - - - - - - - - - - RHSP/DAP Graduates Class of 2009 82.5% 70.1% - 89.7% * 86.7% 92.3% - - 90.9% 88.9% - 90.9% - Class of 2008 81.4% 57.1% - - - - - - - - - - - -


Page e220

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 5 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP AP/IB Results Tested 2009 21.2% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a 2008 20.9% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Examinees >= Criterion 2009 51.2% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 50.1% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Scores >= Criterion 2009 47.4% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 46.0% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Texas Success Initiative (TSI) – Higher Education Readiness Component Eng Lang Arts 2010 60% 24% - 9% * 14% < 1% * * < 1% 17% * 9% * 2009 63% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 66% 16% - 7% * 10% < 1% * * 7% 7% * 5% * 2009 62% * - * * * * * * * * * * * College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% 30% - 20% * 40% 11% * * < 1% 33% * 60% * Class of 2008 59% 21% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% 15% - 7% * < 1% 11% * * 20% < 1% * < 1% * Class of 2008 58% 8% - * * * * * * * * * * * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% 6% - < 1% * < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 5 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP AP/IB Results Tested 2009 21.2% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a 2008 20.9% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Examinees >= Criterion 2009 51.2% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 50.1% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Scores >= Criterion 2009 47.4% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 46.0% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Texas Success Initiative (TSI) – Higher Education Readiness Component Eng Lang Arts 2010 60% 24% - 9% * 14% < 1% * * < 1% 17% * 9% * 2009 63% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 66% 16% - 7% * 10% < 1% * * 7% 7% * 5% * 2009 62% * - * * * * * * * * * * * College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% 30% - 20% * 40% 11% * * < 1% 33% * 60% * Class of 2008 59% 21% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% 15% - 7% * < 1% 11% * * 20% < 1% * < 1% * Class of 2008 58% 8% - * * * * * * * * * * * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% 6% - < 1% * < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% * Class of 2008 44% 8% - * * * * * * * * * * *


Page e221

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Students: 141 100.0% - 477 4,824,778 Students By Grade: Early Childhood Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Pre-Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 4.4% Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 1 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.9% Grade 2 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.8% Grade 3 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.7% Grade 4 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 5 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.5% Grade 6 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 7 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 8 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.2% Grade 9 28 19.9% - 13.8% 8.1% Grade 10 34 24.1% - 18.9% 6.9% Grade 11 53 37.6% - 35.2% 6.4% Grade 12 26 18.4% - 32.1% 5.9% Ethnic Distribution: African American 15 10.6% - 7.3% 14.0% Hispanic 71 50.4% - 56.0% 48.6% White 54 38.3% - 36.3% 33.3% Native American 1 0.7% - 0.2% 0.4% Asian/Pac. Islander 0 0.0% - 0.2% 3.7% Economically Disadvantaged 88 62.4% - 73.8% 59.0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.9% Students w/Disciplinary Placements (2008-09) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 13.4% At-Risk 126 89.4% - 89.1% 47.2% Mobility (2008-09) 114 61.6% - 68.8% 18.9%

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Students: 141 100.0% - 477 4,824,778 Students By Grade: Early Childhood Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Pre-Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 4.4% Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 1 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.9% Grade 2 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.8% Grade 3 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.7% Grade 4 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 5 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.5% Grade 6 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 7 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 8 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.2% Grade 9 28 19.9% - 13.8% 8.1% Grade 10 34 24.1% - 18.9% 6.9% Grade 11 53 37.6% - 35.2% 6.4% Grade 12 26 18.4% - 32.1% 5.9% Ethnic Distribution: African American 15 10.6% - 7.3% 14.0% Hispanic 71 50.4% - 56.0% 48.6% White 54 38.3% - 36.3% 33.3% Native American 1 0.7% - 0.2% 0.4% Asian/Pac. Islander 0 0.0% - 0.2% 3.7% Economically Disadvantaged 88 62.4% - 73.8% 59.0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.9% Students w/Disciplinary Placements (2008-09) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 13.4% At-Risk 126 89.4% - 89.1% 47.2% Mobility (2008-09) 114 61.6% - 68.8% 18.9% Number of Students per Teacher 20.5 n/a - 21.8 14.5


Page e222

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Graduates (Class of 2009): Count Percent Group District State Total Graduates 29 100.0% - 154 264,275 By Ethnicity (incl. Special Ed.): African American 1 3.4% - 3 35,982 Hispanic 15 51.7% - 83 104,854 White 13 44.8% - 68 112,016 Native American 0 0.0% - 0 961 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0.0% - 0 10,462 By Graduation Type (incl. Special Ed.): Minimum H.S. Program 3 10.3% - 46 46,313 Recommended H.S. Pgm./DAP 26 89.7% - 108 217,962 Special Education Graduates 0 0.0% - 9 25,929 CLASS SIZE INFORMATION (Derived from teacher responsibility records.) Campus Class Size Averages by Grade and Subject: Campus Group District State Elementary: Kindergarten - - - 19.3 Grade 1 - - - 19.1 Grade 2 - - - 19.2 Grade 3 - - - 19.3 Grade 4 - - - 19.9 Grade 5 - - - 22.4 Grade 6 - - - 21.1 Mixed Grades - - - 24.7 Secondary: English/Language Arts 6.7 - 7.8 17.8 Foreign Languages 4.2 - 4.3 19.4 Mathematics 9.3 - 10.2 18.5 Science 10.0 - 8.9 19.3

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Graduates (Class of 2009): Count Percent Group District State Total Graduates 29 100.0% - 154 264,275 By Ethnicity (incl. Special Ed.): African American 1 3.4% - 3 35,982 Hispanic 15 51.7% - 83 104,854 White 13 44.8% - 68 112,016 Native American 0 0.0% - 0 961 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0.0% - 0 10,462 By Graduation Type (incl. Special Ed.): Minimum H.S. Program 3 10.3% - 46 46,313 Recommended H.S. Pgm./DAP 26 89.7% - 108 217,962 Special Education Graduates 0 0.0% - 9 25,929 CLASS SIZE INFORMATION (Derived from teacher responsibility records.) Campus Class Size Averages by Grade and Subject: Campus Group District State Elementary: Kindergarten - - - 19.3 Grade 1 - - - 19.1 Grade 2 - - - 19.2 Grade 3 - - - 19.3 Grade 4 - - - 19.9 Grade 5 - - - 22.4 Grade 6 - - - 21.1 Mixed Grades - - - 24.7 Secondary: English/Language Arts 6.7 - 7.8 17.8 Foreign Languages 4.2 - 4.3 19.4 Mathematics 9.3 - 10.2 18.5 Science 10.0 - 8.9 19.3 Social Studies 7.1 - 7.0 20.4


Page e223

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STAFF INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Staff: 8.6 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% Professional Staff: 7.9 91.8% - 63.0% 63.2% Teachers 6.9 80.2% - 50.0% 50.5% Professional Support 1.0 11.7% - 8.5% 8.9% Campus Admin. (School Leader.) 0.0 0.0% - 4.6% 2.8% Educational Aides: 0.7 8.2% - 15.4% 9.8% Total Minority Staff: 2.0 23.3% - 24.4% 43.9% Teachers By Ethnicity and Sex: African American 2.0 29.1% - 9.1% 9.5% Hispanic 0.0 0.0% - 19.1% 22.5% White 4.9 70.9% - 71.7% 66.4% Native American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 1.3% Males 0.0 0.0% - 12.9% 23.0% Females 6.9 100.0% - 87.1% 77.0% Teachers by Years of Experience: Beginning Teachers 0.0 0.0% - 12.8% 6.0% 1-5 Years Experience 1.0 14.5% - 22.9% 31.0% 6-10 Years Experience 4.9 70.9% - 37.0% 20.3% 11-20 Years Experience 1.0 14.5% - 9.1% 24.4% 0ver 20 Years Experience 0.0 0.0% - 18.3% 18.3% Campus Campus Group District State Average Years Experience of Teachers: 8.0 yrs. - yrs. 11.1 yrs. 11.3 yrs. Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 5.2 yrs. - yrs. 4.4 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers - - $29,913 $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $36,228 - $39,474 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $49,162 - $47,539 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience $48,996 - $45,181 $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience - - $43,473 $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $47,257 - $42,489 $48,263 Professional Support $50,561 - $47,479 $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) - - $71,567 $70,209

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STAFF INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Staff: 8.6 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% Professional Staff: 7.9 91.8% - 63.0% 63.2% Teachers 6.9 80.2% - 50.0% 50.5% Professional Support 1.0 11.7% - 8.5% 8.9% Campus Admin. (School Leader.) 0.0 0.0% - 4.6% 2.8% Educational Aides: 0.7 8.2% - 15.4% 9.8% Total Minority Staff: 2.0 23.3% - 24.4% 43.9% Teachers By Ethnicity and Sex: African American 2.0 29.1% - 9.1% 9.5% Hispanic 0.0 0.0% - 19.1% 22.5% White 4.9 70.9% - 71.7% 66.4% Native American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 1.3% Males 0.0 0.0% - 12.9% 23.0% Females 6.9 100.0% - 87.1% 77.0% Teachers by Years of Experience: Beginning Teachers 0.0 0.0% - 12.8% 6.0% 1-5 Years Experience 1.0 14.5% - 22.9% 31.0% 6-10 Years Experience 4.9 70.9% - 37.0% 20.3% 11-20 Years Experience 1.0 14.5% - 9.1% 24.4% 0ver 20 Years Experience 0.0 0.0% - 18.3% 18.3% Campus Campus Group District State Average Years Experience of Teachers: 8.0 yrs. - yrs. 11.1 yrs. 11.3 yrs. Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 5.2 yrs. - yrs. 4.4 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers - - $29,913 $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $36,228 - $39,474 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $49,162 - $47,539 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience $48,996 - $45,181 $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience - - $43,473 $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $47,257 - $42,489 $48,263 Professional Support $50,561 - $47,479 $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) - - $71,567 $70,209 Contracted Instructional Staff (not incl. above): 0.0 - 0.0 1,722.9


Page e224

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE INFORMATION |---------------------------Campus---------------------------| |---------Campus Group---------| (2008-09) General Percent Per All Percent Per All Percent Per Fund Student Funds Student Funds Student By Function: Total Operating Expenditures $269,999 100.0% $2,160 $299,357 100.0% $2,395 - - - Instruction (11,95) $126,875 47.0% $1,015 $143,286 47.9% $1,146 - - - Instructional-Related Services (12,13) $4,839 1.8% $39 $17,561 5.9% $140 - - - Instructional Leadership (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - School Leadership (23) $52,659 19.5% $421 $52,659 17.6% $421 - - - Support Services-Student (31,32,33) $29,830 11.0% $239 $29,830 10.0% $239 - - - Other Campus Costs (35,36,51,52,53) $55,796 20.7% $446 $56,021 18.7% $448 - - - By Program: Total Operating Expenditures $214,203 100.0% $1,714 $243,336 100.0% $1,947 - - - Bilingual/ESL Education (25) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Career & Technical Education (22) $8,312 3.9% $66 $8,312 3.4% $66 - - - Accelerated Education (24,30) $9,569 4.5% $77 $37,187 15.3% $297 - - - Gifted & Talented Education (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Regular Education (11) $178,001 83.1% $1,424 $179,516 73.8% $1,436 - - - Special Education (23) $18,321 8.6% $147 $18,321 7.5% $147 - - - Other (26,28,29) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Student Enrollment by Program: Bilingual/ESL Education 0 0.0% - 1.3% 16.1% Career & Technical Education 31 22.0% - 36.3% 21.3% Gifted & Talented Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Special Education 14 9.9% - 12.6% 9.0% Teachers by Program (population served): Bilingual/ESL Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.0% Career & Technical Education 0.6 8.3% - 8.9% 3.9% Compensatory Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.4% Gifted & Talented Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 2.0% Regular Education 6.3 91.7% - 86.6% 71.0% Special Education 0.0 0.0% - 4.6% 9.6% Other 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.0% '^' Primary Spring Administration, plus October first-time 11th grade testers who pass all 4 tests in October. '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 141 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (M 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801002 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE INFORMATION |---------------------------Campus---------------------------| |---------Campus Group---------| (2008-09) General Percent Per All Percent Per All Percent Per Fund Student Funds Student Funds Student By Function: Total Operating Expenditures $269,999 100.0% $2,160 $299,357 100.0% $2,395 - - - Instruction (11,95) $126,875 47.0% $1,015 $143,286 47.9% $1,146 - - - Instructional-Related Services (12,13) $4,839 1.8% $39 $17,561 5.9% $140 - - - Instructional Leadership (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - School Leadership (23) $52,659 19.5% $421 $52,659 17.6% $421 - - - Support Services-Student (31,32,33) $29,830 11.0% $239 $29,830 10.0% $239 - - - Other Campus Costs (35,36,51,52,53) $55,796 20.7% $446 $56,021 18.7% $448 - - - By Program: Total Operating Expenditures $214,203 100.0% $1,714 $243,336 100.0% $1,947 - - - Bilingual/ESL Education (25) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Career & Technical Education (22) $8,312 3.9% $66 $8,312 3.4% $66 - - - Accelerated Education (24,30) $9,569 4.5% $77 $37,187 15.3% $297 - - - Gifted & Talented Education (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Regular Education (11) $178,001 83.1% $1,424 $179,516 73.8% $1,436 - - - Special Education (23) $18,321 8.6% $147 $18,321 7.5% $147 - - - Other (26,28,29) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Student Enrollment by Program: Bilingual/ESL Education 0 0.0% - 1.3% 16.1% Career & Technical Education 31 22.0% - 36.3% 21.3% Gifted & Talented Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Special Education 14 9.9% - 12.6% 9.0% Teachers by Program (population served): Bilingual/ESL Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.0% Career & Technical Education 0.6 8.3% - 8.9% 3.9% Compensatory Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.4% Gifted & Talented Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 2.0% Regular Education 6.3 91.7% - 86.6% 71.0% Special Education 0.0 0.0% - 4.6% 9.6% Other 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.0% '^' Primary Spring Administration, plus October first-time 11th grade testers who pass all 4 tests in October. '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.


Page e225

U282M110023 0023

2009-10 Academic Excellence Indicator System District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (ECTOR COU Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - ECTOR CO Campus #: 068801001 2010 Accountability Rating: AEA: Academically Acceptable This is a Charter School.


Page e226

U282M110023 0023



Page e227

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 9 Reading 2010 92% 78% - 82% * 78% * * * 80% 86% * 80% * 2009 88% 69% - 69% * 57% 83% * * * 60% * 60% * Mathematics 2010 72% 30% - 43% * 35% * * * 43% 43% * 37% * 2009 69% 38% - 38% * 29% 50% * * * 40% * 30% * All Tests 2010 71% 35% - 45% * 39% * * * 47% 43% * 40% * 2009 67% 38% - 38% * 29% 50% * * * 40% * 30% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 10 Eng Lang Arts 2010 91% 73% - 88% * 80% > 99% * * 75% > 99% * 82% * 2009 88% 65% - 65% * 60% * * * * 69% * 62% * Mathematics 2010 75% 45% - 41% * 36% 50% * * 44% 38% * 36% * 2009 67% 18% - 18% * 13% * * * * 23% * 15% * Science 2010 75% 43% - 47% * 36% 67% * * 44% 50% * 45% * 2009 67% 6% - 6% * < 1% * * * * 8% * < 1% * Soc Studies 2010 93% 77% - 82% * 82% 83% * * 78% 88% * 91% * 2009 91% 71% - 71% * 67% * * * * 77% * 69% * All Tests 2010 66% 30% - 35% * 27% 50% * * 33% 38% * 27% * 2009 56% 6% - 6% * < 1% * * * * 8% * < 1% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard ^ Grade 11 Eng Lang Arts 2010 93% 79% - 84% * 85% 88% * * 79% 88% 50% 83% * 2009 93% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 89% 49% - 58% * 58% 60% * * 59% 57% 25% 57% * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 92% 68% - 72% * 66% 93% * * 86% 63% 50% 66% * 2009 86% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 98% 88% - 89% * 88% > 99% * * 95% 86% 75% 87% * 2009 97% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 83% 46% - 54% * 54% 59% * * 54% 55% 21% 50% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 9 Reading 2010 92% 78% - 82% * 78% * * * 80% 86% * 80% * 2009 88% 69% - 69% * 57% 83% * * * 60% * 60% * Mathematics 2010 72% 30% - 43% * 35% * * * 43% 43% * 37% * 2009 69% 38% - 38% * 29% 50% * * * 40% * 30% * All Tests 2010 71% 35% - 45% * 39% * * * 47% 43% * 40% * 2009 67% 38% - 38% * 29% 50% * * * 40% * 30% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 10 Eng Lang Arts 2010 91% 73% - 88% * 80% > 99% * * 75% > 99% * 82% * 2009 88% 65% - 65% * 60% * * * * 69% * 62% * Mathematics 2010 75% 45% - 41% * 36% 50% * * 44% 38% * 36% * 2009 67% 18% - 18% * 13% * * * * 23% * 15% * Science 2010 75% 43% - 47% * 36% 67% * * 44% 50% * 45% * 2009 67% 6% - 6% * < 1% * * * * 8% * < 1% * Soc Studies 2010 93% 77% - 82% * 82% 83% * * 78% 88% * 91% * 2009 91% 71% - 71% * 67% * * * * 77% * 69% * All Tests 2010 66% 30% - 35% * 27% 50% * * 33% 38% * 27% * 2009 56% 6% - 6% * < 1% * * * * 8% * < 1% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard ^ Grade 11 Eng Lang Arts 2010 93% 79% - 84% * 85% 88% * * 79% 88% 50% 83% * 2009 93% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 89% 49% - 58% * 58% 60% * * 59% 57% 25% 57% * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 92% 68% - 72% * 66% 93% * * 86% 63% 50% 66% * 2009 86% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 98% 88% - 89% * 88% > 99% * * 95% 86% 75% 87% * 2009 97% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 83% 46% - 54% * 54% 59% * * 54% 55% 21% 50% * 2009 76% * - * * * * * * * * * * *


Page e228

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 78% - 84% * 83% 92% * * 79% 89% 39% 82% * 2009 88% 67% - 67% * 59% 88% * * 71% 65% 40% 61% * Mathematics 2010 84% 44% - 52% * 49% 60% * * 51% 52% 19% 49% * 2009 80% 27% - 27% * 18% 50% * * 14% 30% < 1% 22% * Science 2010 83% 61% - 66% * 60% 86% * * 74% 61% 46% 62% * 2009 78% 6% - 6% * < 1% * * * * 8% * < 1% * Soc Studies 2010 95% 85% - 88% * 87% 95% * * 90% 86% 69% 88% * 2009 93% 71% - 71% * 67% * * * * 77% * 69% * All Tests 2010 77% 41% - 50% * 47% 59% * * 48% 51% 17% 45% * 2009 72% 20% - 20% * 9% 50% * * 14% 22% < 1% 13% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard with TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 96% 83% - 88% * 88% 92% * * 85% 91% 50% 87% * 2009 95% 93% - 93% * 91% > 99% * * > 99% 91% 80% 91% * Mathematics 2010 91% 52% - 60% * 58% 68% * * 64% 56% 19% 59% * 2009 88% 40% - 40% * 32% 63% * * 57% 35% 20% 35% * Science 2010 92% 67% - 71% * 65% 90% * * 84% 63% 46% 69% * 2009 83% 41% - 41% * 33% * * * * 38% * 46% * Soc Studies 2010 99% 89% - 91% * 89% > 99% * * 93% 89% 77% 90% * 2009 98% > 99% - > 99% * > 99% * * * * > 99% * > 99% * All Tests 2010 88% 50% - 58% * 56% 67% * * 62% 54% 17% 55% * 2009 82% 40% - 40% * 32% 63% * * 57% 35% 20% 35% * TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% 4% - 6% * 4% 12% * * 4% 7% < 1% 5% * 2009 31% < 1% - < 1% * < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * Mathematics 2010 29% 2% - 1% * < 1% 4% * * 2% < 1% < 1% 1% * 2009 28% 3% - 3% * < 1% 13% * * < 1% 4% < 1% < 1% * Science 2010 28% 3% - < 1% * < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * 2009 26% < 1% - < 1% * < 1% * * * * < 1% * < 1% * Soc Studies 2010 47% 14% - 12% * 6% 30% * * 17% 9% < 1% 7% * 2009 44% 12% - 12% * 7% * * * * 8% * 8% * All Tests 2010 15% 1% - 1% * 1% < 1% * * < 1% 2% < 1% 1% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 78% - 84% * 83% 92% * * 79% 89% 39% 82% * 2009 88% 67% - 67% * 59% 88% * * 71% 65% 40% 61% * Mathematics 2010 84% 44% - 52% * 49% 60% * * 51% 52% 19% 49% * 2009 80% 27% - 27% * 18% 50% * * 14% 30% < 1% 22% * Science 2010 83% 61% - 66% * 60% 86% * * 74% 61% 46% 62% * 2009 78% 6% - 6% * < 1% * * * * 8% * < 1% * Soc Studies 2010 95% 85% - 88% * 87% 95% * * 90% 86% 69% 88% * 2009 93% 71% - 71% * 67% * * * * 77% * 69% * All Tests 2010 77% 41% - 50% * 47% 59% * * 48% 51% 17% 45% * 2009 72% 20% - 20% * 9% 50% * * 14% 22% < 1% 13% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard with TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 96% 83% - 88% * 88% 92% * * 85% 91% 50% 87% * 2009 95% 93% - 93% * 91% > 99% * * > 99% 91% 80% 91% * Mathematics 2010 91% 52% - 60% * 58% 68% * * 64% 56% 19% 59% * 2009 88% 40% - 40% * 32% 63% * * 57% 35% 20% 35% * Science 2010 92% 67% - 71% * 65% 90% * * 84% 63% 46% 69% * 2009 83% 41% - 41% * 33% * * * * 38% * 46% * Soc Studies 2010 99% 89% - 91% * 89% > 99% * * 93% 89% 77% 90% * 2009 98% > 99% - > 99% * > 99% * * * * > 99% * > 99% * All Tests 2010 88% 50% - 58% * 56% 67% * * 62% 54% 17% 55% * 2009 82% 40% - 40% * 32% 63% * * 57% 35% 20% 35% * TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% 4% - 6% * 4% 12% * * 4% 7% < 1% 5% * 2009 31% < 1% - < 1% * < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * Mathematics 2010 29% 2% - 1% * < 1% 4% * * 2% < 1% < 1% 1% * 2009 28% 3% - 3% * < 1% 13% * * < 1% 4% < 1% < 1% * Science 2010 28% 3% - < 1% * < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * 2009 26% < 1% - < 1% * < 1% * * * * < 1% * < 1% * Soc Studies 2010 47% 14% - 12% * 6% 30% * * 17% 9% < 1% 7% * 2009 44% 12% - 12% * 7% * * * * 8% * 8% * All Tests 2010 15% 1% - 1% * 1% < 1% * * < 1% 2% < 1% 1% * 2009 15% < 1% - < 1% * < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% *


Page e229

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Progress (Sum of All Grades Tested) (AEA Indicator) 2010 85% 85% - 89% * 87% 95% * * 91% 88% 74% 88% * 2009 81% 89% - 89% * 86% 96% * * 95% 85% 70% 87% * TAKS-M Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 85% > 99% - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 75% 78% - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 69% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 58% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 51% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 67% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 64% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 64% 80% - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 57% * - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 78% - 84% * 83% 93% * * 79% 89% 42% 82% * 2009 88% 68% - 68% * 59% 89% * * 75% 65% 50% 63% * Mathematics 2010 84% 45% - 51% * 49% 58% * * 50% 52% 18% 49% * 2009 80% 26% - 26% * 18% 44% * * 13% 30% < 1% 21% * Science 2010 82% 61% - 65% * 60% 82% * * 72% 61% 43% 61% * 2009 77% 11% - 11% * < 1% * * * 20% 8% 20% 7% * Soc Studies 2010 94% 85% - 88% * 87% 95% * * 90% 86% 71% 88% * 2009 92% 72% - 72% * 67% * * * 60% 77% 60% 71% * All Tests 2010 76% 41% - 49% * 47% 57% * * 47% 51% 16% 44% * 2009 71% 19% - 19% * 9% 44% * * 13% 22% < 1% 13% * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% 4% - 6% * 4% 11% * * 4% 7% < 1% 5% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Progress (Sum of All Grades Tested) (AEA Indicator) 2010 85% 85% - 89% * 87% 95% * * 91% 88% 74% 88% * 2009 81% 89% - 89% * 86% 96% * * 95% 85% 70% 87% * TAKS-M Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 85% > 99% - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 75% 78% - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 69% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 58% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 51% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 67% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 64% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 64% 80% - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 57% * - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 78% - 84% * 83% 93% * * 79% 89% 42% 82% * 2009 88% 68% - 68% * 59% 89% * * 75% 65% 50% 63% * Mathematics 2010 84% 45% - 51% * 49% 58% * * 50% 52% 18% 49% * 2009 80% 26% - 26% * 18% 44% * * 13% 30% < 1% 21% * Science 2010 82% 61% - 65% * 60% 82% * * 72% 61% 43% 61% * 2009 77% 11% - 11% * < 1% * * * 20% 8% 20% 7% * Soc Studies 2010 94% 85% - 88% * 87% 95% * * 90% 86% 71% 88% * 2009 92% 72% - 72% * 67% * * * 60% 77% 60% 71% * All Tests 2010 76% 41% - 49% * 47% 57% * * 47% 51% 16% 44% * 2009 71% 19% - 19% * 9% 44% * * 13% 22% < 1% 13% * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% 4% - 6% * 4% 11% * * 4% 7% < 1% 5% * Mathematics 2010 28% 2% - 1% * < 1% 4% * * 2% < 1% < 1% 1% *


Page e230

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP 2010 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.6% 99.7% - 99.3% * 99.1% 100.0% - - 98.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 87.0% - 87.5% * 85.2% 93.0% - - 78.5% 94.3% 14.3% 87.3% - Not on TAKS 7.8% 12.7% - 11.8% * 13.9% 7.0% - - 20.0% 5.7% 85.7% 12.7% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 8.8% - 11.2% * 13.9% 4.7% - - 18.5% 5.7% 81.0% 11.9% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 2.9% - 0.7% * 0.0% 2.3% - - 1.5% 0.0% 4.8% 0.8% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 1.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - By Acct Status Acct System 90.0% 58.4% - 68.4% * 70.4% 62.8% - - 73.8% 64.4% 85.7% 71.2% - Non-Acct System 8.6% 41.3% - 30.9% * 28.7% 37.2% - - 24.6% 35.6% 14.3% 28.8% - Mobile 4.4% 38.4% - 30.3% * 28.7% 34.9% - - 23.1% 35.6% 9.5% 28.0% - Non-Acct Test 4.2% 2.9% - 0.7% * 0.0% 2.3% - - 1.5% 0.0% 4.8% 0.8% - Not Tested 1.4% 0.3% - 0.7% * 0.9% 0.0% - - 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 0.3% - 0.7% * 0.9% 0.0% - - 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Total Count 3,175,337 385 - 152 1 108 43 0 0 65 87 21 118 0 2009 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.5% 100.0% - 100.0% * 100.0% 100.0% - - 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 82.4% - 82.4% * 81.3% 84.2% - - 67.9% 92.5% 20.0% 82.4% - Not on TAKS 7.7% 17.6% - 17.6% * 18.8% 15.8% - - 32.1% 7.5% 80.0% 17.6% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 16.2% - 16.2% * 18.8% 10.5% - - 28.6% 7.5% 73.3% 15.7% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 1.5% - 1.5% * 0.0% 5.3% - - 3.6% 0.0% 6.7% 2.0% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - By Acct Status Acct System 87.3% 42.6% - 42.6% * 45.8% 36.8% - - 21.4% 57.5% 26.7% 45.1% - Non-Acct System 11.2% 57.4% - 57.4% * 54.2% 63.2% - - 78.6% 42.5% 73.3% 54.9% - Mobile 4.7% 52.9% - 52.9% * 52.1% 52.6% - - 67.9% 42.5% 53.3% 51.0% - Non-Acct Test 6.4% 4.4% - 4.4% * 2.1% 10.5% - - 10.7% 0.0% 20.0% 3.9% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Not Tested 1.5% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP 2010 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.6% 99.7% - 99.3% * 99.1% 100.0% - - 98.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 87.0% - 87.5% * 85.2% 93.0% - - 78.5% 94.3% 14.3% 87.3% - Not on TAKS 7.8% 12.7% - 11.8% * 13.9% 7.0% - - 20.0% 5.7% 85.7% 12.7% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 8.8% - 11.2% * 13.9% 4.7% - - 18.5% 5.7% 81.0% 11.9% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 2.9% - 0.7% * 0.0% 2.3% - - 1.5% 0.0% 4.8% 0.8% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 1.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - By Acct Status Acct System 90.0% 58.4% - 68.4% * 70.4% 62.8% - - 73.8% 64.4% 85.7% 71.2% - Non-Acct System 8.6% 41.3% - 30.9% * 28.7% 37.2% - - 24.6% 35.6% 14.3% 28.8% - Mobile 4.4% 38.4% - 30.3% * 28.7% 34.9% - - 23.1% 35.6% 9.5% 28.0% - Non-Acct Test 4.2% 2.9% - 0.7% * 0.0% 2.3% - - 1.5% 0.0% 4.8% 0.8% - Not Tested 1.4% 0.3% - 0.7% * 0.9% 0.0% - - 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 0.3% - 0.7% * 0.9% 0.0% - - 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Total Count 3,175,337 385 - 152 1 108 43 0 0 65 87 21 118 0 2009 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.5% 100.0% - 100.0% * 100.0% 100.0% - - 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 82.4% - 82.4% * 81.3% 84.2% - - 67.9% 92.5% 20.0% 82.4% - Not on TAKS 7.7% 17.6% - 17.6% * 18.8% 15.8% - - 32.1% 7.5% 80.0% 17.6% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 16.2% - 16.2% * 18.8% 10.5% - - 28.6% 7.5% 73.3% 15.7% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 1.5% - 1.5% * 0.0% 5.3% - - 3.6% 0.0% 6.7% 2.0% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - By Acct Status Acct System 87.3% 42.6% - 42.6% * 45.8% 36.8% - - 21.4% 57.5% 26.7% 45.1% - Non-Acct System 11.2% 57.4% - 57.4% * 54.2% 63.2% - - 78.6% 42.5% 73.3% 54.9% - Mobile 4.7% 52.9% - 52.9% * 52.1% 52.6% - - 67.9% 42.5% 53.3% 51.0% - Non-Acct Test 6.4% 4.4% - 4.4% * 2.1% 10.5% - - 10.7% 0.0% 20.0% 3.9% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Not Tested 1.5% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Count 3,132,150 68 - 68 1 48 19 0 0 28 40 15 51 0


Page e231

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 5 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers Percent of Failers Passing TAKS (Sum of Grades 4-11) Reading/ELA 2010 57% 49% - 60% * 60% * * * 55% 67% 36% 59% * 2009 43% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 43% 38% - 41% * 39% 50% * * 52% 31% 27% 43% * 2009 36% < 1% - < 1% * < 1% * * * * < 1% * < 1% * Attendance Rate 2008-09 95.6% 88.4% - 91.6% * 91.8% 91.0% * - 93.0% 90.5% 94.1% 91.6% - 2007-08 95.5% 89.4% - 89.4% * 89.6% 88.6% * - 90.8% 88.2% 92.3% 89.8% - Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 7-12) (AEA Indicator) 2008-09 2.0% 13.8% - 6.9% 0.0% 5.3% 11.1% * - 9.0% 5.3% 6.3% 4.8% - 2007-08 2.2% 8.5% - 8.5% 0.0% 9.2% 8.3% * - 11.6% 6.2% 9.1% 7.6% - 4-Year Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2009 Graduated 80.6% 37.1% - 49.0% * 49.3% 51.5% - - 44.6% 54.2% 33.3% 67.5% - Received GED 1.4% 6.6% - 3.8% * 4.3% 3.0% - - 5.4% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% - Continued HS 8.6% 22.5% - 30.8% * 30.4% 27.3% - - 30.4% 31.3% 33.3% 15.0% - Dropped Out 9.4% 33.8% - 16.3% * 15.9% 18.2% - - 19.6% 12.5% 33.3% 17.5% - Class of 2008 Graduated 79.1% 30.3% - 27.4% * 22.7% 38.5% * - 23.0% 32.1% 33.3% 16.7% * Received GED 1.5% 4.9% - 2.6% * 0.0% 7.7% * - 3.3% 1.8% 0.0% 3.0% * Continued HS 8.9% 29.2% - 38.5% * 46.7% 20.5% * - 36.1% 41.1% 33.3% 45.5% * Dropped Out 10.5% 35.6% - 31.6% * 30.7% 33.3% * - 37.7% 25.0% 33.3% 34.8% * 5-Year Extended Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2008 Graduated 83.4% 41.8% - 38.1% * 38.0% 38.5% * - 35.1% 41.1% 50.0% 33.3% - Received GED 2.1% 6.7% - 3.5% * 1.4% 7.7% * - 3.5% 3.6% 0.0% 5.0% - Continued HS 2.4% 11.9% - 23.0% * 28.2% 12.8% * - 14.0% 32.1% 16.7% 23.3% - Dropped Out 12.2% 39.6% - 35.4% * 32.4% 41.0% * - 47.4% 23.2% 33.3% 38.3% - Completion Rate II (Graduates, Continuers, and GED) (AEA Indicator) Class of 2009 90.6% 66.2% - 83.7% * 84.1% 81.8% - - 80.4% 87.5% 66.7% 82.5% - Class of 2008 89.5% 64.4% - 68.4% * 69.3% 66.7% * - 62.3% 75.0% 66.7% 65.2% * Completion Rate I (Graduates and Continuers) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Class of 2009 89.2% 59.6% - 79.8% * 79.7% 78.8% - - 75.0% 85.4% 66.7% 82.5% - Class of 2008 88.0% 59.6% - 65.8% * 69.3% 59.0% * - 59.0% 73.2% 66.7% 62.1% * COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 10.4% - 10.7% 16.7% 9.4% 12.2% * - 9.8% 11.5% 7.4% 14.7% -

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 5 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers Percent of Failers Passing TAKS (Sum of Grades 4-11) Reading/ELA 2010 57% 49% - 60% * 60% * * * 55% 67% 36% 59% * 2009 43% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 43% 38% - 41% * 39% 50% * * 52% 31% 27% 43% * 2009 36% < 1% - < 1% * < 1% * * * * < 1% * < 1% * Attendance Rate 2008-09 95.6% 88.4% - 91.6% * 91.8% 91.0% * - 93.0% 90.5% 94.1% 91.6% - 2007-08 95.5% 89.4% - 89.4% * 89.6% 88.6% * - 90.8% 88.2% 92.3% 89.8% - Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 7-12) (AEA Indicator) 2008-09 2.0% 13.8% - 6.9% 0.0% 5.3% 11.1% * - 9.0% 5.3% 6.3% 4.8% - 2007-08 2.2% 8.5% - 8.5% 0.0% 9.2% 8.3% * - 11.6% 6.2% 9.1% 7.6% - 4-Year Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2009 Graduated 80.6% 37.1% - 49.0% * 49.3% 51.5% - - 44.6% 54.2% 33.3% 67.5% - Received GED 1.4% 6.6% - 3.8% * 4.3% 3.0% - - 5.4% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% - Continued HS 8.6% 22.5% - 30.8% * 30.4% 27.3% - - 30.4% 31.3% 33.3% 15.0% - Dropped Out 9.4% 33.8% - 16.3% * 15.9% 18.2% - - 19.6% 12.5% 33.3% 17.5% - Class of 2008 Graduated 79.1% 30.3% - 27.4% * 22.7% 38.5% * - 23.0% 32.1% 33.3% 16.7% * Received GED 1.5% 4.9% - 2.6% * 0.0% 7.7% * - 3.3% 1.8% 0.0% 3.0% * Continued HS 8.9% 29.2% - 38.5% * 46.7% 20.5% * - 36.1% 41.1% 33.3% 45.5% * Dropped Out 10.5% 35.6% - 31.6% * 30.7% 33.3% * - 37.7% 25.0% 33.3% 34.8% * 5-Year Extended Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2008 Graduated 83.4% 41.8% - 38.1% * 38.0% 38.5% * - 35.1% 41.1% 50.0% 33.3% - Received GED 2.1% 6.7% - 3.5% * 1.4% 7.7% * - 3.5% 3.6% 0.0% 5.0% - Continued HS 2.4% 11.9% - 23.0% * 28.2% 12.8% * - 14.0% 32.1% 16.7% 23.3% - Dropped Out 12.2% 39.6% - 35.4% * 32.4% 41.0% * - 47.4% 23.2% 33.3% 38.3% - Completion Rate II (Graduates, Continuers, and GED) (AEA Indicator) Class of 2009 90.6% 66.2% - 83.7% * 84.1% 81.8% - - 80.4% 87.5% 66.7% 82.5% - Class of 2008 89.5% 64.4% - 68.4% * 69.3% 66.7% * - 62.3% 75.0% 66.7% 65.2% * Completion Rate I (Graduates and Continuers) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Class of 2009 89.2% 59.6% - 79.8% * 79.7% 78.8% - - 75.0% 85.4% 66.7% 82.5% - Class of 2008 88.0% 59.6% - 65.8% * 69.3% 59.0% * - 59.0% 73.2% 66.7% 62.1% * COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 10.4% - 10.7% 16.7% 9.4% 12.2% * - 9.8% 11.5% 7.4% 14.7% - 2007-08 23.1% 9.3% - 9.3% 25.0% 9.8% 7.1% * - 7.4% 10.8% 0.0% 20.6% -


Page e232

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 6 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP RHSP/DAP Graduates Class of 2009 82.5% 70.1% - 79.2% - 78.8% 80.0% - - 76.3% 82.4% * 78.3% - Class of 2008 81.4% 57.1% - 57.1% * 57.9% 58.3% - - 53.8% 59.5% * 70.6% * AP/IB Results Tested 2009 21.2% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a 2008 20.9% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a Examinees >= Criterion 2009 51.2% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 50.1% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Scores >= Criterion 2009 47.4% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 46.0% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Texas Success Initiative (TSI) – Higher Education Readiness Component Eng Lang Arts 2010 60% 24% - 30% * 26% 47% * * 25% 33% < 1% 27% * 2009 63% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 66% 16% - 16% * 12% 29% * * 5% 22% < 1% 14% * 2009 62% * - * * * * * * * * * * * College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% 30% - 38% * 35% 50% * * 42% 29% * 33% * Class of 2008 59% 21% - 21% * 13% 33% * * 25% 17% * * * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% 15% - 12% * 10% 20% * * 16% < 1% * 6% * Class of 2008 58% 8% - 8% * 17% < 1% * * 17% < 1% * * * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% 6% - 13% * 10% * * * 17% < 1% * 6% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 6 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP RHSP/DAP Graduates Class of 2009 82.5% 70.1% - 79.2% - 78.8% 80.0% - - 76.3% 82.4% * 78.3% - Class of 2008 81.4% 57.1% - 57.1% * 57.9% 58.3% - - 53.8% 59.5% * 70.6% * AP/IB Results Tested 2009 21.2% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a 2008 20.9% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a Examinees >= Criterion 2009 51.2% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 50.1% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Scores >= Criterion 2009 47.4% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 46.0% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Texas Success Initiative (TSI) – Higher Education Readiness Component Eng Lang Arts 2010 60% 24% - 30% * 26% 47% * * 25% 33% < 1% 27% * 2009 63% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 66% 16% - 16% * 12% 29% * * 5% 22% < 1% 14% * 2009 62% * - * * * * * * * * * * * College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% 30% - 38% * 35% 50% * * 42% 29% * 33% * Class of 2008 59% 21% - 21% * 13% 33% * * 25% 17% * * * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% 15% - 12% * 10% 20% * * 16% < 1% * 6% * Class of 2008 58% 8% - 8% * 17% < 1% * * 17% < 1% * * * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% 6% - 13% * 10% * * * 17% < 1% * 6% * Class of 2008 44% 8% - 8% * 17% < 1% * * 17% < 1% * * *


Page e233

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Students: 190 100.0% - 477 4,824,778 Students By Grade: Early Childhood Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Pre-Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 4.4% Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 1 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.9% Grade 2 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.8% Grade 3 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.7% Grade 4 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 5 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.5% Grade 6 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 7 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 8 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.2% Grade 9 21 11.1% - 13.8% 8.1% Grade 10 31 16.3% - 18.9% 6.9% Grade 11 69 36.3% - 35.2% 6.4% Grade 12 69 36.3% - 32.1% 5.9% Ethnic Distribution: African American 2 1.1% - 7.3% 14.0% Hispanic 129 67.9% - 56.0% 48.6% White 59 31.1% - 36.3% 33.3% Native American 0 0.0% - 0.2% 0.4% Asian/Pac. Islander 0 0.0% - 0.2% 3.7% Economically Disadvantaged 152 80.0% - 73.8% 59.0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.9% Students w/Disciplinary Placements (2008-09) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 13.4% At-Risk 167 87.9% - 89.1% 47.2% Mobility (2008-09) 219 69.5% - 68.8% 18.9%

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Students: 190 100.0% - 477 4,824,778 Students By Grade: Early Childhood Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Pre-Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 4.4% Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 1 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.9% Grade 2 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.8% Grade 3 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.7% Grade 4 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 5 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.5% Grade 6 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 7 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 8 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.2% Grade 9 21 11.1% - 13.8% 8.1% Grade 10 31 16.3% - 18.9% 6.9% Grade 11 69 36.3% - 35.2% 6.4% Grade 12 69 36.3% - 32.1% 5.9% Ethnic Distribution: African American 2 1.1% - 7.3% 14.0% Hispanic 129 67.9% - 56.0% 48.6% White 59 31.1% - 36.3% 33.3% Native American 0 0.0% - 0.2% 0.4% Asian/Pac. Islander 0 0.0% - 0.2% 3.7% Economically Disadvantaged 152 80.0% - 73.8% 59.0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.9% Students w/Disciplinary Placements (2008-09) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 13.4% At-Risk 167 87.9% - 89.1% 47.2% Mobility (2008-09) 219 69.5% - 68.8% 18.9% Number of Students per Teacher 37.9 n/a - 21.8 14.5


Page e234

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Graduates (Class of 2009): Count Percent Group District State Total Graduates 72 100.0% - 154 264,275 By Ethnicity (incl. Special Ed.): African American 0 0.0% - 3 35,982 Hispanic 52 72.2% - 83 104,854 White 20 27.8% - 68 112,016 Native American 0 0.0% - 0 961 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0.0% - 0 10,462 By Graduation Type (incl. Special Ed.): Minimum H.S. Program 15 20.8% - 46 46,313 Recommended H.S. Pgm./DAP 57 79.2% - 108 217,962 Special Education Graduates 2 2.8% - 9 25,929 CLASS SIZE INFORMATION (Derived from teacher responsibility records.) Campus Class Size Averages by Grade and Subject: Campus Group District State Elementary: Kindergarten - - - 19.3 Grade 1 - - - 19.1 Grade 2 - - - 19.2 Grade 3 - - - 19.3 Grade 4 - - - 19.9 Grade 5 - - - 22.4 Grade 6 - - - 21.1 Mixed Grades - - - 24.7 Secondary: English/Language Arts 6.1 - 7.8 17.8 Foreign Languages 3.3 - 4.3 19.4 Mathematics 12.0 - 10.2 18.5 Science - - 8.9 19.3

