New Energy for an Ultra-modern Vietnam

Part 3: The ScienceSection C: Implications

June 2014

To discuss this presentation and pose any questions you may have, please visit our website,

www.nangluongmoisaigon.org

Just as most scientists continue to think that the speed of light in a vacuum

doesn’t change, they also tend to think that Planck’s “constant” can’t change.

Planck’s constant (h)relates the energy in one quantum (photon) of electromagnetic radiation to the frequency of that radiation.

h = 6.62606957 × 10-34 m2 kg/s(commonly accepted value today)

Planck’s constant is important because it determines how we calculate atomic charge and atomic units

These things, then, affect how chemical reactions (including those related to LENRs) take place

Max Planck’s basic discovery in calculating

“Planck’s constant” was that energy moves in steps called “quanta”,

not in a continuous fashion

From Planck’s constant, he then derived Planck’s:

Mass: 2.17645 × 10−8 kg

Length: 1.616252×10−35 m and

Time: 5.39121 × 10−44 s

And yet, since 1940,

scientists have experimentally

observed a general rise in the value for

Planck’s “constant”http://www.setterfield.org/ZPE_light

_time/ZPE_light_and_time.html#Planck

Planck’s constant is closely connected with ZPE• In 1911, Planck’s equation for the radiant energy

density ρ of a black body was given as:

ρ(f,T)df = (8πf2/c3){[hf/(ehf/kT – 1)] + [hf/2]} df

Here, f is radiation frequency, c is light-speed, and k is Boltzmann’s constant. If the temperature, T, in (4) drops to zero, we are still left with the Zero Point term, hf/2, in the final set of square brackets.

http://www.setterfield.org/ZPE_light_time/ZPE_light_and_time.html#Planck

ρ(f,T)df = (8πf2/c3){[hf/(ehf/kT – 1)] + [hf/2]} df

• Since T does not occur in that final set of terms, that means they are temperature independent.

• Planck’s constant, h, only appears in the Zero Point term as a scale factor to align theory with experiment; no quantum interpretation is needed.

Planck’s constant is closely connected with ZPE

ρ(f,T)df = (8πf2/c3){[hf/(ehf/kT – 1)] + [hf/2]} df

• Being a scale factor means that if the ZPE strength was greater, then the value of h would be correspondingly larger.

• This means h turns out to be a measure of the strength of the ZPE

Planck’s constant is closely connected with ZPE

It follows that if ZPE can fluctuate over time, the Planck values will also vary over time!

Following Haramein’s insistence on self-similarity at all cosmological scales,

Robert Oldershaw of Amherst University believes that the Planck values need to be

furthermore adjusted for the force of gravity. If we do so, we get a new set of

Planck values which closely resemble the dimensions of the proton, one of nature’s

most common subatomic particles

Oldershaw’s gravity-adjusted “Planck” values:

http://www3.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw/newdevyear/2008/March.htm

In Oldershaw’s view, the revised value for Planck’s constant is the discrete unit of gravitational action for atomic-scale systems.

This means that the gravitational bonds within atomic scale systems are about 137 times stronger than the electromagnetic interactions within those systems.

Thus, when we are creating Charged Water/Gas clusters, Exotic Vacuum Objects, etc., and then combusting them, we are

breaking very strong gravitational bonds

The implications of viewing gravity as an important part of atomic-level interactions include:

• In bound particles, nucleons, and nuclei, gravity can be even more important than electromagnetic forces at the atomic and quantum levels

• Unbound atoms, ions, and particles have very weak gravitational interactions; their interactions are primarily electromagnetic

• The formation of a hydrogen atom from an undbounded proton and unbounded electron is a plasma-like interaction very similar to that seen in certain stellar interactions

• Gravitation plays the dominant role for internal interactions, while electromagnetism plays the dominant role for external interactions among unbounded systems.

The implications of viewing gravity as an important part of atomic-level interactions include:

If we understand the cosmos in this way, we see the physical universe behaving quite uniformly, whether we are looking at an

atom, a solar system, or a galaxy

Let’s look even more closely at

some of the implications of the

Planck values being variable (not constant), after all

The Planck length is based on the Uncertainty Principle, which says that the faster a subatomic particle is traveling, the less accurately we can predicts its position

at any given instant.

Since subatomic particles oscillate with a typical speed that is seen in most situations, it then becomes possible to calculate the range of uncertainty with regard

to a particle’s position, and we call the range of this uncertainty Planck’s length.

However, if subatomic particles speed up, the level of uncertainty increases, and hence we need to increase the value of “Planck’s length”. If subatomic particles slow down,

then it’s easier to predict their position and thus Planck’s length can be adjusted downward.

When your system begins to attract and cohere ZPE, you are changing the value of “Planck’s constant” (which as we can see really isn’t constant) within the system.

That is one reason that ZPE

extraction systems exhibit

heat, energy, and light which mainstream

scientists label “anomalous”

The flexible nature of the Planck values (based on the level of coherence of ZPE) can be applied to a system’s experience of time as well.

Potentially, some of those systems could have humans inside of them.

As Thomas Campbell explains, Planck’s constant (and hence Planck’s time) tells us that our physical reality is like a big movie that can be divided into discrete frames

appearing on the screen.

But in this movie that we call “Physical Experience”, the ‘refresh rate’ that we usually

experience is extremely fast, well over 8 billion ‘frames per second’

But if we can excite and cohere the ZPE in the quantum foam, we effectively increase the value of the Planck time, allowing fewer Planck units of time to pass relative to the

time-space outside our system, it is as though time has “slowed down” for the materials and/or organisms inside the system.

Let’s also think about the effect that variability of the value for Planck’s constant can have on mass.

When ZPE is strong, it causes subatomic particles to oscillate or “jitter” more, thus

increasing their uncertainty

The bigger the oscillations, the more space the particles are effectively taking up – which we interpret as increasing their

mass.

Since inertia is also correlated with mass, if we can decrease the ZPE in a system, it means we can decrease the mass of the

subatomic particles and, hence, “dampen” the inertial forces

Here is another corollary:

If we increase mass as a result of greater ZPE, the particles in the nucleus and the electrons

of an atom will tend to slow down

Animation: f0.pepst.com

This means that stronger ZPE will cause an atomic clock to tick more slowly --

Which also means that radioactive isotopes will slow their decay rate

One consequence of this circumstance is that paleontologists may need to factor in the

lower historical values for Planck’s “constant” when dating ancient fossils using uranium-

lead dating

Barry Setterfield estimates that in the Paleozoic Era (541 to 252 million years ago), ZPE was only about one-tenth as strong as it is

today

He contends that this allowed the nervous systems of plants and animals to work about

ten times their speed today

And thus enabling the evolution of animals and plants that are, by today’s standards, extremely large

If Setterfield’s theory is correct, it would also mean that the speed of light at

some point in the Paleozoic was around 10 times faster than it is today

Here, we see a plot of the speed of light starting on the left with our current time and proceeding toward the right to the beginning of our physical universe.

http://www.4thdayalliance.com/articles/distant-starlight/barry-setterfield/

The key point I’d like to convey in this section of the seminar is that if Planck’s

constant, the Planck time, speed of light, etc. have varied over time,

there are probably ways you can artificially induce similar variances for

these values in your ZPE systems.

You need not feel as though the Universe has erected all of the speed limits, stop signs, and road blocks that your textbooks have tried to indoctrinate you about.

Variability of the Planck values is one of the most exciting fields of research in New Energy science. It is likely to tell us much about our conscious awareness and our abilities to perceive in ways that transcend the five

physical senses.

Stay tuned for more!