new charter school application evaluation process 2016

57
New Charter School Application Evaluation Process Presented to the SCSB on October 13, 2016 By DeLaina Tonks PhD Student Brigham Young University

Upload: delaina-tonks

Post on 08-Jan-2017

24 views

Category:

Education


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

New Charter School Application Evaluation Process

Presented to the SCSB on October 13, 2016

By DeLaina Tonks PhD Student

Brigham Young University

Page 2: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Meta-

Page 3: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Began August 2015

Completed September 2016

Page 4: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Intent to Apply

SCSB Pre- Screening Application

SCSB Screening Interview

Full Application

Reader Review

New Charter Schools Application Evaluation Process

1

2

3

4

5

Page 5: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

SCSB Review & Interview

SCSB Approval or Denial

USBE Committee Vote

USBE Vote

New Charter Schools Application Evaluation Process

Governing Board Interview

6

7

8

9

10

Page 6: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016
Page 7: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Evaluation Question 1:

Does the Governing Board Interview piece of the application

process add value, and if so, how?

Page 8: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Evaluation Question 2:

What are areas of improvement for the new charter schools application process?

Page 9: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Evaluation Question 3:

What are the strengths of the new charter schools application

process?

Page 10: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

20

19

10

4

Stakeholders

2014-2015 applicants

2015-2016 applicants

2014-2015 &2015-2016 interviewers

2014-2015 SCSB members & staff

Page 11: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Evaluation Question 1:

Does the Governing Board Interview piece of the application

process add value, and if so, how?

Page 12: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

87.18% of applicants

Agree/Strongly Agree that the GBI adds value.

Applicants

Page 13: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

90.00% of interviewers

Agree /Strongly Agree that the GBI adds value.

Interviewers

Page 14: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Defines

Helps applicants define school model (SpEd, budget, personnel).

Applicants

Page 15: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Prepares

Prepares applicants for SCSB Interview.

Applicants

Page 16: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Provides Networking

Facilitates networking

with charter pros.Applicants

Page 17: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Allows for Feedback

Applicants

Provides helpful feedback, and improves application overall.

Page 18: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Identifies Capacity

Helps to identify capacity.

Interviewers

Page 19: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Clarifies

Clarifies intentions.

Interviewers

Page 20: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

FacilitatesMentoring

Provides opportunity for mentoring.

Interviewers

Page 21: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

The Governing Board Interview piece of the application

process adds value in a variety of meaningful ways for

interviewers and applicants.

Page 22: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Lacks Continuity

Disconnect between GBI, SCSB, and USBE.

Applicants

Page 23: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Lacks Consistency

Differing opinions between SCSB and USBE.

ApplicantsInterviewers

Page 24: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Perceived Favoritism

A couple of applicants felt the interviewers

favored a certain model. Applicants

Page 25: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Evaluation Question 1:

The Governing Board Interview piece of the application, while

valuable, can be improved.

Page 26: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Timeline

1. Provide a timeline of events so the applicants and

interviewers understand the process from start to finish in order to manage expectations

Page 27: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Roles

2. Clearly define roles of each decision-maker who has a say in the process

to decrease confusion.

Page 28: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Authority

3. Post and/or review scope of authority of each entity so the

applicants understand who is responsible for what.

Page 29: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Common Errors

4. Provide a list of common errors to be aware of during

the application process so applicants can avoid them.

Page 30: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Evaluation Question 2:

What are areas of improvement for the new charter schools application process?

Page 31: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Keep GBIApplicants and interviewers indicated their support for keeping the GBI even in the responses to the areas of improvement.

Page 32: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Informative

Applicants and interviewers indicated they learned a lot from the overall application process.

Page 33: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

There wasn’t enough time to conduct the

interview appropriately.

Duration

Applicants

Page 34: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

TimingNot enough time to adjust between GBI

and SCSB interviews.

Applicants

Page 35: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Accountability

Hold applicants accountable to the

process.

Interviewers

Page 36: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Reliability

Only one set of readers reviewed each application.

Interviewers

Page 37: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

TrainingHelp applicants know all the steps of the process

and understand them well.

Interviewers

Page 38: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Duration

1. Expand the amount of time or narrow the focus of the GBI on

areas of improvement.

Page 39: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Timing

2. Allow enough time in between the GBI and the final deadline for

the application submission for applicants to finalize based on

interviewer feedback.

Page 40: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Dealbreakers

3. Identify items up front that could delay or terminate a school

for accountability purposes. Outline that if x doesn’t happen

by x date, the school will be delayed or closed.

Page 41: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Training

4. Train each stakeholder (applicants, staff, SCSB, USBE)

on each aspect of the entire process to ensure fidelity.

Page 42: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Evaluation Question 2:

There are several areas of improvement including

timing, duration, awareness of dealbreakers,

and additional training.

Page 43: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Evaluation Question 3:

What are the strengths of the new

charter schools application process?

Page 44: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Sound Process

Overall, the applicants and interviewers determined the

process was not only valuable but sound.

Page 45: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Multi-step VettingProviding checks and balances

vets schools appropriately.

Applicants

Page 46: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Multiple Stakeholders

Interacting with many stake- holders strengthens the

application process.Applicants

Page 47: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

NetworkingThe applicants enjoyed networking with charter pros and SCSB staff. Getting to know others in similar

situations was beneficial.

Applicants

Page 48: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

MissionNow that the SCSB has developed

guiding principles; mission, vision, values, it should make the

vetting process easier.

Interviewers

Page 49: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

MentoringThe Governing Board

Interview allows space for mentoring, with charter

experts teaching applicants.

Interviewers

Page 50: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

More board members, fewer administrators, fewer interviewers,

more SCSB members.

GBI Composition

Applicants

Page 51: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Additional preparation for applicants to know

what to expect.

Training

Applicants

Page 52: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Lack of consistency; interviewer perceptions varied from SCSB

and/or Utah State Board of Ed.

Perceived Disconnect

Interviewers

Page 53: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Feedback

1. Solicit stakeholder feedback annually in order to make

continuous improvements to the new charter school

application evaluation process.

Page 54: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Networking

2. Facilitate communication among stakeholders by providing

opportunities for new applicants to interact w/seasoned charter

professionals.

Page 55: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Best Practices

3. Formalize the sharing of best practices. Applicants

have innovative ideas, pros know what works. Both

benefit from sharing.

Page 56: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

Evaluation Question 3:

There are a variety of strengths including a sound process, multiple steps and

stakeholders, mission, mentoring, and networking.

Page 57: New Charter School Application Evaluation Process 2016

New Charter School Application Evaluation ProcessPresented to the SCSB on October 13, 2016 by DeLaina Tonks