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Graduates (Class of 2009): Count Percent Group District State Total Graduates 72 100.0% - 154 264,275 By Ethnicity (incl. Special Ed.): African American 0 0.0% - 3 35,982 Hispanic 52 72.2% - 83 104,854 White 20 27.8% - 68 112,016 Native American 0 0.0% - 0 961 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0.0% - 0 10,462 By Graduation Type (incl. Special Ed.): Minimum H.S. Program 15 20.8% - 46 46,313 Recommended H.S. Pgm./DAP 57 79.2% - 108 217,962 Special Education Graduates 2 2.8% - 9 25,929 CLASS SIZE INFORMATION (Derived from teacher responsibility records.) Campus Class Size Averages by Grade and Subject: Campus Group District State Elementary: Kindergarten - - - 19.3 Grade 1 - - - 19.1 Grade 2 - - - 19.2 Grade 3 - - - 19.3 Grade 4 - - - 19.9 Grade 5 - - - 22.4 Grade 6 - - - 21.1 Mixed Grades - - - 24.7 Secondary: English/Language Arts 6.1 - 7.8 17.8 Foreign Languages 3.3 - 4.3 19.4 Mathematics 12.0 - 10.2 18.5 Science - - 8.9 19.3 Social Studies 5.7 - 7.0 20.4


Page e235

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STAFF INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Staff: 12.8 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% Professional Staff: 6.8 53.0% - 63.0% 63.2% Teachers 5.0 39.0% - 50.0% 50.5% Professional Support 0.8 6.1% - 8.5% 8.9% Campus Admin. (School Leader.) 1.0 7.8% - 4.6% 2.8% Educational Aides: 6.0 47.0% - 15.4% 9.8% Total Minority Staff: 4.0 31.2% - 24.4% 43.9% Teachers By Ethnicity and Sex: African American 0.0 0.0% - 9.1% 9.5% Hispanic 3.2 63.6% - 19.1% 22.5% White 1.8 36.4% - 71.7% 66.4% Native American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 1.3% Males 1.8 36.4% - 12.9% 23.0% Females 3.2 63.6% - 87.1% 77.0% Teachers by Years of Experience: Beginning Teachers 2.8 55.8% - 12.8% 6.0% 1-5 Years Experience 1.0 20.0% - 22.9% 31.0% 6-10 Years Experience 1.2 24.3% - 37.0% 20.3% 11-20 Years Experience 0.0 0.0% - 9.1% 24.4% 0ver 20 Years Experience 0.0 0.0% - 18.3% 18.3% Campus Campus Group District State Average Years Experience of Teachers: 3.6 yrs. - yrs. 11.1 yrs. 11.3 yrs. Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 3.3 yrs. - yrs. 4.4 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers $29,913 - $29,913 $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $41,360 - $39,474 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $49,131 - $47,539 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience - - $45,181 $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience - - $43,473 $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $36,862 - $42,489 $48,263 Professional Support $57,248 - $47,479 $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $68,134 - $71,567 $70,209

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STAFF INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Staff: 12.8 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% Professional Staff: 6.8 53.0% - 63.0% 63.2% Teachers 5.0 39.0% - 50.0% 50.5% Professional Support 0.8 6.1% - 8.5% 8.9% Campus Admin. (School Leader.) 1.0 7.8% - 4.6% 2.8% Educational Aides: 6.0 47.0% - 15.4% 9.8% Total Minority Staff: 4.0 31.2% - 24.4% 43.9% Teachers By Ethnicity and Sex: African American 0.0 0.0% - 9.1% 9.5% Hispanic 3.2 63.6% - 19.1% 22.5% White 1.8 36.4% - 71.7% 66.4% Native American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 1.3% Males 1.8 36.4% - 12.9% 23.0% Females 3.2 63.6% - 87.1% 77.0% Teachers by Years of Experience: Beginning Teachers 2.8 55.8% - 12.8% 6.0% 1-5 Years Experience 1.0 20.0% - 22.9% 31.0% 6-10 Years Experience 1.2 24.3% - 37.0% 20.3% 11-20 Years Experience 0.0 0.0% - 9.1% 24.4% 0ver 20 Years Experience 0.0 0.0% - 18.3% 18.3% Campus Campus Group District State Average Years Experience of Teachers: 3.6 yrs. - yrs. 11.1 yrs. 11.3 yrs. Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 3.3 yrs. - yrs. 4.4 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers $29,913 - $29,913 $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $41,360 - $39,474 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $49,131 - $47,539 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience - - $45,181 $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience - - $43,473 $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $36,862 - $42,489 $48,263 Professional Support $57,248 - $47,479 $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $68,134 - $71,567 $70,209 Contracted Instructional Staff (not incl. above): 0.0 - 0.0 1,722.9


Page e236

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE INFORMATION |---------------------------Campus---------------------------| |---------Campus Group---------| (2008-09) General Percent Per All Percent Per All Percent Per Fund Student Funds Student Funds Student By Function: Total Operating Expenditures $2,008,725 100.0% $10,572 $2,445,875 100.0% $12,873 - - - Instruction (11,95) $924,986 46.0% $4,868 $1,311,337 53.6% $6,902 - - - Instructional-Related Services (12,13) $86,030 4.3% $453 $120,578 4.9% $635 - - - Instructional Leadership (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - School Leadership (23) $381,239 19.0% $2,007 $381,213 15.6% $2,006 - - - Support Services-Student (31,32,33) $204,739 10.2% $1,078 $216,359 8.8% $1,139 - - - Other Campus Costs (35,36,51,52,53) $411,731 20.5% $2,167 $416,388 17.0% $2,192 - - - By Program: Total Operating Expenditures $1,596,994 100.0% $8,405 $2,029,487 100.0% $10,682 - - - Bilingual/ESL Education (25) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Career & Technical Education (22) $85,589 5.4% $450 $85,589 4.2% $450 - - - Accelerated Education (24,30) $266,447 16.7% $1,402 $458,068 22.6% $2,411 - - - Gifted & Talented Education (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Regular Education (11) $1,109,458 69.5% $5,839 $1,248,762 61.5% $6,572 - - - Special Education (23) $135,500 8.5% $713 $237,068 11.7% $1,248 - - - Other (26,28,29) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Student Enrollment by Program: Bilingual/ESL Education 6 3.2% - 1.3% 16.1% Career & Technical Education 64 33.7% - 36.3% 21.3% Gifted & Talented Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Special Education 25 13.2% - 12.6% 9.0% Teachers by Program (population served): Bilingual/ESL Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.0% Career & Technical Education 0.0 0.0% - 8.9% 3.9% Compensatory Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.4% Gifted & Talented Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 2.0% Regular Education 5.0 100.0% - 86.6% 71.0% Special Education 0.0 0.0% - 4.6% 9.6% Other 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.0% '^' Primary Spring Administration, plus October first-time 11th grade testers who pass all 4 tests in October. '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 190 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE INFORMATION |---------------------------Campus---------------------------| |---------Campus Group---------| (2008-09) General Percent Per All Percent Per All Percent Per Fund Student Funds Student Funds Student By Function: Total Operating Expenditures $2,008,725 100.0% $10,572 $2,445,875 100.0% $12,873 - - - Instruction (11,95) $924,986 46.0% $4,868 $1,311,337 53.6% $6,902 - - - Instructional-Related Services (12,13) $86,030 4.3% $453 $120,578 4.9% $635 - - - Instructional Leadership (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - School Leadership (23) $381,239 19.0% $2,007 $381,213 15.6% $2,006 - - - Support Services-Student (31,32,33) $204,739 10.2% $1,078 $216,359 8.8% $1,139 - - - Other Campus Costs (35,36,51,52,53) $411,731 20.5% $2,167 $416,388 17.0% $2,192 - - - By Program: Total Operating Expenditures $1,596,994 100.0% $8,405 $2,029,487 100.0% $10,682 - - - Bilingual/ESL Education (25) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Career & Technical Education (22) $85,589 5.4% $450 $85,589 4.2% $450 - - - Accelerated Education (24,30) $266,447 16.7% $1,402 $458,068 22.6% $2,411 - - - Gifted & Talented Education (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Regular Education (11) $1,109,458 69.5% $5,839 $1,248,762 61.5% $6,572 - - - Special Education (23) $135,500 8.5% $713 $237,068 11.7% $1,248 - - - Other (26,28,29) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Student Enrollment by Program: Bilingual/ESL Education 6 3.2% - 1.3% 16.1% Career & Technical Education 64 33.7% - 36.3% 21.3% Gifted & Talented Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Special Education 25 13.2% - 12.6% 9.0% Teachers by Program (population served): Bilingual/ESL Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.0% Career & Technical Education 0.0 0.0% - 8.9% 3.9% Compensatory Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.4% Gifted & Talented Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 2.0% Regular Education 5.0 100.0% - 86.6% 71.0% Special Education 0.0 0.0% - 4.6% 9.6% Other 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.0% '^' Primary Spring Administration, plus October first-time 11th grade testers who pass all 4 tests in October. '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.


Page e237

U282M110023 0023

2009-10 Academic Excellence Indicator System District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (FORT WORT Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - FORT WOR Campus #: 220812001 2010 Accountability Rating: AEA: Academically Unacceptable This is a Charter School. Note: District at-risk completion data were used for 2010 accountability evaluation purposes.


Page e238

U282M110023 0023



Page e239

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 9 Reading 2010 92% 93% - 93% 90% * * * * * 92% * 93% * 2009 88% 73% - 73% 57% > 99% * * * 80% 70% * 60% * Mathematics 2010 72% 15% - 15% 11% * * * * * 9% * 17% * 2009 69% 14% - 14% * * * * * * * * < 1% * All Tests 2010 71% 31% - 31% 27% * * * * * 17% * 33% * 2009 67% 50% - 50% 38% 80% 40% * * 43% 55% * 31% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 10 Eng Lang Arts 2010 91% 69% - 69% 64% 60% 89% * * 67% 71% * 72% * 2009 88% 67% - 67% 64% 71% 67% * * 67% 67% * 55% * Mathematics 2010 75% 15% - 15% 13% 20% < 1% * * 22% 9% * 15% * 2009 67% 11% - 11% 14% 20% < 1% * * 7% 15% * 16% * Science 2010 75% 15% - 15% 13% < 1% 17% * * 22% 9% * 15% * 2009 67% 5% - 5% < 1% * 17% * * 7% < 1% * < 1% * Soc Studies 2010 93% 65% - 65% 43% 60% * * * 50% 78% * 60% * 2009 91% 58% - 58% 55% 60% 63% * * 62% 55% * 59% * All Tests 2010 66% 23% - 23% 36% < 1% 22% * * 25% 21% * 22% * 2009 56% 22% - 22% 13% 33% 25% * * 18% 25% * 25% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard ^ Grade 11 Eng Lang Arts 2010 93% 86% - 86% 78% * 88% * * 71% 93% * 81% * 2009 93% 82% - 82% 71% 80% 90% * * 77% 87% * 79% * Mathematics 2010 89% 42% - 42% 30% * 33% * * 14% 58% * 36% * 2009 82% 48% - 48% < 1% 64% 58% * * 47% 50% * 41% * Science 2010 92% 56% - 56% 30% * 83% * * 43% 64% * 50% * 2009 86% 59% - 59% 17% 64% 73% * * 67% 50% * 45% * Soc Studies 2010 98% 74% - 74% 60% * 83% * * 43% 92% * 64% * 2009 97% 84% - 84% 75% 91% 83% * * 87% 82% * 83% * All Tests 2010 83% 45% - 45% 20% * 50% * * 25% 57% * 41% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 9 Reading 2010 92% 93% - 93% 90% * * * * * 92% * 93% * 2009 88% 73% - 73% 57% > 99% * * * 80% 70% * 60% * Mathematics 2010 72% 15% - 15% 11% * * * * * 9% * 17% * 2009 69% 14% - 14% * * * * * * * * < 1% * All Tests 2010 71% 31% - 31% 27% * * * * * 17% * 33% * 2009 67% 50% - 50% 38% 80% 40% * * 43% 55% * 31% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 10 Eng Lang Arts 2010 91% 69% - 69% 64% 60% 89% * * 67% 71% * 72% * 2009 88% 67% - 67% 64% 71% 67% * * 67% 67% * 55% * Mathematics 2010 75% 15% - 15% 13% 20% < 1% * * 22% 9% * 15% * 2009 67% 11% - 11% 14% 20% < 1% * * 7% 15% * 16% * Science 2010 75% 15% - 15% 13% < 1% 17% * * 22% 9% * 15% * 2009 67% 5% - 5% < 1% * 17% * * 7% < 1% * < 1% * Soc Studies 2010 93% 65% - 65% 43% 60% * * * 50% 78% * 60% * 2009 91% 58% - 58% 55% 60% 63% * * 62% 55% * 59% * All Tests 2010 66% 23% - 23% 36% < 1% 22% * * 25% 21% * 22% * 2009 56% 22% - 22% 13% 33% 25% * * 18% 25% * 25% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard ^ Grade 11 Eng Lang Arts 2010 93% 86% - 86% 78% * 88% * * 71% 93% * 81% * 2009 93% 82% - 82% 71% 80% 90% * * 77% 87% * 79% * Mathematics 2010 89% 42% - 42% 30% * 33% * * 14% 58% * 36% * 2009 82% 48% - 48% < 1% 64% 58% * * 47% 50% * 41% * Science 2010 92% 56% - 56% 30% * 83% * * 43% 64% * 50% * 2009 86% 59% - 59% 17% 64% 73% * * 67% 50% * 45% * Soc Studies 2010 98% 74% - 74% 60% * 83% * * 43% 92% * 64% * 2009 97% 84% - 84% 75% 91% 83% * * 87% 82% * 83% * All Tests 2010 83% 45% - 45% 20% * 50% * * 25% 57% * 41% * 2009 76% 45% - 45% 11% 55% 58% * * 50% 41% * 38% *


Page e240

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 81% - 81% 77% 82% 90% * * 73% 85% 17% 81% * 2009 88% 74% - 74% 64% 82% 77% * * 73% 75% * 65% * Mathematics 2010 84% 25% - 25% 19% 40% 21% * * 22% 26% < 1% 23% * 2009 80% 29% - 29% 9% 50% 30% * * 27% 31% * 26% * Science 2010 83% 34% - 34% 22% 29% 50% * * 31% 36% * 33% * 2009 78% 38% - 38% 6% 50% 53% * * 38% 37% * 29% * Soc Studies 2010 95% 69% - 69% 53% 75% 90% * * 47% 86% * 63% * 2009 93% 73% - 73% 63% 81% 75% * * 75% 71% * 73% * All Tests 2010 77% 33% - 33% 28% 36% 40% * * 33% 33% < 1% 32% * 2009 72% 36% - 36% 18% 52% 41% * * 35% 38% 20% 31% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard with TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 96% 90% - 90% 90% 91% 90% * * 86% 93% 17% 88% * 2009 95% 84% - 84% 75% 86% 91% * * 85% 83% * 78% * Mathematics 2010 91% 33% - 33% 26% 50% 29% * * 22% 38% < 1% 33% * 2009 88% 37% - 37% 13% 56% 43% * * 39% 34% * 32% * Science 2010 92% 53% - 53% 33% 57% 75% * * 38% 64% * 52% * 2009 83% 46% - 46% 13% 57% 65% * * 48% 42% * 38% * Soc Studies 2010 99% 86% - 86% 76% > 99% 90% * * 73% 95% * 79% * 2009 98% 88% - 88% 84% 94% 85% * * 93% 82% * 85% * All Tests 2010 88% 42% - 42% 34% 55% 45% * * 42% 43% < 1% 44% * 2009 82% 44% - 44% 24% 60% 52% * * 48% 42% 20% 38% * TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% 11% - 11% 7% < 1% 25% * * < 1% 18% < 1% 13% * 2009 31% 3% - 3% < 1% 5% 5% * * 6% < 1% * < 1% * Mathematics 2010 29% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * 2009 28% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% * Science 2010 28% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% * 2009 26% 2% - 2% < 1% 7% < 1% * * 3% < 1% * 3% * Soc Studies 2010 47% 11% - 11% 6% 13% 20% * * < 1% 19% * < 1% * 2009 44% 7% - 7% < 1% 6% 15% * * 14% < 1% * 5% * All Tests 2010 15% 3% - 3% < 1% < 1% 10% * * < 1% 5% < 1% 4% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 81% - 81% 77% 82% 90% * * 73% 85% 17% 81% * 2009 88% 74% - 74% 64% 82% 77% * * 73% 75% * 65% * Mathematics 2010 84% 25% - 25% 19% 40% 21% * * 22% 26% < 1% 23% * 2009 80% 29% - 29% 9% 50% 30% * * 27% 31% * 26% * Science 2010 83% 34% - 34% 22% 29% 50% * * 31% 36% * 33% * 2009 78% 38% - 38% 6% 50% 53% * * 38% 37% * 29% * Soc Studies 2010 95% 69% - 69% 53% 75% 90% * * 47% 86% * 63% * 2009 93% 73% - 73% 63% 81% 75% * * 75% 71% * 73% * All Tests 2010 77% 33% - 33% 28% 36% 40% * * 33% 33% < 1% 32% * 2009 72% 36% - 36% 18% 52% 41% * * 35% 38% 20% 31% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard with TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 96% 90% - 90% 90% 91% 90% * * 86% 93% 17% 88% * 2009 95% 84% - 84% 75% 86% 91% * * 85% 83% * 78% * Mathematics 2010 91% 33% - 33% 26% 50% 29% * * 22% 38% < 1% 33% * 2009 88% 37% - 37% 13% 56% 43% * * 39% 34% * 32% * Science 2010 92% 53% - 53% 33% 57% 75% * * 38% 64% * 52% * 2009 83% 46% - 46% 13% 57% 65% * * 48% 42% * 38% * Soc Studies 2010 99% 86% - 86% 76% > 99% 90% * * 73% 95% * 79% * 2009 98% 88% - 88% 84% 94% 85% * * 93% 82% * 85% * All Tests 2010 88% 42% - 42% 34% 55% 45% * * 42% 43% < 1% 44% * 2009 82% 44% - 44% 24% 60% 52% * * 48% 42% 20% 38% * TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% 11% - 11% 7% < 1% 25% * * < 1% 18% < 1% 13% * 2009 31% 3% - 3% < 1% 5% 5% * * 6% < 1% * < 1% * Mathematics 2010 29% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * 2009 28% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% * Science 2010 28% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% * 2009 26% 2% - 2% < 1% 7% < 1% * * 3% < 1% * 3% * Soc Studies 2010 47% 11% - 11% 6% 13% 20% * * < 1% 19% * < 1% * 2009 44% 7% - 7% < 1% 6% 15% * * 14% < 1% * 5% * All Tests 2010 15% 3% - 3% < 1% < 1% 10% * * < 1% 5% < 1% 4% * 2009 15% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% *


Page e241

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Progress (Sum of All Grades Tested) (AEA Indicator) 2010 85% 79% - 79% 71% 83% 85% * * 76% 81% 42% 78% * 2009 81% 76% - 76% 62% 85% 80% * * 75% 76% 67% 74% * TAKS-M Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 85% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 75% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 69% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 58% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 51% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 67% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 64% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 64% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 57% * - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 81% - 81% 78% 82% 90% * * 75% 85% 38% 82% * 2009 88% 74% - 74% 64% 82% 77% * * 73% 75% * 65% * Mathematics 2010 84% 28% - 28% 24% 40% 21% * * 30% 26% 25% 27% * 2009 80% 29% - 29% 9% 50% 30% * * 27% 31% * 26% * Science 2010 82% 36% - 36% 26% 29% 50% * * 35% 36% * 36% * 2009 77% 38% - 38% 6% 50% 53% * * 38% 37% * 29% * Soc Studies 2010 94% 70% - 70% 56% 75% 90% * * 50% 86% * 64% * 2009 92% 73% - 73% 63% 81% 75% * * 75% 71% * 73% * All Tests 2010 76% 35% - 35% 32% 36% 40% * * 38% 33% 22% 35% * 2009 71% 36% - 36% 18% 52% 41% * * 35% 38% 20% 31% * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% 13% - 13% 9% < 1% 25% * * 4% 18% 13% 14% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Progress (Sum of All Grades Tested) (AEA Indicator) 2010 85% 79% - 79% 71% 83% 85% * * 76% 81% 42% 78% * 2009 81% 76% - 76% 62% 85% 80% * * 75% 76% 67% 74% * TAKS-M Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 85% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 75% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 69% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 58% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 51% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 67% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 64% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 64% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 57% * - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 81% - 81% 78% 82% 90% * * 75% 85% 38% 82% * 2009 88% 74% - 74% 64% 82% 77% * * 73% 75% * 65% * Mathematics 2010 84% 28% - 28% 24% 40% 21% * * 30% 26% 25% 27% * 2009 80% 29% - 29% 9% 50% 30% * * 27% 31% * 26% * Science 2010 82% 36% - 36% 26% 29% 50% * * 35% 36% * 36% * 2009 77% 38% - 38% 6% 50% 53% * * 38% 37% * 29% * Soc Studies 2010 94% 70% - 70% 56% 75% 90% * * 50% 86% * 64% * 2009 92% 73% - 73% 63% 81% 75% * * 75% 71% * 73% * All Tests 2010 76% 35% - 35% 32% 36% 40% * * 38% 33% 22% 35% * 2009 71% 36% - 36% 18% 52% 41% * * 35% 38% 20% 31% * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% 13% - 13% 9% < 1% 25% * * 4% 18% 13% 14% * Mathematics 2010 28% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% *


Page e242

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP 2010 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.6% 99.1% - 99.1% 100.0% 100.0% 97.1% - * 100.0% 98.4% 100.0% 98.9% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 89.4% - 89.4% 85.1% 93.3% 91.2% - * 89.6% 89.1% 0.0% 87.2% - Not on TAKS 7.8% 9.7% - 9.7% 14.9% 6.7% 5.9% - * 10.4% 9.4% 100.0% 11.7% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 7.1% - 7.1% 8.5% 6.7% 5.9% - * 6.3% 7.8% 72.7% 8.5% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 1.8% - 1.8% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% - * 4.2% 0.0% 18.2% 2.1% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 0.9% - 0.9% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% - * 0.0% 1.6% 9.1% 1.1% - By Acct Status Acct System 90.0% 56.6% - 56.6% 68.1% 36.7% 58.8% - * 50.0% 62.5% 63.6% 53.2% - Non-Acct System 8.6% 42.5% - 42.5% 31.9% 63.3% 38.2% - * 50.0% 35.9% 36.4% 45.7% - Mobile 4.4% 40.7% - 40.7% 27.7% 63.3% 38.2% - * 45.8% 35.9% 18.2% 43.6% - Non-Acct Test 4.2% 1.8% - 1.8% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% - * 4.2% 0.0% 18.2% 2.1% - Not Tested 1.4% 0.9% - 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% - * 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 1.1% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 0.9% - 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% - * 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 1.1% - Total Count 3,175,337 113 - 113 47 30 34 0 2 48 64 11 94 0 2009 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.5% 99.3% - 99.3% 100.0% 100.0% 98.0% * - 98.6% 100.0% 100.0% 99.0% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 93.2% - 93.2% 92.0% 95.7% 92.0% * - 90.5% 95.9% 25.0% 93.2% - Not on TAKS 7.7% 6.1% - 6.1% 8.0% 4.3% 6.0% * - 8.1% 4.1% 75.0% 5.8% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 4.8% - 4.8% 6.0% 4.3% 4.0% * - 8.1% 1.4% 58.3% 4.9% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 1.4% - 1.4% 2.0% 0.0% 2.0% * - 0.0% 2.7% 16.7% 1.0% - By Acct Status Acct System 87.3% 53.7% - 53.7% 60.0% 50.0% 50.0% * - 50.0% 57.5% 25.0% 56.3% - Non-Acct System 11.2% 45.6% - 45.6% 40.0% 50.0% 48.0% * - 48.6% 42.5% 75.0% 42.7% - Mobile 4.7% 42.2% - 42.2% 34.0% 47.8% 46.0% * - 43.2% 41.1% 33.3% 38.8% - Non-Acct Test 6.4% 3.4% - 3.4% 6.0% 2.2% 2.0% * - 5.4% 1.4% 41.7% 3.9% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Not Tested 1.5% 0.7% - 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% * - 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 0.7% - 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% * - 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP 2010 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.6% 99.1% - 99.1% 100.0% 100.0% 97.1% - * 100.0% 98.4% 100.0% 98.9% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 89.4% - 89.4% 85.1% 93.3% 91.2% - * 89.6% 89.1% 0.0% 87.2% - Not on TAKS 7.8% 9.7% - 9.7% 14.9% 6.7% 5.9% - * 10.4% 9.4% 100.0% 11.7% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 7.1% - 7.1% 8.5% 6.7% 5.9% - * 6.3% 7.8% 72.7% 8.5% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 1.8% - 1.8% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% - * 4.2% 0.0% 18.2% 2.1% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 0.9% - 0.9% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% - * 0.0% 1.6% 9.1% 1.1% - By Acct Status Acct System 90.0% 56.6% - 56.6% 68.1% 36.7% 58.8% - * 50.0% 62.5% 63.6% 53.2% - Non-Acct System 8.6% 42.5% - 42.5% 31.9% 63.3% 38.2% - * 50.0% 35.9% 36.4% 45.7% - Mobile 4.4% 40.7% - 40.7% 27.7% 63.3% 38.2% - * 45.8% 35.9% 18.2% 43.6% - Non-Acct Test 4.2% 1.8% - 1.8% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% - * 4.2% 0.0% 18.2% 2.1% - Not Tested 1.4% 0.9% - 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% - * 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 1.1% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 0.9% - 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% - * 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 1.1% - Total Count 3,175,337 113 - 113 47 30 34 0 2 48 64 11 94 0 2009 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.5% 99.3% - 99.3% 100.0% 100.0% 98.0% * - 98.6% 100.0% 100.0% 99.0% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 93.2% - 93.2% 92.0% 95.7% 92.0% * - 90.5% 95.9% 25.0% 93.2% - Not on TAKS 7.7% 6.1% - 6.1% 8.0% 4.3% 6.0% * - 8.1% 4.1% 75.0% 5.8% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 4.8% - 4.8% 6.0% 4.3% 4.0% * - 8.1% 1.4% 58.3% 4.9% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 1.4% - 1.4% 2.0% 0.0% 2.0% * - 0.0% 2.7% 16.7% 1.0% - By Acct Status Acct System 87.3% 53.7% - 53.7% 60.0% 50.0% 50.0% * - 50.0% 57.5% 25.0% 56.3% - Non-Acct System 11.2% 45.6% - 45.6% 40.0% 50.0% 48.0% * - 48.6% 42.5% 75.0% 42.7% - Mobile 4.7% 42.2% - 42.2% 34.0% 47.8% 46.0% * - 43.2% 41.1% 33.3% 38.8% - Non-Acct Test 6.4% 3.4% - 3.4% 6.0% 2.2% 2.0% * - 5.4% 1.4% 41.7% 3.9% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Not Tested 1.5% 0.7% - 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% * - 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 0.7% - 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% * - 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Count 3,132,150 147 - 147 50 46 50 1 0 74 73 12 103 0


Page e243

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 5 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers Percent of Failers Passing TAKS (Sum of Grades 4-11) Reading/ELA 2010 57% 71% - 71% * * * * * * * * 67% * 2009 43% 29% - 29% * * * * * 40% * * 29% * Mathematics 2010 43% 24% - 24% 22% * * * * 25% 22% * 31% * 2009 36% 32% - 32% < 1% 50% 38% * * 20% 44% * 29% * Attendance Rate 2008-09 95.6% 80.7% - 80.7% 79.2% 83.7% 80.3% * * 81.7% 79.6% 83.6% 80.3% - 2007-08 95.5% 82.1% - 82.1% 80.9% 84.0% 81.8% * * 82.7% 81.5% 91.3% 81.8% - Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 7-12) (AEA Indicator) 2008-09 2.0% 20.2% - 20.2% 24.2% 14.6% 19.8% * * 17.6% 23.0% 14.8% 20.9% - 2007-08 2.2% 22.3% - 22.3% 22.3% 23.3% 21.9% * * 22.5% 22.0% 22.2% 20.5% - 4-Year Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2009 Graduated 80.6% 19.4% - 19.4% 12.1% 25.9% 22.2% * * 22.8% 15.7% 40.0% 19.1% - Received GED 1.4% 2.8% - 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 6.7% * * 1.8% 3.9% 0.0% 0.0% - Continued HS 8.6% 25.9% - 25.9% 36.4% 44.4% 8.9% * * 38.6% 11.8% 30.0% 38.3% - Dropped Out 9.4% 51.9% - 51.9% 51.5% 29.6% 62.2% * * 36.8% 68.6% 30.0% 42.6% - Class of 2008 Graduated 79.1% 28.3% - 28.3% 22.2% 22.2% 32.8% - * 20.0% 36.2% * 24.4% - Received GED 1.5% 7.1% - 7.1% 3.7% 5.6% 9.4% - * 12.7% 1.7% * 11.1% - Continued HS 8.9% 23.0% - 23.0% 22.2% 27.8% 21.9% - * 21.8% 24.1% * 33.3% - Dropped Out 10.5% 41.6% - 41.6% 51.9% 44.4% 35.9% - * 45.5% 37.9% * 31.1% - 5-Year Extended Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2008 Graduated 83.4% 35.4% - 35.4% 26.9% 31.6% 39.1% - * 29.6% 40.7% * 34.8% - Received GED 2.1% 10.6% - 10.6% 7.7% 5.3% 14.1% - * 18.5% 3.4% * 10.9% - Continued HS 2.4% 9.7% - 9.7% 7.7% 10.5% 10.9% - * 7.4% 11.9% * 17.4% - Dropped Out 12.2% 44.2% - 44.2% 57.7% 52.6% 35.9% - * 44.4% 44.1% * 37.0% - Completion Rate II (Graduates, Continuers, and GED) (AEA Indicator) Class of 2009 90.6% 48.1% - 48.1% 48.5% 70.4% 37.8% * * 63.2% 31.4% 70.0% 57.4% - Class of 2008 89.5% 58.4% - 58.4% 48.1% 55.6% 64.1% - * 54.5% 62.1% * 68.9% - Completion Rate I (Graduates and Continuers) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Class of 2009 89.2% 45.4% - 45.4% 48.5% 70.4% 31.1% * * 61.4% 27.5% 70.0% 57.4% - Class of 2008 88.0% 51.3% - 51.3% 44.4% 50.0% 54.7% - * 41.8% 60.3% * 57.8% - COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 11.0% - 11.0% 8.5% 11.3% 12.5% * * 10.1% 12.0% 28.6% 12.0% -

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 5 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers Percent of Failers Passing TAKS (Sum of Grades 4-11) Reading/ELA 2010 57% 71% - 71% * * * * * * * * 67% * 2009 43% 29% - 29% * * * * * 40% * * 29% * Mathematics 2010 43% 24% - 24% 22% * * * * 25% 22% * 31% * 2009 36% 32% - 32% < 1% 50% 38% * * 20% 44% * 29% * Attendance Rate 2008-09 95.6% 80.7% - 80.7% 79.2% 83.7% 80.3% * * 81.7% 79.6% 83.6% 80.3% - 2007-08 95.5% 82.1% - 82.1% 80.9% 84.0% 81.8% * * 82.7% 81.5% 91.3% 81.8% - Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 7-12) (AEA Indicator) 2008-09 2.0% 20.2% - 20.2% 24.2% 14.6% 19.8% * * 17.6% 23.0% 14.8% 20.9% - 2007-08 2.2% 22.3% - 22.3% 22.3% 23.3% 21.9% * * 22.5% 22.0% 22.2% 20.5% - 4-Year Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2009 Graduated 80.6% 19.4% - 19.4% 12.1% 25.9% 22.2% * * 22.8% 15.7% 40.0% 19.1% - Received GED 1.4% 2.8% - 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 6.7% * * 1.8% 3.9% 0.0% 0.0% - Continued HS 8.6% 25.9% - 25.9% 36.4% 44.4% 8.9% * * 38.6% 11.8% 30.0% 38.3% - Dropped Out 9.4% 51.9% - 51.9% 51.5% 29.6% 62.2% * * 36.8% 68.6% 30.0% 42.6% - Class of 2008 Graduated 79.1% 28.3% - 28.3% 22.2% 22.2% 32.8% - * 20.0% 36.2% * 24.4% - Received GED 1.5% 7.1% - 7.1% 3.7% 5.6% 9.4% - * 12.7% 1.7% * 11.1% - Continued HS 8.9% 23.0% - 23.0% 22.2% 27.8% 21.9% - * 21.8% 24.1% * 33.3% - Dropped Out 10.5% 41.6% - 41.6% 51.9% 44.4% 35.9% - * 45.5% 37.9% * 31.1% - 5-Year Extended Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2008 Graduated 83.4% 35.4% - 35.4% 26.9% 31.6% 39.1% - * 29.6% 40.7% * 34.8% - Received GED 2.1% 10.6% - 10.6% 7.7% 5.3% 14.1% - * 18.5% 3.4% * 10.9% - Continued HS 2.4% 9.7% - 9.7% 7.7% 10.5% 10.9% - * 7.4% 11.9% * 17.4% - Dropped Out 12.2% 44.2% - 44.2% 57.7% 52.6% 35.9% - * 44.4% 44.1% * 37.0% - Completion Rate II (Graduates, Continuers, and GED) (AEA Indicator) Class of 2009 90.6% 48.1% - 48.1% 48.5% 70.4% 37.8% * * 63.2% 31.4% 70.0% 57.4% - Class of 2008 89.5% 58.4% - 58.4% 48.1% 55.6% 64.1% - * 54.5% 62.1% * 68.9% - Completion Rate I (Graduates and Continuers) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Class of 2009 89.2% 45.4% - 45.4% 48.5% 70.4% 31.1% * * 61.4% 27.5% 70.0% 57.4% - Class of 2008 88.0% 51.3% - 51.3% 44.4% 50.0% 54.7% - * 41.8% 60.3% * 57.8% - COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 11.0% - 11.0% 8.5% 11.3% 12.5% * * 10.1% 12.0% 28.6% 12.0% - 2007-08 23.1% 7.1% - 7.1% 9.1% 7.4% 5.7% * * 5.4% 8.9% 0.0% 7.4% -


Page e244

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 6 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP RHSP/DAP Graduates Class of 2009 82.5% 82.5% - 82.5% 66.7% 100.0% 77.8% - * 81.0% 84.2% 66.7% 76.0% - Class of 2008 81.4% 81.1% - 81.1% 75.0% 70.0% 88.9% - * 83.3% 80.0% * 73.7% - AP/IB Results Tested 2009 21.2% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a 2008 20.9% 1.3% - 1.3% 0.0% 4.5% 0.0% - * 0.0% 2.4% n/a n/a n/a Examinees >= Criterion 2009 51.2% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 50.1% * - * - * - - - - * n/a n/a n/a Scores >= Criterion 2009 47.4% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 46.0% * - * - * - - - - * n/a n/a n/a Texas Success Initiative (TSI) – Higher Education Readiness Component Eng Lang Arts 2010 60% 35% - 35% < 1% * 63% * * 14% 46% * 27% * 2009 63% 30% - 30% 29% 14% 38% * * 11% 43% * 29% * Mathematics 2010 66% 17% - 17% 10% * 17% * * < 1% 27% * 15% * 2009 62% 4% - 4% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% 7% * 5% * SAT/ACT Results Tested Class of 2009 61.5% 11.8% - 11.8% 0.0% 8.3% 21.4% - * 15.8% 6.7% n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 65.0% 2.9% - 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 5.6% - * 9.1% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a At/Above Criterion Class of 2009 26.9% * - * - * * - - * * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 27.2% * - * - - * - - * - n/a n/a n/a Average SAT Score Class of 2009 985 * - * - * * - - * * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 987 * - * - - * - - * - n/a n/a n/a Average ACT Score Class of 2009 20.5 - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 20.5 - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% 47% - 47% * 40% 54% * * 50% 43% * 30% * Class of 2008 59% 25% - 25% 20% * 36% * * < 1% 36% * 10% * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% 20% - 20% * 17% 25% * * 17% 25% < 1% 27% * Class of 2008 58% 26% - 26% 20% * 30% * * 33% 23% * 33% * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% 11% - 11% * 20% 8% * * 9% 14% * 10% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 6 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP RHSP/DAP Graduates Class of 2009 82.5% 82.5% - 82.5% 66.7% 100.0% 77.8% - * 81.0% 84.2% 66.7% 76.0% - Class of 2008 81.4% 81.1% - 81.1% 75.0% 70.0% 88.9% - * 83.3% 80.0% * 73.7% - AP/IB Results Tested 2009 21.2% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a 2008 20.9% 1.3% - 1.3% 0.0% 4.5% 0.0% - * 0.0% 2.4% n/a n/a n/a Examinees >= Criterion 2009 51.2% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 50.1% * - * - * - - - - * n/a n/a n/a Scores >= Criterion 2009 47.4% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 46.0% * - * - * - - - - * n/a n/a n/a Texas Success Initiative (TSI) – Higher Education Readiness Component Eng Lang Arts 2010 60% 35% - 35% < 1% * 63% * * 14% 46% * 27% * 2009 63% 30% - 30% 29% 14% 38% * * 11% 43% * 29% * Mathematics 2010 66% 17% - 17% 10% * 17% * * < 1% 27% * 15% * 2009 62% 4% - 4% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% 7% * 5% * SAT/ACT Results Tested Class of 2009 61.5% 11.8% - 11.8% 0.0% 8.3% 21.4% - * 15.8% 6.7% n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 65.0% 2.9% - 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 5.6% - * 9.1% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a At/Above Criterion Class of 2009 26.9% * - * - * * - - * * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 27.2% * - * - - * - - * - n/a n/a n/a Average SAT Score Class of 2009 985 * - * - * * - - * * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 987 * - * - - * - - * - n/a n/a n/a Average ACT Score Class of 2009 20.5 - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 20.5 - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% 47% - 47% * 40% 54% * * 50% 43% * 30% * Class of 2008 59% 25% - 25% 20% * 36% * * < 1% 36% * 10% * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% 20% - 20% * 17% 25% * * 17% 25% < 1% 27% * Class of 2008 58% 26% - 26% 20% * 30% * * 33% 23% * 33% * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% 11% - 11% * 20% 8% * * 9% 14% * 10% * Class of 2008 44% 5% - 5% < 1% * 10% * * < 1% 8% * < 1% *


Page e245

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Students: 201 100.0% - 201 4,824,778 Students By Grade: Early Childhood Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Pre-Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 4.4% Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 1 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.9% Grade 2 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.8% Grade 3 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.7% Grade 4 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 5 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.5% Grade 6 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 7 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 8 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.2% Grade 9 49 24.4% - 24.4% 8.1% Grade 10 46 22.9% - 22.9% 6.9% Grade 11 45 22.4% - 22.4% 6.4% Grade 12 61 30.3% - 30.3% 5.9% Ethnic Distribution: African American 76 37.8% - 37.8% 14.0% Hispanic 54 26.9% - 26.9% 48.6% White 69 34.3% - 34.3% 33.3% Native American 1 0.5% - 0.5% 0.4% Asian/Pac. Islander 1 0.5% - 0.5% 3.7% Economically Disadvantaged 155 77.1% - 77.1% 59.0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.9% Students w/Disciplinary Placements (2008-09) 3 0.8% - 0.8% 13.4% At-Risk 182 90.5% - 90.5% 47.2% Mobility (2008-09) 264 73.1% - 73.1% 18.9%

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Students: 201 100.0% - 201 4,824,778 Students By Grade: Early Childhood Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Pre-Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 4.4% Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 1 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.9% Grade 2 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.8% Grade 3 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.7% Grade 4 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 5 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.5% Grade 6 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 7 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 8 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.2% Grade 9 49 24.4% - 24.4% 8.1% Grade 10 46 22.9% - 22.9% 6.9% Grade 11 45 22.4% - 22.4% 6.4% Grade 12 61 30.3% - 30.3% 5.9% Ethnic Distribution: African American 76 37.8% - 37.8% 14.0% Hispanic 54 26.9% - 26.9% 48.6% White 69 34.3% - 34.3% 33.3% Native American 1 0.5% - 0.5% 0.4% Asian/Pac. Islander 1 0.5% - 0.5% 3.7% Economically Disadvantaged 155 77.1% - 77.1% 59.0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.9% Students w/Disciplinary Placements (2008-09) 3 0.8% - 0.8% 13.4% At-Risk 182 90.5% - 90.5% 47.2% Mobility (2008-09) 264 73.1% - 73.1% 18.9% Number of Students per Teacher 18.1 n/a - 18.1 14.5


Page e246

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Graduates (Class of 2009): Count Percent Group District State Total Graduates 40 100.0% - 40 264,275 By Ethnicity (incl. Special Ed.): African American 9 22.5% - 9 35,982 Hispanic 12 30.0% - 12 104,854 White 18 45.0% - 18 112,016 Native American 0 0.0% - 0 961 Asian/Pacific Islander 1 2.5% - 1 10,462 By Graduation Type (incl. Special Ed.): Minimum H.S. Program 7 17.5% - 7 46,313 Recommended H.S. Pgm./DAP 33 82.5% - 33 217,962 Special Education Graduates 6 15.0% - 6 25,929 CLASS SIZE INFORMATION (Derived from teacher responsibility records.) Campus Class Size Averages by Grade and Subject: Campus Group District State Elementary: Kindergarten - - - 19.3 Grade 1 - - - 19.1 Grade 2 - - - 19.2 Grade 3 - - - 19.3 Grade 4 - - - 19.9 Grade 5 - - - 22.4 Grade 6 - - - 21.1 Mixed Grades - - - 24.7 Secondary: English/Language Arts 10.7 - 10.7 17.8 Foreign Languages 10.1 - 10.1 19.4 Mathematics 11.5 - 11.5 18.5 Science 9.3 - 9.3 19.3

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Graduates (Class of 2009): Count Percent Group District State Total Graduates 40 100.0% - 40 264,275 By Ethnicity (incl. Special Ed.): African American 9 22.5% - 9 35,982 Hispanic 12 30.0% - 12 104,854 White 18 45.0% - 18 112,016 Native American 0 0.0% - 0 961 Asian/Pacific Islander 1 2.5% - 1 10,462 By Graduation Type (incl. Special Ed.): Minimum H.S. Program 7 17.5% - 7 46,313 Recommended H.S. Pgm./DAP 33 82.5% - 33 217,962 Special Education Graduates 6 15.0% - 6 25,929 CLASS SIZE INFORMATION (Derived from teacher responsibility records.) Campus Class Size Averages by Grade and Subject: Campus Group District State Elementary: Kindergarten - - - 19.3 Grade 1 - - - 19.1 Grade 2 - - - 19.2 Grade 3 - - - 19.3 Grade 4 - - - 19.9 Grade 5 - - - 22.4 Grade 6 - - - 21.1 Mixed Grades - - - 24.7 Secondary: English/Language Arts 10.7 - 10.7 17.8 Foreign Languages 10.1 - 10.1 19.4 Mathematics 11.5 - 11.5 18.5 Science 9.3 - 9.3 19.3 Social Studies 11.5 - 11.5 20.4


