new generation projects: northwest issues
DESCRIPTION
New Generation Projects: Northwest Issues. APPA New Generation Workshop August 1, 2007 Kurt J. Conger EXS, Inc. [email protected]. Energy Expert Services, Inc. Kirkland, WA. Institutional Drivers. BPA Regional Dialog Renewable Portfolio Standards Greenhouse Gas Regulation - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
New Generation Projects:New Generation Projects:Northwest IssuesNorthwest Issues
APPA New Generation WorkshopAPPA New Generation Workshop
August 1, 2007August 1, 2007
Kurt J. CongerKurt J. Conger
EXS, Inc.EXS, Inc.
[email protected]@nrgxs.comEnergy Expert Services, Inc.Energy Expert Services, Inc.Kirkland, WAKirkland, WA
2
Institutional DriversInstitutional Drivers
BPA Regional DialogBPA Regional Dialog Renewable Portfolio StandardsRenewable Portfolio Standards Greenhouse Gas RegulationGreenhouse Gas Regulation FERC Order 890FERC Order 890 NERC Reliability RequirementsNERC Reliability Requirements
3
Resource Planning ChallengesResource Planning Challenges
Transmission System CongestionTransmission System Congestion Environmental OppositionEnvironmental Opposition Load Growth UncertaintyLoad Growth Uncertainty Fuel Price UncertaintyFuel Price Uncertainty Delays in BPA Regional DialogDelays in BPA Regional Dialog
4
BPA Regional DialogBPA Regional Dialogand New Resourcesand New Resources
Current BPA wholesale power contracts expire Current BPA wholesale power contracts expire in 2011in 2011
Long-term tiered rate methodology adoptedLong-term tiered rate methodology adopted New Tier 1 contracts, based on the cost of New Tier 1 contracts, based on the cost of
existing system, will have a 20-year termexisting system, will have a 20-year term BPA Tier 2 product or non-Federal options for BPA Tier 2 product or non-Federal options for
new resourcesnew resources
5
BPA Tier 1 Rate BasicsBPA Tier 1 Rate Basics
Take-or-pay purchase commitments in 2008Take-or-pay purchase commitments in 2008 HWM determines customer share of FBSHWM determines customer share of FBS
HWM = High Water Mark (derived from load HWM = High Water Mark (derived from load forecast)forecast)
FBS = Federal Base SystemFBS = Federal Base System Forecast of Net LoadForecast of Net Load 2010 True-up Based on Actual Load Net of 2010 True-up Based on Actual Load Net of
Non-Federal ResourcesNon-Federal Resources
6
BPA Tier 2 Rate BasicsBPA Tier 2 Rate Basics
Power purchased from BPA beyond the HWM Rate set to fully recover BPA’s costs of securing
additional resources Customers can choose non-Federal power options
other than the BPA Tier 2 product Tier 2 Alternatives:Tier 2 Alternatives:
New RenewablesNew Renewables Default: portfolio of purchased power at market-based ratesDefault: portfolio of purchased power at market-based rates Vintaged: portfolio of long-term resources (10 year min)Vintaged: portfolio of long-term resources (10 year min)
7
Renewable Portfolio StandardsRenewable Portfolio Standards
Washington I-937: Initiative 937 mandates that all Washington I-937: Initiative 937 mandates that all large utilities cover 15% of their energy load with large utilities cover 15% of their energy load with eligible renewable resources by 2020.eligible renewable resources by 2020.
Oregon SB 838: Oregon passed a renewable portfolio Oregon SB 838: Oregon passed a renewable portfolio standard (RPS) that will require the largest utilities in standard (RPS) that will require the largest utilities in Oregon to provide 25 percent of their retail sales of Oregon to provide 25 percent of their retail sales of electricity from renewable sources in 2025. Smaller electricity from renewable sources in 2025. Smaller utilities will have similar, but lesser, obligations.utilities will have similar, but lesser, obligations.
8
Constrained Transmission PathsConstrained Transmission Paths
9
Potential BPA CorridorsPotential BPA Corridors
10
NWCPUD Case Study:NWCPUD Case Study:
Rapid Load GrowthRapid Load Growth BPA Regional DialogBPA Regional Dialog Two Powerplant Options ConsideredTwo Powerplant Options Considered
Energy Northwest PMECEnergy Northwest PMEC Intermountain Power Project #3Intermountain Power Project #3
May 15 Ballot ResultsMay 15 Ballot Results
11
Comparison TableComparison Table
MetricMetric PMECPMEC IPP3IPP3
TechnologyTechnology IGCCIGCC SCPCSCPC
Plant CapacityPlant Capacity 630 MW630 MW 900 MW900 MW
EPC Cost (2006$/kw)EPC Cost (2006$/kw) $2,550$2,550 $1,815$1,815
Interest RateInterest Rate 5.25%5.25% 4.80%4.80%
Term (years)Term (years) 3030 3535
Capacity FactorCapacity Factor 92%92% 90%90%
Fuel Cost ($/MWh)Fuel Cost ($/MWh) 11.3111.31 14.5514.55
Cost of Electricity at Plant ($/MWh)Cost of Electricity at Plant ($/MWh) $50.00$50.00 $39.68$39.68
TransmissionTransmission $3.60$3.60 $13.23$13.23
Total Delivered Cost per MWhTotal Delivered Cost per MWh $53.60$53.60 $52.91$52.91
12
Ballot ResultsBallot Results
““Voters spurn PUD coal planVoters spurn PUD coal plan”” 81% of voters opposed81% of voters opposed NWCPUD “recommendation was the best in NWCPUD “recommendation was the best in
terms of reliability and overall cost to the terms of reliability and overall cost to the customers”customers”
Voters provided clear direction that they Voters provided clear direction that they wanted other alternativeswanted other alternatives
Current challenge: adequate energy supply at Current challenge: adequate energy supply at an affordable price an affordable price
13
Questions?Questions?
14