new design science rubric - may 3rd 2010

Upload: david-rothauser

Post on 10-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 New Design Science Rubric - May 3rd 2010

    1/3

    Exceed the Standard (XS) Meets the Standard (MS)Approaches the Standard

    (AS)Emerging (EM)

    BackgroundResearch

    1)Backgroundresearchhasbeen

    thoroughlyconducted.

    2)Sourcesareallappropriately

    cited.

    1)Backgroundresearchhasbeen

    conducted.

    2)Mostsourcesareappropriately

    cited.

    1)Somebackgroundresearchhas

    beenconducted..

    2)Somesourcesarecited.

    1)Littleevidenceofbackground

    researchevident.

    2)Nosourcesarecited.

    Purposeand

    Hypothesis

    1)Specificquestion/purposeandhypothesisareclearlystated.

    2)Hypothesisismadeinthe if-

    then-becauseformatwithavery

    detailedandclearjustificationof

    whatthestudentthinkswill

    happenintheinvestigation.

    1)Specificquestion/purposeandhypothesisareclearlystated.

    2)Hypothesisismadeinthe if-

    then-becauseformatthatjustifies

    studentthinkingonwhatwill

    happenintheinvestigation.

    1)Aquestion/purposeisstated.

    2)Afewproblemsmayexistinthe

    contentandformatofthe

    hypothesismadeonwhatthe

    studentbelieveswillhappeninthe

    investigation.

    1)Aquestion/purposeisnotclearlystated.

    2)Manyproblemsexistinthecontentandformatofthe

    hypothesismadeonwhatthe

    studentthinkwillhappeninthe

    investigation.

    Variables

    1)Identifiesanddescribestheindependent&dependent

    variable(s).

    2)Identifiesanddescribescontrols,especiallythosethatare

    notnormallyidentified.

    1)Identifiesanddescribestheindependent&dependent

    variable(s).

    2)Identifiesanddescribescontrolsfortheinvestigation.

    1)Identifiesanddescribestheindependent&dependent

    variable(s)withafew

    misconceptions.

    2)Identifiesanddescribescontrolsfortheinvestigationwithafew

    misconceptions.

    1)Doesnotfullyidentifyordescribetheindependent&

    dependentvariable(s).

    2)Doesnotfullydescribeallthe

    controlsfortheinvestigation.

    ExperimentalDesign

    andProcedure

    1)Theprocedureisillustrated(wordsandpictures)inclearand

    logicalstepsincomplete

    sentencesandsequenceswitha

    studentsownwords.

    2)Theprocedurecanbeeasilyreproducedbythereader.

    1)Theprocedureisillustrated(wordsand/orpictures)inclear

    andlogicalstepsincomplete

    sentencesandnumbered.

    2)Theprocedurecanbereproducedbythereader.

    1)Theprocedureinillustratedinnumberedstepswithcomplete

    sentences,withminorissuesinthe

    logicalorder.

    2)Therewouldbesmallproblemstryingtoreproducethe

    experiment.

    1)Theproceduredoesnothaveallcompletesentencesorallsteps

    clearlylaidout.

    2)Tryingtoreproducetheexperimentfromtheprocedure

    wouldbeachallengeaswritten.

  • 8/8/2019 New Design Science Rubric - May 3rd 2010

    2/3

    TheResultsOrganize,Present,andExplaintheData

    TheResultsContinued...

    1)Alltablesandchartsthatwerecreatedareneatandwell

    organized.

    2)AllgraphshavetheX-Axis,Y-

    Axis,Title,andLegendaccurately

    andneatlylabeled.

    3)Allgraphshaveappropriate

    scalesandaccuratelyrepresent

    thedata.

    4)Studentarticulatewhythey

    constructedthetables,charts,

    andgraphstheywaytheydidto

    bestrepresentthedata.

    1)Alltablesandchartsthatwerecreatedareneatandwell

    organized.

    2)AllgraphshavetheX-Axis,Y-Axis,Title,andLegendaccurately

    andneatlylabeled.

    3)Allgraphshaveappropriatescalesandaccuratelyrepresent

    thedata.

    4)Studentdescribeswhatthe

    graphsaysinwords.

    1)Alltablesandchartsareorganizedandcanbeunderstood.

    2)ThereareminorissueswithsomepartsoftheX-Axis,Y-Axis,

    Title,andLegendofthegraphs

    created.

    3)Thereareminorissueswiththe

    scalesofthegraphscreatedand

    howaccuratelytheyrepresentthe

    data.

    1)Therearemajorissuesinhowthedataisorganizedintablesand

    chartsandiftheycanbe

    understood.

    2)TherearemajorissueswithsomepartsoftheX-Axis,Y-Axis,

    Title,andLegendofthegraphs

    created.

    3)Therearemajorissueswiththe

    scalesofthegraphscreatedand

    howaccuratelytheyrepresentthe

    data.

    TheConclusion-Analyze

    andInterprettheResults

    1)Drawsthoughtfuland

    thoroughconclusionsthatare

    supportedbythedata.

    2)Thoroughlyrelatesconclusions

    tooriginalquestion,hypothesis,andcurrentscientific

    understanding.

    3)Thoroughlydescribessources

    oferrorandtheireffectsonthe

    data.

    1)Drawsthoughtfulconclusions

    thataresupportedbythedata.

    2)Clearlyrelatesconclusionsto

    originalquestion,hypothesis,and

    currentscientificunderstanding.

    3)Describesseveralsourcesof

    errorandtheireffectsonthedata.

    1)Drawsconclusionsthatare

    mostlysupportedbythedata.

    2)Adequatelyrelatesconclusions

    tooriginalquestion,hypothesis,

    andcurrentscientificunderstanding.

    3)Describessourcesoferrorand

    attemptstodescribetheireffects

    onthedata.

    1)Drawsconclusionsthatarenot

    supportedbythedata.

    2)Doesnotadequatelyrelate

    conclusionstooriginalquestion,

    hypothesis,orcurrentscientificunderstanding.

    3)Doesnotdescribesourcesof

    errorordoesnotattemptto

    describetheireffectsonthedata.

  • 8/8/2019 New Design Science Rubric - May 3rd 2010

    3/3

    Presentation

    1)Communicatesclearlyinan

    appropriate,sophisticated,and

    originalway.

    2)Thoroughlyanswersquestions

    relevanttotheexperimentand

    relatedtopics.

    3)Abletoexpandonideas.

    4)Presentsselfinamature,

    professionalmanner.

    1)Communicatesclearlyinan

    appropriate,andoriginalway.

    2)Adequatelyanswersquestions

    relevanttotheexperimentand

    relatedtopics.

    3)Canexpandsomewhatonideas.

    4)Presentsselfinamature,

    professionalmanner.

    1)Communicatesclearlyinan

    appropriateway.

    2)Adequatelyanswersquestions

    relevanttotheexperiment.

    3)Presentsselfinamature,

    professionalmanner.

    1)Communicatesinanunclearor

    inappropriatemanner.

    2)Doesnotadequatelyanswer

    questionsrelevanttothe

    experiment.

    3)Overallpresentationseems

    rushed,disorganizedandincomplete.