Page e247

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STAFF INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Staff: 19.7 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% Professional Staff: 19.7 100.0% - 100.0% 63.2% Teachers 11.1 56.5% - 56.5% 50.5% Professional Support 6.6 33.3% - 33.3% 8.9% Campus Admin. (School Leader.) 2.0 10.2% - 10.2% 2.8% Educational Aides: 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 9.8% Total Minority Staff: 12.7 64.4% - 64.4% 43.9% Teachers By Ethnicity and Sex: African American 4.1 37.0% - 37.0% 9.5% Hispanic 1.0 9.0% - 9.0% 22.5% White 6.0 54.0% - 54.0% 66.4% Native American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 1.3% Males 4.8 43.3% - 43.3% 23.0% Females 6.3 56.7% - 56.7% 77.0% Teachers by Years of Experience: Beginning Teachers 2.0 18.0% - 18.0% 6.0% 1-5 Years Experience 4.8 43.5% - 43.5% 31.0% 6-10 Years Experience 2.3 20.5% - 20.5% 20.3% 11-20 Years Experience 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 24.4% 0ver 20 Years Experience 2.0 18.0% - 18.0% 18.3% Campus Campus Group District State Average Years Experience of Teachers: 7.2 yrs. - yrs. 7.2 yrs. 11.3 yrs. Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 1.8 yrs. - yrs. 1.8 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers $41,494 - $41,494 $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $43,051 - $43,051 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $44,522 - $44,522 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience - - - $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience $45,842 - $45,842 $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $43,574 - $43,574 $48,263 Professional Support $28,229 - $28,229 $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $52,927 - $52,927 $70,209

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STAFF INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Staff: 19.7 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% Professional Staff: 19.7 100.0% - 100.0% 63.2% Teachers 11.1 56.5% - 56.5% 50.5% Professional Support 6.6 33.3% - 33.3% 8.9% Campus Admin. (School Leader.) 2.0 10.2% - 10.2% 2.8% Educational Aides: 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 9.8% Total Minority Staff: 12.7 64.4% - 64.4% 43.9% Teachers By Ethnicity and Sex: African American 4.1 37.0% - 37.0% 9.5% Hispanic 1.0 9.0% - 9.0% 22.5% White 6.0 54.0% - 54.0% 66.4% Native American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 1.3% Males 4.8 43.3% - 43.3% 23.0% Females 6.3 56.7% - 56.7% 77.0% Teachers by Years of Experience: Beginning Teachers 2.0 18.0% - 18.0% 6.0% 1-5 Years Experience 4.8 43.5% - 43.5% 31.0% 6-10 Years Experience 2.3 20.5% - 20.5% 20.3% 11-20 Years Experience 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 24.4% 0ver 20 Years Experience 2.0 18.0% - 18.0% 18.3% Campus Campus Group District State Average Years Experience of Teachers: 7.2 yrs. - yrs. 7.2 yrs. 11.3 yrs. Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 1.8 yrs. - yrs. 1.8 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers $41,494 - $41,494 $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $43,051 - $43,051 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $44,522 - $44,522 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience - - - $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience $45,842 - $45,842 $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $43,574 - $43,574 $48,263 Professional Support $28,229 - $28,229 $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $52,927 - $52,927 $70,209 Contracted Instructional Staff (not incl. above): 0.0 - 0.0 1,722.9


Page e248

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE INFORMATION |---------------------------Campus---------------------------| |---------Campus Group---------| (2008-09) General Percent Per All Percent Per All Percent Per Fund Student Funds Student Funds Student By Function: Total Operating Expenditures $1,062,623 100.0% $4,897 $1,220,789 100.0% $5,626 - - - Instruction (11,95) $530,632 49.9% $2,445 $665,001 54.5% $3,065 - - - Instructional-Related Services (12,13) $36,884 3.5% $170 $43,705 3.6% $201 - - - Instructional Leadership (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - School Leadership (23) $192,654 18.1% $888 $197,061 16.1% $908 - - - Support Services-Student (31,32,33) $64,950 6.1% $299 $76,730 6.3% $354 - - - Other Campus Costs (35,36,51,52,53) $237,503 22.4% $1,094 $238,292 19.5% $1,098 - - - By Program: Total Operating Expenditures $825,120 100.0% $3,802 $982,143 100.0% $4,526 - - - Bilingual/ESL Education (25) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Career & Technical Education (22) $73,135 8.9% $337 $73,135 7.4% $337 - - - Accelerated Education (24,30) $117,575 14.2% $542 $195,607 19.9% $901 - - - Gifted & Talented Education (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Regular Education (11) $585,660 71.0% $2,699 $644,721 65.6% $2,971 - - - Special Education (23) $48,750 5.9% $225 $68,680 7.0% $316 - - - Other (26,28,29) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Student Enrollment by Program: Bilingual/ESL Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.1% Career & Technical Education 71 35.3% - 35.3% 21.3% Gifted & Talented Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Special Education 15 7.5% - 7.5% 9.0% Teachers by Program (population served): Bilingual/ESL Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.0% Career & Technical Education 1.1 9.4% - 9.4% 3.9% Compensatory Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.4% Gifted & Talented Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 2.0% Regular Education 10.1 90.6% - 90.6% 71.0% Special Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 9.6% Other 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.0% '^' Primary Spring Administration, plus October first-time 11th grade testers who pass all 4 tests in October. '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (F Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 201 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 220812001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE INFORMATION |---------------------------Campus---------------------------| |---------Campus Group---------| (2008-09) General Percent Per All Percent Per All Percent Per Fund Student Funds Student Funds Student By Function: Total Operating Expenditures $1,062,623 100.0% $4,897 $1,220,789 100.0% $5,626 - - - Instruction (11,95) $530,632 49.9% $2,445 $665,001 54.5% $3,065 - - - Instructional-Related Services (12,13) $36,884 3.5% $170 $43,705 3.6% $201 - - - Instructional Leadership (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - School Leadership (23) $192,654 18.1% $888 $197,061 16.1% $908 - - - Support Services-Student (31,32,33) $64,950 6.1% $299 $76,730 6.3% $354 - - - Other Campus Costs (35,36,51,52,53) $237,503 22.4% $1,094 $238,292 19.5% $1,098 - - - By Program: Total Operating Expenditures $825,120 100.0% $3,802 $982,143 100.0% $4,526 - - - Bilingual/ESL Education (25) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Career & Technical Education (22) $73,135 8.9% $337 $73,135 7.4% $337 - - - Accelerated Education (24,30) $117,575 14.2% $542 $195,607 19.9% $901 - - - Gifted & Talented Education (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Regular Education (11) $585,660 71.0% $2,699 $644,721 65.6% $2,971 - - - Special Education (23) $48,750 5.9% $225 $68,680 7.0% $316 - - - Other (26,28,29) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Student Enrollment by Program: Bilingual/ESL Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.1% Career & Technical Education 71 35.3% - 35.3% 21.3% Gifted & Talented Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Special Education 15 7.5% - 7.5% 9.0% Teachers by Program (population served): Bilingual/ESL Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.0% Career & Technical Education 1.1 9.4% - 9.4% 3.9% Compensatory Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.4% Gifted & Talented Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 2.0% Regular Education 10.1 90.6% - 90.6% 71.0% Special Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 9.6% Other 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.0% '^' Primary Spring Administration, plus October first-time 11th grade testers who pass all 4 tests in October. '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.


Page e249

U282M110023 0023

2009-10 Academic Excellence Indicator System District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (SUBURBAN Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - SUBURBAN Campus #: 101854001 2010 Accountability Rating: AEA: Academically Acceptable This is a Charter School. Note: District at-risk completion data were used for 2010 accountability evaluation purposes.


Page e250

U282M110023 0023



Page e251

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (S Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 274 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 101854001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 9 Reading 2010 92% 64% - 64% 75% 50% * * * 62% 67% * 75% * 2009 88% 80% - 80% 83% 75% * * * 80% 80% * 79% * Mathematics 2010 72% 14% - 14% 14% 17% * * * < 1% 33% * 15% * 2009 69% 13% - 13% * 17% * * * 20% * * 14% * All Tests 2010 71% 29% - 29% 22% 25% * * * 27% 33% * 28% * 2009 67% 40% - 40% 50% 25% * * * 40% 40% * 43% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 10 Eng Lang Arts 2010 91% 53% - 53% 38% 58% * * * 35% 71% * 61% * 2009 88% 81% - 81% 83% 82% * * * 73% > 99% * 81% * Mathematics 2010 75% 13% - 13% 20% 11% * * * 7% 21% * 15% * 2009 67% 31% - 31% < 1% 47% * * * 39% 13% * 27% * Science 2010 75% 19% - 19% 27% 15% * * * 19% 20% * 19% * 2009 67% 19% - 19% 29% 13% * * * 22% 13% * 18% * Soc Studies 2010 93% 47% - 47% 36% 53% * * * 50% 38% * 44% * 2009 91% 67% - 67% 44% 80% * * * 76% 50% * 65% * All Tests 2010 66% 16% - 16% 7% 18% * * * 11% 21% * 16% * 2009 56% 21% - 21% 23% 17% * * * 26% 9% * 17% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard ^ Grade 11 Eng Lang Arts 2010 93% 53% - 53% 48% 57% * * * 41% 71% * 55% *


Page e252

U282M110023 0023

2009 93% 79% - 79% 60% 88% * * * 78% 81% * 79% * Mathematics 2010 89% 52% - 52% 23% 70% * * * 50% 55% * 53% * 2009 82% 45% - 45% 16% 59% * * * 36% 56% * 48% * Science 2010 92% 55% - 55% 22% 79% * * * 56% 55% * 57% * 2009 86% 49% - 49% 37% 53% * * * 57% 38% * 49% * Soc Studies 2010 98% 84% - 84% 70% 94% * * * 82% 86% * 84% * 2009 97% 82% - 82% 63% 92% * * * 82% 83% * 83% * All Tests 2010 83% 31% - 31% 10% 47% * * * 28% 35% * 30% *

2009 93% 79% - 79% 60% 88% * * * 78% 81% * 79% * Mathematics 2010 89% 52% - 52% 23% 70% * * * 50% 55% * 53% * 2009 82% 45% - 45% 16% 59% * * * 36% 56% * 48% * Science 2010 92% 55% - 55% 22% 79% * * * 56% 55% * 57% * 2009 86% 49% - 49% 37% 53% * * * 57% 38% * 49% * Soc Studies 2010 98% 84% - 84% 70% 94% * * * 82% 86% * 84% * 2009 97% 82% - 82% 63% 92% * * * 82% 83% * 83% * All Tests 2010 83% 31% - 31% 10% 47% * * * 28% 35% * 30% * 2009 76% 37% - 37% 16% 43% * * * 37% 36% * 38% *


Page e253

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (S Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 274 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 101854001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 55% - 55% 50% 56% * * * 44% 70% 33% 60% * 2009 88% 80% - 80% 71% 85% 86% * * 76% 86% 33% 80% * Mathematics 2010 84% 35% - 35% 21% 45% * * * 32% 40% 20% 36% * 2009 80% 38% - 38% 10% 52% * * * 36% 42% < 1% 39% * Science 2010 83% 42% - 42% 24% 55% * * * 44% 41% * 42% * 2009 78% 40% - 40% 35% 41% * * * 45% 31% * 39% * Soc Studies 2010 95% 71% - 71% 59% 79% * * * 72% 69% * 70% * 2009 93% 77% - 77% 57% 88% * * * 80% 74% * 77% * All Tests 2010 77% 26% - 26% 11% 34% 60% * * 24% 30% 14% 25% * 2009 72% 33% - 33% 23% 35% 71% * * 34% 31% 13% 33% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard with TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 96% 65% - 65% 58% 68% * * * 56% 76% 33% 67% * 2009 95% 84% - 84% 71% 91% 86% * * 81% 88% 50% 84% * Mathematics 2010 91% 38% - 38% 23% 48% * * * 35% 43% 20% 38% * 2009 88% 47% - 47% 14% 64% * * * 46% 47% < 1% 48% * Science 2010 92% 47% - 47% 29% 58% * * * 48% 46% * 48% * 2009 83% 49% - 49% 35% 56% * * * 57% 38% * 49% * Soc Studies 2010 99% 84% - 84% 74% 90% * * * 80% 89% * 83% * 2009 98% 83% - 83% 71% 90% * * * 86% 79% * 84% * All Tests 2010 88% 29% - 29% 15% 37% 60% * * 25% 35% 14% 29% * 2009 82% 42% - 42% 25% 49% 71% * * 45% 37% 13% 42% *


Page e254

U282M110023 0023

TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% * * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * 2009 31% 3% - 3% < 1% 5% < 1% * * 4% < 1% < 1% 3% * Mathematics 2010 29% 3% - 3% < 1% 5% * * * 2% 5% < 1% 2% * 2009 28% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% * * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * Science 2010 28% 1% - 1% < 1% 2% * * * 2% < 1% * 1% * 2009 26% 1% - 1% < 1% < 1% * * * 2% < 1% * < 1% * Soc Studies 2010 47% 12% - 12% 3% 17% * * * 16% 6% * 13% * 2009 44% 7% - 7% 7% 6% * * * 12% < 1% * 6% * All Tests 2010 15% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% *

TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% * * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * 2009 31% 3% - 3% < 1% 5% < 1% * * 4% < 1% < 1% 3% * Mathematics 2010 29% 3% - 3% < 1% 5% * * * 2% 5% < 1% 2% * 2009 28% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% * * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * Science 2010 28% 1% - 1% < 1% 2% * * * 2% < 1% * 1% * 2009 26% 1% - 1% < 1% < 1% * * * 2% < 1% * < 1% * Soc Studies 2010 47% 12% - 12% 3% 17% * * * 16% 6% * 13% * 2009 44% 7% - 7% 7% 6% * * * 12% < 1% * 6% * All Tests 2010 15% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * 2009 15% 1% - 1% < 1% 1% < 1% * * 1% < 1% < 1% 1% *


Page e255

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (S Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 274 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 101854001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Progress (Sum of All Grades Tested) (AEA Indicator) 2010 85% 69% - 69% 61% 74% * * * 67% 72% 42% 70% * 2009 81% 77% - 77% 66% 83% 75% * * 78% 76% 23% 77% * TAKS-M Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 85% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 75% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 69% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 58% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 51% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 67% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 64% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 64% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 57% * - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 55% - 55% 50% 56% * * * 44% 69% 38% 61% * 2009 88% 81% - 81% 72% 85% 86% * * 77% 86% 56% 80% * Mathematics 2010 84% 36% - 36% 24% 45% * * * 33% 41% 38% 37% * 2009 80% 39% - 39% 13% 52% * * * 35% 45% 25% 40% * Science 2010 82% 42% - 42% 24% 55% * * * 45% 38% 14% 42% * 2009 77% 39% - 39% 33% 39% * * * 44% 29% < 1% 38% *


Page e256

U282M110023 0023

Soc Studies 2010 94% 70% - 70% 57% 79% * * * 73% 65% 29% 69% * 2009 92% 77% - 77% 59% 87% * * * 80% 72% 43% 77% * All Tests 2010 76% 26% - 26% 11% 34% 60% * * 24% 29% 11% 25% * 2009 71% 32% - 32% 22% 35% 71% * * 34% 29% 9% 32% * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% * * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% *

Soc Studies 2010 94% 70% - 70% 57% 79% * * * 73% 65% 29% 69% * 2009 92% 77% - 77% 59% 87% * * * 80% 72% 43% 77% * All Tests 2010 76% 26% - 26% 11% 34% 60% * * 24% 29% 11% 25% * 2009 71% 32% - 32% 22% 35% 71% * * 34% 29% 9% 32% * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% * * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * Mathematics 2010 28% 3% - 3% < 1% 5% * * * 2% 5% < 1% 2% *


Page e257

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (S Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 274 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 101854001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP 2010 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.6% 94.3% - 94.3% 93.6% 94.8% 100.0% * * 96.9% 92.0% 96.3% 94.4% * By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 86.1% - 86.1% 81.9% 89.6% 80.0% * * 90.7% 81.3% 22.2% 86.7% * Not on TAKS 7.8% 8.2% - 8.2% 11.7% 5.2% 20.0% * * 6.2% 10.7% 74.1% 7.7% * TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 5.7% - 5.7% 7.4% 4.5% 10.0% * * 3.9% 8.0% 51.9% 5.1% * TAKS-M Only 3.3% 2.0% - 2.0% 3.2% 0.7% 10.0% * * 1.6% 2.7% 18.5% 2.1% * TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * Combination 1.3% 0.4% - 0.4% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.8% 0.0% 3.7% 0.5% * By Acct Status Acct System 90.0% 51.0% - 51.0% 56.4% 49.3% 50.0% * * 55.8% 46.4% 25.9% 51.8% * Non-Acct System 8.6% 43.3% - 43.3% 37.2% 45.5% 50.0% * * 41.1% 45.5% 70.4% 42.6% * Mobile 4.4% 41.2% - 41.2% 34.0% 44.8% 40.0% * * 39.5% 42.9% 51.9% 40.5% * Non-Acct Test 4.2% 2.0% - 2.0% 3.2% 0.7% 10.0% * * 1.6% 2.7% 18.5% 2.1% * Not Tested 1.4% 5.7% - 5.7% 6.4% 5.2% 0.0% * * 3.1% 8.0% 3.7% 5.6% * Absent 0.1% 0.4% - 0.4% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% * * 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% * LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * Other 0.4% 5.3% - 5.3% 6.4% 4.5% 0.0% * * 2.3% 8.0% 3.7% 5.1% * Total Count 3,175,337 245 - 245 94 134 10 4 1 129 112 27 195 1 2009 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.5% 92.1% - 92.1% 88.5% 95.5% 91.7% - - 93.4% 90.6% 100.0% 92.2% * By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 88.4% - 88.4% 83.3% 92.0% 91.7% - - 89.7% 86.8% 40.0% 88.0% * Not on TAKS 7.7% 3.7% - 3.7% 5.2% 3.6% 0.0% - - 3.7% 3.8% 60.0% 4.2% *


Page e258

U282M110023 0023

TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 1.7% - 1.7% 2.1% 1.8% 0.0% - - 2.2% 0.9% 26.7% 1.6% * TAKS-M Only 3.3% 1.7% - 1.7% 2.1% 1.8% 0.0% - - 1.5% 1.9% 26.7% 2.1% * TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * Combination 1.3% 0.4% - 0.4% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.9% 6.7% 0.5% * By Acct Status Acct System 87.3% 45.9% - 45.9% 40.6% 57.1% 58.3% - - 51.5% 38.7% 33.3% 47.9% * Non-Acct System 11.2% 46.3% - 46.3% 47.9% 38.4% 33.3% - - 41.9% 51.9% 66.7% 44.3% * Mobile 4.7% 43.0% - 43.0% 43.8% 34.8% 33.3% - - 39.0% 48.1% 20.0% 40.1% * Non-Acct Test 6.4% 2.9% - 2.9% 3.1% 3.6% 0.0% - - 2.2% 3.8% 46.7% 3.6% * Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Not Tested 1.5% 7.9% - 7.9% 11.5% 4.5% 8.3% - - 6.6% 9.4% 0.0% 7.8% * Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * Other 0.4% 7.9% - 7.9% 11.5% 4.5% 8.3% - - 6.6% 9.4% 0.0% 7.8% * Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 1.7% - 1.7% 2.1% 1.8% 0.0% - - 2.2% 0.9% 26.7% 1.6% * TAKS-M Only 3.3% 1.7% - 1.7% 2.1% 1.8% 0.0% - - 1.5% 1.9% 26.7% 2.1% * TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * Combination 1.3% 0.4% - 0.4% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.9% 6.7% 0.5% * By Acct Status Acct System 87.3% 45.9% - 45.9% 40.6% 57.1% 58.3% - - 51.5% 38.7% 33.3% 47.9% * Non-Acct System 11.2% 46.3% - 46.3% 47.9% 38.4% 33.3% - - 41.9% 51.9% 66.7% 44.3% * Mobile 4.7% 43.0% - 43.0% 43.8% 34.8% 33.3% - - 39.0% 48.1% 20.0% 40.1% * Non-Acct Test 6.4% 2.9% - 2.9% 3.1% 3.6% 0.0% - - 2.2% 3.8% 46.7% 3.6% * Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Not Tested 1.5% 7.9% - 7.9% 11.5% 4.5% 8.3% - - 6.6% 9.4% 0.0% 7.8% * Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * Other 0.4% 7.9% - 7.9% 11.5% 4.5% 8.3% - - 6.6% 9.4% 0.0% 7.8% * Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Count 3,132,150 242 - 242 96 112 12 0 0 136 106 15 192 4


Page e259

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 5 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (S Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 274 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 101854001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers Percent of Failers Passing TAKS (Sum of Grades 4-11) Reading/ELA 2010 57% 9% - 9% 17% < 1% * * * 13% * * < 1% * 2009 43% 75% - 75% 67% * * * * 70% * * 78% * Mathematics 2010 43% 33% - 33% 25% 40% * * * 36% 29% * 34% * 2009 36% 34% - 34% 17% 48% * * * 32% 40% * 31% * Attendance Rate 2008-09 95.6% 84.6% - 84.6% 84.0% 85.5% 81.0% - * 86.1% 82.5% 84.7% 85.4% - 2007-08 95.5% 79.7% - 79.7% 80.3% 80.1% 73.9% * * 79.6% 79.8% 77.5% 81.1% - Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 7-12) (AEA Indicator) 2008-09 2.0% 26.2% - 26.2% 30.4% 22.1% 26.5% - * 23.4% 29.8% 25.0% 26.2% - 2007-08 2.2% 37.6% - 37.6% 43.6% 32.0% 42.9% * 40.0% 35.0% 40.6% 33.3% 31.5% - 4-Year Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2009 Graduated 80.6% 14.1% - 14.1% 16.0% 12.5% 15.4% - * 13.1% 15.2% 33.3% 13.3% - Received GED 1.4% 3.1% - 3.1% 2.7% 2.8% 7.7% - * 3.6% 2.5% 16.7% 2.7% - Continued HS 8.6% 27.6% - 27.6% 24.0% 33.3% 15.4% - * 33.3% 21.5% 0.0% 42.7% - Dropped Out 9.4% 55.2% - 55.2% 57.3% 51.4% 61.5% - * 50.0% 60.8% 50.0% 41.3% - Class of 2008 Graduated 79.1% 18.9% - 18.9% 18.1% 21.0% 0.0% - * 13.2% 23.9% 12.5% 21.1% - Received GED 1.5% 1.2% - 1.2% 0.0% 2.5% 0.0% - * 0.0% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% - Continued HS 8.9% 23.8% - 23.8% 13.9% 33.3% 22.2% - * 26.3% 21.6% 25.0% 30.5% - Dropped Out 10.5% 56.1% - 56.1% 68.1% 43.2% 77.8% - * 60.5% 52.3% 62.5% 48.4% -


Page e260

U282M110023 0023

5-Year Extended Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2008 Graduated 83.4% 23.6% - 23.6% 20.3% 27.1% 15.4% - * 17.9% 28.1% 20.0% 27.7% - Received GED 2.1% 4.0% - 4.0% 2.7% 4.7% 7.7% - * 2.6% 5.2% 0.0% 4.0% - Continued HS 2.4% 7.5% - 7.5% 4.1% 11.8% 0.0% - * 9.0% 6.3% 10.0% 8.9% - Dropped Out 12.2% 64.9% - 64.9% 73.0% 56.5% 76.9% - * 70.5% 60.4% 70.0% 59.4% - Completion Rate II (Graduates, Continuers, and GED) (AEA Indicator) Class of 2009 90.6% 44.8% - 44.8% 42.7% 48.6% 38.5% - * 50.0% 39.2% 50.0% 58.7% - Class of 2008 89.5% 43.9% - 43.9% 31.9% 56.8% 22.2% - * 39.5% 47.7% 37.5% 51.6% - Completion Rate I (Graduates and Continuers) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Class of 2009 89.2% 41.7% - 41.7% 40.0% 45.8% 30.8% - * 46.4% 36.7% 33.3% 56.0% - Class of 2008 88.0% 42.7% - 42.7% 31.9% 54.3% 22.2% - * 39.5% 45.5% 37.5% 51.6% - COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 1.6% - 1.6% 1.3% 2.1% 0.0% - - 2.4% 0.6% 0.0% 2.2% -

5-Year Extended Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2008 Graduated 83.4% 23.6% - 23.6% 20.3% 27.1% 15.4% - * 17.9% 28.1% 20.0% 27.7% - Received GED 2.1% 4.0% - 4.0% 2.7% 4.7% 7.7% - * 2.6% 5.2% 0.0% 4.0% - Continued HS 2.4% 7.5% - 7.5% 4.1% 11.8% 0.0% - * 9.0% 6.3% 10.0% 8.9% - Dropped Out 12.2% 64.9% - 64.9% 73.0% 56.5% 76.9% - * 70.5% 60.4% 70.0% 59.4% - Completion Rate II (Graduates, Continuers, and GED) (AEA Indicator) Class of 2009 90.6% 44.8% - 44.8% 42.7% 48.6% 38.5% - * 50.0% 39.2% 50.0% 58.7% - Class of 2008 89.5% 43.9% - 43.9% 31.9% 56.8% 22.2% - * 39.5% 47.7% 37.5% 51.6% - Completion Rate I (Graduates and Continuers) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Class of 2009 89.2% 41.7% - 41.7% 40.0% 45.8% 30.8% - * 46.4% 36.7% 33.3% 56.0% - Class of 2008 88.0% 42.7% - 42.7% 31.9% 54.3% 22.2% - * 39.5% 45.5% 37.5% 51.6% - COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 1.6% - 1.6% 1.3% 2.1% 0.0% - - 2.4% 0.6% 0.0% 2.2% - 2007-08 23.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -


Page e261

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 6 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (S Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 274 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 101854001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP RHSP/DAP Graduates Class of 2009 82.5% 22.7% - 22.7% 5.9% 30.4% * - - 25.0% 20.0% * 13.6% - Class of 2008 81.4% 26.8% - 26.8% 12.5% 40.9% * - * 16.7% 31.0% - 31.6% - AP/IB Results Tested 2009 21.2% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a 2008 20.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a Examinees >= Criterion 2009 51.2% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 50.1% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Scores >= Criterion 2009 47.4% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 46.0% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Texas Success Initiative (TSI) – Higher Education Readiness Component Eng Lang Arts 2010 60% 17% - 17% 17% 18% * * * 18% 17% * 18% * 2009 63% 27% - 27% 10% 33% * * * 31% 22% * 23% * Mathematics 2010 66% 14% - 14% < 1% 24% * * * 12% 18% * 13% * 2009 62% 17% - 17% < 1% 24% * * * 9% 28% * 19% * College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% 63% - 63% 44% 83% * * * 67% 57% * 64% * Class of 2008 59% 31% - 31% 33% 29% * * * * 33% * 13% * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% 22% - 22% 11% 29% * * * 30% 13% * 18% *


Page e262

U282M110023 0023

Class of 2008 58% 15% - 15% 14% 8% * * * 25% 8% * 11% * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% 19% - 19% < 1% 33% * * * 22% 14% * 9% *

Class of 2008 58% 15% - 15% 14% 8% * * * 25% 8% * 11% * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% 19% - 19% < 1% 33% * * * 22% 14% * 9% * Class of 2008 44% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% * * * * < 1% * < 1% *


Page e263

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (S Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 274 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 101854001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Students: 274 100.0% - 274 4,824,778 Students By Grade: Early Childhood Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Pre-Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 4.4% Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 1 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.9% Grade 2 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.8% Grade 3 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.7% Grade 4 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 5 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.5% Grade 6 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 7 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 8 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.2% Grade 9 54 19.7% - 19.7% 8.1% Grade 10 63 23.0% - 23.0% 6.9% Grade 11 81 29.6% - 29.6% 6.4% Grade 12 76 27.7% - 27.7% 5.9% Ethnic Distribution: African American 115 42.0% - 42.0% 14.0% Hispanic 145 52.9% - 52.9% 48.6% White 12 4.4% - 4.4% 33.3% Native American 1 0.4% - 0.4% 0.4% Asian/Pac. Islander 1 0.4% - 0.4% 3.7% Economically Disadvantaged 214 78.1% - 78.1% 59.0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.9% Students w/Disciplinary Placements (2008-09) 221 49.6% - 49.6% 13.4% At-Risk 210 76.6% - 76.6% 47.2%

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (S Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 274 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 101854001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Students: 274 100.0% - 274 4,824,778 Students By Grade: Early Childhood Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Pre-Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 4.4% Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 1 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.9% Grade 2 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.8% Grade 3 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.7% Grade 4 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 5 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.5% Grade 6 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 7 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 8 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.2% Grade 9 54 19.7% - 19.7% 8.1% Grade 10 63 23.0% - 23.0% 6.9% Grade 11 81 29.6% - 29.6% 6.4% Grade 12 76 27.7% - 27.7% 5.9% Ethnic Distribution: African American 115 42.0% - 42.0% 14.0% Hispanic 145 52.9% - 52.9% 48.6% White 12 4.4% - 4.4% 33.3% Native American 1 0.4% - 0.4% 0.4% Asian/Pac. Islander 1 0.4% - 0.4% 3.7% Economically Disadvantaged 214 78.1% - 78.1% 59.0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.9% Students w/Disciplinary Placements (2008-09) 221 49.6% - 49.6% 13.4% At-Risk 210 76.6% - 76.6% 47.2%


Page e264

U282M110023 0023

Mobility (2008-09) 340 76.2% - 76.2% 18.9% Number of Students per Teacher 19.7 n/a - 19.7 14.5


Page e265

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (S Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 274 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 101854001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Graduates (Class of 2009): Count Percent Group District State Total Graduates 44 100.0% - 44 264,275 By Ethnicity (incl. Special Ed.): African American 17 38.6% - 17 35,982 Hispanic 23 52.3% - 23 104,854 White 4 9.1% - 4 112,016 Native American 0 0.0% - 0 961 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0.0% - 0 10,462 By Graduation Type (incl. Special Ed.): Minimum H.S. Program 34 77.3% - 34 46,313 Recommended H.S. Pgm./DAP 10 22.7% - 10 217,962 Special Education Graduates 4 9.1% - 4 25,929 CLASS SIZE INFORMATION (Derived from teacher responsibility records.) Campus Class Size Averages by Grade and Subject: Campus Group District State Elementary: Kindergarten - - - 19.3 Grade 1 - - - 19.1 Grade 2 - - - 19.2 Grade 3 - - - 19.3 Grade 4 - - - 19.9 Grade 5 - - - 22.4 Grade 6 - - - 21.1 Mixed Grades - - - 24.7 Secondary: English/Language Arts 11.3 - 11.3 17.8


Page e266

U282M110023 0023

Foreign Languages 15.0 - 15.0 19.4 Mathematics 10.7 - 10.7 18.5 Science 10.2 - 10.2 19.3

Foreign Languages 15.0 - 15.0 19.4 Mathematics 10.7 - 10.7 18.5 Science 10.2 - 10.2 19.3 Social Studies 10.9 - 10.9 20.4


Page e267

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (S Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 274 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 101854001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STAFF INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Staff: 18.9 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% Professional Staff: 16.9 89.4% - 72.7% 63.2% Teachers 13.9 73.6% - 59.8% 50.5% Professional Support 1.0 5.3% - 4.3% 8.9% Campus Admin. (School Leader.) 2.0 10.6% - 8.6% 2.8% Educational Aides: 2.0 10.6% - 8.6% 9.8% Total Minority Staff: 14.9 78.9% - 76.4% 43.9% Teachers By Ethnicity and Sex: African American 4.0 28.6% - 28.6% 9.5% Hispanic 6.0 42.7% - 42.7% 22.5% White 3.0 21.5% - 21.5% 66.4% Native American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 1.0 7.2% - 7.2% 1.3% Males 7.0 49.9% - 49.9% 23.0% Females 7.0 50.1% - 50.1% 77.0% Teachers by Years of Experience: Beginning Teachers 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 6.0% 1-5 Years Experience 9.9 71.3% - 71.3% 31.0% 6-10 Years Experience 1.0 7.2% - 7.2% 20.3% 11-20 Years Experience 2.0 14.4% - 14.4% 24.4% 0ver 20 Years Experience 1.0 7.2% - 7.2% 18.3% Campus Campus Group District State Average Years Experience of Teachers: 6.5 yrs. - yrs. 6.5 yrs. 11.3 yrs.


Page e268

U282M110023 0023

Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 2.4 yrs. - yrs. 2.4 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers - - - $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $39,913 - $39,913 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $38,301 - $38,301 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience $45,854 - $45,854 $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience $45,443 - $45,443 $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $41,047 - $41,047 $48,263 Professional Support $46,897 - $46,897 $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $64,183 - $64,183 $70,209

Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 2.4 yrs. - yrs. 2.4 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers - - - $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $39,913 - $39,913 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $38,301 - $38,301 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience $45,854 - $45,854 $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience $45,443 - $45,443 $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $41,047 - $41,047 $48,263 Professional Support $46,897 - $46,897 $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $64,183 - $64,183 $70,209 Contracted Instructional Staff (not incl. above): 0.0 - 0.0 1,722.9


Page e269

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (S Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 274 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY - 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 101854001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE INFORMATION |---------------------------Campus---------------------------| |---------Campus Group---------| (2008-09) General Percent Per All Percent Per All Percent Per Fund Student Funds Student Funds Student By Function: Total Operating Expenditures $1,287,390 100.0% $5,320 $1,548,886 100.0% $6,400 - - - Instruction (11,95) $500,117 38.8% $2,067 $716,578 46.3% $2,961 - - - Instructional-Related Services (12,13) $35,735 2.8% $148 $76,253 4.9% $315 - - - Instructional Leadership (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - School Leadership (23) $261,304 20.3% $1,080 $263,304 17.0% $1,088 - - - Support Services-Student (31,32,33) $69,213 5.4% $286 $69,413 4.5% $287 - - - Other Campus Costs (35,36,51,52,53) $421,021 32.7% $1,740 $423,338 27.3% $1,749 - - - By Program: Total Operating Expenditures $866,369 100.0% $3,580 $1,125,548 100.0% $4,651 - - - Bilingual/ESL Education (25) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Career & Technical Education (22) $41,771 4.8% $173 $41,771 3.7% $173 - - - Accelerated Education (24,30) $183,823 21.2% $760 $345,068 30.7% $1,426 - - - Gifted & Talented Education (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Regular Education (11) $637,217 73.6% $2,633 $716,391 63.6% $2,960 - - - Special Education (23) $3,558 0.4% $15 $22,318 2.0% $92 - - - Other (26,28,29) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Student Enrollment by Program: Bilingual/ESL Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.1% Career & Technical Education 165 60.2% - 60.2% 21.3% Gifted & Talented Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Special Education 12 4.4% - 4.4% 9.0%


Page e270

U282M110023 0023

Teachers by Program (population served): Bilingual/ESL Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.0% Career & Technical Education 2.3 16.7% - 16.7% 3.9% Compensatory Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.4% Gifted & Talented Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 2.0% Regular Education 11.6 83.3% - 83.3% 71.0% Special Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 9.6% Other 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.0% '^' Primary Spring Administration, plus October first-time 11th grade testers who pass all 4 tests in October. '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.



Page e271

U282M110023 0023

2009-10 Academic Excellence Indicator System District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH SCHOOL Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S (CORPUS Campus #: 178804001 2010 Accountability Rating: AEA: Academically Acceptable This is a Charter School.


Page e272

U282M110023 0023



Page e273

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 266 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 178804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 9 Reading 2010 92% 94% - 94% * 92% > 99% * * 88% > 99% * 90% * 2009 88% 69% - 69% * 70% 60% * * 64% 80% * 60% * Mathematics 2010 72% 14% - 14% * 14% * * * 15% 13% * 6% * 2009 69% 25% - 25% * 20% 40% * * 18% 40% * 10% * All Tests 2010 71% 26% - 26% * 24% 50% * * 35% 18% * 19% * 2009 67% 25% - 25% * 20% 40% * * 18% 40% * 10% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 10 Eng Lang Arts 2010 91% > 99% - > 99% * > 99% > 99% * * > 99% > 99% * > 99% * 2009 88% 75% - 75% 80% 70% > 99% * * 71% 80% * 72% * Mathematics 2010 75% 89% - 89% * 92% 86% * * 80% > 99% * 85% * 2009 67% 40% - 40% * 39% 67% * * 41% 39% * 31% * Science 2010 75% 74% - 74% * 67% 86% * * 70% 78% * 69% * 2009 67% 43% - 43% * 39% 80% * * 45% 39% * 37% * Soc Studies 2010 93% > 99% - > 99% * > 99% > 99% * * > 99% > 99% * > 99% * 2009 91% 79% - 79% * 80% > 99% * * 81% 76% * 74% * All Tests 2010 66% 77% - 77% * 69% 88% * * 75% 80% * 71% * 2009 56% 33% - 33% 40% 27% 71% * * 35% 30% * 29% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard ^ Grade 11 Eng Lang Arts 2010 93% 84% - 84% * 80% > 99% * * 83% 86% * 89% *


Page e274

U282M110023 0023

2009 93% 83% - 83% * 93% 69% * * 88% 75% * 87% * Mathematics 2010 89% 48% - 48% * 40% 73% * * 56% 36% * 38% * 2009 82% 36% - 36% * 14% 54% * * 35% 36% * 29% * Science 2010 92% 66% - 66% * 64% 73% * * 81% 44% * 54% * 2009 86% 63% - 63% * 57% 75% * * 69% 55% * 57% * Soc Studies 2010 98% 94% - 94% * 91% > 99% * * > 99% 84% * 89% * 2009 97% 85% - 85% * 93% 75% * * 82% 90% * 92% * All Tests 2010 83% 43% - 43% * 34% 69% * * 51% 32% * 36% *

2009 93% 83% - 83% * 93% 69% * * 88% 75% * 87% * Mathematics 2010 89% 48% - 48% * 40% 73% * * 56% 36% * 38% * 2009 82% 36% - 36% * 14% 54% * * 35% 36% * 29% * Science 2010 92% 66% - 66% * 64% 73% * * 81% 44% * 54% * 2009 86% 63% - 63% * 57% 75% * * 69% 55% * 57% * Soc Studies 2010 98% 94% - 94% * 91% > 99% * * > 99% 84% * 89% * 2009 97% 85% - 85% * 93% 75% * * 82% 90% * 92% * All Tests 2010 83% 43% - 43% * 34% 69% * * 51% 32% * 36% * 2009 76% 17% - 17% * 13% 23% * * 24% 8% * 13% *


Page e275

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 266 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 178804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 90% - 90% 80% 87% > 99% * * 87% 93% * 92% * 2009 88% 76% - 76% 86% 75% 76% * * 75% 78% * 73% * Mathematics 2010 84% 46% - 46% * 41% 69% * * 51% 40% * 38% * 2009 80% 36% - 36% 20% 31% 54% * * 35% 38% * 27% * Science 2010 83% 68% - 68% * 65% 77% * * 78% 53% * 58% * 2009 78% 50% - 50% * 44% 76% * * 53% 45% * 43% * Soc Studies 2010 95% 95% - 95% * 93% > 99% * * > 99% 88% * 92% * 2009 93% 81% - 81% * 83% 82% * * 81% 81% * 79% * All Tests 2010 77% 45% - 45% 40% 36% 70% * * 52% 36% 40% 38% * 2009 72% 27% - 27% 29% 23% 40% * * 29% 24% * 23% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard with TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 96% 92% - 92% 80% 89% > 99% * * 90% 93% * 94% * 2009 95% 90% - 90% > 99% 91% 84% * * 92% 86% * 91% * Mathematics 2010 91% 58% - 58% * 53% 73% * * 61% 54% * 50% * 2009 88% 45% - 45% 40% 40% 58% * * 42% 50% * 34% * Science 2010 92% 73% - 73% * 72% 77% * * 83% 59% * 64% * 2009 83% 61% - 61% * 58% 76% * * 64% 55% * 55% * Soc Studies 2010 99% 95% - 95% * 93% > 99% * * > 99% 88% * 92% * 2009 98% 95% - 95% * 98% 82% * * 94% 96% * 98% * All Tests 2010 88% 58% - 58% 60% 52% 73% * * 62% 53% 40% 51% * 2009 82% 41% - 41% 43% 40% 44% * * 43% 38% * 35% *


Page e276

U282M110023 0023

TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% 10% - 10% < 1% 7% 21% * * 8% 13% * 4% * 2009 31% 9% - 9% < 1% 10% 8% * * 8% 11% * 6% * Mathematics 2010 29% 2% - 2% * < 1% 8% * * 2% 2% * 3% * 2009 28% 3% - 3% < 1% 5% < 1% * * 2% 6% * 3% * Science 2010 28% 1% - 1% * < 1% 5% * * < 1% 3% * 2% * 2009 26% 3% - 3% * 4% < 1% * * 4% < 1% * 2% * Soc Studies 2010 47% 19% - 19% * 12% 35% * * 23% 12% * 18% * 2009 44% 11% - 11% * 7% 24% * * 10% 11% * 4% * All Tests 2010 15% 1% - 1% < 1% < 1% 3% * * 2% < 1% < 1% < 1% *

TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% 10% - 10% < 1% 7% 21% * * 8% 13% * 4% * 2009 31% 9% - 9% < 1% 10% 8% * * 8% 11% * 6% * Mathematics 2010 29% 2% - 2% * < 1% 8% * * 2% 2% * 3% * 2009 28% 3% - 3% < 1% 5% < 1% * * 2% 6% * 3% * Science 2010 28% 1% - 1% * < 1% 5% * * < 1% 3% * 2% * 2009 26% 3% - 3% * 4% < 1% * * 4% < 1% * 2% * Soc Studies 2010 47% 19% - 19% * 12% 35% * * 23% 12% * 18% * 2009 44% 11% - 11% * 7% 24% * * 10% 11% * 4% * All Tests 2010 15% 1% - 1% < 1% < 1% 3% * * 2% < 1% < 1% < 1% * 2009 15% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% * < 1% *


Page e277

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 266 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 178804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Progress (Sum of All Grades Tested) (AEA Indicator) 2010 85% 92% - 92% 73% 92% 93% * * 92% 91% 82% 91% * 2009 81% 84% - 84% 79% 84% 87% * * 83% 86% 88% 80% * TAKS-M Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 85% 88% - 88% * 82% > 99% * * 82% > 99% 88% 82% * 2009 82% 71% - 71% * 71% * * * 60% * 71% * * Mathematics 2010 75% 82% - 82% * 91% 67% * * 77% * 82% 90% * 2009 69% 78% - 78% * 75% * * * 71% * 78% * * Science 2010 58% 71% - 71% * 63% 83% * * 73% * 71% 63% * 2009 51% 86% - 86% * 86% * * * 80% * 86% * * Soc Studies 2010 67% 67% - 67% * 57% 80% * * 80% * 67% 57% * 2009 64% 83% - 83% * 83% * * * * * 83% * * All Tests 2010 64% 58% - 58% * 54% 67% * * 54% 67% 58% 50% * 2009 57% 60% - 60% * 56% * * * 50% * 60% 40% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 90% - 90% 80% 86% > 99% * * 86% 93% 85% 90% * 2009 88% 76% - 76% 86% 75% 76% * * 74% 79% 55% 73% * Mathematics 2010 84% 51% - 51% * 47% 69% * * 56% 44% 70% 45% * 2009 80% 40% - 40% 20% 36% 56% * * 39% 42% 73% 30% * Science 2010 82% 68% - 68% * 65% 79% * * 77% 54% 63% 59% * 2009 77% 53% - 53% * 48% 76% * * 56% 48% 89% 44% *


Page e278

U282M110023 0023

Soc Studies 2010 94% 91% - 91% * 89% 96% * * 96% 83% 75% 88% * 2009 92% 81% - 81% * 83% 82% * * 81% 83% 88% 80% * All Tests 2010 76% 46% - 46% 40% 38% 69% * * 51% 38% 50% 39% * 2009 71% 30% - 30% 29% 26% 42% * * 31% 28% 46% 23% * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% 11% - 11% < 1% 9% 18% * * 8% 15% 15% 7% *

Soc Studies 2010 94% 91% - 91% * 89% 96% * * 96% 83% 75% 88% * 2009 92% 81% - 81% * 83% 82% * * 81% 83% 88% 80% * All Tests 2010 76% 46% - 46% 40% 38% 69% * * 51% 38% 50% 39% * 2009 71% 30% - 30% 29% 26% 42% * * 31% 28% 46% 23% * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% 11% - 11% < 1% 9% 18% * * 8% 15% 15% 7% * Mathematics 2010 28% 4% - 4% * 2% 9% * * 4% 4% 15% 4% *


Page e279

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 266 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 178804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP 2010 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.6% 99.5% - 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% - * 99.2% 100.0% 97.0% 99.3% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 84.9% - 84.9% 100.0% 84.6% 83.6% - * 82.0% 89.3% 3.0% 83.0% - Not on TAKS 7.8% 14.6% - 14.6% 0.0% 15.4% 14.8% - * 17.2% 10.7% 93.9% 16.3% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 0.9% - 0.9% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% - * 1.6% 0.0% 6.1% 1.5% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 10.4% - 10.4% 0.0% 10.5% 11.5% - * 12.5% 7.1% 66.7% 11.1% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 3.3% - 3.3% 0.0% 3.5% 3.3% - * 3.1% 3.6% 21.2% 3.7% - By Acct Status Acct System 90.0% 57.1% - 57.1% 71.4% 59.4% 49.2% - * 51.6% 65.5% 15.2% 54.8% - Non-Acct System 8.6% 42.5% - 42.5% 28.6% 40.6% 49.2% - * 47.7% 34.5% 81.8% 44.4% - Mobile 4.4% 32.1% - 32.1% 28.6% 30.1% 37.7% - * 35.2% 27.4% 15.2% 33.3% - Non-Acct Test 4.2% 10.4% - 10.4% 0.0% 10.5% 11.5% - * 12.5% 7.1% 66.7% 11.1% - Not Tested 1.4% 0.5% - 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% - * 0.8% 0.0% 3.0% 0.7% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 0.5% - 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% - * 0.8% 0.0% 3.0% 0.7% - Total Count 3,175,337 212 - 212 7 143 61 0 1 128 84 33 135 0 2009 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.5% 98.5% - 98.5% 100.0% 99.3% 95.7% - - 99.2% 97.4% 96.9% 98.4% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 87.4% - 87.4% 88.9% 85.9% 93.5% - - 85.1% 90.9% 28.1% 88.0% - Not on TAKS 7.7% 11.1% - 11.1% 11.1% 13.4% 2.2% - - 14.0% 6.5% 68.8% 10.4% -


Page e280

U282M110023 0023

TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 2.5% - 2.5% 11.1% 2.8% 0.0% - - 3.3% 1.3% 15.6% 3.2% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 7.1% - 7.1% 0.0% 8.5% 2.2% - - 9.1% 3.9% 43.8% 5.6% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 1.5% - 1.5% 0.0% 2.1% 0.0% - - 1.7% 1.3% 9.4% 1.6% - By Acct Status Acct System 87.3% 51.0% - 51.0% 77.8% 48.6% 54.3% - - 52.9% 48.1% 12.5% 52.0% - Non-Acct System 11.2% 47.5% - 47.5% 22.2% 50.7% 41.3% - - 46.3% 49.4% 84.4% 46.4% - Mobile 4.7% 38.4% - 38.4% 11.1% 40.1% 39.1% - - 34.7% 44.2% 28.1% 37.6% - Non-Acct Test 6.4% 9.1% - 9.1% 11.1% 10.6% 2.2% - - 11.6% 5.2% 56.3% 8.8% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Not Tested 1.5% 1.5% - 1.5% 0.0% 0.7% 4.3% - - 0.8% 2.6% 3.1% 1.6% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 1.5% - 1.5% 0.0% 0.7% 4.3% - - 0.8% 2.6% 3.1% 1.6% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 2.5% - 2.5% 11.1% 2.8% 0.0% - - 3.3% 1.3% 15.6% 3.2% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 7.1% - 7.1% 0.0% 8.5% 2.2% - - 9.1% 3.9% 43.8% 5.6% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 1.5% - 1.5% 0.0% 2.1% 0.0% - - 1.7% 1.3% 9.4% 1.6% - By Acct Status Acct System 87.3% 51.0% - 51.0% 77.8% 48.6% 54.3% - - 52.9% 48.1% 12.5% 52.0% - Non-Acct System 11.2% 47.5% - 47.5% 22.2% 50.7% 41.3% - - 46.3% 49.4% 84.4% 46.4% - Mobile 4.7% 38.4% - 38.4% 11.1% 40.1% 39.1% - - 34.7% 44.2% 28.1% 37.6% - Non-Acct Test 6.4% 9.1% - 9.1% 11.1% 10.6% 2.2% - - 11.6% 5.2% 56.3% 8.8% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Not Tested 1.5% 1.5% - 1.5% 0.0% 0.7% 4.3% - - 0.8% 2.6% 3.1% 1.6% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 1.5% - 1.5% 0.0% 0.7% 4.3% - - 0.8% 2.6% 3.1% 1.6% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Count 3,132,150 198 - 198 9 142 46 0 0 121 77 32 125 0


Page e281

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 5 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 266 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 178804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers Percent of Failers Passing TAKS (Sum of Grades 4-11) Reading/ELA 2010 57% 80% - 80% * 82% * * * 67% > 99% * > 99% * 2009 43% 75% - 75% * 75% * * * 79% * * 70% * Mathematics 2010 43% 40% - 40% * 32% 75% * * 43% 38% * 29% * 2009 36% 27% - 27% * 18% 56% * * 25% 31% * 19% * Attendance Rate 2008-09 95.6% 88.0% - 88.0% 85.9% 89.0% 85.5% - * 88.8% 86.8% 88.8% 88.1% - 2007-08 95.5% 88.0% - 88.0% * 88.3% 87.2% * * 89.2% 86.6% 88.7% 88.0% - Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 7-12) (AEA Indicator) 2008-09 2.0% 16.9% - 16.9% 23.1% 15.4% 20.5% - * 16.3% 17.9% 4.9% 20.1% - 2007-08 2.2% 18.5% - 18.5% 62.5% 17.3% 19.3% * * 16.2% 21.1% 23.3% 19.6% - 4-Year Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2009 Graduated 80.6% 39.4% - 39.4% 16.7% 43.2% 35.0% - * 40.5% 38.1% 28.6% 43.4% - Received GED 1.4% 6.3% - 6.3% 0.0% 5.3% 10.0% - * 3.8% 9.5% 0.0% 5.7% - Continued HS 8.6% 23.2% - 23.2% 33.3% 21.1% 25.0% - * 22.8% 23.8% 28.6% 22.6% - Dropped Out 9.4% 31.0% - 31.0% 50.0% 30.5% 30.0% - * 32.9% 28.6% 42.9% 28.3% - Class of 2008 Graduated 79.1% 23.1% - 23.1% * 15.2% 34.2% - * 18.0% 27.6% 18.2% 20.0% - Received GED 1.5% 5.6% - 5.6% * 6.1% 5.3% - * 2.0% 8.6% 0.0% 1.8% - Continued HS 8.9% 34.3% - 34.3% * 37.9% 31.6% - * 46.0% 24.1% 36.4% 36.4% - Dropped Out 10.5% 37.0% - 37.0% * 40.9% 28.9% - * 34.0% 39.7% 45.5% 41.8% -


Page e282

U282M110023 0023

5-Year Extended Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2008 Graduated 83.4% 34.0% - 34.0% * 27.0% 43.6% - * 34.7% 33.3% 44.4% 27.8% - Received GED 2.1% 12.3% - 12.3% * 12.7% 12.8% - * 8.2% 15.8% 0.0% 5.6% - Continued HS 2.4% 5.7% - 5.7% * 4.8% 7.7% - * 6.1% 5.3% 0.0% 5.6% - Dropped Out 12.2% 48.1% - 48.1% * 55.6% 35.9% - * 51.0% 45.6% 55.6% 61.1% - Completion Rate II (Graduates, Continuers, and GED) (AEA Indicator) Class of 2009 90.6% 69.0% - 69.0% 50.0% 69.5% 70.0% - * 67.1% 71.4% 57.1% 71.7% - Class of 2008 89.5% 63.0% - 63.0% * 59.1% 71.1% - * 66.0% 60.3% 54.5% 58.2% - Completion Rate I (Graduates and Continuers) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Class of 2009 89.2% 62.7% - 62.7% 50.0% 64.2% 60.0% - * 63.3% 61.9% 57.1% 66.0% - Class of 2008 88.0% 57.4% - 57.4% * 53.0% 65.8% - * 64.0% 51.7% 54.5% 56.4% - COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

5-Year Extended Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2008 Graduated 83.4% 34.0% - 34.0% * 27.0% 43.6% - * 34.7% 33.3% 44.4% 27.8% - Received GED 2.1% 12.3% - 12.3% * 12.7% 12.8% - * 8.2% 15.8% 0.0% 5.6% - Continued HS 2.4% 5.7% - 5.7% * 4.8% 7.7% - * 6.1% 5.3% 0.0% 5.6% - Dropped Out 12.2% 48.1% - 48.1% * 55.6% 35.9% - * 51.0% 45.6% 55.6% 61.1% - Completion Rate II (Graduates, Continuers, and GED) (AEA Indicator) Class of 2009 90.6% 69.0% - 69.0% 50.0% 69.5% 70.0% - * 67.1% 71.4% 57.1% 71.7% - Class of 2008 89.5% 63.0% - 63.0% * 59.1% 71.1% - * 66.0% 60.3% 54.5% 58.2% - Completion Rate I (Graduates and Continuers) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Class of 2009 89.2% 62.7% - 62.7% 50.0% 64.2% 60.0% - * 63.3% 61.9% 57.1% 66.0% - Class of 2008 88.0% 57.4% - 57.4% * 53.0% 65.8% - * 64.0% 51.7% 54.5% 56.4% - COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 2007-08 23.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -


Page e283

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 6 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 266 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 178804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP RHSP/DAP Graduates Class of 2009 82.5% 53.9% - 53.9% * 56.6% 50.0% - - 45.5% 65.6% 0.0% 65.5% - Class of 2008 81.4% 86.1% - 86.1% * 77.3% 100.0% - * 78.6% 90.9% * 86.7% - AP/IB Results Tested 2009 21.2% 1.0% - 1.0% * 0.0% 3.1% - - 0.0% 2.2% n/a n/a n/a 2008 20.9% 0.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a Examinees >= Criterion 2009 51.2% * - * - - * - - - * n/a n/a n/a 2008 50.1% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Scores >= Criterion 2009 47.4% * - * - - * - - - * n/a n/a n/a 2008 46.0% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Texas Success Initiative (TSI) – Higher Education Readiness Component Eng Lang Arts 2010 60% 20% - 20% * 17% 36% * * 26% 12% * 22% * 2009 63% 41% - 41% * 47% 31% * * 41% 42% * 40% * Mathematics 2010 66% 11% - 11% * 7% 27% * * 17% < 1% * 11% * 2009 62% 11% - 11% * 7% 15% * * 12% 9% * 14% * SAT/ACT Results Tested Class of 2009 61.5% 4.2% - 4.2% * 6.1% 0.0% - - 2.5% 6.5% n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 65.0% 17.1% - 17.1% - 9.1% 33.3% - * 14.3% 19.0% n/a n/a n/a At/Above Criterion Class of 2009 26.9% * - * - * - - - * * n/a n/a n/a


Page e284

U282M110023 0023

Class of 2008 27.2% 16.7% - 16.7% - * * - - * * n/a n/a n/a Average SAT Score Class of 2009 985 * - * - * - - - - * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 987 798 - 798 - * * - - * * n/a n/a n/a Average ACT Score Class of 2009 20.5 * - * - * - - - * * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 20.5 * - * - - * - - - * n/a n/a n/a College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% 38% - 38% * 42% 25% * * 33% 50% * 39% * Class of 2008 59% 50% - 50% * 46% 63% * * 50% 50% * 33% * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% 18% - 18% * 12% 25% * * 27% < 1% * 12% * Class of 2008 58% 35% - 35% * 21% 63% * * 22% 43% * 30% * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% 13% - 13% * 8% 17% * * 19% < 1% * 6% *

Class of 2008 27.2% 16.7% - 16.7% - * * - - * * n/a n/a n/a Average SAT Score Class of 2009 985 * - * - * - - - - * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 987 798 - 798 - * * - - * * n/a n/a n/a Average ACT Score Class of 2009 20.5 * - * - * - - - * * n/a n/a n/a Class of 2008 20.5 * - * - - * - - - * n/a n/a n/a College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% 38% - 38% * 42% 25% * * 33% 50% * 39% * Class of 2008 59% 50% - 50% * 46% 63% * * 50% 50% * 33% * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% 18% - 18% * 12% 25% * * 27% < 1% * 12% * Class of 2008 58% 35% - 35% * 21% 63% * * 22% 43% * 30% * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% 13% - 13% * 8% 17% * * 19% < 1% * 6% * Class of 2008 44% 29% - 29% * 17% 50% * * 22% 33% * 25% *


Page e285

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 266 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 178804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Students: 266 100.0% - 266 4,824,778 Students By Grade: Early Childhood Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Pre-Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 4.4% Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 1 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.9% Grade 2 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.8% Grade 3 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.7% Grade 4 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 5 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.5% Grade 6 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 7 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 8 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.2% Grade 9 58 21.8% - 21.8% 8.1% Grade 10 73 27.4% - 27.4% 6.9% Grade 11 97 36.5% - 36.5% 6.4% Grade 12 38 14.3% - 14.3% 5.9% Ethnic Distribution: African American 7 2.6% - 2.6% 14.0% Hispanic 192 72.2% - 72.2% 48.6% White 65 24.4% - 24.4% 33.3% Native American 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.4% Asian/Pac. Islander 2 0.8% - 0.8% 3.7% Economically Disadvantaged 169 63.5% - 63.5% 59.0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.9% Students w/Disciplinary Placements (2008-09) 60 13.9% - 13.9% 13.4% At-Risk 236 88.7% - 88.7% 47.2%



Page e286

U282M110023 0023



Page e287

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 266 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 178804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Graduates (Class of 2009): Count Percent Group District State Total Graduates 76 100.0% - 76 264,275 By Ethnicity (incl. Special Ed.): African American 1 1.3% - 1 35,982 Hispanic 53 69.7% - 53 104,854 White 22 28.9% - 22 112,016 Native American 0 0.0% - 0 961 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0.0% - 0 10,462 By Graduation Type (incl. Special Ed.): Minimum H.S. Program 35 46.1% - 35 46,313 Recommended H.S. Pgm./DAP 41 53.9% - 41 217,962 Special Education Graduates 5 6.6% - 5 25,929 CLASS SIZE INFORMATION (Derived from teacher responsibility records.) Campus Class Size Averages by Grade and Subject: Campus Group District State Elementary: Kindergarten - - - 19.3 Grade 1 - - - 19.1 Grade 2 - - - 19.2 Grade 3 - - - 19.3 Grade 4 - - - 19.9 Grade 5 - - - 22.4 Grade 6 - - - 21.1 Mixed Grades - - - 24.7 Secondary: English/Language Arts 6.3 - 6.3 17.8


Page e288

U282M110023 0023




Page e289

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 266 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 178804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STAFF INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Staff: 17.0 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% Professional Staff: 17.0 100.0% - 85.0% 63.2% Teachers 16.4 96.4% - 81.9% 50.5% Professional Support 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 8.9% Campus Admin. (School Leader.) 0.6 3.6% - 3.1% 2.8% Educational Aides: 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 9.8% Total Minority Staff: 6.0 35.3% - 30.0% 43.9% Teachers By Ethnicity and Sex: African American 1.0 6.1% - 6.1% 9.5% Hispanic 5.0 30.5% - 30.5% 22.5% White 10.4 63.4% - 63.4% 66.4% Native American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 1.3% Males 6.0 36.6% - 36.6% 23.0% Females 10.4 63.4% - 63.4% 77.0% Teachers by Years of Experience: Beginning Teachers 2.0 12.2% - 12.2% 6.0% 1-5 Years Experience 7.0 42.7% - 42.7% 31.0% 6-10 Years Experience 3.5 21.4% - 21.4% 20.3% 11-20 Years Experience 1.5 9.2% - 9.2% 24.4% 0ver 20 Years Experience 2.4 14.6% - 14.6% 18.3% Campus Campus Group District State Average Years Experience of Teachers: 9.6 yrs. - yrs. 9.6 yrs. 11.3 yrs.


Page e290

U282M110023 0023

Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 2.0 yrs. - yrs. 2.0 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers $37,084 - $37,084 $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $41,802 - $41,802 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $46,162 - $46,162 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience $29,615 - $29,615 $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience $49,555 - $49,555 $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $42,171 - $42,171 $48,263 Professional Support - - - $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $75,000 - $75,000 $70,209

Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 2.0 yrs. - yrs. 2.0 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers $37,084 - $37,084 $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $41,802 - $41,802 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $46,162 - $46,162 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience $29,615 - $29,615 $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience $49,555 - $49,555 $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $42,171 - $42,171 $48,263 Professional Support - - - $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $75,000 - $75,000 $70,209 Contracted Instructional Staff (not incl. above): 0.0 - 0.0 1,722.9


Page e291

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 266 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 178804001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE INFORMATION |---------------------------Campus---------------------------| |---------Campus Group---------| (2008-09) General Percent Per All Percent Per All Percent Per Fund Student Funds Student Funds Student By Function: Total Operating Expenditures $1,215,303 100.0% $4,804 $1,606,346 100.0% $6,349 - - - Instruction (11,95) $554,230 45.6% $2,191 $827,293 51.5% $3,270 - - - Instructional-Related Services (12,13) $35,438 2.9% $140 $140,385 8.7% $555 - - - Instructional Leadership (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - School Leadership (23) $170,469 14.0% $674 $178,260 11.1% $705 - - - Support Services-Student (31,32,33) $109,442 9.0% $433 $114,684 7.1% $453 - - - Other Campus Costs (35,36,51,52,53) $345,724 28.4% $1,366 $345,724 21.5% $1,366 - - - By Program: Total Operating Expenditures $869,579 100.0% $3,437 $1,260,205 100.0% $4,981 - - - Bilingual/ESL Education (25) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Career & Technical Education (22) $104,924 12.1% $415 $104,924 8.3% $415 - - - Accelerated Education (24,30) $153,984 17.7% $609 $411,075 32.6% $1,625 - - - Gifted & Talented Education (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Regular Education (11) $556,773 64.0% $2,201 $664,676 52.7% $2,627 - - - Special Education (23) $53,898 6.2% $213 $79,530 6.3% $314 - - - Other (26,28,29) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Student Enrollment by Program: Bilingual/ESL Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.1% Career & Technical Education 149 56.0% - 56.0% 21.3% Gifted & Talented Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Special Education 20 7.5% - 7.5% 9.0%


Page e292

U282M110023 0023




Page e293

U282M110023 0023

2009-10 Academic Excellence Indicator System District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH SCHOOL Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S (KILLEEN Campus #: 014801001 2010 Accountability Rating: AEA: Academically Acceptable Gold Performance Acknowledgments: College-Ready Graduates (Class of 2009) This is a Charter School.


Page e294

U282M110023 0023



Page e295

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 158 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 014801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 9 Reading 2010 92% 90% - 90% > 99% > 99% 86% * * > 99% 75% * 93% * 2009 88% 67% - 67% 50% 78% * * * > 99% 53% * 53% * Mathematics 2010 72% 11% - 11% < 1% < 1% 33% * * 18% < 1% * 14% * 2009 69% 5% - 5% < 1% < 1% * * * 17% < 1% * < 1% * All Tests 2010 71% 15% - 15% 14% < 1% 29% * * 25% < 1% * 14% * 2009 67% 5% - 5% < 1% < 1% * * * 17% < 1% * < 1% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 10 Eng Lang Arts 2010 91% 57% - 57% 38% 80% * * * 50% 60% * 59% * 2009 88% 50% - 50% 65% 25% 38% * * 36% 63% 14% 54% * Mathematics 2010 75% 27% - 27% 17% 20% * * * 38% 21% * 29% * 2009 67% 19% - 19% 27% < 1% 13% * * 19% 18% < 1% 20% * Science 2010 75% 23% - 23% < 1% 20% * * * 25% 21% * 24% * 2009 67% 23% - 23% 27% 10% 25% * * 29% 17% < 1% 23% * Soc Studies 2010 93% 59% - 59% 58% 60% * * * 50% 64% * 59% * 2009 91% 52% - 52% 64% 40% 50% * * 52% 52% 50% 58% * All Tests 2010 66% 9% - 9% < 1% < 1% * * * < 1% 13% * 12% * 2009 56% 11% - 11% 17% < 1% < 1% * * 9% 12% < 1% 14% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard ^ Grade 11 Eng Lang Arts 2010 93% 74% - 74% 86% 63% 63% * * 75% 74% 60% 72% *


Page e296

U282M110023 0023

2009 93% 74% - 74% 67% 57% > 99% * * 67% 80% 40% 64% * Mathematics 2010 89% 44% - 44% 38% 29% 67% * * 56% 39% * 41% * 2009 82% 33% - 33% 29% 17% * * * 22% 44% < 1% 25% * Science 2010 92% 65% - 65% 62% 33% > 99% * * 67% 65% * 63% * 2009 86% 39% - 39% 29% 17% * * * 22% 56% < 1% 33% * Soc Studies 2010 98% 88% - 88% 85% 83% > 99% * * 78% 94% * 94% * 2009 97% 71% - 71% 71% 40% * * * 63% 78% * 64% * All Tests 2010 83% 41% - 41% 29% 44% 50% * * 50% 35% < 1% 39% *

2009 93% 74% - 74% 67% 57% > 99% * * 67% 80% 40% 64% * Mathematics 2010 89% 44% - 44% 38% 29% 67% * * 56% 39% * 41% * 2009 82% 33% - 33% 29% 17% * * * 22% 44% < 1% 25% * Science 2010 92% 65% - 65% 62% 33% > 99% * * 67% 65% * 63% * 2009 86% 39% - 39% 29% 17% * * * 22% 56% < 1% 33% * Soc Studies 2010 98% 88% - 88% 85% 83% > 99% * * 78% 94% * 94% * 2009 97% 71% - 71% 71% 40% * * * 63% 78% * 64% * All Tests 2010 83% 41% - 41% 29% 44% 50% * * 50% 35% < 1% 39% * 2009 76% 40% - 40% 29% 29% 60% * * 22% 55% < 1% 36% *


Page e297

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 158 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 014801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 73% - 73% 71% 78% 74% * * 78% 69% 50% 73% * 2009 88% 59% - 59% 62% 50% 65% * * 54% 63% 20% 56% * Mathematics 2010 84% 30% - 30% 23% 18% 50% * * 36% 26% < 1% 29% * 2009 80% 18% - 18% 22% 4% 25% * * 19% 17% < 1% 15% * Science 2010 83% 46% - 46% 32% 27% 90% * * 47% 45% 17% 42% * 2009 78% 27% - 27% 28% 13% 42% * * 27% 28% < 1% 26% * Soc Studies 2010 95% 75% - 75% 72% 73% 80% * * 65% 81% 50% 76% * 2009 93% 57% - 57% 66% 40% 67% * * 55% 59% 30% 59% * All Tests 2010 77% 24% - 24% 15% 21% 37% * * 28% 21% < 1% 22% * 2009 72% 16% - 16% 16% 7% 24% * * 14% 18% < 1% 16% * TAKS Met 2010 Standard with TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 96% 81% - 81% 82% 78% 79% * * 88% 76% 50% 84% * 2009 95% 77% - 77% 78% 68% 82% * * 76% 78% 47% 74% * Mathematics 2010 91% 40% - 40% 35% 29% 56% * * 46% 36% 13% 42% * 2009 88% 30% - 30% 30% 21% 44% * * 28% 33% 8% 27% * Science 2010 92% 52% - 52% 36% 45% 90% * * 53% 52% 17% 48% * 2009 83% 39% - 39% 48% 13% 50% * * 37% 41% 9% 37% * Soc Studies 2010 99% 88% - 88% 80% 91% > 99% * * 76% 94% 83% 94% * 2009 98% 80% - 80% 86% 67% 83% * * 83% 78% 50% 81% * All Tests 2010 88% 35% - 35% 24% 37% 47% * * 44% 28% 10% 35% * 2009 82% 30% - 30% 29% 18% 47% * * 24% 33% 7% 28% *


Page e298

U282M110023 0023

TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% 4% - 4% 6% < 1% < 1% * * 3% 5% < 1% 6% * 2009 31% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * Mathematics 2010 29% 1% - 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% 3% < 1% 2% * 2009 28% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * Science 2010 28% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * 2009 26% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * Soc Studies 2010 47% 4% - 4% < 1% < 1% 10% * * 6% 3% < 1% 6% * 2009 44% 7% - 7% 10% < 1% 8% * * 14% < 1% < 1% 3% * All Tests 2010 15% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% *

TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% 4% - 4% 6% < 1% < 1% * * 3% 5% < 1% 6% * 2009 31% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * Mathematics 2010 29% 1% - 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% 3% < 1% 2% * 2009 28% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * Science 2010 28% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * 2009 26% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * Soc Studies 2010 47% 4% - 4% < 1% < 1% 10% * * 6% 3% < 1% 6% * 2009 44% 7% - 7% 10% < 1% 8% * * 14% < 1% < 1% 3% * All Tests 2010 15% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * 2009 15% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% *


Page e299

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 158 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 014801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Progress (Sum of All Grades Tested) (AEA Indicator) 2010 85% 77% - 77% 75% 72% 86% * * 77% 77% 65% 76% * 2009 81% 67% - 67% 70% 59% 70% * 53% 70% 64% 43% 65% * TAKS-M Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 85% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 75% 80% - 80% * * * * * * * 80% * * 2009 69% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 58% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 51% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 67% * - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 64% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 64% 40% - 40% * * * * * * * 40% * * 2009 57% * - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 74% - 74% 71% 80% 74% * * 79% 70% 62% 75% * 2009 88% 61% - 61% 62% 53% 67% * * 58% 63% 33% 58% * Mathematics 2010 84% 33% - 33% 27% 25% 50% * * 37% 31% 31% 31% * 2009 80% 20% - 20% 22% 7% 29% * * 21% 19% 12% 16% * Science 2010 82% 45% - 45% 30% 33% 90% * * 44% 45% 22% 44% * 2009 77% 29% - 29% 28% 13% 46% * * 29% 28% 8% 26% *


Page e300

U282M110023 0023

Soc Studies 2010 94% 76% - 76% 74% 75% 80% * * 67% 82% 67% 76% * 2009 92% 57% - 57% 66% 40% 67% * * 55% 59% 30% 59% * All Tests 2010 76% 25% - 25% 14% 27% 37% * * 26% 24% 14% 25% * 2009 71% 16% - 16% 16% 7% 28% * * 15% 18% 6% 15% * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% 5% - 5% 9% < 1% < 1% * * 6% 5% 8% 6% *

Soc Studies 2010 94% 76% - 76% 74% 75% 80% * * 67% 82% 67% 76% * 2009 92% 57% - 57% 66% 40% 67% * * 55% 59% 30% 59% * All Tests 2010 76% 25% - 25% 14% 27% 37% * * 26% 24% 14% 25% * 2009 71% 16% - 16% 16% 7% 28% * * 15% 18% 6% 15% * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% 5% - 5% 9% < 1% < 1% * * 6% 5% 8% 6% * Mathematics 2010 28% 1% - 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * * < 1% 2% < 1% 2% *


Page e301

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 158 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 014801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP 2010 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.6% 99.4% - 99.4% 98.8% 100.0% 100.0% * * 98.7% 100.0% 100.0% 99.1% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 89.2% - 89.2% 91.4% 86.5% 88.2% * * 89.3% 90.2% 30.4% 89.9% - Not on TAKS 7.8% 10.1% - 10.1% 7.4% 13.5% 11.8% * * 9.3% 9.8% 69.6% 9.2% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 3.8% - 3.8% 2.5% 2.7% 8.8% * * 2.7% 4.9% 26.1% 4.6% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 4.4% - 4.4% 2.5% 8.1% 2.9% * * 4.0% 3.7% 30.4% 3.7% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 1.9% - 1.9% 2.5% 2.7% 0.0% * * 2.7% 1.2% 13.0% 0.9% - By Acct Status Acct System 90.0% 46.8% - 46.8% 42.0% 48.6% 55.9% * * 42.7% 51.2% 43.5% 45.0% - Non-Acct System 8.6% 52.5% - 52.5% 56.8% 51.4% 44.1% * * 56.0% 48.8% 56.5% 54.1% - Mobile 4.4% 48.1% - 48.1% 54.3% 43.2% 41.2% * * 52.0% 45.1% 26.1% 50.5% - Non-Acct Test 4.2% 4.4% - 4.4% 2.5% 8.1% 2.9% * * 4.0% 3.7% 30.4% 3.7% - Not Tested 1.4% 0.6% - 0.6% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% * * 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 0.6% - 0.6% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% * * 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% - Total Count 3,175,337 158 - 158 81 37 34 1 4 75 82 23 109 0 2009 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.5% 98.7% - 98.7% 98.6% 100.0% 100.0% * 88.9% 98.7% 98.8% 100.0% 98.0% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 84.1% - 84.1% 88.7% 70.7% 88.6% * 88.9% 77.9% 90.0% 17.9% 80.8% - Not on TAKS 7.7% 14.6% - 14.6% 9.9% 29.3% 11.4% * 0.0% 20.8% 8.8% 82.1% 17.2% -


Page e302

U282M110023 0023

TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 12.1% - 12.1% 9.9% 22.0% 8.6% * 0.0% 16.9% 7.5% 67.9% 14.1% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 1.9% - 1.9% 0.0% 4.9% 2.9% * 0.0% 3.9% 0.0% 10.7% 2.0% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 0.6% - 0.6% 0.0% 2.4% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 3.6% 1.0% - By Acct Status Acct System 87.3% 54.1% - 54.1% 52.1% 63.4% 48.6% * 44.4% 46.8% 61.3% 42.9% 55.6% - Non-Acct System 11.2% 44.6% - 44.6% 46.5% 36.6% 51.4% * 44.4% 51.9% 37.5% 57.1% 42.4% - Mobile 4.7% 39.5% - 39.5% 43.7% 26.8% 45.7% * 44.4% 45.5% 33.8% 28.6% 36.4% - Non-Acct Test 6.4% 5.1% - 5.1% 2.8% 9.8% 5.7% * 0.0% 6.5% 3.8% 28.6% 6.1% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Not Tested 1.5% 1.3% - 1.3% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% * 11.1% 1.3% 1.3% 0.0% 2.0% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 1.3% - 1.3% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% * 11.1% 1.3% 1.3% 0.0% 2.0% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 12.1% - 12.1% 9.9% 22.0% 8.6% * 0.0% 16.9% 7.5% 67.9% 14.1% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 1.9% - 1.9% 0.0% 4.9% 2.9% * 0.0% 3.9% 0.0% 10.7% 2.0% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 0.6% - 0.6% 0.0% 2.4% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 3.6% 1.0% - By Acct Status Acct System 87.3% 54.1% - 54.1% 52.1% 63.4% 48.6% * 44.4% 46.8% 61.3% 42.9% 55.6% - Non-Acct System 11.2% 44.6% - 44.6% 46.5% 36.6% 51.4% * 44.4% 51.9% 37.5% 57.1% 42.4% - Mobile 4.7% 39.5% - 39.5% 43.7% 26.8% 45.7% * 44.4% 45.5% 33.8% 28.6% 36.4% - Non-Acct Test 6.4% 5.1% - 5.1% 2.8% 9.8% 5.7% * 0.0% 6.5% 3.8% 28.6% 6.1% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Not Tested 1.5% 1.3% - 1.3% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% * 11.1% 1.3% 1.3% 0.0% 2.0% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 1.3% - 1.3% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% * 11.1% 1.3% 1.3% 0.0% 2.0% - Hurricane Ike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Count 3,132,150 157 - 157 71 41 35 1 9 77 80 28 99 0


Page e303

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 5 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 158 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 014801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers Percent of Failers Passing TAKS (Sum of Grades 4-11) Reading/ELA 2010 57% 44% - 44% 40% * * * * * 29% * * * 2009 43% 33% - 33% * 29% * * * 33% 33% * 44% * Mathematics 2010 43% 25% - 25% 20% 20% * * * 25% 25% < 1% 27% * 2009 36% 10% - 10% 14% < 1% < 1% * * 8% 11% * 5% * Student Success Initiative Grade 8 Reading TAKS Failers Promoted by Grade Placement Committee 2009 88.5% * n/a * - * - - - * - * * * 2008 88.5% - n/a - - - - - - - - - - - Grade 8 Mathematics TAKS Failers Promoted by Grade Placement Committee 2009 91.1% * n/a * - * - - - * - * * * 2008 90.5% - n/a - - - - - - - - - - - Attendance Rate 2008-09 95.6% 89.4% - 89.4% 89.6% 91.1% 86.9% * 89.8% 90.3% 88.6% 91.8% 89.2% * 2007-08 95.5% 90.2% - 90.2% 90.5% 90.3% 89.3% * * 90.6% 89.9% 92.1% 90.1% - Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 7-12) (AEA Indicator) 2008-09 2.0% 8.8% - 8.8% 10.4% 7.9% 8.3% * 0.0% 8.9% 8.7% 4.8% 11.8% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 5 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 158 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 014801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers Percent of Failers Passing TAKS (Sum of Grades 4-11) Reading/ELA 2010 57% 44% - 44% 40% * * * * * 29% * * * 2009 43% 33% - 33% * 29% * * * 33% 33% * 44% * Mathematics 2010 43% 25% - 25% 20% 20% * * * 25% 25% < 1% 27% * 2009 36% 10% - 10% 14% < 1% < 1% * * 8% 11% * 5% * Student Success Initiative Grade 8 Reading TAKS Failers Promoted by Grade Placement Committee 2009 88.5% * n/a * - * - - - * - * * * 2008 88.5% - n/a - - - - - - - - - - - Grade 8 Mathematics TAKS Failers Promoted by Grade Placement Committee 2009 91.1% * n/a * - * - - - * - * * * 2008 90.5% - n/a - - - - - - - - - - - Attendance Rate 2008-09 95.6% 89.4% - 89.4% 89.6% 91.1% 86.9% * 89.8% 90.3% 88.6% 91.8% 89.2% * 2007-08 95.5% 90.2% - 90.2% 90.5% 90.3% 89.3% * * 90.6% 89.9% 92.1% 90.1% - Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 7-12) (AEA Indicator) 2008-09 2.0% 8.8% - 8.8% 10.4% 7.9% 8.3% * 0.0% 8.9% 8.7% 4.8% 11.8% * 2007-08 2.2% 4.4% - 4.4% 4.2% 6.6% 3.3% * 0.0% 3.5% 5.1% 0.0% 4.2% -


Page e304

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 6 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 158 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 014801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP 4-Year Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2009 Graduated 80.6% 56.2% - 56.2% 48.4% 46.2% 70.4% * * 51.6% 59.5% 71.4% 52.4% - Received GED 1.4% 4.1% - 4.1% 3.2% 7.7% 3.7% * * 3.2% 4.8% 0.0% 0.0% - Continued HS 8.6% 19.2% - 19.2% 19.4% 23.1% 18.5% * * 22.6% 16.7% 14.3% 23.8% - Dropped Out 9.4% 20.5% - 20.5% 29.0% 23.1% 7.4% * * 22.6% 19.0% 14.3% 23.8% - Class of 2008 Graduated 79.1% 54.3% - 54.3% 51.6% 52.9% 59.1% - - 42.3% 61.4% 33.3% 58.8% - Received GED 1.5% 4.3% - 4.3% 6.5% 0.0% 4.5% - - 3.8% 4.5% 16.7% 0.0% - Continued HS 8.9% 25.7% - 25.7% 29.0% 29.4% 18.2% - - 34.6% 20.5% 33.3% 23.5% - Dropped Out 10.5% 15.7% - 15.7% 12.9% 17.6% 18.2% - - 19.2% 13.6% 16.7% 17.6% - 5-Year Extended Completion Rate (Gr 9-12) Class of 2008 Graduated 83.4% 75.4% - 75.4% 74.1% 82.4% 70.8% * - 72.0% 77.3% 71.4% 76.5% - Received GED 2.1% 4.3% - 4.3% 7.4% 0.0% 4.2% * - 4.0% 4.5% 14.3% 0.0% - Continued HS 2.4% 4.3% - 4.3% 3.7% 0.0% 8.3% * - 4.0% 4.5% 0.0% 8.8% - Dropped Out 12.2% 15.9% - 15.9% 14.8% 17.6% 16.7% * - 20.0% 13.6% 14.3% 14.7% - Completion Rate II (Graduates, Continuers, and GED) (AEA Indicator) Class of 2009 90.6% 79.5% - 79.5% 71.0% 76.9% 92.6% * * 77.4% 81.0% 85.7% 76.2% - Class of 2008 89.5% 84.3% - 84.3% 87.1% 82.4% 81.8% - - 80.8% 86.4% 83.3% 82.4% - Completion Rate I (Graduates and Continuers) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Class of 2009 89.2% 75.3% - 75.3% 67.7% 69.2% 88.9% * * 74.2% 76.2% 85.7% 76.2% - Class of 2008 88.0% 80.0% - 80.0% 80.6% 82.4% 77.3% - - 76.9% 81.8% 66.7% 82.4% - COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS


Page e305

U282M110023 0023

Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 1.5% - 1.5% 1.7% 1.6% 1.4% * 0.0% 0.8% 2.1% 0.0% 2.9% * 2007-08 23.1% 0.4% - 0.4% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - RHSP/DAP Graduates Class of 2009 82.5% 69.6% - 69.6% 57.1% 78.6% 77.8% * - 57.1% 82.1% * 75.0% - Class of 2008 81.4% 52.5% - 52.5% 52.9% 71.4% 46.7% - * 33.3% 64.0% * 63.2% - AP/IB Results Tested 2009 21.2% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a 2008 20.9% 1.3% - 1.3% 0.0% 5.3% 0.0% * * 0.0% 1.9% n/a n/a n/a Examinees >= Criterion 2009 51.2% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 50.1% * - * - * - - - - * n/a n/a n/a Scores >= Criterion 2009 47.4% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a

Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 1.5% - 1.5% 1.7% 1.6% 1.4% * 0.0% 0.8% 2.1% 0.0% 2.9% * 2007-08 23.1% 0.4% - 0.4% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - RHSP/DAP Graduates Class of 2009 82.5% 69.6% - 69.6% 57.1% 78.6% 77.8% * - 57.1% 82.1% * 75.0% - Class of 2008 81.4% 52.5% - 52.5% 52.9% 71.4% 46.7% - * 33.3% 64.0% * 63.2% - AP/IB Results Tested 2009 21.2% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a 2008 20.9% 1.3% - 1.3% 0.0% 5.3% 0.0% * * 0.0% 1.9% n/a n/a n/a Examinees >= Criterion 2009 51.2% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 50.1% * - * - * - - - - * n/a n/a n/a Scores >= Criterion 2009 47.4% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 46.0% * - * - * - - - - * n/a n/a n/a


Page e306

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 7 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 158 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 014801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP Texas Success Initiative (TSI) – Higher Education Readiness Component Eng Lang Arts 2010 60% 11% - 11% 8% 13% 14% * * 10% 11% < 1% 19% * 2009 63% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% * * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * Mathematics 2010 66% 4% - 4% < 1% < 1% 20% * * 14% < 1% * 7% * 2009 62% 6% - 6% < 1% 17% * * * < 1% 13% < 1% < 1% * College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% 50% - 50% 43% * 60% * * 44% 55% * < 1% * Class of 2008 59% 33% - 33% 25% * 50% * * 44% 27% * 25% * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% 59% - 59% 40% * 80% * * 57% 60% * 40% * Class of 2008 58% 38% - 38% 50% 20% 33% * * 67% 24% * 31% * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% 38% - 38% < 1% * 67% * * 43% 33% * * *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 7 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 158 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 014801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP Texas Success Initiative (TSI) – Higher Education Readiness Component Eng Lang Arts 2010 60% 11% - 11% 8% 13% 14% * * 10% 11% < 1% 19% * 2009 63% < 1% - < 1% < 1% < 1% * * * < 1% < 1% < 1% < 1% * Mathematics 2010 66% 4% - 4% < 1% < 1% 20% * * 14% < 1% * 7% * 2009 62% 6% - 6% < 1% 17% * * * < 1% 13% < 1% < 1% * College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% 50% - 50% 43% * 60% * * 44% 55% * < 1% * Class of 2008 59% 33% - 33% 25% * 50% * * 44% 27% * 25% * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% 59% - 59% 40% * 80% * * 57% 60% * 40% * Class of 2008 58% 38% - 38% 50% 20% 33% * * 67% 24% * 31% * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% 38% - 38% < 1% * 67% * * 43% 33% * * * Class of 2008 44% 21% - 21% 17% * 25% * * 44% 7% * 8% *


Page e307

U282M110023 0023




Page e308

U282M110023 0023



Page e309

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 158 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 014801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Graduates (Class of 2009): Count Percent Group District State Total Graduates 56 100.0% - 56 264,275 By Ethnicity (incl. Special Ed.): African American 21 37.5% - 21 35,982 Hispanic 14 25.0% - 14 104,854 White 18 32.1% - 18 112,016 Native American 3 5.4% - 3 961 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0.0% - 0 10,462 By Graduation Type (incl. Special Ed.): Minimum H.S. Program 17 30.4% - 17 46,313 Recommended H.S. Pgm./DAP 39 69.6% - 39 217,962 Special Education Graduates 4 7.1% - 4 25,929 CLASS SIZE INFORMATION (Derived from teacher responsibility records.) Campus Class Size Averages by Grade and Subject: Campus Group District State Elementary: Kindergarten - - - 19.3 Grade 1 - - - 19.1 Grade 2 - - - 19.2 Grade 3 - - - 19.3 Grade 4 - - - 19.9 Grade 5 - - - 22.4 Grade 6 - - - 21.1 Mixed Grades - - - 24.7 Secondary: English/Language Arts 5.0 - 5.0 17.8


Page e310

U282M110023 0023




Page e311

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 158 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 014801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STAFF INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Staff: 16.9 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% Professional Staff: 12.5 73.9% - 64.4% 63.2% Teachers 10.5 62.1% - 54.1% 50.5% Professional Support 1.0 5.9% - 5.2% 8.9% Campus Admin. (School Leader.) 1.0 5.9% - 5.2% 2.8% Educational Aides: 4.4 26.1% - 22.7% 9.8% Total Minority Staff: 11.9 70.6% - 74.4% 43.9% Teachers By Ethnicity and Sex: African American 7.0 66.7% - 66.7% 9.5% Hispanic 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 22.5% White 3.5 33.3% - 33.3% 66.4% Native American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 1.3% Males 4.0 38.1% - 38.1% 23.0% Females 6.5 61.9% - 61.9% 77.0% Teachers by Years of Experience: Beginning Teachers 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 6.0% 1-5 Years Experience 3.0 28.6% - 28.6% 31.0% 6-10 Years Experience 3.0 28.6% - 28.6% 20.3% 11-20 Years Experience 3.0 28.6% - 28.6% 24.4% 0ver 20 Years Experience 1.5 14.3% - 14.3% 18.3% Campus Campus Group District State Average Years Experience of Teachers: 10.2 yrs. - yrs. 10.2 yrs. 11.3 yrs.


Page e312

U282M110023 0023

Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 3.0 yrs. - yrs. 3.0 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers - - - $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $40,535 - $40,535 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $41,782 - $41,782 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience $44,892 - $44,892 $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience $43,142 - $43,142 $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $42,509 - $42,509 $48,263 Professional Support $49,432 - $49,432 $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $75,000 - $75,000 $70,209

Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 3.0 yrs. - yrs. 3.0 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers - - - $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $40,535 - $40,535 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $41,782 - $41,782 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience $44,892 - $44,892 $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience $43,142 - $43,142 $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $42,509 - $42,509 $48,263 Professional Support $49,432 - $49,432 $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $75,000 - $75,000 $70,209 Contracted Instructional Staff (not incl. above): 0.0 - 0.0 1,722.9


Page e313

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER HIGH Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 158 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTER H S 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 014801001 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE INFORMATION |---------------------------Campus---------------------------| |---------Campus Group---------| (2008-09) General Percent Per All Percent Per All Percent Per Fund Student Funds Student Funds Student By Function: Total Operating Expenditures $846,094 100.0% $4,835 $1,250,915 100.0% $7,148 - - - Instruction (11,95) $454,496 53.7% $2,597 $826,312 66.1% $4,722 - - - Instructional-Related Services (12,13) $11,971 1.4% $68 $32,804 2.6% $187 - - - Instructional Leadership (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - School Leadership (23) $157,129 18.6% $898 $166,561 13.3% $952 - - - Support Services-Student (31,32,33) $66,715 7.9% $381 $67,979 5.4% $388 - - - Other Campus Costs (35,36,51,52,53) $155,783 18.4% $890 $157,259 12.6% $899 - - - By Program: Total Operating Expenditures $690,311 100.0% $3,945 $1,093,656 100.0% $6,249 - - - Bilingual/ESL Education (25) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Career & Technical Education (22) $55,455 8.0% $317 $55,455 5.1% $317 - - - Accelerated Education (24,30) $85,593 12.4% $489 $430,711 39.4% $2,461 - - - Gifted & Talented Education (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Regular Education (11) $491,607 71.2% $2,809 $511,104 46.7% $2,921 - - - Special Education (23) $57,656 8.4% $329 $96,386 8.8% $551 - - - Other (26,28,29) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Student Enrollment by Program: Bilingual/ESL Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.1% Career & Technical Education 78 49.4% - 49.4% 21.3% Gifted & Talented Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Special Education 25 15.8% - 15.8% 9.0%


Page e314

U282M110023 0023




Page e315

U282M110023 0023

2009-10 Academic Excellence Indicator System District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (ECTOR COU Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIVE HS (LU Campus #: 068801003 2010 Accountability Rating: AEA: Academically Acceptable This is a Charter School. Note: District at-risk completion data were used for 2010 accountability evaluation purposes.


Page e316

U282M110023 0023



Page e317

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 9 Reading 2010 92% 78% - 86% * 83% * * * * * * 86% * 2009 88% 69% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 72% 30% - 17% * 17% * * * * * * 17% * 2009 69% 38% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 71% 35% - 38% * 29% * * * * 40% * 38% * 2009 67% 38% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 10 Eng Lang Arts 2010 91% 73% - 58% * 43% 70% * * 38% 73% * 57% * 2009 88% 65% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 75% 45% - 63% * 80% 50% * * 38% 88% * 64% * 2009 67% 18% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 75% 43% - 56% * 33% 70% * * 63% 50% * 54% * 2009 67% 6% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 93% 77% - 89% * > 99% 80% * * 88% 90% * 92% * 2009 91% 71% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 66% 30% - 32% * 14% 50% * * 13% 45% * 21% * 2009 56% 6% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard ^ Grade 11 Eng Lang Arts 2010 93% 79% - 84% * 90% 89% * * 78% 92% * 88% * 2009 93% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 89% 49% - 57% * 50% 80% * * 64% 50% * 56% * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 92% 68% - 77% * 74% > 99% * * 80% 73% * 75% * 2009 86% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 98% 88% - 88% * 89% > 99% * * 93% 82% * 90% * 2009 97% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 83% 46% - 52% * 45% 78% * * 50% 54% * 52% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 9 Reading 2010 92% 78% - 86% * 83% * * * * * * 86% * 2009 88% 69% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 72% 30% - 17% * 17% * * * * * * 17% * 2009 69% 38% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 71% 35% - 38% * 29% * * * * 40% * 38% * 2009 67% 38% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard Grade 10 Eng Lang Arts 2010 91% 73% - 58% * 43% 70% * * 38% 73% * 57% * 2009 88% 65% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 75% 45% - 63% * 80% 50% * * 38% 88% * 64% * 2009 67% 18% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 75% 43% - 56% * 33% 70% * * 63% 50% * 54% * 2009 67% 6% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 93% 77% - 89% * > 99% 80% * * 88% 90% * 92% * 2009 91% 71% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 66% 30% - 32% * 14% 50% * * 13% 45% * 21% * 2009 56% 6% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard ^ Grade 11 Eng Lang Arts 2010 93% 79% - 84% * 90% 89% * * 78% 92% * 88% * 2009 93% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 89% 49% - 57% * 50% 80% * * 64% 50% * 56% * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 92% 68% - 77% * 74% > 99% * * 80% 73% * 75% * 2009 86% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 98% 88% - 88% * 89% > 99% * * 93% 82% * 90% * 2009 97% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 83% 46% - 52% * 45% 78% * * 50% 54% * 52% * 2009 76% * - * * * * * * * * * * *


Page e318

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 78% - 75% * 79% 80% * * 69% 82% 33% 78% * 2009 88% 67% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 84% 44% - 53% * 48% 60% * * 50% 57% * 52% * 2009 80% 27% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 83% 61% - 68% * 64% 80% * * 74% 62% * 67% * 2009 78% 6% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 95% 85% - 89% * 92% 87% * * 91% 86% * 91% * 2009 93% 71% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 77% 41% - 43% * 35% 65% * * 38% 48% 17% 40% * 2009 72% 20% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard with TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 96% 83% - 88% * 88% 95% * * 86% 89% 33% 89% * 2009 95% 93% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 91% 52% - 65% * 59% 73% * * 59% 71% * 64% * 2009 88% 40% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 92% 67% - 77% * 72% 93% * * 78% 76% * 76% * 2009 83% 41% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 99% 89% - 93% * 92% > 99% * * 96% 90% * 94% * 2009 98% > 99% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 88% 50% - 57% * 53% 70% * * 48% 66% 17% 57% * 2009 82% 40% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% 4% - 4% * 3% 5% * * 3% 4% < 1% 2% * 2009 31% < 1% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 29% 2% - 2% * 4% < 1% * * < 1% 5% * 3% * 2009 28% 3% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 28% 3% - 7% * 4% 13% * * 9% 5% * 6% * 2009 26% < 1% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 47% 14% - 25% * 12% 40% * * 35% 14% * 24% * 2009 44% 12% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 15% 1% - 2% * 3% < 1% * * < 1% 3% < 1% 2% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) (Standard Accountability Indicator) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 78% - 75% * 79% 80% * * 69% 82% 33% 78% * 2009 88% 67% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 84% 44% - 53% * 48% 60% * * 50% 57% * 52% * 2009 80% 27% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 83% 61% - 68% * 64% 80% * * 74% 62% * 67% * 2009 78% 6% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 95% 85% - 89% * 92% 87% * * 91% 86% * 91% * 2009 93% 71% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 77% 41% - 43% * 35% 65% * * 38% 48% 17% 40% * 2009 72% 20% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard with TPM (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 96% 83% - 88% * 88% 95% * * 86% 89% 33% 89% * 2009 95% 93% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 91% 52% - 65% * 59% 73% * * 59% 71% * 64% * 2009 88% 40% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 92% 67% - 77% * 72% 93% * * 78% 76% * 76% * 2009 83% 41% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 99% 89% - 93% * 92% > 99% * * 96% 90% * 94% * 2009 98% > 99% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 88% 50% - 57% * 53% 70% * * 48% 66% 17% 57% * 2009 82% 40% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 33% 4% - 4% * 3% 5% * * 3% 4% < 1% 2% * 2009 31% < 1% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 29% 2% - 2% * 4% < 1% * * < 1% 5% * 3% * 2009 28% 3% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 28% 3% - 7% * 4% 13% * * 9% 5% * 6% * 2009 26% < 1% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 47% 14% - 25% * 12% 40% * * 35% 14% * 24% * 2009 44% 12% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 15% 1% - 2% * 3% < 1% * * < 1% 3% < 1% 2% * 2009 15% < 1% - * * * * * * * * * * *


Page e319

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Progress (Sum of All Grades Tested) (AEA Indicator) 2010 85% 85% - 91% 85% 90% 94% * * 90% 92% 72% 92% * 2009 81% 89% - > 99% * * * * * * * * * * TAKS-M Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 85% > 99% - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 75% 78% - 80% * * * * * * * 80% 80% * 2009 69% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 64% 80% - 80% * * * * * * * 80% 80% * 2009 57% * - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 78% - 76% * 79% 80% * * 69% 83% 43% 79% * 2009 88% 68% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 84% 45% - 56% * 48% 63% * * 52% 60% 80% 55% * 2009 80% 26% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 82% 61% - 68% * 64% 80% * * 74% 62% * 67% * 2009 77% 11% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 94% 85% - 89% * 92% 87% * * 91% 86% * 91% * 2009 92% 72% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 76% 41% - 42% * 34% 65% * * 38% 47% 14% 40% * 2009 71% 19% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% 4% - 5% * 6% 5% * * 3% 7% 14% 4% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP TAKS Progress (Sum of All Grades Tested) (AEA Indicator) 2010 85% 85% - 91% 85% 90% 94% * * 90% 92% 72% 92% * 2009 81% 89% - > 99% * * * * * * * * * * TAKS-M Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested) Reading/ELA 2010 85% > 99% - * * * * * * * * * * * 2009 82% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 75% 78% - 80% * * * * * * * 80% 80% * 2009 69% * - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 64% 80% - 80% * * * * * * * 80% 80% * 2009 57% * - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS Met 2010 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 90% 78% - 76% * 79% 80% * * 69% 83% 43% 79% * 2009 88% 68% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 84% 45% - 56% * 48% 63% * * 52% 60% 80% 55% * 2009 80% 26% - * * * * * * * * * * * Science 2010 82% 61% - 68% * 64% 80% * * 74% 62% * 67% * 2009 77% 11% - * * * * * * * * * * * Soc Studies 2010 94% 85% - 89% * 92% 87% * * 91% 86% * 91% * 2009 92% 72% - * * * * * * * * * * * All Tests 2010 76% 41% - 42% * 34% 65% * * 38% 47% 14% 40% * 2009 71% 19% - * * * * * * * * * * * TAKS 2010 Commended Performance (Sum of All Grades Tested, INCLUDES TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alt) (2011 Preview) Reading/ELA 2010 32% 4% - 5% * 6% 5% * * 3% 7% 14% 4% * Mathematics 2010 28% 2% - 4% * 3% 6% * * < 1% 8% 20% 5% *


Page e320

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP 2010 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.6% 99.7% - 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% - - 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 87.0% - 86.7% 77.8% 89.2% 84.4% - - 86.4% 87.1% 39.3% 87.4% - Not on TAKS 7.8% 12.7% - 13.3% 22.2% 10.8% 15.6% - - 13.6% 12.9% 60.7% 12.6% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 8.8% - 7.0% 0.0% 6.8% 8.9% - - 9.1% 4.8% 32.1% 6.8% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 2.9% - 3.9% 22.2% 2.7% 2.2% - - 3.0% 4.8% 17.9% 2.9% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 1.0% - 2.3% 0.0% 1.4% 4.4% - - 1.5% 3.2% 10.7% 2.9% - By Acct Status Acct System 90.0% 58.4% - 44.5% 44.4% 44.6% 44.4% - - 43.9% 45.2% 21.4% 44.7% - Non-Acct System 8.6% 41.3% - 55.5% 55.6% 55.4% 55.6% - - 56.1% 54.8% 78.6% 55.3% - Mobile 4.4% 38.4% - 51.6% 33.3% 52.7% 53.3% - - 53.0% 50.0% 60.7% 52.4% - Non-Acct Test 4.2% 2.9% - 3.9% 22.2% 2.7% 2.2% - - 3.0% 4.8% 17.9% 2.9% - Not Tested 1.4% 0.3% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 0.3% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Total Count 3,175,337 385 - 128 9 74 45 0 0 66 62 28 103 0 Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers Percent of Failers Passing TAKS (Sum of Grades 4-11) Reading/ELA 2010 57% 49% - 38% * * * * * 20% * * * * 2009 43% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 43% 38% - 50% * 36% 63% * * 54% 43% * 36% * 2009 36% < 1% - * * * * * * * * * * * Attendance Rate 2008-09 95.6% 88.4% - 85.8% 83.2% 85.0% 87.0% * * 86.0% 85.6% 87.6% 84.5% - 2007-08 95.5% 89.4% - - - - - - - - - - - - Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 7-12) (AEA Indicator) 2008-09 2.0% 13.8% - 18.3% 20.7% 25.2% 11.3% * * 16.0% 20.8% 17.0% 15.8% - 2007-08 2.2% 8.5% - - - - - - - - - - - - COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 10.4% - 1.9% 7.7% 0.0% 2.8% - * 0.9% 2.9% 0.0% 3.3% - 2007-08 23.1% 9.3% - - - - - - - - - - - - RHSP/DAP Graduates Class of 2009 82.5% 70.1% - 47.2% * 43.8% 51.4% - - 28.6% 59.4% 0.0% 43.3% -

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP 2010 TAKS Participation (Grades 3-11) Tested 98.6% 99.7% - 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% - - 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% - By Test Version TAKS (1 or more) 90.8% 87.0% - 86.7% 77.8% 89.2% 84.4% - - 86.4% 87.1% 39.3% 87.4% - Not on TAKS 7.8% 12.7% - 13.3% 22.2% 10.8% 15.6% - - 13.6% 12.9% 60.7% 12.6% - TAKS(Acc) Only 2.3% 8.8% - 7.0% 0.0% 6.8% 8.9% - - 9.1% 4.8% 32.1% 6.8% - TAKS-M Only 3.3% 2.9% - 3.9% 22.2% 2.7% 2.2% - - 3.0% 4.8% 17.9% 2.9% - TAKS-Alt Only 0.8% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Combination 1.3% 1.0% - 2.3% 0.0% 1.4% 4.4% - - 1.5% 3.2% 10.7% 2.9% - By Acct Status Acct System 90.0% 58.4% - 44.5% 44.4% 44.6% 44.4% - - 43.9% 45.2% 21.4% 44.7% - Non-Acct System 8.6% 41.3% - 55.5% 55.6% 55.4% 55.6% - - 56.1% 54.8% 78.6% 55.3% - Mobile 4.4% 38.4% - 51.6% 33.3% 52.7% 53.3% - - 53.0% 50.0% 60.7% 52.4% - Non-Acct Test 4.2% 2.9% - 3.9% 22.2% 2.7% 2.2% - - 3.0% 4.8% 17.9% 2.9% - Not Tested 1.4% 0.3% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Absent 0.1% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - LEP Exempt 0.9% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other 0.4% 0.3% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Total Count 3,175,337 385 - 128 9 74 45 0 0 66 62 28 103 0 Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers Percent of Failers Passing TAKS (Sum of Grades 4-11) Reading/ELA 2010 57% 49% - 38% * * * * * 20% * * * * 2009 43% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 43% 38% - 50% * 36% 63% * * 54% 43% * 36% * 2009 36% < 1% - * * * * * * * * * * * Attendance Rate 2008-09 95.6% 88.4% - 85.8% 83.2% 85.0% 87.0% * * 86.0% 85.6% 87.6% 84.5% - 2007-08 95.5% 89.4% - - - - - - - - - - - - Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 7-12) (AEA Indicator) 2008-09 2.0% 13.8% - 18.3% 20.7% 25.2% 11.3% * * 16.0% 20.8% 17.0% 15.8% - 2007-08 2.2% 8.5% - - - - - - - - - - - - COLLEGE READINESS INDICATORS Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion 2008-09 24.6% 10.4% - 1.9% 7.7% 0.0% 2.8% - * 0.9% 2.9% 0.0% 3.3% - 2007-08 23.1% 9.3% - - - - - - - - - - - - RHSP/DAP Graduates Class of 2009 82.5% 70.1% - 47.2% * 43.8% 51.4% - - 28.6% 59.4% 0.0% 43.3% - Class of 2008 81.4% 57.1% - - - - - - - - - - - -


Page e321

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 5 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP AP/IB Results Tested 2009 21.2% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a 2008 20.9% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Examinees >= Criterion 2009 51.2% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 50.1% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Scores >= Criterion 2009 47.4% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 46.0% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Texas Success Initiative (TSI) – Higher Education Readiness Component Eng Lang Arts 2010 60% 24% - 26% * 30% 22% * * 22% 31% * 24% * 2009 63% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 66% 16% - 29% * 25% 40% * * 27% 30% * 31% * 2009 62% * - * * * * * * * * * * * College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% 30% - 29% * * 33% * * 27% 29% * 21% * Class of 2008 59% 21% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% 15% - 21% * < 1% 25% * * 27% 17% * 7% * Class of 2008 58% 8% - * * * * * * * * * * * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% 6% - 4% * * 4% * * 9% < 1% * < 1% *

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section I - Page 5 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Performance Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Campus African Native Asian/ Special Econ Indicator: State District Group Campus American Hispanic White American Pacific Is Male Female Ed Disad LEP AP/IB Results Tested 2009 21.2% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% n/a n/a n/a 2008 20.9% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Examinees >= Criterion 2009 51.2% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 50.1% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Scores >= Criterion 2009 47.4% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a 2008 46.0% - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a n/a Texas Success Initiative (TSI) – Higher Education Readiness Component Eng Lang Arts 2010 60% 24% - 26% * 30% 22% * * 22% 31% * 24% * 2009 63% * - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics 2010 66% 16% - 29% * 25% 40% * * 27% 30% * 31% * 2009 62% * - * * * * * * * * * * * College-Ready Graduates Eng Lang Arts Class of 2009 62% 30% - 29% * * 33% * * 27% 29% * 21% * Class of 2008 59% 21% - * * * * * * * * * * * Mathematics Class of 2009 60% 15% - 21% * < 1% 25% * * 27% 17% * 7% * Class of 2008 58% 8% - * * * * * * * * * * * Both Subjects Class of 2009 47% 6% - 4% * * 4% * * 9% < 1% * < 1% * Class of 2008 44% 8% - * * * * * * * * * * *


Page e322

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Students: 146 100.0% - 477 4,824,778 Students By Grade: Early Childhood Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Pre-Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 4.4% Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 1 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.9% Grade 2 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.8% Grade 3 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.7% Grade 4 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 5 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.5% Grade 6 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 7 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 8 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.2% Grade 9 17 11.6% - 13.8% 8.1% Grade 10 25 17.1% - 18.9% 6.9% Grade 11 46 31.5% - 35.2% 6.4% Grade 12 58 39.7% - 32.1% 5.9% Ethnic Distribution: African American 18 12.3% - 7.3% 14.0% Hispanic 67 45.9% - 56.0% 48.6% White 60 41.1% - 36.3% 33.3% Native American 0 0.0% - 0.2% 0.4% Asian/Pac. Islander 1 0.7% - 0.2% 3.7% Economically Disadvantaged 112 76.7% - 73.8% 59.0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.9% Students w/Disciplinary Placements (2008-09) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 13.4% At-Risk 132 90.4% - 89.1% 47.2% Mobility (2008-09) 230 72.3% - 68.8% 18.9%

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 1 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Students: 146 100.0% - 477 4,824,778 Students By Grade: Early Childhood Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Pre-Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 4.4% Kindergarten 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 1 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.9% Grade 2 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.8% Grade 3 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.7% Grade 4 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Grade 5 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.5% Grade 6 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 7 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.3% Grade 8 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.2% Grade 9 17 11.6% - 13.8% 8.1% Grade 10 25 17.1% - 18.9% 6.9% Grade 11 46 31.5% - 35.2% 6.4% Grade 12 58 39.7% - 32.1% 5.9% Ethnic Distribution: African American 18 12.3% - 7.3% 14.0% Hispanic 67 45.9% - 56.0% 48.6% White 60 41.1% - 36.3% 33.3% Native American 0 0.0% - 0.2% 0.4% Asian/Pac. Islander 1 0.7% - 0.2% 3.7% Economically Disadvantaged 112 76.7% - 73.8% 59.0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 16.9% Students w/Disciplinary Placements (2008-09) 0 0.0% - 0.0% 13.4% At-Risk 132 90.4% - 89.1% 47.2% Mobility (2008-09) 230 72.3% - 68.8% 18.9% Number of Students per Teacher 14.6 n/a - 21.8 14.5


Page e323

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Graduates (Class of 2009): Count Percent Group District State Total Graduates 53 100.0% - 154 264,275 By Ethnicity (incl. Special Ed.): African American 2 3.8% - 3 35,982 Hispanic 16 30.2% - 83 104,854 White 35 66.0% - 68 112,016 Native American 0 0.0% - 0 961 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0.0% - 0 10,462 By Graduation Type (incl. Special Ed.): Minimum H.S. Program 28 52.8% - 46 46,313 Recommended H.S. Pgm./DAP 25 47.2% - 108 217,962 Special Education Graduates 7 13.2% - 9 25,929 CLASS SIZE INFORMATION (Derived from teacher responsibility records.) Campus Class Size Averages by Grade and Subject: Campus Group District State Elementary: Kindergarten - - - 19.3 Grade 1 - - - 19.1 Grade 2 - - - 19.2 Grade 3 - - - 19.3 Grade 4 - - - 19.9 Grade 5 - - - 22.4 Grade 6 - - - 21.1 Mixed Grades - - - 24.7 Secondary: English/Language Arts 11.4 - 7.8 17.8 Foreign Languages 8.0 - 4.3 19.4 Mathematics 10.3 - 10.2 18.5 Science 8.0 - 8.9 19.3

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 2 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STUDENT INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Graduates (Class of 2009): Count Percent Group District State Total Graduates 53 100.0% - 154 264,275 By Ethnicity (incl. Special Ed.): African American 2 3.8% - 3 35,982 Hispanic 16 30.2% - 83 104,854 White 35 66.0% - 68 112,016 Native American 0 0.0% - 0 961 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0.0% - 0 10,462 By Graduation Type (incl. Special Ed.): Minimum H.S. Program 28 52.8% - 46 46,313 Recommended H.S. Pgm./DAP 25 47.2% - 108 217,962 Special Education Graduates 7 13.2% - 9 25,929 CLASS SIZE INFORMATION (Derived from teacher responsibility records.) Campus Class Size Averages by Grade and Subject: Campus Group District State Elementary: Kindergarten - - - 19.3 Grade 1 - - - 19.1 Grade 2 - - - 19.2 Grade 3 - - - 19.3 Grade 4 - - - 19.9 Grade 5 - - - 22.4 Grade 6 - - - 21.1 Mixed Grades - - - 24.7 Secondary: English/Language Arts 11.4 - 7.8 17.8 Foreign Languages 8.0 - 4.3 19.4 Mathematics 10.3 - 10.2 18.5 Science 8.0 - 8.9 19.3 Social Studies 9.9 - 7.0 20.4


Page e324

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STAFF INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Staff: 12.9 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% Professional Staff: 12.9 100.0% - 63.0% 63.2% Teachers 10.0 77.3% - 50.0% 50.5% Professional Support 1.9 15.0% - 8.5% 8.9% Campus Admin. (School Leader.) 1.0 7.7% - 4.6% 2.8% Educational Aides: 0.0 0.0% - 15.4% 9.8% Total Minority Staff: 1.0 7.7% - 24.4% 43.9% Teachers By Ethnicity and Sex: African American 0.0 0.0% - 9.1% 9.5% Hispanic 1.0 10.0% - 19.1% 22.5% White 9.0 90.0% - 71.7% 66.4% Native American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 1.3% Males 1.0 10.0% - 12.9% 23.0% Females 9.0 90.0% - 87.1% 77.0% Teachers by Years of Experience: Beginning Teachers 0.0 0.0% - 12.8% 6.0% 1-5 Years Experience 3.0 30.0% - 22.9% 31.0% 6-10 Years Experience 2.0 20.0% - 37.0% 20.3% 11-20 Years Experience 1.0 10.0% - 9.1% 24.4% 0ver 20 Years Experience 4.0 40.0% - 18.3% 18.3% Campus Campus Group District State Average Years Experience of Teachers: 17.5 yrs. - yrs. 11.1 yrs. 11.3 yrs. Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 4.5 yrs. - yrs. 4.4 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers - - $29,913 $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $39,928 - $39,474 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $42,614 - $47,539 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience $41,364 - $45,181 $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience $43,473 - $43,473 $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $42,027 - $42,489 $48,263 Professional Support $41,938 - $47,479 $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $75,000 - $71,567 $70,209

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 3 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STAFF INFORMATION |--------Campus--------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Total Staff: 12.9 100.0% - 100.0% 100.0% Professional Staff: 12.9 100.0% - 63.0% 63.2% Teachers 10.0 77.3% - 50.0% 50.5% Professional Support 1.9 15.0% - 8.5% 8.9% Campus Admin. (School Leader.) 1.0 7.7% - 4.6% 2.8% Educational Aides: 0.0 0.0% - 15.4% 9.8% Total Minority Staff: 1.0 7.7% - 24.4% 43.9% Teachers By Ethnicity and Sex: African American 0.0 0.0% - 9.1% 9.5% Hispanic 1.0 10.0% - 19.1% 22.5% White 9.0 90.0% - 71.7% 66.4% Native American 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 0.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 1.3% Males 1.0 10.0% - 12.9% 23.0% Females 9.0 90.0% - 87.1% 77.0% Teachers by Years of Experience: Beginning Teachers 0.0 0.0% - 12.8% 6.0% 1-5 Years Experience 3.0 30.0% - 22.9% 31.0% 6-10 Years Experience 2.0 20.0% - 37.0% 20.3% 11-20 Years Experience 1.0 10.0% - 9.1% 24.4% 0ver 20 Years Experience 4.0 40.0% - 18.3% 18.3% Campus Campus Group District State Average Years Experience of Teachers: 17.5 yrs. - yrs. 11.1 yrs. 11.3 yrs. Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 4.5 yrs. - yrs. 4.4 yrs. 7.6 yrs. Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience: (regular duties only) Beginning Teachers - - $29,913 $41,165 1-5 Years Experience $39,928 - $39,474 $43,527 6-10 Years Experience $42,614 - $47,539 $46,149 11-20 Years Experience $41,364 - $45,181 $50,153 Over 20 Years Experience $43,473 - $43,473 $58,427 Average Actual Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $42,027 - $42,489 $48,263 Professional Support $41,938 - $47,479 $56,470 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $75,000 - $71,567 $70,209 Contracted Instructional Staff (not incl. above): 0.0 - 0.0 1,722.9


Page e325

U282M110023 0023

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE INFORMATION |---------------------------Campus---------------------------| |---------Campus Group---------| (2008-09) General Percent Per All Percent Per All Percent Per Fund Student Funds Student Funds Student By Function: Total Operating Expenditures $761,594 100.0% $4,255 $992,281 100.0% $5,543 - - - Instruction (11,95) $342,996 45.0% $1,916 $545,110 54.9% $3,045 - - - Instructional-Related Services (12,13) $25,089 3.3% $140 $40,071 4.0% $224 - - - Instructional Leadership (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - School Leadership (23) $146,111 19.2% $816 $146,588 14.8% $819 - - - Support Services-Student (31,32,33) $84,128 11.0% $470 $92,296 9.3% $516 - - - Other Campus Costs (35,36,51,52,53) $163,270 21.4% $912 $168,216 17.0% $940 - - - By Program: Total Operating Expenditures $598,324 100.0% $3,343 $824,065 100.0% $4,604 - - - Bilingual/ESL Education (25) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Career & Technical Education (22) $50,054 8.4% $280 $50,054 6.1% $280 - - - Accelerated Education (24,30) $131,961 22.1% $737 $267,764 32.5% $1,496 - - - Gifted & Talented Education (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Regular Education (11) $347,214 58.0% $1,940 $394,688 47.9% $2,205 - - - Special Education (23) $69,095 11.5% $386 $111,559 13.5% $623 - - - Other (26,28,29) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Student Enrollment by Program: Bilingual/ESL Education 0 0.0% - 1.3% 16.1% Career & Technical Education 78 53.4% - 36.3% 21.3% Gifted & Talented Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Special Education 21 14.4% - 12.6% 9.0% Teachers by Program (population served): Bilingual/ESL Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.0% Career & Technical Education 1.4 13.7% - 8.9% 3.9% Compensatory Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.4% Gifted & Talented Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 2.0% Regular Education 7.6 76.3% - 86.6% 71.0% Special Education 1.0 10.0% - 4.6% 9.6% Other 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.0% '^' Primary Spring Administration, plus October first-time 11th grade testers who pass all 4 tests in October. '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Section II - Page 4 District Name: RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (E Academic Excellence Indicator System Total Students: 146 Campus Name: RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIV 2009-10 Campus Profile Grade Span: 09 - 12 Campus #: 068801003 School Type: Secondary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE INFORMATION |---------------------------Campus---------------------------| |---------Campus Group---------| (2008-09) General Percent Per All Percent Per All Percent Per Fund Student Funds Student Funds Student By Function: Total Operating Expenditures $761,594 100.0% $4,255 $992,281 100.0% $5,543 - - - Instruction (11,95) $342,996 45.0% $1,916 $545,110 54.9% $3,045 - - - Instructional-Related Services (12,13) $25,089 3.3% $140 $40,071 4.0% $224 - - - Instructional Leadership (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - School Leadership (23) $146,111 19.2% $816 $146,588 14.8% $819 - - - Support Services-Student (31,32,33) $84,128 11.0% $470 $92,296 9.3% $516 - - - Other Campus Costs (35,36,51,52,53) $163,270 21.4% $912 $168,216 17.0% $940 - - - By Program: Total Operating Expenditures $598,324 100.0% $3,343 $824,065 100.0% $4,604 - - - Bilingual/ESL Education (25) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Career & Technical Education (22) $50,054 8.4% $280 $50,054 6.1% $280 - - - Accelerated Education (24,30) $131,961 22.1% $737 $267,764 32.5% $1,496 - - - Gifted & Talented Education (21) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - Regular Education (11) $347,214 58.0% $1,940 $394,688 47.9% $2,205 - - - Special Education (23) $69,095 11.5% $386 $111,559 13.5% $623 - - - Other (26,28,29) $0 0.0% $0 $0 0.0% $0 - - - _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM INFORMATION |-------Campus-------| Campus Count Percent Group District State Student Enrollment by Program: Bilingual/ESL Education 0 0.0% - 1.3% 16.1% Career & Technical Education 78 53.4% - 36.3% 21.3% Gifted & Talented Education 0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.6% Special Education 21 14.4% - 12.6% 9.0% Teachers by Program (population served): Bilingual/ESL Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 7.0% Career & Technical Education 1.4 13.7% - 8.9% 3.9% Compensatory Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.4% Gifted & Talented Education 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 2.0% Regular Education 7.6 76.3% - 86.6% 71.0% Special Education 1.0 10.0% - 4.6% 9.6% Other 0.0 0.0% - 0.0% 3.0% '^' Primary Spring Administration, plus October first-time 11th grade testers who pass all 4 tests in October. '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.


Page e326

U282M110023 0023

RMA 27 Congress Street, Shetland Park #310, Salem, MA 01970 Phone (978) 741-7161 Fax (978) 741-0414

Richard Milburn Academy Attachment 6 Financial Information


Page e327

U282M110023 0023


Page e328

U282M110023 0023

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY/TX, INC.

ANNUAL AND FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

AUGUST 31, 2010

(WITH SUMMARIZED COMPARATIVE INFORMATION FOR 2009)


Page e329

U282M110023 0023

CONTENTS Page

Certificate of Board 1 Independent Auditor’s Report 2-3 General-Purpose Financial Statements:

Statements of Financial Position 4 Statements of Activities 5-6 Statements of Cash Flows 7 Notes to Financial Statements 8-15

Specific-Purpose Financial Statements and Schedules:

Statements of Financial Position: Fort Worth 16 Houston 17 Odessa 18

Statements of Activities: Fort Worth 19 Houston 20 Odessa 21

Statements of Cash Flows: Fort Worth 22 Houston 23 Odessa 24

Schedules of Expenses: Fort Worth 25 Houston 26 Odessa 27

Schedules of Capital Assets: Fort Worth 28 Houston 29 Odessa 30

Budgetary Comparison Schedules: Fort Worth 31 Houston 32 Odessa 33

Explanation of Budget Variances Fort Worth 34-35 Houston 36-38 Odessa 39-41

Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 42-43

Note to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 44

Report of Independent Auditors on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards

45-46


Page e330

U282M110023 0023

CONTENTS (continued)

Page Report of Independent Auditors on Compliance with Requirements Applicable to Each Major Program and on Internal Control Over Compliance in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133

47-48

Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs 49-53

Corrective Action Plan 54-57


Page e331

U282M110023 0023


Page e332

U282M110023 0023

2

Independent Auditor’s Report

Board of Directors Richard Milburn Academy/TX, Inc. McQueeney, Texas

Members of the Board of Directors:

We have audited the accompanying statements of financial position of Richard Milburn Academy/TX, Inc. (a nonprofit organization) (the “charter holder”) as of August 31, 2010, and the related statements of activities and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the charter holder’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The prior year summarized comparative information has been derived from the charter holder’s 2009 financial statements which were audited by us and upon which our report dated January 21, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the charter holder as of August 31, 2010, and the changes in its net assets and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 20, 2011, on our consideration of the charter holder’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit.


Page e333

U282M110023 0023

3

The budgetary comparison schedules on pages 31-33 are not a required part of the general-purpose financial statements but are supplementary information required by the Texas Education Code. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general-purpose financial statements of the charter holder as a whole. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by U.S. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations, and is not a required part of the general-purpose financial statements. The specific-purpose financial statements and schedules on pages 16-41 are likewise presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the general-purpose financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements as a whole.

Winter Park, Florida January 20, 2011


Page e334

U282M110023 0023


STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

AUGUST 31, 2010 AND 2009

2010 2009ASSETS

Current assets:Cash and cash equivalents 1,703,635$ 2,036,511$ Due from governmental agencies 552,290 331,723Prepaid assets 1,682 37,237

Total current assets 2,257,607 2,405,471

Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net 120,399 163,081Other assets 60,686 35,808

Total assets 2,438,692$ 2,604,360$

LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETSCurrent liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued expenses 742,005$ 1,002,115$ Accrued payroll 173,756 149,883Due to governmental agencies 5,685 5,685Due to affiliates 15,085 32,227

Total liabilities 936,531 1,189,910

Net assets:Unrestricted 120,399 163,081 Temporarily restricted 1,381,762 1,251,369

Total net assets 1,502,161 1,414,450

Total liabilities and net assets 2,438,692$ 2,604,360$

The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

4


Page e335

U282M110023 0023


STATEMENTS OF ACTIVITIES

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2010(WITH COMPARATIVE TOTALS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2009)

TemporarilyUnrestricted Restricted 2010 2009

Local support:Interest and other revenue 3,395$ -$ 3,395$ 9,059$

Total local support 3,395 - 3,395 9,059

State program revenues:Foundation School Program 7,456,262 170,213 7,626,475 6,599,602 Other state aid 52,113 - 52,113 43,950

Total state program revenues 7,508,375 170,213 7,678,588 6,643,552

Federal program revenues:ESEA Title I, Part A 288,634 - 288,634 269,691 ESEA Title II, Part A 26,901 - 26,901 63,043 ESEA Title II, Part D - - - 1,186 ESEA Title IV, Part A 753 - 753 1,267 ESEA School Improvement Plan 887,270 - 887,270 160,312 IDEA, Part B 258,513 - 258,513 157,990 E-Rate 31,337 - 31,337 9,093 State Fiscal Stabilization Funds 119,735 - 119,735 -

Total federal program revenues 1,613,143 - 1,613,143 662,582

Net assets released from restrictions:Restrictions satisfied by payment 39,820 (39,820) - -

Total revenues and net assets released from restrictions 9,164,733$ 130,393$ 9,295,126$ 7,315,193$

Totals

REVENUES


5


Page e336

U282M110023 0023




(continued)


Program services:Instruction and instruction-related 4,359,298$ -$ 4,359,298$ 2,933,452$ Instructional and school leadership 1,064,230 - 1,064,230 841,651

Support services:Administrative support services 1,975,875 - 1,975,875 1,533,398Support services - student 518,227 - 518,227 438,959Support services - non-student based 1,289,785 - 1,289,785 1,041,692

Total expenses 9,207,415 - 9,207,415 6,789,152

Change in net assets (42,682) 130,393 87,711 526,041

Net assets, beginning of year as previously reported 1,414,450 - 1,414,450 1,202,358

Prior period restatement (see Note 9) (1,251,369) 1,251,369 - -

Net assets, beginning of year as restated 163,081 1,251,369 1,414,450 1,202,358

Net deficit transferred in from RMA, Inc. (see Note 2) - - - (313,949)

Net assets, end of year 120,399$ 1,381,762$ 1,502,161$ 1,414,450$

Totals

EXPENSES


6


Page e337

U282M110023 0023


STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2010 AND 2009

2010 2009CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Foundation School Program payments 7,657,278$ 6,340,055$ Grant payments 1,413,886 664,939 Miscellaneous sources 3,395 8,997 Payments to vendors for goods and services rendered (4,715,646) (2,819,019) Payments to personnel for services rendered (4,641,825) (3,538,941)

Net cash (used for) provided by operating activities (282,912) 656,031

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIESPurchase of furniture, fixtures and equipment (49,964) (59,032)

Net cash used for investing activities (49,964) (59,032)

Net (decrease) increase in cash (332,876) 596,999

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 2,036,511 1,290,060 Cash transferred in from RMA, Inc. (see Note 2) - 149,452

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year 1,703,635$ 2,036,511$

Reconciliation of change in net assets to net cash(used for) provided by operating activities:Change in net assets 87,711$ 526,041$ Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to net cash (used for) provided by operating activities, net of assets and liabilities transferred in from RMA, Inc. (see Note 2):

Depreciation 92,646 115,331 Loss on disposal of furniture, fixtures and equipment - 3,981 (Increase) decrease in assets:

Due from governmental agencies (220,567) (24,433) Prepaid assets 35,555 9,512 Other assets (24,878) 49,710

Increase (decrease) in liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued expenses (260,110) 274,822 Accrued payroll 23,873 (8,208) Due to governmental agencies - (276,769) Due to affiliates (17,142) (13,956)

Net cash (used for) provided by operating activities (282,912)$ 656,031$


7


Page e338

U282M110023 0023


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31,2010 AND 2009

8

1 ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Organization Richard Milburn Academy/TX, Inc. (the “charter holder” or the “Organization”) is a not-for-profit organization incorporated in the State of Texas in 2000. The governing body of the Organization is the not-for-profit organization’s Board of Directors, which is composed of four members. The Board of Directors is selected pursuant to the bylaws of the Organization and has the authority to make decisions, appoint the chief executive officer of the Organization, and significantly influence operations. The Board of Directors has the primary accountability for the fiscal affairs of the Organization. The Organization provided general education services for students in grades nine through twelve in five individual charter school campuses in Texas. Effective January 1, 2009, the Organization increased the number of individual charter school campuses from three to five. Three of the individual charter schools operate under a single charter of the Organization’s Odessa campus (see Note 2). Each individual school operates under an open enrollment charter granted by the State of Texas Board of Education. One charter was renewed for a period of ten years, which ends July 31, 2015, and is subject to review and renewal prior to the expiration date of the charter. The remaining charters have submitted an application for renewal and the existing charters will not expire until the Texas Education Agency (“TEA”) has made a decision regarding the applications. The Organization is part of the public school system of the State of Texas and, therefore, is entitled to distributions from the Foundation School Program, as well as other state and federal grants received through the State of Texas. The Organization does not have the authority to impose ad valorem taxes or to change the price of tuition. Since the Organization received funding from local, state, and federal government sources, it must comply with the requirements of the entities providing those funds. Recently adopted accounting pronouncements During fiscal year 2010, the Organization adopted changes issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) related to disclosure of subsequent events. These changes require the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date (that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued). The Organization has evaluated subsequent events through January 20, 2011, which is the date the financial statements were available to be issued. The Organization has adopted changes issued by the FASB related to authoritative hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) during its year ended August 31, 2010. These changes establish the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP.


Page e339

U282M110023 0023


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

9

The Organization adopted the ASC guidance relating to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during the year ended August 31, 2010. This guidance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position that an entity takes or expects to take in a tax return. The Organization recognizes tax benefits only to the extent that the Organization believes it is “more likely than not” that its tax positions will be sustained upon an examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or the applicable state taxing authority. This pronouncement is applicable to not-for-profit organizations that may be conducting unrelated business activities, which are potentially subject to income taxes, including state income taxes. The Organization assesses its income tax positions, including its continuing tax status as a not-for-profit entity, and recognizes tax benefits only to the extent that the Organization believes it is “more likely than not” that its tax positions will be sustained upon an examination by the IRS. Accordingly, there is no provision for Federal income taxes in the financial statements, as the Organization believes all tax positions, including its continuing status as a not-for-profit entity, have a greater than a 50% chance of realization after an IRS audit. State income taxes, which may be due in certain jurisdictions, have been assessed following the same “more likely than not” measurement threshold. At adoption of the guidance, the Organization did not record any cumulative effect adjustment, and it did not accrue interest expense or penalties related to any uncertain Federal or State income tax positions. Interest and penalties, if incurred, would be recognized as a component of income tax expense. There are no open Federal or State tax years under audit. Basis of presentation The accompanying general-purpose financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with the FASB ASC. The accounting system is organized pursuant to the Special Supplement to Financial Accounting and Reporting – Non-profit Charter School Chart of Accounts, a module of the TEA Financial Accountability Resource Guide. The Organization has adopted the FASB ASC guidance related to contributions received and contributions made and financial statements of not-for-profit organizations. This guidance requires the organization to distinguish between contributions that increase permanently restricted net assets, temporarily restricted net assets and unrestricted net assets. It also requires recognition of contributions, including contributed services meeting certain criteria, at fair values. This guidance also establishes standards for general-purpose external financial statements of not-for-profit organizations and requires a statement of financial position, a statement of activities, a statement of cash flows and a statement of functional expenses.


Page e340

U282M110023 0023



10

Net assets and revenues, expenses, gains, and losses are classified based on the existence or absence of donor-imposed restrictions. Accordingly, net assets of the Organization and changes therein are classified and reported as follows:

Unrestricted – net assets that are not subject to donor-imposed restrictions.

Temporarily restricted – net assets subject to donor-imposed restrictions that may or will be met, either by actions of the Organization and/or the passage of time.

Permanently restricted – net assets required to be maintained in perpetuity with only

the income to be used for the Organization’s activities due to donor-imposed restrictions. Support that is restricted by the donor is reported as an increase in temporarily restricted or permanently restricted net assets in the reporting period in which the support is recognized. When a restriction expires, temporarily restricted net assets are reclassified to unrestricted net assets and reported in the statement of activities as net assets released from restrictions. Revenues received that are temporarily restricted whose restrictions are met in the same year as received are shown as unrestricted revenues, which is a policy that has been applied consistently from period to period. The financial statements include certain prior-year summarized comparative information in total but not by net asset class. Such information does not include sufficient detail to constitute a presentation in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, such information should be read in conjunction with the Organization’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009, from which the summarized information was derived. Functional expenses Since all expenses are incurred in connection with school operations, a statement of functional expenses is not presented. Reclassifications Certain reclassifications were made in the 2009 amounts to conform to their classifications in fiscal year 2010. Cash and cash equivalents The Organization’s cash consists primarily of demand deposits with financial institutions. All funds on deposit are continuously secured in accordance with the Texas Public Funds Collateral Act, Chapter 2257 of the Texas Government Code.


Page e341

U282M110023 0023



11

Capitalized assets and depreciation Capital assets acquired, which include furniture, fixtures and equipment, are reported at cost, net of accumulated depreciation, in the general-purpose and specific-purpose financial statements. The Organization’s policy is to capitalize assets that have an estimated useful life of more than one year. Expenditures for additions, major renewals and betterments are capitalized, and maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Donated assets are recorded at fair value at the date of donation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are as follows: Years Furniture, fixtures and equipment 3 – 5 Use of estimates In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the statements of financial position and affect revenues and expenses for the periods presented. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. In addition, Foundation School Program revenue in the accompanying financial statements is based upon the allocation of these funds by the TEA at the time of issuance of these financial statements. The allocation by the TEA is subject to audit and adjustment in future years and, as such, all revisions to the allocation after issuance of the financial statements are adjusted prospectively (see Note 8). 2 ORGANIZATION RESTRUCTURING In November 2008, an agreement was reached between the Organization, Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. (an entity related by common board membership) and the TEA. Pursuant to this agreement, Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. agreed to surrender the open-enrollment charter of its Midland and Lubbock campuses to the TEA. The purpose of the surrender was to consolidate the campuses under a single charter with the Organization’s Odessa campus. In applying for and receiving the Midland and Lubbock campuses as expansion campuses, the Organization assumed all liabilities and responsibility for all debts, obligations, liabilities and other lawful duties and obligations of the two open-enrollment charters surrendered. Effective January 1, 2009, the Organization completed the transfer of all assets, liabilities and net deficits of Midland and Lubbock from Richard Milburn Academy, Inc., and recorded the transfer at historical net carrying value as of that date. The operations of the Midland and Lubbock campuses from January 1, 2009 through August 31, 2009 are included in the statements of activities for the year ended August 31, 2009, and are included within the operations of Odessa as these locations are now operating under its charter. Effective January 1, 2009, the Organization increased the number of individual charter schools from three to five. Three of the individual charter schools operate under a single charter of the Organization’s Odessa campus.


Page e342

U282M110023 0023



12

3 DUE FROM/TO GOVERMENTAL AGENCIES Due from governmental agencies in the accompanying statements of financial position include approximately $228,000 and $28,000 in funds due from federal agencies and approximately $325,000 and $303,000 due from TEA as of August 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Based on the collectibility of funds from these sources, in the opinion of management, an allowance for doubtful accounts is not considered necessary. 4 FURNITURE, FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net, as of August 31, 2010 and 2009 consisted of the following:

2010 2009

Furniture, fixtures and equipment 814,806$ 764,842$ Less: accumulated depreciation (694,407) (601,761)

Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net 120,399$ 163,081$

Capitalized assets acquired with public funds received by the Organization for the operation of the individual schools of the Organization constitute public property pursuant to Chapter 12 of the Texas Education Code. These capitalized asset amounts are identified on the Schedules of Capital Assets for each individual charter school by respective charter on pages 28-30. Depreciation expense for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $93,000 and $115,000, respectively. 5 PENSION PLAN OBLIGATIONS Defined benefit plan The Organization contributes to the Teacher Retirement System of Texas (the “System”), a public employee retirement system. The System is a cost-sharing, multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan with one exception: all risks and costs are not borne by the Organization, but are the liability of the State of Texas. The System provides service retirement and disability retirement benefits and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. The System operates under the authority of provisions contained primarily in Texas Government Code, Title 8, Public Retirement Systems, Subtitle C, Teacher Retirement System of Texas, which is subject to amendment by the Texas Legislature. Under provisions in State law, plan members are required to contribute 7.4% of their annual covered salary, and the State of Texas contributes an amount equal to 6.0% of the


Page e343

U282M110023 0023



13

Organization’s covered payroll. Additionally, the Organization contributes 6.58% of the employees’ annual covered salary during the first three months of employment, and 0.55% thereafter. The Organization’s contributions to the System for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009 were approximately $87,000 and $175,000, respectively, and were equal to the required contributions for each year. 401(k) plan The Organization also participates in a profit-sharing plan of a related party. The plan operates under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, whereby all eligible employees are entitled to defer up to $16,500 during the 2010 and 2009 calendar years. Substantially all employees are eligible to participate in the plan depending on the length of service and attainment of minimum age requirements. Under the terms of the plan, the Organization contributes an amount to the plan at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Employer contributions to the plan in fiscal 2010 and 2009 were approximately $800 and $400, respectively. 6 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS During the routine course of business, invoices and payroll, which apply to both the Organization and an affiliate, Richard Milburn Academy, Inc., may be paid by a single entity creating an affiliate receivable or payable. The Organization tracks the amounts due to or from each affiliated entity or school separately, and these amounts are presented separately in the accompanying financial statements. Amounts due to affiliates as of August 31, 2010 and 2009 were approximately $15,000 and $32,000, respectively. 7 RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Workers’ compensation coverage, employee health, general liability, professional liability and property coverages are being provided through purchased commercial insurance with minimum deductibles for each line of coverage. Settled claims resulting from these risks have historically not exceeded commercial coverage. 8 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES Grants The Organization participates in state and federal grant programs, which are governed by various rules and regulations of the grantor agencies. Costs charged to the respective grant programs are subject to audit and adjustment by the grantor agencies; therefore, to the extent that the Organization has not complied with the rules and regulations governing the grants, refunds of any money received may be required and the collectibility of any related receivable as of August 31, 2010 may be impaired.


Page e344

U282M110023 0023



14

The Organization is required to spend a minimum amount of its allocation of special program allotments from the TEA during the year they are awarded. As of August 31, 2010, management does not believe there are any amounts due to the TEA for unexpended special program allotments. In the opinion of management, there are no significant unrecorded contingent liabilities relating to compliance with the rules and regulations governing these grants. Lease commitments The Organization leases its facilities under non-cancelable operating leases, which contain varying renewal options. Approximate aggregate remaining minimum rental commitments as of August 31, 2010 under these leases are summarized as follows:

Fiscal Year Ending August 31,2011 605,679$ 2012 638,257 2013 431,703 2014 153,446 2015 138,276

Total 1,967,361$

Rent expense for all operating leases for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $618,000 and $540,000, respectively. Subsequent to August 31, 2010, the Organization entered into a lease agreement, which requires monthly payments of $7,562 from October 1, 2010 through September 1, 2011. Management fees The Organization contracts with a management company for management and administrative services. The management agreements provide, among other things, for the payment of a management fee calculated based upon the gross revenues of each individual school within the Organization. The management agreements were executed following a full and open competition and were approved by the Board of Directors. For the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009, the Organization has incurred approximately $1,356,000 and $1,073,000 of management fees, respectively. Amounts due to the management company as of August 31, 2010 and 2009 are approximately $468,000 and $636,000, respectively, and are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying financial statements. State funding The Organization’s revenue stream is largely dependent upon the general state of the economy and the amounts allotted to the TEA by the state legislature. The allocation by the TEA is


Page e345

U282M110023 0023



15

subject to audit and adjustment in future years and, as such, all revisions to the allocation after issuance of the financial statements are adjusted prospectively. 9 PRIOR PERIOD RESTATEMENT All Foundation School Program funding received from the TEA is restricted by state law to be used for the benefit of the students of the respective charter school. Net assets previously reported as unrestricted have been restated in the current year as temporarily restricted to reflect those funds received but not yet disbursed.


Page e346

U282M110023 0023

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY/TX, INC. - FORT WORTH


AUGUST 31, 2010 AND 2009

2010 2009ASSETS

Current assets:Cash and cash equivalents 211,154$ 246,283$ Due from governmental agencies 94,067 70,488 Prepaid assets - 7,642 Due from affiliates - 10,224

Total current assets 305,221 334,637

Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net 139 4,393 Other assets 19,695 9,534

Total assets 325,055$ 348,564$


Accounts payable and accrued expenses 78,260$ 59,864$ Accrued payroll 33,985 35,291 Due to affiliates 3,475 -

Total liabilities 115,720 95,155

Net assets:Unrestricted 139 4,393 Temporarily restricted 209,196 249,016

Total net assets 209,335 253,409

Total liabilities and net assets 325,055$ 348,564$

See accompanying notes to financial statements and independent auditor's report.

16


Page e347

U282M110023 0023

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY/TX, INC. - HOUSTON


AUGUST 31, 2010 AND 2009

2010 2009ASSETS

Current assets:Cash and cash equivalents 377,544$ 430,086$ Due from governmental agencies 146,923 54,080 Prepaid assets - 9,627


Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net 55,931 81,424 Other assets 13,607 8,500

Total assets 594,005$ 583,717$


Accounts payable and accrued expenses 65,983$ 35,947$ Accrued payroll 36,593 40,177 Due to governmental agencies 5,685 5,685 Due to affiliates 4,886 1,028


Net assets:Unrestricted 55,931 81,424 Temporarily restricted 424,927 419,456




17


Page e348

U282M110023 0023

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY/TX, INC. - ODESSA


AUGUST 31, 2010 AND 2009

2010 2009ASSETS

Current assets:Cash and cash equivalents 1,114,101$ 1,357,472$ Due from governmental agencies 311,300 142,829 Prepaid assets - 19,968



Total assets 1,502,767$ 1,614,855$


Accounts payable and accrued expenses 558,917$ 842,083$ Accrued payroll 98,164 72,486 Due to affiliates 33,718 40,125






18


Page e349

U282M110023 0023





REVENUESLocal support:

5740 Other revenues from local sources 631$ -$ 631$ 2,416$

State program revenues:5810 Foundation School Program Act 1,365,909 - 1,365,909 1,518,0135820 State program revenues distributed

by Texas Education Agency 4,223 - 4,223 3,528

Total state program revenues 1,370,132 - 1,370,132 1,521,541

Federal program revenues:5920 Federal revenues distributed by

Texas Education Agency 384,549 - 384,549 115,316

Net assets released from restrictions:Restrictions satisfied by payment 39,820 (39,820) - -

Total revenues and net assets released from restrictions 1,795,132 (39,820) 1,755,312 1,639,273

EXPENSES11 Instruction 822,728 - 822,728 665,001 12 Instructional resources and media 9,260 - 9,260 6,991 13 Curriculum development and

instructional staff development 24,400 - 24,400 36,714 21 Instructional leadership 50 - 50 - 23 School leadership 207,873 - 207,873 197,135 31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 85,519 - 85,519 75,324 32 Social work services 13 - 13 918 33 Health services 101 - 101 488 36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities 15,178 - 15,178 13,771 41 General administration 379,468 - 379,468 349,093 51 Plant maintenance and operation 187,059 - 187,059 177,753 52 Security and monitoring services 44,206 - 44,206 38,624 53 Data processing services 6,415 - 6,415 12,158 61 Community services 17,116 - 17,116 -

Total expenses 1,799,386 - 1,799,386 1,573,970

Change in net assets (4,254) (39,820) (44,074) 65,303

Net assets, beginning of year as previously reported 253,409 - 253,409 188,106

Prior period restatement (see Note 9) (249,016) 249,016 - -

Net assets, beginning of year as restated 4,393 249,016 253,409 188,106

Net assets, end of year 139$ 209,196$ 209,335$ 253,409$

Totals


19


Page e350

U282M110023 0023






5740 Other revenues from local sources 737$ -$ 737$ 312$

State program revenues:5810 Foundation School Program Act 2,142,850 5,471 2,148,321 1,864,7725820 State program revenues distributed





Net assets released from restrictions:Restrictions satisfied by payment - - - -

Total revenues and net assets released from restrictions 2,608,056 5,471 2,613,527 2,069,772

EXPENSES11 Instruction 1,088,642 - 1,088,642 716,578 12 Instructional resources and media 7,311 - 7,311 3,673 13 Curriculum development and

instructional staff development 125,692 - 125,692 72,580 21 Instructional leadership 2,588 - 2,588 - 23 School leadership 310,652 - 310,652 263,304 31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 66,500 - 66,500 56,198 32 Social work services 15,022 - 15,022 12,280 33 Health services - - - 933 36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities 30,737 - 30,737 40,073 41 General administration 502,953 - 502,953 415,699 51 Plant maintenance and operation 405,569 - 405,569 351,289 52 Security and monitoring services 58,226 - 58,226 11,164 53 Data processing services 286 - 286 24,826 61 Community services 19,371 - 19,371 6,233

Total expenses 2,633,549 - 2,633,549 1,974,830

Change in net assets (25,493) 5,471 (20,022) 94,942



Net assets, beginning of year as restated 81,424 419,456 500,880 405,938

Net assets, end of year 55,931$ 424,927$ 480,858$ 500,880$

Totals


20


Page e351

U282M110023 0023






5740 Other revenues from local sources 2,027$ -$ 2,027$ 6,331$








EXPENSES11 Instruction 2,050,419 - 2,050,419 1,311,337 12 Instructional resources and media 26,132 - 26,132 17,220 13 Curriculum development and

instructional staff development 204,714 - 204,714 103,358 23 School leadership 543,067 - 543,067 381,212 31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 219,911 - 219,911 142,622 32 Social work services 65,265 - 65,265 73,735 33 Health services 56 - 56 - 36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities 19,925 - 19,925 22,617 41 General administration 1,093,454 - 1,093,454 785,375 51 Plant maintenance and operation 456,363 - 456,363 344,567 52 Security and monitoring services 72,640 - 72,640 20,836 53 Data processing services 20,367 - 20,367 36,127 61 Community services 2,167 - 2,167 1,346

Total expenses 4,774,480 - 4,774,480 3,240,352

Change in net assets (22,825) 174,632 151,807 365,796



Net assets, beginning of year as restated 76,896 583,265 660,161 608,314 Net deficit transferred in from RMA, Inc. (see Note 2) - - - (313,949)

Net assets, end of year 54,071$ 757,897$ 811,968$ 660,161$

Totals


21


Page e352

U282M110023 0023





Foundation School Program payments 1,379,279$ 1,452,861$ Grant payments 351,823 118,059Miscellaneous sources 631 2,416Payments to vendors for goods and services rendered (718,615) (671,954) Payments to personnel for services rendered (1,048,247) (867,137)


Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 246,283 212,038

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year 211,154$ 246,283$

Reconciliation of change in net assets to net cash(used for) provided by operating activities:Change in net assets (44,074)$ 65,303$ Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to net cash (used for) provided by operating activities:

Depreciation 4,254 11,956 (Increase) decrease in assets:

Due from governmental agencies (23,579) (23,068) Prepaid assets 7,642 8,821 Other assets (10,161) 4,821 Due from affiliates 10,224 (8,053)

Increase (decrease) in liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued expenses 18,396 13,028 Accrued payroll (1,306) 4,306 Due to governmental agencies - (42,869) Due to affiliates 3,475 -



22


Page e353

U282M110023 0023





Foundation School Program payments 2,102,368$ 1,761,215$ Grant payments 417,579 173,218Miscellaneous sources 737 250Payments to vendors for goods and services rendered (1,330,582) (873,441) Payments to personnel for services rendered (1,227,015) (1,030,091)






Reconciliation of change in net assets to net cash(used for) provided by operating activities:Change in net assets (20,022)$ 94,942$ Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to net cash (used for) provided by operating activities:

Depreciation 41,122 56,270 Loss on disposal of furniture, fixtures and equipment - 3,981 (Increase) decrease in assets:

Due from governmental agencies (92,843) 2,113 Prepaid assets 9,627 1,896 Other assets (5,107) 9,730 Due from affiliates - 22,123

Increase (decrease) in liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued expenses 30,036 (25,480) Accrued payroll (3,584) 1,750 Due to governmental agencies - (137,202) Due to affiliates 3,858 1,028



23


Page e354

U282M110023 0023





Foundation School Program payments 4,111,305$ 3,128,409$ Grant payments 644,484 373,662Miscellaneous sources 2,027 6,331Payments to vendors for goods and services rendered (2,607,849) (1,274,630) Payments to personnel for services rendered (2,369,648) (1,642,428)




Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 1,357,472 669,526Cash transferred in from RMA, Inc. (see Note 2) - 149,452

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year 1,114,101$ 1,357,472$

Reconciliation of change in net assets to net cash(used for) provided by operating activities:Change in net assets 151,807$ 365,796$ Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to net cash (used for) provided by operating activities, net of assets and liabilities transferred in from RMA, Inc. (see Note 2):


Due from governmental agencies (168,471) (1,048) Prepaid assets 19,968 (1,205) Other assets (5,605) 35,243 Due from affiliates - 3,185

Increase (decrease) in liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued expenses (283,166) 252,512 Accrued payroll 25,678 (14,979) Due to governmental agencies - (96,698) Due to affiliates (6,407) 2,011



24


Page e355

U282M110023 0023


SCHEDULES OF EXPENSES


2010 2009EXPENSES

6100 Payroll costs 1,046,941$ 871,443$ 6200 Professional and contracted services 563,609 540,197 6300 Supplies and materials 104,619 90,790 6400 Other operating costs 84,217 71,540

Total expenses 1,799,386$ 1,573,970$


25


Page e356

U282M110023 0023




2010 2009EXPENSES

6100 Payroll costs 1,223,431$ 1,031,841$ 6200 Professional and contracted services 1,058,244 684,268 6300 Supplies and materials 189,725 109,861 6400 Other operating costs 162,149 148,860

Total expenses 2,633,549$ 1,974,830$


26


Page e357

U282M110023 0023




2010 2009EXPENSES

6100 Payroll costs 2,395,326$ 1,627,449$ 6200 Professional and contracted services 1,660,259 1,129,331 6300 Supplies and materials 418,830 258,893 6400 Other operating costs 300,065 224,679

Total expenses 4,774,480$ 3,240,352$


27


Page e358

U282M110023 0023


SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL ASSETS

AUGUST 31, 2010

Local State Federal

1110 Cash -$ 211,154$ -$ 1539 Furniture and equipment - 9,176 70,837

Total -$ 220,330$ 70,837$

Ownership Interest


28


Page e359

U282M110023 0023



AUGUST 31, 2010

Local State Federal


Total -$ 550,462$ 104,266$

Ownership Interest


29


Page e360

U282M110023 0023



AUGUST 31, 2010

Local State Federal

1110 Cash -$ 1,114,101$ -$ 1539 Furniture and equipment - 239,391 204,683

Total -$ 1,353,492$ 204,683$

Ownership Interest


30


Page e361

U282M110023 0023


BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2010

Variance withActual Final Budget-

(Budgetary PositiveOriginal Final Basis) (Negative)


5740 Other revenues from local sources -$ -$ 631$ 631$

State program revenues:5810 Foundation School Program Act 1,431,297 1,431,297 1,365,909 (65,388) 5820 State program revenues distributed

by Texas Education Agency - - 4,223 4,223


Texas Education Agency 424,610 433,770 384,549 (49,221)

Total revenues 1,855,907 1,865,067 1,755,312 (109,755)

EXPENSES11 Instruction 792,493 801,050 822,728 (21,678) 12 Instructional resources and media 10,750 10,750 9,260 1,490 13 Curriculum development and

instructional staff development 49,152 45,152 24,400 20,752 21 Instructional leadership 1,800 1,800 50 1,750 23 School leadership 206,064 206,064 207,873 (1,809) 31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 92,939 97,461 85,519 11,942 32 Social work services 2,500 2,500 13 2,487 33 Health services 5,200 5,200 101 5,099 34 Student transportation 500 500 - 500 35 Food services 14,000 14,000 - 14,000 36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities - - 15,178 (15,178) 41 General administration 283,361 283,361 379,468 (96,107) 51 Plant maintenance and operation 168,268 168,268 187,059 (18,791) 52 Security and monitoring services 34,800 34,881 44,206 (9,325) 53 Data processing services 12,322 12,322 6,415 5,907 61 Community services 1,200 1,200 17,116 (15,916) 81 Fund raising 500 500 - 500

Total expenses 1,675,849 1,685,009 1,799,386 (114,377)

Change in net assets 180,058 180,058 (44,074) (224,132)

Net assets, beginning of year 253,409 253,409 253,409 -

Net assets, end of year 433,467$ 433,467$ 209,335$ (224,132)$

Budgeted Amounts

See independent auditor's report.

31


Page e362

U282M110023 0023







5740 Other revenues from local sources -$ -$ 737$ 737$

State program revenues:5810 Foundation School Program Act 1,842,849 1,842,849 2,148,321 305,472 5820 State program revenues distributed




Total revenues 2,580,987 2,656,272 2,613,527 (42,745)

EXPENSES11 Instruction 1,212,951 1,270,599 1,088,642 181,957 12 Instructional resources and media 6,900 6,900 7,311 (411) 13 Curriculum development and

instructional staff development 104,235 132,116 125,692 6,424 21 Instructional leadership - 15,000 2,588 12,412 23 School leadership 219,048 219,048 310,652 (91,604) 31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 70,625 60,285 66,500 (6,215) 32 Social work services 21,760 21,760 15,022 6,738 33 Health services 1,000 7,000 - 7,000 34 Student transportation - - - - 35 Food services - - - - 36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities 59,775 59,775 30,737 29,038 41 General administration 363,725 363,725 502,953 (139,228) 51 Plant maintenance and operation 325,620 325,620 405,569 (79,949) 52 Security and monitoring services 65,258 44,354 58,226 (13,872) 53 Data processing services 24,803 24,803 286 24,517 61 Community services 5,600 5,600 19,371 (13,771)

Total expenses 2,481,300 2,556,585 2,633,549 (76,964)

Change in net assets 99,687 99,687 (20,022) (119,709)



Budgeted Amounts


32


Page e363

U282M110023 0023







5740 Other revenues from local sources -$ -$ 2,027$ 2,027$




Texas Education Agency 1,674,143 1,727,296 770,765 (956,531)

Total revenues 5,189,690 5,242,843 4,926,287 (316,556)

EXPENSES11 Instruction 2,109,845 2,251,250 2,050,419 200,831 12 Instructional resources and media 26,500 24,500 26,132 (1,632) 13 Curriculum development and

instructional staff development 315,791 246,364 204,714 41,650 21 Instructional leadership 4,500 500 - 500 23 School leadership 451,336 464,936 543,067 (78,131) 31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 131,208 134,208 219,911 (85,703) 32 Social work services 28,396 28,396 65,265 (36,869) 33 Health services 6,000 5,500 56 5,444 34 Student transportation 1,500 1,500 - 1,500 35 Food services - - - - 36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities 67,200 40,675 19,925 20,750 41 General administration 932,868 931,868 1,093,454 (161,586) 51 Plant maintenance and operation 494,291 498,291 456,363 41,928 52 Security and monitoring services 89,591 87,591 72,640 14,951 53 Data processing services 57,744 50,344 20,367 29,977 61 Community services 12,690 16,690 2,167 14,523 81 Fund raising 100 100 - 100

Total expenses 4,729,560 4,782,713 4,774,480 8,233

Change in net assets 460,130 460,130 151,807 (308,323)


Net assets, end of year 1,120,291$ 1,120,291$ 811,968$ (308,323)$

Budgeted Amounts


33


Page e364

U282M110023 0023


Page e365

U282M110023 0023


Page e366

U282M110023 0023


Page e367

U282M110023 0023


Page e368

U282M110023 0023


Page e369

U282M110023 0023


Page e370

U282M110023 0023


Page e371

U282M110023 0023


Page e372

U282M110023 0023


SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS(continued)

Federal Grantor/ FederalPass-Through Grantor/ NOGA CFDA Grant

Program Title ID Numbers Number Period Expenditures

United States Department of Education / 10610101220812

Texas Board of Education / Title I 10610101101854

Grants to Local Educational Agencies 10610101068801

10610101068801

10610101068801 84.010 8/28/09 - 9/30/10 219,726$


Texas Board of Education / ARRA - Title I 10551001101854


10551001068801

10551001068801 84.389 8/26/09 - 9/30/11 68,908

Total Title I Cluster 288,634


Texas Board of Education / Special 106600011018546600

Education-Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) 106600010688016600

106600010688016600

106600010688016600 84.027 8/27/09 - 9/30/10 193,766

United States Department of Education / Texas Board of Education / ARRA - 10554001220812

Special Education-Grants to States 10554001068801

(IDEA, Part B) 10554001068801 84.391 7/1/09 - 9/30/11 64,747

Total IDEA, Part B Cluster 258,513

United States Department of Education / Texas Board of Education / Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities - 10691001220812

State Grants 10691001101854 84.184 8/28/09 - 9/30/10 753


Texas Board of Education / Title II 10694501101854

Improving Teacher Quality State Grants 10694501068801

10694501068801

10694501068801 84.367 8/28/09 - 9/30/10 26,901

See accompanying note to the schedule of expenditures of federal awards and independent auditor's report.

42


Page e373

U282M110023 0023



Federal Grantor/ FederalPass-Through Grantor/ NOGA CFDA Grant

Program Title ID Numbers Number Period Expenditures


Texas Board of Education / 10610104101854000

School Improvement Grants 10610701101854000

10610104068801002

10610104068801003

10610701068801003

10610104068801002 84.377 10/21/09 - 9/30/10 694,003


Texas Board of Education / 10551004101854001

ARRA - School Improvement Grants 10551004068801003

10551004068801000

10610701068801002 84.377A 10/21/09 - 9/30/10 193,267

Total School Improvement Grant Cluster 887,270


Texas Board of Education / ARRA - 10557001101854

State Fiscal Stabilization Fund - 10557001068801

Education State Grants 10557001068801

10557001068801 84.394 9/30/09 - 9/30/10 119,735

Federal Communications Commission / Federal Technological Assistance (E-Rate) n/a n/a 9/1/09 - 8/31/10 31,337

Total Expenditures of Federal Awards 1,613,143$

See accompanying note to the schedule of expenditures of federal awards and independent auditor's report.

43


Page e374

U282M110023 0023


NOTE TO SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS


44

1 SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of the Organization and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations.


Page e375

U282M110023 0023

45

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED

ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

Board of Directors Richard Milburn Academy/TX, Inc. McQueeney, Texas

Members of the Board of Directors: We have audited the financial statements of Richard Milburn Academy/TX Inc., (a nonprofit organization) (the “Organization”), as of and for the year ended August 31, 2010, and have issued our report thereon dated January 20, 2011. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Organization’s internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Organization’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Organization’s internal control over financial reporting. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that might be deficiencies, significant deficiencies, or material weaknesses. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. However, we identified a deficiency in internal control over financial reporting, described as finding 2010-1 in the accompanying schedule of findings and


Page e376

U282M110023 0023

46

questioned costs that we consider to be significant deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Organization’s financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards and which are described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs as items 2010-3 and 2010-4. The Organization’s response to the findings identified in our audit is described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs and in the corrective action plan on pages 54-57. We did not audit the Organization’s response and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Directors, management of the Organization, the Texas Education Agency and federal awarding agencies and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.


.


Page e377

U282M110023 0023

47

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ON COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO EACH MAJOR PROGRAM AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL

OVER COMPLIANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH OMB CIRCULAR A-133 Board of Directors Richard Milburn Academy/TX, Inc. McQueeney, Texas Members of the Board of Directors: Compliance We have audited the compliance of Richard Milburn Academy/TX, Inc. (a nonprofit organization) (the “Organization”) with the types of compliance requirements described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement that are applicable to each of its major federal programs for the year ended August 31, 2010. The Organization’s major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor’s results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. Compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to each of its major federal programs is the responsibility of the Organization’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Organization’s compliance based on our audit. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Organization’s compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our audit does not provide a legal determination of the Organization’s compliance with those requirements. In our opinion, the Organization complied, in all material respects, with the requirements referred to above that are applicable to each of its major federal programs for the year ended August 31, 2010. However, the results of our auditing procedures disclosed an instance of noncompliance with those requirements, which is required to be reported in accordance with OMB Circular A-133 and which is described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs as item 2010-2.


Page e378

U282M110023 0023

48

Internal Control Over Compliance Management of the Organization is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to federal programs. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Organization’s internal control over compliance with the requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on compliance and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Organization’s internal control over compliance. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be deficiencies, significant deficiencies, or material weaknesses. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. The Organization’s response to the findings identified in our audit is described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs and in the corrective action plan on pages 54-57. We did not audit the Organization’s response and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Directors, management of the Organization, the Texas Education Agency and federal awarding agencies and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



Page e379

U282M110023 0023


49

SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2010 Section I - Summary of Auditor’s Results Financial Statements Type of auditor’s report issued: Unqualified Internal control over financial reporting: Material weaknesses identified? No Significant deficiencies identified that are not considered

to be material weaknesses? Yes Noncompliance material to financial statements noted? No Federal Awards Internal control over major programs: Material weaknesses identified? No Significant deficiencies identified that are not considered

to be material weaknesses? None reported Type of auditor’s report issued on compliance for major programs: Unqualified Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with section 510(a) of OMB Circular A-133? Yes Identification of major federal programs: CFDA Number Grant Period Name of Federal Program

84.010/84.389 8/26/09 – 9/30/11 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 84.377/84.377A 10/21/09 – 9/30/10 School Improvement Grants

Dollar threshold used to distinguish between type A and type B programs: $300,000 Auditee qualified as a low-risk auditee? No


Page e380

U282M110023 0023


50

SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (continued)

Section II - Financial Statement Findings Finding No. 2010-1 – Significant Deficiency Statement of condition:

The Organization’s locations did not consistently communicate all adjustments and disposals of fixed assets to the corporate office. In addition, the fixed asset schedules were not reconciled between the location’s listing and the corporate office’s listing on a timely basis.

Context:

During our audit procedures, we noted that adjustments and disposals were not consistently communicated to the corporate office. Additionally, the fixed asset schedules have not been reconciled to the individual location’s fixed asset listings resulting in different fixed asset schedules for the same respective location.

Effect of condition:

The Organization did not have formal policies and procedures in place to mitigate reporting risks in relation to the Organization’s fixed assets.

Recommendation:

We recommend that the Organization implement formal policies and procedures to ensure that all adjustments and disposals are communicated in a timely manner to corporate and that an annual reconciliation be performed for all locations.

Management’s response: Management agreed with this finding and will implement formal policies and procedures to improve upon their internal control over financial reporting. See corrective action plan on pages 54-57.

Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs Finding No. 2010-2 Statement of condition:

The Organization could not provide documentation on the employee time and effort allocation rates for payroll expenses charged to Federal programs.

Context:

Certain Federal programs require recipients to maintain documentation on employee time and effort for payroll expenses charged to Federal programs. We noted that the required documentation for those allocations was not available.

Effect of condition: The Organization was not able to provide the necessary documentation to support its compliance with applicable grant requirements.


Page e381

U282M110023 0023


51


Recommendation:

We recommend that the Organization implement formal policies and procedures to ensure that adequate supporting documentation be created and kept in relation to all Federal programs to ensure compliance with their respective requirements.

Management’s response: Management agreed with this finding and will implement formal policies and procedures to improve upon their compliance with federal award requirements. See corrective action plan on pages 54-57.

Section IV – State Award Findings and Questioned Costs Finding No. 2010-3 Statement of condition:

The Organization did not spend the required amount of allotments of Foundation School Program (“FSP”) funding.

Context: The Organization receives FSP allotments, which support various strategic goals. The Organization is required to spend a certain percentage of the funding in the year the allotment is awarded.


The Organization is not in compliance with state requirements concerning the amount of FSP allotments which are to be spent in the year the allotment is awarded.

Recommendation:

We recommend that the Organization implement monitoring controls over minimum expenditure requirements over allotment spending to ensure that all required expenditures are made timely.

Management’s response: Management agreed with this finding and will implement formal policies and procedures to improve upon their compliance with state award requirements. See corrective action plan on pages 54-57.

Finding No. 2010-4 Statement of condition:

The Organization has school employees on the Houston school’s governing board though it was rated academically unacceptable.


Page e382

U282M110023 0023


52


Context:

If a charter school is rated acceptable or higher, then a charter school employee may serve as a member of the governing body of the charter holder or the charter school if the employees do not constitute a quorum of the governing body or any committee of the governing body.


The Organization is not in compliance with state requirements concerning the governing body of the Houston charter school.

Recommendation:

We recommend that the Organization implement controls over school employees on the respective governing boards to ensure that school employees do not serve on the governing boards if the charter school is not rated acceptable or higher.


Section V – Status of Prior Year Audit Findings Finding No. 2009-1: Fixed asset schedule reconciliation During our consideration of the Organization’s controls over reporting fixed assets, we noted that the Organization’s locations did not consistently communicate all adjustments and disposals of fixed assets to the corporate office. In addition, the fixed asset schedules were not reconciled between the location’s listing and the corporate office’s listing on a timely basis. This item is repeated as Finding No. 2010-1. Finding No. 2009-2: Professional development expenditure minimums The Organization did not have any formal monitoring controls in place to ensure that it spent the minimum amount required for professional development expenditures as required by certain Federal grants the Organization received. This item was resolved during the current year. Finding No. 2009-3: Student attendance discrepancies The Organization’s Houston location had material discrepancies in the recording of student attendance as compared to the source documentation, or the source documentation could not be located. In addition, the Organization’s internal audit procedures identified areas of noncompliance and incorrect reporting. However, there were several instances where the discrepancies were not timely corrected.


Page e383

U282M110023 0023


53


This item was resolved during the current year. Finding No. 2009-4: Time and effort documentation The Organization could not fully locate all proper documentation in relation to the payroll allocations within the individual State program intent codes for maintenance of effort and within Federal programs for those allocations for all locations. This item is updated and repeated as Finding No. 2010-2.


Page e384

U282M110023 0023


CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN


54

Findings Corrective Action Activities Responsible Personnel Timeline for

Implementation 2010-1: Reconciliation of Fixed Assets The Organization’s locations did not consistently communicate all adjustments and disposals of fixed assets to the corporate office. In addition, the fixed asset schedules were not reconciled between the location’s listing and the corporate office’s listing on a timely basis.

RMA/TX, Inc. will review and strengthen formal policies and procedures for the reconciliation of fixed assets. School directors and appropriate support staff will be trained in maintaining accurate fixed assets records to ensure that all adjustments and disposals are communicated in a timely manner to corporate. An annual reconciliation will be performed at each location by the end of the fiscal year. Verification of annual reconciled fixed asset listings.

Sally Irvine, RMA TX State Dir.

January, 2011 through March 15, 2011 March 16, 2011 through August 31, 2011 By August 31, 2011 By August 31, 2011


Page e385

U282M110023 0023


CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (continued)

55


Implementation 2010-2: Federal Awards and Time and Effort Certain Federal programs require recipients to maintain documentation on employee time and effort allocation rates for payroll expenses charged to Federal programs. The Organization could not provide documentation on the employee time and effort allocation rates for payroll expenses charged to Federal programs.

RMA/TX, Inc. will adhere to the Federal Guidelines for maintaining documentation on employee time and effort allocation rates for payroll expenses charged to Federal programs. A review of internal processes was conducted and a determination was made that our organization would move to an electronic purchasing system. We have contracted for services with an ESC to provide services for all Federal grant expenditures, including tracking of salary paid from Federal funds. Documentation will be sent to the State Director’s Office for verification of accuracy as compared to time recorded on company timecards. Reclassification of federal payroll dollars will be done if inaccuracies are not corrected within a 30 day time period so that Federal guidelines are adhered to properly. The Organization’s Human Resources Department will be notified should this occur so a new Personnel Action Form (PAF) can be initiated to reflect the change of fund source.

Sally Irvine, RMA TX State Dir. August, 2010 and ongoing Completed November 1, 2010 – August 31, 2011


Page e386

U282M110023 0023



56


Implementation 2010-3: Foundation School Program (FSP) Allocations The Organization receives FSP allotments from the state and is required to spend a certain percentage of the funding in the year the allotment is awarded. The Organization did not spend the required amount of the allotments.

Each location will work with the State Director and the Organization’s finance department to ensure spending levels are routinely reviewed. Monthly monitoring of specific state allocations will be done by the State Director with the School Director at each location to appropriately review revenues and expenditures which should avoid the finding occurring during the 2010-11 school year.

Sally Irvine, RMA TX State Dir

August, 2010 and ongoing January, 2011 – August, 2011


Page e387

U282M110023 0023



57


Implementation 2010-4: Employees on Governing Boards If a charter school is rated acceptable or higher, then a charter school employee may serve as a member of the governing body of the charter holder or the charter school if the employees do not constitute a quorum of the governing board or any committee of the governing body. The Organization has school employees on the Houston school’s governing board though it was rated academically unacceptable.

RMA/TX, Inc. will follow all regulations regarding school employees serving on governing boards. School employees at RMA/TX, Inc. locations with an unacceptable rating will not serve on the board while the school has an unacceptable rating. All school employees at the Houston location have resigned from the local governing board.

Dr. Norman Hall, Superintendent

August, 2010 and ongoing January, 2011 and ongoing


Page e388

U282M110023 0023

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY, INC.

ANNUAL AND FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

AUGUST 31, 2010

(WITH SUMMARIZED COMPARATIVE INFORMATION FOR 2009)


Page e389

U282M110023 0023

CONTENTS

Page Certificate of Board 1 Independent Auditor’s Report 2-3 General-Purpose Financial Statements:

Statements of Financial Position 4 Statements of Activities 5-6 Statements of Cash Flows 7-8 Notes to Financial Statements 9-16

Specific-Purpose Financial Statements and Schedules:

Statements of Financial Position: Amarillo 17 Beaumont 18 Corpus Christi 19 Killeen 20

Statements of Activities: Amarillo 21 Beaumont 22 Corpus Christi 23 Killeen 24 Lubbock 25 Midland 26

Statements of Cash Flows: Amarillo 27 Beaumont 28 Corpus Christi 29 Killeen 30 Lubbock 31 Midland 32

Schedules of Expenses: Amarillo 33 Beaumont 34 Corpus Christi 35 Killeen 36 Lubbock 37 Midland 38


Page e390

U282M110023 0023

CONTENTS (continued)

Page

Schedules of Capital Assets: Amarillo 39 Beaumont 40 Corpus Christi 41 Killeen 42

Budgetary Comparison Schedules: Amarillo 43 Beaumont 44 Corpus Christi 45 Killeen 46

Explanation of Budget Variances: Amarillo 47-48 Beaumont 49-50 Corpus Christi 51-52 Killeen 53-54

Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 55-57 Note to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 58 Report of Independent Auditors on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards

59-60 Report of Independent Auditors on Compliance with Requirements Applicable to Each Major Program and on Internal Control Over Compliance in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133

61-62 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs

63-67

Corrective Action Plan 68-71


Page e391

U282M110023 0023


Page e392

U282M110023 0023

2

Independent Auditor’s Report

Board of Directors Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. McQueeney, Texas

Members of the Board of Directors:

We have audited the accompanying statements of financial position of Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. (a nonprofit organization) (the “charter holder”) as of August 31, 2010, and the related statements of activities and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the charter holder’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The prior year summarized comparative information has been derived from the charter holder’s 2009 financial statements which were audited by us and upon which our report dated January 21, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the charter holder as of August 31, 2010, and the changes in its net assets and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 20, 2011, on our consideration of the charter holder’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit.


Page e393

U282M110023 0023

3

The budgetary comparison schedules on pages 43-46 are not a required part of the general-purpose financial statements but are supplementary information required by the Texas Education Code. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general-purpose financial statements of the charter holder as a whole. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by U.S. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations, and is not a required part of the general-purpose financial statements. The specific-purpose financial statements and schedules on pages 17-54 are likewise presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the general-purpose financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements as a whole.



Page e394

U282M110023 0023



AUGUST 31, 2010 AND 2009

2010 2009ASSETS

Current assets:Cash and cash equivalents 758,642$ 623,188$ Due from governmental agencies 276,265 333,145Prepaid assets 1,345 26,017Due from affiliates 19,575 13,543Assets of discontinued school 115,625 210,541


Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net 68,694 43,573Other assets 20,939 17,958

Total assets 1,261,085$ 1,267,965$


Accounts payable and accrued expenses 278,268$ 361,757$ Accrued payroll 162,900 201,356Liabilities of discontinued school 379,172 257,756


Net assets:Unrestricted - continuing operations 61,331 43,451 Unrestricted - discontinued school (263,547) (47,215)

Total unrestricted (202,216) (3,764) Temporarily restricted 642,961 450,860




4


Page e395

U282M110023 0023





Local support:Interest and other revenue 7,669$ -$ 7,669$ 5,410$

Total local support 7,669 - 7,669 5,410

State program revenues:Foundation School Program 4,926,675 192,101 5,118,776 5,250,212Other state aid 16,251 - 16,251 77,735


Federal program revenues:ESEA Title I, Part A 192,281 - 192,281 188,102ESEA Title II, Part A 28,558 - 28,558 24,638ESEA Title II, Part D 801 - 801 693ESEA Title IV, Part A - - - 845ESEA School Improvement Plan 760,148 - 760,148 721,913IDEA, Part B 86,104 - 86,104 101,062E-Rate 14,191 - 14,191 8,074State Fiscal Stabilization Funds 47,103 - 47,103 -

Total federal program revenues 1,129,186 - 1,129,186 1,045,327

Total revenues and net assets released from restrictions 6,079,781$ 192,101$ 6,271,882$ 6,378,684$

Totals

REVENUES


5


Page e396

U282M110023 0023




(continued)


Program services:Instruction and instruction-related 3,202,291$ -$ 3,202,291$ 3,039,286$ Instructional and school leadership 515,300 - 515,300 638,775

Support services:Administrative support services 39,700 - 39,700 1,292,544Support services - student 1,537,860 - 1,537,860 362,357Support services - non-student based 766,750 - 766,750 780,179

Total expenses 6,061,901 - 6,061,901 6,113,141

Change in net assets from continuing schools 17,880 192,101 209,981 265,543

Discontinued school (see Note 9)Loss from operation of

discontinued school (216,332) - (216,332) (345,064)

Change in net assets (198,452) 192,101 (6,351) (79,521)



Net assets, beginning of year as restated (3,764) 450,860 447,096 214,291

Net deficit transferred out to RMA/TX, Inc. (see Note 2) - - - 312,326

Net assets, end of year (202,216)$ 642,961$ 440,745$ 447,096$

Totals

EXPENSES


6


Page e397

U282M110023 0023


STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS(continued)


Foundation School Program payments 5,204,731$ 4,988,243$ Grant payments 1,116,362 1,045,327 Miscellaneous sources 7,669 5,410 Payments to vendors for goods and services rendered (2,851,657) (2,485,593) Payments to personnel for services rendered (3,284,332) (3,369,195)

Net cash provided by operating activities,continuing operations 192,773 184,192

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities,discontinued school 14,805 (188,565)

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities 207,578 (4,373)


Net cash used for investing activities, continuing operations (57,319) (3,738)

Net cash used for investing activities, discontinuedschool (10,257) (4,565)

Net cash used for investing activities (67,576) (8,303)

Net increase (decrease) in cash 140,002 (12,676) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 714,507 876,635 Cash transferred out to RMA/TX, Inc. (see Note 2) - (149,452)

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year 854,509 714,507 Less cash and cash equivalents of discontinued school,

end of year (95,867) (91,319)

Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations, end of year 758,642$ 623,188$


7


Page e398

U282M110023 0023


STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS(continued)

2010 2009Reconciliation of change in net assets to net cash

provided by (used for) operating activities:Change in net assets from continuing schools 209,981$ 265,543$ Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to

net cash provided by (used for) operating activitiesnet of assets and liabilities transferred out toRMA/TX, Inc. (see Note 2):


Due from governmental agencies 56,880 (132,262) Prepaid assets 24,672 9,028 Other assets (2,981) 35,645 Due from affiliates (15,491) 23,286

Increase (decrease) in liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued expenses (166,530) 216,709 Accrued payroll 54,044 (58,198) Due to governmental agencies - (207,442)

Net cash provided by operating activities,continuing operations 192,773 184,192

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities,discontinued school 14,805 (188,565)

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities 207,578$ (4,373)$


8


Page e399

U282M110023 0023




9

1 ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Organization Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. (the “charter holder” or the “Organization”) is a not-for-profit organization incorporated in the State of Virginia in 1998. The governing body of the Organization is the not-for-profit organization’s Board of Directors, which is composed of four members. The Board of Directors is selected pursuant to the bylaws of the Organization and has the authority to make decisions, appoint the chief executive officer of the Organization, and significantly influence operations. The Board of Directors has the primary accountability for the fiscal affairs of the Organization. The Organization provided general education services for students in grades nine through twelve in four individual charter schools in Texas. Effective January 1, 2009, the Organization operated four individual charter schools (see Note 2). Each individual school operates under an open enrollment charter granted by the State of Texas Board of Education. Each charter was renewed for a period of ten years, which end between July 31, 2013 and July 31, 2015, and are subject to review and renewal prior to the expiration dates of the charters. The Organization is part of the public school system of the State of Texas and, therefore, is entitled to distributions from the Foundation School Program, as well as other state grants and federal grants received through the State of Texas. The Organization does not have the authority to impose ad valorem taxes or to change the price of tuition. Since the Organization received funding from local, state, and federal government sources, it must comply with the requirements of the entities providing those funds. Recently adopted accounting pronouncements During fiscal year 2010, the Organization adopted changes issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) related to disclosure of subsequent events. These changes require the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date (that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued). The Organization has evaluated subsequent events through January 20, 2011, which is the date the financial statements were available to be issued. The Organization has adopted changes issued by the FASB related to authoritative hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) during its year ended August 31, 2010. These changes establish the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. The Organization adopted the ASC guidance relating to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during the year ended August 31, 2010. This guidance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position that an entity takes or expects to take in a tax return. The Organization recognizes tax benefits only to the extent that the Organization believes it is “more likely than not” that its tax


Page e400

U282M110023 0023



(continued)

10

positions will be sustained upon an examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or the applicable state taxing authority. This pronouncement is applicable to not-for-profit organizations that may be conducting unrelated business activities, which are potentially subject to income taxes, including state income taxes. The Organization assesses its income tax positions, including its continuing tax status as a not-for-profit entity, and recognizes tax benefits only to the extent that the Organization believes it is “more likely than not” that its tax positions will be sustained upon an examination by the IRS. Accordingly, there is no provision for Federal income taxes in the financial statements, as the Organization believes all tax positions, including its continuing status as a not-for-profit entity, have a greater than a 50% chance of realization after an IRS audit. State income taxes, which may be due in certain jurisdictions, have been assessed following the same “more likely than not” measurement threshold. At adoption of the guidance, the Organization did not record any cumulative effect adjustment, and it did not accrue interest expense or penalties related to any uncertain Federal or State income tax positions. Interest and penalties, if incurred, would be recognized as a component of income tax expense. There are no open Federal or State tax years under audit. Basis of presentation The accompanying general-purpose financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with the FASB ASC. The accounting system is organized pursuant to the Special Supplement to Financial Accounting and Reporting – Non-profit Charter School Chart of Accounts, a module of the Texas Education Agency (“TEA”) Financial Accountability Resource Guide. The Organization has adopted FASB ASC guidance related to contributions received and contributions made and financial statements of not-for-profit organizations. This guidance requires the organization to distinguish between contributions that increase permanently restricted net assets, temporarily restricted net assets and unrestricted net assets. It also requires recognition of contributions, including contributed services meeting certain criteria, at fair values. This guidance also establishes standards for general-purpose external financial statements of not-for-profit organizations and requires a statement of financial position, a statement of activities, a statement of cash flows and a statement of functional expenses.


Page e401

U282M110023 0023



11

Net assets and revenues, expenses, gains, and losses are classified based on the existence or absence of donor-imposed restrictions. Accordingly, net assets of the Organization and changes therein are classified and reported as follows:

Unrestricted – net assets that are not subject to donor-imposed restrictions.

Temporarily restricted – net assets subject to donor-imposed restrictions that may or will be met, either by actions of the Organization and/or the passage of time.

Permanently restricted – net assets required to be maintained in perpetuity with only

the income to be used for the Organization’s activities due to donor-imposed restrictions. Support that is restricted by the donor is reported as an increase in temporarily restricted or permanently restricted net assets in the reporting period in which the support is recognized. When a restriction expires, temporarily restricted net assets are reclassified to unrestricted net assets and reported in the statement of activities as net assets released from restrictions. Revenues received that are temporarily restricted whose restrictions are met in the same year as received are shown as unrestricted revenues, which is a policy that has been applied consistently from period to period. The financial statements include certain prior-year summarized comparative information in total but not by net asset class. Such information does not include sufficient detail to constitute a presentation in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, such information should be read in conjunction with the Organization’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009, from which the summarized information was derived. Functional expenses Since all expenses are incurred in connection with school operations, a statement of functional expenses is not presented. Reclassifications Certain reclassifications were made in the 2009 amounts to conform to their classifications in fiscal year 2010. Cash and cash equivalents The Organization’s cash consists primarily of demand deposits with financial institutions. All funds on deposit are continuously secured in accordance with the Texas Public Funds Collateral Act, Chapter 2257 of the Texas Government Code.


Page e402

U282M110023 0023



12

Capitalized assets and depreciation Capital assets acquired, which include furniture, fixtures and equipment, are reported at cost, net of accumulated depreciation, in the general-purpose and specific-purpose financial statements. The Organization’s policy is to capitalize assets that have an estimated useful life of more than one year. Expenditures for additions, major renewals and betterments are capitalized, and maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Donated assets are recorded at fair value at the date of donation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are as follows: Years Furniture, fixtures and equipment 3 – 5 Use of estimates In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the statements of financial position and affect revenues and expenses for the periods presented. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Foundation School Program revenue in the accompanying financial statements is based upon the allocation of these funds by the TEA at the time of issuance of these financial statements. The allocation by the TEA is subject to audit and adjustment in future years and, as such, all revisions to the allocation after issuance of the financial statements are adjusted prospectively (see Note 8). 2 ORGANIZATION RESTRUCTURING In November 2008, an agreement was reached between the Organization, Richard Milburn Academy/TX, Inc., an entity related by common board membership, and the TEA. Pursuant to this agreement, the Organization agreed to surrender the open-enrollment charter of its Midland and Lubbock campuses to the TEA. The purpose of the surrender was to consolidate the campuses under a single charter with the Odessa campus of Richard Milburn Academy/TX, Inc. In applying for and receiving the Midland and Lubbock campuses as expansion campuses, Richard Milburn Academy/TX, Inc. assumed all liabilities and responsibility for all debts, obligations, liabilities and other lawful duties and obligations of the two open-enrollment charters surrendered. Effective January 1, 2009, the Organization completed the transfer of all assets, liabilities, and net deficits of Midland and Lubbock to Richard Milburn Academy/TX, Inc. and recorded the transfer at historical net carrying value as of that date. The operations of the Midland and Lubbock campuses from September 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008 are included in the statements of activities for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009. From then on they are included within the operations of Odessa as these locations are now operating under its charter.


Page e403

U282M110023 0023



13

3 DUE FROM/TO GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES Due from governmental agencies in the accompanying statements of financial position include approximately $118,000 and $110,000 in funds due from federal agencies and approximately $159,000 and $280,000 due from the TEA as of August 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Based on the collectibility of funds from these sources, in the opinion of management, an allowance for doubtful accounts is not considered necessary. Due to governmental agencies in the accompanying statements of financial position include approximately $70,000 and $38,000 due to state agencies as of August 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and are included within liabilities of the discontinued school. 4 FURNITURE, FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net, as of August 31, 2010 and 2009 from continuing operations consisted of the following:

2010 2009

Furniture, fixtures and equipment 402,072$ 344,753$ Less: accumulated depreciation (333,378) (301,180)

Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net 68,694$ 43,573$

Capitalized assets acquired with public funds received by the Organization for the operation of the individual schools of Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. constitute public property pursuant to Chapter 12 of the Texas Education Code. These capitalized asset amounts are identified on the Schedule of Capital Assets for each individual charter school by respective charter on pages 39-42. Depreciation expense from continuing operations for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $32,000 in each year. 5 PENSION PLAN OBLIGATIONS Defined benefit plan The Organization contributes to the Teacher Retirement System of Texas (the “System”), a public employee retirement system. The System is a cost-sharing, multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan with one exception: all risks and costs are not borne by the Organization, but are the liability of the State of Texas. The System provides service retirement and disability retirement benefits and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. The System operates under the authority of provisions contained primarily in Texas Government Code, Title 8, Public Retirement Systems, Subtitle C, Teacher Retirement System of Texas, which is subject to amendment by the Texas Legislature.


Page e404

U282M110023 0023



14

Under provisions in State law, plan members are required to contribute 7.4% of their annual covered salary, and the State of Texas contributes an amount equal to 6.0% of the Organization’s covered payroll. Additionally, the Organization contributes 6.58% of the employees’ annual covered salary during the first three months of employment, and 0.55% thereafter. The Organization’s contributions to the System for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009 were approximately $81,000 and $56,000, respectively, and were equal to the required contributions for each year. 401(k) plan The Organization also participates in a profit-sharing plan of a related party. The plan operates under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, whereby all eligible employees are entitled to defer up to $16,500 during the 2010 and 2009 calendar years. Substantially all employees are eligible to participate in the plan depending on the length of service and attainment of minimum age requirements. Under the terms of the plan, the Organization contributes an amount to the plan at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The Organization’s contributions to the plan in fiscal 2010 and 2009 were approximately $2,000 in each year. 6 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS During the routine course of business, invoices and payroll, which apply to both the Organization and an affiliate, Richard Milburn Academy/TX, Inc., may be paid by a single entity creating an affiliate receivable or payable. The Organization tracks the amounts due to or from each affiliated entity or school separately, and these amounts are presented separately in the accompanying financial statements. Amounts due from affiliates as of August 31, 2010 and 2009 are approximately $20,000 and $14,000, respectively. 7 RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Workers’ compensation coverage, employee health, general liability, professional liability and property coverages are being provided through purchased commercial insurance with minimum deductibles for each line of coverage. Settled claims resulting from these risks have historically not exceeded commercial coverage. 8 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES Grants The Organization participates in state and federal grant programs, which are governed by various rules and regulations of the grantor agencies. Costs charged to the respective grant programs are subject to audit and adjustment by the grantor agencies; therefore, to the extent that the Organization has not complied with the rules and regulations governing the grants, refunds of any money received may be required and the collectibility of any related receivable as of August 31, 2010 may be impaired.


Page e405

U282M110023 0023



15

The Organization is required to spend a minimum amount of its allocation of special program allotments from the TEA during the year they are awarded. As of August 31, 2010, management does not believe there are any amounts due to the TEA for unexpended special program allotments. In the opinion of management, there are no significant unrecorded contingent liabilities relating to compliance with the rules and regulations governing these grants. Lease commitments The Organization’s continuing operations lease facilities under non-cancelable operating leases, which contain varying renewal options. Approximate aggregate remaining minimum rental commitments as of August 31, 2010 under these leases are summarized as follows:

Fiscal Year Ending August 31,2011 391,600$ 2012 328,294 2013 260,577 2014 96,912 2015 85,250

Total 1,162,633$

Rent expense for all operating leases for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $518,000 and $530,000, respectively. Management fees The Organization contracts with a management company for management and administrative services. The management agreements provide, among other things, for the payment of a management fee calculated based upon the gross revenues of each individual school within the Organization. The management agreements were executed following a full and open competition bidding process and were approved by the Board of Directors. For the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009, the Organization has incurred approximately $1,118,000 and $1,146,000 of management fees, respectively. Amounts due to the management company as of August 31, 2010 and 2009 are approximately $428,000 and $298,000, respectively, and are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying financial statements. State funding The Organization’s revenue stream is largely dependent upon the general state of the economy and the amounts allotted to the TEA by the state legislature. The allocation by the TEA is subject to audit and adjustment in future years and, as such, all revisions to the allocation after issuance of the financial statements are adjusted prospectively.


Page e406

U282M110023 0023



16

9 SCHOOL CLOSING On July 28, 2010, the Organization decided to close the Beaumont school due to financial reasons. All furniture and fixtures were subsequently redistributed to the Organization’s remaining campuses as directed by the TEA.

The results of operations for this school have been classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying financial statements for the periods presented. Revenues from the discontinued school were $1,210,921 and $1,440,257 for the years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The change in net assets from discontinued operations was a decrease of $216,332 and $345,064 for the years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. 10 PRIOR PERIOD RESTATEMENT All Foundation School Program funding received from the TEA is restricted by state law to be used for the benefit of the students of the respective charter school. Net assets previously reported as unrestricted have been restated in the current year as temporarily restricted to reflect funds received but not yet disbursed.


Page e407

U282M110023 0023

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY, INC. - AMARILLO


AUGUST 31, 2010 AND 2009

2010 2009ASSETS



Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net 45,630 15,263 Other assets 266 -

Total assets 266,416$ 204,378$








17


Page e408

U282M110023 0023

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY, INC. - BEAUMONT


AUGUST 31, 2010 AND 2009

2010 2009ASSETS

Current assets:Cash and cash equivalents 95,867$ 91,319$ Due from governmental agencies 565 57,122 Prepaid assets - 7,427 Due from affiliates - 29,408


Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net 12,086 25,188 Other assets 7,107 77

Total assets 115,625$ 210,541$


Accounts payable and accrued expenses 299,841$ 173,567$ Accrued payroll - 46,250 Due to governmental agencies 69,872 37,939 Due to affiliates 9,459 -


Net assets:Unrestricted (263,547) (47,215)

Total net assets (263,547) (47,215)



18


Page e409

U282M110023 0023

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY, INC. - CORPUS CHRISTI


AUGUST 31, 2010 AND 2009

2010 2009ASSETS




Total assets 325,630$ 324,791$








19


Page e410

U282M110023 0023

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY, INC. - KILLEEN


AUGUST 31, 2010 AND 2009

2010 2009ASSETS

Current assets:Cash and cash equivalents 403,148$ 352,550$ Due from governmental agencies 98,718 123,218 Prepaid assets - 8,017 Due from affiliates 15,965 -



Total assets 531,358$ 503,098$


Accounts payable and accrued expenses 86,888$ 168,373$ Accrued payroll 62,505 34,936 Due to affiliates - 12,399






20


Page e411

U282M110023 0023





Local support:5740 Other revenues from local sources 10$ -$ 10$ 4,244$


by Texas Education Agency 5,177 - 5,177 4,805Total state program revenues 1,713,081 6,279 1,719,360 1,424,296





11 Instruction 817,705 - 817,705 764,803 12 Instructional resources and media 14,676 - 14,676 6,079 13 Curriculum development and

instructional staff development 67,408 - 67,408 90,130 23 School leadership 182,049 - 182,049 190,998 31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 76,215 - 76,215 76,382 33 Health services 8,120 - 8,120 3,339 36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities 1,862 - 1,862 7,604 41 General administration 398,272 - 398,272 353,340 51 Plant maintenance and operation 162,352 - 162,352 135,322 52 Security and monitoring services 4,741 - 4,741 2,795 53 Data processing services 22,779 - 22,779 24,447 61 Community services 34,747 - 34,747 2,909

Total expenses 1,790,926 - 1,790,926 1,658,148 Change in net assets 30,367 6,279 36,646 29,308

Net assets, beginning of year aspreviously reported 107,813 - 107,813 78,505

Prior period restatement (see Note 10) (92,550) 92,550 - - Net assets, beginning of year as restated 15,263 92,550 107,813 78,505 Net assets, end of year 45,630$ 98,829$ 144,459$ 107,813$

Totals

REVENUES

EXPENSES


21


Page e412

U282M110023 0023





Local support:5740 Other revenues from local sources 11$ -$ 11$ 28$

State program revenues:5810 Foundation School Program Act 1,008,566 - 1,008,566 1,347,1875820 State program revenues distributed

by Texas Education Agency 3,021 - 3,021 3,986Total state program revenues 1,011,587 - 1,011,587 1,351,173




Total revenues and net assets released from restrictions 1,210,921 - 1,210,921 1,440,257


instructional staff development 41,919 - 41,919 67,001 21 Instructional leadership 1,730 - 1,730 - 23 School leadership 175,111 - 175,111 271,379 31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 58,019 - 58,019 82,276 32 Social work services 147 - 147 - 33 Health services - - - 12,142 34 Student transportation 2,200 - 2,200 - 36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities 25,149 - 25,149 48,394 41 General administration 324,620 - 324,620 381,997 51 Plant maintenance and operation 245,388 - 245,388 233,568 52 Security and monitoring services 26,712 - 26,712 18,005 53 Data processing services 10,431 - 10,431 21,501 61 Community services 9,740 - 9,740 15,220

Total expenses 1,427,253 - 1,427,253 1,785,321 Change in net assets (216,332) - (216,332) (345,064)

Net assets, beginning of year (47,215) - (47,215) 297,849Net assets, end of year (263,547)$ -$ (263,547)$ (47,215)$

Totals

REVENUES

EXPENSES


22


Page e413

U282M110023 0023





Local support:5740 Other revenues from local sources 2,926$ -$ 2,926$ 96$







11 Instruction 1,229,978 - 1,229,978 827,293 12 Instructional resources and media 9,950 - 9,950 7,733 13 Curriculum development and

instructional staff development 119,838 - 119,838 132,652 21 Instructional leadership 1,249 - 1,249 - 23 School leadership 162,769 - 162,769 178,259 31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 93,522 - 93,522 112,809 33 Health services 321 - 321 1,875 36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities 9,812 - 9,812 17,550 41 General administration 499,744 - 499,744 417,542 51 Plant maintenance and operation 281,117 - 281,117 279,671 52 Security and monitoring services 46,403 - 46,403 36,444 53 Data processing services 25,908 - 25,908 16,056 61 Community services 5,000 - 5,000 -

Total expenses 2,485,611 - 2,485,611 2,027,884 Change in net assets (7,286) 86,046 78,760 89,056



Totals

REVENUES

EXPENSES


23


Page e414

U282M110023 0023





Local support:5740 Other revenues from local sources 4,733$ -$ 4,733$ 22$








instructional staff development 76,421 - 76,421 26,579 23 School leadership 169,233 - 169,233 166,562 31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 71,810 - 71,810 64,289 32 Social work services 240 - 240 3,690 33 Health services 2,145 - 2,145 - 36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities 14,758 - 14,758 10,145 41 General administration 400,739 - 400,739 366,483 51 Plant maintenance and operation 131,983 - 131,983 118,011 52 Security and monitoring services 41,212 - 41,212 31,303 53 Data processing services 7,539 - 7,539 1,637 61 Community services 2,969 - 2,969 -

Total expenses 1,785,364 - 1,785,364 1,621,236 Change in net assets (5,201) 99,776 94,575 154,915



Totals

REVENUES

EXPENSES


24


Page e415

U282M110023 0023

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY, INC. - LUBBOCK




Local support:5740 Other revenues from local sources -$ -$ -$ 1,046$

State program revenues:5810 Foundation School Program Act - - - 417,5515820 State program revenues distributed

by Texas Education Agency - - - 4,346Total state program revenues - - - 421,897


Texas Education Agency - - - 73,975


Total revenues and net assets released from restrictions - - - 496,918

11 Instruction - - - 178,878 12 Instructional resources and media - - - 5,491 13 Curriculum development and

instructional staff development - - - 6,264 23 School leadership - - - 50,298 31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation - - - 18,967 32 Social work services - - - 13,322 36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities - - - 241 41 General administration - - - 101,139 51 Plant maintenance and operation - - - 41,815 52 Security and monitoring services - - - 4,223 53 Data processing services - - - 11,591 61 Community services - - - 563

Total expenses - - - 432,792 Change in net assets - - - 64,126

Net assets, beginning of year - - - (184,448) Net deficit transferred outto RMA/TX, Inc. (see Note 2) - - - 120,322

Net assets, end of year -$ -$ -$ -$

Totals

REVENUES

EXPENSES


25


Page e416

U282M110023 0023

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY, INC. - MIDLAND




Local support:5740 Other revenues from local sources -$ -$ -$ 2$

State program revenues:5810 Foundation School Program Act - - - 269,7625820 State program revenues distributed

by Texas Education Agency - - - 3,220Total state program revenues - - - 272,982


Texas Education Agency - - - 28,235


Total revenues and net assets released from restrictions - - - 301,219

11 Instruction - - - 143,286 12 Instructional resources and media - - - 2,112 13 Curriculum development and

instructional staff development - - - 15,449 23 School leadership - - - 52,658 31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation - - - 21,296 32 Social work services - - - 8,533 36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities - - - 2,315 41 General administration - - - 72,279 51 Plant maintenance and operation - - - 41,458 52 Security and monitoring services - - - 13,695

Total expenses - - - 373,081 Change in net assets - - - (71,862)

Net assets, beginning of year - - - (120,142) Net deficit transferred outto RMA/TX, Inc. (see Note 2) - - - 192,004

Net assets, end of year -$ -$ -$ -$

Totals

REVENUES

EXPENSES


26


Page e417

U282M110023 0023





Foundation School Program payments 1,740,561$ 1,284,745$ Grant payments 112,890 269,118 Miscellaneous sources 10 4,244 Payments to vendors for goods and services rendered (678,310) (665,382) Payments to personnel for services rendered (1,065,827) (971,216)



Net increase (decrease) in cash 65,630 (93,062)



Reconciliation of change in net assets to net cashprovided by (used for) operating activities:Change in net assets 36,646$ 29,308$ Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to

net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:Depreciation 13,327 4,905 (Increase) decrease in assets:

Due from governmental agencies 25,889 (38,681) Prepaid assets 8,336 2,198 Other assets (266) 12,156

Increase (decrease) in liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued expenses 12,872 21,208 Accrued payroll 12,923 (20,931) Due to governmental agencies - (90,668) Due to affiliates (403) 2,014



27


Page e418

U282M110023 0023





Foundation School Program payments 1,094,630$ 1,350,004$ Grant payments 204,770 89,056Miscellaneous sources 11 28Payments to vendors for goods and services rendered (493,153) (750,773) Payments to personnel for services rendered (791,453) (876,880)



Net increase (decrease) in cash 4,548 (193,130)



Reconciliation of change in net assets to net cashprovided by (used for) operating activities:Change in net assets (216,332)$ (345,064)$ Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to

net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:Depreciation 23,359 37,682 Loss on disposal of furniture, fixtures and equipment - 955 (Increase) decrease in assets:

Due from governmental agencies 56,557 (10,917) Prepaid assets 7,427 3,651 Other assets (7,030) 16,610 Due from affiliates 29,408 (19,404)

Increase (decrease) in liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued expenses 126,274 135,447 Accrued payroll (46,250) (17,273) Due to governmental agencies 31,933 9,748 Due to affiliates 9,459 -



28


Page e419

U282M110023 0023





Foundation School Program payments 2,019,952$ 1,759,209$ Grant payments 547,984 294,650 Miscellaneous sources 2,926 96 Payments to vendors for goods and services rendered (1,352,671) (971,727) Payments to personnel for services rendered (1,194,007) (1,011,602)

Net cash provided by operating activities 24,184 70,626



Reconciliation of change in net assets to net cashprovided by operating activities:Change in net assets 78,760$ 89,056$ Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to

net cash provided by operating activities:Depreciation 7,286 12,956 (Increase) decrease in assets:

Due from governmental agencies 6,491 (35,438) Prepaid assets 9,664 906 Other assets (96) (170)

Increase (decrease) in liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued expenses (89,037) 26,208 Accrued payroll 12,693 (368) Due to governmental agencies - (27,547) Due to affiliates (1,577) 5,023

Net cash provided by operating activities 24,184$ 70,626$


29


Page e420

U282M110023 0023





Foundation School Program payments 1,444,218$ 1,344,735$ Grant payments 455,488 368,189 Miscellaneous sources 4,733 22 Payments to vendors for goods and services rendered (822,585) (647,038) Payments to personnel for services rendered (1,025,357) (855,315)

Net cash provided by operating activities 56,497 210,593


Net increase in cash 50,598 206,855



Reconciliation of change in net assets to net cashprovided by operating activities:Change in net assets 94,575$ 154,915$ Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to

net cash provided by operating activities:Depreciation 11,100 15,926 (Increase) decrease in assets:

Due from governmental agencies 24,500 (56,316) Prepaid assets 8,017 357 Other assets 585 7,078 Due from affiliates (15,965) -

Increase (decrease) in liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued expenses (81,485) 112,386 Accrued payroll 27,569 (23,439) Due to governmental agencies - (6,889) Due to affiliates (12,399) 6,575

Net cash provided by operating activities 56,497$ 210,593$


30


Page e421

U282M110023 0023





Foundation School Program payments -$ 347,202$ Grant payments - 104,204 Miscellaneous sources - 1,046 Payments to vendors for goods and services rendered - (197,371) Payments to personnel for services rendered - (257,293)

Net cash used for operating activities - (2,212)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year - 147,254 Cash transferred out to RMA/TX, Inc. (see Note 2) - (145,042)

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year -$ -$

Reconciliation of change in net assets to net cashused for operating activities:Change in net assets -$ 64,126$ Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to

net cash used for operating activitiesnet of assets and liabilities transferred out to RMA/TX, Inc. (see Note 2):

Depreciation - 2,281 (Increase) decrease in assets:

Due from governmental agencies - (29,171) Prepaid assets - 3,181 Other assets - (13,347)

Increase (decrease) in liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued expenses - (11,043) Accrued payroll - (11,470) Due to governmental agencies - (15,295) Due to affiliates - 8,526

Net cash used for operating activities -$ (2,212)$


31


Page e422

U282M110023 0023





Foundation School Program payments -$ 236,222$ Grant payments - 67,313 Miscellaneous sources - 2 Payments to vendors for goods and services rendered - (90,192) Payments to personnel for services rendered - (220,521)

Net cash used for operating activities - (7,176)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year - 11,586 Cash transferred out to RMA/TX, Inc. (see Note 2) - (4,410)

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year -$ -$

Reconciliation of change in net assets to net cashused for operating activities:Change in net assets -$ (71,862)$ Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to

net cash used for operating activitiesnet of assets and liabilities transferred out toRMA/TX, Inc. (see Note 2):

Depreciation - 9,116 (Increase) decrease in assets:

Due from governmental agencies - 69,361 Prepaid assets - 2,386 Other assets - (12,518)

Increase (decrease) in liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued expenses - 42,008 Accrued payroll - 217 Due to governmental agencies - (67,043) Due to affiliates - 21,159

Net cash used for operating activities -$ (7,176)$


32


Page e423

U282M110023 0023




2010 2009EXPENSES


Total expenses 1,790,926$ 1,658,148$


33


Page e424

U282M110023 0023




2010 2009EXPENSES

6100 Payroll costs 745,203$ 889,633$ 6200 Professional and contracted services 503,597 612,021 6300 Supplies and materials 55,513 71,079 6400 Other operating costs 122,940 212,588

Total expenses 1,427,253$ 1,785,321$


34


Page e425

U282M110023 0023




2010 2009EXPENSES

6100 Payroll costs 1,206,700$ 1,029,234$ 6200 Professional and contracted services 871,243 781,409 6300 Supplies and materials 281,796 104,914 6400 Other operating costs 125,872 112,327

Total expenses 2,485,611$ 2,027,884$


35


Page e426

U282M110023 0023




2010 2009EXPENSES


Total expenses 1,785,364$ 1,621,236$


36


Page e427

U282M110023 0023




2010 2009EXPENSES

6100 Payroll costs -$ 245,915$ 6200 Professional and contracted services - 146,128 6300 Supplies and materials - 24,681 6400 Other operating costs - 16,068

Total expenses -$ 432,792$


37


Page e428

U282M110023 0023




2010 2009EXPENSES

6100 Payroll costs -$ 249,908$ 6200 Professional and contracted services - 85,669 6300 Supplies and materials - 10,834 6400 Other operating costs - 26,670

Total expenses -$ 373,081$


38


Page e429

U282M110023 0023



AUGUST 31, 2010

Local State Federal


Total -$ 312,367$ 3,131$

Ownership Interest


39


Page e430

U282M110023 0023



AUGUST 31, 2010

Local State Federal


Total -$ 221,508$ 152,931$

Ownership Interest


40


Page e431

U282M110023 0023



AUGUST 31, 2010

Local State Federal


Total -$ 256,357$ 19,231$

Ownership Interest


41


Page e432

U282M110023 0023



AUGUST 31, 2010

Local State Federal


Total -$ 444,399$ 105,426$

Ownership Interest


42


Page e433

U282M110023 0023






Local support:5740 Other revenues from local sources -$ -$ 10$ 10$





Total revenues 1,629,109 1,637,272 1,827,572 190,300

11 Instruction 590,750 599,366 817,705 (218,339) 12 Instructional resources and media 13,350 13,350 14,676 (1,326) 13 Curriculum development and

instructional staff development 63,625 62,947 67,408 (4,461) 21 Instructional leadership - 225 - 225 23 School leadership 248,555 248,555 182,049 66,506 31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 61,993 61,993 76,215 (14,222) 32 Social work services - - - - 33 Health services 7,482 7,482 8,120 (638) 34 Student transportation - - - - 35 Food services - - - - 36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities 13,200 13,200 1,862 11,338 41 General administration 297,926 297,926 398,272 (100,346) 51 Plant maintenance and operation 133,600 133,600 162,352 (28,752) 52 Security and monitoring services 8,200 8,200 4,741 3,459 53 Data processing services 31,875 31,875 22,779 9,096 61 Community services 850 850 34,747 (33,897)

Total expenses 1,471,406 1,479,569 1,790,926 (311,357)

Change in net assets 157,703 157,703 36,646 (121,057) Net assets, beginning of year 107,813 107,813 107,813 -


Budgeted Amounts

REVENUES

EXPENSES


43


Page e434

U282M110023 0023






Local support:5740 Other revenues from local sources -$ -$ 11$ 11$





Total revenues 1,736,820 1,745,380 1,210,921 (534,459)

11 Instruction 607,221 610,076 496,716 113,360 12 Instructional resources and media 27,500 27,500 9,371 18,129 13 Curriculum development and

instructional staff development 89,823 94,823 41,919 52,904 21 Instructional leadership 4,000 4,000 1,730 2,270 23 School leadership 204,963 204,963 175,111 29,852 31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 57,538 57,538 58,019 (481) 32 Social work services 1,000 1,000 147 853 33 Health services 20,500 20,500 - 20,500 34 Student transportation 13,039 13,039 2,200 10,839 35 Food services - - - - 36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities 17,500 17,500 25,149 (7,649) 41 General administration 317,328 317,328 324,620 (7,292) 51 Plant maintenance and operation 189,900 189,900 245,388 (55,488) 52 Security and monitoring services 48,860 48,860 26,712 22,148 53 Data processing services 35,124 35,829 10,431 25,398 61 Community services 2,000 2,000 9,740 (7,740)

Total expenses 1,636,296 1,644,856 1,427,253 217,603

Change in net assets 100,524 100,524 (216,332) (316,856) Net assets, beginning of year (47,215) (47,215) (47,215) -

Net assets, end of year 53,309$ 53,309$ (263,547)$ (316,856)$

Budgeted Amounts

REVENUES

EXPENSES


44


Page e435

U282M110023 0023






Local support:5740 Other revenues from local sources -$ -$ 2,926$ 2,926$





Total revenues 2,518,993 2,529,036 2,564,371 35,335

11 Instruction 1,166,471 1,193,293 1,229,978 (36,685) 12 Instructional resources and media 10,500 10,500 9,950 550 13 Curriculum development and

instructional staff development 128,246 111,448 119,838 (8,390) 21 Instructional leadership 3,500 3,500 1,249 2,251 23 School leadership 150,382 150,382 162,769 (12,387) 31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 58,309 58,309 93,522 (35,213) 32 Social work services - - - - 33 Health services 6,400 6,400 321 6,079 34 Student transportation - - - - 35 Food services - - - - 36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities 5,500 5,500 9,812 (4,312) 41 General administration 333,229 333,229 499,744 (166,515) 51 Plant maintenance and operation 244,096 244,096 281,117 (37,021) 52 Security and monitoring services 51,511 51,511 46,403 5,108 53 Data processing services 17,011 17,030 25,908 (8,878) 61 Community services 1,200 1,200 5,000 (3,800)

Total expenses 2,176,355 2,186,398 2,485,611 (299,213)



Budgeted Amounts

REVENUES

EXPENSES


45


Page e436

U282M110023 0023






Local support:5740 Other revenues from local sources -$ -$ 4,733$ 4,733$





Total revenues 2,573,858 2,603,496 1,879,939 (723,557)

11 Instruction 1,110,562 1,219,645 858,590 361,055 12 Instructional resources and media 22,000 22,000 7,725 14,275 13 Curriculum development and

instructional staff development 256,332 182,987 76,421 106,566 21 Instructional leadership 9,000 9,000 - 9,000 23 School leadership 176,230 176,230 169,233 6,997 31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 73,054 70,854 71,810 (956) 32 Social work services 24,731 24,731 240 24,491 33 Health services 3,800 3,800 2,145 1,655 34 Student transportation 3,000 3,000 - 3,000 35 Food services - - - - 36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities 18,500 14,500 14,758 (258) 41 General administration 271,017 271,017 400,739 (129,722) 51 Plant maintenance and operation 97,500 97,500 131,983 (34,483) 52 Security and monitoring services 23,500 23,500 41,212 (17,712) 53 Data processing services 22,922 22,922 7,539 15,383 61 Community services 5,500 5,500 2,969 2,531 81 Fund raising 3,200 3,200 - 3,200

Total expenses 2,120,848 2,150,386 1,785,364 365,022



Budgeted Amounts

REVENUES

EXPENSES


46


Page e437

U282M110023 0023


EXPLANATIONS OF BUDGET VARIANCES(continued)

Variance with Variance withActual Final Budget- Final Budget-

(Budgetary Positive PositiveFinal Basis) (Negative) (Negative) Explanation of Variance

11 Instruction 599,366 817,705 (218,339) -27% Payroll cost variance of $282,597; budget was not amended.

12 Instructional resources and media 13,350 14,676 (1,326) -9%13 Curriculum development and

instructional staff development 62,947 67,408 (4,461) -7%21 Instructional leadership 225 - 225 100% Budget was higher than actual

expenditures incurred.23 School leadership 248,555 182,049 66,506 37% Budget was higher than actual

expenditures incurred.31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 61,993 76,215 (14,222) -19% Payroll cost variance of $34,402;

budget was not amended.32 Social work services - - - 0%33 Health services 7,482 8,120 (638) -8%34 Student transportation - - - 0%35 Food services - - - 0%36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities 13,200 1,862 11,338 609% Budget was higher than actual

expenditures incurred.41 General administration 297,926 398,272 (100,346) -25% Payroll cost variance of $57,701 was

not amended; budget amendments were not done to accommodate increases in student enrollment which caused an increase in regional office allocation costs and management fees.

51 Plant maintenance and operation 133,600 162,352 (28,752) -18% Budget amendments were not done to accommodate increases in janitorial services and remodeling costs.

EXPENSES


47


Page e438

U282M110023 0023





52 Security and monitoring services 8,200 4,741 3,459 73% Budget was higher than actual expenditures incurred.

53 Data processing services 31,875 22,779 9,096 40% Budget was higher than actual expenditures incurred.

61 Community services 850 34,747 (33,897) -98% Payroll costs were not budgeted.

EXPENSES


48


Page e439

U282M110023 0023





11 Instruction 610,076 496,716 113,360 23% Budget was higher than actual expenditures incurred.

12 Instructional resources and media 27,500 9,371 18,129 193% Budget was higher than actual expenditures incurred.

13 Curriculum development and instructional staff development 94,823 41,919 52,904 126% Budget was higher than actual

expenditures incurred.21 Instructional leadership 4,000 1,730 2,270 131% Budget was higher than actual

expenditures incurred.23 School leadership 204,963 175,111 29,852 17% Budget was higher than actual

expenditures incurred.31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 57,538 58,019 (481) -1%32 Social work services 1,000 147 853 580% Budget was higher than actual

expenditures incurred.33 Health services 20,500 - 20,500 100% Budget was higher than actual

expenditures incurred.34 Student transportation 13,039 2,200 10,839 493% Budget was higher than actual

expenditures incurred.35 Food services - - - 0%36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities - 25,149 (25,149) -100% Payroll cost variance of $5,834 was

not included in budget. 41 General administration 317,328 324,620 (7,292) -2%

EXPENSES


49


Page e440

U282M110023 0023


EXPLANATIONS OF BUDGET VARIANCES(continued)Variance with Variance with

Actual Final Budget- Final Budget-(Budgetary Positive Positive

Final Basis) (Negative) (Negative) Explanation of Variance

51 Plant maintenance and operation 189,900 245,388 (55,488) -23% Payroll cost variance of $1,998 was not included in budget; repairs and contracted services of approximately $34,842 were more than anticipated and not included when amending the budget.



61 Community services 2,000 9,740 (7,740) -79% Payroll cost variance of $9,740 was not included in budget.

EXPENSES


50


Page e441

U282M110023 0023





11 Instruction 1,193,293 1,229,978 (36,685) -3%12 Instructional resources and media 10,500 9,950 550 6%13 Curriculum development and

instructional staff development 111,448 119,838 (8,390) -7%21 Instructional leadership 3,500 1,249 2,251 180% Budget was higher than actual

expenditures incurred.23 School leadership 150,382 162,769 (12,387) -8%31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 58,309 93,522 (35,213) -38% Payroll cost variance of $33,919;

budget was not amended.32 Social work services - - - 0%33 Health services 6,400 321 6,079 1894% Budget was higher than actual

expenditures incurred.34 Student transportation - - - 0%35 Food services - - - 0%36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities 5,500 9,812 (4,312) -44% Miscellaneous operating costs for

Student Transportation and Holiday Inn-Emerald Beach expenses were not included in the budget amendments (Prom Expenses, Senior Dinner)- exceeded preliminary budget.

41 General administration 333,229 499,744 (166,515) -33% Payroll cost variance of $12,078 was not amended; budget amendments were not done to accommodate increase in management fees calculated on a per student cost ratio.

EXPENSES


51


Page e442

U282M110023 0023





EXPENSES51 Plant maintenance and operation 244,096 281,117 (37,021) -13% Additional costs of $49,046 were not

included in the budget amendments for Owens Brothers Management, (RENT) Reliant Energy Costs, and A & M Cleaning Services.


53 Data processing services 17,030 25,908 (8,878) -34% Payroll cost of $3,620 was not included in budget; contracted services exceeded budget by $9,750 due to costs of annual contract, insurance, and e-rate expenditures.

61 Community services 1,200 5,000 (3,800) -76% Costs for Channel 3 exceeded original budgeted estimates.


52


Page e443

U282M110023 0023





11 Instruction 1,219,645 858,590 361,055 42% Budget was higher than actual expenditures incurred.

12 Instructional resources and media 22,000 7,725 14,275 185% Budget was higher than actual expenditures incurred.

13 Curriculum development and instructional staff development 182,987 76,421 106,566 139% Budget was higher than actual

expenditures incurred.21 Instructional leadership 9,000 - 9,000 100% Budget was higher than actual

expenditures incurred.23 School leadership 176,230 169,233 6,997 4%31 Guidance, counseling and evaluation 70,854 71,810 (956) -1%32 Social work services 24,731 240 24,491 10205% Budget was higher than actual

expenditures incurred.33 Health services 3,800 2,145 1,655 77% Budget was higher than actual

expenditures incurred.34 Student transportation 3,000 - 3,000 100% Budget was higher than actual

expenditures incurred.35 Food services - - - 0%36 Cocurricular/extracurricular activities 14,500 14,758 (258) -2%41 General administration 271,017 400,739 (129,722) -32% Budget amendments were not done to

accommodate the cost variance of $104,181 in management fees.

51 Plant maintenance and operation 97,500 131,983 (34,483) -26% Budget amendments were not done to accommodate increases in repair costs and utilities reflected in the cost variance of $11,880.

EXPENSES


53


Page e444

U282M110023 0023





52 Security and monitoring services 23,500 41,212 (17,712) -43% Payroll costs of $28,089 were not budgeted.


61 Community services 22,922 7,539 15,383 204% Budget was higher than actual expenditures incurred.

81 Fundraising 3,200 - 3,200 100% Budget was higher than actual expenditures incurred.

EXPENSES


54


Page e445

U282M110023 0023



Federal Grantor/ Federal Expenditures- Expenditures-Pass-Through Grantor/ NOGA CFDA Grant Continuing Discontinued Expenditures-

Program Title ID Numbers Number Period Operations School Total


Texas Board of Education / Title I 10610101123804


10551001014801 84.010 8/28/09 - 9/30/10 146,751$ 101,240$ 247,991$


Texas Board of Education / ARRA - Title I 10551001123804


10551001014801 84.389 8/25/09 - 9/30/11 45,530 24,181 69,711

Total Title I Cluster 192,281 125,421 317,702


Texas Board of Education / Special 1066000112380466

Education-Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) 1066000117880466 84.027 7/1/09 - 9/30/10 72,064 51,572 123,636

United States Department of Education / Texas Board of Education / ARRA - 10554001188801

Special Education-Grants to States 10554001123804

(IDEA, Part B) 10554001178804 84.391 7/1/09 - 9/30/11 14,040 5,129 19,169

Total IDEA, Part B Cluster 86,104 56,701 142,805

See accompanying note to schedule of expenditures of federal awards and independent auditor's report.

55


Page e446

U282M110023 0023





United States Department of Education / Texas Board of Education / Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities - State Grants 10691001123804 84.186 8/28/09 - 9/30/10 - 336 336

United States Department of Education / Texas Board of Education / Education Technology - State Grants 10630001188801 84.318 8/28/09 - 9/30/10 801 - 801

United States Department of Education / Texas Board of Education / Title II 10694501188801

Improving Teacher Quality State Grants 10694501178804 84.367 8/28/09 - 9/30/10 28,558 - 28,558

United States Department of Education / Texas Board of Education / 10610104178804001

School Improvement Grants 10610104014801001 84.377 10/21/09 - 9/30/10 620,731 - 620,731

United States Department of Education / Texas Board of Education / 10551004178804001

ARRA - School Improvement Grants 10551004014801001 84.377A 10/21/09 - 9/30/10 139,417 - 139,417

Total School Improvement Grant Cluster 760,148 - 760,148


56


Page e447

U282M110023 0023






Texas Board of Education/ ARRA - 10557001123804

State Fiscal Stabilization Fund - 10557001178804

Education State Grants 10557001014801 84.394 9/29/09 - 9/30/10 47,103 9,315 56,418

Federal Communications Commission / Federal Technological Assistance (E-Rate) n/a n/a 9/1/09 - 8/31/10 14,191 7,550 21,741

Total Expenditures of Federal Awards 1,129,186$ 199,323$ 1,328,509$


57


Page e448

U282M110023 0023


58

NOTE TO SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2010 1 SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of the Organization and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations.


Page e449

U282M110023 0023

59

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED

ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

Board of Directors Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. McQueeney, Texas Members of the Board of Directors: We have audited the financial statements of Richard Milburn Academy, Inc., (a nonprofit organization) (the “Organization”), as of and for the year ended August 31, 2010, and have issued our report thereon dated January 20, 2011. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Organization’s internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Organization’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Organization’s internal control over financial reporting. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that might be deficiencies, significant deficiencies, or material weaknesses. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. However, we identified a deficiency in internal control over financial reporting, described as finding 2010-1 in the accompanying schedule of findings and


Page e450

U282M110023 0023

60

questioned costs that we consider to be a significant deficiency in internal control over financial reporting. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Organization’s financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards and which are described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs as items 2010-2, 2010-3 and 2010-4. The Organization’s response to the findings identified in our audit is described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs and in the corrective action plan on pages 67-70. We did not audit the Organization’s response and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Directors, management of the Organization, the Texas Education Agency and federal awarding agencies and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



Page e451

U282M110023 0023

61

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ON COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO EACH MAJOR PROGRAM AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL

OVER COMPLIANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH OMB CIRCULAR A-133 Board of Directors Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. McQueeney, Texas Members of the Board of Directors: Compliance We have audited the compliance of Richard Milburn Academy, Inc. (a nonprofit organization) (the “Organization”) with the types of compliance requirements described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement that are applicable to each of its major federal programs for the year ended August 31, 2010. The Organization’s major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor’s results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. Compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to each of its major federal programs is the responsibility of the Organization’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Organization’s compliance based on our audit. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Organization’s compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our audit does not provide a legal determination of the Organization’s compliance with those requirements. In our opinion, the Organization complied, in all material respects, with the requirements referred to above that are applicable to each of its major federal programs for the year ended August 31, 2010. However, the results of our auditing procedures disclosed an instance of noncompliance with those requirements, which is required to be reported in


Page e452

U282M110023 0023

62

accordance with OMB Circular A-133 and which is described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs as item 2010-2. Internal Control Over Compliance Management of the Organization is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to federal programs. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Organization’s internal control over compliance with the requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on compliance and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Organization’s internal control over compliance. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be deficiencies, significant deficiencies, or material weaknesses. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. The Organization’s response to the findings identified in our audit is described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs and in the corrective action plan on pages 67-70. We did not audit the Organization’s response and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Directors, management of the Organization, the Texas Education Agency and federal awarding agencies and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



Page e453

U282M110023 0023


SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS


63

Section I - Summary of Auditor’s Results Financial Statements Type of auditor’s report issued: Unqualified Internal control over financial reporting: Material weaknesses identified? No Significant deficiencies identified that are not considered

to be material weaknesses? Yes Noncompliance material to financial statements noted? No Federal Awards Internal control over major programs: Material weaknesses identified? No Significant deficiencies identified that are not considered

to be material weaknesses? None reported Type of auditor’s report issued on compliance for major programs: Unqualified Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with section 510(a) of OMB Circular A-133? Yes Identification of major federal programs: CFDA Number Grant Period Name of Federal Program

84.010/84.389 84.377/84.377A

8/31/09 - 9/30/1110/21/09 – 9/30/10

Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies School Improvement Grants

Dollar threshold used to distinguish between type A and type B programs: $300,000 Auditee qualified as a low-risk auditee? No


Page e454

U282M110023 0023



64

Section II - Financial Statement Findings Finding No. 2010-1 – Significant Deficiency Statement of condition:

The Organization’s locations did not consistently communicate all adjustments and disposals of fixed assets to the corporate office. In addition, the fixed asset schedules were not reconciled between the location’s listing and the corporate office’s listing on a timely basis.

Context:

During our audit procedures, we noted that adjustments and disposals were not consistently communicated to the corporate office. Additionally, the fixed asset schedules have not been reconciled to the individual location’s fixed asset listings resulting in different fixed asset schedules for the same respective location.


The Organization did not have formal policies and procedures in place to mitigate reporting risks in relation to the Organization’s fixed assets.

Recommendation:

We recommend that the Organization implement formal policies and procedures to ensure that all adjustments and disposals are communicated in a timely manner to corporate and that an annual reconciliation be performed for all locations.

Management’s response: Management agreed with this finding and will implement formal policies and procedures to improve upon their internal control over financial reporting. See corrective action plan on pages 67-70.

Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs Finding No. 2010-2 Statement of condition:

The Organization could not provide documentation on the employee time and effort allocation rates for payroll expenses charged to Federal programs.

Context:

Certain Federal programs require recipients to maintain documentation on employee time and effort for payroll expenses charged to Federal programs. We noted that the required documentation for those allocations was not available.

Effect of condition: The Organization was not able to provide the necessary documentation to support its compliance with applicable grant requirements.


Page e455

U282M110023 0023



65

Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement formal policies and procedures to ensure that adequate supporting documentation be created and kept in relation to all Federal programs to ensure compliance with their respective requirements.

Management’s response: Management agreed with this finding and will implement formal policies and procedures to improve upon their compliance with federal award requirements. See corrective action plan on pages 67-70.

Section IV – State Award Findings and Questioned Costs Finding No. 2010-3 Statement of condition:

The Organization did not spend the required amount of allotments of Foundation School Program (“FSP”) funding.

Context: The Organization receives FSP allotments, which support various strategic goals. The Organization is required to spend a certain percentage of the funding in the year the allotment is awarded.


The Organization is not in compliance with state requirements concerning the amount of FSP allotments which are to be spent in the year the allotment is awarded.

Recommendation:

We recommend that the Organization implement monitoring controls over minimum expenditure requirements over allotment spending to ensure that all required expenditures are made timely.


Finding No. 2010-4 Statement of condition:

The Organization has school employees on the Beaumont school’s governing board, which constitutes a quorum.

Context: If a charter school is rated acceptable or higher, then a charter school employee may serve as a member of the governing body of the charter holder or the charter school if the


Page e456

U282M110023 0023



66

employees do not constitute a quorum of the governing body or any committee of the governing body.


The Organization is not in compliance with state requirements concerning the governing body of the Beaumont charter school.

Recommendation:

We recommend that the Organization implement controls over the number of school employees on the respective governing boards to ensure that the number of school employees on the governing boards does not constitute a quorum.


Section V – Status of Prior Year Audit Findings Finding No. 2009-1: Fixed asset schedule reconciliation During our consideration of the Organization’s controls over reporting fixed assets, we noted that the Organization’s locations did not consistently communicate all adjustments and disposals of fixed assets to the corporate office. In addition, the fixed asset schedules were not reconciled between the location’s listing and the corporate office’s listing on a timely basis. This item is repeated as Finding No. 2010-1. Finding No. 2009-2: Professional development expenditure minimums The Organization did not have any formal monitoring controls in place to ensure that it spent the minimum amount required for professional development expenditures as required by certain Federal grants the Organization received. This item was resolved during the current year. Finding No. 2009-3: Student attendance discrepancies The Organization’s Beaumont and Killeen locations had material discrepancies in the recording of student attendance as compared to the source documentation, or the source documentation could not be located. In addition, the Organization’s internal audit procedures identified areas of noncompliance and incorrect reporting. However, there were several instances where the discrepancies were not timely corrected.

This item was resolved during the current year.


Page e457

U282M110023 0023



67

Finding No. 2009-4: Employee stipends The Organization paid stipends to employees for additional services at the Beaumont location for which the services were not fully performed or may not have fully qualified.

This item was resolved during the current year. Finding No. 2009-5: Required expenditure of allotments The Organization had an expenditure shortage relating to its technology allotment in relation to its Beaumont and Corpus Christi locations.

This item is updated and repeated as Finding No. 2010-3. Finding No. 2009-6: Time and effort documentation The Organization could not fully locate all proper documentation in relation to the payroll allocations within the individual State program intent codes for maintenance of effort and within Federal programs for those allocations for all locations. This item is updated and repeated as Finding No. 2010-2.


Page e458

U282M110023 0023


CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN

FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2010

68


Implementation 2010-1: Reconciliation of Fixed Assets The Organization’s locations did not consistently communicate all adjustments and disposals of fixed assets to the corporate office. In addition, the fixed asset schedules were not reconciled between the location’s listing and the corporate office’s listing on a timely basis.

RMA, Inc. will review and strengthen formal policies and procedures for the reconciliation of fixed assets. School directors and appropriate support staff will be trained in maintaining accurate fixed assets records to ensure that all adjustments and disposals are communicated in a timely manner to corporate. An annual reconciliation will be performed at each location by the end of the fiscal year. Verification of annual reconciled fixed asset listings.

Sally Irvine, RMA TX State Dir.

January, 2011 through March 15, 2011 March 16, 2011 through August 31, 2011 By August 31, 2011 By August 31, 2011


Page e459

U282M110023 0023



69


Implementation 2010-2: Federal Awards and Time and Effort Certain Federal programs require recipients to maintain documentation on employee time and effort allocation rates for payroll expenses charged to Federal programs. The Organization could not provide documentation on the employee time and effort allocation rates for payroll expenses charged to Federal programs.

RMA, Inc. will adhere to the Federal Guidelines for maintaining documentation on employee time and effort allocation rates for payroll expenses charged to Federal programs. A review of internal processes was conducted and a determination was made that our organization would move to an electronic purchasing system. We have contracted for services with an ESC to provide services for all Federal grant expenditures, including tracking of salary paid from Federal funds. Documentation will be sent to the State Director’s Office for verification of accuracy as compared to time recorded on company timecards. Reclassification of Federal payroll dollars will be done if inaccuracies are not corrected within a 30 day time period so that Federal guidelines are adhered to properly. The Organization’s Human Resources Department will be notified should this occur so a new Personnel Action Form (PAF) can be initiated to reflect the change of fund source.

Sally Irvine, RMA TX State Dir. August, 2010 and ongoing Completed November 1, 2010 – August 31, 2011


Page e460

U282M110023 0023



70


Implementation 2010-3: Foundation School Program (FSP) Allocations The Organization receives FSP allotments from the state and is required to spend a certain percentage of the funding in the year the allotment is awarded. The Organization did not spend the required amount of the allotments.

Each location will work with the State Director and the Organization’s finance department to ensure spending levels are routinely reviewed. Monthly monitoring of specific state allocations will be done by the State Director with the School Director at each location to appropriately review revenues and expenditures which should avoid the finding occurring during the 2010-11 school year.

Sally Irvine, RMA TX State Dir

August, 2010 and ongoing January, 2011 – August, 2011


Page e461

U282M110023 0023



71


Implementation 2010-4: Employees on Governing Boards If a charter school is rated acceptable or higher, then a charter school employee may serve as a member of the governing body of the charter holder or the charter school if the employees do not constitute a quorum of the governing board or any committee of the governing body. The Organization has school employees on the Beaumont school’s governing board, which constitutes a quorum.

RMA, Inc. will follow all regulations regarding school employees serving on governing boards. The Beaumont location has closed and the governing board no longer exists.

Dr. Norman Hall, Superintendent

August, 2010 and ongoing August, 2010


Page e462

U282M110023 0023

A



Attachment 7 –Additional Information

1. RMA Weekly Attendance Report

2. Educational Performance Incentive Compact Plan (EPIC)


Page e463

U282M110023 0023

e8 PR

/Award # U

282M100015

Attachment 4 Texas Attendance Rates 2009-2010 RMA, Inc.

Application for Grants Under the Charter School Program CFDA Number: 84.282M

Enrollment

Refined

ADA

% of

Attendance

Enrollment

Refined

ADA

% of

Attendance

Enrollment

Refined ADA

% of

Attendance

Enrollment

Refined ADA

% of

Attendance

Enrollment

Refined ADA

% of

Attendance

Enrollment

Refined

ADA

% of

Attendance

Enrollment

Refined ADA

% of

Attendance

Enrollment

Refined

ADA

% of

Attendance

Enrollment

Refined

ADA

% of

Attendance

Week Ending Amarillo 609 Beaumont 610 Corpus Christi 603 Fort Worth 619 Houston 620 Killeen 604 Lubbock 601 Midland 602 Odessa 618

August 28, 2009 196 184 93.9% 119 88 74.4% 250 242 96.6% 146 138 94.7% 277 266 96.0% 149 140 93.6% 133 125 93.7% 123 118 95.9% 192 182 94.8% September 4, 2009 213 185 86.8% 148 116 78.6% 264 243 92.0% 178 151 85.2% 291 265 90.9% 156 131 84.3% 157 133 86.6% 132 121 91.9% 189 173 91.6% September 11, 2009 226 197 87.3% 126 117 74.0% 270 239 88.5% 190 149 78.8% 299 265 88.6% 155 130 83.8% 166 147 88.5% 133 124 92.8% 191 170 89.1% September 18, 2009 230 195 84.5% 163 120 73.6% 271 237 87.5% 195 162 83.1% 302 267 88.2% 155 133 85.4% 159 131 82.7% 135 125 92.8% 192 174 90.6% September 25, 2009 225 191 84.8% 166 135 81.3% 270 238 88.1% 199 155 77.8% 305 266 87.3% 158 141 89.7% 164 135 82.2% 143 129 90.6% 198 179 90.5% October 2, 2009 217 185 85.1% 158 124 78.4% 264 233 88.4% 201 158 78.8% 304 256 84.2% 158 136 86.0% 159 130 81.8% 144 127 88.3% 196 172 88.0% October 9, 2009 212 183 86.5% 157 122 77.6% 261 236 90.6% 202 155 76.7% 300 242 80.7% 158 139 88.1% 155 124 79.5% 144 126 87.1% 193 176 91.0% October 16, 2009 209 176 84.2% 152 122 79.9% 258 239 92.5% 201 156 77.9% 296 254 85.6% 160 142 88.7% 151 119 78.9% 144 133 92.5% 193 183 94.8% October 23, 2009 231 195 84.4% 148 123 83.6% 256 243 95.1% 197 157 80.0% 288 245 85.2% 158 145 91.3% 151 124 82.1% 141 130 92.1% 189 172 90.9% October 30, 2009 231 192 82.9% 153 108 70.9% 262 228 86.9% 199 151 76.2% 273 232 84.9% 159 142 89.5% 147 121 82.2% 138 124 89.7% 187 168 90.0% November 6, 2009 235 202 85.8% 154 130 84.2% 267 237 88.7% 208 160 76.9% 304 260 85.6% 160 146 91.3% 144 124 86.4% 140 125 89.2% 185 166 89.4% November 13, 2009 237 195 82.1% 153 127 82.9% 265 229 86.3% 214 177 82.6% 290 248 85.5% 153 137 89.6% 152 125 81.9% 139 127 91.6% 187 168 89.8%

November 20, 2009 234 194 82.8% 150 121 80.5% 262 231 88.5% 216 168 77.8% 289 255 88.3% 151 130 86.4% 159 130 81.7% 142 128 90.1% 188 171 91.2%

November 27, 2009

235

197

84.0%

THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY




150

128

85.3%

165

143

86.7%



December 4, 2009

231 190 82.3% 147 115 78.4% 258 220 85.3% 209 159 76.1% 272 236 86.6% 152 135 89.0% 164 124 75.4% 145 129 88.7% 189 168 88.6%

December 11, 2009 229 183 79.8% 145 115 79.4% 257 230 89.4% 204 157 77.3% 270 239 88.4% 151 131 86.7% 165 122 74.3% 147 126 85.3% 185 173 93.2% December 18, 2009 226 192 84.9% 140 106 75.5% 257 221 86.0% 197 156 79.6% 268 231 86.4% 150 135 89.4% 157 130 83.1% 149 134 90.0% 184 175 95.3% December 25, 2009

WINTER BREAK WINTER BREAK WINTER BREAK WINTER BREAK WINTER BREAK WINTER BREAK WINTER BREAK WINTER BREAK WINTER BREAK

January 1, 2010 WINTER BREAK WINTER BREAK WINTER BREAK WINTER BREAK WINTER BREAK WINTER BREAK WINTER BREAK WINTER BREAK WINTER BREAK January 8, 2010 214 169 78.7% 136 95 69.4% 253 224 88.5% 192 127 66.4% 264 217 81.9% 150 129 86.0% 148 122 82.7% 148 123 83.6% 174 142 81.6% January 15, 2010 224 180 80.4% 134 114 84.5% 251 232 92.4% 186 144 77.5% 263 227 86.4% 155 140 90.8% 153 116 75.9% 144 127 88.6% 182 166 91.2% January 22, 2010 222 169 76.1% 131 103 78.2% 265 233 87.8% 172 137 79.6% 272 250 92.2% 152 134 88.5% 162 130 80.0% 140 124 88.2% 184 164 89.0% January 29, 2010 215 169 78.6% 130 109 83.9% 264 233 88.2% 165 124 75.1% 284 243 85.5% 159 140 87.9% 163 120 73.6% 140 117 83.2% 186 165 88.4% February 5, 2010 212 164 77.4% 130 102 79.0% 265 226 85.2% 166 131 78.5% 285 239 83.8% 162 142 87.4% 165 130 79.0% 139 123 88.3% 184 169 91.5% February 12, 2010 207 164 79.4% 121 95 78.2% 262 226 86.5% 169 119 70.1% 280 222 79.4% 162 140 86.5% 168 133 79.2% 139 124 89.3% 183 164 89.6% February 19, 2010 205 164 79.7% 117 95 80.9% 258 222 86.2% 167 131 78.5% 278 217 78.1% 167 147 88.4% 172 144 83.6% 140 124 88.7% 183 166 91.0% February 26, 2010 205 154 75.5% 118 97 82.2% 251 217 86.5% 163 130 79.7% 272 208 76.5% 170 144 84.6% 181 138 76.1% 141 119 84.4% 180 166 92.1% March 5, 2010 200 160 79.6% 118 94 79.7% 245 229 93.3% 159 134 83.9% 266 213 80.2% 172 156 90.6% 180 161 89.5% 138 125 90.1% 179 170 95.1% March 12, 2010 192 148 77.0% 116 92 78.7% 242 216 89.5% 161 125 77.9% 248 206 83.0% 174 149 85.7% 177 148 83.7% 135 114 84.6% 179 172 96.2% March 19, 2010 SPRING BREAK 115 85 74.4% SPRING BREAK SPRING BREAK SPRING BREAK SPRING BREAK SPRING BREAK SPRING BREAK SPRING BREAK March 26, 2010 206 158 76.7% SPRING BREAK 238 211 88.8% 159 122 76.8% 232 194 83.6% 182 163 89.9% 170 135 79.7% 129 111 86.4% 181 160 88.7% April 2, 2010 208 163 78.6% 120 90 74.5% 235 221 93.8% 162 122 75.4% 231 189 82.0% 183 165 90.4% 163 132 81.1% 123 106 86.4% 185 167 90.5% April 9, 2010 202 155 76.6% 120 99 82.9% 244 211 86.6% 161 124 77.2% 256 224 87.5% 186 160 86.2% 150 119 79.6% 121 105 86.6% 184 163 88.6% April 16, 2010 203 164 81.0% 123 97 78.9% 245 212 86.3% 162 128 78.8% 259 218 84.0% 186 171 91.8% 151 125 82.5% 120 99 82.6% 186 167 89.9% April 23, 2010 203 161 79.4% 123 88 71.5% 241 215 89.1% 165 124 75.2% 253 208 82.4% 189 173 91.4% 148 123 82.8% 119 99 83.1% 182 163 89.4% April 30, 2010 200 168 84.1% 123 102 82.7% 238 225 94.9% 169 139 82.2% 251 201 80.1% 183 169 91.9% 146 129 88.4% 120 109 90.6% 176 167 94.9% May 7, 2010 195 160 81.9% 120 86 71.4% 234 209 89.6% 166 121 73.0% 250 195 78.1% 182 163 89.6% 145 115 79.3% 120 102 85.3% 175 157 90.0% May 14, 2010 195 156 80.3% 117 82 70.1% 234 208 89.1% 164 125 76.4% 246 203 82.4% 179 160 89.5% 143 118 82.2% 118 102 86.0% 174 162 92.9% May 21, 2010

May 28, 2010

June 4, 2010

187 156 83.6% 111 78 70.6% 231 211 91.3% 163 129 79.1% 237 188 79.2% 176 159 90.2% 140 114 80.9% 120 103 85.6% 171 162 94.5% 186 154 82.9% 109 75 68.2% 231 221 95.8% 162 120 73.8% 232 181 78.3% 172 158 91.6% 136 116 85.4% 116 100 86.0% 166 160 96.4% Last Day: 5/28/10 108 79 73.2% 231 224 96.8% 163 115 70.5% 228 152 66.7% 168 154 91.8% Last Day: 5/27/10 118 99 84.0% Last Day: 5/27/10

Last Day: 6/4/10 Last Day: 6/2/10 Last Day: 6/4/10 Last Day: 6/4/10 Last Day: 6/4/10 Last Day: 6/4/10

AVERAGE WEEKLY ENROLLMENT/ADA

213.5

174.9

81.9%

133.0

103.9

77.5%

252.6

226.2

89.6%

179.7

140.0

78.0%

270.6

227.6

83.9%

164.2

145.6

88.7%

157.0

128.4

82.0%

134.2

118.4

88.1%

184.1

167.7

91.1%

AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE % OF AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE % OF AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE % OF AVERAGE AVERAGE % OF AVERAGE AVERAGE % OF AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE % AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE % AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE % AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE % OF ENRLMNT ADA ATTND. ENRLMNT ADA ATTND. ENRLMNT ADA ATTND. ENRLMNT AVERAGE ADA ATTND. ENRLMNT AVERAGE ADA ATTND. ENRLMNT ADA OF ATTND. ENRLMNT ADA OF ATTND. ENRLMNT ADA OF ATTND. ENRLMNT ADA ATTND.


Page e464

U282M110023 0023

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY IN TEXAS

RMA, Inc. Application for Grants Under the

Charter School Program CFDA Number: 84.282M

EDUCATIONAL PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE COMPACT (EPIC) PLAN, 2005-06

The EPIC plan for the 2005-06 school year is designed to align school management, teachers, and

staff in a unified effort to assist all students in exceeding Texas Alternative Accountability Standards on the TAK.S tests. The EPIC plan has two components, School Directors and School Staff, as follows:

I. School Directors: The EPIC plan will consist of two steps. In the first step, the Director will

accumulate bonus amounts based upon the school's performance in four areas: 1.) annual surplus as of August 31, 2006, unaudited; 2.) average daily attendance (ADA); 3.) enrollment; and 4.)the annual dropout rate. In the second step, the Director will be awarded a bonus based upon the extent the school exceeds the Texas Alternative Accountability Standard of 40% on the TAK.S tests.

The criteria and amounts are:

A. Step One, Bonus Accumulation

CRITERIA

1. Annual Surplus (change in Net Assets) unaudited as of August 31, 2006

a. RMA, Texas Schools: 20% surplus b. RMA, Inc. Schools: 8% surplus

2. Enrollment of 170 or more, 2005-06 3. ADA, 85% or higher 4. -:Dropout Rate of 5o/or less

AMOUNT AVAILABLE

$8,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000

TOTAL AVAILABLE $14,000

B. Step Two, Bonus Award. Based upon student performance on TAKS Alternative

Accountability Standard as measured and reported by TEA.

CRITERIA 1. 65% met TAKS standard: 2. 75% met TAKS standard: 3. 85% met TAK.S standard:

POTENTIAL AWARD

50% or $7,000· 75% or $10,050

100% or $14,000

II. School Staff. All full-time employees of the school are eligible for the EPIC bonus, if they are in the employ of the school in good standing at the end of the 2005-06 school year and have worked for the school in uninterrupted service for at least half of the 2005-06 school year. Each staff member's award is in direct proportion to the percent ofFTE employed in 2005-06. The criterion is based upon the Texas TAI(S Alternative Accountability Standard, 40% passing on all tests taken by the "October Count" cohort in 2005-06 as measured and reported by TEA. The criteria and potential awards are:

CRITERIA 1. 65% met TAKS standard: 2. 75% met TAKS standard: 3. 85% tnet TAKS standard:

POTENTIAL AWARD

$1,000 $1,500 $2,000


Page e465

U282M110023 0023

-2-

The awards for 2005-06 will be calculated by the RMA, Texas and Inc. board chairman when the TAK.S results are released by TEA and when the unaudited FY 06 results are available from the RMHS Accounting Department. The awards will be announced as soon as possible after the above information is released.

However, the payment of the awards will commence at a date selected by RMHS Accounting,

i- depending upon the cash-flow position ofRMA, Texas and RMA, Inc. Furthermore, the payments of the bonus will be made over several pay periods, to be determined by RMHS Accounting.


Page e466

U282M110023 0023


Page e467

U282M110023 0023

Budget Narrative File(s)

* Mandatory Budget Narrative Filename: RMA, Budget Narrative.pdf

To add more Budget Narrative attachments, please use the attachment buttons below.

Add Mandatory Budget Narrative Delete Mandatory Budget Narrative View Mandatory Budget Narrative

Add Optional Budget Narrative Delete Optional Budget Narrative View Optional Budget Narrative


Page e468

U282M110023 0023

41

GO COLLEGE! GO CAREER! Project Budget Narrative

Richard Milburn Academy, Inc., the prime contractor, and Agile Minds, Inc., AVID, Inc., NESI,

Inc. and Capacity Builders, Inc. are a unique team bringing decades of proven success in the

areas of charter school management, STEM curricular achievement, student motivation, and

formative and summative large-scale evaluation. This proposal seeks for a 4 1/2 year project in

which the RMA Corpus Christi model will be expanded into six new schools, serving

approximately 1200 additional at-risk students.

Assumptions: Year 1- USDOE fund awarded by December 2011.

- Year 1 is start-up funding only for 6 months. - No state or private funds will be available.

Year 2- An average of 60 full time students per school (6 schools).

- State and federal (non grant funds) revenue at $7,000 per student. - Staffing will grow as enrollment grows, averaging a Director, Counselor and Secretary

for a half-year and three full time teachers by end of year. Year 3- First full year of steady-state operations at the school/education, management

operations/formative levels. - Enrollment assumed to grow to 150 at the end of the year with a yearly average of 125

per school. - State and non-grant funds per student assumed to be $7,200. - School teacher increased as enrollment increases to 6 FTE teachers per school, 36

teachers and school staff increases by one per school for clerical duties. Year 4- Enrollment will grow to 200 by the end of the school year with an average enrollment

of 175 per school for the year. - Changes in personnel, equipment, etc. are commensurate with enrollment increases.

Year 5- Average enrollment of 210 per school.

- Operating costs to increase by 3.0%.


Page e469

U282M110023 0023

42

Year 1: January 2012- June 2012 1. Personnel: In order to implement and conduct project operations additional staff will need to

be hired by Richard Milburn Academies (RMA). Personnel: % FTE Hourly Rate Grant

Request RMA Director RMA Director who will administer the program in alignment with the grant goals and objectives. Duties include: supervision of project staff, monitoring and reporting and data collection tasks, and general oversight of the program. ($36.00 per hour X 20 hours X 52 weeks)

50%

$36.00 Per hour

$37,500

School Directors School Directors at 6 schools. ($31.25 per hour X 8 hours X 52 weeks X 6 schools)

20%

$31.25 Per hour

$78,000

Project Staff 7 Project Staff to implement the grant funded project, including establishment of new charter schools ($20 per hour X 8 hours X 52 weeks X 7 Project Staff)

20%

$20.00 Per hour

$56,000

Total Personnel $171,500 2. Fringe Benefits: Fringe benefits for personnel hired to conduct grant activities are calculated

as follows: Fringe Benefits: Total Fringes calculated at 20% (6.2% of employee wages + Medicare @ 1.8% + Retirement @ 12%) X Personnel.

Grant Request $34,300


Page e470

U282M110023 0023

43

3. Travel: Travel expenses are required in order for staff to implement the proposed grant project as stated in project goals and objectives. The expenses below reflect the costs necessary for the RMA Director to attend the new grantee meeting. Travel Purpose # of Trips $ Per Trip Grant

Request New Grantee Meeting: This meeting will provide technical assistance for the grant project and allow for collaboration among grantees. Expenses are calculated at $5,000 to include airfare, per diem, and hotel room for 2 staff

1 (Project Director and 1 Additional Staff)

$2,500 $5,000

Site Selection: Staff to visit potential sites. Costs to include mileage, airfare, hotel room, and per diem.

20 $1,000 $20,000

Evaluator Travel: Travel is calculated for Capacity Builders, Inc. evaluator Dr. Greg Muller to travel to the program location to conduct evaluation activities per program narrative. Travel costs are $600 for airfare + $200 hotel room/ night X 4 nights) + ($50 per diem X 4 days) + ($400 for transportation costs) = $2,000

1 $2,000 $2,000

Total Travel $27,000

4. Equipment: In order to meet objectives of the project additional equipment will need to be

purchased. All proposed equipment is aligned with project goals. Supplies Grant Request Project Office Equipment related to the establishment of the project office.

$5,000

5. Supplies: Supplies include tangible, expendable property purchased at a relatively low cost

per unit. Supply costs are estimated based on the activities that will occur at the sites with some schools sharing materials. Supplies Description Grant Request General office supplies for Main Office. Office Supplies $4,000


Page e471

U282M110023 0023

44

6. Contractual: Contractual costs are estimated and will be incurred in alignment with the District’s established internal procurement system. These costs include consultant fees associated with the program evaluation, training fees and fees for equipment installation. Contractual Timing of Costs Grant Request Evaluation: Richard Milburn Academies plans to contract with Capacity Builders, Inc in order to conduct a local evaluation of the program. The evaluation will be aligned with the research questions of the national evaluation as described in the project narrative. (500 hours X $100 per hour)

$100 Per hour

$50,000

AVID- Motivation Activities Annual $20,000 Agile Minds- Curriculum Support Annual $35,000 School Lease Builders- Initial Cost of Service Annual $8,0000

Data Collection: Richard Milburn Academies plans to contract with an external provider of services to design and disseminate quarterly surveys to students and annual surveys to parent and staff. (667 hours X $75 per hour)

$75 per Hour $50,000

NonPublic Educational Services Inc.- Management Services

Annual $75,000

Total Contractual $238,000 7. Construction: N/A

8. Other: N/A

Subtotal Year 1 Grant Funds: $479,800

Indirect Rate @ 4%: $19,192

Total Project Year 1: $498,992


Page e472

U282M110023 0023

45

Year 2: July 2012- June 2013 9. Personnel: In order to implement and conduct project operations additional staff will need to



100%

$36.00 Per hour

$75,000


100%

$31.25 Per hour

$390,000

School Staff 12 School Staff to implement the grant funded project. ($20 per hour X 40 hours X 52 weeks X 12 School Staff)

100%

$20.00 Per hour

$480,000

RMA I.T. Support (100 hours X $40 Per Hour)

100 hours $40.00 Per Hour

$40,000

School Teachers 18 School Teachers to support new charter schools. ($20.00 per hour X 40 hours X 52 weeks X 18 School Teachers)

100% $20.00 Per Hour

$720,000

Total Personnel $1,705,000 10. Fringe Benefits: Fringe benefits for personnel hired to conduct grant activities are calculated




Page e473

U282M110023 0023

46



1 (Project Director and Additional Staff)

$2,500 $10,000


40 $1,000 $40,000


1 @ $2,000 $2,000 $2,000



purchased. All proposed equipment is aligned with project goals. Supplies Grant Request Student Desks, Chairs $110 X 400 $44,000 Adult Desks, Chairs $350 X 30 $10,500

Office/ Classroom Equipment $1,000 X 30 $30,000 Computers for Classrooms $800 X 300 $240,000

I.T. Wiring $100 X 180 Jobs $18,00

Smart Boards $1,400 X 24 $33,000

Total Equipment $376,100


Page e474

U282M110023 0023

47

13. Supplies: Supplies include tangible, expendable property purchased at a relatively low cost per unit. Supply costs are estimated based on the activities that will occur at the sites with some schools sharing materials. Supplies Description Grant Request General office supplies for Main Office. Office Supplies $30,000

14. Contractual: Contractual costs are estimated and will be incurred in alignment with the

District’s established internal procurement system. These costs include consultant fees associated with the program evaluation, training fees and fees for equipment installation. Contractual Timing of Costs Grant Request Evaluation: Richard Milburn Academies plans to contract with Capacity Builders, Inc in order to conduct a local evaluation of the program. The evaluation will be aligned with the research questions of the national evaluation as described in the project narrative. (1,150 hours X $100 per hour)

$100 Per hour

$116,000

School Leases 7,500 square feet X $13 per square foot

Annual $585,000

Data Collection: Richard Milburn Academies plans to contract with an external provider of services to design and disseminate quarterly surveys to students and annual surveys to parent and staff. (1,533 hours X $75 per hour)

$75 per Hour $116,000


Annual $316,000

Total Contractual $1,133,000 15. Construction: N/A

16. Other: N/A

Subtotal Year 2 Grant Funds: $3,637,100 However, only a portion will be paid for through federal funds. State Revenue is estimated at $2,520,000 for Year 2.

Actual Grant Request: $1,117,100


Total Project Year 2 Request: $1,161,784


Page e475

U282M110023 0023

48




100%

$36.00 Per hour

$75,000


100%

$31.25 Per hour

$390,000

School Staff- 3 staff per school 36 School Staff to implement the grant funded project. ($20 per hour X 40 hours X 52 weeks X 36 School Staff)

100%

$20.00 Per hour

$960,000



$40,000

School Teachers- 8 teachers per school 48 School Teachers to support new charter schools. ($20.00 per hour X 40 hours X 52 weeks X 48 School Teachers)

100% $20.00 Per Hour

$1,920,000





Page e476

U282M110023 0023

49




$2,500 $10,000


40 $1,000 $40,000


1 $2,000 $2,000





I.T. Wiring $100 X 180 Jobs $18,00

Smart Boards $1,400 X 40 $56,000



Page e477

U282M110023 0023

50



District’s established internal procurement system. These costs include consultant fees associated with the program evaluation, training fees and fees for equipment installation. Contractual Timing of Costs Grant Request Evaluation: Richard Milburn Academies plans to contract with Capacity Builders, Inc. in order to conduct a local evaluation of the program. The evaluation will be aligned with the research questions of the national evaluation as described in the project narrative. (1,200 hours X $100 per hour)

$100 Per hour

$87,000

School Leases 10,000 square feet X $13 per square foot X 6 schools

Annual $780,000

Data Collection: Richard Milburn Academies plans to contract with an external provider of services to design and disseminate quarterly surveys to students and annual surveys to parent and staff. (1600 hours X $75 per hour)

$75 per Hour $87,000


Annual $778,000


24. Other: N/A


Actual Grant Request: $831,350


Total Project Year 3 Request: $864,604


Page e478

U282M110023 0023

51




100%

$38.46 Per hour

$80,000


100%

$33.65 Per hour

$420,000

School Staff- 4 staff per school 36 School Staff to implement the grant funded project. ($20 per hour X 40 hours X 52 weeks X 24 Project Staff)

100%

$20.00 Per hour

$1,280,000



$44,000

School Teachers- 14 teachers per school 84 School Teachers to support new charter schools. ($21.15 per hour X 40 hours X 52 weeks X 84)

100% $21.15 Per Hour

$3,696,000



Grant Request $1,104,000


Page e479

U282M110023 0023

52




$2,500 $10,000

Site Visits: Staff to visit sites. Costs to include mileage, airfare, hotel room, and per diem.

50 $1,000 $50,000


1 $2,000 $2,000





I.T. Wiring $100 X 180 Jobs $18,000

Smart Boards $1,400 X 30 $42,000



Page e480

U282M110023 0023

53




$100 Per hour

$185,000


Annual $1,008,000


$75 per Hour $185,000


Annual $1,066,000


32. Other: N/A






Page e481

U282M110023 0023

54

Year 5: July 2015- June 2016

33. Personnel: In order to implement and conduct project operations additional staff will need to be hired by Richard Milburn Academies (RMA). Personnel: % FTE Hourly Rate Grant


100%

$38.46 Per hour

$80,000


100%

$33.65 Per hour

$420,000

School Staff- 4 staff per school 36 School Staff to implement the grant funded project. ($20 per hour X 40 hours X 52 weeks X 24 Project Staff)

100%

$20.00 Per hour

$1,280,000



$44,000

School Teachers- 14 teachers per school 84 School Teachers to support new charter schools. ($21.15 per hour X 40 hours X 52 weeks X 84)

100% $21.15 Per Hour

$3,696,000

Total Personnel $5,520,000

34. Fringe Benefits: Fringe benefits for personnel hired to conduct grant activities are calculated


Grant Request $1,104,000


Page e482

U282M110023 0023

55




$2,500 $10,000

Site Visits: Staff to visit sites. Costs to include mileage, airfare, hotel room, and per diem.

50 $1,000 $50,000


1 $2,000 $2,000





I.T. Wiring $100 X 180 Jobs $18,000

Smart Boards $1,400 X 30 $42,000



Page e483

U282M110023 0023

56




$100 Per hour

$185,000


Annual $1,008,000


$75 per Hour $185,000


Annual $1,066,000


40. Other: N/A





4 ½ Year Total Project Request: $6,213,036


Page e484

U282M110023 0023

Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity For ApplicantsOMB No. 1890-0014 Exp. 2/28/2009

Purpose:The Federal government is committed to ensuring that all qualified applicants, small or large, non-religious or faith-based, have an equal opportunity to compete for Federal funding. In order for us to better understand the population of applicants for Federal funds, we are asking nonprofit private organizations (not including private universities) to fill out this survey.

Upon receipt, the survey will be separated from the application. Information provided on the survey will not be considered in any way in making funding decisions and will not be included in the Federal grants database. While your help in this data collection process is greatly appreciated, completion of this survey is voluntary.

Instructions for Submitting the SurveyIf you are applying using a hard copy application, please place the completed survey in an envelope labeled "Applicant Survey." Seal the envelope and include it along with your application package. If you are applying electronically, please submit this survey along with your application.

Does the applicant have 501(c)(3) status?

How many full-time equivalent employees does the applicant have? (Check only one box).

What is the size of the applicant's annual budget? (Check only one box.)

Has the applicant ever received a grant or contract from the Federal government?

Is the applicant a local affiliate of a national organization?

Applicant's (Organization) Name:

Federal Program:CFDA Number:

Applicant's DUNS Name:Charter Schools Program (CSP) Grants for Replication and Expansion of High-Quality

84.282

1.

Is the applicant a faith-based organization?

2.

Is the applicant a secular organization?

3.

4.

5.

7.

6.

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

3 or Fewer

4-5

6-14

15-50

51-100

over 100

Less Than $150,000

$150,000 - $299,999

$300,000 - $499,999

$500,000 - $999,999

$1,000,000 - $4,999,999

$5,000,000 or more


9411045310000


Page e485

U282M110023 0023

Survey Instructions on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants

Provide the applicant's (organization) name and DUNS number and the grant name and CFDA number.

4. 501(c)(3) status is a legal designation provided on application to the Internal Revenue Service by eligible organizations. Some grant programs may require nonprofit applicants to have 501(c)(3) status. Other grant programs do not.

6. For example, two part-time employees who each work half-time equal one full-time equivalent employee. If the applicant is a local affiliate of a national organization, the responses to survey questions 2 and 3 should reflect the staff and budget size of the local affiliate.

7. Annual budget means the amount of money your organization spends each year on all of its activities.

2. Self-identify.

3. Self-identify.

1. Self-explanatory.

5. Self-explanatory.

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 1890-0014. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average five (5) minutes per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection.

Paperwork Burden Statement

If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: The Agency Contact listed in this grant application package.

OMB No. 1890-0014 Exp. 2/28/2009


Page e486

U282M110023 0023

new application for grants under the · 2014. 7. 18. · u.s. department of education washington,...

Documents